Dello Stritto et al. provide evidence that DNA lesions in both germline mitotic and meiotic compartments are less capable of triggering apoptosis in the absence of topoisomerase 3. In topoisomerase 3 mutants, uncontrolled bloom helicase activity governs repair of defective recombination intermediates to evade apoptosis.
Abstract
An important quality control mechanism eliminates meiocytes that have experienced recombination failure during meiosis. The culling of defective oocytes in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis resembles late oocyte elimination in female mammals. Here we show that topoisomerase 3 depletion generates DNA lesions in both germline mitotic and meiotic compartments that are less capable of triggering p53 (cep-1)–dependent apoptosis, despite the activation of DNA damage and apoptosis signaling. Elimination of nonhomologous, alternative end joining and single strand annealing repair factors (CKU-70, CKU-80, POLQ-1, and XPF-1) can alleviate the apoptosis block. Remarkably, the ability of single mutants in the other members of the Bloom helicase-topoisomerase-RMI1 complex to elicit apoptosis is not compromised, and depletion of Bloom helicase in topoisomerase 3 mutants restores an effective apoptotic response. Therefore, uncontrolled Bloom helicase activity seems to direct DNA repair toward normally not used repair pathways, and this counteracts efficient apoptosis. This implicates an as-yet undescribed requirement for topoisomerase 3 in mounting an effective apoptotic response to ensure germ cell quality control.
Introduction
Quality control through oocyte elimination is a widely conserved mechanism that plays a pivotal role in preventing the formation of faulty gametes (Hunter, 2017). The DNA damage response and induction of apoptotic cell death are temporally and spatially regulated in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Germline meiocytes residing at different stages of the cell cycle respond differently to exogenous genotoxic insults or the presence of aberrant recombination intermediates. Only cells in late pachynema can undergo apoptosis because CEP-1 (the p53 orthologue) is translationally repressed until that stage (Schumacher et al., 2005). Thus, apoptosis seems to be triggered in well-defined spatial and temporal windows during gamete maturation. A cep-1–dependent checkpoint induces apoptosis in the presence of persistent DNA damage (Gartner et al., 2008). CEP-1 activates the transcription of EGL-1 (Schumacher et al., 2001), which in turn promotes the release of CED-4 (the worm orthologue of Apaf1), culminating in the activation of CED-3, the major caspase necessary for apoptosis (Conradt and Horvitz, 1998).
The morphological changes that occur in dying cells have been characterized at unprecedented resolution in worms (Huelgas Morales and Greenstein, 2018). For example, the export of mitochondria along microtubule cables into the gonad cytoplasmic core coincides with alteration of the P granule content around the nuclear membranes (Raiders et al., 2018). Nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation of the SIR-2.1 deacetylase is an early apoptotic event (Greiss et al., 2008). Even in the absence of persistent DNA damage, about half of the nuclei in pachynema undergo cell death under normal physiological conditions (Gumienny et al., 1999) to provide a supply of nutrients and organelles for the developing oocytes (Andux and Ellis, 2008; Raiders et al., 2018). Apoptosis in response to meiotic failure is comparable to late oocyte attrition that occurs in mammals (Gartner et al., 2008).
Two major biological cell division processes contribute to the generation of healthy gametes: (1) the mitotic proliferation of premeiotic cells, which then (2) undergo meiosis to reduce the genome content and shuffle the parental genomes. During meiosis, two rounds of cell division follow a single DNA replication step. Pairs of homologous chromosomes separate during meiosis I. In meiosis II, each chromosome splits into its two sister chromatids. During prophase I, several processes lead to the formation of a physical linkage between homologues, which aids faithful chromosome segregation: these include regulated double-strand break (DSB) induction, homologue juxtaposition, stabilization of aligned homologues by the synaptonemal complex, DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR) to produce crossovers (COs), and the installation of cohesion (Gerton and Hawley, 2005; Zickler and Kleckner, 1999). These processes can be easily followed in the C. elegans hermaphrodite syncytial gonad over a spatiotemporal course, in which cells from the mitotic compartment enter meiosis and progress through the stages of leptonema/zygonema to pachynema and diplonema to form cellularized oocytes in diakinesis.
The major error-free pathway, HR, is the predominant DSB repair pathway used during meiosis. Following the induction of DSBs, DNA resection generates single-stranded overhangs at the DNA break that are stabilized by replication protein A (RPA). The subsequent replacement of RPA by the RAD-51 recombinase generates RAD-51–covered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fibers, which invade one chromatid of the parental homologue (forming D-loop structures) and use it as a repair template during HR-mediated repair. After DNA synthesis, a DNA double Holliday junction (dHJ) molecule is generated. The dJH is resolved as either CO or non-CO depending on the directionality of DNA cleavage by the resolvases (nucleases that cleave dHJs), and both of these are outcomes of recombination (Hunter, 2015). The STR/BTR complex, composed of the Sgs1/Bloom helicase, topoisomerase 3, and scaffolding proteins (RMI1 and, in some organisms, RMI2), greatly aids the recombination process at multiple steps. Topoisomerase 3 has two enzyme activities that operate preferentially on hemicatenane DNA structures: cleavage of one DNA strand and passage of the other DNA strand (Haber, 2015). Prominent activities in meiosis are the displacement of invaded D-loops (which prevents multi-chromatid joint molecules) and decatenation of joint DNA molecules (which would otherwise impede chromosome segregation; Kaur et al., 2015; Kaur et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2015). The STR/BTR complex can dismantle dHJ substrates in vitro, reflecting its essential activity of reinforcing non-CO outcomes during mitotic recombination (Bizard and Hickson, 2014). In addition, the complex has an unrelated and poorly understood role in supporting COs while they are being formed (Jagut et al., 2016; Schvarzstein et al., 2014). Topoisomerase 3 also has a role in the repair of replication lesions (Cejka et al., 2010) and the final separation/resolution of replicated circular mitochondrial genomes (Nicholls et al., 2018).
When HR is compromised, error-prone DNA repair pathways, which are usually suppressed in the germline (such as nonhomologous end joining [NHEJ], alternative NHEJ [Alt-NHEJ], or single-strand annealing [SSA]) can be employed as salvage pathways to repair DSBs (e.g., see Macaisne et al., 2018; Martin et al., 2005). In NHEJ, the broken ends are first captured by the heterodimer CKU-70/80 and then ligated by DNA ligase IV (LIG-4; Chapman et al., 2012). Despite preferential use of the HR pathway, CKU-70/80 has been shown to load onto meiotic breaks, with active replacement of the dimer enabling resection (Girard et al., 2018; Lemmens et al., 2013). If resection is limited, short ssDNA close to the DNA break can generate a substrate for polymerase theta (POLQ-1) to engage in the Alt-NHEJ pathway (Boulton and Jackson, 1996; Schimmel et al., 2017). DNA lesions with long resected ssDNA tracks can employ SSA, which involves the endonuclease XPF-1 (e.g., Lans et al., 2013; Macaisne et al., 2018).
The UFD-2 ubiquitin ligase coordinates the decision between persistent DNA damage signaling and apoptosis by promoting the dissociation of RAD-51 from DNA repair sites to expose RPA-1–covered ssDNA lesions; persistently high RAD-51 levels lead to suppression of apoptosis (Ackermann et al., 2016).
C. elegans topoisomerase 3 (top-3) mutants display replication defects and meiotic accumulation of undefined DNA masses that cannot segregate to produce viable eggs (this study and Kim et al., 2002; Wicky et al., 2004). Here we show that top-3 germline nuclei accumulate an impressive amount of RAD-51 and RPA-1. Surprisingly, despite the initial up-regulation of DNA damage signaling, followed by EGL-1 activation and the induction of apoptosis-associated events, the apoptotic levels in top-3 mutants did not exceed the levels seen in WT gonads. Further analysis reveals that the efficient execution of DNA damage–induced apoptosis can be bypassed by either premeiotic depletion of RAD-51 or by depletion of HIM-6, CKU-70/CKU-80, POLQ-1, or XPF-1 in top-3. We propose that in top-3 mutants, uncontrolled activity of the helicase HIM-6 produces aberrant recombination intermediates that activate the NHEJ/Alt-NHEJ/SSA pathways. We speculate that once those aberrant recombination intermediates engage in one of these alternative DNA repair pathways, the DNA damage signaling is not sufficiently sustained to reinforce the efficient culling of unhealthy oocytes. Thus, this study has identified an important role for topoisomerase 3 in germ cell quality control.
Results
C. elegans DNA topoisomerase 3 mutants accumulate DNA lesions
Phenotypic differences in meiosis were observed between mutants of the various STR/BTR complex members, resulting in different diakinesis chromosome configurations (Agostinho et al., 2013; Jagut et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2000; Schvarzstein et al., 2014; Wicky et al., 2004). To investigate the role of C. elegans top-3 in meiosis, we generated the gene disruption allele top-3 (jf101) (Fig. 1 A).
The top-3 mutants displayed 100% embryonic lethality and a prominent reduction in brood size. Adult worms laid an average of only 27.3 ± 8.1 (mean ± SD) embryos compared with the average brood size of 237.6 ± 4 for the WT (Fig. 1 B). Similar to top-3 RNAi worms (Kim et al., 2000), the number of nuclei per gonad was reduced to 141.4 ± 12.5 (compared with 322.8 ± 23.7 in the WT; Fig. 1 C and Fig. S1 A), and the mitotic gonad compartment was prolonged (Fig. S1 A).
To examine the completion of meiotic prophase I events, we inspected and quantified the number of bivalents at diakinesis. At this stage, six DAPI-stained bodies (corresponding to homologous chromosome linked by chiasmata) are visible in the WT. In contrast, equivalent cells in the top-3 mutant contain an average of 5.5 morphologically aberrant DAPI-stained bodies (Fig. 1 D). We next performed FISH of diakinesis chromosomes using markers for two different chromosomes and found that the abnormalities present at this stage were caused by the aggregation of nonallelic DNA filaments (Fig. S1 B). This finding is consistent with the presence of aberrant connections between chromosomes. The top-3 diakinesis phenotype depends on meiotic DSBs generated by the SPO-11 topoisomerase. The top-3; spo-11 mutant displayed 11.4 ± 0.6 (mean ± SD) DAPI-stained bodies, corresponding to 12 achiasmatic chromosomes (spo-11: 11.5 ± 0.5 DAPI-stained bodies; Fig. 1 D). This result suggests that the joint DNA molecules accumulate only after the induction of meiotic DSBs.
The phenotype of the top-3 null mutant differs from the phenotypes of null mutants of the other complex members (rmh-1 [worm RMI1]; him-6 [worm bloom helicase]) in that embryonic death is more severely affected in top-3 (viability: rmh-1, 26.5 ± 7.6%; him-6, 43 ± 1.7%; Agostinho et al., 2013; Jagut et al., 2016; Schvarzstein et al., 2014; Wicky et al., 2004). Furthermore, the formation of joint aberrant DNA structures at diakinesis could still be observed (although the number of DAPI bodies varied), even when the major or alternative repair pathways known to be employed in the worm gonad were impaired, as follows: HR, by knocking down the sumo/ubiquitin ligase zhp-3 and the endonuclease mus-81; NHEJ, by knocking down the DNA-binding protein cku-80; Alt-NHEJ, by knocking down the polymerase polq-1; sister chromatid exchange, by knocking down the ubiquitin ligase brc-1; and synthesis-dependent strand annealing, by knocking down the endonuclease xpf-1 (Fig. S1, C and D; Macaisne et al., 2018). Persistent catenane structures are obvious in the top-3; zhp-3 double mutants, where 12 univalents would be expected (Fig. S1 D).
To determine whether the top-3 phenotype is caused by problems during early DSB repair events, we assessed the kinetics of RPA-1 and RAD-51 foci dynamics during prophase I (Alpi et al., 2003; Colaiácovo et al., 2003; Stergiou et al., 2011). We detected the accumulation of the ssDNA-coating protein RPA-1 and/or the recombinase RAD-51, indicating that ssDNA tails were not being correctly processed at an early stage of recombination. In top-3, bright and distinct RPA-1 foci were localized throughout the gonad, a feature that is never seen in the WT when using this particular RPA-1 transgene with the given level of resolution (Fig. 1 E). Likewise, RAD-51 foci accumulation started in the mitotic zone and continued throughout the gonad, where numerous foci persisted even up to diplonema (also see Wicky et al., 2004). Moreover, RAD-51 foci were much more abundant and coalesced into stretches, which is never observed in the WT (Fig. 1, F and G). We found that the formation of RAD-51–coated DNA recombination intermediates was not dependent on meiotic DSBs, in contrast to the diakinesis chromosome phenotype (Fig. 1 G and Fig. S2 A). RAD-51 foci were not detected in the spo-11 mutant; however, RAD-51 accumulation in spo-11; top-3 was similar to the top-3 single mutant (Fig. 1 G and Fig. S2 A), suggesting that most of the accumulated RAD-51 foci derived from the premeiotic stage. However, these lesions found in top-3 cannot serve as substrates for meiotic CO formation.
The C. elegans RAD-51 paralog, RFS-1, has been shown to promote HR at DNA lesions during replication. RFS-1 recruits RAD-51 to replication forks that have stalled by the action of DNA cross-linking agents and other replication blocking lesions, but is dispensable for the repair of meiotic DSBs (Ward et al., 2007). Depletion of RFS-1 in the top-3 mutant prevented RAD-51 accumulation in the premeiotic region (Fig. 1 G and Fig. S2 A). Nevertheless, RAD-51 accumulated in meiocytes in the rfs-1 top-3 spo-11RNAi mutant (Fig. S2 A), indicating that the premeiotic aberrant recombination intermediates are carried into meiocytes.
Taken together with the finding that DNA lesions are observed in the top-3; spo-11 double mutant, this result confirms that the absence of TOP-3 leads to abundant premeiotic unprocessed intermediates.
top-3 mutants activate DNA damage signaling but not efficient germline apoptosis
Exposure of C. elegans germlines to DNA damaging ionizing irradiation (IR; causing DSBs) triggers the activation of cell cycle checkpoints. In the gonad, DSBs induce cell cycle arrest in the proliferative mitotic zone and an increased number of nuclei entering apoptosis in late pachynema (Gartner et al., 2008; Gartner et al., 2000).
Cell cycle arrest in the mitotic gonad tip is caused by the inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK-1), through phosphorylation by the CHK-1 (and, to a lesser extent, CHK-2) kinase. CDK-1 phosphorylation is downstream of ATR/ATM kinase (C. elegans ATL-1/ATM-1) activation by DNA damage (Fig. 2 A; Garcia-Muse and Boulton, 2005; Kalogeropoulos et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2010; O’Connell et al., 2000). In the top-3 mutant, G2-arrested nuclei were seen in the gonad mitotic tip. These were positive for phospho–CDK-1 (Fig. 2 B), a feature only seen in the WT after irradiation. This result shows that DNA damage signaling is activated in the top-3 mutant.
Physiological apoptosis eliminates around 50% of germ cells; however, persistent DNA damage increases apoptosis levels by directing nuclei toward apoptosis in late pachynema (Gartner et al., 2008). We quantified the number of apoptotic nuclei per gonad in live animals in two different ways: (1) using a CED-1::GFP transgene, which marks the engulfing cells that surround the apoptotic nucleus (Craig et al., 2012); and (2) incubation with SYTO-12, a dye that readily cross-reacts with nucleic acids in nuclei undergoing apoptosis. In contrast to its activation of cell cycle arrest in top-3, a high basal level of DNA damage did not increase apoptosis above the physiological level (or, in the case of CED-1::GFP quantification, only slightly increased the number of apoptotic cells; Fig. 2, C and D). As a comparison, persistent DNA damage increased the level of apoptosis by approximately threefold in the SCF ubiquitin ligase F box protein mutant prom-1 (Jantsch et al., 2007; Fig. S2 B). Normalization of the number of apoptotic nuclei to the total amount of nuclei present in the last 10 cell rows of the gonad (the region competent for apoptosis execution) indicated that apoptosis is only partially induced by endogenous and exogenous DNA damage in top-3 compared with irradiated WT worms or with prom-1 mutants (Fig. S2 C).
To better understand whether the low levels of apoptosis in top-3 are a consequence of reduced numbers of germline nuclei, we quantified the apoptotic cells in the Notch signaling mutant glp-1(bn18) (Fox and Schedl, 2015). Abrogation of the GLP-1 signal eliminates the pool of proliferative germ cells, resulting in a gonad with fewer nuclei (71.7 ± 8.8 [mean ± SD]) compared with the WT (333.7 ± 7.8; Fig. S2 E). In glp-1, endogenous lesions and DNA damage induced by irradiation both triggered the same apoptotic responses seen in WT worms (Fig. S2 D). We conclude that a low number of germ cells does not necessarily mean a decreased apoptotic response.
Challenging with different IR doses did not increase the number of apoptotic nuclei in top-3 mutants, but had a strong impact in control animals (Fig. 2, C and D). Whereas apoptosis levels increased above physiological levels in the WT after low-dose IR (30 Gy), higher doses did not change apoptosis levels in top-3, highlighting a defect in apoptosis. This contrasts with the apoptotic responses observed in mutants of other members of the STR/BTR complex (rmh-1, rmh-2, and him-6), which are competent to up-regulate apoptosis after irradiation (Fig. 2 E). This finding suggests that top-3 has a specific defect in triggering efficient DNA damage–induced apoptosis.
We conclude that the presence of abundant DNA damage in top-3 mutants cannot effectively trigger apoptosis. Moreover, in contrast to null mutants of other members of the STR/BTR complex, even high doses of irradiation cannot augment apoptosis in the top-3 mutant.
The apoptosis machinery is active in top-3 mutants
As top-3 mutants are competent to activate cell cycle arrest during S-phase in the proliferative zone but cannot effectively trigger germline apoptosis in response to DNA damage, we wanted to examine how and to what extent apoptosis could be initiated.
DNA damage–induced apoptosis depends on CEP-1 (the p53 orthologue) and its transcriptional targets, such as EGL-1 (Conradt and Horvitz, 1998; Derry et al., 2001; Hofmann et al., 2002; Schumacher et al., 2001). After CEP-1–mediated transactivation of egl-1, CED-4 becomes capable of activating the CED-3 caspase (Gartner et al., 2008; see the scheme in Fig. 3 A). CEP-1 is expressed in the proliferative region, transcriptionally repressed upon meiotic entry and turned on again in the “death zone” (late pachynema/diplonema; Hofmann et al., 2002; Schumacher et al., 2005). Immunostaining revealed that CEP-1 localization is similar in the top-3 mutant and the WT (Fig. 3 B). Next, we examined whether the expressed CEP-1 was competent to activate egl-1 transcription (Craig et al., 2012). For this, we analyzed egl-1 expression by real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in WT worms before and after IR treatment and in undamaged top-3 worms. We observed that egl-1 transcription in top-3 was constitutively up-regulated to levels comparable to those of irradiated WT worms (120 Gy; Fig. 3 C). These results suggest that CEP-1–mediated signaling is efficient in top-3.
In parallel, but independently of cep-1, the SIR-2.1 deacetylase is removed from nuclei that undergo apoptosis (Greiss et al., 2008). SIR-2.1 immunostaining confirmed the presence of SIR-2.1–free nuclei in the top-3 germline (Fig. 3 D). Another event in cells undergoing apoptosis is the removal of PGL-1 from P granules (Raiders et al., 2018). PGL-1 immunostaining confirmed that PGL-1 is efficiently removed in top-3 gonads (Fig. 3 E). The quantification of PGL-1–free nuclei and normalization to the total number of nuclei in the death zone revealed that PGL-1 removal in top-3 gonads takes place at levels comparable to those of WT worms exposed to genotoxic stress (Fig. 3 E). Therefore, we conclude that the apoptotic machinery is activated in top-3.
The apoptosis block in top-3 is due to aberrant mitotic and meiotic recombination intermediates
In a mutant with persistent recombination intermediates, apoptosis execution was previously suggested to depend on RAD-51 removal from the recombination intermediates by a process involving the Ubiquitin Fusion Degradation 2 (UFD-2) ubiquitin ligase (Ackermann et al., 2016). To determine whether the presence of RAD-51–free ssDNA in top-3 mutants could trigger DNA damage–induced apoptosis, we quantified the apoptotic nuclei in top-3; rad-51RNAi. We observed that the apoptosis levels in top-3; rad-51RNAi did not differ from those of rad-51RNAi, indicating that the apoptotic defects of top-3 could be overcome in this genetic background (Fig. 4 A). In top-3, RAD-51 foci were loaded onto stalled replication forks in a rfs-1–dependent manner in the mitotic zone (Fig. 1 G and Fig. S2 A; rfs-1 encodes a RAD-51 paralog). To examine if the specific removal of RAD-51 in the mitotic zone would alleviate the apoptosis block, we quantified apoptosis in the double mutant top-3 rfs-1. Indeed, RAD-51 removal from mitotic recombination intermediates increased the apoptosis levels (Fig. 4 B). Moreover, we confirmed with spo-11RNAi that these “apoptosis-inducing” recombination intermediates occurred independently of meiotic DSBs (Fig. 4 C). Collectively, we conclude that the apoptosis block in top-3 can be relieved by the removal of RAD-51 from the mitotic repair intermediates.
To better understand the specific stage when the RAD-51–free ssDNA would be susceptible to apoptosis induction, we generated a conditional rad-51 mutant by insertion of an auxin-inducible degron fused to the RAD-51 protein (Fig. S3 A for functionality of the rad-51::degron and efficiency of degradation). Meiocytes in the gonad represent a spatiotemporal gradient of meiotic prophase I, with nuclei moving down the gonad tube with a speed of approximately one cell row/hour (Jaramillo-Lambert et al., 2007). 5-ethynyl-2ʹ-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation showed that the flux of nuclei through the gonad in top-3 did not differ from WT, despite an extended mitotic region in top-3 (Fig. S3 B).
We then induced RAD-51 degradation to establish a time course of depletion in WT and top-3 germlines. Since it takes ∼40 h for nuclei to move from the mitosis/meiosis transition zone to the death zone (the gonad region competent for apoptosis), we examined apoptosis at 20, 30, and 40 h after inducing RAD-51 degradation, which correspond to mid-pachynema, early pachynema, and mitosis/meiosis transition, respectively (Fig. 4, D and E). In the WT, RAD-51 degradation in mid-pachynema already led to apoptosis induction (Fig. 4 E, left). Strikingly, in top-3, apoptosis was elevated only at 40 h after auxin treatment (Fig. 4 E, right), indicating that the lesions that become competent to apoptosis induction reside at the mitosis/meiosis transition. Although removal of RAD-51 from resected ssDNA normally leads to apoptosis up-regulation in the WT (Fig. 4 A and Fig. 4 E, left; Alpi et al., 2003), we did not observe this after 20–30 h of auxin exposure in top-3 (Fig. 4 E, right); under these conditions, RAD-51 should have been removed from the spo-11–induced DSBs.
Altogether, this suggests that the RAD-51–bound recombination intermediates originating in the premeiotic zone can augment apoptosis upon RAD-51 removal. However, this does not hold true for meiotic breaks because RAD-51 depletion from meiotic recombination intermediates in top-3 did not trigger enhanced apoptosis. Therefore, meiotic breaks are probably processed aberrantly at a step before RAD-51 loading.
To determine whether (1) the DSBs in meiotic prophase are unable to induce efficient apoptosis due to the “chromatin pathologies” established in the premeiotic stage or (2) the lack of TOP-3 in meiosis directly affects them, we generated an internally tagged top-3::ha::degron line to specifically deplete TOP-3 in meiosis to examine apoptosis under meiotic deletion of TOP-3 (Fig. S3 C for functionality of the top-3::ha::degron and efficiency of degradation; TIR1 is driven by the sun-1 promoter, which drives expression in all cells in the germline; Zhang et al., 2015). We confirmed depletion of TOP-3 by analyzing protein abundance in the gonad. TOP-3 localizes as distinct foci throughout pachynema (Fig. 5 A) with similar dynamics as has been seen for RMH-1 and HIM-6 foci (Jagut et al., 2016). TOP-3–depleted pachytene cells had a significantly less efficient apoptotic response after irradiation compared with top-3::ha::degron worms without auxin treatment (Fig. 5 B). Therefore, we conclude that lack of TOP-3 generates DNA lesions in both premeiotic and meiotic germline compartments that are less capable of inducing a massive apoptotic response.
Depletion of NHEJ, Alt-NHEJ, or SSA increases apoptosis in top-3 mutants
Since in top-3 mutants the apoptosis block is alleviated only when RAD-51 is removed from the mitotic DNA intermediates, we wanted to examine if alternative repair pathways, which come into play before RAD-51 loading and when HR is compromised, could alleviate the apoptosis block in meiosis. In C. elegans, CKU-80 has been observed to bind early recombination intermediates when processing to RAD-51–loaded filaments is compromised (Lemmens et al., 2013). Therefore, we generated a functional GFP-tagged CKU-80 line (Fig. S4 A) and analyzed its CKU-80 expression/loading dynamics.
Strikingly, we detected CKU-80 accumulation in the mitotic gonad compartment and early/mid-pachynema in top-3 (Fig. 5 C); in contrast, CKU-80 was present at lower levels in the WT. For comparison, we measured CKU-80 accumulation in the resection mutant, com-1 (Fig. 5 C). CKU-80 levels were comparable in early/mid-pachynema in top-3 and com-1 but not in the mitotic compartment, indicating that top-3 may encounter problems at the early stages of meiotic DNA repair, similar to com-1.
We therefore generated cku-80 top-3 double mutants and found a remarkable increase in apoptosis (Fig. 6 A), together with egl-1 transcription levels comparable to the top-3 single mutant (Fig. S2 F). The double mutant did not display increased numbers of germline nuclei (Fig. S2 G), and EdU incorporation experiments did not suggest accelerated meiotic progression (Fig. S3 B). This result rules out the possibility that either changes in nuclei progression through the gonad or differing numbers of nuclei in the gonad account for the apoptosis increase in the double mutant. Similarly, we detected a significant increase in the apoptosis levels in cku-80 top-3::ha::degron upon IR after meiotic depletion of top-3 (Fig. S4, B and C). To find out whether activation of the NHEJ pathway dampens the apoptotic response in top-3, we also analyzed apoptosis in the double mutants top-3 cku-70, and top-3 lig-4 (Fig. 6 A). Apoptosis induction was similar in top-3 cku-70 and top-3 cku-80, but slightly lower in top-3 lig-4. Interestingly, the top-3–dependent apoptosis block was overcome in the top-3 polq-1 double mutant (defective in Alt-NHEJ; Fig. 6 A). Also, top-3 polq-1 did not display increased numbers of germline nuclei (Fig. S2 G). Concurrent impairment of NHEJ and Alt-NHEJ in top-3 did not display an additive effect (Fig. 6 A). These results suggest that both NHEJ and Alt-NHEJ affect the efficiency of apoptosis execution in top-3.
Since repair via SSA resembles Alt-NHEJ, we tested whether abrogation of SSA would similarly increase the apoptosis levels. We therefore depleted the endonuclease XPF-1 acting in SSA in the top-3 mutant. Indeed, we found a similar increase in the apoptotic levels in the xpf-1; top-3 double mutant (Fig. 6 A). XPF-1 not only is employed in the SSA pathway but also functions as a resolvase in C. elegans (Agostinho et al., 2013; Saito et al., 2009). We therefore examined whether deficiency in another resolution enzyme, like the endonuclease MUS-81, would increase apoptosis in top-3 mutants. Strikingly, mus-81; top-3 displayed apoptotic levels comparable to top-3 single mutants (Fig. S4 D), implying that interfering with resolution does not enhance the apoptotic levels per se. Thus, it is likely that the intermediates that interfere with the apoptosis signaling are generated at an early stage during the DSBs repair.
We suggest that in top-3 mutants, aberrant recombination intermediates activate the NHEJ, Alt-NHEJ, and SSA pathways and that this affects the apoptotic response. The lack of fragmentation of diakinesis chromosomes in top-3 polq-1 cku-70 (Fig. S1 C) does not allow us to reach a definite conclusion about to what extent DNA repair occurs via those pathways. The presence of complex joint DNA structures in top-3 precludes this analysis (also see Fig. S1, B–D; and Discussion).
As CKU-80 can accumulate at both premeiotic and meiotic DNA breaks, we investigated how much meiotic DNA lesions contribute to apoptosis induction by CKU-80 depletion. Strikingly, germline apoptosis levels did not differ between top-3 cku-80; spo-11RNAi and the top-3 single mutant (Fig. 6 B). This result suggests that in the top-3 mutant, meiotic DNA breaks might be largely repaired by noncanonical alternative pathway(s), contributing to the low apoptotic response. Furthermore, our evidence shows that in top-3, apoptosis triggered by CKU-80 removal is cep-1–dependent (Fig. 6 C).
Depletion of Bloom helicase HIM-6 increases apoptosis in top-3 mutants
To gain further insight into the nature of the aberrant recombination intermediates that are largely refractory to HR, we generated a him-6; top-3::ha::degron strain and analyzed apoptosis after meiotic depletion of TOP-3. It has been previously shown that the double mutant him-6; top-3 induces a mitotic catastrophe (Wicky et al., 2004), which precludes the analysis of the effect of HIM-6 on recombination intermediates generated in the mitotic gonad zone. Remarkably, meiotic depletion of both TOP-3 and HIM-6 showed an apoptotic response equally high as the one we observed in the him-6 single mutant (Fig. 5 B, Fig. S4 C, and Fig. 2 E). This strongly suggests that in the absence of the topoisomerase, the Bloom helicase (HIM-6) creates aberrant recombination intermediates that are less capable to use HR for their repair in meiocytes.
Discussion
The activities of the STR/BTR complex in meiosis have been meticulously worked out in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (for a review, see Haber, 2015). The defects relate to failure to reject invaded D-loops and to dissolve/decatenate joint DNA structures. An as yet poorly understood CO activity has also been reported, in particular in C. elegans (Jagut et al., 2016; Schvarzstein et al., 2014; Wicky et al., 2004). The STR/BTR complex is not reported to make a major contribution to the resection steps in meiosis (for review, see Haber, 2015). Based on our findings, we showed a previously undescribed consequence of mutating topoisomerase 3 in the germline. Elimination of topoisomerase 3 function creates aberrant recombination intermediates in the premeiotic and meiotic compartments of the gonad. However, these do not lead to efficient cep-1/p53-dependent germline apoptosis (model shown in Fig. 6 D). The top-3 mutant probably accumulates replicative lesions, onto which RAD-51 is continuously loaded throughout meiosis. The RAD-51 paralog, RFS-1, acts on these lesions by promoting RAD-51 recruitment (Ward et al., 2007), and rfs-1 depletion renders these lesions competent to trigger apoptosis. This is consistent with our observation that RAD-51 depletion in premeiotic nuclei also increases apoptosis in top-3 mutants. Exclusive meiotic depletion of RAD-51 and TOP-3 showed that recombination intermediates in meiocytes are also less effective in triggering apoptosis, probably via an intermediate upstream of RAD-51 loading.
Consistent with CKU-80 up-regulation in top-3 mutants, aberrant recombination intermediates caused by the absence of TOP-3 might direct meiotic breaks away from repair via HR toward normally not employed repair pathways. With this, recombination intermediates are no longer detected as unrepaired DNA lesions, and the nuclei evade culling by apoptosis. To test whether TOP-3 has a more direct role in apoptosis itself, we have also performed an experiment with top-3::ha::degron degrading TOP-3 at a later stage during recombination (data not shown). We could observe that late degradation of TOP-3 several hours after irradiation had no effect on the apoptotic response, which was as high as in the auxin untreated control. This also supports a model where the recombination intermediate per se causes the unexpected low apoptosis in top-3.
The fact that apoptosis levels in top-3 mutants can be increased by mutating the classical NEHJ, Alt-NHEJ, or SSA pathways strongly suggests that defective recombination intermediates direct DNA repair toward these pathways, preventing a critical level of a key apoptosis factor(s) from being reached. egl-1 transcription is up-regulated in top-3 to comparable levels to those observed in irradiated WT. Our analysis of the landmark events of DNA damage–induced apoptosis suggests that apoptosis is initiated but not fully executed in the top-3 mutant, and that physiological apoptosis levels are not affected.
The processing of the aberrant lesions by these alternative pathways does not affect chromosome configurations at diakinesis, since top-3 polq-1 cku-70 mutants do not display increased chromosome fragmentation as a consequence of unrepaired meiotic breaks. However, the disorganized, uncondensed, and highly abnormal diakinesis DAPI bodies in top-3 persist in the absence of several repair pathways (e.g., in the top-3; zhp-3 double mutant, where we would expect a lot of univalents; Fig. S1 D); therefore, we assume that the decatenation of certain joint structures might actually rely on TOP-3 activity. Pre-meiotic DNA lesions occurring in top-3 mutants progressively accumulate RAD-51 signals (even in the absence of SPO-11–induced DNA breaks), possibly creating a “pathological chromatin” that reinforces the joint structures.
An alternative explanation for the reduced apoptosis levels in top-3 mutants is that CKU-80 persists at the ends of the DNA break sites (as in com-1 mutants; Lemmens et al., 2013), thereby inhibiting resection. However, the facts that apoptosis is also boosted in the top-3 polq-1 double mutant or RPA-1–coated ssDNA accumulates in the top-3 mutant argue against this possibility.
Remarkably, rmh-1, rmh-2, and him-6 single mutants mount an effective apoptotic response after irradiation. Dna2-mediated DNA resection in mitosis is supported jointly by the helicase and the topoisomerase (Bizard and Hickson, 2014). The him-6 helicase mutant is proficient in the apoptotic response to irradiation and displays CKU-80 expression similar to the GFP::CKU-80 (Fig. S4 A). Thus, this might argue against a model in which the absence of HIM-6 alone would generate faulty resected intermediates that prefer non-HR DNA repair pathways. In meiocytes, we observed that the elimination of the helicase alleviates the apoptosis block in top-3 mutants. This might indicate that aberrant activities of the helicase render recombination intermediates more prone to use alternative repair pathways, when TOP-3 is not available.
We do not know the exact nature of the aberrant recombination intermediates, but in meiosis, they seem to occur upstream of rad-51 (Fig. 4 E) and could still have to do with controlled resection. Our genetic analysis proposes that the unscheduled meiotic activities of HIM-6 affecting those recombination intermediates are normally counteracted by TOP-3.
In summary, aberrant recombination intermediates in top-3 mutant C. elegans meiocytes remarkably have a severe impact on healthy oocyte production by undermining the efficient elimination of faulty oocytes by apoptosis.
Materials and methods
Experimental model and strain details
Worm strains were maintained at 20°C (Brenner, 1974) and, unless otherwise indicated, on nematode growth medium (NGM) agar plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50. Hermaphrodites were used in all experiments. The N2 Bristol strain was used as the WT control. See Table S1 for a complete list of strains, reagents, and resources.
Cytology
Immunofluorescence analysis of worms at 20–24 h after L4 stage was performed as previously described (Martinez-Perez and Villeneuve, 2005). Gonads were dissected in 1× PBS on poly-l-lysine–coated slides, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS for 5 min at room temperature, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. After freeze-cracking, slides were incubated in methanol at −20°C for 1 min, before washing three times in PBS containing 1% Tween-20 (1× PBST) for 5 min at room temperature. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation in 1% BSA in 1× PBST for at least 30 min. Primary antibodies diluted in 1× PBST were applied and incubated overnight at 4°C. Slides were then washed three times in 1× PBST at room temperature, and secondary antibodies were applied for 2 h. After three washes in PBST, 2 µg/ml DAPI was applied for 1 min, and slides were then washed for at least 20 min in 1× PBST. Slides were mounted with Vectashield.
[RPA-1::YFP] was analyzed in dissected gonads after fixation in 2.5% paraformaldehyde for 1 min and freezing in liquid nitrogen. After the freeze crack, the slides were incubated in 95% ethanol for 1 min as previously described (Checchi et al., 2014).
For GFP::CKU-80 detection, worms were dissected in egg buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20 and directly frozen in liquid nitrogen. After freeze-cracking, slides were incubated in methanol at −20°C for 1 min. Gonads were fixed with 4% PFA in 100 mM K2HPO4, washed three times in 1× PBST, and incubated with DAPI. For visualization of CED-1::GFP (Fig. 2 C), worms were fixed in pure ethanol before applying DAPI and Vectashield.
The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-RAD-51 (1:1,000 dilution; a gift from M. Zetka, McGill University, Montreal, Canada), rabbit anti-pCDK-1 (1:150 dilution; Calbiochem; cat. #219440), sheep anti-CEP-1 (1:100 dilution; a gift from A. Gartner, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology: Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea), goat anti-SIR2.1 (1:100 dilution; a gift from A. Gartner; Greiss et al., 2008), mouse anti-PGL-1 (1 µg/µl; a gift from T. Hyman, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany), rabbit anti-HA (preabsorbed to WT worms, 1:100 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich; cat. #H6908), rhodamine-conjugated sheep anti-digoxigenin (1:100 dilution; Roche; cat. #11207750910), and FITC-conjugated goat anti-biotin (1:250 dilution; Abcam; cat. #ab6650). Appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 594 were used at a dilution of 1:500.
Gonads were dissected from worms at 20–24 h after L4 stage to quantify DAPI bodies at diakinesis and the total number of germlines nuclei. For the antibodies used, image acquisition and quantification of signal, see below.
Quantification and kinetics of RAD51 foci
RAD-51 quantification (Fig. S2 A) was performed by dividing the gonad into seven equal zones from the distal tip to late pachynema, and counting the number of foci/nucleus for each zone. Graphs were used to display the percentage of nuclei in the following categories: 0 foci, 1 focus, 2 or 3 foci, 4–6 foci, 7–12 foci, >12 foci, and stretches (a continuous signal not resolved into foci). Three gonads were assessed per genotype.
Quantification of CKU-80 signals
GFP::CKU-80 signals were quantified by measuring the integrated intensity fluorescence signal in encircled nuclei normalized to the measured area (after subtraction of the WT background signal; Fig. 5 C) with Fiji ImageJ software. Germline images were acquired using the same settings, deconvolved, and projected before the analysis. 10 nuclei from each zone were randomly chosen for quantification. Six gonads were quantified per genotype.
Quantification of TOP-3 foci
TOP-3 quantification was performed by dividing the gonad into four equal zones from the transition zone to late pachynema and counting the number of foci/nucleus for each zone. Three gonads were assessed per genotype.
Image acquisition
Images were acquired at room temperature using a Delta Vision system equipped with 60×/1.42 and 100×/1.40 oil immersion objective lenses and a cooled charge-coupled device camera, an Ultra Delta Vision microscope equipped with UPlanXApo 60x/1.42 Oil and UPlanSApo 100x/1.4 Oil objective and a 4-megapixel sCMOS camera. Z stacks of 0.20 µm were deconvolved using SoftWoRx software and processed in Adobe Photoshop. Three to five images were acquired using the same settings to cover each gonad. Maximum intensity projections of deconvolved images were generated using Fiji/ImageJ after background subtraction using a rolling-ball radius of 50 pixels. Where specified, images of gonads consist of multiple stitched images; this was necessary due to the size limitation of the field of view at high magnifications. Stitching of images to build up entire gonads was performed manually in Adobe Photoshop. Levels of stitched images were adjusted relative to each other in Adobe Photoshop to correct for auto-adjustment settings of the microscope, as previously described (Link et al., 2018).
Apoptosis quantification
To quantify apoptotic nuclei after irradiation, worms (20 h after L4 stage) were irradiated using a 137Cs source and scored after 20 h (7 h for glp-1 mutants). Worms were soaked in 33 µM SYTO-12 in M9 buffer for 2 h and then transferred to seeded NGM plates for at least 20 min before being mounted onto a 2% agarose pad for quantification. For CED-1::GFP assessment, worms at 20–24 h after L4 stage were mounted onto 2% agarose pads, and apoptotic nuclei were quantified by scoring the GFP signal in the engulfing cells. The number of positive nuclei per gonad was scored using a Zeiss Axio microscope equipped with a 40× or 63× oil immersion objective lens.
RNAi
RNAi was administered using the feeding or soaking methods (Kamath and Ahringer, 2003).
rad-51 and cku-80 RNAi was performed using Ahringer library clones. spo-11 RNAi was performed by soaking worms with dsRNA (nucleotides 593–1,500 in cosmid T05E11). Bacteria (HT115) expressing rad-51, cku-80 dsRNA, or pL4440 empty vector (control) were streaked onto plates containing 100 mg/ml ampicillin and 12.5 mg/ml tetracycline and incubated overnight at 37°C. Single colonies were then incubated overnight at 37°C in liquid Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 mg/ml ampicillin. Liquid cultures were centrifuged (2,000 g, 20 min at 4°C), and bacterial pellets were resuspended in 1.5–2 ml medium (as described above) supplemented with 1 mM IPTG + ampicillin, plated into NGM plates, and incubated at 37°C overnight to induce dsRNA expression. L4-stage worms were then transferred to RNAi plates. The efficiency of rad-51 RNAi was verified by RAD-51 immunostaining and of cku-80 RNAi by rescue of the diakinesis phenotype of the com-1 mutant (Lemmens et al., 2013).
spo-11 RNAi was performed by soaking worms with dsRNA (corresponding to nucleotides 593–1,500 of the T05E11 cosmid). Templates were generated by PCR using the following primer pairs containing the T3 promoter (indicated by lower case letters): (1) forward: 5′-aattaaccctcactaaaggGTCGGGCTAATTTAAACATT-3′, reverse: 5′-TGAATCTTCGTGGTACTCGT-3′; and (2) forward: 5′-aattaaccctcactaaaggTGAATCTTCGTGGTACTCGT-3′; reverse: 5′-GTCGGGCTAATTTAAACATT-3′.
Purified DNA (0.1–0.2 µg) was used for in vitro transcription using a MEGAscript T3 Transcription Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (TriFast Peqlab; VWR) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. To anneal the dsRNA, equal amounts (3,000 ng/µl) of the two ssRNAs were incubated in 3× soaking buffer (32.7 mM Na2HPO4, 16.5 mM KH2PO4, 6.3 mM NaCl, and 14.1 mM NH4Cl) at 68°C for 10 min and then at 37°C for 30 min. L4-stage worms were then soaked in dsRNA at a concentration of 1 µg/µl for 24 h and transferred onto NGM plates; apoptotic nuclei were scored 48 h later. Efficient spo-11 RNAi was indicated by the presence of 12 univalents in diakinesis nuclei as indicated in Fig. S4 E.
FISH
FISH was performed as previously described (Silva et al., 2014). Gonads of young adult worms were dissected and fixed in 7.4% paraformaldehyde. After washing three times in 2× SCCT (1x saline-sodium citrate buffer [SSC] with 0.1% Tween-20) buffer, gonads were dehydrated by incubation in increasing ethanol concentrations and air-dried at room temperature. Chromosome III containing the pairing center (cosmid T17A3) and the chromosome V 5S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus labeled with biotin and digoxigenin, respectively, were used as FISH probes according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the Nick Translation Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Denaturation and annealing were performed on a heat block for 3 min at 93°C, 2 min at 72°C, and overnight at 37°C. Afterward, slides were washed once at 37°C with a 1:1 ratio of 2× SCCT: 50% formamide, once in 2× SCCT containing 10% Tween-20 and then three times in 2× SCCT. Slides were then blocked in 1% BSA, and fluorescently labeled anti-biotin and anti-digoxigenin antibodies were applied for 1 h at room temperature. After DAPI staining, the slides were mounted in Vectashield.
RT-qPCR
RNA was isolated from 50 adult hermaphrodites (20 h after L4 stage or 20 h after irradiation with 120 Gy) per genotype using TRIzol (TriFast Peqlab; VWR), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized using the Invitrogen SuperScript III First-strand synthesis system with random hexamers according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using the Bioline SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Kit master mix with 20 ng cDNA in a final volume of 20 µl and three-step cycling.
The primer pair for egl-1 was forward: 5′-CACCTTTGCCTCAACCTCTT-3′, reverse: 5′-GCTGATCTCAGAGTCATCAAAA-3′; and for htp-1 (the reference gene for normalization) was forward: 5′-AACCATCTACGACGAATCGCT-3′, reverse: 5′-CATGCATTTCAGCTTTTCAGTGATG-3′.
For all genotypes, three biological replicates corresponding to three independent RNA extractions and RT-qPCR reactions were performed.
Gene editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
top-3 mutant
Two homology regions (the left and right homology regions) from the top-3 locus, each comprising ∼500 bp (the right homology region is located in exon 1 and the left homology region in exon 5), were amplified from genomic DNA, fused to the unc-119 gene locus (from the pCFJ150 vector), and cloned using the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The construct was sequence-verified and injected into unc-119 (ed9) worms. The three guides used for the injections were inserted into the pU6::klp-12 single-guide RNA (sgRNA) vector (Addgene; 46170), as previously described (Friedland et al., 2013).
sgRNAs used for top-3 knockout were as follows: sgRNA1, 5′-GAGAAGAATGACGTGGCAAAGG-3′; sgRNA2, 5′-GTCGCTGCGATTTTATCAAATGG-3′; and sgRNA3, 5′-AATGAAAAGAGCCTTATTTGTGG-3′. This resulted in gene disruption after amino acid 33. A preexisting mutation in the protospacer adjacent motif sequence resulted in a change toof amino acid 7. In addition, the unc-119 insertion led to the deletion of 171 amino acids (from amino acid 34 to 205, corresponding to the first four exons).
gfp::cku-80, rad-51::degron and top-3::ha::degron
gfp::cku-80, rad-51::degron and top-3::ha::degron were generated using a published protocol (Paix et al., 2015). To generate the rad-51::degron strain, the repair template was composed of two ssDNA molecules (163 bp and 128 bp) with a 35-bp overlap between them and a 35-bp overlap with homology to the rad-51 sequence. Into this sequence, we inserted a linker (5′-GGTGGCAGTGGAGGTGGCAGTGGA-3′) and the degron sequence (5′-ATGCCTAAAGATCCAGCCAAACCTCCGGCCAAGGCACAAGTTGTGGGATGGCCACCGGTGAGATCATACCGGAAGAACGTGATGGTTTCCTGCCAAAAATCAAGCGGTGGCCCGGAGGCGGCGGCGTTCGTGAAG-3′) directly before the stop codon.
The same strategy was used to generate the top-3::ha::degron. The injection mix was done as previously described (Paix et al., 2015). CRISPR events were followed by PCR analysis of the progeny, with candidate strains verified by sequencing.
For the gfp::cku-80 repair template, a 30-bp homologous sequence from the N-terminus was fused to GFP to generate an N-terminally tagged CKU-80 protein with a linker sequence (5′-GGTGGCAGTGGA-3′) between the GFP and CKU-80 ORFs. The following CRISPR RNA (crRNA) was used: for gfp::cku-80, 5′-TACAGGAATGCCGCCTAAAAAGG-3′.
To generate the rad-51::degron strain, the following guide RNA was used: crRNA for the rad-51::degron, 5′-TGGTATTGAGGACGCACGCGAGG-3′.
To generate the top-3::ha::degron strain, the repair template was composed of two ssDNA molecules (135 bp and 170 bp) with a 35-bp overlap between them and a 35-bp overlap with homology to the top-3 sequence. The TIR-1 binding peptide was inserted in an internal position (between Gly 635 and Gly 636), together with an HA tag (5′-TACCCATACGATGTTCCAGATTACGCT-3′). Three linkers were inserted in the following order: linker (5′-AGTAGCGGAAGT-3′)–HA–linker (5′-GGTGGCAGTGGA-3′)–degron–linker (5′-AGTAGCGGAAGT-3′). The following crRNA was used for the top-3::ha::degron: 5′-CCTGGAGGTGGTGGTGGGGGAGG-3′.
CRISPR events were followed by PCR analysis of the progeny, and candidate strains were verified by sequencing.
Auxin treatment
A 440-mM auxin stock solution was prepared in pure ethanol and stored at 4°C. rad-51::degron worms were transferred to seeded NGM plates, with both the plates and bacterial (E. coli strainOP50) suspension containing 1 mM auxin. At the indicated time points, samples were taken for analysis. rad-51::degron display a complete depletion of RAD-51 already after 30 min of auxin exposure (Fig. S3 A).
top-3::ha::degron young adult worms were transferred to auxin plates for 10 h before irradiation (120 Gy); apoptosis was quantified 20 h later (control untreated/unirradiated worms were subjected to the same timings). top-3::ha::degron display a complete depletion of HA foci after 2 h of auxin exposure (Fig. S3 C).
For all auxin treatments, NGM plates suplemented with 0.25% ethanol was used as the control.
EdU treatment
At 20 h after L4 stage, worms were incubated in M9 buffer supplemented with 20 µM EdU for 15 min. Worms were then transferred to seeded plates, and the gonads were dissected at the indicated time points after EdU incorporation. Prior to DAPI staining, the Click-iT reaction was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis used the Mann–Whitney test in Prism 6 software (GraphPad) and Microsoft Excel. The number of events was recorded, and error bars (mean ± SD) and statistically significant differences were determined.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1, which is related to Fig. 1, shows that top-3 mutants display joint DNA structures at diakinesis that are independent of the major and alternative DNA repair pathways. Fig. S2, related to Figs. 1, 2, and 3, shows that top-3(jf101) DNA lesions do not trigger a proper apoptotic response. Fig. S3, which is related to Figs. 4 and 5, shows that in top-3, meiotic progression is not delayed. Fig. S4, related to Fig. 5, shows that the GFP::CKU-80 transgene is functional. Table S1 lists reagents and resources.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Angela Graf for technical support. We thank Antoine Baudrimont for drawing the model; Maria Velkova for experimental assistance; and Anton Gartner, Nicola Silva, Dimitra Paouneskou, and Maria Velkova for helpful suggestions. We are grateful to the Gartner, Zetka, Conradt (University College London, London, UK), and Hyman laboratories for reagents.
The V. Jantsch laboratory is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (P 31275-B28 and W1238). P. Barraud acknowledges financial support from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40OD010440).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author contributions: M.R. Dello Stritto and V. Jantsch conceived all experiments and wrote the paper. M.R. Dello Stritto conducted all experiments, except for a few strains that were constructed by B. Bauer. B Bauer did the CED-1::GFP quantification (± irradiation). P. Barraud designed the top-3::ha::degron line.
References
- Ackermann, L., Schell M., Pokrzywa W., Kevei É., Gartner A., Schumacher B., and Hoppe T.. 2016. E4 ligase-specific ubiquitination hubs coordinate DNA double-strand-break repair and apoptosis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23:995–1002. 10.1038/nsmb.3296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agostinho, A., Meier B., Sonneville R., Jagut M., Woglar A., Blow J., Jantsch V., and Gartner A.. 2013. Combinatorial regulation of meiotic holliday junction resolution in C. elegans by HIM-6 (BLM) helicase, SLX-4, and the SLX-1, MUS-81 and XPF-1 nucleases. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003591. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alpi, A., Pasierbek P., Gartner A., and Loidl J.. 2003. Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 112:6–16. 10.1007/s00412-003-0237-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andux, S., and Ellis R.E.. 2008. Apoptosis maintains oocyte quality in aging Caenorhabditis elegans females. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000295. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bizard, A.H., and Hickson I.D.. 2014. The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6:a016477. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulton, S.J., and Jackson S.P.. 1996. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 15:5093–5103. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00890.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner, S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77:71–94. 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cejka, P., Cannavo E., Polaczek P., Masuda-Sasa T., Pokharel S., Campbell J.L., and Kowalczykowski S.C.. 2010. DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature. 467:112–116. 10.1038/nature09355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman, J.R., Taylor M.R., and Boulton S.J.. 2012. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell. 47:497–510. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Checchi, P.M., Lawrence K.S., Van M.V., Larson B.J., and Engebrecht J.. 2014. Pseudosynapsis and decreased stringency of meiotic repair pathway choice on the hemizygous sex chromosome of Caenorhabditis elegans males. Genetics. 197:543–560. 10.1534/genetics.114.164152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colaiácovo, M.P., MacQueen A.J., Martinez-Perez E., McDonald K., Adamo A., La Volpe A., and Villeneuve A.M.. 2003. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev. Cell. 5:463–474. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00232-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conradt, B., and Horvitz H.R.. 1998. The C. elegans protein EGL-1 is required for programmed cell death and interacts with the Bcl-2-like protein CED-9. Cell. 93:519–529. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81182-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig, A.L., Moser S.C., Bailly A.P., and Gartner A.. 2012. Methods for studying the DNA damage response in the Caenorhabdatis elegans germ line. Methods Cell Biol. 107:321–352. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394620-1.00011-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Derry, W.B., Putzke A.P., and Rothman J.H.. 2001. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science. 294:591–595. 10.1126/science.1065486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox, P.M., and Schedl T.. 2015. Analysis of Germline Stem Cell Differentiation Following Loss of GLP-1 Notch Activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 201:167–184. 10.1534/genetics.115.178061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedland, A.E., Tzur Y.B., Esvelt K.M., Colaiácovo M.P., Church G.M., and Calarco J.A.. 2013. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Methods. 10:741–743. 10.1038/nmeth.2532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Muse, T., and Boulton S.J.. 2005. Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 24:4345–4355. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gartner, A., Milstein S., Ahmed S., Hodgkin J., and Hengartner M.O.. 2000. A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage--induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol. Cell. 5:435–443. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80438-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gartner, A., Boag P.R., and Blackwell T.K.. 2008. Germline survival and apoptosis. WormBook. 1–20. . 10.1895/wormbook.1.145.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerton, J.L., and Hawley R.S.. 2005. Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:477–487. 10.1038/nrg1614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Girard, C., Roelens B., Zawadzki K.A., and Villeneuve A.M.. 2018. Interdependent and separable functions of Caenorhabditis elegans MRN-C complex members couple formation and repair of meiotic DSBs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115:E4443–E4452. 10.1073/pnas.1719029115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greiss, S., Hall J., Ahmed S., and Gartner A.. 2008. C. elegans SIR-2.1 translocation is linked to a proapoptotic pathway parallel to cep-1/p53 during DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev. 22:2831–2842. 10.1101/gad.482608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gumienny, T.L., Lambie E., Hartwieg E., Horvitz H.R., and Hengartner M.O.. 1999. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development. 126:1011–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haber, J.E. 2015. TOPping Off Meiosis. Mol. Cell. 57:1142. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann, E.R., Milstein S., Boulton S.J., Ye M., Hofmann J.J., Stergiou L., Gartner A., Vidal M., and Hengartner M.O.. 2002. Caenorhabditis elegans HUS-1 is a DNA damage checkpoint protein required for genome stability and EGL-1-mediated apoptosis. Curr. Biol. 12:1908–1918. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01262-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huelgas Morales, G., and Greenstein D.. 2018. C. elegans germline cell death, live! PLoS Genet. 14:e1007425. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter, N. 2015. Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7:a016618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter, N. 2017. Oocyte Quality Control: Causes, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 82:235–247. 10.1101/sqb.2017.82.035394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jagut, M., Hamminger P., Woglar A., Millonigg S., Paulin L., Mikl M., Dello Stritto M.R., Tang L., Habacher C., Tam A., et al. 2016. Separable Roles for a Caenorhabditis elegans RMI1 Homolog in Promoting and Antagonizing Meiotic Crossovers Ensure Faithful Chromosome Inheritance. PLoS Biol. 14:e1002412. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jantsch, V., Tang L., Pasierbek P., Penkner A., Nayak S., Baudrimont A., Schedl T., Gartner A., and Loidl J.. 2007. Caenorhabditis elegans prom-1 is required for meiotic prophase progression and homologous chromosome pairing. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:4911–4920. 10.1091/mbc.e07-03-0243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaramillo-Lambert, A., Ellefson M., Villeneuve A.M., and Engebrecht J.. 2007. Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line. Dev. Biol. 308:206–221. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalogeropoulos, N., Christoforou C., Green A.J., Gill S., and Ashcroft N.R.. 2004. chk-1 is an essential gene and is required for an S-M checkpoint during early embryogenesis. Cell Cycle. 3:1196–1200. 10.4161/cc.3.9.1116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamath, R.S., and Ahringer J.. 2003. Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods. 30:313–321. 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00050-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur, H., De Muyt A., and Lichten M.. 2015. Top3-Rmi1 DNA single-strand decatenase is integral to the formation and resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell. 57:583–594. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur, H., Krishnaprasad G.N., and Lichten M.. 2019. Unresolved Recombination Intermediates Cause a RAD9-Dependent Cell Cycle Arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 213:805–818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.C., Lee J., and Koo H.S.. 2000. Functional characterization of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA topoisomerase IIIalpha. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:2012–2017. 10.1093/nar/28.9.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.C., Lee M.H., Ryu S.S., Kim J.H., and Koo H.S.. 2002. Coaction of DNA topoisomerase IIIalpha and a RecQ homologue during the germ-line mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Cells. 7:19–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lans, H., Lindvall J.M., Thijssen K., Karambelas A.E., Cupac D., Fensgård O., Jansen G., Hoeijmakers J.H., Nilsen H., and Vermeulen W.. 2013. DNA damage leads to progressive replicative decline but extends the life span of long-lived mutant animals. Cell Death Differ. 20:1709–1718. 10.1038/cdd.2013.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.J., Gartner A., Hyun M., Ahn B., and Koo H.S.. 2010. The Caenorhabditis elegans Werner syndrome protein functions upstream of ATR and ATM in response to DNA replication inhibition and double-strand DNA breaks. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000801. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemmens, B.B., Johnson N.M., and Tijsterman M.. 2013. COM-1 promotes homologous recombination during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis by antagonizing Ku-mediated non-homologous end joining. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003276. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Link, J., Paouneskou D., Velkova M., Daryabeigi A., Laos T., Labella S., Barroso C., Pacheco Piñol S., Montoya A., Kramer H., et al. 2018. Transient and Partial Nuclear Lamina Disruption Promotes Chromosome Movement in Early Meiotic Prophase. Dev. Cell. 45:212–225.e7. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macaisne, N., Kessler Z., and Yanowitz J.L.. 2018. Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization. Genetics. 210:843–856. 10.1534/genetics.118.301402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin, J.S., Winkelmann N., Petalcorin M.I., McIlwraith M.J., and Boulton S.J.. 2005. RAD-51-dependent and -independent roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-related protein during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3127–3139. 10.1128/MCB.25.8.3127-3139.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Perez, E., and Villeneuve A.M.. 2005. HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. Genes Dev. 19:2727–2743. 10.1101/gad.1338505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicholls, T.J., Nadalutti C.A., Motori E., Sommerville E.W., Gorman G.S., Basu S., Hoberg E., Turnbull D.M., Chinnery P.F., Larsson N.G., et al. 2018. Topoisomerase 3α Is Required for Decatenation and Segregation of Human mtDNA. Mol. Cell. 69:9–23.e6. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Connell, M.J., Walworth N.C., and Carr A.M.. 2000. The G2-phase DNA-damage checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 10:296–303. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01773-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paix, A., Folkmann A., Rasoloson D., and Seydoux G.. 2015. High Efficiency, Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes. Genetics. 201:47–54. 10.1534/genetics.115.179382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raiders, S.A., Eastwood M.D., Bacher M., and Priess J.R.. 2018. Binucleate germ cells in Caenorhabditis elegans are removed by physiological apoptosis. PLoS Genet. 14:e1007417. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saito, T.T., Youds J.L., Boulton S.J., and Colaiácovo M.P.. 2009. Caenorhabditis elegans HIM-18/SLX-4 interacts with SLX-1 and XPF-1 and maintains genomic integrity in the germline by processing recombination intermediates. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000735. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schimmel, J., Kool H., van Schendel R., and Tijsterman M.. 2017. Mutational signatures of non-homologous and polymerase theta-mediated end-joining in embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 36:3634–3649. 10.15252/embj.201796948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher, B., Hofmann K., Boulton S., and Gartner A.. 2001. The C. elegans homolog of the p53 tumor suppressor is required for DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Curr. Biol. 11:1722–1727. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00534-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schumacher, B., Hanazawa M., Lee M.H., Nayak S., Volkmann K., Hofmann E.R., Hengartner M., Schedl T., and Gartner A.. 2005. Translational repression of C. elegans p53 by GLD-1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell. 120:357–368. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schvarzstein, M., Pattabiraman D., Libuda D.E., Ramadugu A., Tam A., Martinez-Perez E., Roelens B., Zawadzki K.A., Yokoo R., Rosu S., et al. 2014. DNA helicase HIM-6/BLM both promotes MutSγ-dependent crossovers and antagonizes MutSγ-independent interhomolog associations during caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics. 198:193–207. 10.1534/genetics.114.161513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva, N., Ferrandiz N., Barroso C., Tognetti S., Lightfoot J., Telecan O., Encheva V., Faull P., Hanni S., Furger A., et al. 2014. The fidelity of synaptonemal complex assembly is regulated by a signaling mechanism that controls early meiotic progression. Dev. Cell. 31:503–511. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stergiou, L., Eberhard R., Doukoumetzidis K., and Hengartner M.O.. 2011. NER and HR pathways act sequentially to promote UV-C-induced germ cell apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ. 18:897–906. 10.1038/cdd.2010.158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang, S., Wu M.K.Y., Zhang R., and Hunter N.. 2015. Pervasive and essential roles of the Top3-Rmi1 decatenase orchestrate recombination and facilitate chromosome segregation in meiosis. Mol. Cell. 57:607–621. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward, J.D., Barber L.J., Petalcorin M.I., Yanowitz J., and Boulton S.J.. 2007. Replication blocking lesions present a unique substrate for homologous recombination. EMBO J. 26:3384–3396. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicky, C., Alpi A., Passannante M., Rose A., Gartner A., and Müller F.. 2004. Multiple genetic pathways involving the Caenorhabditis elegans Bloom’s syndrome genes him-6, rad-51, and top-3 are needed to maintain genome stability in the germ line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5016–5027. 10.1128/MCB.24.11.5016-5027.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L., Ward J.D., Cheng Z., and Dernburg A.F.. 2015. The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Development. 142:4374–4384. 10.1242/dev.129635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zickler, D., and Kleckner N.. 1999. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:603–754. 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.