Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Apr 7;11:7608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87205-y

Magnetoelastic interactions and magnetic damping in Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si and Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5 Heusler alloys thin films for spintronic applications

O M Chumak 1,, A Pacewicz 2, A Lynnyk 1, B Salski 2, T Yamamoto 3, T Seki 3,4, J Z Domagala 1, H Głowiński 5, K Takanashi 3,4,6, L T Baczewski 1, H Szymczak 1, A Nabiałek 1
PMCID: PMC8027465  PMID: 33828149

Abstract

Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si (CFMS) and Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5 (CFGG) Heusler alloys are among the most promising thin film materials for spintronic devices due to a high spin polarization, low magnetic damping and giant/tunneling magnetoresistance ratios. Despite numerous investigations of Heusler alloys magnetic properties performed up to now, magnetoelastic effects in these materials remain not fully understood; due to quite rare studies of correlations between magnetoelastic and other magnetic properties, such as magnetic dissipation or magnetic anisotropy. In this research we have investigated epitaxial CFMS and CFGG Heusler alloys thin films of thickness in the range of 15–50 nm. We have determined the magnetoelastic tensor components and magnetic damping parameters as a function of the magnetic layer thickness. Magnetic damping measurements revealed the existence of non-Gilbert dissipation related contributions, including two-magnon scattering and spin pumping phenomena. Magnetoelastic constant B11 values and the effective magnetic damping parameter αeff values were found to be in the range of − 6 to 30 × 106 erg/cm3 and between 1 and 12 × 10–3, respectively. The values of saturation magnetostriction λS for CFMS Heusler alloy thin films were also obtained using the strain modulated ferromagnetic resonance technique. The correlation between αeff and B11, depending on magnetic layer thickness was determined based on the performed investigations of the above mentioned magnetic properties.

Subject terms: Magnetic properties and materials; Surfaces, interfaces and thin films; Magnetic properties and materials

Introduction

Magnetic thin films have been the subject of investigations for several decades, and up to now this area of research still remains very active. This fact is generally due to the proximity effects of surfaces and interfaces, making the thin films properties very different from their bulk counterparts.

Many actual thin film-based applications refer to spintronic devices based on half-metallic ferromagnetic materials with high spin polarization15. Using half-metallic electrodes with one of a conductor type with spin related channel of the density-of-states and another of an insulator or semiconductor type, theoretically up to 100% spin polarization at the Fermi level can be achieved6,7.

In this respect, due to low magnetic damping properties, among many candidates for half-metallic ferromagnetic electrodes6,7 full-Heusler materials occupy one of the leading position811. Using a general X2YZ chemical formula, where X and Y denote transition metals while Z denotes one of the main-group elements, most of half-metallic alloys belong to wide Co2YZ group4,12 with half-metallicity and high Curie temperature4,13. Co2YZ Heusler alloys are widely used in various spintronic applications, like tunnel magnetoresistance devices14,15, current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance devices1628, lateral spin-valves2931 and spin injectors into semiconductors9,32,33. The last studies also revealed topological semimetal properties in such materials34. Up to now Co2YZ Heusler alloys remain among the ones of greatest research interest6,10,31,3446.

Among Co2YZ Heusler materials a special place is occupied by the quaternary alloys Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si (CFMS) and Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5 (CFGG). The properties of CFMS alloys have been intensively investigated since 2006, when it was reported that an alloy of such composition possesses a more stable spin polarized band structure in comparison with other Co2YZ Heusler alloys47,48. Since that time CFMS alloys have been used to achieve large magnetoresistance effect19,20, tunnel magnetoresistance effect4952, and to design a spin torque oscillators5356. Highly spin polarized CFGG alloys were also investigated from the magnetoresistance point of view18,21,29. Novel graphene/CFGG heterostructures were recently reported to be used in high-performance graphene based spintronic devices10. Such heterostructures possess several significant advantages over the other reported ones18,21,29.

Magnetic damping properties of CFMS and CFGG alloys were reported to have low values of the Gilbert damping parameter — about 10–3 (Ref.44,5760). The importance of a non-Gilbert-damping mechanism in such Heusler materials was studied in the paper61, indicating particular importance of the intrinsic two-magnon scattering mechanism. Strong perpendicular magnetic anisotropy was recently observed in ultrathin (below 2 nm) Co2YZ Heusler thin-film structures6265, what was explained by the formation of a CoFe ordered alloy at the interface, which also caused an increase of the Gilbert damping parameter.

However, magnetoelastic properties of Co2YZ Heusler films remain poorly investigated, in spite of numerous studies on their magnetic properties performed during the last two decades. One of the main reasons for such situation is a limited number of methods, which allow studying magnetoelastic properties in thin films. The magnetoelastic part of magnetic anisotropy in Co2FeAl films was studied by Belmeguenai et al.66,67. The effects connected with piezoelectric strain were studied in Co2FeAl68 and Co2MnAl69. The changes in magnetic anisotropy associated with strain-induced tetragonal lattice distortion in Co2MnSi and Co2FeSi thin films were investigated by Pandey et al.70, nevertheless, this approach neglected the presence of surface effects.

Application of the magnetic films in spintronics at high frequencies requires low magnetic damping, but an increase of magnetoelastic effect usually leads to an increase of magnetic damping, for this reason, materials characterized by weak magnetoelastic effect are usually applied in spintronics.

However, there is a certain group of applications in which both low damping and high magnetostriction are required. As an example, the so-called acoustic spintronics can be given, in which spin currents are generated by mechanical excitation7173.

Recently, the concept of the organic magnetoelastic coupling was presented74 leading to possibility of the rapid and effective mechanical control of spin polarization in organic multiferroic-magnetoelastic materials. To realize magnetoelastic coupling in organic crystals, a charge transfer-induced energy level splitting leading to spin polarization, and a strong spin–lattice coupling should occur. Charge transfer-induced energy level splitting leading to the room temperature ferromagnetism, and a significant magnetoelastic effect, was recently discovered in coronene-TCNQ74.

In non-reciprocal microwave devices, the magnetic properties can be controlled by means of voltage using the piezoelectric effect75. These devices could be improved if materials possessing low magnetic losses but a strong magnetic response to mechanical strain are available.

Recently magnetically soft epitaxial spinel NiZnAl-ferrite thin films were found, which possess a low magnetic damping and strong magnetoelastic coupling at the same time, revealing a new class of low-loss magnetoelastic thin film materials76.

In spite of the several experimental studies reported so far77,78, the mechanism of a correlation between magnetoelastic and magnetic damping properties in thin film materials is not sufficiently understood yet. Another important factor is that most studies related to such correlations were reported only for the permalloy type materials7779.

In this work we report studies of magnetoelastic and magnetic damping properties of epitaxial CFMS and CFGG thin films80 with an additional Ag buffer layer and different magnetic layer thicknesses. Magnetoelastic effect was studied by means of the Strain Modulated Ferromagnetic Resonance (FMR) technique81,82, which enables the determination of magnetoelastic tensor components of thin film materials by applying a controlled strain to a metallic thin film. Special emphasis was placed on the correlation between magnetoelastic constants B11 and the effective magnetic damping parameter αeff for magnetic layers of a constant composition but different thickness.

Experimental

Four series of Heusler alloy Co2YZ thin films were grown on MgO (001) substrates (see Fig. 1) with the Cr buffer layer of 20-nm-thickness using UHV-compatible magnetron sputtering systems with previously calibrated alloy targets. The deposition rate for each sputtering target was obtained by measuring the thickness of the single layer sample prepared with a fixed sputtering input power. The Cr buffer layer was applied in order to decrease the lattice mismatch between the Heusler alloy magnetic layer and the MgO substrate, and thus enable epitaxial growth. Two different sputtering systems were used for the CFMS and CFGG samples: multi-cathode sputtering machine (ULVAC Inc.) for CFMS and single-cathode sputtering machine with revolver-type target changer (Eiko Corp.) for CFGG. For both sputtering systems, the base pressure was of the order of 10–7–10–8 Pa, and Ar gas pressure was in the range about 0.1–1 Pa. Before starting the deposition, the annealing of MgO substrate at 600 °C was carried out. The 20-nm-thick Cr buffer layers were deposited at room temperature and in situ annealed at 600 °C to obtain a low roughness surface. Apart from Co2YZ samples deposited on the Cr buffer, the samples with an additional Ag buffer layer on the Cr one were grown with the aim of reducing of Cr atoms diffusion into a magnetic layer. Most of the films were additionally covered by a 5 nm Au or 3 nm Ta capping layer in order to prevent surface oxidation. Magnetic layers were deposited at room temperature (except for CFGG with Ag buffer samples which were grown at 250 °C) and were subsequently annealed at 500 °C for 20 min in order to promote the chemical ordering35,83. In situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) images after each layer deposition process were recorded and ex situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed to control the surface and structure quality of grown thin films. Series of the films with different magnetic layer thicknesses (from 15 to 50 nm) were grown in order to check how the thickness of the magnetic layer influence the quality of the epitaxial growth and structural ordering. Studying of the samples series with different magnetic layer thicknesses enables determination of the surface effects (surface anisotropy and surface magnetoelastic coupling) influence on magnetic, magnetoelastic and damping properties of the investigated samples.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Investigated samples belong to 4 series: CFMS and CFGG on Cr buffer layer with or without the additional Ag buffer layer.

To determine magnetoelastic constants of the magnetic thin films, Strain Modulated FMR technique was applied, which uses a standard X-band spectrometer equipped with an additional system for applying the controlled strain modulation (all details are given in Ref.82). The observed FMR line shift due to the strain effect contains information on the magnetoelastic tensor Bijkl components. In this case magnetic free energy of the system includes also a magnetoelastic energy contribution.

EME=i,j,k,l=13Bijklαiαjεkl 1

where αi and αj are directional cosines of the magnetization vector, εkl denotes the strain tensor. For an isotropic case the tensor Bijkl can be constructed using only one magnetoelastic constant, e.g. B1111; in Voigt notation B1111 = B11.

The thin film sample face was glued to the quartz rod, with square (3 × 3 mm3) cross-section in which periodic strains were induced by a piezoelectric generator82. The strains induced in the sample plane were ε11 and ε22, in the direction parallel and perpendicular to the rod, respectively. In our system no shear strain in the plane of the film was induced (i.e. ε12 = 0). The crystallographic [110] axis of the epitaxially grown Heusler alloy layer was oriented parallel to the rod, and the external magnetic field in Strain Modulated FMR experiments was oriented perpendicular to the rod and parallel to the investigated film plane. From the shift of a FMR line induced by the strain the magnetoelastic constant B11 was calculated assuming the magnetoelastic properties of the magnetic layer are isotropic.

For most of the studied samples Agilent Technologies Vector Network Analyzer FMR spectrometer with a micro-stripe line was used to record FMR curves either with a frequency swept at a fixed magnetic field strength or with magnetic field swept at a fixed frequency, using the measurement protocol given in84.

In all Vector Network Analyzer FMR experiments the external magnetic field was applied parallel to the film plane, and parallel to [110] crystallographic axis of the epitaxially grown magnetic layer. For this reason, the dragging effect, which occurs when the sample magnetization is not parallel to the external magnetic field, could be neglected in the analysis of frequency dependence of the FMR linewidth85. Bruker EMX X-band spectrometer with a resonant cavity was used for the basic FMR measurements. A SQUID magnetometer was used to determine the saturation magnetization of all samples. In order to check the crystallographic quality of the layer and possible deformation of its crystal lattice, a high-resolution X-ray diffractometer with a 4-reflection Ge (220) monochromator and X-ray mirror, radiation — CuKα1 and an analyzer in front of a proportional detector was used for the sample with the thickest CFMS layer (50 nm) grown on the Ag buffer.

Results and discussion

The RHEED patterns obtained for the magnetic Heusler layers revealed a low roughness surface and the epitaxial growth with relationships of crystallographic directions: MgO (001) || Cr (001) || magnetic layer (001) or MgO (001) || Cr (001) || Ag (001) || magnetic layer (001) and for all the samples superlattice (200) streaks were clearly observed. In accordance with the RHEED patterns, the (200) superlattice diffractions as well as the (400) fundamental diffractions of the Heusler layers were clearly observed in XRD patterns for all the samples (see Fig. 2). The well-defined (400) diffraction peak indicates that the samples are well crystallized, having cubic symmetry. The intense (200) superlattice peak indicates that all magnetic layers have at least the B2 ordered structure.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

XRD scan patterns for CFMS (a) and CFGG (b) samples with 50-nm-thick magnetic layer and with/without the Ag buffer layer; the peaks indicated by *originate from the MgO single crystal substrate.

Magnetoelastic interactions in the studied samples are relatively weak (part of the data was previously published80). Experimentally determined magnetoelastic constants B11 have values in the range of − (6–30) × 106 erg/cm3 (see Table 1), which are close to the values reported for Co2YSi (with Y = Fe or Mn)70 and for Co2FeAl66. Figure 3 illustrates the magnetoelastic constants dependence on the film thickness. The saturation magnetostriction λS can be described as:

λS=-B11c11-c12 2

where c11 and c12 are elastic constants. The values of λS for all the studied samples are positive and similar to the values obtained for Co2FeAl66 and Co2MnAl86 Heusler alloy thin films. For all 4 series of the studied samples an increase of the magnetoelastic constant absolute value and saturation magnetostriction with increasing of the magnetic layer thickness was observed.

Table 1.

The values of the magnetoelastic tensor components B11 and corresponding saturation magnetostriction λS obtained for CFMS and CFGG thin film samples.

d, nm Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5
With Ag Without Ag With Ag Without Ag
B11, 106 erg/cm3 λS, 10–5 B11, 106 erg/cm3 λS, 10–5 B11, 106 erg/cm3 B11, 106 erg/cm3
15 − 6.67 0.54 − 21.74
30 − 13.10 1.08 − 12.90 1.06 − 24.52 − 16.30
50 − 17.50 1.44 − 13.20 1.08 − 29.86 − 24.60

Elastic constants used for λS calculation are taken from87.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Magnetoelastic constant B11 for CFMS and CFGG films as a function of the inverse of magnetic layer thickness at room temperature.

Similar to the concept of the surface anisotropy88, the concept of the so-called surface magnetoelastic coupling was introduced89,90. In this case the magnetoelastic constant can be, formally, divided into two parts:

B11=B11,V+2B11,Sd, 3

where d is a magnetic layer thickness, B11,V and B11,S are the volume and surface components of the magnetoelastic constant, respectively. Using the experimental data of the thickness dependence of magnetoelastic constants B11, shown in Fig. 3, and assuming a linear fit (see dotted lines in Fig. 3) the B11,V and B11,S parameters values were determined for the samples series, containing 3 samples: for the CFMS thin films without the additional Ag buffer layer: B11,V(CFMS) = − 17.0 × 106 erg/cm3, B11,S(CFMS) = 7.5 erg/cm2, and for the Ag-buffered CFGG thin films: B11,V(CFGG) = − 31.6 × 106 erg/cm3, B11,S(CFGG) = 7.8 erg/cm2.

Very little experimental work was up to now devoted to the study of surface magnetoelastic coupling. The estimated by us surface components of the magnetoelastic constants for CFMS and CFGG films are very close to those found in epitaxial iron films deposited on GsAs91,92. Although the volume components of the magnetoelastic constants in these iron films were found to depend on both sample preparation procedure and the structure of the films (using additional overlayers91), the surface components of all the investigated films were very similar: b1S ~ 11 erg/cm3. For an isotropic sample b1S = (3/2)B11,S, which gives a good consistency with our results.

For all investigated in this study series of samples the magnetoelastic constant absolute values decrease with decreasing magnetic layer thickness (see Fig. 3). Hence, the magnetoelastic effect in such thin layers is weaker than that expected in bulk materials.

The obtained for CFMS samples saturation magnetostriction value λS = 1.44 × 10–5, is in accordance with the experimental value reported for Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al Heusler alloy bulk sample93 and the recent theoretical calculations for Co2XAl Heusler alloys94, where X = V, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe.

The concept of surface magnetoelastic coupling89,90 can explain the incerase of the magnetoelastic constants absolute values with increasing thickness for the studied magnetic layers. Existing theoretical papers predict several mechanisms responsible for surface magnetoelastic coupling (see e.g. review paper95). Among them the most important are spin–orbit interactions (single-ion model) and dipole–dipole interactions. Other mechanisms observed in both single layers and multilayers are non-linear contributions to bulk magnetoelastic coefficients due to surface strains and surface roughness effects. Also the presence of interdiffusion layers which are formed at the interface should be taken into account.

As the magnetoelastic constant can be changed by a strain, their changes with the thickness of the magnetic layers may be also a result of structural relaxation. In our previous studies80, we found the magnitude of the perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy of investigated samples to be decreasing with increasing magnetic layer thickness. Such a behavior could suggest an occurrence of structural relaxation. For the strained Heusler alloys their cubic symmetry will be lowered and in order to check such a possibility additional X-ray studies were performed.

For the sample with the thickest CFMS layer (50 nm) grown on the Ag buffer additional detailed XRD studies were performed (see Figs. 4 and 5). From the rocking curve measurements of the (004) and (224) reflections, we obtained the half-widths of the ω-scans equal to 0.75° and 0.65°, respectively. This indicates that, in addition to the undoubted widening associated with a small layer thickness, we are probably observing the influence of mosaic-type defects. In order to calculate the lattice deformation, 2-dimensional X-ray diffusion scattering maps around the symmetric (004) (Fig. 4a) and asymmetric (224) (Fig. 5a) reflexes were obtained. Projections of the map nodes on the 2θ axis and fitting Gaussian curves to the obtained measurement points allowed to determine the interplanar distances for (004) and (224) planes (see Figs. 4b and 5b, respectively). Hence, we obtained lattice unit parameters: a = 5.675 ± 0.001 Å and a||= 5.643 ± 0.005 Å indicating a tetragonal deformation of about 0.5%, which results in the appearance of the strain induced anisotropy. Errors in determining lattice unit parameters were assessed from the ambiguity of fitting Gaussian curves to projections of maps and measurement method.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The X-ray intensity distribution around the (004) reflection (a) and nod projection into the 2θ axis (b) for the 50-nm-thick CFMS layer grown on the Ag buffer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The X-ray intensity distribution around the (224) reflection (a) and nod projection into the 2θ axis (b) for the 50-nm-thick CFMS layer grown on the Ag buffer.

As the tetragonal distortion of the investigated sample was found to be very small, it seems that not the structural relaxation but rather the surface magnetoelastic coupling is responsible for the observed magnetoelastic constants absolute values increase with increasing thickness of the magnetic layer. It is possible that the observed changes of the magnetoelastic constants may be also connected with the thickness dependent structural ordering occurring for thicker layers as it was reported for Co2FeSi layers96.

Using the formula for magnetoelastic energy (1) for an isotropic sample case and assuming the tetragonal distortion (ε11 = ε22) the formula for the strain induced contribution to the uniaxial anisotropy constant KSI can be written as:

KSI=32B11ε11-ε33, 4

where the strain component ε33 = − 2(c12/c1111.

Taking the data from our experiments: ε11 = − 2.44 × 10–3, B11 = − 17.50 × 106 and elastic constants87, we have obtained the value of KSI = (1.39 ± 0.23) × 105 erg/cm3. It has the opposite sign and a small value in comparison to the overall magnetocrystalline anisotropy of relatively low and negative value |K|< 1.5 × 106 erg/cm3 which was determined from FMR/SQUID studies80. Strain causes an increase of the anisotropy constant and reduces its absolute value. The minimal tetragonal distortion value, which is necessary to switch the magnetic layer anisotropy from an easy-plane to an easy axis type, was estimated to be at least ε11-min ≈ − 0.07; but such a large strain is not likely to be present in our samples.

Such a large estimated critical value of the distortion results from the fact that a large demagnetizing energy in a thin film (proportional to the magnetization) must be overcome by the strain induced anisotropy, which is proportional to a (relatively small) magnetoelastic constant.

Magnetic damping is proportional to the FMR linewidth. However there are many mechanisms that may be responsible for the dissipation of magnetic energy in thin magnetic films, thus the full width at half maximum in registered FMR spectra can include the following contributions85: ΔH = ΔH0 + ΔHTMS + ΔHG+sp, where ΔH0 denotes the frequency-independent sample inhomogeneity contribution, ΔHTMS denotes the two-magnon scattering contribution (TMS), while the last term ΔHG+sp contains the spin pumping (SP) and Gilbert damping contributions and is proportional to αeff × f, where αeff is an effective magnetic damping parameter and f is the FMR frequency85. Considering the TMS mechanism is especially important for the samples characterized by low Gilbert damping when the external magnetic field is parallel to the film97.

Figure 6 shows the experimental frequency dependence of half-maximum width ∆H for the 30 nm CFMS sample without additional silver buffer layer. It is clearly seen that at frequencies below 8 GHz this dependence is nonlinear and a slope of the curve decreases with increasing frequency but above 8 GHz, almost linear dependence was observed. Such a dependence of ∆H is typical if the TMS contributes to the damping processes98,99. In the low frequency range the ∆HTMS vs. frequency is nonlinear, while it saturates at high frequencies. For this reason in the high frequency range, the slope of the ∆H can be assumed to be proportional to effective magnetic damping parameter αeff. The estimated values of αeff for all samples studied in our experiments are presented in Tab.2. After subtraction of ΔHG+sp and ΔH0 the ΔHTMS can be evaluated, which is also presented in Fig. 6. It can be seen that the ΔHTMS contribution to the total ∆H is relatively strong, which is typical for in-plane broad band FMR experiments if the effective magnetic damping parameter is relatively small97.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Resonance line full width at half maximum for the 30 nm CFMS sample without additional silver buffer layer as a function of frequency at room temperature. Solid line presents a linear fit for the frequencies above 8 GHz, which slope is proportional to αeff. Empty symbols present the extracted as described above, two magnon scattering contribution (TMS).

Table 2.

The effective magnetic damping parameter αeff values for the studied CFMS and CFGG samples.

d, nm Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5
With Ag Without Ag With Ag Without Ag
αeff, 10–3 αeff, 10–3 αeff, 10–3 αeff, 10–3
15 1.00 ± 0.82 5.97 ± 0.79
30 2.59 ± 0.74 1.90 ± 0.10 1.85 ± 0.70 7.20 ± 1.00
50 3.88 ± 0.89 4.50 ± 0.19 1.72 ± 0.14 11.94 ± 0.76

The magnetic damping parameters in the studied samples are evaluated to be of the order of 10–3; but the application of the additional Ag buffer layer in case of the CFGG samples resulted in a significant reduction of the αeff value.

It should be noted that contrary to other samples, the Ag-buffered CFGG thin films have the cover layer of Ta, which has a strong spin–orbit coupling and as a consequence, the value of the frequency proportional contribution ΔHG+sp ~ αeff × f is increased due to the presence of the spin pumping phenomenon100 and only for these samples αeff is decreasing with increasing magnetic layer thickness (see column 4 in Table 2). In the case of other investigated samples which were without Ta — but having Au cover layer—it was found that the effective magnetic damping parameter αeff increases with the magnetic layer thickness (see Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effective magnetic damping parameter αeff for CFMS and CFGG samples as a function of magnetic layer thickness at room temperature.

It should be emphasized that for all studied samples, the increase of magnetic layer thickness is accompanied by the increase of the magnetoelastic constant B11 absolute value. Therefore, for the samples, where effective magnetic damping parameter αeff may be considered as Gilbert damping parameter α (without spin pumping contribution due to a presence of Ta), the increase of the absolute value of magnetoelastic constant is accompanied by the increase of the damping parameter (see also Fig. 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The correlation between the absolute values of the magnetoelastic constants B11, and the effective magnetic damping parameter αeff for the three series of the samples, for which the influence of the spin pumping on the magnetic damping can be neglected. Dashed line shows the fit using quadratic function.

It is generally assumed77,79,101,102 that the amplification of the magnetoelastic effect should lead to an increase of magnetic damping. In the case of thin magnetic films, this hypothesis was verified by a number of experimental studies conducted mainly for Ni–Fe films. For example the correlation between magnetic damping and magnetostriction in permalloy films of different compositions was reported by several authors77,79. The variation of the magnetostriction constant from − 0.7 × 10–5 to 1.5 × 10–5 was caused by changing of a Ni-to-Fe ratio where λ = 0 for Ni80Fe20 composition. Nevertheless, it is difficult to find formulas which correlate the magnetoelastic constants and damping parameters quantitatively. Bonin et al.79 assumed that the correlation of magnetic damping with strain fluctuations was induced by the magnetoelastic effect. To describe the fluctuation processes that affect damping, originating during the magnetization reorientation process, the use of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics is required. In Ref.79, the self-organized criticality103 was used to perform the experimental data analysis. A model of correlation between the magnetostriction and relaxation mechanism was also presented in Ref.101, where the coupling between the magnetic motion and lattice was based purely on continuum arguments concerning magnetostriction. In Ref.102, dynamics of magnetization coupled to a thermal bath of elastic modes was analyzed. Both models, in Refs.101 and102, predict a damping factor to be proportional to the square of the magnetoelastic constants. Most importantly in Ref.102, an increase of the damping factor with the increase of the magnetic layer thickness was anticipated what is confirmed by our results.

Figure 8 shows the correlation between the absolute values of the magnetoelastic constants B11, and the effective magnetic damping parameter αeff for the three series of the samples studied in our experiments, for which the influence of the spin pumping on the magnetic damping can be neglected (no Ta capping layer). Experimental data of all three series were collected in one plot. Although the scatter of experimental data is large, one can see a general tendency of the effective damping increasing with an increase of B11 magnitude. In Fig. 8 a fit using the quadratic function is also shown. As discussed above, such dependence was predicted by some of theoretical models describing correlations between magnetoelastic properties and damping101,102.

However, it must be kept in mind that beside the magnetoelastic effect also other parameters influence the magnetic damping, and if these parameters change with the thickness of the magnetic layer this can also result in the changes of magnetic damping. In particular, half-metallicity and Gilbert damping factor in Co2FexMn1-xSi Heusler alloys depending on the film composition were investigated in Ref.57 and Gilbert damping parameter in Co2FexMn1-xSi Heusler alloys was shown to be correlated with their band structure The minimum of the damping parameter (α ≈ 0.003) was found for the composition with x = 0.4. The results were discussed assuming the Gilbert damping constant to be proportional to the square of the spin–orbit coupling parameter and total density of states of the d-band at Fermi energy.

In the experimental studies performed earlier by other researches77,79, the variation of magnetoelastic properties was induced by the change of film composition. In the case of the results obtained and discussed in this paper, the samples have a constant composition in one series of samples and an increase of magnetic damping is correlated with an increase of the absolute value of magnetoelastic constants, which increases with increasing magnetic layer thickness.

Such an effect has not been observed so far. The observation and study of such correlations are important also from the point of view of applications in spin-mechanical devices, for which thin film materials possessing low magnetic damping with a sizable magnetoelastic effect are sought76.

Although the correlation between the magnetoelastic properties and damping factor in thin films is not fully understood yet, most models developed up to date predict an increase of the damping factor with the increase of the magnetoelastic constants magnitude and/or with the thickness of a magnetic layer. This is consistent with our experimental observations. Because of the lack of several important parameters included in the existing theoretical models like the elastic relaxation time or the exchange stiffness constant, quantitative comparison of our results with these models is difficult. It should also be remembered that the magnetoelastic mechanism may not be the only one responsible for the changes of the damping coefficient values observed in our experiments, e.g. the conductivity of the samples was neglected in our considerations. The changes of the structural ordering with the thickness of magnetic layer may also influence the band structure, and thus the Gilbert damping.

Conclusions

Magnetoelastic properties and magnetic damping for several series of quaternary Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si and Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5 Heusler alloy thin magnetic films were determined by the Strain Modulated FMR and the Vector Network Analyzer FMR methods, respectively. The magnetoelastic constants were found to have relatively small and negative values while saturation magnetostriction for all the studied samples was positive. It was shown that two-magnon scattering and spin pumping phenomena play an important role in the magnetic damping of microwaves in the studied magnetic thin films.

The frequency dependent FMR linewidths were found to be strongly inhomogeneous; the resonance line FWHM nonlinear dependence evidences that the inhomogeneous broadening is correlated mainly with two magnon scattering processes. It was revealed that the magnetic damping in the investigated samples is strongly influenced by the type of metal used for a buffer or cover layer; where specifically the use of Ta cover layer leads to a strong spin pumping phenomenon appearance. Linear dependence of the resonance line at high frequencies enabled determination of the magnetic Gilbert damping parameter for the studied samples, assuming that the TMS contribution at these frequencies is saturated.

The saturation magnetostriction (λ ≈ 10–5) and low magnetic damping parameter (αeff ≈ 10–3) values in the investigated Heusler alloys thin films are similar to the results of the pioneering work73, where a new class of materials promising for spin-mechanical devices was reported. Calculated strain, which is necessary to switch the magnetic anisotropy from the easy-plane to the magnetization easy axis type, is too large (ε11-min ≈ − 0.07) to be achieved in the epitaxially grown magnetic layers.

In the samples for which it was possible to neglect the spin pumping phenomenon (i.e. without the Ta cover layer), the correlation between the Gilbert damping parameter and magnetoelastic constants was obtained. Based on the fact that both the magnetic damping parameter and the absolute value of the magnetoelastic constant increase with magnetic layer thickness, it was concluded that the enhanced magnetoelastic effects are accompanied by a stronger magnetic damping. An increase of the absolute values of magnetoelastic constants with increasing thickness of the magnetic layer can be explained as a result of surface magnetoelastic coupling and/or the thickness dependent structural ordering. An increase of Gilbert damping can be correlated with increasing magnetoelastic constants or changes in the band structure caused by the changes of structural ordering.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the grant from Polish National Science Centre — Project 2018/31/B/ST7/04006. The authors also thank R. Żuberek, K. Nesteruk and J. Krupka for many fruitful discussions.

Author contributions

O.M.C., A.N., L.T.B., T.S., K.T. and H.S. proposed the idea. T.Y., T.S. and L.T.B. grew the samples and performed RHEED and general XRD characterization. T.Y., T.S. and A.L. performed and interpreted magnetic moment measurements. O.M.C. performed X-band FMR and Strain Modulated FMR measurements. A.P. and B.S. designed and implemented the automated Vector Network Analyzer FMR measurement system, including measurement control and post-processing software, and the microstrip line. O.M.C. and H.G. performed and interpreted Vector Network Analyzer FMR measurements. J.Z.D. performed and interpreted rocking curve and X-ray diffusion scattering maps measurements. O.M.C., A.N., L.T.B. and H.S. conducted analysis and interpretation of the results. O.M.C. prepared the manuscript with support of all coauthors.

Data availability

All data reported in this manuscript is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.de Groot RA, Mueller FM, van Engen PG, Buschow KHJ. New class of materials: Half-metallic ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983;50:2024–2027. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kübler J, William AR, Sommers CB. Formation and coupling of magnetic moments in Heusler alloys. Phys. Rev. B. 1983;28:1745–1755. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.1745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fang CM, de Wijs GA, de Groot RA. Spin-polarization in half-metals (invited) J. Appl. Phys. 2002;91:8340. doi: 10.1063/1.1452238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Graf T, Felser C, Parkin SSP. Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2011;39:1–50. doi: 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Felser C, Hirohata A. Heusler alloys: Properties, growth, applications. Springer; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Basha A, et al. Interface alloying of ultra-thin sputter-deposited Co2MnSi films as a source of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;489:165367. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farshchi R, Ramsteiner M. Spin injection from Heusler alloys into semiconductors: A materials perspective. J. Appl. Phys. 2013;113:191101. doi: 10.1063/1.4802504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alloys H-M. Fundamentals and Applications. Springer; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin X, Yang W, Wang KL, Zhao W. Two-dimensional spintronics for low-power electronics. Nat. Electron. 2019;2:274–283. doi: 10.1038/s41928-019-0273-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li S, et al. Graphene/half-metallic heusler alloy: A novel heterostructure toward high-performance graphene spintronic devices. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:e1905734. doi: 10.1002/adma.201905734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Felser C, Wollmann L, Chadov S, Fecher GH, Parkin SSP. Basics and prospective of magnetic Heusler compounds. APL Mater. 2015;3:041518. doi: 10.1063/1.4917387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Palmstrøm CJ. Heusler compounds and spintronics. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2016;62:371–397. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2016.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Galanakis I, Dederichs PH, Papanikolaou N. Slater-Pauling behavior and origin of the half-metallicity of the full-Heusler alloys. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;66:174429. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.174429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sakuraba Y, et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in Co2MnSi∕Al–O∕Co2MnSi magnetic tunnel junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;88:192508. doi: 10.1063/1.2202724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu H-X, et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in epitaxial Co 2 MnSi/MgO/Co 2 MnSi magnetic tunnel junctions by half-metallicity of Co 2 MnSi and coherent tunneling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;101:132418. doi: 10.1063/1.4755773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Furubayashi T, et al. Current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance in spin-valve structures using epitaxial Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5/Ag/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 trilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008;93:122507. doi: 10.1063/1.2990647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iwase T, et al. Large interface spin-asymmetry and magnetoresistance in fully epitaxial Co 2 MnSi/Ag/Co 2 MnSi current-perpendicular-to-plane magnetoresistive devices. Appl. Phys. Express. 2009;2:063003. doi: 10.1143/APEX.2.063003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takahashi YK, et al. Large magnetoresistance in current-perpendicular-to-plane pseudospin valve using a Co2Fe(Ge0.5Ga0.5) Heusler alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98:152501. doi: 10.1063/1.3576923. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sato J, Oogane M, Naganuma H, Ando Y. Large magnetoresistance effect in epitaxial Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si/Ag/Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si devices. Appl. Phys. Express. 2011;4:113005. doi: 10.1143/APEX.4.113005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sakuraba Y, et al. Extensive study of giant magnetoresistance properties in half-metallic Co 2 (Fe, Mn)Si-based devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;101:252408. doi: 10.1063/1.4772546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li S, Takahashi YK, Furubayashi T, Hono K. Enhancement of giant magnetoresistance by L21 ordering in Co2Fe(Ge0.5Ga0.5) Heusler alloy current-perpendicular-to-plane pseudo spin valves. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:042405. doi: 10.1063/1.4816382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takagishi M, Yamada K, Iwasaki H, Fuke HN, Hashimoto S. Magnetoresistance ratio and resistance area design of CPP-MR film for 2–5 Tb/in2 read sensors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010;46:2086–2089. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2045739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Diao Z, et al. Half-metal CPP GMR sensor for magnetic recording. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014;356:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.12.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mihajlovic G, et al. improved signal-to-noise ratio in current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance sensors using strong exchange-biased reference layers. IEEE Magn. Lett. 2017;8:1–4. doi: 10.1109/LMAG.2016.2620119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kubota T, Ina Y, Wen Z, Takanashi K. Temperature dependence of current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance in the junctions with interface tailored Heusler alloy electrodes. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;474:365–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kubota T, Ina Y, Wen Z, Narisawa H, Takanashi K. Current perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance using an L 1 2 Ag 3 Mg spacer and Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy electrodes: Spacer thickness and annealing temperature dependence. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2017;1:044402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.044402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wen Z, Kubota T, Ina Y, Takanashi K. Dual-spacer nanojunctions exhibiting large current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance for ultrahigh density magnetic recording. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;110:102401. doi: 10.1063/1.4977948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kubota T, et al. Current perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistance devices using half-metallic Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si electrodes and a Ag–Mg spacer. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017;50:014004. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/50/1/014004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Takahashi YK, Kasai S, Hirayama S, Mitani S, Hono K. All-metallic lateral spin valves using Co 2 Fe(Ge 0.5 Ga 0.5) Heusler alloy with a large spin signal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;100:052405. doi: 10.1063/1.3681804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hamaya K, et al. Estimation of the spin polarization for Heusler-compound thin films by means of nonlocal spin-valve measurements: Comparison of Co 2 FeSi and Fe 3 Si. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2012;85:100404(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.100404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hoffmann G, Herfort J, Ramsteiner M. Spin generation in completely MBE-grown Co 2 FeSi/MgO/GaAs lateral spin valves. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2019;3:074402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.074402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ramsteiner M, et al. Co 2 FeSi/GaAs/(Al, Ga) As spin light-emitting diodes: Competition between spin injection and ultrafast spin alignment. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2008;78:121303(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.121303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Akiho T, et al. Electrical injection of spin-polarized electrons and electrical detection of dynamic nuclear polarization using a Heusler alloy spin source. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2013;87:235205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang Q, Wen Z, Kubota T, Seki T, Takanashi K. Structural-order dependence of anomalous Hall effect in Co 2 MnGa topological semimetal thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;115:252401. doi: 10.1063/1.5127553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li S, et al. Enhancement of current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistive outputs by improving B2-order in polycrystalline Co2(Mn0.6Fe0.4)Ge Heusler alloy films with the insertion of amorphous CoFeBTa underlayer. Acta Mater. 2018;142:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gao Q, Opahle I, Zhang H. High-throughput screening for spin-gapless semiconductors in quaternary Heusler compounds. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2019;3:024410. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.024410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Paudel R, Zhu J. Theoretical study of mechanical stability and physical properties of Co2V1−xZrxGa. J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 2019;32:1261–1269. doi: 10.1007/s10948-018-4773-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Husain S, et al. Observation of skyrmions at room temperature in CoFeAl Heusler alloy ultrathin film heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35832-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Husain S, et al. Multi-jump magnetization switching in Co2FeAl full Heusler alloy thin films: Experiments and simulations. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;486:165258. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen T, Wang J, Cheng Z, Wang X, Chen H. Structural, electronic and magnetic properties of MnGa/CoMnSi (x = 1, 3) bilayers. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:16530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34881-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang X, et al. Direct observation of high spin polarization in CoFeAl thin films. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:8074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26285-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Manipatruni S, et al. Scalable energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin-orbit logic. Nature. 2019;565:35–42. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0770-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hammerath F, et al. Structure-property relationship of CoMnSi thin films in response to He-irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:2766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39435-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Guillemard C, et al. Polycrystalline Co 2 Mn-based Heusler thin films with high spin polarization and low magnetic damping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;115:172401. doi: 10.1063/1.5121614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shigeta I, et al. Transport properties of epitaxial films for superconductor NbN and half-metallic Heusler alloy Co2MnSi under high magnetic fields. Physica B Condens. Matter. 2018;536:310–313. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.09.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nakatani N, et al. Deposition temperature dependence of interface magnetism of Co 2 FeGe-Heusler-alloy/Ag films studied with 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018;464:71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.05.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Balke B, et al. Properties of the quaternary half-metal-type Heusler alloy Co 2 Mn 1–x Fe x Si. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2006;74:104405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.104405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shigeta I, et al. Fabrication and characterization of epitaxial films of superconductor NbN and highly spin-polarized Heusler alloy Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si. IEEE Magn. Lett. 2017;8:1–5. doi: 10.1109/LMAG.2017.2687878. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kudo N, Oogane M, Tsunoda M, Ando Y. Polycrystalline Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy thin films with high B2 ordering and small magnetic anisotropy for magnetic tunnel junction based sensors. AIP Adv. 2019;9:125036. doi: 10.1063/1.5130461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jackson E, Sun M, Kubota T, Takanashi K, Hirohata A. Chemical and structural analysis on magnetic tunnel junctions using a decelerated scanning electron beam. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:7585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25638-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moges K, et al. Enhanced half-metallicity of off-stoichiometric quaternary Heusler alloy C o 2 (Mn, Fe) Si investigated through saturation magnetization and tunneling magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2016;93:134403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.134403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sun M, et al. Buffer layer dependence of magnetoresistance effects in Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si/MgO/Co50Fe50 tunnel junctions. AIP Adv. 2018;8:055902. doi: 10.1063/1.5007766. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Seki T, et al. High power all-metal spin torque oscillator using full Heusler Co 2 (Fe, Mn)Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:092406. doi: 10.1063/1.4895024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yamamoto T, Seki T, Takanashi K. Vortex spin-torque oscillator using Co 2 Fe x Mn 1–x Si Heusler alloys. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2016;94:094419. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yamamoto T, Seki T, Kotsugi M, Takanashi K. Magnetic vortex in epitaxially-grown Co 2 (Fe, Mn)Si alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;108:152402. doi: 10.1063/1.4945730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Seki T, Kubota T, Yamamoto T, Takanashi K. Size dependence of vortex-type spin torque oscillation in a Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy disk. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018;51:075005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kubota T, et al. Half-metallicity and Gilbert damping constant in Co2FexMn1−xSi Heusler alloys depending on the film composition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;94:122504. doi: 10.1063/1.3105982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Varaprasad BSDCS, et al. Spin polarization and Gilbert damping of Co2Fe(GaxGe1−x) Heusler alloys. Acta Mater. 2012;60:6257–6265. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pan S, Seki T, Takanashi K, Barman A. Ultrafast demagnetization mechanism in half-metallic Heusler alloy thin films controlled by the Fermi level. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2020;101:224412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.224412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pan S, Seki T, Takanashi K, Barman A. Role of the Cr buffer layer in the thickness-dependent ultrafast magnetization dynamics of Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy thin films. Phys. Rev. Applied. 2017;7:064012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.064012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pirro P, et al. Non-Gilbert-damping mechanism in a ferromagnetic heusler compound probed by nonlinear spin dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:227601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.227601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gabor MS, Nasui M, Timar-Gabor A. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pt/Co-based full Heusler alloy/MgO thin-film structures. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2019;100:144438. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun M, et al. Buffer-layer dependence of interface magnetic anisotropy in Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy ultrathin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2017;53:1–4. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2018.2792846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wen Z, et al. Voltage control of magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial Ru/CoFeAl/MgO heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45026. doi: 10.1038/srep45026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kubota T, et al. Interface magnetic anisotropy of Pd/Co2FexMn1−xSi/MgO layered structures. Mater. Trans. 2016;57:773–776. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.ME201505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gueye M, et al. Bending strain-tunable magnetic anisotropy in Co 2 FeAl Heusler thin film on Kapton ®. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:062409. doi: 10.1063/1.4893157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Belmeguenai M, et al. Annealing temperature and thickness dependencies of structural and magnetic properties of Co 2 FeAl thin films. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2016;94:104424. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.104424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhou C, Dunzhu G, Yao J, Jiang C. Piezostrain control of magnetic anisotropy in Co2FeAl/Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–30%PbTiO3 heterostructure. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;710:680–684. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhang B, et al. Control of magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial Co 2 MnAl thin films through piezo-voltage-induced strain. J. Appl. Phys. 2019;125:082503. doi: 10.1063/1.5039430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pandey H, et al. Magnetoelastic coupling induced magnetic anisotropy in Co 2 (Fe/Mn)Si thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;104:022402. doi: 10.1063/1.4861777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Weiler M, et al. Elastically driven ferromagnetic resonance in nickel thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:117601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.117601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Uchida K, et al. Long-range spin Seebeck effect and acoustic spin pumping. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:737–741. doi: 10.1038/nmat3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gowtham PG, Moriyama T, Ralph DC, Buhrman RA. Traveling surface spin-wave resonance spectroscopy using surface acoustic waves. J. Appl. Phys. 2015;118:233910. doi: 10.1063/1.4938390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wei M, et al. Organic multiferroic magnetoelastic complexes. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:e2003293. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu M, Sun NX. Voltage control of magnetism in multiferroic heterostructures. Philos. Trans. A. 2014;372:20120439. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Emori S, et al. Coexistence of low damping and strong magnetoelastic coupling in epitaxial spinel ferrite thin films. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1–10. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Endo Y, et al. Study on measurement technique for magnetization dynamics of thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018;112:252403. doi: 10.1063/1.5032305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Endo Y, Mitsuzuka Y, Shimada Y, Yamaguchi M. Influence of magnetostriction on damping constant of Ni x Fe 1–x film with various Ni concentrations (x) J. Appl. Phys. 2011;109:07D336. doi: 10.1063/1.3560905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bonin R, Schneider ML, Silva TJ, Nibarger JP. Dependence of magnetization dynamics on magnetostriction in NiFe alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;98:123904. doi: 10.1063/1.2143121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chumak OM, et al. Magnetoelastic properties of epitaxially grown Co 2 Fe 0.4 Mn 0.6 Si and Co 2 FeGa 0.5 Ge 0.5 Heusler alloys thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2017;53:1–6. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2017.2700790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Henning JCM, den Boef JH. Magnetostriction measurement by means of strain modulated ferromagnetic resonance (SMFMR) Appl. Phys. 1978;16:353–357. doi: 10.1007/BF00885859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nesteruk K, Żuberek R, Piechota S, Gutowski MW, Szymczak H. Thin film’s magnetostriction investigated by strain modulated ferromagnetic resonance at low temperature. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2014;25:075502. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/25/7/075502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pan S, Mondal S, Seki T, Takanashi K, Barman A. Influence of thickness-dependent structural evolution on ultrafast magnetization dynamics in Co2 Fe0.4 Mn 0.6 Si Heusler alloy thin films. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2016;94:184417. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Klingler S, et al. Gilbert damping of magnetostatic modes in a yttrium iron garnet sphere. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017;110:092409. doi: 10.1063/1.4977423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Akansel S, et al. Thickness-dependent enhancement of damping in Co2FeAl/β-Ta thin films. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2018;97:134421. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.134421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Qiu JJ, et al. Structural and magnetoresistive properties of magnetic tunnel junctions with half-metallic Co2MnAl. J. Appl. Phys. 2008;103:07A903. doi: 10.1063/1.2830554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wu S-C, Fecher GH, Shahab Naghavi S, Felser C. Elastic properties and stability of Heusler compounds: Cubic Co2YZ compounds with L21 structure. J. Appl. Phys. 2019;125:082523. doi: 10.1063/1.5054398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Néel L. Anisotropie magnétique superficielle et surstructures d’orientation. J. Phys. Radium. 1954;15:225–239. doi: 10.1051/jphysrad:01954001504022500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Szymczak, H., et al. Interfacial effects in multilayer Ni-C and Ni-Ag films. in 12th International Colloquium on Magnetic Films and Surfaces Th3–03 (1988).
  • 90.Sun SW, O’Handley RC. Surface magnetoelastic coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991;66:2798–2801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Żuberek R, Fronc K, Szewczyk A, Szymczak H. FMR and SMFMR investigation of epitaxial Fe/GaAs(0 0 1) thin films with Si and Ge overlayer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2003;260:386–392. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)01367-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Żuberek R, Fronc K, Paszkowicz W, Szymczak H. Magnetic anisotropy and magnetoelastic constants of ultrathin Fe/GaAs(0 0 1) films sputtered in hydrogen atmosphere. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004;283:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Serrate D, De Teresa JM, Córdoba R, Yusuf SM. Magnetoresistance and magnetostriction of Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al Heusler alloy. Solid State Commun. 2007;142:363–367. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.02.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mahfouzi F, Carman GP, Kioussis N. Magnetoelastic and magnetostrictive properties of Co2Al Heusler compounds. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2020;102:094401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.094401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Szymczak H. Surface magnetoelastic behavior of magnetic multilayers (invited) J. Appl. Phys. 1997;81:5411. doi: 10.1063/1.364945. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhu W, et al. Thickness dependent structural ordering and magnetic properties of Co2FeSi films with or without a Cr buffer layer. J. Phys. D. 2019;52:355005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab2800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Peria WK, et al. Interplay of large two-magnon ferromagnetic resonance linewidths and low Gilbert damping in Heusler thin films. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2020;101:134430. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.134430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mizukami S, et al. Low damping constant for Co2FeAl Heusler alloy films and its correlation with density of states. J. Appl. Phys. 2009;105:07D306. doi: 10.1063/1.3067607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Woltersdorf G, Heinrich B. Two-magnon scattering in a self-assembled nanoscale network of misfit dislocations. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2004;69:184417. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tserkovnyak Y, Brataas A, Bauer GEW. Enhanced gilbert damping in thin ferromagnetic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;88:117601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.117601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vittoria C, Yoon SD, Widom A. Relaxation mechanism for ordered magnetic materials. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2010;81:014412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Rossi E, Heinonen OG, MacDonald AH. Dynamics of magnetization coupled to a thermal bath of elastic modes. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. 2005;72:174412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.174412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987;59:381–384. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data reported in this manuscript is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES