Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide. Neovascularization is closely related to the malignancy of tumors. We constructed a signature of angiogenesis-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC. The lncRNA expression matrix of 424 HCC patients was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). First, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to distinguish the differentially expressed genes of the angiogenesis genes in liver cancer and adjacent tissues. Next, a signature of angiogenesis-related lncRNAs was constructed using univariate and multivariate analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the accuracy. The signature and relevant clinical information were used to construct the nomogram. A 5-lncRNA signature was highly correlated with overall survival (OS) in HCC patients and performed well in evaluations using the C-index, areas under the curve, and calibration curves. In summary, the 5-lncRNA model can serve as an accurate signature to predict the prognosis of patients with liver cancer, but its mechanism of action must be further elucidated by experiments.
Keywords: angiogenesis, GSEA, mRNA signature
Introduction
Liver cancer is considered one of the most common cancers worldwide [1], and HCC is the most common cause of liver cancer [2]. Despite advances in surgical and ablative therapies, the high recurrence and metastasis of liver cancer remain the leading causes of all cancer deaths [3,4]. Additionally, an increase in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome and obesity increases the risk of liver cancer [5]. Therefore, identifying new predictors to improve the prognosis of HCC is urgent.
Tumor angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the occurrence and development of HCC; thus, tumor blood vessels are one of the key targets of tumor therapy management [6]. Because of the high proliferation of tumors, tumors must induce massive angiogenesis to meet their needs [7]. Neovascularization shows immaturity and high heterogeneity [6], leading to decreased immune cell infiltration and activity and an increased risk of metastatic disease [8,9]. Thus, it is critical to identify angiogenesis-related biomarkers that serve as valuable early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HCC patients.
Long noncoding RNAs are noncoding RNAs with a length greater than 200 nt that play a critical role in regulating cell differentiation, growth and development [10]. In recent years, increasing evidence has shown that lncRNAs are related to various cancers [11]. Additionally, lncRNAs are closely related to tumor occurrence, metastasis and tumor stage [12–14]. For example, HOTAIR, as a carcinogenic lncRNA, is highly expressed in breast cancer, gallbladder cancer and other cancers, is associated with invasion and metastasis and is a diagnostic and prognostic indicator for various cancers [15–19]. However, studies on the characteristics of angiogenesis-related lncRNAs during HCC survival are still lacking.
In the present study, we developed and verified an angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature to predict the OS of patients with HCC for the first time. Additionally, we further explored the relationship between the five lncRNAs and HCC progression. A nomogram based on five lncRNA characteristics and clinical factors was then used to assess clinical significance. GSEA was used to identify potential biological processes and molecular mechanisms, such as apoptosis, autophagy and the cell cycle. Finally, we analyzed the relationship between the model and immune cells. In summary, we found that the lncRNA signature not only serves as independent prognostic factor for HCC but also has better predictive ability for HCC patient survival than existing lncRNA-related signatures.
Materials and methods
Data collection
The lncRNA expression data and clinical information were downloaded from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and were randomly divided into a training set and verification set at a 3:1 ratio. Detailed information is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Summary of baseline clinical pathological parameters of patients with HCC in the two datasets.
Characteristic | Train | Test |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | ||
≤65 | 165 | 59 |
>65 | 87 | 32 |
Gender | ||
Male | 170 | 64 |
Female | 82 | 27 |
Grade | ||
1 | 31 | 14 |
2 | 126 | 42 |
3 | 87 | 31 |
4 | 8 | 4 |
Stage | ||
I | 122 | 47 |
II | 65 | 44 |
III | 60 | N/A |
IV | 5 | N/A |
T stage | ||
T1 | 123 | 48 |
T2 | 67 | 19 |
T3 | 57 | 19 |
T4 | 5 | 5 |
Survival status | ||
Alive | 172 | 60 |
Deceased | 80 | 31 |
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; N/A, not applicable.
Angiogenesis-related lncRNAs
GSEA was used to identify angiogenesis-related gene sets (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/search.jsp) in 50 HCC tissues and their adjacent tissues. Finally, 123 genes related to angiogenesis were included in subsequent studies. The relationship between lncRNAs and angiogenesis genes was calculated based on their expression value. LncRNAs were selected for subsequent study based on a Spearman’s correlation coefficient absolute value >0.3 and P<0.01.
Development of an angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature
In the training set, we first identified 864 angiogenesis-related lncRNAs. Univariate Cox regression analysis (P<0.05) was used to obtain 123 lncRNAs associated with prognosis. Finally, multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to construct a signature containing five lncRNAs, as detailed in Table 2. The risk score for each patient was calculated using the following equation:
where Coef (i) and x(i) represent the estimated regression coefficient and value of each lncRNA expression, respectively. All the patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and two-sided log-rank tests were used to compare the OS of different patients. ROC curves were applied to assess the diagnostic efficacy of each clinicopathological characteristic and prognostic signature. Stratified survival analysis was performed to examine the accuracy of the prognostic signature in predicting patient survival outcomes. Furthermore, we performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate whether the risk score was independent in determining the prognosis of HCC patients. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Table 2. The information of five lncRNAs associated with overall survival in patients with HCC.
LncRNA | Coef | HR | P-value | Risk |
---|---|---|---|---|
LINC01138 | 0.301906 | 1.35243 | P=0.001 | High |
LINC00942 | 0.028688 | 1.02910 | P<0.001 | High |
AL031985.3 | 0.350479 | 1.41974 | P<0.001 | High |
AC015908.3 | -0.155085 | 0.85634 | P=0.004 | Low |
USP46-AS1 | 0.370322 | 1.44820 | P=0.002 | High |
Abbreviation: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
The lncRNA expression profile matrix of HCC patients from the verification set was used as independent validation for the accuracy of the 5-lncRNA constructed model.
Establishment and validation of the nomogram
We constructed a nomogram by integrating traditional clinical variables such as age, stage and the risk score derived from the prognostic signature to analyze the probable 3- and 5-year OS of patients with HCC. We then used the concordance index (C-index) to evaluate the discriminative and predictive ability of the nomogram. Furthermore, calibration curves of the nomogram were generated to examine the concordance between the predicted survival and observed survival after bias correction.
Construction of the lncRNA–mRNA coexpression network
A coexpression network was constructed to analyze the correlation between angiogenesis-related lncRNAs and their target mRNAs. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to identify the mRNAs that were significantly associated with their target lncRNAs based on an absolute threshold coefficient value > 0.3.
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
GSEA was used to identify angiogenesis-related gene sets in 50 HCC tissues and their adjacent tissues. GSEA was also used to further analyze the underlying molecular mechanisms. The gene sets were filtered using the maximum and minimum gene set sizes of 500 and 15 genes, respectively. The enriched gene sets were obtained based on a P value < 0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 after performing 1000 permutations.
Statistical analysis
The data were processed using the PERL programming language (http://www.perl.org/; Version 5.30.2). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software or R software in a double-blind manner. P<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results
Identification of angiogenesis-related genes
GSEA was used to determine significant differences in the angiogenesis-related gene set between HCC and paired adjacent samples. The angiogenesis-related gene set was significantly enriched in HCC samples (Figure 1A–C). In total, 123 angiogenesis-related genes were used in the subsequent study (Supplementary File S1). The heat map shows differences in the expression of angiogenesis-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and adjacent tissues (Figure 1D).
Identification of angiogenesis-related long noncoding RNAs
From GSEA, we collected 123 angiogenesis-related genes. Next, 864 angiogenesis-related lncRNAs were identified. Subsequently, five angiogenesis-associated lncRNAs, LINC01138, LINC00942, AL031985.3, AC015908.3 and USP46-AS1, were analyzed in the training set using univariate Cox regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier (KM) inspection and multivariate Cox regression analysis (Table 2).
Construction and validation of a signature
We combined these five angiogenesis-related lncRNAs to generate a signature to predict the clinical characteristics of HCC. The risk scores of each HCC case indicated that the patients in the high-risk group generally had a worse prognosis in the training set and testing cohort (Figure 2A,B). Additionally, the log-rank test and Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis showed that patients with a low risk score had a much longer survival than those with a high risk score in the two cohorts (Figure 2C). The time-dependent ROC curves were analyzed to further assess the accuracy of the 5-angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature in predicting the survival of HCC patients at 3 and 5 years (Figure 2D). The time-dependent ROC curve showed that the AUC at 3 and 5 years were more than 0.682 in the training set and the validation cohort, respectively, indicating the signature had an excellent capacity to predict HCC patient survival. Next, we performed KM analysis for each lncRNA in the model. When five lncRNAs were used as a single biomarker, their diagnostic significance was significantly lower than that of ten angiogenesis-related lncRNAs, further indicating the accuracy of our signature (Supplementary File S2).
Our signature correlates with disease progression
In the training cohort, we assessed the relationship between the signature and HCC clinicopathological characteristics (Figure 3A–F). The result reveals that our signature was significantly associated with grade, stage and vascular invasion, suggesting that our signature plays a crucial role in HCC progression.
The signature acts as an independent prognostic indicator
Cox regression analysis was used to determine whether the 5-angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature was an independent prognostic factor for HCC. Age, sex, grade, stage and T stage were included as clinical factors (Figure 4A,B). Univariate analysis revealed that stage, T stage and the risk score were associated with survival in the training set, and T stage and risk score were associated with survival in the validation cohort. Additionally, multivariate Cox analysis showed that T stage and the risk score were associated with survival in the training set, and the risk score was associated with survival in the validation cohort. Thus, our signature could be an independent prognostic factor in HCC. The AUC values in the training and validation sets were 0.766 and 0.869, respectively, indicating high accuracy of the risk score as an independent prognostic factor (Figure 4C).
Stratified analysis was conducted according to age, sex, stage and T stage. Our risk stratification based on the angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature remains a powerful tool for predicting HCC survival by age, sex, tumor stage and T stage (Figure 5A–H).
A nomogram based on the signature
To provide clinicians with a practical clinical tool for predicting the 3- and 5-year OS incidence in patients with HCC, we constructed a nomogram based on the clinicopathological characteristics (age, sex, grade and stage) and risk score (Figure 6A). The 3- and 5-year OS calibration curves showed that the proposed nomogram had good predictive ability (Figure 6B,C).
Analysis of biological processes associated with angiogenesis-related LncRNAs
We investigated the potential functions of the five angiogenesis-related lncRNAs in HCC by constructing an lncRNA–mRNA coexpression network using Cytoscape. The lncRNA–mRNA coexpression network contained 27 pairs of lncRNA–mRNA (Pearson’s correlation coefficient |R| > 0.3 and P<0.05) (Figure 7A). Among these, 27 mRNAs were significantly correlated with the 5 lncRNAs in the prognostic signature. The Sankey diagram shows the relationship between the 27 mRNAs and 5 lncRNAs (risk/protective) (Figure 7B). The relationship between the lncRNA expression level and risk value and clinical factors are shown in Figure 7C. We conducted GSEA between the high-risk and low-risk groups to reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms of the angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature involved in HCC progression. KEGG analysis showed that apoptosis, the cell cycle and the regulation of autophagy in the high-risk group were the most significantly enriched pathways (Figure 7D). Additionally, the angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature regulated glucose metabolism, glycolysis, the P53 pathway and TGF-B signaling, showing that the signature was involved in important bioregulation (Figure 7E,F).
Association between the angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature and immune cells
Gene Ontology(GO) analysis enrichment analysis was used to further verify whether the signature was involved in immune response. As shown in Figure 8A,B, the most notable correlation in GO is related to immune response. Additionally, the signature was related to CD4-T cells, dendrites, macrophages and neutrophils but was independent of B cells and CD8-T cells. The correlation between macrophages was the highest, indicating an increased number of macrophages in the high-risk samples (Figure 8C–H). The above results suggest that our signature is associated with immune infiltration.
Discussion
HCC is the second leading cause of cancer-related death globally, with approximately half of all cases and deaths occurring in China [20]. The high probability of metastasis and recurrence limits long-term survival [21]. Hyperproliferation of blood vessels and vascular abnormalities are common in liver cancer [22]. There is increasing evidence that angiogenesis is closely related to the malignancy of liver cancer [23]. Chen found that CPAP promotes angiogenesis and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma [24]. In pancreatic cancer, angiogenesis is an essential factor for tumor progression [25]. VEGF and VEGFRs, the most important and well-studied modulators of angiogenesis in recent years [26], play a crucial role in liver cancer [23]. In recent years, antiangiogenic therapy has been widely used in liver cancer treatment. As an antiangiogenic drug, sorafenib is used in the treatment of nonresectable or metastatic liver cancer. However, sorafenib only prolonged the average survival rate of HCC patients by 3 months because some patients exhibited sorafenib resistance [27–29]. Therefore, angiogenesis-related biomarkers are potential diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic targets for patients with HCC. In the present study, we show that 5-lncRNA signature analysis is an effective method to predict the prognosis of HCC patients independently. Additionally, patients with high angiogenesis-related risk scores had a poor prognosis. Notably, the risk score based on the 5-lncRNA signature was closely related to liver cancer development and immune cell infiltration.
Studies have found that lncRNAs play a crucial role in the malignant progression of HCC [30,31]. Additionally, lncRNAs are related to gene activation, autophagy, metabolism, inflammation, the immune response and other biological processes [32–35]. In particular, emerging evidence suggests that lncRNAs play a regulatory role in tumor angiogenesis [36]. For example, the long noncoding RNA UBE2CP3 can enhance VEGFA secretion by HCC cells and promote angiogenesis [37]. Recent studies have shown that angiogenesis-related lncRNAs may become a new therapeutic target and molecular marker for diseases, providing potential support for the clinical management and treatment of tumors [38,39]. Sun found that the 5-autophagy-related lncRNA signature accurately predicted the prognosis of BCLA patients [38]. Additionally, Luan established an autophagy-related lncRNA signature in glioma and advanced the targeted treatment of glioma [39]. Therefore, angiogenesis-related lncRNAs may become a new marker for liver cancer malignancy and a potential indicator of prognosis in patients with liver cancer.
In our study, we first identified 123 angiogenesis-related lncRNAs significantly related to OS by univariate Cox regression analysis of angiogenesis-related lncRNA expression in the samples of patients with liver cancer from the TCGA database. Additionally, five adaptive lncRNAs, LINC01138, LINC00942, AL031985.3, AC015908.3 and USP46-AS1, were selected according to the performance of multivariate Cox regression analysis to construct the prognostic signature. The risk score of each HCC patient was calculated based on the expression of five angiogenesis-related lncRNAs in the prognostic signature. Next, the patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the median risk score. HCC patients with a low risk score had a better survival time than those with a high risk score for HCC. ROC curve analysis verified the accuracy of the prognostic features of angiogenesis-related lncRNAs in HCC patients. The risk score based on the angiogenesis-related lncRNA prognostic signature was an independent prognostic factor based on variable Cox regression analysis. Stratified correlation analysis showed that the prognostic features of angiogenesis-related lncRNAs accurately predicted survival in patients with high- and low-risk HCC. Five angiogenesis-related lncRNAs in HCC were further identified for their respective regulation, and an lncRNA–mRNA coexpression network was constructed. GSEA also revealed significant differences in angiogenesis-related signaling pathways between the high- and low-risk groups. Some angiogenesis-related pathways were enriched in the high-risk groups. Finally, we found an association between the signature based on genes associated with angiogenesis and immune cell infiltration. This finding suggests that enhanced immunity is associated with improved prognosis. These results are consistent with the notion that angiogenesis is a key regulator of HCC progression.
For the first time, an angiogenesis-related lncRNA signature was identified to be correlated with HCC progression and prognosis and could be used as independent prognostic molecular biomarkers for predicting HCC survival.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- GSEA
gene set enrichment analysis
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- lncRNA
long noncoding RNA
- NAFLD
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
- OS
overall survival
- ROC
receiver operating characteristic
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
Data Availability
All the data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA, http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/search.jsp) databases.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81372481].
Author Contribution
L.D.L. and L.F. designed the research and revised the manuscript. L.D.L. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript draft. C.Y., Z.H. and H.G.L. analyzed the experimental results.
References
- 1.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D. and Jemal A. (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30 10.3322/caac.21590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang J.D., Hainaut P., Gores G.J., Amadou A., Plymoth A. and Roberts L.R. (2019) A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 589–604 10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A. and Jemal A. (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Forner A., Llovet J.M. and Bruix J. (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 379, 1245–1255 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Younossi Z., Stepanova M., Ong J.P., Jacobson I.M., Bugianesi E., Duseja A.et al. (2019) Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Is the Fastest Growing Cause of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 748.e3–755.e3 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Viallard C. and Larrivée B. (2017) Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis 20, 409–426 10.1007/s10456-017-9562-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carmeliet P. and Jain R.K. (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298–307 10.1038/nature10144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rahma O.E. and Hodi F.S. (2019) The intersection between tumor angiogenesis and immune suppression. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 5449–5457 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Catalano V., Turdo A., Di Franco S., Dieli F., Todaro M. and Stassi G. (2013) Tumor and its microenvironment: a synergistic interplay. Semin. Cancer Biol. 23, 522–532 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhan A. and Mandal S.S. (2015) LncRNA HOTAIR: a master regulator of chromatin dynamics and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1856, 151–164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhan A., Soleimani M. and Mandal S.S. (2017) Long noncoding RNA and cancer: a new paradigm. Cancer Res. 77, 3965–3981 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vitiello M., Tuccoli A. and Poliseno L. (2015) Long non-coding RNAs in cancer: implications for personalized therapy. Cell Oncol. (Dordr.) 38, 17–28 10.1007/s13402-014-0180-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bartonicek N., Maag J.L. and Dinger M.E. (2016) Long noncoding RNAs in cancer: mechanisms of action and technological advancements. Mol. Cancer 15, 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kornfeld J.W. and Brüning J.C. (2014) Regulation of metabolism by long, non-coding RNAs. Front. Genet. 5, 57 10.3389/fgene.2014.00057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rinn J.L., Kertesz M., Wang J.K., Squazzo S.L., Xu X., Brugmann S.A.et al. (2007) Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 1311–1323 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li L., Liu B., Wapinski O.L., Tsai M.C., Qu K., Zhang J.et al. (2013) Targeted disruption of Hotair leads to homeotic transformation and gene derepression. Cell Rep. 5, 3–12 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xhemalce B. (2013) From histones to RNA: role of methylation in cancer. Brief Funct. Genom. 12, 244–253 10.1093/bfgp/els064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kogo R., Shimamura T., Mimori K., Kawahara K., Imoto S., Sudo T.et al. (2011) Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR regulates polycomb-dependent chromatin modification and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 71, 6320–6326 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Milhem M.M., Knutson T., Yang S., Zhu D., Wang X., Leslie K.K.et al. (2011) Correlation of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR expression with metastasis and response to treatment in sarcoma patients. J. Cancer Sci. Ther. S5, [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J. and Jemal A. (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65, 87–108 10.3322/caac.21262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vogel A., Cervantes A., Chau I., Daniele B., Llovet J.M., Meyer T.et al. (2019) Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 30, 871–873 10.1093/annonc/mdy510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu A.X., Duda D.G., Sahani D.V. and Jain R.K. (2011) HCC and angiogenesis: possible targets and future directions. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 292–301 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morse M.A., Sun W., Kim R., He A.R., Abada P.B., Mynderse M.et al. (2019) The role of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 912–920 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen R.Y., Yen C.J., Liu Y.W., Guo C.G., Weng C.Y., Lai C.H.et al. (2020) CPAP promotes angiogenesis and metastasis by enhancing STAT3 activity. Cell Death Differ. 27, 1259–1273 10.1038/s41418-019-0413-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Folkman J. (1990) What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82, 4–6 10.1093/jnci/82.1.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arciero C.A. and Sigurdson E.R. (2006) Liver-directed therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 4, 768–774 10.6004/jnccn.2006.0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amini A., Masoumi Moghaddam S., Morris D.L. and Pourgholami M.H. (2012) The critical role of vascular endothelial growth factor in tumor angiogenesis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 12, 23–43 10.2174/156800912798888956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Siveen K.S., Prabhu K., Krishnankutty R., Kuttikrishnan S., Tsakou M., Alali F.Q.et al. (2017) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in tumour vascularization: potential and challenges. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 15, 339–351 10.2174/1570161115666170105124038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Llovet J.M., Di Bisceglie A.M., Bruix J., Kramer B.S., Lencioni R., Zhu A.X.et al. (2008) Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 100, 698–711 10.1093/jnci/djn134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.DiStefano J.K. (2017) Long noncoding RNAs in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Noncoding RNA Res. 2, 129–136 10.1016/j.ncrna.2017.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wei L., Wang X., Lv L., Liu J., Xing H., Song Y.et al. (2019) The emerging role of microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 18, 147 10.1186/s12943-019-1086-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Carpenter S. and Fitzgerald K.A. (2018) Cytokines and long noncoding RNAs. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10, 10.1101/cshperspect.a028589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Frankel L.B., Lubas M. and Lund A.H. (2017) Emerging connections between RNA and autophagy. Autophagy 13, 3–23 10.1080/15548627.2016.1222992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yousefi H., Maheronnaghsh M., Molaei F., Mashouri L., Reza Aref A., Momeny M.et al. (2020) Long noncoding RNAs and exosomal lncRNAs: classification, and mechanisms in breast cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Oncogene 39, 953–974 10.1038/s41388-019-1040-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mathy N.W. and Chen X.M. (2017) Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and their transcriptional control of inflammatory responses. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 12375–12382 10.1074/jbc.R116.760884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumar M.M. and Goyal R. (2017) LncRNA as a therapeutic target for angiogenesis. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 17, 1750–1757 10.2174/1568026617666161116144744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lin J., Cao S., Wang Y., Hu Y., Liu H., Li J.et al. (2018) Long non-coding RNA UBE2CP3 enhances HCC cell secretion of VEGFA and promotes angiogenesis by activating ERK1/2/HIF-1α/VEGFA signalling in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 113 10.1186/s13046-018-0727-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun Z., Jing C., Xiao C. and Li T. (2020) An autophagy-related long non-coding RNA prognostic signature accurately predicts survival outcomes in bladder urothelial carcinoma patients. Aging (Albany NY) 12, 15624–15637 10.18632/aging.103718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Luan F., Chen W., Chen M., Yan J., Chen H., Yu H.et al. (2019) An autophagy-related long non-coding RNA signature for glioma. FEBS Open Bio. 9, 653–667 10.1002/2211-5463.12601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA, http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/search.jsp) databases.