Abstract
Multicomponent coordination-driven self-assembly has proved to be a convenient approach to prepare advanced supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs), especially for those with three-dimensional structures. Herein, we report the preparation of three tetragonal prismatic cages via the self-assembly of Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2, three different linear dipyridyl ligands and porphyrin-based sodium benzoate ligands. Due to the efficient charge separation in the coordination process of Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 with pyridine and carboxylic acid and the directionality of metal-coordination bonds, these cages were prepared in high isolated yields (more than 90%). The absorption and emission properties as well as the singlet oxygen quantum yields of these cages were also studied, showing their potential applications as contrast agents for bio-imaging and photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy.
Keywords: Cage molecules, metal-coordination interactions, multicomponent self-assembly, porphyrin, photophysical properties
1. Introduction
Three-dimensional cage molecules have received much attention during the last two decades not only due to their appealing structures but also because they can provide cavities for molecular encapsulation, sensing and catalysis.[1] Additional functionalities such as luminescence,[2] electrochemical[3] and liquid crystalline[4] properties can also be incorporated into these cages through the introduction of ligands with the desired properties. Covalent cage molecules normally call for tedious and time-consuming synthesis and purification, while the preparation of cages via non-covalent self-assembly offers an alternative approach to reduce the synthetic steps and provides diverse supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs) with interesting functionalities.[5] Particularly in this filed, metal-coordination-driven self-assembly[6] plays an important role to prepare cage molecules because its high directionality gives an efficient pathway to control the orientation and geometry for the structures, making it easy to predict the formation of the final constructs. For example, Fujita’s group has prepared a series of MnL2n polyhedral via the self-assembly of tetra-coordinated palladium salts and bent dipyridyl units.[7] Nitschke and coworkers reported the formation of tetrahedral cages via multicomponent self-assembly of metal ions (Fe(II), Zn(II), etc), 2-formylpyridine derivatives and diamine or triamine moieties.[8] Stang et. al. showed that emissive tetragonal prismatic cages could be prepared efficiently via the self-assembly of tetraphenylethene derivatives, Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 and dipyridyl or dicarboxylic acid units.[9]
Porphyrins and their derivatives are an important class of molecules, which have been widely used in natural systems such as photosynthesis[10] and hemoglobin,[11] as well as in artificial systems such as photodynamic therapy,[12] molecular electronics[13] and biomimetic catalysis.[14] They can also serve as building blocks for advanced SCCs[15] based on their highly symmetric structures and coordinated properties towards metal ions. In 2014, Stang and coworkers reported the preparation of tetragonal prismatic cages based on tetrapyridyl porphyrin as the faces,[16] indicating that the solubilities of these cages were increased compared with free porphyrins. Herein, we further explore the multicomponent self-assembly and prepare three tetragonal prismatic metallacages based on sodium benzoatedecorated porphyrin units. The absorption and emission of these cages in six common organic solvents were studied in detail. All the cages feature a strong absorption band centered at ca. 420 nm, corresponding to their Soret bands. Four Q bands were also observed ranging from 500 to 700 nm. Different from the tetrapyridyl porphyrin-based cages, these cages show two strong emission bands with similar intensities centered at ca. 650 nm and 720 nm, indicating that they can emit in the NIR region, which are of vital importance for bioimaging applications. More importantly, these cages exhibit good singlet oxygen quantum yields (ΦΔ), showing their potential use as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy towards cancer treatment.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Cage Preparation and Characterization
The cages were prepared in high isolated yields using a procedure reported in literature with minor modifications.[9b] Sodium benzoate-decorated porphyrin 1, Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 2 and dipyridyl ligands 3 were mixed in 1:4:2 molar ratio and heated in acetone/water (v/v, 4:1) at 50°C for 12 h. After cooling, the solvent was removed and the residue was redissolved in acetone. The mixture was filtered to remove the formed byproducts and then ether or ethyl acetate (5 equiv. compared to acetone) was added to the clear acetone solution to give precipitates, which were further collected by centrifugation. The precipitation process was repeated for three times to afford cages 4a–4c (Scheme 1) in reasonably good yields and purities. It is worth mentioning that due to the use of sodium benzoate-decorated porphyrin which can be dissolved well in water, the solubility of the reactance is increased compared with using tetrapyridyl porphyrin as the faces, which will benefit the coordination process to give high yields for the cages.
Scheme 1.
Cartoon representations of the self-assembly of metallacages 4a, 4b and 4c.
The structure of cages 4a–4c was first examined by multinuclear NMR (31P{1H} NMR and 1H NMR), electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass (ESI-TOF-MS). It can be seen from the 31P{1H} NMR spectra (Figure 1) that all the cages exhibit upfield chemical shift changes compared with Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 2 and split into two doublets of equal intensity with concomitant 195Pt satellites because of the different coordination environments of Pt(II) with pyridyl and carboxylic units. Peaks were found at 5.90 and 0.13 ppm for 4a, 5.25 and 0.30 ppm for 4b, 5.68 and 0.40 ppm for 4c, respectively. Proton NMR spectra gave more insights into the coordination interactions and revealed the purities of these metallacages. The pyridyl (α-pyridyl and β-pyridyl) protons shifted downfield, which is a characteristic feature for the formation of Pt(II)-pyridine coordination bonds.[9a,b] For metallacage 4a, α-pyridyl protons H1 shifted from 8.75 ppm to 9.32 ppm and β-pyridyl protons H2 shifted from 7.78 ppm to 8.46 ppm (Figure 1, spectra a and b). Similar trends were also observed for metallacages 4b and 4c. Protons H3, H4 and H5 of metallacage 4b shifted from 8.61 ppm, 7.60 ppm and 7.54 ppm to 9.07 ppm, 8.08 ppm and 7.96 ppm, respectively (Figure 1, spectra c and d). Protons H6 and H7 of metallacage 4c shifted from 8.69 ppm and 7.55 ppm to 9.24 ppm and 8.06 ppm, respectively (Figure 2, spectra e and f). Benzyl protons Ha and Hb shifted upfield and pyrrolyl protons Hc split into two set of peaks, as compared to tetracarboxyphenylporphyrin. The methylene and methyl protons split into two set of signals. Overall, all the chemical shifts changes agree well with previous reported results,[9b] indicating the formation of discrete, highly symmetric tetragonal prismatic metallacages.
Figure 1.
Partial 31P{1H} NMR spectra (121.4 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K) of2 (a), 4a (b), 4b (c) and 4c (d).
Figure 2.
Partial 1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K) of 3a (a), 4a (b), 3b (c), 4b (d), 3c (e) and 4c (f). The residual ether or ethyl acetate peaks are marked with asterisks.
ESI-TOF-MS characterization is a widely used method to determine the stoichiometry of the metallacages. In the ESI-TOF-MS spectra of metallacages 4a–4c (Figure 3), three intense peaks with charge states from 3+ to 5+ were assigned, which confirms the formation of tetragonal prismatic metallacages. Isotopically well resolved peaks at m/Z=2130.3379, 1587.6704 and 1585.6301 were found for 4a, 4b and 4c, corresponding to [4a – 3OTf]3+, [4b – 4OTf]4+ and [4c – 4OTf]4+, respectively. These peaks are in good agreement with their calculated theoretical distributions, which supports the composition of metallacages 4a–4c.
Figure 3.
ESI-TOF-MS spectra of metallacages 4a (a), 4b (b) and 4c(c).
2.2. Photophysical Studies
The absorption and emission spectra of metallacages 4a–4c were collected in six commonly used solvents, including DMSO, DMF, acetonitrile, acetone, methanol and dichloromethane due to their good solubility in these solvents. The absorption spectra of these cages are similar in different solvents, showing a strong Soret peak centered at ca. 420 nm and four Q bands centered at ca. 650 nm (Q1), 590 nm (Q2), 550 nm (Q3) and 515 nm (Q4), respectively (Figure 4, spectra a, c and e), which are similar with the absorption for porphyrin derivatives.[16] The Soret absorption is attributed to the S0 to S2 transition while the Q bands are the transitions from S0 to S1 state.
Figure 4.
The UV/Vis absorption (a, c, e) and emission (b, d, f) spectra of metallacages 4a (a, b), 4b (c, d) and 4c (e, f) in different solvents (λex = 365 nm, c = 10.0 μM).
Two intense emission bands centered at ca. 650 nm [Q(0, 0)] and 720 nm [Q(0,1)] with similar intensities were found from the emission spectra of metallacages 4a–4c, no variation in polar (DMSO, DMF, acetonitrile and methanol) or less polar solvents (acetone and dichloromethane), corresponding to the emission from the S1 singlet state. It is worth noting that the formation of metallacage structure increases the emission intensity at ca. 720 nm compared with that located at ca. 650 nm, indicating that the formation of metal-coordination bonds strongly influences the emission properties of the metallacages. This brings the emission bands of these cages into the NIR region, making them serve as potential contrast agents for bio-imaging.
It is well known that porphyrin derivatives would generate singlet oxygen (1O2) upon light irradiation, which makes them widely used as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy.[12] The singlet oxygen quantum yields (ΦΔ) of metallacages 4a–4c were measured using 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) as 1O2 scavenger and 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP) as reference (ΦΔ=0.64).[17] Time dependent absorbance spectroscopy of DPBF was collected in the presence of different metallacages upon light irradiation (Figure 5). Continuous decrease of the absorption band centered at 420 nm was observed for all the metallacages, suggesting that 1O2 which induces the decomposition of DPBF was gradually generated upon light irradiation. The ΦΔ values of metallacages 4a, 4b and 4c were calculated to be 0.73, 0.62 and 0.73 in DMSO, respectively. The ΦΔ values of metallacages 4a and 4c are even higher than that of TPP because the Pt(II) would promote intersystem crossing,[18] benefiting better 1O2 generation efficiency for metallacages. Considering the potential anticancer activity of Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2,[19] these metallacages could be potentially used as cancer theranostic agents including bio-imaging, chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy.
Figure 5.
Time dependent UV/Vis absorption of the mixture of DPBF with 4a (a), 4b (b), 4c (c) and TPP (d) in DMSO upon light irradiation (λex = 365 nm). The concentration was 20 μM for DPBF and 2 μM for metallacages 4a–4c and TPP.
3. Summary
In summary, based on the self-assembly of a benzoate porphyrin derivative, Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 and dipyridyl ligands, three tetragonal prismatic metallacages were efficiently prepared. These metallacages were well characterized by 31P{1H} NMR, 1H NMR as well as ESI-TOF-MS and the photophysical studies reveal that they exhibit emission in the NIR region and good singlet oxygen quantum yields. This study not only offers a general method for the preparation of porphyrin-based tetragonal prismatic cages by the variation of dipyridyl units but also provides a type of potential candidates towards cancer photochemotherapy.
4. Experimental Section
All reagents were purchased from commercially available suppliers and used without further purification. Compound 3c was prepared according to a procedure reported in literature.[20] NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity 300 MHz or Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer. 1H NMR chemical shifts are reported relative to residual solvent signals, and 31P{1H} NMR chemical shifts are referenced to an external unlocked sample of 85% H3PO4 (δ = 0.0). Mass spectra were carried out on Bruker AutoFlex TOF/TOF mass spectrometer. The UV-vis experiments were conducted on a DH-2000-BAL scan spectrophotometer. The fluorescent experiments were conducted on an FLS920 fluorescence spectrophotometer.
General Procedure for Metallacages
Compound 1 (2.20 mg, 2.50 μmol), 2 (7.30 mg, 10.0 μmol) and 3 (0.78 mg for 3a, 0.91 mg for 3b, 0.90 mg for 3c, 5.00 μmol) were mixed in a 1 : 4 : 2 molar ratio and dissolved in acetone/water (5.0 mL, 4:1, v/v). The whole reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 12 h and then cooled down. The solvent was removed by nitrogen flow. The residue was redissolved in acetone (1.0 mL), filtered and then ether (for 4a and 4b) or ethyl acetate (for 4c) (5.0 mL) was added to the clear acetone solution to give precipitates which were collected by centrifugation. The precipitation process was repeated for three times to obtain metallacages 4a–4c as red powders.
Cage 4a (8.13 mg, 95%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K): 9.32 (d, J= 6.4 Hz, 16H), 8.46 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 16H), 8.14 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 16H), 8.01 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 16H), 7.87 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 8H), 7.34 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 8H), 2.07–2.40 (m, 96H), 1.40–1.61 (m, 144H). 31P{1H} NMR (121.4 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K) δ (ppm): 5.25 ppm (d,2JP-P=21.3 Hz, 195Pt satellites, 1JPt-P=3302 Hz), 0.30 ppm (d, 2JP-P=21.3 Hz, 1JPt-P = 3302 Hz).
Cage 4b (7.85 mg, 90%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K ): 9.11 (s, 8H), 9.07 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 16H), 8.16 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 16H), 8.08 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 16H), 8.05 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 16H), 7.96 (s, 8H), 2.08–2.38 (m, 96H), 1.38–1.51 (m, 144 H). 31P NMR (121.4 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K) δ (ppm) : 6.18 ppm (d, 2JP-P=20.7 Hz, 195Pt satellites, 1JPt-P=3355 Hz, 1.22 ppm (d, 2JP-P=20.7 Hz, 195Pt satellites, 1JPt-P=3355 Hz).
Cage 4c (7.98 mg, 92%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K): 9.24 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 16H), 9.12 (s, 8H), 8.18 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 16H), 8.10 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 16 H), 8.06 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 16 H), 7.93 (s, 8H), 1.95–2.41 (m, 96H), 1.30–1.57 (m, 144 H). 31P NMR (121.4 MHz, CD3COCD3, 295 K) δ (ppm): 5.68 (d, 2JP-P=21.2 Hz, 195Pt satellites, 1JPt-P=3354 Hz), 0.40 (d, 2JP-P=21.2 Hz, 195Pt satellites, 1JPt-P=3354 Hz).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21801203 to M. Z.), National Science Foundation (CHE-1506722 to X. L.), National Institutes of Health (1R01GM128037-01 to X. L.). M. Z. is thankful for start-up funds from Xi’an Jiaotong University. We thank Dr. Gang Chang and Yu Wang at Instrument Analysis Center and Ms Zheng at Experimental Chemistry Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University for measurements.
References
- [1] a).Holst JR, Trewin A, Cooper AI, Nat. Chem 2010, 2, 915–920; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cohen Y, Avram L, Isr. J. Chem 2011, 51, 698–699; [Google Scholar]; c) Chakrabarty R, Mukherjee PS, Stang PJ, Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 6810–6918; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Harris K, Fujita D, Fujita M, Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 6703–6712; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Durot S, Taesch J, Heitz V, Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 8542–8578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) He YP, Yuan LB, Chen GH, Lin QP, Wang F, Zhang L, Zhang J, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 16845–16851; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Zhang M, Xu H, Wang M, Saha ML, Zhou Z, Yan X, Wang H, Li X, Huang F, She N, Stang PJ, Inorg. Chem 2017, 56, 12498–12504; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Zhang Q, Catti L, Tiefenbacher K, Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 2107–2114; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Mastalerz M, Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 2411–2422; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Beuerle F, Gole B, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 4850–4878; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2018, 130, 4942–4972; [Google Scholar]; k) Liu Y, Shi B, Wang H, Shangguan L, Li Z, Zhang M, Huang F, Macromol. Rapid Commun 2018, e1800655; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Mondal B, Mukherjee PS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 12592–12601; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) He Y-P, Yuan L-B, Song J-S, Chen G-H, Lin Q, Li C, Zhang L, Zhang J, Chem. Mater 2018, 30, 7769–7775. [Google Scholar]
- [2] a).Zhao J, Yang D, Zhao Y, Yang X-J, Wang Y-Y, Wu B, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 6632–6636; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2014, 126, 6750–6754; [Google Scholar]; b) Shanmugaraju S, Mukherjee PS, Chem. Eur. J 2015, 21, 6656–6666; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Xiong J-B, Feng H-T, Sun J-P, Xie W-Z, Yang D, Liu M, Zheng Y-S, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 11469–11472; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Li XZ, Zhou LP, Yan LL, Yuan DQ, Lin CS, Sun QF, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 8237–8244; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Qu H, Wang Y, Li Z, Wang X, Fang H, Tian Z, Cao X, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 18142–18145; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Zhang M, Yin S, Zhang J, Zhou Z, Saha ML, Lu C, Stang PJ, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3044–3049; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Cui S, Zhuang G, Lu D, Huang Q, Jia H, Wang Y, Yang S, Du P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 9330–9335; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2018, 130, 9474–9479; [Google Scholar]; h) Zhang T, Zhang GL, Yan QQ, Zhou LP, Cai LX, Guo XQ, Sun QF, Inorg. Chem 2018, 57, 3596–3601; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Feng HT, Yuan YX, Xiong JB, Zheng YS, Tang BZ, Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 7452–7476; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Yin GQ, Wang H, Wang XQ, Song B, Chen LJ, Wang L, Hao XQ, Yang HB, Li X, Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3] a).Croue V, Goeb S, Szaloki G, Allain M, Salle M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 1746–1750; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2016, 128, 1778–1782; [Google Scholar]; b) Yazaki K, Noda S, Tanaka Y, Sei Y, Akita M, Yoshizawa M, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 15031–15034; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2016, 128, 15255–15258; [Google Scholar]; c) Jing X, Yang Y, He C, Chang Z, Reek JNH, Duan C, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 11759–11763; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2017, 129, 11921–11925; [Google Scholar]; d) Cai LX, Li SC, Yan DN, Zhou LP, Guo F, Sun QF, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 4869–4876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4] a).Yu G, Ye Y, Tong Z, Yang J, Li Z, Hua B, Shao L, Li S, Macromol. Rapid Commun 2016, 37, 1540–1547; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Uchida J, Yoshio M, Sato S, Yokoyama H, Fujita M, Kato T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 14085–14089; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2017, 129, 14273–14277. [Google Scholar]
- [5] a).Cook TR, Zheng Y-R, Stang PJ, Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 734–777; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Brown CJ, Toste FD, Bergman RG, Raymond KN, Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 3012–3035; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Cook TR, Stang PJ, Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 7001–7045; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Clever GH, Punt P, Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 2233–2243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Chakraborty S, Newkome GR, Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 3991–4016; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wu GY, Chen LJ, Xu L, Zhao XL, Yang HB, Coord. Chem. Rev 2018, 369, 39–75. [Google Scholar]
- [6] a).Pinalli R, Boccini F, Dalcanale E, Isr. J. Chem 2011, 51, 781–797; [Google Scholar]; b) Han YF, Jin GX, Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43, 2799–2823; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sinha N, Tan TTY, Peris E, Hahn FE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 7393–7397; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2017, 129, 7499–7503; [Google Scholar]; d) Chen LJ, Yang HB, Shionoya M, Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 2555–2576; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Gan MM, Liu JQ, Zhang L, Wang YY, Hahn FE, Han YF, Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 9587–9641; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Lu Y, Zhang HN, Jin GX, Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 2148–2158; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Liu D, Chen M, Li Y, Shen Y, Huang J, Yang X, Jiang Z, Li X, Newkome GR, Wang P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 14116–14120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7] a).Inokuma Y, Kawano M, Fujita M, Nat. Chem 2011, 3, 349–358; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Fujita D, Ueda Y, Sato S, Mizuno N, Kumasaka T, Fujita M, Nature 2016, 540, 563–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8] a).Castilla AM, Ramsay WJ, Nitschke JR, Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 2063–2073; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang D, Ronson TK, Nitschke JR, Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 2423–2436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9] a).Yan X, Cook TR, Wang P, Huang F, Stang PJ, Nat. Chem 2015, 7, 342–348; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Saha ML, Yan X, Stang PJ, Acc. Chem. Res 2016, 49, 2527–2539; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang M, Saha ML, Stang PJ, Struct. Chem 2016, 28, 453–459; [Google Scholar]; d) Zhang M, Saha ML, Wang M, Zhou Z, Song B, Lu C, Yan X, Li X, Huang F, Yin S, Stang PJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5067–5074; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Lu C, Zhang M, Tang D, Yan X, Zhang Z, Zhou Z, Song B, Wang H, Li X, Yin S, Sepehrpour H, Stang PJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 7674–7680; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Sun Y, Yao Y, Wang H, Fu W, Chen C, Saha ML, Zhang M, Datta S, Zhou Z, Yu H, Li X, Stang PJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 12819–12828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10] a).Gust D, Moore TA, Moore AL, Acc. Chem. Res 2009, 42, 1890–1898; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bottari G, Trukhina O, Ince M, Torres T, Coord. Chem. Rev 2012, 256, 2453–2477. [Google Scholar]
- [11] a).Scheidt WR, Reed CA, Chem. Rev 1981, 81, 543–555; [Google Scholar]; b) Collman JP, Fu L, Acc. Chem. Res 1999, 32, 455–463. [Google Scholar]
- [12] a).Sternberg ED, Dolphin D, Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4151–4202; [Google Scholar]; b) Rajora MA, Lou JWH, Zheng G, Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 6433–6469; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou J, Zhang Y, Yu G, Crawley MR, Fulong CRP, Friedman AE, Sengupta S, Sun J, Li Q, Huang F, Cook TR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 7730–7736; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yu G, Yu S, Saha ML, Zhou J, Cook TR, Yung BC, Chen J, Mao Z, Zhang F, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Shao L, Wang S, Gao C, Huang F, Stang PJ, Chen X, Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 4335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13] a).Limburg B, Thomas JO, Holloway G, Sadeghi H, Sangtarash S, Hou ICY, Cremers J, Narita A, Mullen K, Lambert CJ, Briggs GAD, Mol JA, Anderson HL, Adv. Funct. Mater 2018, 28, 1803629; [Google Scholar]; b) Bols PS, Anderson HL, Acc. Chem. Res 2018, 51, 2083–2092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14] a).Zhao M, Ou S, Wu C-D, Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 1199–1207; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Oldacre AN, Friedman AE, Cook TR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 1424–1427; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Shalit H, Libman A, Pappo D, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 13404–13413; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Chen LJ, Chen S, Qin Y, Xu L, Yin GQ, Zhu JL, Zhu FF, Zheng W, Li X, Yang HB, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 5049–5052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15] a).Zheng Y-R, Zhao Z, Wang M, Ghosh K, Pollock JB, Cook TR, Stang PJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 16873–16882; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Durot S, Taesch J, Heitz V, Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 8542–8578; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Garcia-Simon C, Costas M, Ribas X, Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 40–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Shi Y, Sanchez-Molina I, Cao C, Cook TR, Stang PJ, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014,111, 9390–9395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17] a).Bonnett R, McGarvey DJ, Harriman A, Land EJ, Truscott TG, Winfield U–J, Photochem. Photobiol 1988, 48, 271–176; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Meng S, Xu Z, Hong G, Zhao L, Zhao Z, Guo J, Ji H, Liu T, Eur. J. Med. Chem 2015, 92, 35–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Zhang Y, Fulong CR, Hauke CE, Crawley MR, Friedman AE, Cook TR, Chem. Eur. J 2017, 23, 4532–4536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19] a).Zhang M, Li S, Yan X, Zhou Z, Saha ML, Wang YC, Stang PJ, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11100–11105; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yu G, Cook TR, Li Y, Yan X, Wu D, Shao L, Shen J, Tang G, Huang F, Chen X, Stang PJ, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 13720–13725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lasanyi D, Meszaros A, Novak Z, Tolnai GL, J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 8281–8291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






