Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health crisis that affects many aspects of human lives. In the absence of vaccines and antivirals, several behavioral change and policy initiatives such as physical distancing have been implemented to control the spread of COVID-19. Social media data can reveal public perceptions toward how governments and health agencies worldwide are handling the pandemic, and the impact of the disease on people regardless of their geographic locations in line with various factors that hinder or facilitate the efforts to control the spread of the pandemic globally.
Objective
This paper aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people worldwide using social media data.
Methods
We applied natural language processing (NLP) and thematic analysis to understand public opinions, experiences, and issues with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic using social media data. First, we collected over 47 million COVID-19–related comments from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and three online discussion forums. Second, we performed data preprocessing, which involved applying NLP techniques to clean and prepare the data for automated key phrase extraction. Third, we applied the NLP approach to extract meaningful key phrases from over 1 million randomly selected comments and computed sentiment score for each key phrase and assigned sentiment polarity (ie, positive, negative, or neutral) based on the score using a lexicon-based technique. Fourth, we grouped related negative and positive key phrases into categories or broad themes.
Results
A total of 34 negative themes emerged, out of which 15 were health-related issues, psychosocial issues, and social issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic from the public perspective. Some of the health-related issues were increased mortality, health concerns, struggling health systems, and fitness issues; while some of the psychosocial issues were frustrations due to life disruptions, panic shopping, and expression of fear. Social issues were harassment, domestic violence, and wrong societal attitude. In addition, 20 positive themes emerged from our results. Some of the positive themes were public awareness, encouragement, gratitude, cleaner environment, online learning, charity, spiritual support, and innovative research.
Conclusions
We uncovered various negative and positive themes representing public perceptions toward the COVID-19 pandemic and recommended interventions that can help address the health, psychosocial, and social issues based on the positive themes and other research evidence. These interventions will help governments, health professionals and agencies, institutions, and individuals in their efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 and minimize its impact, and in reacting to any future pandemics.
Keywords: social media, COVID-19, coronavirus, infodemiology, infoveillance, natural language processing, text mining, thematic analysis, interventions, health issues, psychosocial issues, social issues
Introduction
Background
Infectious diseases have occurred in the past and continue to emerge. Infectious diseases are termed “emerging” if they newly appear in a population or have existed but are increasing rapidly in incidence or geographic range [1]. Examples of emerging infectious diseases include acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Ebola, dengue hemorrhagic fever, Lassa fever, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 flu, Zika, etc [2]. Evidence shows that emerging infectious diseases are among the leading causes of death and disability globally [3]. For instance, a 1-year estimate of the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic shows that 43-89 million people were infected [4], and 201,200 respiratory deaths and 83,300 cardiovascular deaths were linked to the disease [5] worldwide. In addition, 770,000 HIV deaths were recorded in 2018 alone, with approximately 37.9 million people already infected with the virus globally [6]. Ebola is another deadly infectious disease that has an average case-fatality rate of about 50%, with a range of 25%-90% case-fatality rates in past outbreaks [2,7].
In December 2019, COVID-19, caused by the novel coronavirus, emerged and soon became the latest deadly infectious disease [8,9] worldwide, with more than 9.4 million confirmed cases and over 482,800 deaths in 188 countries and regions as of June 25, 2020 [10]. Hence, it was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the global health systems and caused socioeconomic challenges due to job losses and lockdowns (and other restrictive measures) imposed by governments and public health agencies to curtail the spread of the virus. Evidence has already shown that emerging infectious diseases impose significant burden on global economies and public health [3,11-13]. To understand public concern, personal experiences, and factors that hinder or facilitate the efforts to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, social media data can produce rich and useful insights that were previously impossible in both scale and extent [14].
Over the years, social media has witnessed a surge in active users to more than 3.8 billion worldwide [15], making it a rich source of data for research in diverse domains. In the health domain, social media data (ie, user comments or posts on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, online forums, blogs, etc) have been used to investigate mental health issues [16,17], maternal health issues [18,19], diseases [20-24], substance use [25,26], and other health-related issues [27,28]. Other domains (eg, politics, commerce, marketing, or banking) have also witnessed widespread use of social media data to uncover new insights related to election results [29-32], election campaigns [33], customer behavior and engagement [34,35], etc. Regarding the COVID-19 crisis, social media data can reveal public perceptions toward how governments and health agencies worldwide are handling the pandemic and the social, economic, psychological, and health impacts of the disease on people regardless of their geographic locations in line with various factors that hinder or facilitate the efforts to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic globally.
In this paper, we apply natural language processing (NLP) to understand public opinions, experiences, and issues with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic using data from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and three online discussion forums (ie, Archinect [36,37], LiveScience [38], and PushSquare [39]). NLP is a well-established method that has been applied in many JMIR papers and other health informatics papers to understand various health-related issues. For example, Abdalla et al [40] studied the privacy implications of word embeddings trained on clinical data containing personal health information, while Bekhuis et al [41] applied NLP to extract clinical phrases and keywords from a corpus of messages posted to an internet mailing list. Specifically, we aim to answer the following research questions (RQs):
RQ1: What are the negative issues (health, psychosocial, and social issues) shared by people on social media with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic?
RQ2: What are the positive opinions or perceptions of people with respect to COVID-19 and how it is being handled?
RQ3: How can the negative issues be addressed using insights from the positive opinions and other research evidence?
The methodological approach used in answering our RQs are as follows:
We apply an NLP approach for extracting opinionated key phrases from COVID-19–related social media comments.
We uncover various negative and positive themes, representing public perceptions toward the COVID-19 pandemic after categorizing the key phrases. Our results revealed 34 negative themes, out of which 15 were health-related issues, psychosocial issues, and social issues related to the pandemic from the public perspective. In addition, 20 positive themes emerged from our results.
We recommend interventions that can help address the health, psychosocial, and social issues based on the positive themes and other research evidence. These interventions will help governments, health professionals and agencies, institutions, and individuals in their efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 and minimize its impact, as well as in reacting to any future pandemics.
Relevant Literature
Social media has been a rich source of data for research in many domains, including health [42]. Research that uses social media in conjunction with NLP within the health domain continues to grow and cover broad application areas such as health surveillance (eg, mental health, substance use, diseases, and pharmacovigilance), health communication, sentiment analysis, and so on [43]. For example, Park and Conway [44] used the lexicon-based approach to track prevalence of keywords indicating public interest in four health issues— Ebola, e-cigarettes, marijuana, and influenza—based on social media data. Afterward, they generated topics that explain changes in discussion volume over time using the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) algorithm. Similarly, Jelodar et al [45] applied LDA to extract latent topics in COVID-19–related comments and used the long short-term memory recurrent neural network technique for sentiment classification. Furthermore, Nobles et al [46] used social media data to examine the needs (including seeking health information) of the reportable sexually transmitted diseases community. Their NLP approach involves extracting the top 50 unigrams from the posts based on frequency and then generating topics using the nonnegative matrix factorization technique instead of LDA. Paul et al [47] applied the Ailment Topic Aspect Model to generate latent topics from Twitter data with the aim of detecting mentions of specific ailments including allergies, obesity, and insomnia. They used a list of key phrases to automatically identify possible systems and treatments. McNeill et al [48] investigated how the dissemination of H1N1-related advice in the United Kingdom encourages or discourages vaccine and antiviral uptake using Twitter data. They conducted an automated content analysis using the KH Coder tool (Koichi Higuchi) to explore potential topics based on frequency of occurrence and then performed a more detailed or conversational analysis to understand skepticism over economic beneficiaries of vaccination and the risks and benefits of medication based on public opinion. On the other hand, Oyebode et al [49] performed sentiment analysis on user reviews of mental health apps using the machine learning approach. They compared five classifiers (based on five different machine learning algorithms) and used the best performing classifier to predict the sentiment polarity of reviews. However, none of the aforementioned approaches considers the context in which words appear in unstructured texts, which instinctively plays a substantial role in conveying meaning.
To investigate the significance of contextual text analysis, Dave and Varma [50] compared the noncontextual n-gram chunking approach and the contextual part-of-speech (POS) chunking approach in their experimental research in the field of advertising. Although the n-gram chunking method simply extracts words of varying lengths within a sentence boundary as candidate key phrases, the POS chunking method infers the context of words using POS patterns such as one or more noun tags (NN, NNP, NNS, and NNPS) along with adjective tags (JJ) and optional cardinal tags (CD) and determiners (DT). They focused on key phrases up to a length of 6 for their experiments. Their initial assessment showed that the majority of the key phrases generated using the n-gram chunking method are not meaningful within the advertising context, hence not useful. Furthermore, they observed the impact of key phrases from both methods on the performance of classification systems based on naive Bayes, logistic regression, and bagging machine learning algorithms. Their findings revealed that systems using the POS chunking method outperformed those using the n-gram chunking method for feature extraction. We leveraged Dave and Varma’s [50] contextual method in this study and extended it to capture additional POS patterns, NLP preprocessing techniques, and sentiment scoring using a lexicon-based technique.
Finally, to uncover insights about the type of information shared on Twitter during the peak of the H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic in 2009, Ahmed et al [51] generated 8 broad themes using a coding method involving expert reviewers. Similarly, Bekhuis et al [41] involved two dentists to manually and iteratively classify clinical phrases into categories and subcategories. We also used this method in the key phrase categorization stage of our study to group related key phrases into categories or broad themes.
Methods
Overview
The main goal of this paper is to understand and reflect on people’s personal experiences and opinions with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic using social media data. To achieve this, we applied various standard and well-known computational techniques that are highlighted in the following section and summarized in Figure 1.
We collected COVID-19–related comments or posts from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and three online discussion forums using programming languages (Python and C#) and relevant application programming interfaces (APIs).
We performed preprocessing tasks that involve applying NLP techniques to clean the data and prepare them for the key phrase extraction phase.
We applied the NLP approach to extract meaningful key phrases, which are words or phrases that convey the topical content of the comments. This approach is in seven stages: grammar definition, sentence breaking and tokenization, POS tagging, lemmatization, syntactic parsing, transformation and filtering, and sentiment scoring.
Based on the sentiment scores associated with the candidate key phrases, we automatically assigned sentiment polarity to the key phrases and then grouped negative and positive key phrases into categories or broad themes using the thematic analysis method. This helps to answer our RQs.
Data Collection
We used various automated techniques to collect 47,410,795 COVID-19-related or coronavirus-related comments from six social media platforms: Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Archinect, LiveScience, and PushSquare. The following describes the techniques and the breakdown of the data collected from each platform:
Twitter: We developed a tool using C# programming language to automatically extract tweets containing relevant hashtags in real time through the Twitter Streaming API [52]. To determine trending Twitter hashtags, we searched for “Trending Twitter hashtags on COVID-19” using the Google search engine and retrieved various popular hashtags from several websites including RiteTag [53] and Insider [54]. In addition, we checked a sample of top tweets on Twitter to see other common COVID-19–related hashtags they contained. The selected hashtags were #CoronaVirus, #COVID-19, #Covid_19, #COVID19, #COVID, #QuarantineAndChill, #CoronaCrisis, #MyPandemicSurvivalPlan, #caronavirusoutbreak, #CoronavirusOutbreak, #Quarantined, #pandemic, #coronapocalypse, #QuarantineLife, #StopTheSpread, #CoronaVirusUpdates, #StayAtHome, #selfquarantine, #COVIDー19, #panicbuying, #ncov2019, #Coronavid19, #SocialDistancing, #cronovirus, #CoronaVirusUpdate, and #CoronavirusPandemic. A total of 47,249,973 tweets were collected between March 20 and April 3, 2020.
YouTube: We developed a Python script to retrieve comments associated with relevant videos through the YouTube Data API [55] using search keywords such as covid19, covid-19, and coronavirus. Due to YouTube’s quota limits, we were only able to extract 111,722 comments across 2939 videos posted between January 1 and April 3, 2020.
Facebook: Due to Facebook’s automated search restrictions, we applied a semiautomated approach to extract comments. First, we manually retrieved relevant groups (n=91) and pages (n=68), using the following search keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus, and COVID. Afterward, we developed a Python script to extract 777 and 8382 comments posted on the groups and pages, respectively, between January 1 and April 3, 2020.
Online discussion forums: We developed a Python script to extract 20,747; 793; and 18,401 comments (from coronavirus-related threads) posted on Archinect, LiveScience, and PushSquare, respectively, between January 1 and April 3, 2020.
Data Preprocessing
Next, we applied the following NLP techniques to clean and prepare data for analysis using Python:
Remove hashtags, mentions, and URLs
Expand contractions (eg, wouldn’t is replaced with would not)
Unescape HTML characters (eg, “&” is replaced with the “&” equivalent)
Remove HTML tags (eg, <p>, <span>, and <br />)
Remove special characters, except those with semantic implications such as periods and exclamation marks (which are useful for identifying sentence boundaries) or commas
Reduce repeated characters (eg, toooooool becomes tool)
Convert slangs to their equivalent English words using online slang dictionaries [56,57], which contain 5434 entries in total
Remove numeric words
After the preprocessing tasks were completed, non-English and duplicated comments were removed, thereby reducing the total number of comments to 8,021,341.
Key Phrase Extraction
Next, we randomly selected 1,051,616 comments (representing approximately 13% of the entire data set) and then extracted meaningful key phrases that conveyed the topical content of the comments. We refer to the data set containing the comments as corpus and each comment as document in the remaining parts of this paper. We focused on key phrases that are opinionated (ie, express or imply positive or negative sentiment [58]) since our goal was to determine public opinions and impact with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic. We extracted candidate key phrases from our corpus using a seven-stage NLP approach, shown in Figure 2. We implemented our approach using the Python programming language.
To derive meaningful key phrases, we defined the following regular grammar: <DT>? <JJ.*>* <NN.*>* <VB.*>? (<IN>? <DT>? <JJ.*>* <NN.*>*)? which specifies a meaningful POS pattern that the syntactic parser uses to deconstruct each sentence in the documents into their constituents [59]. Table 1 shows the various parts of speech (or syntactic categories) captured in the grammar. These syntactic categories are based on well-established POS tagging guidelines for English [60]. In the aforementioned regular grammar, the “?” and “*” characters represent “optional” and “zero or more occurrences,” respectively. Our regular grammar is aimed at generating key phrases that capture both context and sentiment of a conversation using nouns, adjectives, and verbs. Research has shown that nouns are most useful in knowing the context of a conversation (ie, what is being discussed) [61], while verbs and adjectives are important for sentiment detection [62]. Determiners and prepositions are also captured by the grammar since they usually co-occur with noun or adjective phrases (eg, a meal for six people or a hospital on the hilltop).
Table 1.
Tag | Description | Matching pattern |
DT | Determiner | <DT> |
JJ | Adjective | <JJ.*> |
JJR | Adjective (comparative) | <JJ.*> |
JJS | Adjective (superlative) | <JJ.*> |
NN | Noun (singular) | <NN.*> |
NNS | Noun (plural) | <NN.*> |
NNP | Proper noun (singular) | <NN.*> |
NNPS | Proper noun (plural) | <NN.*> |
VB | Verb (base form) | <VB.*> |
VBD | Verb (past tense) | <VB.*> |
VBG | Verb (gerund or present participle) | <VB.*> |
VBN | Verb (past participle) | <VB.*> |
VBP | Verb (non–third person singular present) | <VB.*> |
VBZ | Verb (third person singular present) | <VB.*> |
IN | Preposition or subordinating conjunction | <IN> |
Next, each document is split into sentences, and then each sentence is split into tokens or words. The sentence breaking task is achieved using an unsupervised algorithm that considers abbreviations, collocations, capitalizations, and punctuations to detect sentence boundaries [63]. The tagging module associates each token with its POS. The POS tags are based on the Penn Treebank tagset [60,64], some of which are shown in Table 1. Each token is reduced to its root form, depending on its POS. This activity is called lemmatization. For example, worse and better, which are both adjectives, will become bad and good, respectively. Prior to lemmatization, each token is converted to lowercase. Although Witten et al [65] applied stemming for its tokens, we chose lemmatization over stemming since lemmatization returns root words that are always meaningful and exist in the English dictionary. Stemming, on the other hand, may return root words that have no meaning at all since it merely removes prefixes or suffixes based on a rule-based method [66].
Furthermore, the syntactic parsing module deconstructs each sentence into a parse tree and then creates chunks or phrases based on the regular grammar or POS pattern defined in the first step. In other words, the parser’s chunking process involves matching phrases composed of an optional determiner, zero or more of any time of adjective, zero or more of any type of noun, any type of verb (but optional), and an optional component. This component consists of an optional preposition, an optional determiner, zero or more of any type of adjective, and zero or more of any type of noun. The output of this stage is the candidate key phrases.
In the transformation and filtering stage, key phrases that are stop words (ie, words that are commonly used, such as the, a, an, with, in, and that) are removed from candidate key phrases using a predefined list Lstopwords compiled from multiple sources (eg, [67]). We excluded negation words, which are necessary for sentiment detection, such as not, from the list of stop words. In addition, a subset of Lstopwords were removed from the start and end of (and from within) the remaining key phrases in the candidate key phrases such that the meaning of the key phrases is preserved. Afterward, duplicates were removed from the candidate key phrases. Although previous research excluded key phrases above length 6 [50], we included key phrases up to length 10 in our analysis to avoid losing important key phrases that would have enriched insights from this paper. Hence, key phrases containing more than 10 words were removed from the candidate key phrases. Since our focus is on opinionated key phrases (ie, positive and negative key phrases), we applied a filtering technique that involves computing sentiment score for each key phrase and discarding nonopinionated key phrases.
Finally, to identify negative and positive key phrases in the candidate key phrases, the scoring module computes a sentiment score, Sscore, ranging from –1 to 1 for each key phrase using the Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning lexicon-based algorithm [68]. Afterward, each key phrase is assigned a polarity (negative or positive) based on the Sscore using the criteria recommended by Hutto and Gilbert [68]. Specifically, a key phrase is negative if Sscore<–0.05, while a key phrase is positive if Sscore>0.05. A neutral key phrase (with Sscore between –0.05 and 0.05) was removed from the candidate key phrases since it is not opinionated.
Key Phrase Categorization
To answer our RQs, we categorized the final candidate key phrases into categories or broad themes using a thematic analysis approach used by Bekhuis et al [41] to classify clinical phrases into categories. In this approach, expert reviewers manually examine the key phrases and then assign them to appropriate categories. We recruited four reviewers to perform our key phrase categorization task. Specifically, we assigned the negative key phrases to a group of two reviewers (G1) and the positive key phrases to a second group of two reviewers (G2). Each reviewer independently examined the key phrases iteratively and continued to categorize related key phrases until a saturation level was reached (ie, no new categories were emerging from the key phrases). Reviewers used coding sheets in which they indicated the category each key phrase belonged to after examining it. Category names were decided by each reviewer such that a new category was created if none of the existing categories matched the key phrase being reviewed. Since key phrases are more specific than comments, the reviewers assigned each key phrase to only one category. In other words, reviewers assign a key phrase to the most appropriate category or to a new category if none of the existing categories was suitable. After categorizing the key phrases, the reviewers in each team validated each other’s work and agreed or disagreed with the category assigned to each key phrase, and offered suggestions to address every disagreement. The reviewers came together after completing their validations to apply the suggestions and ensure all category names were distinct while harmonizing names that are similar. We measured interrater reliability using the percentage agreement metric [69]. The percentage agreement score for G1 was 98.0%, while the score for G2 was 99.3%. We refer to the categories as themes and the various key phrases under each category as subthemes in the remaining part of this paper.
Results
Key Phrase Extraction
In this section, we discuss the results of our experiments and key phrase categorization. From the large corpus used for the experiment, 427,875 negative and 520,685 positive key phrases were automatically generated. However, the majority of these key phrases were similar; hence, the reviewers reached a saturation point (during key phrase categorization) where no new categories were emerging. In total, 18,694 negative and 19,841 positive key phrases were categorized.
Negative Key Phrases
Multimedia Appendix 1 shows the top 130 negative key phrases and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence. Our results revealed that death (n=10,187) was the dominant negative key phrase, followed by die (n=7240), fight (n=5891), bad (n=3808), kill (n=3668), lose (n=3631), pay (n=3486), leave (n=3234), crisis (n=2783), hard (n=2720), worry (n=2476), sick (n=2314), sad (n=2129), and so on. More negative key phrases can be found in Multimedia Appendix 2, such as national health emergency, scary time, life suck, everyone struggle, dangerous lie, child die, trouble breathe, no medicine, sick people, pay bill, horrible virus, fear coronavirus, extra cautious, steal mask, family die, people in crisis, bad leadership, in house bore, feel horrible, total incompetence, call virus hoax, conspiracy theory ridiculous, take no precaution, serious lockdown, increase in suicide rate, people starve, lack of preparedness, fight menace, and restriction on travel.
Positive Key Phrases
Multimedia Appendix 3 illustrates the top 130 positive key phrases and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence (larger size of the gray oval represents more dominance in the figure in Multimedia Appendix 3). Our results revealed that help (n=18,498) was the dominant key phrase, followed by hope (n=7708), protect (n=7130), love (n=6895), support (n=6198), good (n=5740), share (n=5187), care (n=4917), stay safe (n=4917), and so on. Multimedia Appendix 4 shows more positive key phrases, such as keep everyone safe, clean environment, trust scientific data, create cure, economic relief, encourage business, remain strong, good mask, social distancing best way, generous, respect human right, help prevent further spread, pray for health, social solidarity, support relief effort, protect health worker, good immune system, practice good hand hygiene, speak truth, expand testing, protect vulnerable people, free treatment, and ease anxiety.
Key Phrase Categorization
Overall, 34 negative and 20 positive themes emerged after the key phrase categorization phase discussed in the Methods section. Out of the 34 negative themes, 15 were health-related, psychosocial, and social issues (which were the main focus of this paper and are shown in Tables 2-4). Table 5 shows the 15 negative themes and the corresponding number of key phrases under each theme, while Table 6 shows the negative themes and the total number of comments for each theme. Frustration due to life disruptions emerged as the top negative theme with the highest number of comments, followed by increased mortality, comparison with other diseases or incidents, nature of the disease, and harassment. On the other hand, Table 7 shows the 20 positive themes, description, and sample comments. Table 8 shows the corresponding number of key phrases under each positive theme, while Table 9 shows the total number of comments for each theme. Public awareness emerged as the top positive theme based on the number of comments, followed by spiritual support, encouragement, and charity. By identifying negative and positive themes from COVID-19–related comments, we have answered RQ1 and RQ2, respectively.
Table 2.
Theme | Description | Sample comments |
Increased mortality | Increasing number of deaths due to COVID-19 |
|
Health concerns | Health concerns expressed by people, such as mental health issues (eg, anxiety, depression, stress, or obsessive-compulsive disorder), excessive drinking, migraines, fatigue, and others |
|
Struggling health systems | Inability of health systems to cope with pandemic and give people adequate health care |
|
Fitness issues | Inability to perform usual physical activity or attend fitness sessions and dislike for indoor workout |
|
Rising number of cases | Concerns over rising COVID-19 cases |
|
Nature of disease | Explaining the nature of COVID-19, including its symptoms (eg, cough, loss of taste, and fever), its “no symptom” (or asymptotic) behavior, how it spreads, and vulnerable populations |
|
Comparison with other diseases or incidents | Comparing COVID-19 with other diseases or incidents such as flu, pneumonia, natural disasters, and war |
|
aAll comments are included verbatim, including spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Table 4.
Theme | Description | Sample comments |
Wrong societal attitude | Blaming people’s wrong attitude as causing or fanning the spread (eg, disobeying instructions from governments and health care professionals and eating bats and wild animals) |
|
Domestic violence | Rise in domestic violence cases in homes |
|
Harassment | Harassing and blaming people from certain countries, race, or religion as responsible for the COVID-19 |
|
aAll comments are included verbatim, including spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Table 5.
Themes | Subthemes, n |
Frustration due to life disruptions | 7106 |
Increased mortality | 4938 |
Comparison with other diseases/incidents | 2673 |
Harassment | 870 |
Panic shopping | 799 |
Health concerns | 798 |
Nature of disease | 481 |
Expression of fear | 338 |
Rising number of cases | 200 |
Work from home complaints | 109 |
Wrong societal attitude | 105 |
Fitness issues | 104 |
Domestic violence | 101 |
Struggling health systems | 48 |
Retrospection | 24 |
Table 6.
Themes | Comments, n |
Frustration due to life disruptions | 17,535 |
Increased mortality | 9437 |
Comparison with other diseases/incidents | 6040 |
Nature of disease | 1909 |
Harassment | 1335 |
Health concerns | 1191 |
Panic shopping | 1047 |
Expression of fear | 578 |
Rising number of cases | 264 |
Fitness issues | 151 |
Domestic violence | 123 |
Work from home complaints | 113 |
Wrong societal attitude | 111 |
Struggling health systems | 53 |
Retrospection | 25 |
Table 7.
Theme | Description | Sample comments |
Gratitude | Appreciating health workers, delivery workers, farmers, pilots, security agents, other frontline workers, and the government for their active roles during the pandemic |
|
Public awareness | Raising awareness of the public about general safety and control measures to limit the spread of the disease (eg, good hygiene, social distancing, staying at home, face masks, and healthy eating), addressing misinformation, providing travel guidelines, etc |
|
Cleaner environment | Evidence of cleaner environment, including less pollution and good air quality, due to pandemic-related lockdowns |
|
Evidence of recovery from disease | Evidence of people recovering from COVID-19 with or without treatment |
|
Homemade protective equipment | People’s ingenuity in creating essential protective equipment (eg, face masks and face shields) themselves in their homes or community |
|
Online learning | Public engagement in online learning such as schools teaching students/pupils online and self-development by enrolling in online courses covering different domains |
|
Connection with family and friends | Spending time with family, friends, and loved ones due to pandemic and lockdown |
|
Entertainment | People accessing entertaining content online or offline, such as watching movies on streaming websites and playing games |
|
Charity | Provision of relief packages (including donations, gifts, and fundraising) for individuals, businesses, and hospitals to ease financial burden caused by the pandemic |
|
Advocacy of increased testing | Advocacy of increased testing as a means of curbing the spread by detecting infected people and isolating them quickly |
|
Grassroots support | Extending support to people at the local or community level during the pandemic |
|
Access to necessary tools | Access to tracking or communication tools/features for information dissemination or remote communication during pandemic and lockdown |
|
Spiritual support | Offering prayer of recovery for those with pandemic-related health conditions and those at risk, as well as a show of hope in challenging times |
|
Solidarity for frontline workers | Public call for support and protection of frontline workers such as health workers and delivery workers |
|
Development of curative solutions or treatments | Ongoing efforts by health researchers to develop vaccines or drugs to cure or treat COVID-19 |
|
Physical activity | Efforts made by people to stay active and fit, as well as physical activity suggestions, during lockdown or isolation |
|
Encouragement | Encouraging people to stay calm as they cope with the pandemic situation, encouraging people to view the pandemic from a positive standpoint and stay productive amid the challenges, encouraging people to help others in need and not panic buy, and encouraging people to obey lockdown rules and guidelines released by governments and health professionals |
|
Support for remote working | People’s support for the work from home measure, including adapting/coping with the challenges it brings |
|
Innovative research | Global research efforts to create innovative products to address the pandemic, including developing interventions (eg, digital or technological interventions) that help people socially, physically, emotionally, or psychologically and to improve their overall health and wellness |
|
Traditional remedy | Some suggestions regarding the natural or traditional means of protecting the body from contracting the disease |
|
aAll comments are included verbatim, including spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Table 8.
Themes | Subthemes, n |
Public awareness | 8129 |
Spiritual support | 4139 |
Encouragement | 4033 |
Entertainment | 688 |
Gratitude | 670 |
Charity | 657 |
Development of curative solutions or treatments | 587 |
Advocacy of increased testing | 296 |
Cleaner environment | 214 |
Evidence of recovery from disease | 141 |
Physical activity | 71 |
Connection with family and friends | 61 |
Online learning | 46 |
Access to technology tools | 36 |
Innovative research | 19 |
Grassroots support | 17 |
Homemade protective equipment | 14 |
Support for remote working | 10 |
Solidarity for frontline workers | 7 |
Traditional remedy | 6 |
Table 9.
Themes | Comments, n |
Public awareness | 22,749 |
Spiritual support | 12,130 |
Encouragement | 5244 |
Charity | 942 |
Entertainment | 798 |
Gratitude | 758 |
Development of curative solutions or treatments | 653 |
Advocacy of increased testing | 341 |
Physical activity | 285 |
Cleaner environment | 278 |
Evidence of recovery from disease | 156 |
Connection with family and friends | 70 |
Online learning | 52 |
Access to technology tools | 52 |
Innovative research | 21 |
Grassroots support | 17 |
Homemade protective equipment | 14 |
Support for remote working | 10 |
Traditional remedy | 9 |
Solidarity for frontline workers | 7 |
Table 3.
Theme | Description | Sample comments |
Expression of fear | Expression and spread of fear among people, including fear of infection, sickness, and death |
|
Retrospection | People recalling past life prior to pandemic and wished they got it back |
|
Frustration due to life disruptions | Expression of frustrations over disruption to everyday life, such as consistent homework (for schoolers), more household chores (for moms), difficulty accessing family members or loved ones, sporting event suspension, postponement of planned trips and tours, higher food prices, and restaurants closure |
|
Work from home complaints | Complaints about working from home during pandemic, such as distractions/disturbance, psychological stress, pain, and sleep issues |
|
Panic shopping | People stockpiling groceries and other essential goods due to pandemic |
|
aAll comments are included verbatim, including spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Discussion
Principal Results
In this paper, we analyzed social media comments to uncover insights regarding people’s opinions and perceptions toward the COVID-19 pandemic using an NLP approach. Our empirical findings revealed negative and positive themes (see Tables 2-4 and Table 7) representing negative and positive impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and coping mechanisms on the world population. To answer RQ3, we first discussed each of the negative issues (supported by research evidence) in this section and then suggest interventions to address the issues in a later section.
Negative Issues Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic
Tables 2-4 show the negative themes grouped under health-related issues, psychosocial issues, and social issues from our results. The health-related issues included health concerns, increased mortality, struggling health systems, fitness issues, nature of disease, rising number of cases, and comparison with other diseases or incidents. The psychosocial issues were expression of fear, panic shopping, retrospection, work-from-home issues, and frustration due to life disruptions. The social issues were wrong societal attitude, domestic violence, and harassment.
Health-Related Issues
Evidence shows a rapid increase in the number of COVID-19 cases and a high case-fatality rate of 7.2% [70]. In addition, a substantial number of patients who are infected had severe pneumonia or were critically ill [70]. Another study revealed the mental health issues experienced by people and health professionals directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic [71], and the global health care systems’ inability to deal with the outbreak [72]. The themes under this category are discussed in the following subsections. They align with existing research and uncovered additional insights with respect to the health-related issues caused by COVID-19 and witnessed by people worldwide.
Health Concerns
Based on our findings, people experienced various mental health issues (eg, anxiety, depression, stress, or obsessive compulsive disorder) during the pandemic. This is possibly due to the length of time spent staying at home (which may be traumatic for some people while causing loneliness for others), worrying about being infected with the disease and difficult living conditions, as well as guilt on the part of health care workers who feel responsible for being unable to save their patients from death. Research confirms that worry is associated with anxiety and depression [73]. Cases of mental health disorders linked to COVID-19 have also been reported [74]. Furthermore, people expressed other concerns like excessive drinking, migraines, chest pains, mild to severe fatigue, nasal mucosal ulcers, sleep disorders, and others. The following are sample comments:
Cannot sleep. Mind is racing. Feeling anxious.
C6648
I am so stressed and my anxiety has hit the roof. I am anxious about money and how we will cope?
C238
This coronavirus outbreak is more stressful for the family. Doing my best to keep sanitized and safe. But, fear of the invisible killer lingers on, taking a mental toll on my mother, wife, son, who are petrified every time I walk out of the main door.
C116
The chest pains today is beyond. It kinda have crawled up a bit and I feel like I put my hand on my heart from time to time. Very tired today. But weirdly still no fever. But I am cold and I feel sick.
We have only been in for 3 weeks we are already feeling anxiety, depression severe, so we decided to think of some ways we can keep ourselves each other in good spirits.
C8263
Increased Mortality
People attested to an increase in death rates in many countries across different continents including North America, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Australia, as shown in the following sample comments. Many countries, especially those in Africa, started reporting deaths from COVID-19 (see C1264). Our findings also revealed people of varying demographics died from the disease, including teenagers, adults, and older adults, as well as those with or without underlying health conditions (see C8837 and C940).
This is why America leads the world in the death toll already, and the pace still is not showing any signs of slackening.
C3399
UK coronavirus death rate DOUBLES as 381 die in 24 hours and boy, 13, with no health problems becomes youngest victim
C8837
Turkish health minister shares latest coronavirus data: 16 more people have died, bringing death toll to 108
C9000
Kenya has recorded the first death. According to Health Cabinet Secretary,...the 66 years old man died on 26th in the afternoon at the AghaKhan hospital intensive care unit.
C1264
100 more UK deaths in last 24h alone. These are not all elderly co-morbid people. Among these are the young, and the fit...
C940
Struggling Health Systems
Health systems worldwide are struggling to cope with the surge in the number of patients with COVID-19 and in most cases are unable to admit patients due to limited resources [75]. Research has shown that health care burden due to COVID-19 is associated with the increase in mortality rate [76]. As revealed in the following sample comments, our findings corroborated evidence of overstretched global health systems during this pandemic.
Hospitals turning away coronavirus patients in California. EMTALA being used to set up tents outside of hospital ER, then dumping patients without treatment or testing. I obtained recordings of standard hospital practice of rejecting Covid19 patients.
C4949
These are not just numbers. These are people and families. These lives can be saved if the chunk of $2.2 Trillion are not used for bailing out corporations and used to fix the broken US Health System.
C3000
Fitness Issues
Evidence argues that the prevalence of physical inactivity worldwide due to nationwide quarantines or lockdowns [77]. This was confirmed in our findings, which showed that people have trouble staying fit due to an inability to control eating habits or urges while at home and have a personal dislike for indoor-only workouts, as shown in the following comments. Physical inactivity has been linked to coronary heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and mental health issues [78-80], which, in turn, are risk factors for mortality in COVID-19 adult inpatients [81].
...severely missing my gym, missing routine, and cannot control my eating while at home. Things are getting bad.
C9002
During this shelter in place, I was gonna eat healthy and kill some workouts. But instead I've been Guy Fieri'ing around the kitchen sampling all my quarantine food every 2 hours. At this point, which will get me first - coronavirus or a coronary?
C7182
Nature of Disease
People expressed their opinion about the nature of COVID-19 based on their experiences and information available to them. As shown in the following sample comments, people with underlying health conditions (eg, diabetes or heart disease) are at higher risk of developing severe complications from the disease. In addition, the asymptotic attribute of COVID-19 is also discussed, and the possibility of the virus infecting some critical immune cells that may lead to the failure of sensitive organs like the lungs. People also perceived the disease as racial- or nationality–independent but seems to pose more risk to men than women. The disease is also seen as highly contagious and shows symptoms such as cough, fever, fatigue, loss of smell, muscle aches, and respiratory-related symptoms (eg, shortness of breath). These findings align with clinical evidence regarding COVID-19 [82-87].
Some WTC Health Program members with certain health conditions...may be at a higher risk of serious illness from COVID19
C3620
...Majority do not show symptoms while spreading Covid_19
...If the coronavirus infects some of the immune cells then there is a cellular catastrophe and organs like lungs are gone within hours.
C9200
Coronavirus is a disease that pays no attention to borders, race or nationality. However, it appears COVID-19 does pose a noticeably bigger threat to men than it does to women.
C1902
This is absolutely true. If you have a combination of cough, fever, problems smelling, weakness, muscle aches or shortness of breath, assume you have covid19. Don't bother getting tested. I know of many docs who don't test anymore if patient has obvious symptoms.
C2729
Rising Number of Cases
Our findings show that more people are getting infected with COVID-19 in many parts of the world, as shown in the following sample comments. Evidence confirms increasing numbers of COVID-19 cases in North America [88,89] and Europe [90], as well as a growing concern for vulnerable continents such as Africa [91].
There is rapid increase in cases of COVID19 in India...I request PM to extend the lockdown to avoid community spread.
C1325
Despite infection cases increasing at exponential rate doubling every 3 days, Trump pushes workers to risk their lives for economy...
C6522
Comparison With Other Diseases or Incidents
Our findings revealed that people compare COVID-19 with other diseases such as the flu (eg, Spanish flu and H1N1 swine flu) and SARS, and with more extreme incidents such as war. However, although some people tend to downplay the severity of COVID-19 (see C647), others think it is dangerous or frightening (see C922 and C45). Research has shown that COVID-19 has a higher transmissibility rate than SARS [92] and has killed more people than SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome combined [93], thereby making it a highly contagious and lethal disease.
It is just another strain of flu. People with weak and have health problem it will affect different than people with stronger and not so much health problems. Media is making it sound worse...
C647
I was not at all concerned about swine flu, I was not at all concerned about Ebola, I was not at all concerned about Zika virus, but this virus I was concerned about going all the way back to January. If I had enough information to be concerned about this virus, then so did they. We are a month behind on dealing with this virus and there are no excuses, even a lay person like myself knew all the way back in January that this was bigger than anything that has come before it in my lifetime...
C922
This is a war. We need to protect ourselves and minimize unnecessary contact to avoid another Spanish flu that killed 50 million people...
C45
Psychosocial Issues
Expression of Fear and Panic Shopping
Based on our findings, people are fearful or scared about COVID-19, and although many expressed genuine fear (including those who had lost loved ones to the disease, contracted the disease, or had an infected family member), others attributed it to fear mongering that is further amplified by the media. As a result of this fear, many people engaged in panic buying to stockpile essential items so they can stay indoors and limit movements for some days or weeks to keep themselves and their families safe. The following are sample comments:
Very frightening when people who have travelled think that covid cannot affect them. Such foolish behaviour and thoughts putting all of us at risk. Those who travelled please STOP moving around and be at home.
C8887
Fear mongering through projecting number of possible deaths. The media is disgusting.
C5559
Everyone who is panic shopping is driving my family and me nuts...Everyone in our area is panic-buying groceries. We can't get noodles, rice, or really any real staple foods. We hardly have any food already. I'm kinda scared.
C2937
Work From Home Complaints
Furthermore, the pandemic triggered work from home (or remote work) measures to promote continuity of businesses during lockdown [94], but this may have negative implications on people’s lifestyle and well-being. For example, people found consistently working from home exhausting, boring, and distracting with kids at home. In addition, people living in countries without stable electricity and strong internet found it difficult and more costly to work from home, as they have to fuel their generators and pay more for considerably good internet connectivity. Evidence has shown that people work longer hours at home than on site due to difficulty in maintaining clear delineation between work and nonwork domains [95], thereby leading to work–family conflict and strain [96]. The following are sample comments:
Do you find working from home exhausting? You are not alone. Why is that and how can you combat it?
This thing of working from home annoys. Waking up at 4 am to have things done before the Boy wakes up. Otherwise you will spend better part of the day watching cartoons with no work done.
C9902
It is very clear from today's program how the government is not organized or coordinated with this issue. How should one work from home with constant power cuts and bad internet?
C8855
Frustration Due to Life Disruptions and Retrospection
Finally, people are generally frustrated about life disruptions caused by COVID-19 (which is the top issue based on our empirical findings as shown in Table 6). Based on our findings, this frustration is mostly due to decreased leisure and interaction with friends and family, authorities’ actions and inactions, and uncertainty of upcoming situations, which leads to cognitive dissonance [97], insecurity, and mental discomfort [98]. People expressed their frustrations using words reflecting anger and unhappiness or sadness, as shown in the following sample comments. Research has shown that positive emotions (eg, happiness) and life satisfaction decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic [99]. Therefore, it is unsurprising that people missed (and crave for) their prepandemic lives, in retrospection (see C377).
I am getting more and more angry with this current situation we are in. My favourite show has had to postpone its final episode, after already postponing series 11...
C7776
We are literally living in a time when arbitrary shit is more important than health, wellness and preservation of life. Entitlement. Ignorance. Selfishness. An untouchable mentality. Humanity at its absolute worst. April's going to be a painful month to live through.
C1228
I cannot wait until this whole thing is OVER. I miss doing nails. I miss being in my element and doing the creative things I enjoy. I have no practice hand; I have no work; I feel lost. I was just licensed in Jan!
C377
Social Issues
Wrong Societal Attitude
Our findings revealed disapproval and concerns about people’s defiance of precautionary measures or guidelines (eg, social distancing and travel guidelines) to curb the spread of COVID-19 (see C7218 and C1444) and some people’s habit of eating animals assumed to be carriers of viruses (see C4013). Research has highlighted certain factors responsible for reduced compliance with public health guidelines, such as poverty, economic dislocation, lack of compensation, and mistrust of science [100-102].
The only good thing about Coronavirus is that it will cull the stupid people from amongst us - those that do not take it seriously and continue to gather in public, those that go overseas to attend weddings and other events when they know the risk...
C7218
The public response to this crisis in the UK has been absolutely pathetic. Showing we are an entitled society who cannot handle being told what to do. Embarrassing that people cannot follow simple instruction.
C1444
Why is that someone who knows how dangerous eating these animals are and still go right ahead and eat. Is it that they do not have any sense or is it just irresponsible stupid people to do this then what are they crazy or just insane?
C4013
Domestic Violence
Furthermore, an increase in domestic violence incidents was reported as a result of the COVID-19–related lockdown, as shown in the following comments. Evidence already confirms the link between COVID-19 and the rising cases of domestic violence worldwide [103-107].
Cases of domestic violence in the USA has skyrocketed since the CoronaVirus forced couples to stay home together for 14 days or more.
C9900
While domestic violence across France increased by 32% in one week, in Paris it rose by as much as 36%.
What worries me more than the coronavirus, is the safety and welfare of those stuck at home with their abusers, the children witnessing domestic violence and the lonely relying on company. Staying home is not always safer.
C7910
Harassment
Our findings also uncovered undue harassment of people from certain cultures, races, or religious background, accusing them of spreading COVID-19. The following sample comments reveal public intimidation and racist attacks toward Chinese and Asians as well as certain Indian tribes. This aligns with evidence of widespread anti-Chinese and anti-Asian xenophobic or racist attacks, especially in the United States, both physically and on social media [108-113].
...This supermarket refuses to sell the food to the CHINESE! We should stop going to this supermarket! We strongly against RACISM towards Chinese people abroad! THIS MUST STOP!
C2008
Coronavirus has only taught me one thing; some people are so racist, especially on this platform. The amount of hate, racist comments and abuse I am seeing Chinese/Asian people get is painful.
C5000
Indians got racism in their blood, breath, and beyond. A Mizo girl faced racism in Pune as a woman kept covering a face whenever the Mizo girl passed by. A friend Naga from maternal side in Mumbai, got called corona virus in the middle of an empty road.
C6660
Recommended Interventions for Addressing the Negative Issues
In this section, we suggest interventions that can help address the negative issues while drawing insights from the positive themes and relevant research evidence. This answers our RQ3.
As lockdown and physical distancing persists, people with health concerns should be able to receive medical attention without visiting a hospital. Considering the proliferation of smartphones and the current wave of global digitization, digital interventions using mobile, artificial intelligence (AI), internet of things (IoT), and virtual reality technologies have been shown to be effective for delivering remote health care (or telehealth) to patients [114-119]. This is based on our findings under the innovative research positive theme (see Table 7), which revealed global research efforts to create digital interventions using emerging technologies to address the health crisis caused by COVID-19. For example, mobile apps that detect mental health issues (eg, depression and anxiety) based on phone sensors (or wearable sensors) data and self-reports using machine learning and deep learning models, and then guide users through therapeutic procedures or treatments will be useful tools during and after the pandemic. In addition, these apps should allow users to book appointments with doctors, clinicians, or therapists and access remote medical advice, diagnosis, and treatments when necessary.
In addition, data-driven surveillance systems based on AI that predict the location of the next COVID-19 outbreak can enhance the effectiveness of containment efforts, thereby slowing the spread of the disease and reducing the case-fatality rate. Furthermore, the development of curative solutions or treatments (see Table 7) can be accelerated by leveraging machine learning and deep learning algorithms. For example, deep learning models can be used to predict chemical compounds that can halt viral replication and to suggest drugs that can be effective against the virus.
To address fitness issues during lockdown, physical activity (which is one of the positive themes in our results) programs or sessions with personalized feedback delivered through mobile apps would be helpful. Research has shown that smartphone-based health programs yield significant weight loss and increase physical activity [120]. There is also an urgent need to strengthen the global health care systems to cope with current and future pandemics through public and private investments in the health sector on an ongoing basis, such as provision of public health infrastructure that is robust and adequate for the target population and easily accessible and the provision of health insurance for everyone irrespective of financial status.
Public awareness (which emerged as the top positive theme in our findings) is also crucial for addressing negative issues arising from COVID-19 by providing timely and accurate information to people, which can be lifesaving. To reach a wider audience in an efficient manner and with less cost, public awareness can be delivered through mobile technologies, such as mobile-driven and voice-enabled conversational AI agents (or chatbots) with access to evidence-based and clinically validated resources (eg, precautionary or safety measures approved by public health agencies and organizations as well as government-approved policies or guidelines), can deliver accurate information regarding COVID-19 to people in their own native language (and in an interactive fashion) through their smartphones. These chatbots can also be made to route difficult questions to health experts for real-time feedback within the same chat session. This will help to improve people’s understanding of the disease, including how it differs from other infectious diseases, and how to protect themselves and their families from getting infected with COVID-19. In addition, people will be empowered with information required to effectively respond to fear mongering, domestic violence, and harassment. Evidence already shows the deployment of multilingual chatbots for public health awareness on COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis, and precautionary measures [121]. Furthermore, chatbots can also respond to emergencies by contacting appropriate security agencies and emergency response teams on behalf of the users. Moreover, chatbots can deliver evidence-based therapeutic interventions to people while coordinating with specialists behind the scenes where necessary.
For people with nonsmartphone devices, public health agencies can partner with telecommunication companies to deliver COVID-19–related information directly to their phones as text messages at regular intervals. Social media is another platform through which evidence-based information can be shared with the public but may be overshadowed by fake news or false information, which is mostly shared on social media [122]. Nevertheless, official COVID-19–related channels managed by (or in conjunction with) reputable international health organizations (eg, World Health Organization) or local health authorities within the social media platforms, many of which have already been deployed, provide accurate information or updates about COVID-19 cases, fatality rates, and safety measures and guidelines [123,124]. In addition, people receive location-based updates on these channels, including emergency alerts, in a timely and effective manner.
Finally, based on our findings (see Table 7), connection with family and friends, encouragement, spiritual support, and charity can help to ease people’s frustrations, anxiety, and trauma (due to life disruptions caused by the pandemic) by addressing their emotional, physical, and spiritual needs. Evidence shows that psychological first aid and spiritual care can promote a sense of safety, calmness, self- and collective–efficacy, connectedness, and hope, as well as help people confront and overcome fear [125]. Therefore, people should endeavor to frequently communicate and follow up with loved ones (through direct voice or video calls or by using social media), encourage others in distress to stay calm and remain positive, identify people’s immediate needs and offer necessary assistance, help people find hope and meaning, and ensure the safety and comfort of vulnerable populations.
Mobile technology can play a key role in facilitating easy access to relief packages. For instance, mobile apps can be deployed with geolocation and multilingual features to help people locate the nearest food bank and charity organizations offering assistance in their geographical area. In addition, charity organizations can effectively mobilize and deliver relief items to more people, including individuals that are indisposed, based on data collected through these apps. In addition, older adults, the sick, and those in self-isolation can indicate their condition while requesting for relief so that their items can be delivered to their doorstep instead of picking it up. These apps can further integrate with other local and international charity organizations to widen the coverage of relief efforts. Recruitment of volunteers can also take place through these apps. The use data collected can be further analyzed in real time and used to predict the communities that are in dire need of assistance using machine learning or deep learning techniques.
Limitations
In this study, we analyzed data from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and three discussion forums. However, people may have used other social media platforms such as Instagram and other discussion forums not covered in this study to disseminate information related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, our findings may not fully reflect the entire public’s opinion on social media with respect to the pandemic. Nevertheless, to have a reasonably broad understanding of public opinions, we analyzed over 1 million social media comments compared to only a few thousand commonly analyzed in many related studies. In addition, the thematic analysis used for theme categorization may be more robust; however, the large number of key phrases rendered this process time-consuming despite filtering out many irrelevant key phrases during experimentation. Accordingly, the saturation level and subsequent review and confirmation of the theme categories from a second reviewer and coder were introduced as an acceptable compromise.
Conclusions
In this paper, we explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people worldwide using social media data. We analyzed over 1 million comments obtained from six social media platforms using a seven-stage NLP approach to extract candidate key phrases, which we further categorized into broad themes using thematic analysis. Our results revealed 34 negative themes, out of which 15 were health-related issues, psychosocial issues, and social issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic from the public perspective. The top health-related issues were increased mortality, comparison with other diseases or incidents, nature of disease, and health concerns, while the top psychosocial issues were frustrations due to life disruptions, panic shopping, and expression of fear. The top social issues were harassment and domestic violence. Besides the negative themes, 20 positive themes emerged from our results. Some of the positive themes were public awareness, encouragement, gratitude, cleaner environment, online learning, charity, spiritual support, and innovative research. We reflected on our findings and recommend interventions that can help address the health, psychosocial, and social issues based on the positive themes and other research evidence.
Digital interventions using emerging technologies such as mobile apps, AI, IoT, and virtual reality will play a major role in delivering remote health care (ie, telemedicine or telehealth) to people in the comfort of their homes, including empowering them to self-manage their health and wellness. This will help to curb the spread of COVID-19 and future infectious diseases since many people will stay away from hospitals (or clinics) to book appointments or see doctors (or other health care professionals) unless it is absolutely necessary to visit, thereby keeping health workers and patients safe. These technologies are also useful in providing timely and accurate information about COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, precautionary and safety measures and guidelines, and other relevant information to target audience worldwide. Finally, digital interventions and other interventions discussed in this paper can help address the emotional, physical, and spiritual needs of people who are traumatized or frustrated by the disruptions caused by the pandemic. They also inform governments, health professionals and agencies, and institutions on how to react to the current COVID-19 pandemic and future pandemics.
Acknowledgments
This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program. The authors acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the Discovery Grant. They also thank the DeepSense team at Dalhousie University and Compute Canada for providing the computing infrastructure used to perform our research experiments.
Abbreviations
- AI
artificial intelligence
- API
application programming interface
- IoT
internet of things
- LDA
latent Dirichlet allocation
- NLP
natural language processing
- POS
part of speech
- RQ
research question
- SARS
severe acute respiratory syndrome
Appendix
Top 130 negative themes and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence (larger size of the gray oval represents more dominance).
Sample negative themes.
Top 130 positive themes and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence (larger size of the gray oval represents more dominance).
Sample positive themes.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions: OO collected data, conducted the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. CN, DM, BS, and AA collected data, categorized the themes, and reviewed the manuscript. RO is the research supervisor and reviewed the manuscript. FAO is a data analyst and researcher, and reviewed the manuscript. SM is a psychiatry and epidemiology researcher, and reviewed the manuscript. CC is a clinical psychologist and reviewed the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
- 1.Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. In: Price-Smith AT, editor. Plagues and Politics: Infectious Disease and International Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001. pp. 8–26. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kimberlin DW. Red Book: 2018-2021 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018. p. 152. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2004 Jul 08;430(6996):242–9. doi: 10.1038/nature02759. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/15241422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jilani TN, Jamil RT, Siddiqui AH. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2018. H1N1 influenza. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dawood FS, Iuliano AD, Reed C, Meltzer MI, Shay DK, Cheng P, Bandaranayake D, Breiman RF, Brooks WA, Buchy P, Feikin DR, Fowler KB, Gordon A, Hien NT, Horby P, Huang QS, Katz MA, Krishnan A, Lal R, Montgomery JM, Mølbak K, Pebody R, Presanis AM, Razuri H, Steens A, Tinoco YO, Wallinga J, Yu H, Vong S, Bresee J, Widdowson M. Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;12(9):687–95. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70121-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.HIV/AIDS. World Health Organization. 2019. [2020-05-16]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids.
- 7.Ebola virus disease. World Health Organization. 2020. [2020-05-16]. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ebola-virus-disease. [PubMed]
- 8.Tian H, Liu Y, Li Y, Wu C, Chen B, Kraemer MUG, Li B, Cai J, Xu B, Yang Q, Wang B, Yang P, Cui Y, Song Y, Zheng P, Wang Q, Bjornstad ON, Yang R, Grenfell BT, Pybus OG, Dye C. An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020 May 08;368(6491):638–642. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32234804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen Y, Wang W, Song Z, Hu Y, Tao Z, Tian J, Pei Y, Yuan M, Zhang Y, Dai F, Liu Y, Wang Q, Zheng J, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang Y. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32015508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. [2020-05-16]. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
- 11.Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008 Feb 21;451(7181):990–3. doi: 10.1038/nature06536. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18288193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bloom DE, Black S, Rappuoli R. Emerging infectious diseases: a proactive approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4055–4059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701410114. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=28396438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fan VY, Jamison DT, Summers LH. The inclusive cost of pandemic influenza risk. Natl Bureau Econ Res. 2016 doi: 10.3386/w22137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barbier G, Liu H. Data mining in social media. In: Aggarwal CC, editor. Social Network Data Analytics. Boston, MA: Springer; 2011. pp. 327–352. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kemp S. Digital 2020: global digital overview. DataReportal. 2020. [2020-05-17]. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview.
- 16.Robinson P, Turk D, Jilka S, Cella M. Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;54(1):51–58. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1571-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30069754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guntuku SC, Buffone A, Jaidka K, Eichstaedt JC, Ungar LH. Understanding and measuring psychological stress using social media. Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media; June 11-14, 2019; Münich, Germany. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07430. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Golder S, Chiuve S, Weissenbacher D, Klein A, O'Connor K, Bland M, Malin M, Bhattacharya M, Scarazzini LJ, Gonzalez-Hernandez G. Pharmacoepidemiologic evaluation of birth defects from health-related postings in social media during pregnancy. Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;42(3):389–400. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0731-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rezaallah B, Lewis DJ, Pierce C, Zeilhofer H, Berg B. Social media surveillance of multiple sclerosis medications used during pregnancy and breastfeeding: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 07;21(8):e13003. doi: 10.2196/13003. https://www.jmir.org/2019/8/e13003/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blumenthal KG, Topaz M, Zhou L, Harkness T, Sa'adon R, Bar-Bachar O, Long AA. Mining social media data to assess the risk of skin and soft tissue infections from allergen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jul;144(1):129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.029. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30721764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang Y, Huang D, Nguyen QC. Census tract food tweets and chronic disease outcomes in the U.S., 2015⁻2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 18;16(6) doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060975. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph16060975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oyebode O, Orji R. Detecting factors responsible for diabetes prevalence in Nigeria using social media and machine learning. 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management; October 21-25, 2019; Halifax, NS. 2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhan Y, Etter J, Leischow S, Zeng D. Electronic cigarette usage patterns: a case study combining survey and social media data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jan 01;26(1):9–18. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy140. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30544163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hassanpour S, Tomita N, DeLise T, Crosier B, Marsch LA. Identifying substance use risk based on deep neural networks and Instagram social media data. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Feb;44(3):487–494. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0247-x. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30356094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Comito C, Forestiero A, Papuzzo G. Exploiting social media to enhance clinical decision support. WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence; WI '19; October 2019; Thessaloniki, Greece. 2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huber J, Woods T, Fushi A, Duong M, Eidelman A, Zalal A, Urquhart O, Colangelo E, Quinn S, Carrasco-Labra A. Social media research strategy to understand clinician and public perception of health care messages. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Jan;5(1):71–81. doi: 10.1177/2380084419849439. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2380084419849439?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tumasjan A, Sprenger T, Sandner P, Welpe I. Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; May 23-26, 2010; Washington, DC. 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Budiharto W, Meiliana M. Prediction and analysis of Indonesia Presidential election from Twitter using sentiment analysis. J Big Data. 2018 Dec 19;5(1) doi: 10.1186/s40537-018-0164-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tjong E, Sang K, Bos J. Predicting the 2011 Dutch Senate election results with Twitter. 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; April 23-27, 2012; Avignon, France. 2012. pp. 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oyebode O, Orji R. Social media and sentiment analysis: the Nigeria Presidential Election 2019. 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference; October 17-19, 2019; Vancouver, BC. 2019. pp. 140–146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bright J, Hale S, Ganesh B, Bulovsky A, Margetts H, Howard P. Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence From Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections. Commun Res. 2019 Sep 11;47(7):988–1009. doi: 10.1177/0093650219872394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ma J, Tse YK, Wang X, Zhang M. Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – an empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis. Transportation Res Part E Logistics Transportation Rev. 2019 Jul;127:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ibrahim N, Wang X. Decoding the sentiment dynamics of online retailing customers: time series analysis of social media. Comput Hum Behav. 2019 Jul;96:32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.corona virus covid-19 and you. Archinect. [2020-04-02]. https://archinect.com/forum/thread/150187455/corona-virus-covid-19-and-you.
- 37.COVID - 19 Thread Central. Archinect. [2020-04-02]. https://archinect.com/forum/thread/150188615/covid-19-thread-central.
- 38.Live Science Forums. [2020-04-02]. https://forums.livescience.com/forums/coronavirus-epidemiology.42/
- 39.Topic: corona virus panic/discussion thread. Push Square. [2020-04-02]. https://www.pushsquare.com/forums/ps_general_discussion/corona_virus_panicdiscussion_thread.
- 40.Abdalla M, Abdalla M, Hirst G, Rudzicz F. Exploring the privacy-preserving properties of word embeddings: algorithmic validation study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 15;22(7):e18055. doi: 10.2196/18055. https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e18055/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bekhuis T, Kreinacke M, Spallek H, Song M, O'Donnell JA. Using natural language processing to enable in-depth analysis of clinical messages posted to an internet mailing list: a feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 23;13(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1799. https://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e98/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grajales F, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 11;16(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2912. https://www.jmir.org/2014/2/e13/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Conway M, Hu M, Chapman WW. Recent advances in using natural language processing to address public health research questions using social media and consumer generated data. Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug;28(1):208–217. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677918. http://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-1677918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Park A, Conway M. Tracking health related discussions on Reddit for public health applications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1362–1371. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29854205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jelodar H, Wang Y, Orji R, Huang S. Deep sentiment classification and topic discovery on novel coronavirus or COVID-19 online discussions: NLP using LSTM recurrent neural network approach. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Oct;24(10):2733–2742. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3001216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nobles A, Dreisbach C, Keim-Malpass J, Barnes L. "Is this a STD? Please help!": online information seeking for sexually transmitted diseases on reddit. Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2018 Jun;2018:660–663. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30984474. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paul M, Dredze M. You are what you tweet: analyzing Twitter for public health. Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; July 17-21, 2011; Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 48.McNeill A, Harris PR, Briggs P. Twitter influence on UK vaccination and antiviral uptake during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2016;4:26. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Oyebode O, Alqahtani F, Orji R. Using machine learning and thematic analysis methods to evaluate mental health apps based on user reviews. IEEE Access. 2020;8:111141–111158. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3002176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dave KS, Varma V. Pattern based keyword extraction for contextual advertising. Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management; CIKM '10; October 2010; Toronto, ON. 2010. pp. 1885–1888. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ahmed W, Bath PA, Sbaffi L, Demartini G. Novel insights into views towards H1N1 during the 2009 pandemic: a thematic analysis of Twitter data. Health Info Libr J. 2019 Mar;36(1):60–72. doi: 10.1111/hir.12247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Consuming streaming data. Twitter Developer. [2020-05-20]. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tutorials/consuming-streaming-data.
- 53.Popular hashtags for coronavirus on Twitter and Instagram. RiteTag. [2020-03-18]. https://ritetag.com/best-hashtags-for/coronavirus.
- 54.Lustig H. Increasingly dark internet trends reveal a growing cynicism about the coronavirus pandemic and our future. Insider. 2020. [2020-03-18]. https://www.insider.com/coronavirus-twitter-hashtags-reveal-growing-cynicism-about-pandemic-survival-2020-3.
- 55.YouTube Data API. Google Developers. [2020-05-20]. https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3.
- 56.Slang words dictionary. GitHub. [2019-06-19]. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sifei/Dictionary-for-Sentiment-Analysis/master/slang/acrynom.csv.
- 57.Slang lookup table. GitHub. [2019-06-19]. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felipebravom/StaticTwitterSent/master/extra/SentiStrength/SlangLookupTable.txt.
- 58.Liu B. Sentence subjectivity and sentiment classification. Sentiment Analysis Mining Opinions Sentiments Emotions. 2015:70–89. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781139084789.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nelson G. English: An Essential Grammar. England: Taylor & Francis; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Santorini B. Part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the penn treebank project (3rd revision) Tech Rep. 1990:570. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Asmuth JA, Gentner D. Context sensitivity of relational nouns. Proc Annu Meeting Cognitive Sci Soc. 2005;27(27):163–168. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chesley P, Vincent B, Xu L, Srihari RK. Using verbs and adjectives to automatically classify blog sentiment. Training. 2006;580(263):233. [Google Scholar]
- 63.nltk.tokenize package. NLTK 3.5 documentation. [2020-05-23]. http://www.nltk.org/api/nltk.tokenize.html?highlight=tokenizer#nltk.tokenize.punkt.PunktSentenceTokenizer.
- 64.Taylor A, Marcus M, Santorini B. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Springer; 2003. The Penn Treebank: an overview; pp. 5–22. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Witten IH, Paynter GW, Frank E, Gutwin C, Nevill-Manning CG. KEA: practical automatic keyphrase extraction. arXiv. 1999. Feb 04, [2020-06-24]. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9902007.
- 66.Han P, Shen S, Wang D, Liu Y. The influence of word normalization in English document clustering. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering; May 25-27, 2012; Zhangjiajie, China. 2012. pp. 116–120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.sebleier/NLTK's list of english stopwords. GitHub Gists. [2020-05-26]. https://gist.github.com/sebleier/554280.
- 68.Hutto C, Gilbert E. VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; June 1-4, 2014; Ann Arbor, MI. 2014. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewPaper/8109. [Google Scholar]
- 69.McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22(3):276–82. http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2012/22/276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775–1776. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xiang Y, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, Ng CH. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228–229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32032543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hick JL, Biddinger PD. Novel coronavirus and old lessons - preparing the health system for the pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):e55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dar KA, Iqbal N, Mushtaq A. Intolerance of uncertainty, depression, and anxiety: examining the indirect and moderating effects of worry. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Oct;29:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yao H, Chen J, Xu Y. Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e21. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30090-0. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32199510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, Zhang C, Boyle C, Smith M, Phillips JP. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049–2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ji Y, Ma Z, Peppelenbosch MP, Pan Q. Potential association between COVID-19 mortality and health-care resource availability. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e480. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30068-1. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-109X(20)30068-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hall G, Laddu DR, Phillips SA, Lavie CJ, Arena R. A tale of two pandemics: how will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;64:108–110. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.005. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32277997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A, Pentti J, Sabia S, Nyberg ST, Alfredsson L, Goldberg M, Knutsson A, Koskenvuo M, Koskinen A, Kouvonen A, Nordin M, Oksanen T, Strandberg T, Suominen SB, Theorell T, Vahtera J, Väänänen Ari, Virtanen M, Westerholm P, Westerlund H, Zins M, Seshadri S, Batty GD, Sipilä PN, Shipley MJ, Lindbohm JV, Ferrie JE, Jokela M, IPD-Work consortium Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: an individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019 Apr 17;365:l1495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1495. http://www.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=30995986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Rubin GJ. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32112714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lippi G, Henry BM, Sanchis-Gomar F. Physical inactivity and cardiovascular disease at the time of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Jun;27(9):906–908. doi: 10.1177/2047487320916823. https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/article-lookup/doi/10.1177/2047487320916823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32171076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, Deng X, Wang J, Hao X, Lau YC, Wong JY, Guan Y, Tan X, Mo X, Chen Y, Liao B, Chen W, Hu F, Zhang Q, Zhong M, Wu Y, Zhao L, Zhang F, Cowling BJ, Li F, Leung GM. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672–675. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jin J, Bai P, He W, Wu F, Liu X, Han D, Liu S, Yang J. Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: focus on severity and mortality. Front Public Health. 2020;8:152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin D, Chen L, Wang M. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406–1407. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32083643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 May;20(5):269–270. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32273594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zheng Y, Ma Y, Zhang J, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 May;17(5):259–260. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32139904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.CDC COVID-19 Response Team Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 - United States, February 12-March 28, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 03;69(13):382–386. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Scarabel F, Pellis L, Bragazzi NL, Wu J. Canada needs to rapidly escalate public health interventions for its COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.03.004. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468-0427(20)30010-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.CDC COVID-19 Response Team Geographic differences in COVID-19 cases, deaths, and incidence - United States, February 12-April 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):465–471. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yuan J, Li M, Lv G, Lu ZK. Monitoring transmissibility and mortality of COVID-19 in Europe. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:311–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.050. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1201-9712(20)30182-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kobia F, Gitaka J. COVID-19: are Africa's diagnostic challenges blunting response effectiveness? AAS Open Res. 2020;3:4. doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.13061.1. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32399515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J Travel Med. 2020 Mar 13;27(2) doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa021. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32052846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mahase E. Coronavirus covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate. BMJ. 2020 Feb 18;368:m641. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gottlieb C, Grobovsek J, Poschke M. Working from home across countries. Covid Economics. 2020;1(8):71–91. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dockery M, Bawa S. Working from home in the COVID-19 lockdown. Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre. 2020. May, [2020-06-22]. https://bcec.edu.au/assets/2020/05/BCEC-COVID19-Brief-4_Working-from-home.pdf.
- 96.Thomas LT, Ganster DC. Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: a control perspective. J Appl Psychol. 1995;80(1):6–15. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Foulds GA. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Br J Psychiatry. 1963;109(458):164–165. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tsai J, Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G, Balluz LS. Physical activity and optimal self-rated health of adults with and without diabetes. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 23;10:365. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-365. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-10-365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: a study on active Weibo users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;17(6) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062032. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph17062032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bodas M, Peleg K. Self-isolation compliance in the COVID-19 era influenced by compensation: findings from a recent survey in Israel. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020 Jun;39(6):936–941. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wright AL, Sonin K, Driscoll J, Wilson J. Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols. J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Dec;180:544–554. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Plohl N, Musil B. Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bradbury-Jones C, Isham L. The pandemic paradox: the consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2047–2049. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15296. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32281158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Taub A. A new Covid-19 crisis: domestic abuse rises worldwide. Chester County Community Foundation. 2020. [2020-06-21]. https://chescocf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Domestic-Abuse-Rises-Worldwide-New-York-Times.pdf.
- 105.Mazza M, Marano G, Lai C, Janiri L, Sani G. Danger in danger: interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113046. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32387794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Piquero AR, Riddell JR, Bishopp SA, Narvey C, Reid JA, Piquero NL. Staying home, staying safe? A short-term analysis of COVID-19 on Dallas domestic violence. Am J Crim Justice. 2020 Jun 14;:1–35. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09531-7. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32837161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2753–2755. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.077. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32402499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tessler H, Choi M, Kao G. The anxiety of being Asian American: hate crimes and negative biases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Crim Justice. 2020 Jun 10;:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09541-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32837158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Crockett D, Grier SA. Race in the marketplace and COVID-19. J Public Policy Marketing. 2020 May 28;40(1):89–91. doi: 10.1177/0743915620931448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hu J, Wang M, Lu F. COVID-19 and Asian American Pacific Islanders. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2763–2764. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05953-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32533432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Chen HA, Trinh J, Yang GP. Anti-Asian sentiment in the United States - COVID-19 and history. Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):556–557. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.05.020. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32425201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Torkamaan H, Ziegler J. Rating-based preference elicitation for recommendation of stress intervention. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization; UMAP '19; June 2019; Larnaca, Cyprus. 2019. pp. 46–50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ziems C, He B, Soni S, Kumar S. Racism is a virus: anti-Asian hate and counterhate in social media during the COVID-19 crisis. arXiv. Preprint posted online May 25, 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12423. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Singh RP, Javaid M, Kataria R, Tyagi M, Haleem A, Suman R. Significant applications of virtual reality for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):661–664. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.011. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32438329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ha SW, Kim J. Designing a scalable, accessible, and effective mobile app based solution for common mental health problems. Int J Human–Computer Interaction. 2020 Apr 26;36(14):1354–1367. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1750792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Torous J, Keshavan M. COVID-19, mobile health and serious mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2020 Apr;218:36–37. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.013. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32327314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Ellahham S. Artificial intelligence: the future for diabetes care. Am J Med. 2020 Aug;133(8):895–900. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Bachtiger P, Plymen CM, Pabari PA, Howard JP, Whinnett ZI, Opoku F, Janering S, Faisal AA, Francis DP, Peters NS. Artificial intelligence, data sensors and interconnectivity: future opportunities for heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2020 Mar;6:e11. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.14. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32514380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Hoffman DA. Increasing access to care: telehealth during COVID-19. J Law Biosci. 2020;7(1):lsaa043. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa043. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32843985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kim H, Seo K. Smartphone-based health program for improving physical activity and tackling obesity for young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010015. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph17010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ali MY, Bhatti R. COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic: information sources channels for the public health awareness. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 May;32(4):168–169. doi: 10.1177/1010539520927261. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1010539520927261?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ashrafi-Rizi H, Kazempour Z. Information typology in coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis; a commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1):e19. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32185370. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Coronavirus (COVID-19) Information Center. Facebook. [2020-07-13]. https://www.facebook.com/coronavirus_info.
- 124.COVID-19 information and resources. Google. [2020-07-13]. https://www.google.com/covid19/
- 125.Clark PY, Joseph DM, Humphreys J. Cultural, psychological, and spiritual dimensions of palliative care in humanitarian crises. In: Waldman E, Glass M, editors. A Field Manual for Palliative Care in Humanitarian Crises. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2019. pp. 1–160. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Top 130 negative themes and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence (larger size of the gray oval represents more dominance).
Sample negative themes.
Top 130 positive themes and their dominance in terms of frequency of occurrence (larger size of the gray oval represents more dominance).
Sample positive themes.