Highlights
-
•
UPSC has a higher tendency for distant metastasis compared to other histologies.
-
•
Intracranial metastasis occurs in less than 1% of endometrial cancer cases.
-
•
Multimodal therapy is associated with improved outcomes for intracranial UPSC.
Abstract
Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a highly aggressive endometrial cancer histology with a propensity for distant metastasis. Despite the aggressive nature of UPSC, central nervous system metastasis is a rare occurrence with few cases reported in the literature. We present a case of a 58-year-old woman with a history of Stage IIIA UPSC who was diagnosed with recurrent, metastatic disease in the pineal gland more than 6 years after her initial diagnosis.
1. Introduction
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. It typically presents in early stages and carries a favorable prognosis. Historically, endometrial cancer was classified as Type I or Type II based on hormonal and clinical features, however, recent advances in tumor molecular profiling, such a next-generation sequencing, have translated into better identifying the molecular alterations driving these tumors and subsequently, potential targeted therapies. Though molecular profiling has provided greater insight into the landscape of endometrial tumorigenesis, efforts are underway to best incorporate molecular classification with traditional pathologic classification in guiding clinical management. The histological subtype of uterine papillary serous carcinoma is considered an aggressive subtype of endometrial carcinoma which tends to present more often as advanced stage, and molecular profiling studies have demonstrated these tumors harbor alterations in TP53, CCNE1, and HER2, compared to other histologies. While UPSC represents less than 10% of endometrial cancer cases, it accounts for up to 50% of endometrial cancer related relapses and deaths.
Despite the common finding of extrauterine spread seen in UPSC, metastasis to the central nervous system remains a rare occurrence with endometrial cancer. When brain metastasis occurs, it is often in the context of widespread disease. Primary brain metastasis is seen in less than 1% of endometrial cancer cases, has been reported most commonly with endometriosis histology, and confers a poor prognosis with median survivals ranging from 1 to 6.5 months (Gien et al., 2004, Chura et al., 2007) There are only twelve published cases of UPSC metastatic to the brain, to our knowledge (Gien et al., 2004, Dietrich et al., 2005, Chura et al., 2007, Çabuk Cömert et al., 2012, Talwar and Cohen, 2012, Gulsen and Terzi, 2013, Sierra et al., 2015, Eulálio Filho et al., 2019, Moroney et al., 2019) (Table 1) and this is the first documented case of metastasis to the pineal gland. Our patient is alive and disease-free 13 months after detection of central nervous system recurrence.
Table 1.
Summary of reported cases of metastatic UPSC to the brain.
|
Case 1 Petru 2001 |
Case 2 Gien 2004 |
Case 3 Gien 2004 |
Case 4 Dietrich 2005 |
Case 5 Chura 2007 |
Case 6 Cömert 2012 |
Case 7 Talwar 2012 |
Case 8 Gulsen 2013 |
Case 9 Sierra 2015 |
Case 10 Filho 2019 |
Case 11 Moroney 2019 |
Case 12 Moroney 2019 |
Case 13 Carson 2021 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60 | 72 | 82 | 71 | 63 | NR | 68 | 71 | 55 | 56 | 66 | 54 | 57 |
| Stage (FIGO) | NR | IIIC | IIB | IC | IA | IB | IA | NR | IIIC2 | IB | II | IVB | IIIA |
| LVSI | Yes | Yes | No | NR | NR | NR | No | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Depth myometrial invasion | M2 | M2 | M2 | M2 | M1 | M2 | M1 | NR | M2 | M2 | M1 | M2 | M1 |
| Treatment primary tumor | TAH, BSO, XRT, CT | TAH, BSO, XRT | TAH, BSO, CT | Surgical staging, CT | NR | NR | TAH, BSO, LND, CT, VBT | TAH, BSO, CT | TAH, BSO, LND, CT, XRT | TAH, BSO, LND, XRT, CT | TLH, BSO, LND, CT, XRT | TLH, BSO, LND, CT, XRT | TAH, BSO, LND, CT |
| Interval (months) between initial diagnosis and brain metastases | Unknown | 40 | 24 | 22 | 0.6 | 2 | 62 | 27 | 11 | 15 | 32 | 12 | 80 |
| Number of brain metastases | 1 | Multiple | Multiple | NR | NR | 1 | NR | Multiple | 1 | 1 | 1 | Multiple | 1 |
| Other sites of diseasea | None | Lung | Vaginal vault | Lung | None | Abdomen | Lung | NR | None | None | Lung | LungAbdomen | None |
| Treatment CNS disease | Surgery, CT, progesterone | WBRT | Steroids | NR | Surgery, WBRT, CT | NR | WBRT, CT | Surgery, WBRT, CT | Surgery, WBRT, CT | Surgery, WBRT | RT, CT | Surgery, RT, CT | Surgery, WBRT |
| Survival with brain metastases (months) | 15 | 5 | 0.25 | 2 | 9 | 5 | NR | 9b | 12b | 12 | 3 | 12b | 18b |
NR – Not reported; M1 – inner half; M2 – outer half; TAH abdominal hysterectomy; TLH - laparoscopic hysterectomy; BSO – bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; LND – lymph node dissection; CT – chemotherapy; VBT – vaginal brachytherapy; XRT – external beam pelvic radiotherapy; WBRT – whole brain radiotherapy.
When brain metastases diagnosed.
Alive at last follow-up/publication of report.
2. Case report
A 57-year-old woman with a history of FIGO Stage IIIA uterine papillary serous carcinoma diagnosed in December 2012, underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, lymph node dissection and omentectomy at that time. Her CA-125 at the time of surgery was elevated at 747 U/mL. She completed six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. For the next 6 years, the patient was followed for surveillance with imaging without any findings concerning for recurrent disease, and serial CA-125 levels which remained within normal limits and less than 20 U/mL.
In June 2019, the patient presented to her ophthalmologist with complaints of diplopia. She was noted to have weakness of the right inferior rectus muscle on exam and was recommended to undergo workup for possible myasthenia gravis. The patient also underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain which noted a heterogeneously T2 and FLAIR hyperintense extra-axial lesion within the supracerebellar cistern favoring an atypical epidermoid cyst (Fig. 1). There were no suspicious radiographic features to suggest a neoplastic etiology. Laboratory evaluation including CA-125 was within normal limits.
Fig. 1.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with a heterogeneously T2 and FLAIR hyperintense extra-axial lesion within the supracerebellar cistern.
The patient continued to have diplopia and also developed worsening headaches, prompting referral to Neurosurgery for management. Neurosurgical evaluation recommended surgical resection of a likely atypical congenital epidermoid cyst due to symptomatic mass effect. The patient underwent a suboccipital craniotomy for supracerebellar infratentorial approach in August of 2019. Intraoperatively the lesion was noted to be localized to the pineal region with both solid and cystic components. Frozen sections sent to pathology were reported consistent with a papillary tumor. Neurosurgery successfully removed the tumor, however, a small portion of residual tumor capsule was left in place due to involvement of a branch of the posterior cerebral artery.
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain noted a septated cystic lesion predominantly centered in the superior cerebellar cistern and left ambient cistern with leptomeningeal enhancement consistent with residual neoplasm. Final pathology of the pineal tumor was consistent with her uterine serous carcinoma. Positron emission tomography was negative for disease elsewhere and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine was also negative for metastatic lesions. The patient’s case was reviewed at a multidisciplinary tumor board and adjuvant radiation for treatment of residual disease was recommended. She was referred to Radiation Oncology and received a total dose of 21 Gy stereotactic radiotherapy in three fractions. Recent magnetic resonance imaging of the brain confirmed post-surgical and post-radiation treatment changes, however, no new masses or findings suspicious for recurrent disease were present. The patient was asymptomatic and without evidence of recurrent disease 18 months following treatment.
3. Discussion
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and rates of new cases annually continue to rise. The most commonly reported uterine cancer histology reported in CNS metastasis is endometriosis. Only twelve cases of UPSC brain metastases have been published and this is the first documented case of endometrial cancer metastasizing to the pineal gland. The incidence of brain metastasis from uterine carcinoma is approximately 1%, but is a devastating event with a median survival of 9 months in our literature review. For patients who received multimodal treatment, the median survival was 12 months. Potential neurosurgical complications from tumor resection include infarction, hemorrhage or hematoma, infection, and edema. Complications of cranial radiation include acute complications which occur up to six weeks following treatment, and long-term complications which can develop six months or more after treatment. Acute complications are diverse and include fatigue, headaches, and radiation dermatitis and alopecia, among others. Conversely, long-term complications include neurocognitive impairment, radiation necrosis, and neuroendocrine dysfunction. Previously, these patients were often treated with supportive or palliative care, however, therapeutic and surgical advances have led to greater treatment options.
Risk factors for cranial metastasis include advanced stage, high grade, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (Gien et al., 2004). Brain metastasis has most commonly been associated with widespread dissemination. While there is no standard or uniform treatment for patients with metastatic endometrial carcinoma to the CNS, multimodal therapy to include surgery and radiation is recommended. In a retrospective cohort study in gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastasis, only isolated brain metastasis was significantly associated with survival on multivariate analysis (Divine et al., 2016). Randomized clinical trials have also compared multimodal treatment including surgical resection and whole brain radiation to whole brain radiation alone in patient with solitary lesions and a survival advantage is seen with dual therapy. In addition to surgical treatment, factors that correlate significantly with increased survival include the absence of extracranial disease or presence of stable extracranial disease, longer time to the development of the brain metastasis, and younger age, which was consistent with our findings (Divine et al., 2016).
Our case report is unique in the following ways: 1) Compared to the other reported cases of serous endometrial carcinoma metastatic to the brain which occurred most commonly within 2 years of diagnosis, our patient was diagnosed with brain metastasis more than 6 years after initial diagnosis, and 2) the reported median survival after brain metastasis is approximately 9 months and our patient remains alive and well 18 months after brain metastasis detection. Given the low incidence of CNS metastasis with endometrial carcinoma, routine brain imaging is not commonly performed or recommended by NCCN guidelines. However, in a patient with a history of a high-grade endometrial carcinoma, new neurologic symptoms or visual changes should prompt early evaluation for potential metastatic disease to the CNS.
4. Conclusion
This is the thirteenth case report of brain metastasis from UPSC and the first report of UPSC metastatic to the pineal gland, with the longest post-treatment survival of CNS disease reported to date. Given its rarity, there is no standardized treatment for metastatic UPSC to the CNS. For oligometastatic brain lesions, the highest likelihood of curability, and survival is with multimodal treatment including surgical resection followed by radiotherapy. In patients with a history of UPSC with neurologic or ophthalmologic symptoms, prompt evaluation for potential CNS metastasis should be performed.
Patient consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review upon request.
Author contribution
All authors contributed to the literature search. SC and KB drafted the manuscript. KH and KB provided review of figures and revised the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript for publication.
Financial disclosure
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Disclaimer
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as the official policy of the Department of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
No financial support or funding was received for this manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the patient for trusting us with her care and her assistance in completing this report.
References
- Çabuk Cömert E., Bildaci T.B., Kisa Karakaya B., Tarhan N.Ç., Özen Ö., Gülşen S., Dursun P., Ayhan A. Outcomes in 12 gynecologic cancer patients with brain metastasis: a single center’s experience. Turkish J. Med. Sci. 2012;42:385–394. doi: 10.3906/sag-1101-1382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chura J.C., Marushin R., Boyd A., Ghebre R., Geller M.A., Argenta P.A. Multimodal therapy improves survival in patients with CNS metastasis from uterine cancer: a retrospective analysis and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol. 2007;107(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dietrich C.S., Modesitt S.C., Depriest P.D., Ueland F.R., Wilder J., Reedy M.B., Pavlik E.J., Kryscio R., Cibull M., Giesler J., Manahan K., Huh W., Cohn D., Powell M., Slomovitz B., Higgins R.V., Merritt W., Hunter J., Puls L., Gehrig P., Van Nagell J.R. The efficacy of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in Stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) Gynecol. Oncol. 2005;99(3):557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Divine L.M., Kizer N.T., Hageman A.R. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with gynecologic malignancies metastatic to the brain. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016;142(1):76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eulálio Filho W.M.N., Fé T.S.D.M., Rodrigues R.M.D.M., Lima M.S.O., Vieira S.C. Brain metastasis in papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. e Obstet. 2019;41(4):264–267. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gien L.T., Kwon J.S., D’Souza D.P., Radwan J.S., Hammond J.A., Sugimoto A.K., Carey M.S. Brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;93:524–528. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gulsen S., Terzi A. Multiple brain metastases in a patient with uterine papillary serous adenocarcinoma: treatment options for this rarely seen metastatic brain tumor. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2013;4:111. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.117176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moroney, M.R., Wheeler, L.J., Corr, B.R., 2019. Clinical presentation of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: a case series. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 10.1016/j.gore.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Sierra T., Nguyen L., Mascitelli J., Kalir T., Fishman D. Brain metastasis from uterine serous carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2015;11:34. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talwar S., Cohen S. Her-2 targeting in uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2012;2(3):94–96. doi: 10.1016/j.gynor.2012.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

