Skip to main content
American Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to American Journal of Epidemiology
. 2020 Oct 9;190(4):562–575. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa216

Associations of Depressive Symptoms With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality by Race in a Population of Low Socioeconomic Status: A Report From the Southern Community Cohort Study

Yong Cui, Wei Zheng, Mark Steinwandel, Hui Cai, Maureen Sanderson, William Blot, Xiao-Ou Shu
PMCID: PMC8024049  PMID: 33034339

Abstract

Depression is a leading cause of disability in the United States, but its impact on mortality rates among racially diverse populations of low socioeconomic status is largely unknown. Using data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2015, we prospectively evaluated the associations of depressive symptoms with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in 67,781 Black (72.3%) and White (27.7%) adults, a population predominantly with a low socioeconomic status. Baseline depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. The median follow-up time was 10.0 years. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for death in association with depressive symptoms. Mild, moderate, and severe depressive symptoms were associated with increased all-cause (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03, 1.22; HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.29; HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.28, respectively) and cardiovascular disease–associated death (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.44; HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.42; HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.75, respectively) in Whites but not in Blacks (P for interaction < 0.001, for both). Mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms were associated with increased rates of external-cause mortality in both races (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.46; HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.61; HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.81, respectively; for all study subjects, P for interaction = 0.48). No association was observed for cancer-associated deaths. Our study showed that the association between depression and death differed by race and cause of death in individuals with a low socioeconomic status.

Keywords: all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, depression, depressive symptoms, low-socioeconomic-status population, race, Southern Community Cohort Study

Abbreviations

CI

confidence interval

CESD-10

10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

CVD

cardiovascular disease

HR

hazard ratio

SCCS

Southern Community Cohort Study

SES

socioeconomic status

Depression, a leading cause of disability worldwide (1–3), is often associated with chronic medical conditions and impaired occupational functioning and quality of life, placing a heavy burden on families, communities, and health service systems (4–6). In 2017, approximately 17.3 million adults in the United States had at least 1 major depressive episode (7). Depression is increasing globally and is a major global health concern (8).

Depression and/or depressive symptoms have been associated with increased all-cause and certain cause-specific mortality, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD)–associated deaths (9–15). The vast majority of previous studies, however, were conducted in predominately White populations. Although Blacks are underrepresented in research and have less access to mental health services, particularly high-quality care, and are more likely to be exposed to a variety of stressors, studies have shown that Blacks have a lower lifetime risk of depression compared with Whites (16, 17). Low socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with 80% increased odds of depression in a meta-analysis (18). A wide racial gap in SES exists, which may affect psychological health and its association with death (16, 17). Research addressing racial differences relative to the depression–death association is scant, and results are mixed (19–22).

In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the associations of depressive symptoms with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among a cohort of Whites and Blacks with similar SES backgrounds. We also examined whether demographics, lifestyle factors, medical comorbidities, and religious factors modified the association between depression and death.

METHODS

Study population

We used resources from the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), a landmark epidemiologic study designed to investigate health disparities in a low-income and underserved population. Details of the study design and implementation have been reported (23). Briefly, between 2002 and 2009, the SCCS enrolled approximately 86,000 adults (approximately two-thirds of whom were Black), aged 40–79 years, living in 12 southeastern states. Approximately 86% of participants (n = 73,700) were recruited through community health centers that provide medical and preventive care mainly to medically underserved and low-income individuals. The remaining 14.3% were recruited from the general population via mailed surveys. The present study only included participants recruited from community health centers (n = 67,781; 72.3% Black and 27.7% White). Participants completed comprehensive baseline in-person interviews, conducted by trained interviewers, from which information on demographics, SES, lifestyle factors, medical histories, and depressive symptoms was collected. Race was self-reported. The SCCS was approved by the institutional review boards at Vanderbilt University and Meharry Medical College. All participants provided written informed consent.

Measurement of depressive symptoms

Baseline depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10), a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the current presence and severity of depressive symptoms (24–26), with a demonstrated measurement equivalency across a broad range of ages and ethnicities (27, 28). During baseline interviews, participants were asked how often they felt bothered, had trouble keeping their minds focused, felt depressed, felt that everything was an effort, felt fearful, slept restlessly, felt lonely, could not get going, felt hopeful, and were happy during the past week. Responses (4 categories to each item, score 0–3) to the CESD-10 were scored, with summarized scores ranging from 0–30. CESD-10 scores were then categorized as ranging from 0 to < 10, 10 to < 15, 15 to < 20, and ≥ 20, as indicating no, mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms, respectively (29, 30). In addition, participants were asked, “Has a doctor ever told you that you had depression?” (yes/no) and “Are you currently taking any antidepressant or antianxiety prescription medication, such as Prozac (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana), Zoloft (Pfizer, New York, New York), Paxil (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom) or Buspar (Mylans, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania)?” (yes/no).

Outcome ascertainment

The end points of our study were all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality, including deaths due to CVD, cancer, and external causes. Information on dates and causes of death was ascertained via linkage of the SCCS roster with both the Social Security Administration’s vital status service and National Death Index through December 31, 2015. Underlying causes of death were coded using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. Causes of death grouped into CVD-associated deaths included codes I00–I99, causes of death grouped into cancer-associated death included codes C00–C97, and external causes of death included codes V01–Y98 (31). Person-years of follow-up began on the participants’ enrollment date and continued through the date of death or December 31, 2015, whichever occurred first.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (means and proportions) were used to describe the distributions of study variables. The χ2 test (for categorical data) and analysis of variance (for continuous data) were applied to examine differences in participant characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause and cause-specific mortality associated with depressive symptoms. Adjusted covariates included age, race, sex, comorbidity score, marital status, educational attainment, annual household income, neighborhood deprivation index (32), cigarette-smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index (calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2)), amount of physical exercise (metabolic-equivalent hours per week), and spiritual/religious beliefs (including frequency of attending religious or faith-based services, perceived spirituality or religiosity, and “how much is religion, faith or God a source of strength and comfort to you?”). Comorbidity scores applied in the study were derived from a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, which summed the number of self-reported disease history on heart attack or coronary artery bypass surgery, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, tuberculosis, hepatitis, ulcer, diabetes, Parkinson disease, high cholesterol level, hypertension, arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, lupus, cancer, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (33, 34). Because depression diagnosis and antidepressant or antianxiety medications may influence the presence of depressive symptoms and, thus, CESD-10 scores, we also conducted sensitivity analyses by inclusion of these 2 factors in the Cox regression model to evaluate the influence of undiagnosed or uncontrolled depression symptoms on death. The trend test was evaluated by treating the depression score as a continuous variable in the analysis. Multiplicative interactions were evaluated by including the product terms of the depression score (continuous) and variables of interest in Cox regression models. All variables included in the analyses had very low rates of missing or unknown data (0%–1.0%). We assigned participants with missing or unknown data to the subgroup with the highest frequency. All analyses were conducted using Statistical Analysis Software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). All statistical tests were based on a 2-sided probability, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for 67,781 study participants was 10.0 years (interquartile range = 4 years). Table 1 lists characteristics of study participants. Participants’ mean age was 51.7 years at study enrollment, and the majority (61.4%) had annual household incomes of ˂ $15,000. Among all participants, 42.1% had at least mild symptoms of depression (CESD-10 score ≥ 10), 18.7% reported the current use of antidepressant or antianxiety medications, and 25.0% reported ever having been diagnosed with depression. Compared with Whites, Blacks were less likely to have moderate or severe depressive symptoms, be diagnosed with depression by a doctor, and currently taking antidepressant or antianxiety medications. Blacks were also less likely to be married, exercise regularly, have ever smoked cigarettes, and have comorbidity index scores ≥3; however, they were more likely to have educational levels less than high school, very low household incomes (< $15,000), have ever been alcohol drinkers, and live in neighborhoods with high deprivation index scores. In addition, Blacks were more likely to attend religious or faith-based services; use religion, faith, or God as sources of strength and comfort; and perceive self as spiritual or religious.

Table 1. Participant Characteristics at Baseline, Overall (n = 67,781), and by Race, the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2009.

Participant Characteristic All Participants, % Whites (n = 18,770, 27.7%), % Blacks (n = 49,011, 72.3%), % P Value a
Age at enrollment, yearsb 51.7 (8.8) 53.2 (9.2) 51.2 (8.5) <0.001
Depression according to CESD-10 scorec
 No depression 57.9 54.2 59.3
 Mild depression 23.2 21.2 24.0 <0.001
 Moderate depression 11.8 13.7 11.1
 Severe depression 7.1 10.9 5.6
Self-reported history of depression diagnosis by a doctor
 No 75.0 58.8 81.2 <0.001
 Yes 25.0 41.2 18.8
Current use of antidepressants or antianxiety medications
 No 81.3 66.6 86.9 <0.001
 Yes 18.7 33.4 13.1
Sex
 Male 39.6 34.7 41.5 <0.001
 Female 60.4 65.3 58.5
Annual household income, USD
 <15,000 61.4 57.3 63.0
 15,000–24,999 21.8 20.4 22.3
 25,000–49,999 11.9 13.8 11.1 <0.001
 ≥50,000 4.9 8.7 3.6
Education
 ≤ 11 years 32.0 29.0 33.2
 12 years, high school graduate, or equivalent 35.3 35.4 35.3 <0.001
 > High school 32.7 35.6 31.5
Marital status
 Married or living with partner 31.7 42.5 27.5
 Separated, divorced, or single and never married 68.3 57.5 72.5 <0.001
Body mass indexd
 <25.0 25.5 26.4 25.1
 25.0–29.9 28.8 28.6 28.9 0.002
 ≥30.0 45.7 45.0 46.0
Cigarette-smoking status
 Never smoker 34.8 30.6 36.4 <0.001
 Ever smoker 65.2 69.4 63.6
Alcohol consumption
 Never drinker 47.7 54.0 45.3
 Ever drinker 52.3 46.0 54.7 <0.001
Physical exercise (metabolic-equivalent hours/week), %
 No exercise 71.1 75.4 69.5
 Regular exercise
  0.1–7.4 5.1 3.6 5.6
  7.5–16.0 7.4 6.0 8.0 <0.001
  16.1–31.5 8.0 6.9 8.4
  >31.5 8.4 8.1 8.5

Overall, women, ever smokers, ever alcohol drinkers, nonexercisers, those who were unmarried, those living in more deprived neighborhoods, current users of antidepressant or antianxiety medications, those with very low incomes, less education, body mass index ≥35, comorbidities, no or less religious involvement (e.g., service attendance, perceived spirituality or religiosity), or self-reported history of depression were more likely to have higher CESD-10 scores compared with their counterparts (P < 0.001 for all) (Table 2). Whites had higher CESD-10 scores than did Blacks, in general and across almost all subgroups examined, with few exceptions, such as in subgroups of people who were current users of antidepressant or antianxiety medications, had incomes ≥ $50,000, had no comorbidities, and exercised regularly, where no significant differences were observed.

Table 2. CESD-10 Scores by Participant Characteristics, Overall (n = 67,781), and in Whites and Blacks; the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2009.

Variable CESD-10 Score, Mean (Standard Deviation) P1 Value a
Overall Whites (n = 18,770) Blacks (n = 49,011)
CESD-10 score overall and by race 9.2 (6.1) 10.0 (6.7) 8.9 (5.8) <0.001
Self-reported history of depression diagnosis by a    doctor
 No 7.9 (5.3) 7.7 (5.6) 8.0 (5.3) <0.001
 Yes 13.0 (6.5) 13.2 (6.9) 12.8 (6.3) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Current use of antidepressants or antianxiety    medications
 No 8.3 (5.6) 8.5 (6.1) 8.3 (5.4) <0.001
 Yes 12.9 (6.7) 12.9 (6.9) 12.8 (6.4) 0.23
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Sex
 Male 8.6 (5.6) 9.3 (6.2) 8.4 (5.3) <0.001
 Female 9.5 (6.4) 10.3 (6.9) 9.2 (6.1) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Education
 ≤11 years 10.2 (6.1) 11.3 (6.8) 9.9 (5.9) <0.001
 12 years, high school graduate or equivalent 9.3 (6.0) 10.1 (6.6) 8.9 (5.6) <0.001
 >High school 8.1 (5.9) 8.7 (6.5) 7.8 (5.6) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Annual household income, USD
 <15,000 10.0 (6.2) 11.2 (6.8) 9.6 (5.9) <0.001
 15,000–24,999 8.5 (5.6) 9.5 (6.3) 8.2 (5.4) <0.001
 25,000–49,999 7.4 (5.6) 8.0 (6.2) 7.0 (5.2) <0.001
 ≥50,000 5.4 (5.0) 5.8 (5.0) 5.7 (5.0) 0.31
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Marital status
 Married or living with partner 8.2 (5.9) 8.8 (6.3) 7.9 (5.6) <0.001
 Separated, divorced or single and never married 9.6 (6.1) 10.9 (6.8) 9.2 (5.8) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Body mass index, %c
 <25.0 9.2 (6.0) 9.6 (6.8) 9.1 (5.6) <0.001
 25.0–29.9 8.8 (5.9) 9.6 (6.6) 8.6 (5.7) <0.001
 ≥30.0 9.4 (6.2) 10.4 (6.7) 9.0 (5.9) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Cigarette smoking status
 Never smoker 8.5 (5.9) 8.9 (6.4) 8.3 (5.7) <0.001
 Ever smoker 9.6 (6.1) 10.4 (6.8) 9.2 (5.8) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Alcohol consumption
 Never drinker 9.0 (6.2) 10.1 (6.7) 8.5 (5.9) <0.001
 Ever drinker 9.4 (6.0) 9.9 (6.7) 9.2 (5.4) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 0.073 <0.001
Physical exercise (metabolic-equivalent    hours/week)
 No regular exercise 9.6 (6.2) 10.6 (6.8) 9.2 (5.9) <0.001
 Regular exercise
  0.1–7.4 8.4 (5.6) 8.5 (6.0) 8.3 (5.5) 0.33
  7.5–16.0 8.2 (5.6) 8.3 (6.1) 8.2 (5.4) 0.55
  16.1–31.5 8.1 (5.5) 8.0 (6.0) 8.1 (5.3) 0.63
  >31.5 8.2 (5.6) 8.0 (6.0) 8.2 (5.4) 0.23
   P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
How often attending religious or faith-based    services
 Never, holidays only, >4 times/year but <1/week 10.0 (6.2) 10.9 (6.8) 9.5 (5.8) <0.001
 At least once a week 8.4 (5.8) 8.5 (6.3) 8.3 (5.7) 0.002
  P1 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Perceived spirituality or religiosity
 Not at all, slightly, fairly spiritual or religious 9.9 (6.1) 10.6 (6.7) 9.6 (5.8) <0.001
 Very spiritual or religious 8.6 (6.0) 9.4 (6.7) 8.3 (5.7) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
How much is religion, faith, or God a source of    strength and comfort to you?
 Not very much, somewhat, quite a bit 10.2 (6.1) 10.8 (6.7) 9.9 (5.7) <0.001
 Great deal 8.7 (6.0) 9.3 (6.6) 8.5 (5.8) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Deprivation index (quartile)
 1 (least deprived) 8.7 (6.4) 9.2 (6.8) 8.1 (5.8) <0.001
 2 9.2 (6.3) 9.9 (6.8) 8.3 (5.7) <0.001
 3 9.2 (6.2) 10.0 (6.7) 8.5 (5.8) <0.001
 4 (most deprived) 9.3 (5.9) 10.4 (6.6) 9.1 (5.8) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Comorbidity index score
 0 7.8 (5.4) 7.6 (5.8) 7.8 (5.3) 0.11
 1–2 8.9 (5.9) 9.6 (6.6) 8.6 (5.7) <0.001
 ≥3 10.5 (6.4) 11.4 (6.9) 10.1 (6.1) <0.001
  P2 valueb <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Abbreviation: CESD-10, 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.

a

a  P1 value was derived from analysis of variance for testing differences in CESD-10 scores between Whites and Blacks.

b

b  P2 value was derived from analysis of variance for testing differences in CESD-10 scores between subgroups within a variable of interest.

c

c Weight (kg)/height (m2).

Table 1. Continued.

Participant Characteristic All Participants, % Whites (n = 18,770, 27.7%), % Blacks (n = 49,011, 72.3%), % P Value a
How often attending religious or faith-based services
 Never, holidays only, >4 times/year but <1/week 50.2 61.0 46.1 <0.001
 At least once a week 49.8 39.0 53.9
Perceived spirituality or religiosity
 Not at all, slightly, fairly spiritual or religious 44.0 48.1 42.5 <0.001
 Very spiritual or religious 56.0 51.9 57.5
How much is religion, faith, or God a source of strength and     comfort to you?
 Not very much, somewhat, quite a bit 30.8 44.8 25.4 <0.001
 Great deal 69.2 55.2 74.6
Deprivation index (quartile), %
 1 (least deprived) 8.3 16.7 5.1
 2 14.7 28.0 9.5 <0.001
 3 20.3 29.9 16.7
 4 (most deprived) 56.7 25.4 68.7
Comorbidity index score
 0 18.1 14.5 19.5
 1–2 50.8 47.0 52.3 <0.001
 ≥3 31.1 38.5 28.2

Abbreviation: CESD-10, 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.

a

a χ2 test (for categorical data) and analysis of variance (for continuous data) were used to test for significant differences in baseline depressive symptoms and other characteristics between Whites and Blacks.

b

b Values are expressed as mean (standard deviation).

c

c CESD-10 score: no depression, < 10; mild depression, 10–14.9; moderate depression, 15–19.9; severe depression, ≥ 20.

d

d Weight (kg)/height (m2).

Table 3 lists associations of depressive symptoms with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Overall, depressive symptoms were positively associated with all-cause mortality (P = 0.02), an association only seen in Whites (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03, 1.22; HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.29; HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.28, for mild, moderate, and severe depressive symptoms, respectively), but not in Blacks (P for interaction < 0.001). Cause-specific mortality analysis revealed 3 association patterns. For CVD, depressive symptoms were associated with an increased CVD-related death only in Whites (P = 0.003; HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.44, for mild depression; HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.42, for moderate depression; and HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.75, for severe depression). Analysis revealed null associations for data from Blacks and when Whites and Blacks were combined. Depressive symptoms were associated with increased rates of external-cause mortality overall (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.48, for mild depression; HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.62, for moderate depression; and HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.82, for severe depression) and in both Whites and Blacks (P for interaction = 0.49). For cancer, no associations were found for either race. Sensitivity analysis with additional adjustment for self-reported depression diagnosis and current use of antidepressant or antianxiety medications yielded very similar results (Web Table 1) (available at https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa216). To minimize the concern about potential reverse causation by baseline health status, we also conducted sensitivity analyses by excluding the first 2 years of cohort observation after study enrollment, and the aforementioned association patterns persisted (Web Table 2).

Table 3. Association of Depression With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality, Overall and by Race, (n = 67,781), the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2009.

Variable All Participants Whites Blacks
Event All aHR a 95% CI Event All aHR a 95% CI Event All aHR a 95% CI
All-cause death
 No depressionb 6,879 39,242 1.00 Referent 1,839 10,176 1.00 Referent 5,040 29,066 1.00 Referent
 Mild depression 3,032 15,716 1.05 1.00, 1.09 860 3,980 1.12 1.03, 1.22 2,172 11,739 1.02 0.97, 1.08
 Moderate depression 1,547 8,023 1.06 1.00, 1.12 584 2,567 1.17 1.06, 1.29 963 5,456 1.01 0.94, 1.09
 Severe depression 906 4,800 1.05 0.98, 1.13 446 2,047 1.15 1.03, 1.28 460 2,750 0.97 0.88, 1.07
  P for trendc 0.01 <0.001 0.81
  P for interactiond <0.001
Cardiovascular disease–related death
 No depressionb 2,178 39,242 1.00 Referent 497 10,176 1.00 Referent 1,686 29,066 1.00 Referent
 Mild depression 937 15,716 1.04 0.96, 1.13 249 3,980 1.23 1.05, 1.44 688 11,739 0.98 0.90, 1.08
 Moderate depression 457 8,023 1.03 0.93, 1.15 153 2,567 1.18 0.98, 1.42 304 5,456 0.98 0.87, 1.12
 Severe depression 269 4,800 1.05 0.92, 1.20 138 2,047 1.43 1.17, 1.75 131 2,750 0.85 0.71, 1.02
  P for trendc 0.36 0.003 0.27
  P for interactiond <0.001
Cancer death
 No depressionb 1,722 39,242 1.00 Referent 473 10,176 1.00 Referent 1,285 29,066 1.00 Referent
 Mild depression 672 15,716 0.99 0.91, 1.09 177 3,980 1.03 0.86, 1.23 496 11,739 0.98 0.88, 1.09
 Moderate depression 316 8,023 0.96 0.85,1.09 114 2,567 1.03 0.83, 1.27 202 5,456 0.92 0.79, 1.07
 Severe depression 167 4,800 0.90 0.77, 1.06 71 2,047 0.85 0.65, 1.10 96 2,750 0.92 0.74, 1.13
  P for trendc 0.13 0.27 0.16
  P for interactiond 0.17
Death due to external causes
 No depressionb 390 39,242 1.00 Referent 154 10,176 1.00 Referent 236 29,066 1.00 Referent
 Mild depression 222 15,716 1.25 1.06, 1.48 83 3,980 1.21 0.93, 1.59 137 11,739 1.26 1.02, 1.56
 Moderate depression 125 8,023 1.32 1.32, 1.62 64 2,567 1.39 1.03, 1.89 61 5,456 1.24 0.93, 1.65
 Severe depression 86 4,800 1.42 1.12, 1.82 56 2,047 1.47 1.47, 2.03 30 2,750 1.31 1.31, 1.93
  P for trendc <0.001 0.004 0.03
  P for interactiond 0.49

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

a Adjusting for age at enrollment, race, sex, education, household income, marital status, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, comorbidity index score, deprivation index score, frequency of attending religious or faith services, perceived spirituality or religiosity, and use of religion, faith, or God as a source of strength and comfort.

b

b CESD-10 score: no depression, < 10; mild depression, 10–14.9; moderate depression, 15–19.9; severe depression, ≥ 20.

c

c  P for trend refers to P for trend that was evaluated by treating CESD-10 score as a continuous variable in the analysis.

d

d  P for interaction refers to P value for interaction between depressive symptoms (CESD-10 score, continuous variable) and race (White, Black).

We further examined associations between depressive symptoms and CVD-related death in Whites stratified by demographics, SES, lifestyle, comorbidity index, and religious factors (Table 4). The association of depression with CVD-related death was modified by income and comorbidity; a stronger association was observed among individuals with annual household incomes >$15,000, or those with ≥3 comorbidities. In general, depression symptoms were not positively associated with CVD death across subgroups of Black participants (data not shown). Analyses did not reveal any significant 3-way interactions (data not shown).

Table 4. Association Between Depression and Cardiovascular Disease–Related Death in Whites Stratified by Sociodemographic-, Lifestyle-, Religion-, and Health-Related Factors, (n = 18,770), the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2009.

Variable Symptom Severity P for interaction c
Mild Depression a Moderate Depression a Severe Depression a
Event All aHR b 95% CI aHR b 95% CI aHR b 95% CI
Sex
 Female 508 12,256 1.24 0.99, 1.56 1.09 0.84, 1.43 1.35 1.03, 1.78 0.42
 Male 529 6,514 1.21 0.97, 1.50 1.24 0.96, 1.62 1.51 1.12, 2.04
Educational level
 <High school 380 5,450 1.16 0.90, 1.50 0.96 0.70, 1.32 1.37 1.00, 1.87 0.35
 ≥High school 657 13,320 1.27 1.04, 1.55 1.31 1.04, 1.66 1.44 1.11, 1.88
Annual income, USD
 <15,000 716 10,745 1.18 0.98, 1.42 1.08 0.87, 1.34 1.27 1.00, 1.60 0.03
 ≥15,000 321 8,025 1.34 1.00, 1.80 1.42 0.99, 2.04 2.00 1.35, 2.97
Marital status
 Married or living with partner 384 7,982 1.02 0.78, 1.34 1.12 0.81, 1.54 1.30 0.89, 1.89 0.54
 Separated, divorced, or single    and never married 653 10,788 1.37 1.13, 1.66 1.22 0.97, 1.54 1.51 1.19, 1.92
Body mass index, %d
 <25.0 238 4,959 1.09 0.78, 1.54 1.39 0.96, 2.03 1.11 0.71, 1.75
 25.0–29.9 289 5,364 1.19 0.89, 1.59 0.95 0.63, 1.41 1.53 1.04, 2.25 0.36
 ≥30.0 510 8,447 1.33 1.06, 1.66 1.22 0.93, 1.58 1.54 1.16, 2.03
Regular exercise    (metabolic-equivalent    hours/week)
 <7.5 897 14,826 1.26 1.07, 1.49 1.20 0.98, 1.46 1.44 1.16, 1.78
 7.5–31.5 93 2,431 0.83 0.48, 1.44 0.54 0.23, 1.28 1.20 0.53, 2.70 0.20
 >31.5 47 1,513 1.66 0.78, 3.53 2.12 0.92, 4.85 2.56 0.93, 7.06
Alcohol consumption
 Never drinker 638 10,142 1.26 1.03, 1.53 1.21 0.95, 1.53 1.38 1.06, 1.79 0.98
 Ever drinker 399 8,628 1.19 0.92, 1.53 1.10 0.81, 1.49 1.48 1.08, 2.03
Cigarette-smoking status
 Never smoker 225 5,745 1.48 1.06, 2.06 1.57 1.05, 2.35 1.76 1.09, 2.84 0.64
 Ever smoker 812 13,025 1.17 0.98, 1.40 1.09 0.88, 1.35 1.36 1.09, 1.69
Comorbidity index score
 0 71 2,725 1.28 0.70, 2.34 1.42 0.65, 3.09 0.72 0.17, 3.03
 1–2 600 12,171 1.08 0.83, 1.41 1.20 0.88, 1.65 1.05 0.71, 1.56 0.04
 ≥3 356 3,716 1.33 1.09, 1.64 1.15 0.90, 1.47 1.66 1.30, 2.13
Attending religious or faith-based    services
 Never or occasional 663 11,443 1.29 1.06, 1.57 1.18 0.93, 1.48 1.58 1.25, 1.99 0.37
 ≥1/week 374 7,327 1.14 0.88, 1.48 1.20 0.86, 1.66 1.07 0.70, 1.63
How much is religion, faith, or    God a source of strength and    comfort to you?
 Not very much, somewhat,    quite a bit 522 8,400 1.26 1.01, 1.57 1.14 0.88, 1.48 1.55 1.18, 2.03 0.83
 Great deal 515 10,370 1.21 0.97, 1.52 1.25 0.95, 1.64 1.29 0.95, 1.75
Perceived spirituality or    religiosity
 Not at all, slightly, fairly spiritual    or religious 530 9,033 1.25 1.01, 1.56 1.09 0.84, 1.42 1.47 1.12, 1.92 0.97
 Very spiritual or religious 507 9,737 1.20 0.96, 1.51 1.27 0.97, 1.67 1.35 1.00, 1.83
Deprivation index
 Less than the median (less    deprived) 413 8,394 1.07 0.82, 1.39 1.45 1.10, 1.93 1.55 1.14, 2.12 0.16
 Greater than the median (more    deprived) 624 10,376 1.32 1.09, 1.60 1.02 0.79, 1.31 1.36 1.04, 1.77

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CESD-10, 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CI, confidence interval.

a

a CESD-10 score: no depression, <10.0; mild depression, 10.0–14.9; moderate depression, 15.0–19.9; severe depression, ≥ 20.0.

b

b Adjusting for age and other variables included in the table.

c

c  P for interaction refers to P for interaction between depressive symptoms (CESD-10 score, continuous variable) and variables of interest.

d

d Weight (kg)/height (m2).

Because no racial differences were observed for depression-related external-cause death, effect modifications were evaluated by combining data from Whites and Blacks (Table 5). Significant effect modifications were observed for education, exercise, and comorbidity score. The association of depression and external-cause death was stronger among individuals who had educational levels of high school or more, reported high levels of exercise (metabolic-equivalent hours/week > 31.5), or had no comorbidities.

Table 5. Association between Depression and External-Cause Death in All Participants, Stratified by Sociodemographic-, Lifestyle-, Religion-, and Health-Related Factors, (n = 67,781), the Southern Community Cohort Study, 2002–2009.

Variable Symptom Severity P for interaction c
Mild Depression a Moderate Depression a Severe Depression a
No. of Events All aHR b 95% CI aHR b 95% CI aHR b 95% CI
Sex
 Female 306 40,912 1.24 0.93, 1.66 1.32 0.95, 1.84 1.56 1.10, 2.20 0.47
 Male 517 26,869 1.25 1.02, 1.53 1.31 1.00, 1.71 1.28 0.89, 1.81
Educational level
 <High school 284 21,710 1.33 1.01, 1.75 1.20 0.85, 1.69 1.01 0.65, 1.58 0.04
 ≥High school 539 46,071 1.18 0.85, 1.46 1.38 1.06, 1.79 1.68 1.26, 2.26
Annual income, USD
 <15,000 581 41,614 1.25 1.03, 1.53 1.32 1.04, 1.68 1.37 1.03, 1.81 0.56
 ≥15,000 242 26,167 1.22 0.89, 1.68 1.29 0.84, 1.97 1.64 0.99, 2.73
Marital status
 Married or living with partner 207 21,470 1.44 1.03, 2.00 1.29 0.82, 2.02 1.52 0.90, 2.56 0.98
 Separated, divorced, or single    and never married 616 46,311 1.19 0.98, 1.45 1.32 1.05, 2.67 1.39 1.06, 1.84
Body mass index, %d
 <25.0 313 17,270 1.02 0.77, 1.34 1.07 0.75, 1.51 1.38 0.94, 2.05 0.89
 25.0–29.9 270 19,504 1.61 1.21, 3.15 1.74 1.22, 2.48 1.59 1.01, 2.49
 ≥30.0 240 31,007 1.22 0.89, 1.67 1.28 0.88, 1.86 1.32 0.85, 2.05
Regular exercise    (metabolic-equivalent    hours/week)
 <7.5 604 51,614 1.09 0.89, 1.32 1.14 0.89, 1.45 1.25 0.95, 1.65 <0.001
 7.5–31.5 134 10,491 1.41 0.95, 3.14 1.75 1.05, 2.90 1.34 0.61, 2.98
 >31.5 84 5,676 2.63 1.57, 4.40 2.51 1.31, 4.82 4.14 1.98, 8.65
Alcohol consumption
 Never drinker 278 32,339 1.40 1.05, 1.87 1.26 0.87, 1.83 1.52 1.01, 2.28 0.76
 Ever drinker 545 35,442 1.18 0.96, 1.45 1.35 1.05, 1.73 1.38 1.02, 1.88
Cigarette-smoking status
 Never smoker 144 23,569 1.18 0.79, 1.75 1.23 0.74, 2.06 0.77 0.35, 1.70 0.16
 Ever smoker 679 44,212 1.27 1.05, 1.52 1.34 1.07, 1.68 1.54 1.19, 2.00
Comorbidity index score
 0 172 12,297 1.66 1.17, 2.36 1.56 0.94, 2.56 2.87 1.64, 5.04 0.03
 1–2 388 34,438 1.10 0.86, 1.41 1.12 0.82, 1.53 1.30 0.90, 1.87
 ≥3 263 21,046 1.19 0.87, 1.61 1.42 1.01, 1.99 1.20 0.20, 1.80
Attending religious or faith-based    services
 Never or occasional 512 34,014 1.30 1.05, 1.61 1.34 1.03, 1.73 1.46 1.09, 1.96 0.64
 At least once a week 311 33,767 1.16 0.88, 1.53 1.29 0.91, 1.82 1.43 0.85, 2.10
How much is religion, faith, or    God a source of strength and    comfort to you?
 Not very much, somewhat,    quite a bit 335 20,847 1.15 0.87, 1.05 1.39 1.02, 1.73 1.42 0.99, 2.05
 Great deal 488 46,933 1.32 1.07, 1.64 1.25 0.94, 1.66 1.42 1.02, 1.97 0.68
Perceived spirituality or    religiosity
Not at all, slightly, fairly spiritual or    religious 444 29,846 1.30 1.03, 1.62 1.34 1.01, 1.77 1.47 1.05, 2.04 0.71
Very spiritual or religious 379 37,935 1.17 0.97, 1.59 1.29 0.95, 1.76 1.39 0.97, 2.00
 Deprivation index
Less than the median (less    deprived) 215 15,569 1.36 0.98, 1.89 1.20 0.79, 1.82 1.23 0.79, 1.82 0.77
Greater than the median (more    deprived) 608 52,212 1.21 1.00, 1.47 1.36 1.07, 1.73 1.51 1.13, 2.01

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CESD-10, 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CI, confidence interval.

a

a CESD-10 score: no depression, <10.0; mild depression, 10.0–14.9; moderate depression, 15.0–19.9; severe depression, ≥ 20.0.

b

b Adjusting for age and other variables included in the table.

c

c  P for interaction refers to P for interaction between depressive symptoms (CESD-10 score, continuous variable) and variables of interest.

d

d Weight (kg)/height (m2).

DISCUSSION

Substantial evidence shows that depression and/or depressive symptoms are risk factors for all-cause mortality. In a meta-analysis of 293 studies conducted in 35 countries, depression was associated with a 50% increased risk of death (9). In the United States, most of the existing evidence was derived from predominantly White populations, and very few studies have investigated racial differences regarding the influence of depressive symptoms on death outcomes (19, 22). The American’s Changing Lives study, a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of 3,361 US adults aged ≥ 65 years, with 34.4% Black participants, showed that depressive symptoms were associated with increased all-cause mortality and death from renal diseases only among Whites, not Blacks (22, 35, 36). Similarly, a recent study with 43% Black participants reported that depressive symptoms were associated with higher all-cause mortality among Whites but not Blacks (19). In our analysis of 67,719 SCCS participants, 72.3% of whom were Black, and with an average 10 years of follow-up, we found a statistically significant association of depression, with approximately a 15% increased risk of all-cause mortality in Whites and a null association in Blacks. We found positive associations between depression and all-cause and CVD-associated mortality that existed in Whites, even when depression symptoms were mild, consistent with previous reports (37, 38). Our data support the notion that depressive symptoms influence death differently between Whites and Blacks, with Whites being primarily affected.

Depression and/or depressive symptoms have been consistently associated with CVD risk and poor outcomes (11–14), although few studies have examined potential racial differences in the associations. In our study, we found that depression was associated with increased CVD-related mortality rates only in Whites. Our finding is supported by the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative longitudinal survey of 15,845 US adults, aged ≥ 50 years (15.2% Black participants), in whom, after an average 9.2 years of follow-up, depressive symptoms were statistically significantly associated with elevated total CVD-associated mortality rates in Whites but not in Blacks (21). However, the Chicago Health and Aging Project, involving 12 years of follow-up of 6,158 community-dwelling, older (aged ≥ 65 years) adults (62% Black), reported that depressive symptoms were associated with a 2-fold elevated CVD-associated mortality rate only in Blacks.

Biological and behavioral mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain the potential link between depression and CVD risk (39, 40). Depression has been associated with increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, platelet activation, and inflammatory markers, as well as endothelial dysfunction and decreased heart rate variability, leading to the development of dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and nonfatal CVDs—chronic medical conditions that are well-established risk factors for CVDs (39). Depression has also been associated with poor adherence to cardiovascular medications and unhealthy lifestyle factors, such as physical inactivity and smoking, which may mediate the association between depression and poor prognosis (40). In our study, we found that the association of depression and CVD-related death was modified by income and comorbidity score in Whites but not in Blacks, suggesting that sociodemographic and health factors have different influences on depression outcomes in Whites and Blacks. We did not observe that other lifestyle factors (e.g., smoking, drinking, religious beliefs/practices) modified the depression–CVD association.

Prior studies investigating the relationship between depression and death resulting from cancer have generated mixed findings (41–44). In a recent meta-analysis, researchers reported that depression was associated with increased overall mortality rates among patients with cancer; however, only in approximately 40% of included studies were the results controlled for age and sex, and when only studies that controlled for potential confounding factors (at least for age and sex) were analyzed, no statistically significant associations were observed (10). We found, after comprehensively controlling for potential confounding factors, particularly SES, that depressive symptoms were not associated with increased cancer-related mortality rates in both Whites and Blacks.

Information on the association of depressive symptoms with external-cause death in underserved groups is seriously lacking. We confirmed results of an earlier report from the SCCS (34) that depression was associated with increased mortality rates due to external causes in White people and Black people. Interestingly, we observed that associations of depression with external-cause death vary with physical exercise status. Regular exercise has been associated with reduced all-cause mortality and death resulting from CVD in the general population (45). The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommends 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity exercise, or 75 minutes/week of vigorous-intensity exercise as the minimum amount required to maintain or improve health (46). However, it is unclear whether this recommendation applies to subgroup populations, such as individuals with depression. In the SCCS, although the association between depression and CVD-related death was not modified by exercise, the association for external-cause death was substantially stronger among those with a higher level of physical activity. The reason (or reasons) for this interaction is unclear but could be related to a greater accident potential among those with high levels of recreational physical activity. The association of depression with external-cause death was also stronger among individuals without comorbidities and those who had higher education levels. More research is needed to reveal the underlying mechanisms.

In previous studies and our study, the prevalence of depression was lower in Blacks than Whites, although Blacks are more frequently exposed to a wide range of stressors (17). The underlying mechanisms for this paradoxical phenomenon, however, remain to be determined. It has been suggested that religious practices (e.g., service attendance, religious coping) may have a protective effect against depression (17, 47, 48). Assari et al. (17) have shown that religious social support may protect against depression among Blacks more so than Whites. In line with previous studies, we found in the SCCS that attending or being involved in religious or faith-based services was associated with lower depression scores for Whites and Blacks. We also found that Blacks were more likely to attend religious or faith-based services; use religion, faith, or God for strength and comfort; and perceive themselves as very spiritual or religious. However, we did not find that religious practices modified the depression–death association for all-cause or cause-specific mortality.

This study has a number of strengths. The SCCS participant cohort comprises primarily Black adults and White adults of low SES, which provides a unique opportunity for investigating health-related racial disparities less confounded by SES than in other studies. The large sample size of the study and rich baseline information about demographics, SES, lifestyle, and health-related variables allowed us to evaluate many potential confounding factors and effect modifiers. Furthermore, the prospective design, with essentially complete follow-up for death, minimized selection bias.

Our study also has several limitations. First, we only had 1 depression measure, which limited our ability to evaluate the impact of change of depressive symptoms on death. Second, there may be many potential sources of residual not accounted for in our study. For example, we did not have detailed information on depression treatment and coexisting mental diseases. Also, the influence of unmeasured confounders cannot be ruled out. Third, although the CESD-10 is widely used and recognized as a well-established instrument for measuring depressive symptoms, the validity of the instrument has not been evaluated in the SCCS, which comprises a population of mostly Black and low-income participants. The association we found for mild depression symptoms may have partly resulted from less-than-optimal depression measurements. Last, but not least, although our study is the largest study to date, to our knowledge, in which racial differences were investigated for associations of depression with death and potential modifications by demographic and lifestyle factors, the statistical power of our study may not be great enough to detect 3-way interactions.

In summary, we found that racial differences exist regarding the impact of depressive symptoms on all-cause and CVD-related mortality, with White participants being more vulnerable to the effects of depression in the low-SES population. We also demonstrated that depressive symptoms are associated with increased mortality rates due to external causes, but not with cancer-related death, regardless of race. In addition, our study raises the possibility that certain sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health factors may modify the association of depressive symptoms with death, such as income and comorbidity for CVD-related death, and education, exercise, and comorbidity for external-cause death.

Supplementary Material

Web_Material_kwaa216

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Author affiliations: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States (Yong Cui, Wei Zheng, Hui Cai, William Blot, Xiao-Ou Shu); International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States (Mark Steinwandel, William Blot); and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, United States (Maureen Sanderson).

This work was funded by US National Institutes of Health (grant U01 CA202979 to the Southern Community Cohort Study).

We thank the study participants and research team members for their contributions to the study and Dr. Mary Shannon Byers for technical support in preparing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. World Health Organization . “Depression: let’s talk" says WHO, as depression tops list of causes of ill health. March 30, 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/world-health-day/en/. Accessed October 1, 2019.
  • 2. Kessler  RC, Bromet  EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:119–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):743–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Johnston  KM, Powell  LC, Anderson  IM, et al.  The burden of treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review of the economic and quality of life literature. J Affect Disord. 2019;242:195–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Daly  EJ, Trivedi  MH, Wisniewski  SR, et al.  Health-related quality of life in depression: a STAR*D report. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2010;22(1):43–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Greenberg, Fournier  AA, Sisitsky  T, et al.  The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(2):155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. National Institute of Mental Health . Major depression. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression.shtml. Accessed January 3, 2021.
  • 8. World Health Organization . Depression. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression/. Accessed October 1, 2019.
  • 9. Cuijpers  P, Vogelzangs  N, Twisk  J, et al.  Comprehensive meta-analysis of excess mortality in depression in the general community versus patients with specific illnesses. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(4):453–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Machado  MO, Veronese  N, Sanches  M, et al.  The association of depression and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meijer  A, Conradi  HJ, Bos  EH, et al.  Adjusted prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: individual patient data meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(2):90–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. van  Melle  JP, de  Jonge  P, Spijkerman  TA, et al.  Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(6):814–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Barth  J, Schumacher  M, Herrmann-Lingen  C. Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(6):802–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Nicholson  A, Kuper  H, Hemingway  H. Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 6,362 events among 146,538 participants in 54 observational studies. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(23):2763–2774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zheng  D, Macera  CA, Croft  JB, et al.  Major depression and all-cause mortality among white adults in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;7(3):213–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Williams  DR, González  HM, Neighbors  H, et al.  Prevalence and distribution of major depressive disorder in African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites: results from the National Survey of American life. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(3):305–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Assari  S, Lankarani  MM. Secular and religious social support better protect blacks than whites against depressive symptoms. Behav Sci (Basel). 2018;8(5):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lorant  V, Deliège  D, Eaton  W, et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(2):98–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tuot  DS, Lin  F, Norris  K, et al.  Depressive symptoms associate with race and all-cause mortality in patients with CKD. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;4(2):222–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lewis  TT, Guo  H, Lunos  S, et al.  Depressive symptoms and cardiovascular mortality in older black and white adults: evidence for a differential association by race. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(3):293–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Capistrant  BD, Gilsanz  P, Moon  JR, et al.  Does the association between depressive symptoms and cardiovascular mortality risk vary by race? Evidence from the health and retirement study. Ethn Dis. 2013;23(2):155–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Assari  S. Depressive symptoms increase the risk of mortality for white but not black old adults. Healthcare (Basel). 2018;6(2):36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Signorello  LB, Hargreaves  MK, Blot  WJ. The Southern Community Cohort Study: investigating health disparities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21(1 Suppl):26–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Thomas  JL, Jones  GN, Scarinci  IC, et al.  The utility of the CES-D as a depression screening measure among low-income women attending primary care clinics. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2001;31(1):25–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Radloff  L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measur. 1977;1(3):385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Schroevers  MJ, Sanderman  R, van  Sonderen  E, et al.  The evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: depressed and positive affect in cancer patients and healthy reference subjects. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(9):1015–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nelson  CJ, Cho  C, Berk  AR, et al.  Are gold standard depression measures appropriate for use in geriatric cancer patients? A systematic evaluation of self-report depression instruments used with geriatric, cancer, and geriatric cancer samples. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):348–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nguyen, Kitner-Triolo  M, Evans  MK, et al.  Factorial invariance of the CESD in low socioeconomic status African Americans compared with a nationally representative sample. Psychiatry Res. 2004;126(2):177–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Andresen  EM, Malmgren  JA, Carter  WB, et al.  Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Osborn  CY, Trott  HW, Buchowski  MS, et al.  Racial disparities in the treatment of depression in low-income persons with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(5):1050–1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10.htm. Accessed October 1, 2019.
  • 32. Signorello  LB, Cohen  SS, Williams  DR, et al.  Socioeconomic status, race, and mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(12):e98–e107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Charlson  ME, Pompei  P, Ales  KL, et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sonderman  JS, Munro  HM, Blot  WJ, et al.  Suicides, homicides, accidents, and other external causes of death among blacks and whites in the Southern Community Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Assari  S, Moazen-Zadeh  E, Lankarani  MM, et al.  Race, depressive symptoms, and all-cause mortality in the United States. Front Public Health. 2016;4:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Assari  S, Burgard  S. Black-white differences in the effect of baseline depressive symptoms on deaths due to renal diseases: 25 year follow up of a nationally representative community sample. J Renal Inj Prev. 2015;4(4):127–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Worcester  MU, Goble  AJ, Elliott  PC, et al.  Mild depression predicts long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a 25-year follow-up. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(12):1812–1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bush  DE, Ziegelstein  RC, Tayback  M, et al.  Even minimal symptoms of depression increase mortality risk after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(4):337–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Carney  RM, Freedland  KE. Depression and coronary heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(3):145–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Cohen  BE, Edmondson  D, Kronish  IM. State of the art review: depression, stress, anxiety, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28(11):1295–1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zonderman  AB, Costa  PT  Jr, McCrae  RR. Depression as a risk for cancer morbidity and mortality in a nationally representative sample. JAMA. 1989;262(9):1191–1195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Batty  GD, Russ  TC, Stamatakis  E, et al.  Psychological distress in relation to site specific cancer mortality: pooling of unpublished data from 16 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2017;356:j108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Onitilo  AA, Nietert  PJ, Egede  LE. Effect of depression on all-cause mortality in adults with cancer and differential effects by cancer site. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(5):396–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Stommel  M, Given  BA, Given  CW. Depression and functional status as predictors of death among cancer patients. Cancer. 2002;94(10):2719–2727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Arem  H, Moore  SC, Patel  A, et al.  Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):959–967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion . 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Report. https://health.gov/our-work/physical-activity/previous-guidelines/2008-physical-activity-guidelines/advisory-report/. Accessed October 1, 2019.
  • 47. Taylor  RJ, Chatters  LM, Abelson  JM. Religious involvement and DSM-IV 12-month and lifetime major depressive disorder among African Americans. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012;200(10):856–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chatters  LM, Taylor  RJ, Lincoln  KD, et al.  Religious coping among African Americans Caribbean blacks and non-Hispanic whites. J Community Psychol. 2008;36(3):371–386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web_Material_kwaa216

Articles from American Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES