Abstract
In people with multiple sclerosis (MS), the spinal cord is the structure most commonly affected by clinically detectable pathology at presentation, and a key part of the central nervous system involved in chronic disease deterioration. Indices, such as the spinal cord cross‐sectional area at the level C2 have been developed as tools to predict future disability, and—by inference—axonal loss. However, this and other histo‐pathological correlates of spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in MS remain incompletely understood. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in developing quantitative MRI tools to measure specific tissue features, including axonal density, myelin content, neurite density, and orientation, among others, with an emphasis on the spinal cord. Quantitative MRI techniques including T1 and T2, magnetization transfer and a number of diffusion‐derived indices have all been applied to MS spinal cord. Particularly diffusion‐based MRI techniques combined with microscopic resolution achievable using high magnetic field scanners enable a new level of anatomical detail and quantification of indices that are clinically meaningful.
Keywords: axonal loss, cross‐sectional area, diffusion, gray matter, spinal cord, magnetization transfer, MRI, MR microscopy, multiple sclerosis, white matter
Introduction
In multiple sclerosis (MS), it is the spinal cord that is most commonly affected by clinically detectable pathology at presentation 36, 51. Lesions in the spinal cord suggestive of demyelination have been shown to predict a definitive diagnosis of MS in patients with radiologically isolated, as well as clinically isolated, syndromes 1, 54, and more severe disability 1, 9. And as MS evolves over time, much of the permanent and deteriorating disability in people with MS affects lower body functions, including lack of sphincter control, sexual dysfunction, and impaired leg movement and coordination, resembling the clinical syndrome of progressive myelopathy 27, 37, 40, 46.
It is therefore not surprising that the pathological manifestations of MS in the spinal cord have attracted renewed interest, including attempts to better visualize and quantify histological changes non‐invasively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Combining MRI with (quantitative) histology enables investigation of fundamental associations between tissue features with clinical relevance, such as the gray and white matters 61, and the cell types affected by disease, including the degree of tissue loss measured using volumetric MRI 43, and the microscopic changes underlying this loss. Evidence suggests results obtained using brain samples cannot be directly translated to the spinal cord 47.
In this paper, we will review the pathological features of MS currently detectable on MRI of the spinal cord, with an emphasis on neuro‐axonal loss, and on studies correlating MRI with histology. Recent pathological findings spell the need for further research into the spinal cord network and its destruction by MS. This work builds and expands on a recent topical review 62.
MS lesions in the spinal cord
After it had been recognized by the early 1980s that MRI exceeds the sensitivity of computed tomography not only of the brain 77 but also of the spinal cord in detecting parenchymal lesions 20, the first study directly correlating T2 weighted (T2W) MRI with MS lesions was published in 1994 when the case of a woman who died of MS at the age of 37 was reported, and imaging appearance correlated with histology 52. A series of 59 spinal cord samples from 19 cases of MS and three controls were subsequently investigated using proton density (PD) weighted MRI at two different field strengths (1 and 4.7 Tesla) 53. Correlation of MRI with histology in a proportion of the cases examined confirmed excellent visual match between lesions detected using histology and MRI at either field strength. Importantly, scans acquired at 4.7 T additionally revealed a distinction between clearly demarcated lesions and rather diffuse changes, suggesting Wallerian (or retrograde) degeneration as a result of axonal transection in lesions 19, 72, 53.
Gilmore and co‐workers were the first to shift the focus of correlative MRI‐pathology studies on lesions affecting the spinal cord gray matter 26. Using a 4.7 T scanner, PD MRI was acquired in cord samples of 11 persons with MS (pwMS) and two controls. Following MRI acquisition, samples were dissected and immuno‐stained for myelin basic protein. N= 40 “white matter only” lesions, 55 mixed (white/gray matter) lesions, and one “grey matter only” lesion were detected on PD MRI. Separating white and gray matter proportions of mixed lesions, 87% of histologically confirmed areas of white matter, and 73% of gray matter demyelination were detected using MRI, i.e. significantly more than in the neocortex 24, where partial volume effects, among others, adversely affect their detection 26, 63.
Axonal loss in lesions and beyond
Significant axonal loss takes place in the MS spinal cord, degree of which appears most strongly associated with the duration of the disease. A recent study reported reduction of axonal density in the cortico‐spinal tracts by 57%–62% across all cord levels after a mean disease duration of 29 years 55, confirming earlier studies using tissue from pwMS with similar disease duration 5, 69, while studies of material with shorter disease duration reported less pronounced axonal loss 16, 22. In line with this observation, axonal loss [be it within or beyond the margins of MS lesions 5, 19] is considered a major contributor to the relentless accrual of disability in pwMS over time.
Separating the effects on MRI indices of inflammation and demyelination on the one hand, and axonal damage and loss on the other hand, remains challenging. While in 2001 Nijeholt and co‐workers highlighted the close relationship between areas of high signal on T2W MRI with the extent of demyelination 53, a subsequent study by the same group described considerable T2W MRI signal abnormalities in cord tissue not affected by lesions (non‐lesional cord tissue) yet significant—and seemingly lesion‐independent—axonal loss 4. Of note, the authors did not control for remote effects on axonal loss of lesions along the pathway examined, which have been shown to be of importance when examining the relationship between inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss 55.
Magnetization transfer
Given the nonspecific nature of PD and T2 weighted MRI, a range of quantitative MR techniques including magnetization transfer (MT) 41, diffusion 13, 68, and spectroscopic metabolite concentration (albeit not in postmortem samples) have been used to try and improve detection and quantification of microstructural changes in the MS spinal cord 23. MT is a process by which macromolecular protons (eg, in myelin bi‐phospholipid layers) and water protons (eg, in cerebro‐spinal fluid) exchange magnetization when exposed to an external magnetic field and a radio frequency saturation pulse. Changes in MT can be quantified and enable inferences about the underlying macromolecular content and structure 71.
A number of MT indices has been explored in post‐mortem MS brain 3, 64, 66, 74, where they were shown to be primarily associated with myelin, though inflammation, edema 73, and—particularly in NLSC—axonal loss 57 also contribute. The strong association of MT, as well as T1 and T2 relaxation times, with myelin was confirmed in a study by Bot and co‐workers on cervical spinal cord 7; and similar results were reported by Mottershead and co‐workers in their study of spinal cord specimens employing a small bore high magnetic field (7 T) scanner 50. The latter study also highlighted an important issue when trying to separate MRI indices for axonal density and myelin content: that these tissue features themselves are quite strongly correlated (here, r = 0.67, p < 0.0001) 50.
Diffusion
The strong association between changes in myelin and axons in a demyelinating disease like MS was also an important challenge for experiments using diffusion MRI. Work in animal models suggested the assessment of the directionality of diffusion (axial, radial) might enable more reliable noninvasive quantification of myelin versus axonal damage and loss in the CNS 67. However, the apparently clear separation in the model proved difficult to reproduce in the human disease MS. Klawiter and coworkers applied Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) to post‐mortem spinal cord from nine pwMS and five control subjects using a 4.7 T system 39. They placed regions of interest in areas semi‐quantitatively graded as normally myelinated, mildly (<50%), and moderate‐severely (>50%) demyelinated. Increasing radial diffusion (Drad) values were associated with the degree of demyelination but so was the extent of axonal loss, while axial diffusion (Dax), radial diffusivity, and relative anisotropy did not predict axonal density in isolation. Analysis of myelin and axonal count simultaneously indicated that both tissue features contributed independently to changes in radial diffusivity, relative anisotropy, and mean diffusivity 39. The study by Mottershead and co‐workers using a 7 TMRI system also reported diffusion data. The “diffusion standard deviation index” (SDI), a measure of anisotropy, was calculated after images had been acquired at two different diffusion gradient strengths. Moderate correlation emerged between the SDI and axonal count (r= 0.61, p < 0.001) as well as myelin content (r = 0.51, p < 0.001).
Since single diffusion tensor models did not reliably enabled extraction of indices specific to axonal damage and loss, more complex setups have recently combined multiple diffusion tensors for this purpose, such as diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) 76. DBSI models myelinated and unmyelinated axons as anisotropic diffusion tensors, and cells and edema/extracellular space as isotropic diffusion tensors. Quantitative histological analysis of post‐mortem MS cervical spinal cord specimens (n = 3) suggested that DBSI‐determined indices of cellularity, axons, and myelin acquired on a small bore 4.7 T magnet are closely associated with those pathologies identified and quantified by conventional histology 75.
Another promising diffusion‐based attempt at increasing specificity for tissue components and their injury by MS is neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) 34, 78. An index of orientation dispersion is defined to characterize the angular variation of neurites. NODDI has been used both in vivo as well as for validation experiments on spinal cord samples including MS and control tissue 30. Strong correlation was detected between a quantitative histology index defined as “circular variance” (CV) and the NODDI derived variable “orientation dispersion index” (ODI), suggesting ODI may provide a noninvasive marker of CV 31. Comparison with more conventional DTI metrics, such as mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, Dax and Drad suggest NODDI may indeed provide more precise estimates of the complexity of dendrites and axons 30.
The envelope of non‐invasive visualization and quantification of spinal cord pathology has recently been pushed further by successful acquisition of 3D anatomic image data (50‐μm isotropic resolution) alongside 100‐μm isotropic resolution diffusion data of an entire spinal cord 10 (Figure 1). This was made possible by a multi‐segment acquisition lasting 280 h, and automated image segment composition. The ability to acquire such datasets provides a platform for spinal cord lesion detection, automated volumetric gray matter segmentation, and quantitative spinal cord morphometry including estimates of cross sectional dimensions and gray matter fraction throughout the length of the cord (Figure 2) 10.
Figure 1.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of an entire human spinal cord at the level of the central canal using a 7 Tesla small bore MR system. Techniques used included T2* weighted gradient echo A. diffusion‐weighted MRI. B. The colored image C. represents a map of fractional anisotropy (directionality) derived from diffusion weighted imaging. Reproduced with permisson from 10.
Figure 2.
Multi‐contrast axial magnetic resonance images of a human spinal cord at different levels. Contrasts include: T2*, T2* weighted gradient echo; B0, b = 0 image from diffusion acquisition; DWI, isotropic diffusion weighted image; FA, fractional anisotropy; FAC, directionally colored fractional anisotropy. Reproduced with permisson from 10.
The novel techniques outlined above, including high resolution MR microscopy 10, DBSI 75, 76 and NODDI are likely to offer advantages in terms of tissue specificity which, in the case of NODDI, notably include indices to assess spinal cord gray matter 30, 32, 78. If preliminary reports can be confirmed, and reproducibility further improved 18, 32, these techniques may offer significant steps in the quest for accurate in vivo assessment of spinal cord pathology in MS, perhaps in combination with other techniques, such as MT or multi‐component relaxometry 18. It is encouraging that several initiatives to improve the standardization of spinal cord MRI analysis have gone underway that will likely facilitate MRI‐pathology studies yet further thereby enabling more rapid validation of new techniques in the future 14, 29.
Spinal cord cross‐sectional area as a proxy of axonal loss?
While the quantification of tissue “microstructure” using quantitative MRI is of significant interest to potentially better understand the pathophysiology of MS in the spinal cord, none of the above mentioned techniques have entered the realm of clinical trials, let alone clinical practice, where the detection of lesions using conventional MRI techniques continues to dominate. However, limitations in (i) the association between demyelinating lesions and axonal loss and (ii) lesion detection in the MS spinal cord due to technical artifacts, have highlighted the need for alternative indices with potential to be robust predictors of axonal damage and loss.
Since the seminal study by Losseff and co‐workers 43 more than 20 years ago, numerous clinical studies underpinned the correlation between a reduction of the spinal cord cross‐sectional area (CSA) and disability 2, 37, 43. CSA loss has also been applied as an outcome in a small number of clinical trials 35, 58, and various methods have been used to measure it including semi‐automated edge finding 42, edge detection with partial volume corrections 70, voxelwise mapping 59, an active surface model 38, and semi‐automated cord volume estimation techniques 45.
Based on experimental data, CSA loss—and its association with clinical disease progression—has long been considered as a key substrate of axonal degeneration. However, recent data suggest the macro‐/microscopic relationship between CSA and nerve fiber loss is not as straightforward 55.
Following preliminary work on a small number of specimens by Bjartmar and co‐workers 5, a recent study comprehensively sampled spinal cords of 13 pwMS with a mean disease duration of 29 years, and five healthy controls to assess the association between axonal density and CSA. Using just under of 400 tissue blocks a reduction of the CSA of 19%–24% was detected at all (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) levels with white and gray matter areas contributing equally across levels. However, compared to controls axonal density was reduced by 57%–62%. And while disease duration was a predictor of reduced axonal density, CSA was not, and neither were separate indices of proportional gray or white matter area 55.
This surprising lack of correlation evidently challenges the concept of CSA shrinkage being a predictor of axonal loss, and other factors had to be considered, including “space filling” through gliosis, since this would be expected to counteract the area reducing effect of axonal loss 5, 33. Since both gray and white matter contributed equally to the reduction of CSA, it is unlikely that long tract systems (cortico‐spinal, dorsal ascending, and others) are exclusively contributing to the sum total CSA change. In line with this finding, it is has been suggested that neuronal shrinkage and loss, and a reduction in neurite orientation dispersion 30 may contribute to both disability and loss of CSA 26, 60. Finally, based on synaptophysin immuno‐staining, a substantial loss of synapses has recently been reported affecting both non‐lesional and lesional cord gray matter. This loss was associated with gray matter area shrinkage 56. Some (or all) of these results may also explain that reported associations between CSA and disability have in a number of recent studies been rather moderate 2, 61.
Improving the noninvasive prediction of tissue changes in MS—is MR microscopy realistic?
The pathology of MS is complex, and its etiology and pathogenesis on the microstructural level remain incompletely understood. It is, thus, not surprising that attempts at MRI quantification of specific tissue features (axons, myelination status, microglial activation, gliosis, etc) are challenging.
Until quite recently, key MRI‐pathology studies of the spinal cord made hardly any reference to the gray matter which, similar to its importance in the brain 12, is a likely key factor for the clinical manifestations of MS. Long spinal cord white matter tract systems, such as the cortico‐spinal and the dorsal ascending (sensory) tract systems, with their largely longitudinal orientation are obviously ideal candidates to model new techniques including attempts at measuring the g‐ratio in vivo 11, 18, 68. However, when looking at MS as a disease, and the need for pwMS, their health care professionals and scientists to better understand and manage their condition, it is important to consider the spinal cord as a functional network with millions of perpendicular connections that are damaged in MS and impact on function 8, 31, 56.
Given the importance of immune‐mediated demyelination for the degree of axonal loss throughout MS 48, 55, there is an ongoing need for further improved techniques to detect lesions across the length of the spinal cord, to be used as outcomes in trials of new compounds for the clinical management of pwMS 28. This is particularly true against the backdrop of the poor prediction of disability based on lesions detected using conventional MRI techniques 15.
The recently developed toolboxes for both improved MRI and pathology measurement of spinal cord pathology provide exciting new opportunities to integrate the complexity of MS pathophysiology. The techniques used have come a long way including new standardized methods to map spinal cord MRI onto histology (and vice versa). In post‐mortem studies of the MS brain, this problem has been recognized for some time 49, and various techniques were subsequently developed to improve registration, including use of a stereotaxic frame 6, 65, imaging the unfixed brain in situ with subsequent rescanning of the fixed tissue and use of customized cutting panels 6, 21, and most recently, the introduction of individually manufactured cutting panels using 3D printing technology 44.
Compared to the brain, the spinal cord appears like a less challenging structure to match MRI with histology. However, the recently published systematic framework for histological quantification 31 combined with landmark‐guided co‐registration and high‐resolution imaging 10 provide insights into how complex (and successful), new approaches to correlative MRI‐pathology studies of post‐mortem spinal cord can be 30, against the backdrop of a much stronger emphasis on histological quantification (optical density indices, stereology, orientation dispersion, etc.) 12, 31, 64, over and above established qualitative indices 4.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to the contents of this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Natalia Petrova, Amy McDowell, and Daniele Carassiti for the original work we refer to in this paper, Francesco Scaravilli for expert neuropathology support, Richard Reynolds, Djordje Gveric, and the team of the Multiple Sclerosis Society's UK MS Tissue Bank based at Imperial College London for supplying tissue, and Barts Charity for funding support (grants # 468/1506 & G‐001109).
References
- 1. Arrambide G, Rovira A, Sastre‐Garriga J, Tur C, Castilló J, Río J, et al (2018) Spinal cord lesions: a modest contributor to diagnosis in clinically isolated syndromes but a relevant prognostic factor. Mult Scler 24:301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Aymerich FX, Auger C, Alonso J, Alberich M, Sastre‐Garriga J, Tintoré M et al (2018) Cervical Cord Atrophy and Long‐Term Disease Progression in Patients with Primary‐Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am. J Neuroradiol 39:399–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Barkhof F, Bruck W, De Groot CJA, Bergers E, Hulshof S, Geurts J et al (2003) Remyelinated lesions in multiple sclerosis: magnetic resonance image appearance. Arch Neurol 60:1073–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bergers E, Bot JCJ, De Groot CJA, Polman CH, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, Castelijns JA et al (2002) Axonal damage in the spinal cord of MS patients occurs largely independent of T2 MRI lesions. Neurology 59:1766–1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bjartmar C, Kidd G, Mörk S, Rudick R, Trapp BD (2000) Neurological disability correlates with spinal cord axonal loss and reduced N‐acetyl aspartate in chronic multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 48:893–901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bö L, Geurts J, Ravid R, Barkhof F (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to examine the neuropathology of multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 30:106–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bot JCJ, Blezer ELA, Kamphorst W, Lycklama A, Nijeholt GJ, Ader HJ, Castelijns JA et al (2004) The spinal cord in multiple sclerosis: relationship of high‐spatial‐resolution quantitative MR imaging findings to histopathologic results. Radiology 233:531–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bourane S, Grossmann KS, Britz O, Dalet A, Del Barrio MG, Stam FJ et al (2015) Identification of a spinal circuit for light touch and fine motor control. Cell 160:503–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brownlee WJ, Altmann DR, Alves Da Mota P, Swanton JK, Miszkiel KA, Wheeler‐Kingshott CG et al (2017) Association of asymptomatic spinal cord lesions and atrophy with disability 5 years after a clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler 23:665–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Calabrese E, Adil SM, Cofer G, Perone CS, Cohen‐Adad J, Lad SP et al (2018) Postmortem diffusion MRI of the entire human spinal cord at microscopic resolution. Neuroimage Clin 18:963–971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Campbell JSW, Leppert IR, Narayanan S, Boudreau M, Duval T, Cohen‐Adad J et al (2017) Promise and pitfalls of g‐ratio estimation with MRI [Internet]. Neuroimage Available at: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Carassiti D, Altmann DR, Petrova N, Pakkenberg B, Scaravilli F, Schmierer K (2018) Neuronal loss, demyelination and volume change in the multiple sclerosis neocortex [Internet]. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 44:377–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cohen Y, Anaby D, Morozov D (2017) Diffusion MRI of the spinal cord: from structural studies to pathology [Internet]. NMR Biomed 30. Available at: 10.1002/nbm.3592.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. De Leener B, Lévy S, Dupont SM, Fonov VS, Stikov N, Louis Collins D et al (2017) SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open‐source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 145:24–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dekker I, Sombekke MH, Witte BI, Geurts JJ, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag BM et al (2018) Asymptomatic spinal cord lesions do not predict the time to disability in patients with early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 24:481–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. DeLuca GC, Ebers GC, Esiri MM (2004) Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis: a pathological survey of the corticospinal and sensory tracts. Brain 127:1009–1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Duval T, Lévy S, Stikov N, Campbell J, Mezer A, Witzel T et al (2017a) g‐Ratio weighted imaging of the human spinal cord in vivo . Neuroimage 145:11–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Duval T, Smith V, Stikov N, Klawiter EC, Cohen‐Adad J (2017b) Scan‐rescan of axcaliber, macromolecular tissue volume, and g‐ratio in the spinal cord [Internet]. Magn Reson Med Available at: 10.1002/mrm.26945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dziedzic T, Metz I, Dallenga T, König FB, Müller S, Stadelmann C et al (2010) Wallerian degeneration: a major component of early axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 20:976–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Earnest F 4th, Baker HL Jr, Kispert DB, Laws ER Jr (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography: advantages and disadvantages. Clin Neurosurg 32:540–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fisher E, Chang A, Fox RJ, Tkach JA, Svarovsky T, Nakamura K et al (2007) Imaging correlates of axonal swelling in chronic multiple sclerosis brains. Ann Neurol 62:219–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ganter P, Prince C, Esiri MM (1999) Spinal cord axonal loss in multiple sclerosis: a post‐mortem study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 25:459–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gass A, Rocca MA, Agosta F, Ciccarelli O, Chard D, Valsasina P et al (2015) MRI monitoring of pathological changes in the spinal cord in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 14:443–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Geurts JJG, Roosendaal SD, Calabrese M, Ciccarelli O, Agosta F, Chard DT et al (2011) Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology 76:418–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gilmore CP, DeLuca GC, Bö L, Owens T, Lowe J, Esiri MM et al (2009b) Spinal cord neuronal pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 19:642–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gilmore CP, Geurts JJG, Evangelou N, Bot JCJ, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJW et al (2009a) Spinal cord grey matter lesions in multiple sclerosis detected by post‐mortem high field MR imaging. Mult Scler 15:180–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Giovannoni G, Cutter G, Pia‐Sormani M, Belachew S, Hyde R, Koendgen H et al (2017) Is multiple sclerosis a length‐dependent central axonopathy? The case for therapeutic lag and the asynchronous progressive MS hypotheses. Mult Scler Relat Disord 12:70–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M (2015) Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord 4:329–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Grussu F (n.d.) StructureTensorToolbox [Internet]. Github; [cited 2017 Dec 31] Available at: https://github.com/fragrussu/StructureTensorToolbox. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Grussu F, Schneider T, Tur C, Yates RL, Tachrount M, Ianuş A et al (2017) Neurite dispersion: a new marker of multiple sclerosis spinal cord pathology? Ann Clin Transl Neurol 4:663–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Grussu F, Schneider T, Yates RL, Zhang H, Wheeler‐Kingshott CAMG, DeLuca GC et al (2016) A framework for optimal whole‐sample histological quantification of neurite orientation dispersion in the human spinal cord. J Neurosci Methods 273:20–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Grussu F, Schneider T, Zhang H, Alexander DC, Wheeler‐Kingshott CAM (2015) Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the healthy cervical spinal cord in vivo . Neuroimage 111:590–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hampton DW, Serio A, Pryce G, Al‐Izki S, Franklin RJ, Giovannoni G et al (2013) Neurodegeneration progresses despite complete elimination of clinical relapses in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 1:84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Jespersen SN, Leigland LA, Cornea A, Kroenke CD (2012) Determination of axonal and dendritic orientation distributions within the developing cerebral cortex by diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31:16–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kapoor R, Furby J, Hayton T, Smith KJ, Altmann DR, Brenner R et al (2010) Lamotrigine for neuroprotection in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial. Lancet Neurol 9:681–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Katz Sand I (2015) Classification, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 28:193–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kearney H, Miller DH, Ciccarelli O (2015) Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis [mdash] diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value. Nat Rev Neurol 11:327–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kearney H, Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Balk L, Sastre‐Garriga J, Reinhardt J et al (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging correlates of physical disability in relapse onset multiple sclerosis of long disease duration. Mult Scler 20:72–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Klawiter EC, Schmidt RE, Trinkaus K, Liang H‐F, Budde MD, Naismith RT et al (2011) Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords. Neuroimage 55:1454–1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kremenchutzky M, Rice GPA, Baskerville J, Wingerchuk DM, Ebers GC (2006) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: observations on the progressive phase of the disease. Brain 129:584–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lema A, Bishop C, Malik O, Mattoscio M, Ali R, Nicholas R et al (2017) A comparison of magnetization transfer methods to assess brain and cervical cord microstructure in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 27:221–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lin X, Tench CR, Turner B, Blumhardt LD, Constantinescu CS (2003) Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis over four years: application of a reproducible automated technique in monitoring disease progression in a cohort of the interferon β‐1a (Rebif) treatment trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1090–1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Losseff NA, Webb SL, O'Riordan JI, Page R, Wang L, Barker GJ et al (1996) Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 119(Pt 3):701–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Luciano NJ, Sati P, Nair G, Guy JR, Ha S‐K, Absinta M et al (2016) Utilizing 3D printing technology to merge MRI with histology: a protocol for brain sectioning [Internet]. J Vis Exp Available at: 10.3791/54780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lukas C, Knol DL, Sombekke MH, Bellenberg B, Hahn HK, Popescu V et al (2015)Cervical spinal cord volume loss is related to clinical disability progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86:410–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. McDonald I, Compston A (2006) The symptoms and signs of multiple sclerosis. McAlpine's Multiple Sclerosis 4:321–322. [Google Scholar]
- 47. McDowell A, Miquel ME, Papachatzaki M, Carassiti D, Schmierer K (2014)(ISMRM 2014) Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery in Post Mortem Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cord: Shades of Grey and White [Internet]. [cited 2017 Sep 12] Available at: http://dev.ismrm.org/2014/1732.html. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar‐Or A, Comi G et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:209–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Moore GR, Leung E, MacKay AL, Vavasour IM, Whittall KP, Cover KS et al (2000) A pathology‐MRI study of the short‐T2 component in formalin‐fixed multiple sclerosis brain. Neurology 55:1506–1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mottershead JP, Schmierer K, Clemence M, Thornton JS, Scaravilli F, Barker GJ et al (2003) High field MRI correlates of myelin content and axonal density in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 250:1293–1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mowry EM, Pesic M, Grimes B, Deen S, Bacchetti P, Waubant E (2009) Demyelinating events in early multiple sclerosis have inherent severity and recovery. Neurology 72:602–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Nagao M, Ogawa M, Yamauchi H (1994) Postmortem MRI of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 36:625–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Nijeholt GJL à., Bergers E, Kamphorst W, Bot J, Nicolay K, Castelijns JA et al (2001) Post‐mortem high‐resolution MRI of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosisA correlative study with conventional MRI, histopathology and clinical phenotype. Brain 124:154–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Cree BAC, Crabtree EC, Goodin DS, Waubant E et al (2011) Asymptomatic spinal cord lesions predict disease progression in radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 76:686–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Petrova N, Carassiti D, Altmann DR, Baker D, Schmierer K (2018) Axonal loss in the multiple sclerosis spinal cord revisited [Internet]. Brain Pathol 28:334–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Petrova N, Carassiti D, Scaravilli F, Baker D, Schmierer K (2016) Synaptic loss in the MS spinal cord: a key driver of disease progression? [Internet] SAGE Publications; Available at: https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/25227/Synaptic_pathology_abstact_NP_FS_KSv2.docx?sequence=1. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Petzold A, Tozer DJ, Schmierer K (2011) Axonal damage in the making: neurofilament phosphorylation, proton mobility and magnetisation transfer in multiple sclerosis normal appearing white matter. Exp Neurol 232:234–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Rice CM, Marks DI, Ben‐Shlomo Y, Evangelou N, Morgan PS, Metcalfe C et al (2015) Assessment of bone marrow‐derived Cellular Therapy in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (ACTiMuS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 16:463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Damjanovic D, Horsfield MA, Mesaros S, Stosic‐Opincal T et al (2013) Voxel‐wise mapping of cervical cord damage in multiple sclerosis patients with different clinical phenotypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Schirmer L, Albert M, Buss A, Schulz‐Schaeffer WJ, Antel JP, Brück W et al (2009) Substantial early, but nonprogressive neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis (MS) spinal cord. Ann Neurol 66:698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Schlaeger R, Papinutto N, Panara V, Bevan C, Lobach IV, Bucci M et al (2014) Spinal cord gray matter atrophy correlates with multiple sclerosis disability. Ann Neurol 76:568–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Schmierer K, McDowell A, Petrova N, Carassiti D, Thomas DL, Miquel ME (2018) Quantifying multiple sclerosis pathology in post mortem spinal cord using MRI [Internet]. Neuroimage. Available at: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Schmierer K, Parkes HG, So P‐W, An SF, Brandner S, Ordidge RJ et al (2010) High field (9.4 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of cortical grey matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain 133:858–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Schmierer K, Scaravilli F, Altmann DR, Barker GJ, Miller DH (2004) Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol 56:407–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Schmierer K, Scaravilli F, Barker GJ, Gordon R, MacManus DG, Miller DH (2003) Stereotactic co‐registration of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology in post‐mortem multiple sclerosis brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 29:596–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Schmierer K, Tozer DJ, Scaravilli F, Altmann DR, Barker GJ, Tofts PS et al (2007) Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:41–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Song S‐K, Yoshino J, Le TQ, Lin S‐J, Sun S‐W, Cross AH et al (2005) Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 26:132–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Stikov N, Campbell JSW, Stroh T, Lavelée M, Frey S, Novek J et al (2015) In vivo histology of the myelin g‐ratio with magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 118:397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Tallantyre EC, Bø L, Al‐Rawashdeh O, Owens T, Polman CH, Lowe J et al (2009) Greater loss of axons in primary progressive multiple sclerosis plaques compared to secondary progressive disease. Brain 132:1190–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Tench CR, Morgan PS, Constantinescu CS (2005) Measurement of cervical spinal cord cross‐sectional area by MRI using edge detection and partial volume correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Tozer D, Ramani A, Barker GJ, Davies GR, Miller DH, Tofts PS (2003) Quantitative magnetization transfer mapping of bound protons in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 50:83–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mörk S, Bö L (1998) Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 338:278–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Vavasour IM, Laule C, Li DKB, Traboulsee AL, MacKay AL (2011) Is the magnetization transfer ratio a marker for myelin in multiple sclerosis? J Magn Reson Imaging 33:713–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. van Waesberghe JH, Kamphorst W, De Groot CJ, van Walderveen MA, Castelijns JA, Ravid R et al (1999) Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability. Ann Neurol 46:747–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang Y, Sun P, Wang Q, Trinkaus K, Schmidt RE, Naismith RT et al (2015) Differentiation and quantification of inflammation, demyelination and axon injury or loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138:1223–1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wang Y, Wang Q, Haldar JP, Yeh F‐C, Xie M, Sun P et al (2011) Quantification of increased cellularity during inflammatory demyelination. Brain 134:3590–3601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Young IR, Hall AS, Pallis CA, Legg NJ, Bydder GM, Steiner RE (1981) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2:1063–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler‐Kingshott CA, Alexander DC (2012) NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 61:1000–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]