Abstract
Background
Pregnancies in patients with complement gene variant-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (cTMA) are challenging, and pregnancies in such patients after kidney transplantation (KTX) are even more so.
Methods
We identified nine pregnancies following KTX of three genetically high-risk cTMA patients enrolled in the Vienna thrombotic microangiopathy cohort. Preventive plasma therapy was used in three pregnancies, and one patient had ongoing eculizumab (ECU) therapy during two pregnancies.
Results
Seven out of nine pregnancies (78%) resulted in the delivery of healthy children. The other two included one early abortion at gestational Week 12 during ongoing ECU therapy and one late foetal death at gestational Week 33 + 3, most likely not related to complement dysregulation. Kidney transplant function after delivery remained stable in all but one pregnancy. In the aforementioned case, a severe cTMA flare occurred after delivery despite use of preventive plasma infusions. Kidney graft function could be rescued in this patient by ECU. As such, successful pregnancies can be accomplished in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a history of cTMA. We used preemptive plasma therapy or ongoing ECU treatment in selected cases.
Conclusions
Thus, becoming pregnant can be encouraged in KTRs with native kidney cTMA. Extensive preconception counselling, however, is mandatory in such cases.
Keywords: atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, complement system, delivery, eculizumab, gravidity, kidney transplant recipient, neonate, pregnancy, pregnancy-associated complement gene variant-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy
INTRODUCTION
A diagnosis of complement gene variant-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (cTMA) or atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome bears a high risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD); recurrence and graft loss following kidney transplantation (KTX); maternal and foetal complications due to pregnancy-related flares of cTMA in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs); and for maternal and foetal complications related to pre-pregnancy impaired kidney transplant function and immunosuppressive therapy [1–3]. Therefore, transplant physicians are somewhat reluctant to support the wish to have a child in female KTRs with a native kidney cTMA. Thus, data on clinical outcomes of pregnancies in KTRs with cTMA are scarce.
The largest series of pregnancies in women suffering from cTMA [4–7] or from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura [8, 9] did not report pregnancies in KTRs with a native kidney cTMA. In contrast, our group recently discussed maternal and foetal outcomes of 27 pregnancies in 14 women with a diagnosis of cTMA, which also included pregnancies of KTRs [1]. We here specifically extend this earlier observation and report detailed delivery outcomes of successful pregnancies in genetically high-risk KTRs with a native kidney cTMA enrolled in the Vienna thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) cohort (Supplementary data, Figure S1). We further embark on management strategies and discuss pros and cons of the desire to have a child in such women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From the Vienna TMA cohort, which was established in 2014 at the Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna [1, 2], and includes patients with all types of TMA, we identified women with a given diagnosis of cTMA who conceived after having received a kidney graft [10]. These patients were also enrolled in a separate pregnancy outcome study. Demographic, clinical and genetic data of the mothers and their offspring were retrieved from the electronic and paper-based healthcare records of our institution. The institutional review board (IRB) at the Medical University of Vienna approved the study (for the Vienna TMA cohort: unique IRB identifier: 1368/2014; for the pregnancy outcome study: unique IRB identifier: 1265/2014). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Genetic analyses were performed at the Department of Laboratory Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna and the Research Laboratory of the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University in Budapest, as previously described [1].
Dependent on clinical judgement, patients either received plasma exchange (PE) or plasma infusions (PIs), eculizumab (ECU) and supportive therapy. In cases where the C5-antibody ECU was used, it was administered according to the manufacturer’s instructions [11, 12].
Descriptive data are presented as count and frequency or as mean and standard deviation. We used MS Excel and IBM SPSS version 24.06 for data analysis.
RESULTS
We here report all nine prospectively followed pregnancies of three KTRs since 2010, who were enrolled in the Vienna TMA cohort and in a pregnancy outcome study. However, we excluded two other KTRs who conceived before 2010, although we have included some information on these cases in Supplementary data, Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4. Supplementary data, Tables S5 and S6 indicate the case numbers of our patients and pregnancies reported in other analyses of the Vienna TMA cohort [1, 2, 13].
Key demographic, genetic and kidney transplant-related data of three women with cTMA and pregnancies following KTX are indicated in Table 1. They were 21 ± 2 years of age at cTMA manifestation, 25 ± 1 years of age at KTX and 33 ± 4 years of age at their latest deliveries. Preventive plasma therapy was used in three pregnancies, and one patient had ongoing ECU therapy during two pregnancies. Seven out of nine pregnancies (78%) resulted in the delivery of healthy children at Week 38 ± 1 of gestation, all of them appropriate (AGA) or large for gestational age (LGA). Individual maternal and delivery outcomes are indicated in Tables 2 and 3. Table 4 depicts the immunosuppressive therapy before, during and after each pregnancy. The time course of serum creatinine and proteinuria is shown in Supplementary data, Figure S2.
Table 1.
Characteristic | Case I | Case II | Case III |
---|---|---|---|
Age at diagnosis of cTMA, years | 24 | 19 | 19 |
Native kidney biopsy | TMA | ND | TMA |
Therapy of cTMA | No | PE | PE |
Age at ESRD, years | 24 | 20 | 19 |
Type of dialysis therapy | HD | HD and PD | HD |
Age at KTX, years | 26 | 26 | 23 |
Deceased donor | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Donor age, years | 58 | 50 | 50 |
Donor sex | Female | Female | Female |
HLA-mismatch | 1-2-0 | 1-1-1 | 1-2-1 |
PRA/DSA | No | No | No |
Preemptive plasma therapy | No | PE/PI | PE/PI |
Serum creatinine at 4 weeks after KTX, mg/dL | 1.25 | 1.6 | 1.32 |
KTX vintage at last follow-up, years | 13 | 10 | 6 |
Total number of pregnancies before KTX | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Total number of pregnancies after KTX | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Age at first pregnancy following KTX, years | 30 | 29 | 28 |
Genetic variants | |||
CFH | c.1160-22_1160-19delTTAT, hetc | p.N516K, hetb | p.C1032a, heta |
CFH haplotype | – | H8, hom | H8, het |
c.331C>T, het | |||
CFI | p.I416L, heta | – | – |
c.482 + 6C>T, hetc | |||
CD46 | – | – | – |
CD46 haplotype | ggaac, het | ggaac, hom | ggaac, hom |
CFHR1,3 | del, het | – | del, het |
Genetic variant classification according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [14].
Pathogenic.
Likely pathogenic.
Uncertain significance.
ND, not done; HD, haemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; PRA, panel reactive antibodies; het, heterozygous; hom, homozygous; del, deletion.
Table 2.
Characteristic | Case-pregnancy number |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I-1 | I-2 | I-3 | I-4 | I-5 | II-1 | II-2 | III-1 | III-2 | |
Serum creatinine before pregnancy, mg/dL | 1.12 | 1.29 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 1.85 | 1.81 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Proteinuria before pregnancy, mg/g creatinine | 0 | 33 | 71 | 77 | 80 | 172 | 216 | 79 | 127 |
CKD stage before pregnancy | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G3bA1 | G3bA1 | G1A1 | G1A1 |
SBP before pregnancy, mmHg | 120 | 127 | 114 | 115 | 120 | 140 | 130 | 137 | 134 |
DBP before pregnancy, mmHg | 60 | 80 | 74 | 80 | 70 | 90 | 80 | 85 | 95 |
Pre-existing hypertension, yes/no | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Diabetes before pregnancy, yes/no | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
BMI before pregnancy, kg/m2 | 25 | 27 | 28 | 27 | 30 | 21 | 22 | 19 | 19 |
Smoking history before pregnancy, yes/no | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Smoking during pregnancy, yes/no | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Worsening of creatinine during pregnancy, yes/no | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Worsening of proteinuria during pregnancy, yes/no | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Worsening of CKD stage during pregnancy, yes/no | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Worsening of blood pressure during pregnancy, yes/no | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
Serum creatinine after pregnancy, mg/dL | 1.06 | 1.15 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.96 | 7.64 | 1.02 | 1.11 |
Proteinuria after pregnancy (persistent) | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
CKD stage after pregnancy | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G1A1 | G3bA2 | G5A3 | G1A1 | G1A2 |
SBP after pregnancy, mmHg | 130 | 130 | 116 | 115 | 138 | 140 | 130 | 125 | 130 |
DBP after pregnancy, mmHg | 90 | 100 | 78 | 80 | 96 | 90 | 80 | 84 | 87 |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BMI, body mass index.
Table 3.
Characteristic | Case-pregnancy number |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I-1 | I-2 | I-3 | I-4 | I-5 | II-1 | II-2 | III-1 | III-2 | |
Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2014 | 2016 | 2019 | 2013 | 2015 | 2018 | 2019 |
Outcome | Live birth | Live birth | IUFT | Live birth | Live birth | Live birth | Live birth | Miscarriage | Live birth |
Gestational age at birth, weeks | 37 + 3 | 40 + 3 | 33 + 3 | 36 + 0 | 38 + 2 | 38 + 3 | 38 + 0 | <12 weeks | 37 + 0 |
Mode of delivery | Vaginal | Vaginal | Vaginal | Vaginal (induced) | Vaginal | C-section | C-section | – | Vaginal |
Apgar score at 1/5/10 min | 9/10/10 | 9/10/10 | 0/0/0 | 7/8/9 | 9/10/10 | 9/10/10 | 9/10/10 | – | 8/10/10 |
Sex, female or male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Female | – | Male |
Birth weight, g | 3110 | 3956 | 2230 | 3410 | 4000 | 3030 | 3240 | – | 3082 |
Birth length, cm | 51 | 52 | 46 | 49 | 51 | 51 | 49 | – | 50 |
Head circumference, cm | 33 | 36 | 35 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 34 | – | 34 |
Assessment | AGA | AGA | AGA | LGA | LGA | AGA | AGA | – | AGA |
Admission to NICU, yes/no | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | – | No |
The mean birth weight was 3397 ± 370 g, mean birth length was 51 ± 1 cm and mean head circumference was 34 ± 1 cm.
NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; IUFT, intrauterine foetal death.
Table 4.
Case-pregnancy number | Preventive therapies |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial | Before pregnancy | During pregnancy | After pregnancy | |
I-1 | DAC, SIR, MMF, STR | CSA, AZA, STR | PI, CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR |
I-2 | – | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR |
I-3 | – | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR |
I-4 | – | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR |
I-5 | – | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR | CSA, AZA, STR |
II-1 | BAS, PE, TAC, MMF, STR | PI, CSA, AZA, STR | PI, CSA, AZA, STR | PI, CSA, AZA, STR |
II-2 | – | PI, CSA, AZA, STR | PI, CSA, AZA, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR |
III-1 | BAS, PE, TAC, MMF, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR |
III-2 | – | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR | ECU, CSA, AZA, STR |
DAC, daclizumab; BAS, basiliximab; SIR, sirolimus; TAC, tacrolimus; CSA, cyclosporin A; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; AZA, azathioprine; STR, steroid.
The first patient, a 26-year-old African woman with a history of cTMA, received a deceased donor kidney graft without preemptive plasma therapy in 2006. Three years later she became pregnant and received prophylactic PIs from the time of presentation in gestational Week 14 and continued throughout pregnancy. Kidney graft and neonatal outcome were excellent. Later, she received no preemptive plasma therapy during four additional pregnancies. Pregnancies two, four and five were uncomplicated. The third pregnancy was terminated at gestational Week 33 due to foetal death, which was most likely related to an intrauterine infection. There were no clinical or laboratory signs of a cTMA flare at this time.
At the time of transplantation, our second patient, a Caucasian woman, was 25 years of age with a history of 6 years of dialysis. At the age of 19 years, just 1 year after delivery of her first child, dialysis began due to biopsy proven cTMA, most likely triggered by a urinary tract and vaginal infection [15]. Transplantation was facilitated by plasma therapy for prevention of cTMA recurrence, which was never completely weaned off. During the first weeks after transplantation, several biopsies showed Banff borderline and Banff 2A lesions that were treated with steroids . The initial therapy with calcineurin inhibitors was then changed to an mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor.
Three years later, she had the wish to become pregnant and a surveillance biopsy showed no signs of rejection or TMA at this time. Four years after transplantation, she became pregnant with her second child and plasma therapy was intensified at Week 12 of gestation. A healthy boy was delivered by Caesarean section at gestational Week 38. Serum creatinine, proteinuria and blood pressure slightly increased towards the day of delivery but returned to baseline thereafter. A biopsy, taken at 12 weeks after gestation because of proteinuria and the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), showed no signs of humoral rejection or TMA. Plasma therapy was continued through her next pregnancy. In 2015, at the age of 32 years, her third pregnancy was uncomplicated until Week 30 of gestation. From this time point, creatinine, proteinuria and blood pressure increased, and she had several infections, but finally delivered a healthy girl by Caesarean section in gestational Week 38. She received 1600 mL of fresh frozen plasma before and on the day after delivery. She then developed a full-blown cTMA flare with an increase of serum creatinine >7 mg/dL due to a kidney transplant biopsy-proven TMA and received a first dose of ECU on Day 5 after delivery. Haematologic response was quickly achieved. Kidney transplant function improved significantly; however, it has not returned to pre-pregnancy levels despite ongoing treatment with ECU.
At the age of 24 years, the third patient, a Caucasian woman, received a deceased donor kidney after 4 years of dialysis therapy because of cTMA. Preventive plasma therapy was performed until 3 months after transplantation, when plasma intolerance prompted a change to preventive therapy with ECU. Kidney function was excellent, and 2 years later, in 2017, her first pregnancy was diagnosed around gestational Week 7, but she reported a spontaneous abortion before Week 12 of gestation. ECU was continued, and she became pregnant again, delivering a healthy child 1 year after her abortion. The dose of ECU was increased to 900 mg every week in Week 17 of gestation. Labour had to be induced at Week 37 + 0 of gestation because of a slight increase in blood pressure and proteinuria at the end of pregnancy. Details of complement-related analyses of the mother and the newborn were reported elsewhere [13]. A biopsy, taken 4 months after delivery because of persistent proteinuria and presence of DSA, did not show signs of humoral and cellular rejection or TMA; proteinuria improved thereafter.
DISCUSSION
Seven out of nine prospectively followed pregnancies (78%) after KTX resulted in the delivery of healthy children in three genetically high-risk cTMA patients. Preventive plasma therapy was used in three pregnancies, and one patient had ongoing ECU therapy during two pregnancies. Only one patient, who also received preventive plasma therapies, presented with a severe cTMA flare shortly after delivery, but ECU rescued kidney function.
As of September 2019, 51 patients with cTMA were enrolled in the Vienna TMA cohort, comprising a total of 212 prevalent and incident patients with primary and secondary TMAs (Supplementary data, Figure S1). About 23 of the 32 female patients with cTMA are currently in reproductive age, among them 8 with a kidney transplant, and excellent graft function in 6 cases. In young women, advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or dialysis dependence is associated with impaired fertility, which is rapidly restored after successful KTX [16–18]. This scenario of improved quality of life and excellent graft function enables uncomplicated pregnancies in most instances, like in our three cases.
In our kidney transplant centre, pregnancies and outcomes of mothers and children are followed prospectively [1, 19]. Preconception counselling is mandatory for mothers soon-to-be, and focuses on the risks of CKD, hypertension and immunosuppression for pregnancy and delivery outcomes. For the subgroup of patients with native kidney cTMA, counselling is even more delicate because of the risk of disease recurrence during or after pregnancy with all the potential harmful effects on the child’s and mother’s health, as well as transplant kidney function. The genetic risk profile and individual history also need consideration in these patients. In stable patients without signs of complement activation such as microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and without preemptive plasma or complement inhibition after transplantation, watchful waiting is an option. Other women may benefit from intensified plasma therapy [1] or from ongoing ECU therapy, such as Case III in this report. However, we recently discouraged pregnancy in a 30-year-old woman with cTMA (CFH p. S1191L, heterozygous; CFH-H3 risk haplotype, heterozygous) who received long-term prophylactic plasma therapy following KTX. She would have first needed assisted fertilization and second, presented with an increase of proteinuria and blood pressure after the switch of antihypertensive therapy and a change from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in preparation for a long-awaited pregnancy.
Limitations to this study include the different and somewhat inconsistent management of our patients, which is related to the very rare clinical setting we are reporting on. Although of interest with regard to the development of DSAs, we have not analysed human leucocyte antigen mismatches between the babies and grafts with the mothers.
In conclusion, becoming pregnant can be encouraged in KTRs with native kidney cTMA, given that kidney transplant function is excellent. Interdisciplinary care is mandatory and preemptive or therapeutic PE or complement blockade has to be initiated on an individual basis.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data are available at ckj online.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to our patients, who fully supported the data collection of their pregnancies and of their babies for this manuscript, and to Dorottya Csuka, Eszter Trojnár and Nóra Veszeli for genetic analyses. We also thank Leah Charlotte Piggott for language editing of the manuscript.
FUNDING
Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlicher Fonds des Bürgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien, Projekt-Nr: 14067.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gaggl M, Aigner C, Csuka D. et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies in women with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29: 1020–1029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aigner C, Böhmig GA, Eskandary F. et al. Preemptive plasma therapy prevents atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome relapse in kidney transplant recipients. Eur J Int Med 2019; 73: 51–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Burgner A, Hladunewich MA.. Women’s reproductive health for the nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 74: 675–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fakhouri F, Roumenina L, Provot F. et al. Pregnancy-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome revisited in the era of complement gene mutations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21: 859–867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Servais A, Devillard N, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. et al. Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and pregnancy: outcome with ongoing eculizumab. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 2122–2130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huerta A, Arjona E, Portoles J. et al. A retrospective study of pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int 2018; 93: 450–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meibody F, Jamme M, Tsatsaris V. et al. Post-partum acute kidney injury: sorting placental and non-placental thrombotic microangiopathies using the trajectory of biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019; DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz025 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Martin JN Jr, Bailey AP, Rehberg JF. et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in 166 pregnancies: 1955–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 98–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scully M, Thomas M, Underwood M. et al. ; orators of the UK TTP Registry. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and pregnancy: presentation, management, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Blood 2014; 124: 211–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aigner C, Schmidt A, Gaggl M. et al. An updated classification of thrombotic microangiopathies and treatment of complement gene variant-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy. Clin Kidney J 2019; 12: 333–337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.EMA. Soliris-EPAR-product Information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/soliris-epar-product-information_en.pdf (6 November 2019, date last accessed)
- 12.Legendre CM, Licht C, Loirat C.. Eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1379–1380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haninger-Vacariu N, Aigner C, Kain R. et al. Successful pregnancies during ongoing eculizumab therapy in 2 patients with complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy. Kidney Med 2019; 2: 213–217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S. et al. ; on behalf of the ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405–424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.George JN, Nester CM.. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 654–666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gill JS, Zalunardo N, Rose C. et al. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 1541–1549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deshpande NA, James NT, Kucirka LM. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2388–2404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hladunewich MA, Hou S, Odutayo A. et al. Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved pregnancy outcomes: a Canadian and United States cohort comparison. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25: 1103–1109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haninger N, Vacariu A, Schmidt A. et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental and anthropometrical outcome of children born to female kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 28: 349 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.