Abstract
Manifestations of an atypical variant of medulloblastoma of the posterior fossa in extra-axial locations have been reported, and key questions concerning its interpretation have been raised previously. This review illustrated the clinico-radiological and histopathological features of the posterior fossa extra-axial medulloblastoma and described possible management strategies. We thoroughly reviewed all atypical anatomical locations of medulloblastoma reported within the posterior fossa and extra-axial spaces. The main characteristics of diagnostic imaging and histopathological results, primarily the distinctive radiopathological characteristics, were summarized to distinguish between intra- and extra-axial medulloblastoma, or pathologies mimicking this tumor. Most cases of posterior fossa extra-axial medulloblastoma have been reported in the cerebellopontine angle, followed by the tentorial and lateral cerebellar locations. The dural tail sign, which is commonly observed in meningioma, is rarely seen in intra- or extra-axial medulloblastoma and might be associated with other benign or malignant lesions. In addition to magnetic resonance imaging, the proposed new imaging techniques, including advances in modern neuroimaging modalities, were discussed, as potentially efficient modalities for characterizing extra-axial medulloblastoma. Radionuclide imaging and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging are practical alternatives to limit the number of differential diagnoses. We believe that medulloblastoma cases are likely under-reported because of publication bias and frequent tumors in unusual locations. Addressing these issues would help establish a more accurate understanding of this entity.
Keywords: Cerebellopontine angle, Lateral cerebellum, Tentorium cerebelli, Foramen magnum, Medulloblastoma
Key points
Medulloblastoma is a common brain tumor; therefore, understanding its variations is crucial.
Neuroimaging is helpful in the preoperative neuroaxis evaluation and postoperative assessment of medulloblastoma.
Identifying and categorizing metastatic disease during diagnosis is paramount for effective therapy.
Deciphering this challenging diagnosis can reflect positively on a patient’s prognosis.
Background
Medulloblastomas, which are undifferentiated embryonal neuroepithelial tumors, originate from primitive multipotent cells of the cerebellum and spread to the germ cell migration tract [1]. Other sites of origin of medulloblastomas have also been reported, including the lateral medullary velum and the cerebellar flocculus [2]. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) Classification from 2016 integrates a modular diagnostic approach with the incorporation of genetically defined entities of medulloblastomas, regardless of their anatomical locations. According to this classification, there are four genetic (molecular) groups of medulloblastoma: the wingless (WNT)-activated and the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH)-activated groups, and the groups numerically designated as “group 3” and “group 4” [3].
Notably, medulloblastomas are common malignancies in pediatric patients, accounting for 25% of all brain tumors of childhood, typically arising from the cerebellar vermis. In contrast, adulthood medulloblastomas are typically observed within the paramedian region or laterally within the cerebellar hemisphere, and account for < 1% of primary brain tumors among adults [1].
Recently, advanced neuroimaging techniques have revealed the presence of medulloblastoma in extra-axial locations [1, 2]. The hypothesis behind the origin of extra-axial variations remains controversial. One study postulated that they originated from primary multipotential cells in the cerebellum and propagated to the germ cell [1]. Other reports have suggested a possible origin from the cerebellar flocculus migration tract or the outer granular layer in the neuroepithelial roof of the fourth ventricle [2, 4]. Clinically, medulloblastomas manifest with nonspecific symptoms, such as headache, fatigue, vomiting, and cerebellar dysfunction. During disease progression, symptoms of increased intracranial pressure (i.e., lethargy, vomiting, seizures, and vision and behavior changes) predominate [5].
Radiologically, medulloblastoma appears as a contrast-enhanced hyperdense region on a computed tomography (CT) scan, often compressing the fourth ventricle; iso- to hypointense on T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images; and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images [2]. A characteristic diffusion restriction is predominantly observed on MR images because of its high cellularity and a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio [6]. MR spectroscopy typically reveals a small taurine peak, a high choline peak, an increase in the choline/creatinine and choline/N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) ratios, and a decreased NAA peak [6, 7]. Primitive evidence suggested group-specific spectral patterns, with high taurine peaks and low levels of lipids in “group 3” and “group 4,” and high choline and lipid peaks in SHH-activated medulloblastoma with only trace or absent taurine peaks [8]. Microscopic analyses indicated that adult and pediatric variants of medulloblastoma appear identical, with the desmoplastic variant occurring predominantly in adulthood [9, 10]. Medulloblastomas are characterized by the presence of heterogenous densely packed blue cell tumors, with round to oval, highly hyperchromic nuclei surrounded by scant cytoplasm. In addition, DNA microarrays reveal a distinct gene expression pattern, suggesting that medulloblastoma is not a primitive neuroectodermal tumor [11].
Combined therapy, consisting of a maximally radical surgery followed by chemotherapy and adjuvant irradiation of the entire central nervous system, is typically recommended [12]. Prognosis is essentially dependent on the genetic and molecular subtype, with the worst prognosis observed in “group 3” and the best observed in the WNT-activated subtype [13]. This review elucidated the characteristics of the posterior fossa extra-axial variations of medulloblastoma in comparison with the typical intra-axial medulloblastoma in terms of their clinical features, imaging characteristics, histologic subtypes, and prognosis. Furthermore, we illustrated similar lesions, summarizing the differences based on the characteristics of a variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases that present as masses in the posterior fossa extra-axial regions.
Search strategy
We searched for articles published in PubMed until August 2020. Search strings consisted of a combination of the following terms: “medulloblastoma,” “extra-axial,” and “exophytic growth.” The literature search was conducted by three board-certified radiologists among the authors (AMS, AHA, SSS). In total, 27 articles met our eligibility criteria (Table 1). These reports conformed to our definition of extra-axial medulloblastoma, as a process occurring separately and apart from the brain parenchyma, rather than a mere surface-localized exophytic growth. Additionally, we compared these parameters with those of extra-axial mimicking lesions and typical intra-axial medulloblastoma.
Table 1.
Summary of the posterior fossa extra-axial medulloblastomas documented in the PubMed database, which could aid to distinguish from typical intra-axial medulloblastoma
| No | Authors | Origin | Age/sex | CT characteristics | MR characteristics | Management | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumar et al. [2] | CPA | 9 years/M | Hyperdense mass on plain scans, with heterogeneous enhancement | T1: hypointense; T2: heterogenous; CEMR: mass enhancement | Tumor excision; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | Died |
| CPA | 8 years/M | Iso-to hypodense mass with heterogeneous enhancement | – | Tumor excision; radiotherapy | Died | ||
| CPA | 20 years/F | – | T1 and T2: heterogeneous signal; CEMR: heterogeneous enhancement | Tumor excision; radiotherapy | Improved | ||
| CPA | 24 years/M | Heterogenous mass | – | Subtotal resection; chemotherapy | Died | ||
| 2 | Spina et al. [5] | CPA (2 cases) |
22 years/M 26 years/F |
– | T2/FLAIR: hyperintense; CEMR: heterogeneous enhancement | Total excision; radiotherapy | Improved |
| 3 | Fallah et al. [9] | CPA | 47 years/M | Homogenously enhancing mass with well-defined borders | – | Total excision; radiotherapy | – |
| 4 | Furtado et al. [10] | CPA | 32 years/M | Hyperdense mass on plain scan | T1: hypointense; T2: mixed intensity; CEMR: heterogenous enhancement + dural tail sign; MRS: choline and taurine peak increase and creatine peak decrease | Total excision; radiotherapy | Improved |
| 5 | Bhaskar et al. [12] | CPA | Infant/M | Hyperdense mass on plain scans | T1: hypointense; T2: isointense; CEMR: intense homogenous enhancement | Total excision | Died, postoperative day 20 |
| 6 | Yamada et al. [16] | CPA | 19 years/F | Hypoattenuated mass with homogenous enhancement | T1: hypointense; CEMR: mass enhancement | Subtotal resection; immunotherapy and radiotherapy | Improved, with no recurrence |
| 7 | Akay et al. [17] | CPA | 21 years/M | Heterogenous high attenuation | T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: heterogeneous | Subtotal resection; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | Improved |
| 8 | Jaiswal et al. [18] | CPA (14 cases) | 3–53 years/seven M and six F | Heterogeneous attenuation with necrosis | T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: heterogenous | Seven patients: Total excision; seven patients: subtotal resection; total eight patients received chemotherapy |
Follow-up: nine cases Recurrence: two cases Symptom-free: seven cases |
| 9 | Becker et al. [22] | CPA (two cases) and tentorial (three cases) | 28–52 years/one M and four F | – | Heterogenous signal intensity and enhancement | – | – |
| 10 | Meshkini et al. [23] | Lateral cerebellar | 19 years/F | – | CEMR: heterogenous intense enhancement with cystic changes | Tumor resection | – |
| CPA | 7 years/F | – | CEMR: heterogenous intense enhancement with cystic changes | Tumor resection | – | ||
| 11 | Doan et al. [24] | Tentorial | 29 years/M | – | CEMR: homogenous enhancement + dural tail sign | Subtotal resection; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | – |
| 12 | Presutto et al. [25] | Lateral cerebellar | 33 m/M | Mildly hyperattenuating on plain scans, with homogenous enhancement | T2/FLAIR: hyperintense; DWI: restricted diffusion | Total resection | Improved |
| 13 | Chung EJ, et al. [26] | Lateral cerebellar | 5 years/M | – | T1: isointense; T2: isointense; CEMR: homogeneous enhancement | Tumor excision; radiotherapy | Improved |
| 14 | Pant I et al. [45] | CPA | 15 years/M | T2: heterogeneous signal intensity with necrotic areas/cystic degeneration; CEMR: heterogeneous enhancement; DWI: restricted diffusion | Tumor resection | – | |
| 15 | Gil-Salu et al. [49] | CPA | 40 years/M | Homogeneously enhancing mass | Homogenous enhancement | Total excision; adjuvant therapy | – |
| 16 | Singh et al. [50] | CPA | 21 years/M | Heterogeneously non-enhancing mass | Heterogenous signal intensity and enhancement | Total excision | Recurrence and metastasis at 15 months |
| 17 | Bahrami et al. [51] | CPA | 23 years/M | – | T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: heterogenous | Total excision; radiotherapy | Improved |
| 18 | Mehta et al. [52] | CPA | 40 years/M | – | Heterogenous enhancement | Subtotal resection; radiotherapy | Improved |
| 19 | Ahn et al. [53] | CPA | 9 m/F | – | T1: hypointense; T2: hypointense; CEMR: heterogenous | Subtotal resection; possible chemotherapy and Radiotherapy | Died after 2 months |
| 20 | Naim-ur-Rahman et al. [54] | CPA | 3 years/F | Heterogeneously enhancing mass | – | Tumor excision | Improved |
| 21 | Izycka-Swieszewska et al. [55] | CPA | 26 years/F | Homogenous enhancement | T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: homogenous enhancement | Tumor excision | – |
| 22 | Park et al. [56] | CPA | 15 years/M | Hyperdense mass causing internal auditory canal dilation | T1: hypointense; T2: hypointense; CEMR: heterogenous | Subtotal resection; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | Improved |
| 23 | Santagata et al. [57] | CPA | 17 years/F | Hyperdense mass forming a flat surface against the posterior aspect of the left petrous bone and tentorium | CEMR: heterogeneous enhancement | Tumor excision; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | – |
| 24 | Nyanaveelan et al. [58] | CPA | 5 years/F | Mass eroding the petrous bone | – | Tumor excision; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | – |
| 25 | Yoshimura et al. [59] | CPA | 29 years/F | – | T1: isointense; T2/FLAIR: Hyperintense; CEMR: No enhancement; DWI: restricted diffusion; MRS: high ratio of choline‐to‐N‐acetyl aspartate | Subtotal resection; chemotherapy and radiotherapy | Improved |
| 26 | Cugati et al. [60] | CPA | 4 years/F | Contrast-enhancing extra-axial mass in the CPA, centered around the internal acoustic meatus | T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: intense enhancement | Tumor excision | – |
| 27 | Kumar et al. [61] | CPA | 9 years/F |
Isodense to hypodense mass in the right CPA Homogenous enhancement |
T1: hypointense; T2: hyperintense; CEMR: brilliant enhancement | Tumor excision; radiotherapy | Improved |
CEMR contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance, FLAIR fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Discussion of clinical review results
“Extra-axial variant of medulloblastoma” is a descriptive term indicating that the lesion originates externally to the brain parenchyma and not from an exophytic outgrowth, beyond the pial surface (i.e., it can originate from the skull, meninges, cranial nerves, and brain appendages) [14]. Based on our extensive literature review, the posterior fossa extra-axial variations of medulloblastoma are classified according to their exact topographic location, with a categorical quantification of the reviewed cases regarding the overall percentage of participants’ sex, age, tumor location, and treatments administered (Figs. 1, 2, 3) for a better comprehension of the disease process, as follows:
Fig. 1.
Participant distribution according to sex (a) and age (b) (pediatric, age < 18 years; adult, age ≥ 18 years)
Fig. 2.

Tumor locations and their corresponding prevalence
Fig. 3.

Overview of followed treatment protocols and their corresponding prevalence
Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) location
The CPA is an extra-axial wedge-shaped cisternal space bounded by the lateral petro-temporal bone, cerebellum, and brain stem medially, as well as by the inferior cranial nerves (CN IX, X, and XI) [15]. Most posterior fossa extra-axial medulloblastomas are reported to be located in the CPA. In total, 43 (86%) of the cases were found from the PubMed database when writing this review. Twenty-six of them were of adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years) with a male predominance (25 cases) (Table 1). One hypothesis claimed that these medulloblastomas arise from the remnants of the external granular layer of the cerebellar hemisphere, or from the proliferating residue of the lateral medullary velum, where it meets the CPA [16]. Another hypothesis suggests a lateral spread to the CPA through the foramen of Luschka or from a direct exophytic growth of the lesion in the cerebellum or the pons [16]. No sex predilection has been identified [16].
There are various clinical presentations of CPA medulloblastomas, which are difficult to distinguish from those of other CPA neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions [16]. Interestingly, the short-term duration of symptoms and progression of brainstem dysfunction and hydrocephalus suggest that the lesions originate from the parenchyma, rather than from extra-axial regions. The commonly encountered clinical manifestations are headache, vomiting, nausea, and cerebellar signs, while hearing deficits and facial nerve involvement are infrequently encountered and may occur as late manifestations [17, 18]. Rarely, extra-axial CPA medulloblastoma may present with a dural-based appearance with hyperostosis, simulating a petrosal meningioma [10]. A few studies have also identified cystic changes, calcifications, and metastases in cases of CPA medulloblastomas [16]. The most common CPA neoplasm is vestibular schwannoma, which accounts for 90% of such cases, followed by meningioma and epidermoid inclusion cyst [17]. The aggressive nature of this tumor and the short duration of its symptoms suggest that a differential diagnosis is needed to distinguish a medulloblastoma and an atypical hypercellular lesion in the CPA (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical and imaging features of common pathologies mimicking medulloblastoma
| Diagnosis | Common features |
|---|---|
| Meningioma |
Short duration of symptoms, lack of cranial nerve involvement, and bony hyperostosis A well-demarcated lesion Follow the gray matter signal intensity |
| Cholesteatoma |
A destructive lesion with bony erosion Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted images |
| Nerve sheath tumor |
Destruction of the internal auditory canal Follow the signal intensity of the white matter Cystic degeneration and hemorrhagic components are common |
| Epidermoid inclusion cyst |
Follow the signal intensity of CSF with incomplete FLAIR suppression Restricted diffusion and no enhancement on post-contrast images |
| Metastasis |
History of a primary malignant lesion Metastatic work-up to look for other masses |
| Primary bone tumor | Bony origin with erosion and a calcification or ossification pattern |
| Choroid plexus papilloma |
Well-defined lesion located in the foramen of Luschka Feathery appearance with restricted diffusion and intense postcontrast enhancement |
| Hemangioblastoma |
Young and middle-aged adults High intrinsic vascularity, as evidenced by high rCBV values on perfusion MRI If multiple, strong association with VHL syndrome |
| Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor | Heterogenous solid-cystic mass occurring off-midline in children < 3 years of age |
| Pilocytic astrocytoma |
Cystic lesion with a pathognomonic mural nodule Hypodense on CT images |
CSF cerebrospinal fluid, FLAIR fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, rCBV relative cerebral blood volume, MRI magnetic resonance images, VHL Von Hippel-Lindau, CT computed tomography
The primary components of CPA medulloblastoma are two molecular subgroups, including WNT-activated and SHH-activated medulloblastoma [19]. CPA medulloblastoma in adult patients appears to have a favorable prognosis. However, a poor prognosis is observed in pediatric patients [20]. We present the case of a 7-year-old child who was diagnosed with the WNT-activated type of medulloblastoma based on imaging and post-surgical pathology results (Fig. 4). Two-year follow-up after adjuvant therapy revealed no recurrence.
Fig. 4.
A A 7-year-old child was sent to our hospital with a suspected brain tumor. Unenhanced brain CT scan with the axial (a) and sagittal (b) reformats. There is a well-defined hyperdense complex mass in the posterior fossa (asterisks). The mass is centered on the right CPA and surrounded by a fissure of the CSF (cleft sign), proving its extra-axial origin (arrowheads). It induces a mass effect on the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere, middle cerebellar peduncle, and pons (benched arrows), resulting in obstructive hydrocephalus. CPA cerebellopontine angle, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CT computed tomography. B Brain MRI images without (a, c-d) and with intravenous contrast (b). There is a sizeable multilobulated mass located at the right CPA (asterisks). The T1-weighted (not shown) and coronal T2-weighted images (a) show iso-signal intensity relative to the gray matter. Following contrast administration, an avid enhancement was depicted (b; sagittal T1 fat saturated), with restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted images (c, d). This mass exerts a significant mass effect on the brain stem (arrow; b) with the resultant obstructive hydrocephalus (benched arrow; a). The entire neuro-axial imaging was not remarkable (not shown). MRI magnetic resonance imaging, CPA cerebellopontine angle. C Histopathological analysis following surgery with various magnifying powers. (a) A highly cellular tumor was showing undifferentiated cells with variable growth patterns, including small uniform round carrot-shaped cells with hyperchromatic and cytoplasmic nuclei. (b) Distinct fibrillary background composed of cellular processes corresponding to the embryonic class of medulloblastoma
Tentorial location
The cerebellar tentorium is a crescent-shaped dural reflection that extends across the posterior cranial fossa, separating the occipital and temporal brain hemisphere from the cerebellum and the infratentorial brainstem [21].
The tentorial location is considered to be the second most common location of medulloblastomas after the CPA. The presence of medulloblastomas at this location was first described by Becker et al. [22] in 1995. Only four adult cases (8%) were found in the PubMed database in the present search, with an equal male to female ratio (Table 1). Medulloblastomas in this or in the lateral cerebellar location are difficult to differentiate from meningiomas or other pathologies, especially when the medulloblastomas exhibit dural tail signs (Table 2) [10, 23]. Histopathological analysis revealed the SHH-activated subgroup among all cases of medulloblastomas in this location [24]. Overall, a high degree of suspicion should be raised when considering medulloblastomas in the differential diagnoses of an adult patient with an extra-axial tentorial midline mass with atypical features. The prognosis of tentorial medulloblastoma remains uncertain because of the small number of reported cases and the short-term follow-up examination period. We present the case of a 17-year-old male who was diagnosed with the SHH-activated type of medulloblastoma based on imaging and post-surgical pathology results (Fig. 5). One-year follow-up after adjuvant therapy revealed no recurrence.
Fig. 5.
A A 17-year-old male was suspected of having an intracranial tumor. Brain CT scan without (a) and with intravenous contrast administration (b, c). There is a left-sided, well-defined, large, hyperdense lateral cerebellar mass (asterisks), with diffuse homogenous enhancement after contrast administration (b, c). The mass induces a mass effect on the cerebellum (black arrowheads), brain stem (benched arrows), and fourth ventricle (white arrowheads). Therefore, blockage causes obstructive hydrocephalus. CT computed tomography. B Brain MRI without and with intravenous contrast administration. A solid mass lesion involving the tentorial base (asterisks) is depicted. Regarding the gray matter, solid components display an iso intensity on T1-weighted image (a, b), and a high signal intensity on T2-weighted image (not shown). Diffusion-weighted images demonstrate restricted diffusion (c, d). Post-contrast images demonstrate peripheral nodular enhancement (arrowheads) (e, f). Neuroaxis imaging was unremarkable (not shown). MRI magnetic resonance imaging. C Histopathological analysis following surgery with various magnifying powers. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin staining at different magnifications reveal large neoplastic cells of marked anaplasia and large nuclei with evident nucleoli. (b) The cell wrapping and necrotic phenomena are present. The ultimate diagnosis was medulloblastoma, with a large type of anaplastic cells (WHO grade IV). WHO World Health Organization
Lateral cerebellar location
The lateral cerebellar region, which includes the retro-cerebellar region, is considered the third most common location after the CPA and tentorial regions. This site is bounded beyond the border of the lateral cerebellar hemisphere and also includes the retro-cerebellar site and is marginated by the mastoid part of the temporal and occipital bones. It is an extremely rare location for an extra-axial medulloblastoma. Medulloblastoma cases in this location were first reported by Meshkini et al. [23] in 2014. The reports were found through PubMed during our research and included only three patients (6%, i.e., two adult cases and one pediatric case of medulloblastoma [male:female ratio, 2:1]; Table 1) [24–26].
Medulloblastomas in this location are assumed to arise from the remnants of the external granular layer in the cerebellar hemisphere. Similar to medulloblastomas at the tentorial location, it is difficult to differentiate medulloblastomas in this region from meningiomas or other pathologies, especially when medulloblastomas exhibit dural tail signs, which is usually observed in meningiomas in this or in the tentorial location (Table 2). The lateral cerebellar medulloblastoma prognosis remains uncertain because of the small number and short-term follow-up period of the reported cases [10, 24]. We present the case of a 17-year-old male diagnosed with medulloblastoma of a nodular desmoplastic type based on imaging and post-surgical pathology results (Fig. 6). Three-year follow-up after adjuvant therapy revealed no recurrence.
Fig. 6.
A A 17-year-old male suspected of having an intracranial tumor. Brain CT without (a) and with contrast medium (b–d). A left-sided, well-defined, large, hyperdense lateral cerebellar mass (asterisks) with diffuse homogenous enhancement with contrast medium (b–d) exerts mass effect on the fourth ventricle (white arrowheads), cerebellum (black arrowheads), and brain stem (benched arrows). It also causes ballooning of the temporal horns of the lateral ventricles, indicating obstructive hydrocephalus. CT computed tomography. B Brain MRI without and with intravenous contrast medium. A well-defined mass centered in the lateral cerebellar region (asterisks) is observed, showing hypointense signal on T1-weighted imaging (a) and hyperintense signal on T2-weighted imaging (b). Post-contrast images demonstrate diffuse heterogeneous enhancement (c, d) with restricted diffusion (e, f). The mass causes buckling of the cerebellar parenchyma, folia (white arrowheads). Moreover, a rim of cerebrospinal fluid cleft at the periphery denotes extra-axial localization (black arrowhead; b). It has a mass effect on the brain stem, contralateral cerebellar hemisphere, and fourth ventricle (arrow), resulting in obstructive hydrocephalus. Additionally, it exerts a mass effect over the ipsilateral dural venous sinus system (benched arrows). The neuroaxis imaging finding was unremarkable (not shown). C Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis (single-voxel technique). A prominent choline peak, a high choline/creatinine ratio, and a decreased NAA peak are observed. The taurine peak is not evident at 3.25 or 3.43 ppm. D Post-surgery histopathological analysis at various magnifications. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin staining show classic nodular tumor cells. Small basophilic tumor cells exhibit diffuse growth and are arranged in trabeculae, sheets, and nests. (b) The tumor cells have round or oval nuclei with deeply stained chromatin and a high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio with mitotic figures and partial necrosis. The final diagnosis is medulloblastoma of a nodular desmoplastic type (WHO grade IV). WHO World Health Organization
Foramen magnum location
The foramen magnum is the largest foramen of the skull, which is located in the most inferior part of the cranial pit as a part of the occipital bone [27]. The foramen magnum location has not been reported previously as a separate origin of extra-axial medulloblastomas. Nevertheless, many of the previously reviewed locations exhibit medulloblastoma extension through the foramen magnum without a clear sign of origin [28]. This is particularly true for lesions that originate from the CPA with caudal descent [28, 29]. These lesions might present as a physical pit in the brain (i.e., a morphological change), and the diagnostic neuroradiologist should be attentive for such an exceedingly uncommon occurrence [30]. A multidisciplinary approach that considers the clinic-radio-pathological correlations could lead to a more accurate diagnosis. We present the case of a 15-year-old female with a nonspecific controversial diagnosis of low-grade tumor who died before operating on her (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
A A 15-year-old girl presented with nausea and vomiting. Brain CT scan without contrast administration in axial (a), sagittal (b), and coronal (c) reformats. A well-defined heterogeneous mass was observed centered in the foramen magnum with a marginal extension on the right side (asterisks). It shows homogenous density and extends below the foramen magnum caudally (arrows). It induces a mass effect on the inferior aspect of the cerebellar hemisphere and medulla oblongata, resulting in obstructive hydrocephalus. CT computed tomography. B Brain MRI without and with intravenous contrast medium. The figure indicates a lobulated, heterogeneous, solid mass, centered within the foramen magnum (asterisks). This lesion shows mixed heterogeneous intensity with predominantly iso-to-hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (a), high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging (not shown), and heterogeneous enhancement after contrast medium administration (b). Diffusion-weighted images demonstrate restricted diffusion (c, d). It induces a mass effect over the medulla oblongata with resultant hydrocephalus (arrow; a). The findings of neuroaxis imaging were unremarkable (not shown). MRI magnetic resonance imaging. C Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis (single-voxel technique) for a female pediatric patient presented with nausea and vomiting. There is a high NAA peak, a low choline peak, and choline to creatinine ratio. The taurine peak is not evident at 3.25 or 3.43 ppm. NAA N-acetyl aspartate
Advanced medical imaging for intra-axial and extra-axial medulloblastoma
Recently, there have been tremendous advances in diagnostic neuro-oncology. Accordingly, it is currently possible to detect this devastating tumor at an earlier stage. For example, in vivo detection of the receptor status using positron emission tomography (PET) scan on mothers has enabled diagnosticians to anticipate the potential consequences.
Updates in radionuclide imaging
Although at present, radionuclide imaging is not the primary diagnostic modality for intracranial tumors, primarily limited by its low specificity and low spatial resolution. In 1998, Müller et al. [31] evaluated potential applications of radionuclide-based imaging techniques for children with medulloblastoma. Radionuclide imaging is useful in detecting various intracranial tumors, including meningioma, pituitary adenoma, hemangioblastomas, gliomas, and medulloblastomas [32, 33]. Furthermore, the continued growth of tumor-specific radiotracers makes it very functional. For instance, a new radiotracer, 3-deoxy-3-[18F] fluorothymidine (FLT), is a molecule that is preceded by thymidine kinase-1 during phase S of mitosis. This tracer is distinct in that there is an uptake in setting a disrupted blood–brain barrier, which makes it very helpful and specific in detecting and determining the grade of brain tumors since higher-grade cancers are associated with greater disruption of the blood–brain barrier [34, 35].
Radionuclide imaging has a limited potential in identifying medulloblastoma from differentiated diagnoses. However, the fusion of CT or MRI images with PET images can improve PET’s ability to diagnose and distinguish post-radiotherapy changes from tumor recurrence [36]. This is employed by the increase in cellular activity and glucose uptake in neoplasms relative to normal cells [37]. For instance, medulloblastomas have a limited potential for uptake in thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose PET (tumor-to-normal uptake ratio) [36, 38].
Radionuclide imaging shows a limited potential capability in diagnoses and identification of medulloblastomas compared with differential diagnoses, and medulloblastomas have a limited potential for uptake in thallium-201 single-photon emission CT and fluorodeoxyglucose PET (tumor-to-normal uptake ratio) [39].
Updates in advanced MR imaging
Dynamic perfusion parameters have recently been evaluated for their potential diagnostic roles in neuro-oncology, especially for lesions of predominantly nonnecrotic solid tumors [27, 40, 41].
Dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging of medulloblastomas has revealed increased permeability, with the cerebral blood volume ratios close to 1 [40], particularly in desmoplastic cases. The findings significantly contradict those obtained from other differential diagnoses of enhancing the posterior fossa tumors [40].
Medulloblastomas are considered as tumors with the greatest relative tumor blood flow (Fig. 8), which can be used to distinguish medulloblastomas from pilocytic astrocytomas. The observation may complement diffusion-weighted imaging and help accurately distinguish these tumors [27].
Finally, it is noteworthy that the characteristic arterial spin-labeling perfusion patterns have been studied among diverse pathologic types of brain tumors in children. These studies have revealed that the maximum relative tumor blood flow of high-grade tumors (grades III and IV) is significantly higher than that of low-grade tumors (grades I and II) [27, 41].
Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value analysis can facilitate preoperative identification of medulloblastoma from its differentials, as well as grading of pediatric medulloblastoma [42, 43]. Further, it can facilitate optimal surgical treatment planning, with reduction of surgery-induced morbidity [43, 44].
The ADC ratio—the proportion between the mean ADC observed in the tumor and the mean ADC observed in the contralateral white matter—is a simple tool used to distinguish juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas, ependymomas, and medulloblastomas [45]. In particular, the ADC ratio cut-off value was set below 1, as 1 was characteristic for medulloblastoma with 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity [44, 46].
MRS based on the metabolic pattern can be used to identify medulloblastomas (Figs. 6C, 7C). A recent observational study of 111 medulloblastoma patients revealed a predictive accuracy of 95% for the SHH-activated group, 78% for group 4, 56% for group 3, and 41% for the WNT-activated group. Reflecting on specific preoperative features of MRI/MRS enabled the prediction of a molecular subgroup of medulloblastoma using a five-metabolite subgroup classifier (creatine, myoinositol, taurine, aspartate, and lipid) [46].
MR perfusion is a distinguishing modality for posterior fossa diagnosis. In 2014, Yeom et al. [39] clarified the effect of maximal relative tumor blood flow (rTBF) on tumor grade (low vs. high grade) and found a difference in the range of rTBF between medulloblastomas (0.98 and 4.97) and pilocytic tumors (1.05 ± 0.18). In addition, medulloblastomas showed higher rTBF values compared to ependymomas, with an overlap between these two tumors because of the perfusion variability of the former [39]. Koob et al. [47] quantified the perfusion map parameters, i.e., the tumor-to-parenchyma ratios for relative enhancement, maximum enhancement, maximum relative enhancement, time to peak, and AUC values for medulloblastoma, which was significantly higher than ependymoma parameters (p < 0.05). A maximum cut-off enhancement value of 100.25 was used to distinguish between medulloblastoma and ependymoma (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 100%) [47]. In 2020, Gaudino et al. [48] examined the data of 246 brain tumor patients by calculating the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and the mean percentage of signal recovery (PSR). The optimum rCBV value threshold was 1.77 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 85%; PPV, 84%; NPV, 100%) [48].
Fig. 8.
Advanced MRI imaging for medulloblastoma. Axial FLAIR (a) and DWI (b) display an extra-axial mass occupying the lateral and retrocerebellar regions, demonstrating a high signal in FLAIR with restricted diffusion in DWI. Axial T1 after contrast administration (c) demonstrates strong heterogeneous contrast enhancement of the mass. DSC-MR perfusion maps (d–f) show increased vascularization in the mass, with increased blood flow (d) and high value of rCBV (e) of the mass than the normal parenchyma. DWI diffusion-weighted image, DSC dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced, rCBV relative cerebral blood volume
Conclusions
Clinical assessment and neuroimaging findings are insufficient in obtaining an accurate preoperative diagnosis of extra-axial medulloblastomas because of shared features between medulloblastomas and other common pathologies. Most reported cases of posterior fossa extra-axial medulloblastomas are located in the CPA. Radionuclide and arterial spin-labeling imaging are newer and significantly useful techniques for the diagnosis and recurrence detection of medulloblastomas. Moreover, the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 might be a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target for medulloblastomas. We believe that cases of medulloblastomas are likely under-reported because of publication bias and a tendency to report usual tumors at unusual locations. The information provided in this review would help establish a more accurate understanding of these lesions as one of the essential roles of a neuroradiologist is to detect the tumor and possible subarachnoid spread, which determines and guides the surgical approach.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- CPA
Cerebellopontine angle
- WNT
Wingless-activated
- SHH
Sonic Hedgehog-activated
- CT
Computed tomography
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- ADC
Apparent diffusion coefficient
Authors' contributions
AMS is the first author and the principle investigator of the whole project. AHA and SSS gathered the data, drafted the manuscript, and revised it critically for important intellectual content. WMI, FZ, FAK, MAT, TAJ, and FA made substantive contributions to the conception and invention, as well as acquisition and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable. This is a review of publicly available information.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable, as this is a review article.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication of the manuscript was obtained from Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Menon G, Krishnakumar K, Nair S. Adult medulloblastoma: clinical profile and treatment results of 18 patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15:122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumar R, Achari G, Banerjee D, Chhabra D. Uncommon presentation of medulloblastoma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001;7:538–542. doi: 10.1007/s003810100446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stevenson L, Echlin F. Nature and origin of some tumors of the cerebellum: medulloblastoma. Arch NeurPsych. 1934;31:93–109. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1934.02250010105005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Spina A, Boari N, Gagliardi F, Franzin A, Terreni MR, Mortini P. Review of cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27:316–320. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2012.741733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wilke M, Eidenschink A, Müller-Weihrich S, Auer DP. MR diffusion imaging and 1H spectroscopy in a child with medulloblastoma: a case report. Acta Radiol. 2001;42:39–42. doi: 10.1080/028418501127346440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brandão LA, Poussaint TY. Posterior fossa tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017;27:1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blüml S, Margol AS, Sposto R, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma identification using noninvasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuro Oncol. 2015;18:126–131. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fallah A, Banglawala SM, Provias J, Jha NK. Extra-axial medulloblastoma in the cerebellopontine angle. Can J Surg. 2009;52:E101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Furtado SV, Venkatesh PK, Dadlani R, Reddy K, Hegde AS. Adult medulloblastoma and the “dural-tail” sign: rare mimic of a posterior petrous meningioma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111:540–543. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, et al. Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumor outcome based on gene expression. Nature. 2002;415:436–442. doi: 10.1038/415436a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bhaskar MK, Jaiswal M, Ojha BK, et al. Extra-axial cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma in an infant. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2017;52:122–126. doi: 10.1159/000455921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sure U, Berghorn WJ, Bertalanffy H, et al. Staging, scoring and grading of medulloblastoma. a postoperative prognosis predicting system based on the cases of a single institute. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;132:59–65. doi: 10.1007/bf01404849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ammirati M, Scerrati A. Surgical techniques in benign extra-axial tumors. From bench to bedside. In: Signorelli F, editor. Trauma, tumors, spine, functional neurosurgery. London: InTechOpen; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stricsek GP, Evans JJ, Farrell CJ. Cerebellopontine angle tumors. In: Kumar M, Levine J, Schuster J, Kofke A, editors. Neurocritical care management of the neurosurgical patient. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 199–207. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yamada S, Aiba T, Hara M. Cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma: case report and literature review. Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7:91–94. doi: 10.3109/02688699308995062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Akay KM, Erdogan E, Izci Y, Kaya A, Timurkaynak E. Medulloblastoma of the cerebellopontine angle. Neurol Med Chir. 2003;43:555–558. doi: 10.2176/nmc.43.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jaiswal AK, Mahapatra AK, Sharma MC. Cerebellopointine angle medulloblastoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11:42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xia H, Zhong D, Wu X, Li J, Yang Y, Sun X. Medulloblastomas in cerebellopontine angle: epidemiology, clinical manifestations, imaging features, molecular analysis and surgical outcome. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;67:93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu T, Qu PR, Zhang S, et al. The clinical treatment and outcome of cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma: a retrospective study of 15 cases. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66585-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adeeb N, Mortazavi MM, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28:827–837. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1744-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Becker RL, Becker AD, Sobel DF. Adult medulloblastoma: review of 13 cases with emphasis on MRI. Neuroradiol. 1995;37:104–108. doi: 10.1007/s002340050055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meshkini A, Vahedi A, Meshkini M, Alikhah H, Naghavi-Behzad M. Atypical medulloblastoma: a case series. Asian J Neurosurg. 2014;9:45. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.131077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Doan NB, Patel M, Nguyen HS, et al. A rare extra-axial midline tentorial adult medulloblastoma with dural-tail sign mimicking a meningioma. Asian J Neurosurg. 2018;13:475. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.228563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Presutto E, Chappell M, Fullmer J, Ezhapilli S. Posterior fossa medulloblastoma in an atypical extra-axial location: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2018;13:365–370. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chung EJ, Jeun SS. Extra-axial medulloblastoma in the cerebellar hemisphere. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;55:362. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.6.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dallery F, Bouzerar R, Michel D, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric brain tumors. Neuroradiol. 2017;59:1143–1153. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1917-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Faleiro RM, de Souza Moraes VV, de Seixas Alves MT, et al. Extra-axial cerebello-pontine angle medulloblastoma. Arq Bras Neurocir. 2016;35:234–238. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goudihalli SR, Pathak A, Brar R, Mundi I. Reappraisal of cerebellopontine angle medulloblastomas: report of a fatal case and lessons learned. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2018;12:20–23. doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2017.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zoltán L. Die tumoren im foramen occipitale magnum. Acta Neurochir. 1974;30:217–225. doi: 10.1007/bf01405581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Müller HL, Fruhwald MC, Scheubeck M, et al. A possible role for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the diagnosis and follow-up of children with medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol. 1998;38:27–40. doi: 10.1023/a:1005961302340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sharma P, Mukherjee A, Bal C, Malhotra A, Kumar R. Somatostatin receptor-based PET/CT of intracranial tumors: a potential area of application for 68Ga-DOTA peptides? Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:1340–1347. doi: 10.2214/ajr.13.10987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guyotat J, Champier J, Pierre GS, et al. Differential expression of somatostatin receptors in medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2001;51:93–103. doi: 10.1023/a:1010624702443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen W, Cloughesy T, Kamdar N, et al. (2005) Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:945–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Muzi M, Spence AM, O'Sullivan F, et al. Kinetic analysis of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine in patients with gliomas. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1612–1621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Horky LL, Treves ST. PET and SPECT in brain tumors and epilepsy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011;22:169–184. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dhermain FG, Hau P, Lanfermann H, Jacobs AH, van den Bent MJ. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of tratment response in patients with gliomas. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:906–920. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70181-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Remke M, Hering E, Gerber NU, et al. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst 2) is a potential prognostic marker and a therapeutic target in medulloblastoma. Child Nerv Syst. 2013;29:1253–1262. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yeom KW, Mitchell LA, Lober RM, et al. Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:395–401. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a3670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:985–991. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353031338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Reddy N, Ellison DW, Soares BP, Carson KA, Huisman TA, Patay Z. Pediatric posterior fossa medulloblastoma: the role of diffusion imaging in identifying molecular groups. J Neuroimaging. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jon.12704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Al-Sharydah AM, Al-Arfaj HK, Al-Muhaish HS, et al. Can apparent diffusion coefficient values help distinguish between different types of pediatric brain tumors? Eur J Radiol Open. 2019;6:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Esa MM, Mashaly EM, El-Sawaf YF, Dawoud MM. Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient ratio in distinguishing common pediatric CNS posterior fossa tumors. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51:76. doi: 10.1186/s43055-020-00194-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dasgupta A, Gupta T, Pungavkar S, et al. Nomograms based on pre-operative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of molecular subgrouping in medulloblastoma: results from a radiogenomics study of 111 patients. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21:115–124. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Domínguez-Pinilla N, de Aragón AM, Tapias SD, et al. Evaluating the apparent diffusion coefficient in MRI studies as a means of determining paediatric brain tumour stages. Neurología (English Edition) 2016;31:45–465. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pant I, Chaturvedi S, Gautam VK, Pandey P, Kumari R. Extra-axial medulloblastoma in the cerebellopontine angle: report of a rare entity with review of literature. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2016;11:331. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.199477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Koob M, Girard N, Ghattas B, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI to determine pediatric brain tumor grades and types. J Neurooncol. 2016;127:345–353. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gaudino S, Benenati M, Martucci M, et al. Investigating dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in posterior fossa tumors: differences and similarities with supratentorial tumors. La Radiol Med. 2020;8:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gil-Salu JL, Rodriguez-Pena F, Lopez-Escobar M, Palomo MJ. Medulloblastoma presenting as an extra-axial tumor in the cerebellopontine angle. Neurocirugia. 2004;15:285–289. doi: 10.1016/s1130-1473(04)70485-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singh M, Cugati G, Symss NP, Pande A, Vasudevan MC, Ramamurthi R. Extra axial adult cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma: an extremely rare site of tumor with metastasis. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:25. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.77178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bahrami E, Bakhti S, Fereshtehnejad SM, Parvaresh M, Khani MR. Extra-axial medulloblastoma in cerebello-pontine angle: a report of a rare case with literature review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014;28:57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mehta JS, Sharr MM. An unusual cause of acute labyrinthine failure. J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112:193–195. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100140290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ahn MS, Jackler RK. Exophytic brain tumors mimicking primary lesions of the cerebellopontine angle. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:466–471. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199704000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Naimur-Rahman JA, Al-Rayess M, Jamjoom ZA. Cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2000;14:262–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Izycka-Swieszewska E, Debiec-Rychter M, Kloc W. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor in the cerebellopontine angle with isochromosome 17q presenting as meningioma in a woman 26 years of age. Clin Neuropathol. 2003;22:66–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Park SY, Kim JH, Kim KT, et al. A case of medullomyoblastoma of cerebellopontine angle mimicking acoustic neuroma. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45:719–722. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.4.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Santagata S, Kesari S, Black PM, Chan JA. Anaplastic variant of medulloblastoma mimicking a vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol. 2007;81:49–51. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nyanaveelan M, Azmi A, Saffari M, Banu SK, Suryati MY, Jeyaledchumy M. Cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma. Med J Malays. 2007;62:173–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yoshimura J, Nishiyama K, Fukuda M, Watanabe M, Igarashi H, Fujii Y. Adult cerebellopontine angle medulloblastoma originating in the pons mimicking focal brainstem tumor. J Neuroimaging. 2009;19:385–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cugati G, Singh M, Symss N, Pande A, Chakravarthy V, Ramamurthi R. Extra-axial cerebello pontine angle medulloblastoma: a rare site of tumor. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2011;32:123–124. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.89801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kumar R, Bhowmick U, Kalra SK, Mahapatra AK. Pediatric cerebellopontine angle medulloblastomas. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2008;3:127–130. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.43638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable. This is a review of publicly available information.
Not applicable.







