Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is neuropathologically characterized by neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Progression of both plaques and tangles throughout the brain follows a hierarchical distribution which is defined by intrinsic cytoarchitectonic features and extrinsic connectivity patterns. What has less well been studied is how cortical convolutions influence the distribution of AD pathology. Here, the distribution of both plaques and tangles within subsulcal gyral components (fundi) to components forming their top regions at the subarachnoidal brain surface (crowns) by stereological methods in seven different cortical areas was systematically compared. Further, principle differences in cytoarchitectonic organization of cortical crowns and fundi that might provide the background for regionally selective vulnerability were attempted to identify. It was shown that both plaques and tangles were more prominent in sulcal fundi than gyri crowns. The differential distribution of pathology along convolutions corresponds to subgyral differences in the vascular network, GFAP‐positive astrocytes and intracortical and subcortical connectivity. While the precise mechanisms accounting for these differences remain open, the presence of systematic inhomogeneities in the distribution of AD pathology along cortical convolutions indicates that the phylogenetic shaping of the cortex is associated with features that render the human brain vulnerable to AD pathology.
Keywords: amyloid plaques, cortical surface, gyrus, neurofibrillary tangles, sulcus
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder, neuropathologically characterized by fibrillar aggregates of the Aß‐peptide and the microtubule‐associated protein tau giving rise to the typical histopathological hallmarks, that is, Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Formation of both lesions, most likely, represents a late stage event in a pathological cascade of progressive conversion from oligomeric toward fibrillary aggregates of Aß and tau, respectively 13, 41, 60, 104. The mechanism of formation and the pathological role of insoluble deposits of Aß and tau in the brain tissue in form of plaques and tangles remain unclear. Still, their density and distribution provides the basis for postmortem diagnosis 76, as well as more recently, for in vivo diagnosis with PET tracers 61, 78.
The progressive formation of both Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles throughout different brain areas is not random but rather follows a hierarchical distribution which is used to define the neuropathological stage of the disease 18, 75, 97. Apparently, both intrinsic cytoarchitectonic features and extrinsic pattern of connectivity shape the distribution of AD pathology throughout the cortex 8, 19, 33, 80, 89. Moreover, it has not escaped the attention of investigators over the last 100 years that histopathological hallmarks of AD are not evenly distributed within the affected cortical fields but rather follow the cortical surface 4, 5, 10, 17, 18, 46, 47, 49, 71, 86, 90, 103.
Systematic differences in the distribution of specific pathological features might provide valuable insights both into disease mechanism and into principles of pathophysiological organization of the cerebral cortex. To further unravel how neuroanatomy shapes neuropathology, we systematically analyzed the distribution of both Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles along cortical convolutions of affected areas. To this end, we compared subsulcal gyral components (fundi) to components forming their top regions at the subarachnoidal brain surface (crowns) by stereological methods. Further, we attempted to identify principle differences in cytoarchitectonic organization of cortical crowns and fundi that might provide the background for selective neuronal vulnerability.
Methods
Brain tissue of 20 AD patients and 20 healthy controls dying without any history of neurological or psychiatric illness was used (Table 1). The diagnosis of AD was made on the basis of both clinical and neuropathological evidence according to the criteria of the International Working Group (IWG) for New Research Criteria for the diagnosis of AD 34, 35 in the revision of 2014 (IWG‐2) 36, the NIA‐AA diagnostic criteria in the revision of 2011 3, 59, 72, 93 and the NIA‐AA guidelines for the neuropathological assessment of AD 57, 76. Only cases with typical AD according to IWG‐2 criteria were included. All cases underwent neuropsychological assessment within the last 6 months prior to their death. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale scoring was based on neuropsychological testing (CERAD) 77, MMSE 42 and rating scales 83. CDR scale score was used to identify patients with mild dementia (CDR 1) 56. All cases were neuropathologically assessed for neurofibrillary tangle stage according to Braak and Braak 18 and Braak et al 16, for Aß/amyloid plaque score according to Thal et al 97 and for neuritic plaque score according to CERAD 75. Neurofibrillary tangles and Aß/amyloid plaques were detected by immunocytochemical labeling of phospho‐tau (anti‐human PHF‐tau monoclonal antibody AT8; Thermo Scientific) and Aß (beta amyloid monoclonal antibody, 6E10; BioLegend), respectively. Severity of AD pathology was scored following the consensus guidelines for the neuropathologic evaluation of AD according to Hyman et al 58 and Montine et al 77. Case recruitment, autopsy and data handling have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments as well as with the convention of the Council of Europe on Human Rights and Biomedicine and had been approved by the responsible Ethics Committee of Leipzig University.
Table 1.
Synopsis of cases.
| Control | AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | 20 | 20 | |
| Gender: male/female | 10/10 | 9/11 | |
| Age in years (±SD) | 81.6 ± 7.6 | 83.2 ± 8.5 | |
| CDR | 0 | 20 | |
| 0.5 | |||
| 1 | 20 | ||
| NFT stage* | 0 | 20 | |
| 1 | |||
| 2 | 7 | ||
| 3 | 13 | ||
| Aß/amyloid plaque score* | 0 | 20 | |
| 1 | 7 | ||
| 2 | 11 | ||
| 3 | 2 | ||
| CERAD* | 0 | 20 | |
| 1 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 10 | ||
| 3 | 2 | ||
| ABC score* | Not | 20 | |
| Low | 4 | ||
| Intermediate | 14 | ||
| High | 2 | ||
| Cause of death | Bronchopneumonia | 5 | 18 |
| Myocardial infarction | 11 | ||
| Embolism of lung | 4 | 2 | |
| Postmortem delay in h (±SD) | 20.6 ± 5.9 | 22.8 ± 6.3 | |
| Fresh brain weight in g (±SD) | 1278 ± 73 | 1216 ± 57 |
*According to Montine et al 76.
Tissue Processing and Stereological Analysis
Brains were immersed in 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.4) for one month. Tissue blocks of the agranular cortex (Brodmann area 8, area frontalis intermedia, Brodmann area 6, area frontalis agranularis), primary visual cortex (Brodmann area 17, area striata), primary sensory association cortex (Brodmann area 7, area parietalis superior; Brodmann area 22 area temporalis superior) and prosisocortex (Brodmann area 11, area prefrontalis; Brodmann area 23 area cingularis posterior ventralis) were paraffin embedded. Corresponding pairs of 5‐µm sections were immunocytochemically processed for phospho‐tau (anti‐human PHF‐tau monoclonal antibody AT8, Thermo Scientific; rabbit‐anti‐phospho‐tau 205, Invitrogen), Aß (beta amyloid monoclonal antibody, 6E10, BioLegend; mouse‐anti‐pE3Aß, Synaptic Systems); NeuN (anti‐neuronal nuclei mouse monoclonal antibody; Millipore; clone 60); GFAP (rabbit anti‐GFAP antibody; DAKO), synaptophysin (rabbit anti‐synaptophysin antibody; DAKO) and rabbit‐anti‐laminin (DAKO). Subsequent sections were Nissl stained with cresyl echt violet. Selected sections were stained by the Klüver–Barrera‐method 68.
The numerical density of objects was determined by the unbiased method of physical dissector 20, 52, 95 as described previously 45. In brief, a distance of 3 µm (h value) was chosen between reference section and look‐up sections. Six pairs of adjacent sections per block were selected randomly according to the method of West 107 for each region. Images were taken using the digital microscope camera AxioCam HRc running on the AxioVision v.4.3 software (both Carl Zeiss Vision) and analyzed subsequently with Adobe Photoshop v.7.0 software (Adobe Systems, Inc.). Objects were counted within superimposed frames of 200 µm × 100 µm placed to the crowns and fundi. Several dissectors were aligned serially, perpendicular to the pial surface, to cover the entire depth of the cortex. Sampling was carried out at three different sites of the maximum curvature of each crown and fundus. On average, 300–600 profiles were counted in each case and region.
Results
Distribution of aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease follows the cortical relief
In all cortical regions investigated (Brodmann's areas 6, 7, 8, 11, 17, 22 and 23) numerical density of Aß plaques in AD was significantly higher in fundi than in crowns (Figures 1 and 2). In some regions (Brodmann's areas 6, 11 and 22) plaque density in fundi was about twice as high as in crowns. Numerical density of neurofibrillary tangles was also significantly higher in fundi than in crowns of gyri (Figures 1 and 2). Differences were in the same order of magnitude as for plaques, that is, for some areas reached about nearly twice the number in fundi compared with crowns.
Figure 1.

Numerical density of Aß plaques (left; beta amyloid mouse monoclonal antibody, 6E10) and neurofibrillary tangles (right; mouse monoclonal antibody AT8) in gyral fundi and crowns of different cortical areas in AD (mean values ± SD; *** P < 0.001; * P < 0.05; Student's t‐test).
Figure 2.

Comparative distribution of Aß plaques, tau pathology and blood vessels in gyral fundi and crowns of the human temporal cortex (Brodmann area 22). Images of Aß (monoclonal mouse‐anti‐pE3Aß antibody) and phospho‐tau (rabbit‐anti‐phospho‐tau 205 antibody) pathology were taken from an AD case, while the distribution of blood vessels (rabbit‐anti‐laminin antibody) is shown for a control brain. Insets in the upper panel are shown below at higher magnification (middle: crowns; bottom: fundi). Scale bars: upper panel 1mm; lower panels 300 µm.
Cytoarchitectonic differences between fundi and crowns of gyri in normal human brain
In an attempt to characterize the background for differences in vulnerability between fundi and crowns, we searched for differences in cytoarchitectonic organization associated with cortical convolutions.
First, we analyzed whether a differential thickness of layers which are preferentially affected by Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles might contribute to the observed differences in AD pathology between crowns and fundi.
We found a reduced cortical thickness in fundi compared with crowns associated with a shift in the thickness of individual cortical layers, replicating previous findings 15, 23, 38, 39, 40, 98. Supragranular layers dominated over infragranular layers in fundi. Vice versa, in crowns, infragranular layers were more prominent than supragranular layers (Figure 3). This clearly shows that layers highly affected by pathology, that is, in particular layers III and V/VI, contribute more to overall cortical thickness in crowns than in fundi. Thus, the shift in thickness of layers can be ruled out as correlate for the higher abundance of pathology in fundi.
Figure 3.

Cortical thickness of gyral fundi and crowns of temporal cortex (Brodmann area 22) in normal human brain. Left: mean cortical thickness; Middle: Thickness of different cortical layers; Right: Relative distribution of layer thickness compared with the schematic position of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and Aß plaques (AP), preferentially found in layers II/III and V/VI. (mean values ± SD; ***P < 0.001; Student's t‐test).
We than analyzed potential differences between fundi and crowns in the normal human brain with respect to numerical density of neurons, synapses, GFAP‐positive astrocytes and vessels.
Corresponding to the higher density of both plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in fundi, we observed a higher density of vessels and of GFAP‐positive astrocytes in fundi compared with crowns of gyri (Figures 2 and 4), providing a potential correlate for the distribution of pathology. On the contrary, no significant differences in the overall density of neurons, of synapses or of the synapse‐to‐neuron ratio were observed between gyral fundi and crowns (Figure 5).
Figure 4.

Numerical density of blood vessels (left) and GFAP‐positive astrocytes (right) in gyral fundi and crowns of different cortical areas in normal human brain (mean values ± SD; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; Student's t‐test).
Figure 5.

Numerical density of neurons (top), synapses (middle) and the synapse‐to‐neurone ratio (bottom) in gyral fundi and crowns of different cortical areas in normal human brain (mean values ± SD).
Discussion
One of the most prominent evolutionary features of the mammalian brain is the surface expansion of the cerebral cortex resulting in cortical convolutions. Here, we show systematic inhomogeneities in the distribution of AD pathology along cortical convolutions indicating that the phylogenetic shaping of the cortex is associated with a mechanism that renders the human brain vulnerable to AD pathology.
Both Aß plaques and neurofibrillary tangles were found concentrated in sulcal fundi compared with gyral crowns. This confirms previous observations on the distribution of plaques made by several groups including our own 4, 10, 47, 72 and extends it toward the distribution of neurofibrillary tangles which had not been analyzed systematically before. A preferential involvement of sulcal fundi with both tau pathology and Aß pathology has similarly been observed in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) 71, 94 where it may result from stress concentration at the sulcal depth following trauma 32. While traumatic brain injury has long been thought to be an epigenetic risk factor for AD, a definitive link has yet to be established 65, and mechanisms that predispose the fundi to lesion formation in AD might be more complex. In any case, the inhomogenic distribution of AD pathology along the isocortical relief clearly indicates a role of those intrinsic cortical features that differ between fundi and crowns. Considering these intragyral differences of pathology will thus be a challenge to pathogenetic concepts of AD.
The potential relevance of systematic differences in AD pathology between fundi and crowns in an order of magnitude of 100% becomes apparent if translated into terms of diagnostic assessment. In the setting of low Thal phases (1 or 2) and Braak stages III or higher, differences in CERAD plaque scoring between sparse and moderate would give rise to a difference in the neuropathological diagnostic “ABC” score as defined by Montine et al 77 between “Low” and “Intermediate.”
Vulnerability to AD Pathology is Linked to Gyrification
Mammals can be distinguished on the basis of the cortical surface area of their brains and the degree of convolutions 21, 22, 55, 56. Gyrencephalics are characterized by folded or convoluted (gyrified) brains, in contrast to lissencephalics which have smooth‐surfaced or non‐convoluted brains 7, 63, 64, 67, 102. Larger primate brains are usually more convoluted than smaller ones 84, 107. Moreover, the degree of convolution accelerates with evolution, that is, cortical folding increases more rapidly with brain size among anthropoids compared with prosimians 109, 110. Accordingly, it has been suggested that the particularly high degree of cortical folding in humans may represent a morphological correlate that supports human‐specific cognitive abilities 69.
The primary reason for convolutions is that cortical surface area increases disproportionally with brain size. Convolutions are, thus, formed in a growth process with preference for tangential vs. radial cortical expansion 88, 101. This permits cortical enlargement while keeping the overall increase of brain volume and total fiber length to a minimum 80, 96, 111. These mechanisms, thus follow the requirements of “component placement optimization” 28 as an important design principle of neuronal architecture.
The precise mechanism leading to cortical convolutions is not entirely clear. There still exist two major concepts 24, 44, which attribute cortical folding primarily either to compressive forces induced by differential tangential expansion of the cortex 27, 70, 83, 87, 88, 91 or to tension along axons in the white matter 53, 54, 101. Still, there is consensus that cortical gyrification is based on an interplay between genetic determinants and self‐organizational principles that involve mechanical factors 6, 11, 24, 27, 30, 33, 44, 46, 49, 51, 54, 82, 92, 98, 105, 108, 109. Mechanical forces associated with folding may have a wide variety of effects on signal transduction, gene expression, differentiation and apoptosis 29, 59. The exposure to different tensional forces of the same classes of neurons in fundi and crowns during the process of gyrogenesis, thus, most likely results in different functional properties of these neurons [see also 1, 14].
During the formation of folds, also cellular morphology and the thickness of different layers is altered 105. Cortical thickness is higher in crowns of gyri than in fundi, and their laminar diameters show considerable differences which is linked to the different connectivity of these layers 27, 100, 105. In general, infragranular layers are thin along fundi and thick along crowns, while in reverse, supragranular layers are relatively thin along crowns and thick along fundi 15, 23, 39, 40, 41, 100; present study Figure 3). Infragranular layers are involved with specific thalamic input and cortical output, while supragranular layers are more restricted to cortico‐cortical connections 31, 99.
Gyrification, thus, seems to result in spatial constellations of network components in fundi that compared with crowns modify functional interactions between intrinsic and extrinsic tissue elements. The disproportionally higher intracortical connectivity within fundi may potentially promote intracortical transsynaptic spreading of pathological compounds including fibrillary aggregated Aß and tau 38, 66 which would agree with a more dense pathology in fundi. On the contrary, the strongly diminished infragranular part of the fundus may facilitate functional deprivation of cortical–subcortical cross‐talk. The lower content of the α1‐GABAA receptor subunit in fundi of the human prefrontal cortex 2, for example, indicates strongly diminished intrinsic GABA‐mediated inhibitory actions in the fundus. A decrease of synaptic inhibition has also been suggested to play a role in the formation of Aß‐plaques 26.
Mechanical impact during folding not only determines the shape and spatial orientation of neurons and dendrites, it also affects the density and layout of blood vessels 75. Here, we identified higher densities of blood vessels in fundi, that is, those areas that are also characterized by higher densities of plaques and tangles. The nature of this correlate and whether this means a causal relationship warrants further investigation. Still, current concepts of Aß plaque formation as a consequence of a disturbed balance between Aß‐production and clearance 106 as well as previous descriptions on a link between plaque formation and vascularization 9, 12, 74 concur with this observation.
Only little is known on specific architectonical characteristics of gyral subdivisions, and an in depth characterization of fundus‐crown differences was well beyond the aim of the current study. The differential distribution of AD‐related pathology between gyral subdivisions still indicates that features associated with cortical folding might be deleterious providing a basis toward vulnerability against AD pathology.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors herewith declare that there are no financial, personal or professional interests that could be construed to have influence on the work.
Statement of Author Contributions
TA, MM, UG, NF, FS, NW, CJ, ChE, H‐JG, WM, KB carried out experiments, study design and data analysis; TA, MM, UG, H‐JG, WM, KB interpreted the data and were involved in writing the article.
Acknowledgement
Support by the Fritz‐Thyssen‐Foundation (Az.10.13.1.144) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1. Acebes A, Ferrús A (2000) Cellular and molecular features of axon collaterals and dendrites. Trends Neurosci 23:557–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Akbarian S, Huntsman MM, Kim JJ, Tafazzoli A, Potkin SG, Bunney WE, Jones EG (1995) GABAA receptor subunit gene expression in human prefrontal cortex: comparison of schizophrenics and controls. Cereb Cortex 5:550–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC et al (2011) The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer: disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging – Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:270–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arendt T, Bigl V, Tennstedt A, Arendt A (1985) Neuronal loss in different parts of the nucleus basalis is related to neuritic plaque formation in cortical target areas in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience 14:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Arendt T, Brückner MK, Gertz HJ, Marcova L (1998) Cortical distribution of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease matches the pattern of neurons that retain their capacity of plastic remodelling in the adult brain. Neuroscience 83:991–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Armstrong E, Curtis M, Buxhoeveden DP, Fregoe C, Zilles K, Casanova M, McCarthy WF (1991) Cortical gyrification in the rhesus monkey: a test of the mechanical folding hypothesis. Cereb Cortex 1:426–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Armstrong E, Schleicher H, Omran H, Curtis M, Zilles K (1995) The ontogeny of human gyrification. Cereb Cortex 5:56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Armstrong RA, Cairns NJ (2010) Analysis of beta‐amyloid (Abeta) deposition in the temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease using Fourier (spectral) analysis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 36:248–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Armstrong RA (2006) Classic beta‐amyloid deposits cluster around large diameter blood vessels rather than capillaries in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neurovasc Res 3:289–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Armstrong RA (1994) Quantitative differences in beta/A4 protein subtypes in the parahippocampal gyrus and frontal cortex in Alzheimer's disease. Dementia 5:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bayly PV, Okamoto RJ, Xu G, Shi Y, Taber LA (2013) A cortical folding model incorporating stress‐dependent growth explains gyral wavelengths and stress patterns in the developing brain. Phys.Biol 10:016005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bell MA, Ball MJ (1990) Neuritic plaques and vessels of visual cortex in aging and Alzheimer's dementia. Neurobiol Aging 11:359–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Benilova I, Karran E, De Strooper B (2012) The toxic Aβ oligomer and Alzheimer's disease: an emperor in need of clothes. Nat Neurosci 15:349–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bernstein M, Lichtman JW (1999) Axonal atrophy: the retraction reaction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:364–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bok ST (1929) Der Einfluß der in den Furchen und Windungen auftretenden Krümmungen der Großhirnrinde auf die Rindenarchitektur. Z Ges Neurol Psychiatr 121:682–750. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K (2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease‐associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol 112:389–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Braak H, Braak E, Kalus P (1989) Alzheimer's disease: areal and laminar pathology in the occipital isocortex. Acta Neuropathol 77:494–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer‐related changes. Acta Neuropathol 80:239–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Braak H, Braak E (1992) The human entorhinal cortex: normal morphology and lamina‐specific pathology in various diseases. Neurosci Res 15:6–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Braendgaard H, Gundersen HJ (1986) The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system. J Neurosci Meth 18:39–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Brauer K, Schober W (1970) Katalog Der Säugetiergehirne (1. Teil). VEB Gustav‐Fischer‐Verlag: Jena. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Brauer K, Schober W (1976) Katalog Der Säugetiergehirne (2. Teil). VEB Gustav‐Fischer‐Verlag: Jena. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Brodmann K (1925) Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. In ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Barth: Leipzig. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Budday S, Steinmann P, Kuhl E (2015) Physical biology of human brain development. Front Cell Neurosci 9:257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Budday S, Steinmann P, Kuhl E (2014) The role of mechanics during brain development. J Mech Phys Solids 72:75–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Busche MA, Eichhoff G, Adelsberger H, Abramowski D, Wiederhold KH, Haass C et al (2008) Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Science 321:1686–1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Caviness VS Jr (1975) Mechanical model of brain convolutional development. Science 189:18–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Cherniak C (1995) Neural component placement. Trends Neurosci 18:522–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chicurel ME, Chen CS, Ingber DE (1998) Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:232–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ciarletta P, Balbi V, Kuhl E (2014) Pattern selection in growing tubular tissues. Phys Rev Lett 113:248101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL (2001) Translating developmental time across mammalian species. Neuroscience 105:7–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cloots RJH, Gervaise HMT, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD (2008) Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury: influences of the morphologic heterogeneities of the cerebral cortex. Ann Biomed Eng 36:1203–1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Conolly CJ (1950) External Morphology of Primate Brain. Charles C Thomas: Springfield, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
- 34. De Lacoste MC, White CL 3rd (1993) The role of cortical connectivity in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: a review and model system. Neurobiol Aging 14:1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Cummings JL, Dekosky ST, Barberger‐Gateau P et al (2010) Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol 9:1118–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Dekosky ST, Barberger‐Gateau P, Cummings J et al (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS‐ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6:734–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo JL, Blennow K et al (2014) Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG‐2 criteria. Lancet Neurol 13:614–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Duyckaerts C, Uchihara T, Seilhean D, He Y, Hauw JJ (1997) Dissociation of Alzheimer type pathology in a disconnected piece of cortex. Acta Neuropathol 93:501–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Economo CV (1926) Die Bedeutung der Hirnwindungen. Allg Z Psychiatr Psych‐Gerichtl Med 84:123–132. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Economo CV (1927) Zellaufbau Der Grosshirnrinde Des Menschen: Zehn Vorlesungen. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Economo CV, Koskinas GN (1925) Die Cytoarchitektonik Der Hirnrinde Des Erwachsenen Menschen. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Flach K, Hilbrich I, Schiffmann A, Gärtner U, Krüger M, Leonhardt M et al (2012) Tau oligomers impair artificial membrane integrity and cellular viability. J Biol Chem 287:43223–43233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR (1975) Mini‐Mental State (a practical Method for grading the state of patients for the clinician). J Psychiat Res 12:189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Franze K (2013) The mechanical control of nervous system development. Development 140:3069–3077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gärtner U, Alpár A, Reimann F, Seeger G, Heumann R, Arendt T (2004) Constitutive Ras activity induces hippocampal hypertrophy and remodeling of pyramidal neurons in synRas mice. J Neurosci Res 77:630–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Gärtner U, Holzer M, Heumann R, Arendt T (1995) Induction of p21ras in Alzheimer pathology. Neuroreport 6:1441–1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Gentleman SM, Allsop D, Bruton CJ, Jagoe R, Polak JM, Roberts GW (1992) Quantitative differences in the deposition of beta A4 protein in the sulci and gyri of frontal and temporal isocortex in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett 136:27–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Gibson PH (1983) Form and distribution of senile plaques seen in silver impregnated sections in the brains of intellectually normal elderly people and people with Alzheimer‐type dementia. Neuropath Appl Neurobiol 9:379–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Goriely A, BenAmar M (2005) Differential growth and instability in elastic shells. Phys Rev Lett 94:198103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Grünthal E (1930) Die pathologische anatomie der senilen demenz und der alzheimerschen krankheit. In: Handbuch Der Geisteskrankheiten. Die Anatomie Der Psychosen. Bumke O (ed), Vol. 11, pp. 638–672. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Grunwald M, Busse F, Hensel A, Kruggel F, Riedel‐Heller S, Wolf H et al (2001) Correlation between cortical theta activity and hippocampal volumes in health, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia. J Clin Neurophysiol 18:178–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Gundersen HJ (1986) Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 143:3–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Herculano‐Houzel S, Mota B, Wong P, Kaas JH (2010) Connectivity driven white matter scaling and folding in primate cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19008–19013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Hilgetag CC, Barbas H (2005) Developmental mechanics of the primate cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol 210:411–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hofman MA (1989) On the evolution and geometry of the brain in mammals. Prog Neurobiol 32:137–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hofman MA (1985) Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. I. The cortical surface. Brain Behav Evol 27:28–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140:566–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Carrillo MC et al (2010) National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Dement 8:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ingber DE, Tensegrity I (2003) Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116:1157–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Jack CR, Jr , Albert MS, Knopman DS, McKhann GM, Sperling RA, Carrillo MC et al (2011) Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging – Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:257–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Jack CR, Jr , Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW et al (2010) Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 9:119–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. James OG, Doraiswamy PM, Borges‐Neto S (2015) PET Imaging of Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease and Tauopathies. Front Neurol 6:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Jerison HJ (1982) Allometry, brain size, cortical surface, and convolutedness. In: Primate Brain Evolution: Methods and Concepts. Armstrong E, Falk D (eds), pp. 77–84. Plenum Press: New York. [Google Scholar]
- 64. Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. Academic Press: New York. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH (2010) Traumatic brain injury and amyloid‐β pathology: a link to Alzheimer's disease? Nat Rev Neurosci 11:361–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Jucker M, Walker LC (2013) Self‐propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 501:45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Kappers JA, Huber GC, Crosby EC (1963) The Comparative Anatomy of Nervous System of Vertebrates, Including Man. Hafner: New York. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Klüver H, Barrera E (1953) A method for the combined staining of cells and fibers in the nervous system. J Neuropath Exp Neurol 12:400–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Luders E, Narr KL, Bilder RM, Szeszko PR, Gurbani MN, Hamilton L et al (2008) Mapping the relationship between cortical convolution and intelligence: effects of gender. Cereb Cortex 18:2019–2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Mares V, Lodin Z (1970) The cellular kinetics of the developing mouse cerebellum. II. The function of the external granular layer in the process of gyrification. Brain Res 23:343–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. McKee AC, Gavett BE, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Cantu RC, Kowall NW et al (2010) TDP‐43 proteinopathy and motor neuron disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69:918–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. McKenzie JE, Gentleman SM, Royston MC, Edwards RJ, Roberts GW (1992) Quantification of plaque types in sulci and gyri of the medial frontal lobe in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett 143:23–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Jr , Kawas CH et al (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Meyer‐Luehmann M, Spires‐Jones TL, Prada C, Garcia‐Alloza M, de Calignon A, Rozkalne A et al (2008) Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid‐beta plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Nature 451:720–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Miodonski A (1974) The angioarchitectonics and cytoarchitectonics (impregnation modo Golgi‐Cox) structure of the fissural frontal neocortex in dog. Folia Biol (Krakow) 22:237–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM et al (1991) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 41:479–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW et al (2012) National Institute on Aging; Alzheimer's Association. National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol 123:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Morris JC, Heymann A, Mohs RC, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Fillenbaum G et al (1989) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 39:1159–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Nordberg A (2015) Dementia in 2014: towards early diagnosis in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 11:69–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995) The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci 18:373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Pearson RC, Esiri MM, Hiorns RW, Wilcock GK, Powell TP (1985) Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:4531–4534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Rakic P (2004) Genetic control of cortical convolutions. Science 303:1983–1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Reillo I, de Juan Romero C, García‐Cabezas MA, Borrell V (2011) A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 21:1674–1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T (1982) The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry 139:1136–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Rilling JK, Insel TR (1999) The primate neocortex in comparative perspective using magnetic resonance imaging. J Hum Evol 37:191–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Rogers J, Morrison JH (1985) Quantitative morphology and regional and laminar distributions of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 5:2801–2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Ronan L, Fletcher PC (2015) From genes to folds: a review of cortical gyrification theory. Brain Struct Funct 220:2475–2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Ronan L, Voets N, Rua C, Alexander‐Bloch A, Hough M, Mackay C et al (2014) Differential tangential expansion as a mechanism for cortical gyrification. Cereb Cortex 24:2219–2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Saper CB, Wainer BH, German DC (1987) Axonal and transneuronal transport in the transmission of neurological disease: potential role in system degenerations, including Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience 23:389–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Simchowicz T (1911) Histologische Studien über die senile Demenz. In: Histologische Und Histopathologische Arbeiten Über Die Großhirnrinde Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung Der Pathologischen Anatomie Der Geisteskrankheiten. Nissl F, Alzheimer A (eds), Vol 4, pp. 267–444. Fischer: Jena. [Google Scholar]
- 91. Smart IH, McSherry GM (1986) Gyrus formation in the cerebral cortex of the ferret. II. Description of the internal histological changes. J Anat 147:27–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Smith DH (2009) Stretch growth of integrated axon tracts: extremes and extrapolations. Prog Neurobiol 89:231–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM et al (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:280–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Stein TD, Montenigro PH, Alvarez VE, Xia W, Crary JF, Tripodis Y et al (2015) Beta‐amyloid deposition in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol 130:21–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Sterio DC (1984) The unbiased estimation of numer and sizes of arbitrary particles using the dissector. J Microsc 134:127–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Supèr H, Soriano E, Uylings HBM (1998) The function of the preplate in development and evolution of the neocortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Rev 27:40–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H (2002) Phases of A beta‐deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58:1791–1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Toro R, Burnod Y (2005) A morphogenetic model for the development of cortical convolutions. Cereb Cortex 15:1900–1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Valverde F (1985) The organizing principles of the primary visual cortex in the monkey. In Cerebral Cortex. Peters A, Jones EG (eds), Vol 3, pp. 207–257. Plenum: New York. [Google Scholar]
- 100. Van Essen DC, Maunsell JHR (1980) Two‐dimensional maps of the cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 191:255–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Van Essen DC (1997) A tension‐based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 385:313–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. von Bonin G (1941) Side lights on cerebral evolution: brain size of lower vertebrates and degree of cortical folding. J Gen Psychol 25:273–282. [Google Scholar]
- 103. Von Braunmühl A (1957) Alterserkrankungen des Zentralnervensystems. Senile Involution. Senile Demenz. Alzheimersche Krankheit. In: Handbuch Der Speziellen Pathologischen Anatomie Und Histologie. Lubarsch O, Henke F, Rössle R (eds), Vol 13/1A, pp. 337–539. Springer: Berlin. [Google Scholar]
- 104. Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ (2007) A beta oligomers ‐ a decade of discovery. J Neurochem 101:1172–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Welker W (1990) Why does cerebral cortex fissure and fold? A review of determinants of gyri and sulci. In: Cerebral Cortex. Jones EG, Peters A (eds), pp. 3–136. Plenum Press: New York. [Google Scholar]
- 106. Weller RO, Subash M, Preston SD, Mazanti I, Carare RO (2008) Perivascular drainage of amyloid‐beta peptides from the brain and its failure in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer's disease. Brain Pathol 18:253–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. West MJ (1999) Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias. Trends Neurosci 22:51–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Wolf H, Hensel A, Arendt T, Kivipelto M, Winblad B, Gertz HJ (2004) Serum lipids and hippocampal volume: the link to Alzheimer's disease? Ann Neurol 56:745–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Zilles K, Armstrong E, Moser KH, Schleicher A, Stephen H (1989) Gyrification in the cerebral cortex of primates. Brain Behav Evol 34:143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Zilles K, Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Kretschmann HJ (1988) The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol (Berl) 179:173–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Zilles K, Palomero‐Gallagher N, Amunts K (2013) Development and cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 36:275–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
