Skip to main content
Precision Clinical Medicine logoLink to Precision Clinical Medicine
. 2021 Jan 7;4(1):56–61. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa039

RhoA and Cdc42 in T cells: Are they targetable for T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases?

Fukun Guo 1,
PMCID: PMC8023016  PMID: 33842837

Abstract

Many inflammatory diseases are not curable, necessitating a better understanding of their pathobiology that may help identify novel biological targets. RhoA and Cdc42 of Rho family small GTPases regulate a variety of cellular functions such as actin cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and survival. Recent characterization of mouse models of conditional gene knockout of RhoA and Cdc42 has revealed their physiological and cell type-specific roles in a number of cell types. In T lymphocytes, which play an important role in the pathogenesis of most, if not all, of the inflammatory diseases, we and others have investigated the effects of T cell-specific knockout of RhoA and Cdc42 on T cell development in the thymus, peripheral T cell homeostasis, activation, and differentiation to effector and regulatory T cells, and on T cell-mediated allergic airway inflammation and colitis. Here we highlight the phenotypes resulting from RhoA and Cdc42 deletion in T cells and discuss whether pharmacological targeting of RhoA and Cdc42 is feasible in treating asthma that is driven by allergic airway inflammation and colitis.

Keywords: RhoA, Cdc42, T cells, allergic airway inflammation, colitis

Introduction

RhoA and Cdc42 belong to the Rho family small GTPases of the Ras superfamily. Like other Rho GTPases, RhoA and Cdc42 cycle between GTP-bound active and GDP-bound inactive states.1,2 In their active form, RhoA and Cdc42 bind to and activate a number of immediate downstream effector molecules (e.g. ROCK of RhoA effectors, PAK1 of Cdc42 effectors).3 Overexpression of dominant active or negative mutants of RhoA and Cdc42 has revealed a role for RhoA and Cdc42 in modulating actin cytoskeleton organization, cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and survival.4–11 For example, in T lymphocytes, overexpression of the dominant mutants suggests that RhoA plays a role in thymocyte adhesion, thymic egress, and T cell polarization.12–17 Furthermore, similar to dominant negative mutant approach, inactivation of RhoA by C3 transferase in transgenic mice causes a blockade in thymocyte development.18,19 Likewise, Cdc42 plays a role in thymocyte development, T cell actin and tubulin cytoskeleton polarization, and T cell migration.20–23 However, these functions of RhoA and Cdc42 are perplexed by the nonspecific nature of the dominant mutants or C3 transferase that may affect other Rho GTPases.24–28 In this context, distinct and cell type-specific functions of RhoA have been uncovered using RhoA knockout mice. For example, in contrast to the prevailing view that RhoA is critical for actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and cell adhesion, RhoA deficiency in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts does not alter actin stress fiber and focal adhesion complex formation.29 Therefore, the physiologic and selective role of RhoA and Cdc42 can only be revealed by a genetic approach.

In this brief review, we summarize recent progress in characterizing mouse models of gene knockout of RhoA and Cdc42 in T cells and discuss whether RhoA and Cdc42 are targetable in T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases.

RhoA and Cdc42 in thymocyte development

Thymocyte development proceeds sequentially from CD4CD8 double-negative (DN), CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP), to CD4+ or CD8+ single-positive (SP). The differentiation of DN thymocytes to DP cells is contingent on the rearrangement of T cell receptor (TCR) β gene, namely V(D)J recombination, and β-selection, a process in which DN thymocytes successfully expressing rearranged TCRβ are rescued from cell death and allowed to proliferate and differentiate to DP cells. The differentiation of DP cells to SP cells relies on positive selection, a process in which DP thymocytes expressing TCRαβ of low affinity to self-peptide/MHC complexes are instructed to mature to SP cells.30,31

By deletion of RhoA gene starting from DN thymocytes, we and others have found that RhoA is important for thymocyte development.30,32 Mechanistically, RhoA promotes β-selection and positive selection. β-selection and positive selection are accompanied by thymocyte survival and proliferation. We have shown that RhoA is essential for thymocyte survival and proliferation likely through restraining reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to maintain ATP levels in thymocytes.30 Interestingly, while we found that RhoA deficiency decreased CD4+ SP thymocytes,30 López-Posadas et al. found that deletion of RhoA starting from DP thymocytes increased CD4+ SP thymocytes,33 suggesting a developmental stage-specific role of RhoA in thymocyte development. By deletion of Cdc42 gene starting from DN thymocytes, we have found that Cdc42 is required for thymocyte development by promoting positive selection. Mechanistically, Cdc42 facilitates thymocyte proliferation, survival, and migration.31 In contrast to the well-recognized role of Cdc42 in the regulation of cell adhesion,4 Cdc42 is not important for thymocyte adhesion, indicating that the role of Cdc42 in cell adhesion is cell type-dependent.31

RhoA and Cdc42 in T cell homeostasis and activation

After maturation in the thymus, CD4+ or CD8+ SP thymocytes migrate to the periphery, where they are maintained as resting, naive T cells. Naive T cells are maintained mainly by IL-7-mediated T cell survival.34 Upon antigen recognition, naive T cells become activated and expanded.35

We and others found that RhoA deletion caused a reduction in naive T cell numbers and impaired T cell activation and expansion,32,33,35 suggesting that RhoA is required for T cell homeostasis, activation, and proliferation. Mitochondrial metabolism is important for T cell activation.36 We found that RhoA deficiency dampened oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis in activated T cells,35 suggesting that RhoA promotes T cell activation through regulating mitochondrial function. Cdc42 deficiency mimicked RhoA deficiency in reducing T cell numbers, attributable to a defect in IL-7-mediated survival signaling.34 Interestingly, unlike RhoA deficiency that attenuated T cell activation and expansion, depletion of Cdc42 enhanced T cell activation and expansion.34 Therefore, Cdc42 functions to maintain T cell homeostasis and limit T cell activation and proliferation. Cdc42 may do so through its immediate downstream effector PAK1.34

RhoA and Cdc42 in effector and regulatory T cell differentiation

Upon activation and expansion, naive T cells differentiate to either effector T cells or induced regulatory T (iTreg) cells. CD4+ naive T cells can differentiate to several types of effector T helper (Th) cells, among which Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells have been well studied. Maturation of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells requires discrete cytokine signals. Th1 cell differentiation requires IFN-γ-elicited STAT1 and IL-12-triggered STAT4 signaling cascades, Th2 cell differentiation requires IL-4-mediated STAT6 signaling pathway, and Th17 cell differentiation requires IL-6-mediated STAT3.1–3 The cytokine signaling in Th1 cells promotes expression and/or DNA binding of transcription factor T-bet, leading to the synthesis of Th1 signature cytokines including IFN-γ and TNF-α. The cytokine signaling in Th2 cells promotes expression and/or DNA binding of transcription factor GATA3, leading to the synthesis of Th2 signature cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. The cytokine signaling in Th17 cells promotes expression and/or DNA binding of transcription factor RORγt, leading to the synthesis of Th17 signature cytokines such as IL-17A, IL17F, and IL-21.37–39 CD4+ naive T cells can also differentiate to iTreg cells, which requires TGF-β-induced expression of SMAD proteins. SMAD proteins in turn promote the expression of transcription factor Foxp3 that is shared by naturally occurring regulatory T (nTreg) cells derived from DP thymocytes.40

We found that RhoA deficiency led to reduced Th2 and Th17 cell differentiation, as evidenced by decreased expression of Th2 and Th17 cell signature cytokines and transcription factors. RhoA deficiency had no effect on Th1, iTreg, and nTreg cell differentiation.35,41 These findings suggest that RhoA is critical for the differentiation of Th2 and Th17, but not Th1, iTreg, and nTreg cells. Glycolysis is important for effector T cell differentiation.42,43 We have found that RhoA promotes Th2 cell differentiation via induction of glycolysis.35 We have further shown that glycolysis upregulates IL-4R and GATA3 to impact on RhoA-mediated Th2 cell differentiation.35 Moreover, it appears that RhoA regulates Th2 cell differentiation through its immediate downstream effector ROCK.35,44 On the other hand, deletion of Cdc42 starting from DN thymocytes enhanced Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation,31,45 whereas post-thymic deletion of Cdc42 inhibited Th2 cell differentiation,46 suggesting a developmental stage-specific role of Cdc42 in regulating Th cell differentiation. Deletion of Cdc42 starting from DN thymocytes diminished iTreg cell differentiation and destabilized iTreg cells but seemed not to affect nTreg cell development.31,45 Treg cell-specific deletion of Cdc42 also did not affect nTreg cell development but decreased peripheral nTreg cell numbers and destabilized nTreg cells.45 Thus, Cdc42 restrains the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 cells but promotes the differentiation of Th2 and iTreg cells and the homeostasis and stability of nTreg cells. Mechanistically, Cdc42 restrains Th17 cell differentiation through repression of glycolysis, whereas it promotes iTreg and nTreg cell stability through induction of glycolysis.

RhoA and Cdc42 in effector T cell- and Treg cell-mediated inflammatory diseases

Th2 cells help eliminate parasitic organisms, whereas Th17 cells help eradicate extracellular bacterial and fungal infections. On the other hand, both Th2 and Th17 cells promote allergic airway inflammation that drives the development of asthma, a respiratory disease that affects more than 300 million people worldwide. In their regulation of allergic airway inflammation, Th2 cells promote eosinophilic inflammation, whereas Th17 cells promote neutrophilic inflammation. Glucocorticoids are the most effective and widely used anti-inflammation drugs for the treatment of asthma. Unfortunately, glucocorticoids show excessive toxicity over long-term use. Furthermore, around 5–10% of asthma patients develop severe asthma and are refractory to current therapies.47–49 Therefore, asthma remains an unmet medical need and understanding of the pathobiology of asthma is warranted.

We found that RhoA deletion in T cells attenuated Th2 cell-mediated allergic airway inflammation in an ovalbumin (OVA)-induced mouse model of asthma. Upon OVA induction, RhoA−/− mice showed a drastic reduction in inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) and the lungs. Th2 cell cytokines (e.g. IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) in BALF and other mediators of inflammation including Eotaxin, MUC-5AC and Gob-5 in lung tissue and IgE in serum, were significantly lower in RhoA-deficient mice compared with RhoA-proficient mice.35 We further found that RhoA deletion affected mixed Th2/Th17 cell-mediated allergic airway inflammation that was induced by house dust mite (HDM), a more physiologically relevant allergen than OVA. We found that while HDM-treated RhoA-proficient mice showed robust eosinophils and neutrophils in BALF, HDM-treated RhoA-deficient mice had markedly reduced eosinophils and neutrophils in BALF. In line with this, lung Th2 and Th17 cells were decreased in HDM-treated RhoA-deficient mice.41 These findings suggest that RhoA-regulated Th2 and Th17 cell differentiation are essential for asthma development. Similar to RhoA deletion, post-thymic deletion of Cdc42 alleviated OVA-induced allergic airway inflammation,46 suggesting that Cdc42-mediated Th2 cell differentiation is critical for asthma pathogenesis.

Th17 cells are not only important for asthma development but also essential for ulcerative colitis, a wasting disease representing a chronic disabling disorder.50,51 Colitis is currently treated by standard medication including corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, and anti-TNFα therapies.52,53 However, treatment failures often occur,53 necessitating a better understanding of colitis pathobiology.

Our unpublished data found that RhoA deficiency in T cells impeded colitis development in a mouse model of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). While RhoA-proficient mice showed massive infiltration of inflammatory cells into the colon upon DSS treatment, RhoA-deficient mice had no apparent inflammatory cell infiltration. Specifically, Th17 cells were reduced in the colon of DSS-treated RhoA-deficient mice, suggesting that RhoA-regulated Th17 cell differentiation is required for colitis development. In contrast to RhoA deletion, Cdc42 deficiency in T cells led to exacerbated colitis in both a mouse model of colitis induced by DSS and that induced by naive T cell transfer into Rag1−/− mice.45 In both of the mouse models, Cdc42 deficiency caused an increase in Th17 cells in the colon.45 These findings suggest that Cdc42 in T cells restrains Th17 cell-mediated colitis.

Treg cells play a central role in maintaining immune tolerance by inhibition of effector T cell function. Defects in Treg cell differentiation, homeostasis and stability may lead to excessive effector T cell responses and concomitant autoimmunity.54,55

In keeping with the defective differentiation and stability, Cdc42-deficient iTreg cells lost their function in suppressing Th17 cells and Th17 cell-mediated colitis.45 Consistent with the defective homeostasis and stability, Cdc42-deficient nTreg cells failed to maintain immune tolerance, resulting in increased effector T cells and systemic inflammatory disorders in Treg cell-specific Cdc42 knockout mice.45 These findings suggest that Cdc42 in Treg cells acts to maintain immune homeostasis and prevent autoimmune diseases.

Are RhoA and Cdc42 targetable for T cell-mediated inflammatory diseases?

The inhibition of allergy airway inflammation by genetic targeting of RhoA and Cdc42 suggests that RhoA and Cdc42 are biologic targets for asthma. In support, a RhoA chemical inhibitor Y16 ameliorated HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation and a Cdc42 chemical inhibitor CASIN attenuated both OVA- and HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation.41,46 The inhibitory effects of Y16 and CASIN on allergic airway inflammation were likely through their effects on Th2 and/or Th17 cell differentiation. As such, 30 μM of Y16 suppressed Th2 and Th17 cell differentiation in vitro and 30 mg/kg of Y16 suppressed Th2 and Th17 cells in a mouse model of allergy airway inflammation,41 while 10 μM of CASIN inhibited Th2 cell differentiation in vitro and 30 mg/kg of CASIN inhibited Th2 cells in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation.46 Of note, similar to RhoA deletion, Y16 did not affect Th1 and iTreg cell differentiation.41 Similar to post-thymic Cdc42 deletion, CASIN did not affect Th1, Th17, and iTreg cell differentiation.46 The selectivity of Y16 and CASIN towards Th2 and/or Th17 cells in vitro and in allergic airway inflammation suggests that RhoA and Cdc42 are targetable in treating asthma. In further support, RhoA activity is increased in airway biopsies of asthma patients,56 indicating that targeting of RhoA will likely be a viable approach in asthma therapy. In its suppression of allergic airway inflammation, 30 mg/kg CASIN did not affect thymocyte development and T cell homeostasis. Importantly, treatment of post-thymic Cdc42-deficient mice with 30 mg/kg CASIN did not further inhibit Cdc42 deficiency-attenuated allergic airway inflammation,46 suggesting that CASIN does not cause off-target effects. Moreover, in inflammation-free C57BL/6 mice, 30 mg/kg of CASIN did not cause autoantibody production, organ damage/systemic inflammation and weight loss (our unpublished data). Nonetheless, Y16 and CASIN could potentially affect other inflammatory cells involved in asthma development, for instance, eosinophils and mast cells, as well as non-inflammatory asthma-mediating lung epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells. In addition, Y16 and CASIN may affect cells that are not involved in asthma pathobiology. Thus, detailed toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies of Y16 and CASIN are warranted.

With respect to colitis, our unpublished study found that RhoA deficiency starting from DN thymocytes attenuated DSS-induced colitis, suggesting that targeting of RhoA may benefit patients with colitis. However, deletion of RhoA starting from DP thymocytes resulted in spontaneous colitis,33 cautioning RhoA targeting for colitis treatment. Given that Cdc42 deficiency aggravated colitis,45 a targeting strategy of suppression of Cdc42 will likely be detrimental for patients with colitis, while a Cdc42 activator may be beneficial.

Finally, targeting of RhoA may benefit patients with multiple sclerosis, because RhoA deficiency ameliorated Th17 cell-mediated neuro-inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalo-myelitis (EAE),32 a mouse model of human multiple sclerosis.57

Conclusions

Recent work using conditional gene knockout of RhoA and Cdc42 in T cells has found that both RhoA and Cdc42 are required for thymocyte development and peripheral T cell homeostasis. RhoA promotes but Cdc42 restrains T cell activation. RhoA does not affect but Cdc42 inhibits Th1 cell differentiation. Both RhoA and Cdc42 are important for Th2 cell differentiation. In addition, RhoA promotes but Cdc42 restrains Th17 cell differentiation (Fig. 1). Consistent with the positive role of RhoA in Th2 and Th17 cell differentiation and of Cdc42 in Th2 cell differentiation, RhoA and Cdc42 contribute to the development of allergic airway inflammation. The selectivity of RhoA inhibitor Y16 towards Th2 and Th17 cells and of Cdc42 inhibitor CASIN towards Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo implicates that targeting of RhoA and Cdc42 holds new promise in treatment for patients with asthma.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Role of RhoA and Cdc42 in thymocyte development and peripheral T cell homeostasis, activation, and differentiation. Inline graphic: Promotion; Inline graphic: Inhibition.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. R01CA234038).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  • 1. Van Aelst L, D'Souza-Schorey C. Rho GTPases and signaling networks. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2295–322.. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.18.2295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature. 2002;420:629–35.. doi: 10.1038/nature01148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Thumkeo D, Watanabe S, Narumiya S. Physiological roles of Rho and Rho effectors in mammals. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92:303–15.. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nobes CD, Hall A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell. 1995;81:53–62.. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lin R, Cerione RA, Manor D. Specific contributions of the small GTPases Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 to Dbl transformation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23633–41.. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Guo F, Zheng Y. Involvement of Rho family GTPases in p19Arf- and p53-mediated proliferation of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:1426–38.. doi: 10.1128/mcb.24.3.1426-1438.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zohn IM, Campbell SL, Khosravi-Far R, et al. Rho family proteins and Ras transformation: the RHOad less traveled gets congested. Oncogene. 1998;17:1415–38.. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Olson MF, Ashworth A, Hall A. An essential role for Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases in cell cycle progression through G1. Science. 1995;269:1270–2.. doi: 10.1126/science.7652575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Melendez J, Grogg M, Zheng Y. Signaling role of Cdc42 in regulating mammalian physiology. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 22375–81.. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.200329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Johnson DI. Cdc42: An essential Rho-type GTPase controlling eukaryotic cell polarity. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63: 54–105.. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.1.54-105.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wong K, Ren XR, Huangm YZ, et al. Signal transduction in neuronal migration: roles of GTPase activating proteins and the small GTPase Cdc42 in the Slit-Robo pathway. Cell. 2001;107:209–21.. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00530-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rougerie P, Largeteau Q, Megrelis Let al. Fam65b is a new transcriptional target of FOXO1 that regulates RhoA signaling for T lymphocyte migration. J Immunol. 2013;190:748–55.. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. del Pozo MA, Vicente-Manzanares M, Tejedor R, et al. Rho GTPases control migration and polarization of adhesion molecules and cytoskeletal ERM components in T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:3609–20.. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3609::AID-IMMU3609>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Heasman SJ, Carlin LM, Cox S, et al. Coordinated RhoA signaling at the leading edge and uropod is required for T cell transendothelial migration. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:553–63.. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201002067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Vielkind S, Gallagher-Gambarelli M, Gomez M, et al. Integrin regulation by RhoA in thymocytes. J Immunol. 2005;175:350–7.. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mou F, Praskova M, Xia F, et al. The Mst1 and Mst2 kinases control activation of rho family GTPases and thymic egress of mature thymocytes. J Exp Med. 2012;209:741–59.. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Corre I, Gomez M, Vielkind S, et al. Analysis of thymocyte development reveals that the GTPase RhoA is a positive regulator of T cell receptor responses in vivo. J Exp Med. 2001;194:903–14.. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.7.903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Henning SW, Galandrini R, Hall A, et al. The GTPase Rho has a critical regulatory role in thymus development. Embo J. 1997;16:2397–407.. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Galandrini R, Henning SW, Cantrell DA. Different functions of the GTPase Rho in prothymocytes and late pre-T cells. Immunity. 1997;7:163–74.. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80519-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stowers L, Yelon D, Berg LJ, et al. Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:5027–31.. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.5027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tskvitaria-Fuller I, Seth A, Mistry N, et al. Specific patterns of Cdc42 activity are related to distinct elements of T cell polarization. J Immunol. 2006;177:1708–20.. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Haddad E, Zugaza JL, Louache F, et al. The interaction between Cdc42 and WASP is required for SDF-1-induced T-lymphocyte chemotaxis. Blood. 2001;97:33–8.. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Na S, Li B, Grewal IS, et al. Expression of activated CDC42 induces T cell apoptosis in thymus and peripheral lymph organs via different pathways. Oncogene. 1999;18:7966–74.. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zheng Y. Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26:724–32.. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(01)01973-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bishop AL, Hall A. Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem J. 2000;348:241–55.. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3480241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Guo F, Debidda M, Yang L, et al. Genetic deletion of Rac1 GTPase reveals its critical role in actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion complex assembly. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:18652–9.. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603508200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Debreceni B, Gao Y, Guo F, et al. Mechanisms of guanine nucleotide exchange and Rac-mediated signaling revealed by a dominant negative trio mutant. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2777–86.. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308282200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Aktories K, Just I. Monoglucosylation of low-molecular-mass GTP-binding Rho proteins by clostridial cyto toxins. Trends Cell Biol. 1995;5:441–3.. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Melendez J, Stengel K, Zhou X, et al. RhoA GTPase is dispensable for actomyosin regulation but is essential for mitosis in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:15132–7.. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C111.229336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhang S, Konstantinidis DG, Yang JQet al. Gene targeting RhoA reveals its essential role in coordinating mitochondrial function and thymocyte development. J Immunol. 2014;193:5973–82.. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Guo F, Zhang S, Tripathi P, et al. Distinct roles of Cdc42 in thymopoiesis and effector and memory T cell differentiation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Manresa-Arraut A, Johansen FF, Brakebusch C, et al. RhoA drives T-Cell activation and encephalitogenic potential in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1235. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. López-Posadas R, Fastancz P, Carmen Martínez-Sánchez LDet al. Inhibiting PGGT1B disrupts function of RHOA, resulting in T-cell expression of integrin α4β7 and development of colitis in mice. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:1293–309.. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Guo F, Hildeman D, Tripathi Pet al. Coordination of IL-7 receptor and T-cell receptor signaling by cell-division cycle 42 in T-cell homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:18505–10.. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010249107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yangm JQ, Kalim KW, Li Y, et al. RhoA orchestrates glycolysis for Th2 cell differentiation and allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:231–45..e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Sena LA, Li S, Jairaman A, et al. Mitochondria are required for antigen-specific T cell activation through reactive oxygen species signaling. Immunity. 2013;38:225–36.. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bedoya SK, Lam B, Lau K, et al. Th17 cells in immunity and autoimmunity. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:986789. doi: 10.1155/2013/986789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Schmitt N, Ueno H. Regulation of human helper T cell subset differentiation by cytokines. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;34:130–6.. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Annunziato F, Romagnani C, Romagnani S. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:626–35.. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ohkura N, Kitagawa Y, Sakaguchi S. Development and maintenance of regulatory T cells. Immunity. 2013;38:414–23.. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yang JQ, Kalim KW, Li Y, et al. Ablation of RhoA impairs Th17 cell differentiation and alleviates house dust mite-triggered allergic airway inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;106:1139–51.. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3A0119-025RRR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yang K, Shrestha S, Zeng H, et al. T cell exit from quiescence and differentiation into Th2 cells depend on Raptor-mTORC1-mediated metabolic reprogramming. Immunity. 2013;39:1043–56.. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB, et al. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2013;153:1239–51.. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhou W, Yang Y, Mei Cet al. Inhibition of Rho-Kinase Downregulates Th17 Cells and Ameliorates Hepatic Fibrosis by Schistosoma japonicum Infection. Cells. 2019;8:E1262. doi: 10.3390/cells8101262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kalim KW, Yang JQ, Li Y, et al. Reciprocal regulation of glycolysis-driven Th17 pathogenicity and Treg stability by Cdc42. J Immunol. 2018;200:2313–26.. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Yang JQ, Kalim KW, Li Y, et al. Rational targeting Cdc42 restrains Th2 cell differentiation and prevents allergic airway inflammation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2019;49:92–107.. doi: 10.1111/cea.13293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Robinson KM, Manni ML, Biswas PS, et al. Clinical consequences of targeting IL-17 and TH17 in auto immune and allergic disorders. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:587–95.. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0361-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Pelaia G, Vatrella A, Maselli R. The potential of biologics for the treatment of asthma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:958–72.. doi: 10.1038/nrd3792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Krishnamoorthy N, Douda DN, Brüggemann TR, et al. Neutrophil cytoplasts induce TH17 differentiation and skew inflammation toward neutrophilia in severe asthma. Sci Immunol. 2018;3:eaao4747. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aao4747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Khan HM, Mehmood F, Khan N. Optimal management of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2015;8:293–302.. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S57248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Harbour SN, Maynarda CL, Zindla CL, et al. Th17 cells give rise to Th1 cells that are required for the pathogenesis of colitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:7061–6.. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415675112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Huoponen S, Blom M. A systematic review of the Cost-Effectiveness of biologics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Moreau J, Mas E. Drug resistance in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;25:56–61.. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ohkura N, Kitagawa Y, Sakaguchi S. Development and maintenance of regulatory T cells. Immunity. 2013;38:414–23.. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Huynh A, DuPage M, Priyadharshini B, et al. Control of PI(3) kinase in Treg cells maintains homeostasis and lineage stability. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:188–96.. doi: 10.1038/ni.3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bhattacharya M, Sundaram A, Kudo M, et al. IQGAP1-dependent scaffold suppresses RhoA and inhibits airway smooth muscle contraction. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4895–8.. doi: 10.1172/JCI76658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. McCarthy DP, Richards MH, Miller SD. Mouse models of multiple sclerosis: Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and Theiler's virus-induced demyelinating disease. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;900:381–401.. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-720-4_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Precision Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES