Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):1263–1274. doi: 10.1111/jch.13918

Readmission and mortality among heart failure patients with history of hypertension in a statewide database

Michail Giakoumis 1,, Davit Sargsyan 1, John B Kostis 1, Javier Cabrera 2, Sanketkumar Dalwadi 1, William J Kostis 1; for the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 36) Study Group
PMCID: PMC8029945  PMID: 33051955

Abstract

Objective was to examine the temporal trends in readmission and mortality of heart failure (HF) patients with history of hypertension. This study includes 51 141 patients with history of hypertension who were discharged with a first diagnosis of HF between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014. Data were obtained from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS), a statewide database of all hospitalizations for cardiovascular (CV) disease in New Jersey. The temporal trends of mortality, rates of HF‐specific readmission, and all‐cause readmissions up to 1 year after discharge were examined using multivariable logistic regression. The difference in all‐cause mortality at 3 years between patients who were readmitted compared to those who were not readmitted at 1 year was examined. The number of patients with history of hypertension and HF remained unchanged during the study period. Male gender, black race, comorbidities, and admission to non‐teaching hospitals were predictors of HF readmission and CV mortality (P < .05 for all). Readmission rate for any cause increased during the study period (P < .001) while rates of HF readmissions and mortality remained relatively unchanged. Patients that had been readmitted within a year exhibited a significantly higher 3‐year mortality (P < .001). CV mortality among HF patients with history of hypertension did not change significantly between 2000 and 2014, while the rates of all‐cause readmission increased. Patients who were readmitted had higher 3‐year mortality (P < .001) than those who were not.

Keywords: heart failure, hypertension, population‐based study, readmissions

1. INTRODUCTION

Hypertension frequently antedates the development of heart failure (HF). In the Framingham Heart Study, 91% of all newly diagnosed HF patients had a documented history of hypertension. 1 Heart failure is the most common reason for hospital admission in adults and is associated with impaired quality of life, high mortality, financial burden, and frequent readmissions. 2 , 3 The US health care expenditures on HF reached $30.7 billion between 2011 and 2014, 4 and this number is anticipated to increase to almost $70 billion by 2030. 5 Previous studies have addressed the issues of the incidence, outcomes, and time trends of HF readmissions of patients with history of hypertension. Most of these reports were either from single‐center intervention trials, were review papers and meta‐analyses, used different methodologies, and did not include follow‐up for more than 30 days. Also, these papers did not examine secular changes or did not report on the long‐term mortality of patients who were readmitted as compared to those who were not. 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15

The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence, time trends, and outcomes of HF readmissions in a population‐based cohort of 51 141 HF patients with history of hypertension from 2000 to 2014 using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) in New Jersey. 16 , 17 , 18 We also examined differences in mortality among patients who were readmitted versus patients who were not.

2. METHODS

2.1. Data sources

The MIDAS database was used to obtain information on patients with history of hypertension who were hospitalized for HF. MIDAS captures the dates of admission and discharge, demographics, insurance type, reason for admission, and selected comorbid conditions. International Classification of Diseases‐Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) in acute care non‐federal hospitals in New Jersey from 2000 to 2014 was used for the identification of hypertension, HF, and comorbid conditions. The ICD‐9 codes used to identify the above variables are shown in Table S1. Hospital characteristics included hospital location (inner city, urban, rural, and suburban), teaching status (teaching vs non‐teaching), and availability of invasive or interventional procedures. The date and cause of death were obtained from New Jersey Death Registration files. We used “The Link King”, 19 an automated public record linkage and consolidation software that, in a report of 500 000 linked records chosen at random and referred for blinded clerical review, had a positive predictive value of 96.1% and a sensitivity of 96.7%. 20

Patients with history of hypertension who were hospitalized for HF were identified with ICD‐9‐CM primary discharge diagnosis code 428.xx (reason for admission). The cause of death was recorded using the ICD‐10‐CM codes (Table S2).

The information in MIDAS has been validated as correct in 98.8% for vital status at discharge and demographics. 21 Study patients were 18 years or older and history of hypertension who were discharged alive after a first admission for HF. Of the 51 141 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 1756 (3.4%) were excluded from the statistical analysis because of missing values. Patients with history of cancer and/or HIV were not included in this study.

2.2. Study variables

Study variables included patient demographics, comorbid conditions, hospital characteristics [teaching/non‐teaching, geographic location, facilities for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)], length of stay (LOS), and insurance type.

2.3. Outcomes—Statistics

Outcomes were CV and all‐cause death, readmission for HF, and all‐cause readmission at 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days and at 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, hospital characteristics, LOS, and the comorbid conditions listed above were developed. The time trends of the end points were examined using linear models. The effect of readmission on all‐cause death at 3 years in HF patients with history of hypertension who were readmitted as compared to those who were not readmitted was studied using logistic regression. This study was approved by the Rutgers Health Sciences Institutional Review Board.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Outcomes at 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days and at 1 year following discharge

The number of patients with history of hypertension and a first diagnosis of HF as the reason for admission who were discharged alive by year of admission ranged from 3065 to 3655 per year (Table 1). The number of patients with history of hypertension and HF remained unchanged during the study period (Figure 1). All‐cause readmissions demonstrated a statistically significant positive slope by 0.478 percent per year (95% CI: 0.317‐0.639, P < .001) while linear trends of 1‐year outcomes with respect to HF readmissions, all‐cause mortality and CV mortality there were not altered considerably (Figure 2). At 1 year, more than sixty per cent of the patients were readmitted (61.3%) and more than one‐fifth (21.4%) died. About one half of the study patients were admitted to teaching hospitals (47.8%), while 43.8% of the patients were admitted to hospitals with PCI facilities. Over one sixth (17.9%) of the patients were admitted to hospitals located in an inner city, 24.1% to hospitals in urban areas, 42.5% in suburb locations and 12.1% to hospitals in rural areas (Table 2). The baseline characteristics of the study population are described in Table 3 (Table 3).

Table 1.

Number of first heart failure admissions by year

Year Counts First heart failure diagnosis
2000 3303 74.4
2001 3300 74.5
2002 3540 74.2
2003 3566 74.7
2004 3300 74.5
2005 3276 75.3
2006 3084 75.2
2007 3065 75.3
2008 3465 74.9
2009 3510 75.5
2010 3576 75.1
2011 3474 74.7
2012 3408 75.2
2013 3623 74.9
2014 3651 74.9
TOTAL 51 141

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of first HF discharges. Total of 51 141 patients with history of hypertension, no prior HF

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cardiovascular outcome trends in HF patients with history of hypertension

Table 2.

Characteristics of heart failure patients with history of hypertension

Description Number of Patients Percent Patients
Number of Heart Failure Patients 51 141
Mean age at first heart failure admission ± S.D 74.9 ± 14.1
Male (%) 22 888 44.8
Race (%)
White 38 262 74.8
Black 7992 15.6
Other 4887 9.6
Ethnicity (%)
Hispanic 4007 7.8
Non‐Hispanic 42 909 83.9
Unknown 4225 8.3
Insurance (%)
Commercial 12 871 25.2
Medicare 35 719 69.8
Medicaid/Self‐Pay/Other 2551 5
Admission Hospital Type (%)
Teaching 24 420 47.8
Non‐Teaching 24 965 48.8
Unknown 1756 3.4
Admission to Hospital Area (%)
Urban 12 310 24.1
Inner city 9168 17.9
Rural 6194 12.1
Suburb 21 713 42.5
Unknown 1756 3.4
Admission Hospital Cath Lab
Cath Lab 22 410 43.8
No Cath Lab 26 975 52.7
Unknown 1756 3.4

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics

Description Number of patients Percent patients
Prior AF 14 278 27.9
Prior AMI 6883 13.5
History of anemia 13 188 25.8
History of kidney disease 5104 10
History of COPD 13 086 25.6
History of diabetes 21 193 41.4
History of hyperlipidemia 22 879 44.7
History OSA 1028 2
Parkinson 900 1.8
Prior stroke 3924 7.7
Prior TIA 3610 7.1

Abbreviations: AF, Atrial fibrillation; AMI, Acute Myocardial infarction; and TIA, Transient ischemic attack; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OSA, Obstructive sleep apnea.

All‐cause and HF readmissions are presented in Tables S3 and S4. All‐cause readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year were 20.7% and 61.29%, respectively (Table S3), whereas HF‐specific readmission occurred for 6.34% of the patients at 30 days and 21.43% at 1 year (Table S4). The unadjusted 30‐day readmission rates as well as all‐cause and CV death remained relatively stable (Tables S3,S5, and S6).

Predictors of higher all‐cause readmission at 1 year were LOS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02‐1.06), anemia (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.15‐1.26), atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04‐1.13), CKD (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.26‐1.45), COPD (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.20‐1.30), diabetes (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.18‐1.28), hyperlipidemia (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.10‐1.19), and admission to a non‐teaching hospital (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05‐1.15) (P < .001 for all, Table 4). Patients with commercial insurance were less likely to be readmitted (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.84‐0.93, P < .001), and male gender was associated with better outcomes (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90‐0.98, P < .001).

Table 4.

All‐cause readmissions

Risk Factor 30‐Day 90‐Day 180‐Day 1‐Year
Chronic Kidney Disease

1.297 (1.206, 1.394)

<0.001

1.309 (1.228, 1.395)

<0.001

1.326 (1.244, 1.395)

<0.001

1.35 (1.26, 1.446)

<0.001

Stroke

1.252 (0.967, 1.621)

0.088

1.222 (0.973, 1.535)

0084

1.191 (0.95, 1.493)

0.130

1.282 (1.007, 1.631)

0.044

Parkinson

1.199 (1.024, 1.405)

0.024

1.194 (1.041, 1.37)

0.011

1.112 (0.971, 1.273)

0.124

1.219 (1.059, 1.404)

0.006

Anemia

1.190 (1.132, 1.251)

<0.001

1.198 (1.148, 1.251)

<0.001

1.205 (1.156, 1.257)

<0.001

1.203 (1.151, 1.257)

<0.001

Diabetes

1.120 (1.07, 1.173)

<0.001

1.16 (1.116, 1.206)

<0.001

1.194 (1.15, 1.24)

<0.001

1.228 (1.181, 1.277)

<0.001

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

1.132 (1.077, 1.19)

<0.001

1.162 (1.114, 1.212)

<0.001

1.195 (1.146, 1.245)

<0.001

1.249 (1.196, 1.304)

<0.001

Length of Stay

1.128 (1.101, 1.156)

<0.001

1.121 (1.098, 1.144)

<0.001

1.09 (1.069, 1.112)

<0.001

1.038 (1.017, 1.059)

<0.001

Acute Myocardial Infarction

1.098 (1.03, 1.17)

0.004

1.07 (1.013, 1.13)

0.0015

1.027 (0.974, 1.084)

0.320

1.001 (0.948, 1.058)

0.959

Area: Inner City Area vs Urban

1.047 (0.977, 1.122)

0.191

1.066 (1.006, 1.13)

0.031

1.039 (0.982, 1.1)

0.186

1.034 (0.975, 1.096)

0.263

Hosp: Non‐Teaching vs Teaching

1.064 (1.003, 1.129)

0.040

1.046 (0.995, 1.1)

0.076

1.075 (1.024, 1.128)

<0.003

1.098 (1.045, 1.154)

<0.001

Discharge year

1.022 (1.016, 1.028)

<0.001

1.02 (1.015, 1.024)

<0.001

1.019 (1.014, 1.024)

<0.001

1.013 (1.008, 1.017)

<0.001

Area: Suburb Area vs Urban

1.008 (0.953, 1.066)

0.782

1.038 (0.99, 1.088)

0.124

1.006 (0.961, 1.053)

0.797

0.983 (0.937, 1.03)

0.464

Hyperlipidemia

1.021 (0.974, 1.07)

0.388

1.081 (1.038, 1.125)

<0.001

1.096 (1.054, 1.139)

<0.001

1.141 (1.097, 1.187)

<0.001

Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter

1.021 (0.971, 1.073)

0.425

1.045 (1.002, 1.091)

0.040

1.054 (1.012, 1.098)

0.0012

1.083 (1.038, 1.129)

<0.001

Insurance: Medicaid/Self‐Pay/Other vs Medicare

1.071 (0.96, 1.194)

0.220

0.964 (0.878, 1.059)

0.446

1.013 (0.925, 1.11)

0.775

1.054 (0.958, 1.16)

0.282

Male vs Female

0.969 (0.925, 1.014)

0.175

0.975 (0.938, 1.014)

0.202

0.963 (0.928, 1.0)

0.050

0.939 (0.904, 0.976)

<0.001

Age (X10)

0.966 (0.947, 0.985)

<0.001

0.954 (0.938, 0.97)

<0.001

0.939 (0.924, 0.955)

<0.001

0.929 (0.914, 0.945)

<0.001

Hospital: No Cath Lab vs Cath Lab

0.98 (0.924, 1.039)

0.501

1.01 (0.961, 1.061)

0.707

0.998 (0.952, 1.047)

0.944

1.019 (0.97, 1.07)

0.459

Race: Other vs White

0.937 (0.867, 1.014)

0.106

0.91 (0.852, 0.972)

0.005

0.95 (0.891, 1.013)

0.115

0.964 (0.903, 1.03)

0.278

Race: Black vs White

0.954 (0.891, 1.022)

0.179

1.031 (0.973, 1.092)

0.298

1.11 (1.05, 1.174)

<0.001

1.129 (1.066, 1.197)

<0.001

Ethnicity: Non‐Hispanic vs Hispanic

0.947 (0.868, 1.032)

0.214

0.841 (0.781, 0.904)

<0.001

0.858 (0.798, 0.922)

<0.001

0.87 (0.807, 0.937)

<0.001

Sleep Apnea

0.92 (0.787, 1.075)

0.294

0.887 (0.776, 1.013)

0.077

0.946 (0.831, 1.078)

0.405

1.00 (0.871, 1.148)

1.000

Insurance: Commercial vs Medicare

0.899 (0.848, 0.953)

<0.001

0.873 (0.831, 0.917)

<0.001

0.864 (0.824, 0.906)

<0.001

0.883 (0.841, 0.927)

<0.001

Ethnicity: Unknown vs Hispanic

0.871 (0.777, 0.976)

0.018

0.781 (0.71, 0.859)

<0.001

0.8 (0.729, 0.877)

<0.001

0.809 (0.736, 0.89)

<0.001

Area: Rural Area vs Urban

0.866 (0.797, 0.94)

<0.001

0.878 (0.82, 0.941)

<0.001

0.842 (0.789, 0.899)

<0.001

0.822 (0.769, 0.878)

<0.001

Transient Ischemic Attack

0.851 (0.65, 1.114)

0.241

0.891 (0.703, 1.129)

0.339

0.919 (0.726, 1.162)

0.480

0.859 (0.669, 1.103)

0.233

Logistic regression identified black race (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.17‐1.33), stroke (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.2‐1.96), history of AMI (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05‐1.19), COPD (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03‐1.14), and diabetes (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15‐1.26), as important predictors of HF readmission for HF at 1 year of follow‐up, (P < .001 for all, Table 5). A similar effect of insurance type was observed for HF readmissions (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87‐0.97, P < .001).

Table 5.

Heart failure readmissions

Risk Factor 30‐Day 90‐Day 180‐Day 1‐Year
Stroke

1.917 (1.349, 2.722)

<0.001

1.435 (1.06, 1.942)

0.019

1.398 (1.064, 1.836)

0.016

1.535 (1.202, 1.96)

<0.001

Hospital: No Cath Lab vs Cath Lab

1.175 (1.065, 1.296)

0.001

1.098 (1.019, 1.183)

0.014

1.08 (1.012, 1.153)

0.020

1.047 (0.987, 1.11)

0.010

Acute Myocardial Infarction

1.219 (1.1, 1.351)

<0.001

1.195 (1.105, 1.293)

<0.001

1.133 (1.057, 1.215)

<0.001

1.12 (1.052, 1.193)

<0.001

Insurance: Medicaid/Self‐Pay/Other vs Medicare

1.27 (1.074, 1.502)

0.005

1.244 (1.092, 1.417)

0.001

1.235 (1.101, 1.386)

<0.001

1.19 (1.072, 1.321)

0.001

Area: Suburb Area vs Urban

1.096 (0.997, 1.204)

0.058

1.053 (0.98, 1.131)

0.157

1.051 (0.987, 1.119)

0.122

1.01 (0.955, 1.068)

0.719

Diabetes

1.11 (1.029, 1.198)

0.007

1.153 (1.088, 1.221)

<0.001

1.172 (1.114, 1.233)

<0.001

1.208 (1.154, 1.264)

<0.001

Race: Black vs White

1.053 (0.942, 1.178)

0.360

1.14 (1.048, 1.24)

0.002

1.21 (1.125, 1.302)

<0.001

1.248 (1.169, 1.333)

<0.001

Chronic Kidney Disease

1.106 (0.978, 1.25)

0.108

1.1 (1.001, 1.209)

0.048

1.073 (0.987, 1.166)

0.098

1.078 (1, 1.162)

0.050

Length of Stay

1.06 (1.018, 1.103)

0.005

1.055 (1.023, 1.087)

<0.001

1.058 (1.03, 1.086)

<0.001

1.034 (1.009, 1.058)

<0.001

Anemia

1.051 (0.966, 1.145)

0.249

1.026 (0.962, 1.095)

0.434

1.026 (0.969, 1.086)

0.376

1.037 (0.986, 1.091)

0.157

Hospital: Non‐Teaching vs Teaching

1.006 (0.912, 1.11)

0.897

1.032 (0.957, 1.112)

0.417

1.072 (1.004, 1.145)

0.037

1.092 (1.03, 1.159)

0.003

Area: Inner City Area vs Urban

1.036 (0.922, 1.163)

0.554

1.071 (0.981, 1.168)

0.124

1.107 (1.026, 1.194)

0.009

1.073 (1.003, 1.149)

0.040

COPD

1.023 (0.941, 1.112)

0.594

1.047 (0.983, 1.116)

0.152

1.059 (1.002, 1.119)

0.043

1.086 (1.033, 1.141)

0.001

Discharge year

1.012 (1.002, 1.021)

0.013

1.007 (1, 1.014)

0.047

1.006 (1, 1.013)

0.040

0.999 (0.993, 1.004)

0.707

Area: Rural Area vs Urban

0.995 (0.87, 1.137)

0.941

0.985 (0.89, 1.09)

0.770

0.941 (0.86, 1.029)

0.183

0.936 (0.864, 1.014)

0.105

Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter

0.994 (0.913, 1.082)

0.892

1.055 (0.99, 1.125)

0.098

1.076 (1.017, 1.137)

0.010

1.063 (1.011, 1.117)

0.017

Hyperlipidemia

0.956 (0.884, 1.035)

0.264

1.031 (0.971, 1.095)

0.314

1.045 (0.992, 1.101)

0.100

1.055 (1.007, 1.106)

0.024

Race: Other vs White

0.914 (0.802, 1.043)

0.183

0.899 (0.813, 0.994)

0.038

0.914 (0.837, 0.998)

0.046

0.966 (0.894, 1.044)

0.382

Age (X10)

0.962 (0.932, 0.994)

0.019

0.99 (0.966, 1.015)

0.429

0.989 (0.967, 1.01)

0.305

0.984 (0.964, 1.005)

0.111

Insurance: Commercial vs Medicare

0.976 (0.886, 1.074)

0.616

0.93 (0.864, 1.001)

0.055

0.914 (0.857, 0.975)

0.007

0.919 (0.868, 0.974)

0.004

Male vs Female

1.079 (1, 1.164)

0.051

1.059 (1, 1.122)

0.052

1.05 (0.998, 1.104)

0.061

1.051 (1.005, 1.1)

0.030

Ethnicity: Non‐Hispanic vs Hispanic

0.858 (0.747, 0.985)

0.030

0.806 (0.726, 0.895)

<0.001

0.834 (0.76, 0.915)

<0.001

0.833 (0.767, 0.906)

<0.001

Sleep Apnea

0.803 (0.61, 1.057)

0.117

0.775 (0.627, 0.959)

0.019

0.789 (0.656, 0.949)

0.012

0.814 (0.693, 0.958)

0.013

Ethnicity: Unknown vs Hispanic

0.723 (0.598, 0.875)

<0.001

0.765 (0.664, 0.88)

<0.001

0.813 (0.719, 0.92)

<0.001

0.781 (0.699, 0.872)

<0.001

Parkinson

0.767 (0.561, 1.049)

0.097

0.834 (0.666, 1.045)

0.114

0.871 (0.718, 1.057)

0.162

0.921 (0.778, 1.091)

0.342

Transient Ischemic Attack

0.472 (0.324, 0.687)

<0.001

0.65 (0.472, 0.894)

0.008

0.681 (0.511, 0.907)

0.009

0.653 (0.505, 0.843)

0.001

Logistic regression identified age per 10 years (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.53‐1.60), male gender (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12‐1.23), LOS (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.43‐1.50), anemia (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23‐1.36), history of AMI (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15‐1.31), COPD (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.17‐1.29), CKD (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.27‐1.48), stroke (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.19‐1.96), and Parkinson's disease (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15‐1.55), as important predictors of all‐cause mortality at 1 year (P < .001 for all, Table 6). Commercial insurance was associated with lower all‐cause mortality (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78‐0.86, P < .001).

Table 6.

All‐cause death

Risk Factor 30‐Day 90‐Day 180‐Day 1‐Year
Length of Stay

1.753 (1.668, 1.842)

<0.001

1.691 (1.632, 1.753)

<0.001

1.58 (1.533, 1.629)

<0.001

1.463 (1.425, 1.501)

<0.001

Age (X10)

1.667 (1.589, 1.75)

<0.001

1.62 (1.567, 1.675)

<0.001

1.592 (1.548, 1.636)

<0.001

1.567 (1.531, 1.604)

<0.001

Ethnicity: Non‐Hispanic vs Hispanic

1.305 (1.048, 1.625)

0.017

1.39 (1.193, 1.618)

<0.001

1.458 (1.285, 1.655)

<0.001

1.442 (1.297, 1.602)

<0.001

Ethnicity: Unknown vs Hispanic

1.388 (1.07, 1.801)

0.014

1.402 (1.168, 1.683)

<0.001

1.393 (1.195, 1.624)

<0.001

1.364 (1.199, 1.552)

<0.001

Parkinson

1.221 (0.934, 1.596)

0.145

1.371 (1.136, 1.655)

0.001

1.335(1.132, 1.575)

<0.001

1.335 (1.151, 1.547)

<0.001

Chronic Kidney Disease

1.294 (1.123, 1.491)

<0.001

1.327 (1.198, 1.47)

<0.001

1.337 (1.225, 1.459)

<0.001

1.369 (1.267, 1.478)

<0.001

Stroke

1.188 (0.731, 1.933)

0.487

1.518 (1.1, 2.096)

0.011

1.588 (1.204, 2.094)

0.001

1.525 (1.188, 1.957)

<0.001

Acute Myocardial Infarction

1.172 (1.031, 1.332)

0.015

1.218 (1.113, 1.334)

<0.001

1.205 (1.116, 1.301)

<0.001

1.229 (1.15, 1.313)

<0.001

Anemia

1.136 (1.031, 1.252)

0.010

1.145 (1.068, 1.228)

<0.001

1.256 (1.185, 1.333)

<0.001

1.296 (1.231, 1.364)

<0.001

Area: Suburb Area vs Urban

1.153 (1.032, 1.287)

0.012

1.061 (0.981, 1.147)

0.136

1.061 (0.993, 1.134)

0.079

1.054 (0.996, 1.117)

0.071

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

1.183 (1.073, 1.305)

<0.001

1.177 (1.097, 1.262)

<0.001

1.185 (1.117, 1.257)

<0.001

1.228 (1.167, 1.293)

<0.001

Area:Rural Area vs Urban

1.207 (1.03, 1.413)

0.020

1.061 (0.948, 1.188)

0.300

1.037 (0.942, 1.141)

0.458

0.984 (0.906, 1.069)

0.707

Hospital: No Cath Lab vs Cath Lab

1.03 (0.922, 1.151)

0.602

1.025 (0.946, 1.11)

0.549

1.012 (0.946, 1.084)

0.723

1.036 (0.977, 1.1)

0.237

Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter

1.096 (0.999, 1.202)

0.052

1.055 (0.987, 1.128)

0.115

1.047 (0.989, 1.108)

0.113

1.013 (0.964, 1.064)

0.620

TIA

1.11 (0.671, 1.838)

0.685

0.835 (0.596, 1.17)

0.295

0.792 (0.593, 1.057)

0.113

0.819 (0.631, 1.062)

0.132

Sleep Apnea

0.962 (0.646, 1.432)

0.848

0.89 (0.67, 1.183)

0.422

0.886 (0.701, 1.119)

0.310

0.885 (0.728, 1.076)

0.222

Discharge year

1.028 (1.016, 1.039)

<0.001

1.021 (1.013, 1.029)

<0.001

1.015 (1.008, 1.022)

<0.001

1.006 (1.001, 1.012)

0.030

Area: Inner City Area vs Urban

0.918 (0.785, 1.075)

0.288

0.924 (0.83, 1.029)

0.152

0.982 (0.898, 1.073)

0.684

0.97 (0.899, 1.047)

0.438

Hospital: Non‐Teaching vs Teaching

0.953 (0.853, 1.065)

0.393

1.006 (0.929, 1.09)

0.875

1.003 (0.937, 1.074)

0.924

1.02 (0.961, 1.082)

0.516

Diabetes

0.953 (0.6, 1.049)

0.329

0.969 (0.905, 1.037)

0.357

0.983 (0.929, 1.041)

0.566

1 (0.953, 1.05)

0.991

Insurance: Medicaid/Self‐Pay/Other vs Medicare

0.88 (0.612, 1.266)

0.492

0.905 (0.715, 1.145)

0.405

0.984 (0.82, 1.181)

0.863

1.003 (0.867, 1.161)

0.964

Insurance: Commercial vs Medicare

0.895 (0.784, 1.021)

0.100

0.865 (0.788, 0.948)

0.002

0.838 (0.776, 0.905)

<0.001

0.803 (0.752, 0.857)

<0.001

Male vs Female

1.173 (1.071, 1.285)

<0.001

1.179 (1.105, 1.258)

<0.001

1.183 (1.12, 1.25)

<0.001

1.177 (1.122, 1.234)

<0.001

Race: Other vs White

0.79 (0.66, 0.946)

0.010

0.836 (0.739, 0.945)

0.004

0.843 (0.761, 0.934)

0.001

0.83 (0.761, 0.906)

<0.001

Hyperlipidemia

0.736 (0.668, 0.811)

<0.001

0.747 (0.698, 0.8)

<0.001

0.768 (0.725, 0.813)

<0.001

0.769 (0.732, 0.808)

<0.001

Race: Black vs White

0.731 (0.616, 0.869)

<0.001

0.783 (0.698, 0.879)

<0.001

0.832 (0.758, 0.914)

<0.001

0.904 (0.837, 0.977)

0.011

Logistic regression identified age (OR: 1.50 per 10 years, 95% CI: 1.45‐1.55), male gender (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09‐1.24), LOS (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.25‐1.34), anemia (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07‐1.23), history of AMI (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22‐1.45), COPD (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03‐1.19), stroke (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.28‐2.35), and admission to a non‐teaching hospital (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05‐1.23), as important predictors of CV mortality at 1 year, (P < .001 for all, Table S7).

Table 7 describes the outcomes of interest by age group. All comparisons for these outcomes were statistically significant to the point of P < .005 except for HF Readmission of patients aged 75‐84 years old which was significant to the point of P < .05.

Table 7.

Outcomes by age group

Outcome Age group OR 95% CILB 95% CIUB P‐value
All‐cause readmission 75‐84 0.93 0.89 0.97 .002
All‐cause readmission >85 0.84 0.80 0.87 <.001
HF readmission 75‐84 0.95 0.90 1.00 .037
HF readmission >85 0.91 0.87 0.96 <.001
All‐cause death 75‐84 2.13 2.01 2.26 <.001
All‐cause death >85 4.48 4.24 4.73 <.001
CV death 75‐84 2.21 2.03 2.40 <.001
CV death >85 3.96 3.66 4.27 <.001

Abbreviations: CV, Cardiovascular; HF, Heart failure.

The most common causes of readmission at 1 year, present in at least 1% of the patients with history of hypertension, were grouped into 13 categories and are presented in Figure 3. HF was the most common reason for readmission followed by respiratory, heart, and CKD. In the aggregate, all reasons for readmission with rates below 1% accounted for 21.7% of the total. Approximately 4 out of 10 patients (38.7%) discharged following an admission for HF were not readmitted within a year.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HF patients with history of hypertension readmissions by reason for readmission

There were no significant trends for all‐cause and CV mortality. Using a logistic regression model with log2 of number of days to readmission as a predictor of 1‐year all‐cause mortality, we estimated an odds ratio of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.805‐0.827, P < 0,001).

3.2. All‐cause mortality of patients with history of hypertension who were readmitted as compared to those who were not readmitted

All‐cause 3‐year mortality among HF patients discharged alive was significantly higher in patients who were readmitted within 1 year from the index hospitalization (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.26‐1.36, P < .001). The 3‐year all‐cause mortality adjusted for all covariates remained significantly higher in patients who were readmitted vs those not readmitted (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45‐1.54, P < .001). Figure 4 shows the odds ratios for all‐cause mortality at 3 years from the index HF admission comparing patients readmitted versus those who were not readmitted by reason for readmission. Readmission for AMI, CKD, acute infection, or cerebrovascular accident increased the risk of 3‐year mortality.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Odds ratios of 3‐y all‐cause mortality by reason for readmission

Figure 5 presents the adjusted 3‐year mortality rates of HF patients re‐hospitalized for various reasons. Logistic regression determined history of AMI (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.91‐2.55), infections (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.74‐2.32), CKD (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.73‐2.11), stroke (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49‐2.26), and patients with respiratory disease (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19‐1.41, P < .001 for all), as predictors of mortality within 3 years following discharge among patients with a first diagnosis of HF. The effect of these comorbid conditions on all‐cause mortality is higher than that observed in a mixed cohort of HF patients with and without history of hypertension (prior AMI OR:1.42 95% CI: 1.26‐1.60, infection‐related readmission OR:1.32 95% CI: 1.17‐1.49, history of kidney disease OR:1.20 95% CI: 1.10‐1.31, stroke OR:1.15 95% CI: 0.97‐1.35, respiratory disease was non‐significant, respectively).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Odds ratios of 3‐y all‐cause mortality adjusted for all covariates

4. DISCUSSION

In this study, the number of HF readmission of patients with history of hypertension remained relatively stable. All‐cause readmissions increased significantly during the period of observation (P < .001) while all‐cause and CV mortality remained unchanged. This has been attributed to a decreased case fatality of AMI. 22

More than sixty per cent of the patients were readmitted within a year, and patients with longer LOS, anemia, CKD, and COPD were more likely to be readmitted. Patients with history of hypertension who were readmitted had higher 3‐year all‐cause mortality as compared to those who were not readmitted. Hypertension during an emergency department visit is a powerful predictor of future hospitalizations for heart failure during an 18‐month follow‐up period compared with normotension. 23 The findings of Fernandez‐Gasso et al on 30‐day HF readmissions are similar to ours. 24 Also, Bottle et al reported that HF, ischemic heart disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, and diseases of the respiratory or genitourinary system were common reasons for readmission, findings congruent with the results of this report. 25 Likewise, Davis et al, in an all‐payer analysis of HF hospitalizations, found that comorbid conditions similar to those described in this paper were associated with higher rate of readmission up to 30 days. 26 Gulea et al reported that HF patients with COPD were at significantly higher risk of readmission, a finding similar to the present study. 27

Our observation that certain comorbid conditions helped to predict mortality has been documented by previous investigators. Fonarow et al observed that patients with ischemia and those with worsening renal function had a higher mortality at follow‐up. 28 In OPTIMIZE‐HF, high systolic blood pressure was an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality, similar to the findings of the present study. Investigators from both the PRESERVE and OPTIMIZE‐HF studies highlighted that kidney disease is a strong predictor of mortality, an association also reported by Lawson et al in a UK national study. 28 , 29 , 30

Ruigomez et al, reporting on 3516 patients in The Health Improvement Network primary care database, also found higher mortality among patients readmitted for HF. 31 A publication from Alon et al among 9355 HF patients with infection‐related readmissions reported increased mortality over a 10‐year period. 32 Similarly, results from the GREAT registry indicated a higher 90‐day risk of death after a hospitalization for acute infection. 33 Similar to our findings of increased mortality with infections, are the findings of Panhwar et al of an association between influenza and increased inpatient morbidity and mortality. 34 Gerber et al reported that HF markedly increases the risk of death after MI regardless of ejection fraction. 35

In the present study, LOS was associated with higher all‐cause readmission and all‐cause mortality, similar to the results of Khan et al from the EVEREST Trial. 36 Samsky et al in their recent study on trends in readmission and LOS for hospitalized patients with HF in Canada and the United States reported similar results with respect to 30‐day readmission rates. The baseline characteristics of the US cohort are similar with respect to demographics of this study. 5 It appears that being longer inpatient did not result in lowering the chance of readmission and death by stabilizing and better treating the patients. Rather, the reason for the higher case fatality and rate of readmission was probably due to a more advanced staged of HF in these patients. Additionally, longer duration of hospitalization exposes inpatients to frequent and potentially serious complications such as line sepsis, falls after cerebrovascular accidents and pressure ulcers.

Samsky et al did not report on readmission up to 1 year and did not examine mortality. 5 This limitation of the study by Samsky et al is emphasized by Su et al who stated that the 30‐day readmission rate is not an optimal standard for HF management. 37 The effects of comorbid conditions and race observed by these authors are congruent to our results. 38 Su et al recommend that in the future, process indicators will provide additional benefits in the evaluation and treatment of HF, as also reported by Fischer et al and Barbayannis et al. 38 , 39 These studies reported findings similar to ours although they have the drawbacks outlined in introduction, for example, most were from a single‐center, were reviews or meta‐analyses, did not include follow‐up for more than 30 days, did not examine secular changes, and did not report on the long‐term mortality of patients who were readmitted.

Bradley et al and Bilchick et al reported that specific strategies employed before discharge resulted in decreased readmission rates and expense, 40 , 41 while Van Spall et al reported that implementation of a patient‐centered transitional care model did not improve clinical outcomes. 42 However, the results from a review from Delgado‐Passler indicated that a telemanagement program after hospital discharge would result in less frequent rehospitalizations and improvement of the patient's quality of life. 43 Van spall also noticed Nurse home visits and Disease management clinics reduce all‐cause mortality and all‐cause readmissions after hospitalization for HF. 44

The time range of this study did not include enough data to examine the effect of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) since the data collection ended in 2014. Khera and colleagues reported that the announcement or implementation of the HRRP was not associated with an increase in in‐hospital or post‐discharge mortality. 45 This was attributed to the fact that physicians did not adopt strategies that specifically deferred admissions. 46 Conversely, Wadhera et al studying 7.9 million Medicare beneficiaries with HF, MI, and pneumonia published that the HRRP announcement and implementation was associated with an increase in post‐discharge mortality. 47

An important limitation of this study is that confounders such as clinical and laboratory data including hemodynamic status, left ventricular function, physical findings, and hospital programs designed to decrease the rate of readmissions are not included in the dataset. Also, the severity of HF and information on medications used during hospitalization or prescribed at discharge is not included in the dataset. It is possible that the use of different medication classes (eg, diuretics, β‐blockers, or calcium channel blockers) was associated with different rates of readmission and mortality. However, the present study has significant strengths, including that the data are derived from a statewide database, and an assessment of trends over a 15‐year period. Also, this New Jersey statewide database represents a population of approximately 9 million residents that has characteristics similar in ethnicity, age, household mean income, and education to the United States a whole. 48 Moreover, health insurance coverage in NJ resembles that of the United States. 49 The large size of the study that includes every patient admitted with HF in New Jersey over a 15‐year period draws from an unselected and unbiased population gives additional credence to our conclusions.

In summary, this study of 51 141 patients with history of hypertension who were discharged alive with a diagnosis of HF between 2000 and 2014 shows that the number of patients admitted for the first time for HF did not change during the 15 years of the study, that more than sixty per cent of these patients were readmitted within 1 year, and that patients who were readmitted had a significantly higher all‐cause mortality over a 3‐year period than those who were not readmitted. The take home message of this study is that attention to modifiable risk factors such as diabetes and hypercholesterolemia and discharge management to prevent a clinical deterioration after hospitalization would result in improved outcomes. Therefore, physicians treating HF patients with history of hypertension in addition to adhering to current guidelines should safeguard the management of comorbidities and the appropriate discharge planning.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

WJK and JBK conceived the idea and the design of the study, provided revisions to scientific concept of the manuscript, and had the overall supervision of the project. MG was the principal author and provided revisions to scientific concept of the manuscript. DS performed the statistical analysis and interpretation. JC provided revisions to the statistical impression of the analysis. SD helped to draft the manuscript and provided feedback. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supporting information

Supplementary Material

Giakoumis M, Sargsyan D, Kostis JB, Cabrera J, Dalwadi S, Kostis WJ; for the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) Study Group . Readmission and mortality among heart failure patients with history of hypertension in a statewide database. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22:1263–1274. 10.1111/jch.13918

REFERENCES

  • 1. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275:1557‐1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hines AL, Barrett ML, Jiang HJ, Steiner CA. Conditions with the Largest Number of Adult Hospital Readmissions by Payer, 2011: Statistical Brief #172. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006–2014. Apr. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gheorghiade M, Vaduganathan M, Fonarow GC, Bonow RO. Rehospitalization for heart failure: problems and perspectives. J Am Coll Cardio. 2013;61:391‐403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146‐e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:606‐619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Samsky MD, Ambrosy AP, Youngson E, et al. Trends in readmissions and length of stay for patients hospitalized with heart failure in Canada and the United States. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:444‐453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gupta A, Allen LA, Bhatt DL, et al. Association of the hospital readmissions reduction program implementation with readmission and mortality outcomes in heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:44‐53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Huffman MD, Berry JD, Ning H, et al. Lifetime risk for heart failure among white and black Americans: cardiovascular lifetime risk pooling project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1510‐1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. National Center for Health Statistics . Mortality multiple cause‐of‐death, 2017: public use data file documentation ‐ Accessed August 1, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_public_use_data.htm
  • 10. Gheorghiade M, Abraham W, Albert NM, et al. Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. JAMA. 2006;296:2217‐2226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Maggioni AP, Dahlstrom U, Filippatos G, et al. EURObservational research programme: regional differences and 1‐year follow‐up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC‐HF Pilot). Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15:808‐817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. 2005;149:209‐216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fudim M, O'Connor CM, Dunning A, et al. Aetiology, timing and clinical predictors of early vs. late readmission following index hospitalization for acute heart failure: insights from ASCEND‐HF. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:304‐314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Atherton JJ, Hayward CS, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Patient characteristics from a regional multicenter database of acute decompensated heart failure in Asia Pacific (ADHERE International‐Asia Pacific). J Card Fail. 2012;18:82‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Braunstein JB, Anderson GF, Gerstenblith G, et al. Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1226‐1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O'Dowd K, et al. Myocardial infarction data acquisition system study group. Sex differences in the management and long‐term outcome of acute myocardial infarction a statewide study. Circulation. 1994;90(1715):30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kostis WJ, Demissie K, Marcella SW, Shao YH, Wilson AC, Moreyra AE. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 10) Study Group. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1099‐1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wellings J, Kostis JB, Sargsyan D, Cabrera J, Kostis WJ; Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 31) Study Group . Heart failure following myocardial infarction: risk factors and trends in incidence. Am J Cardiol. 2018;122:1‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Campbell KM. Record linkage software in the public domain: a comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a ‘basic’ deterministic algorithm. Health Informatics J. 2008;14:5‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gandhi SK, McKinney JS, Sedjro JE, et al. Temporal trends in incidence and long‐term case fatality of stroke among children from 1994 to 2007. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1923–1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Al Falluji N, Lawrence‐Nelson J, Kostis JB, et al. Effect of anemia on 1‐year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2002;144:636‐641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chen J, Normand SL, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. National and regional trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–2008. JAMA. 2011;306:1669‐1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ayalon‐Dangur I, Rudman Y, Shochat T, Shiber S, Grossman A. Elevated blood pressure during emergency departments visit is associated with increased rate of hospitalization for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Hyperten. 2018;20(1):98‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fernande‐Gasso L, Hernando‐Arizaleta L, Palomar‐Rodriguez JA, Abellan‐Perez MV, Pascual‐Figal DA. Trends, causes and timing of 30‐day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure: 11‐year population‐based analysis with linked data. Int J Cardiol. 2017;248:246‐251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bottle A, Honeyford K, Chowdhury F, Bell D, Aylin P. Factors Associated with Hospital Emergency Readmission and Mortality Rates in Patients with Heart Failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A National Observational Study. Southhampton, UK: NIHR Journals Library; 2018. Jul. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Davis JD, Olsen MA, Bommarito K, et al. All‐payer analysis of heart failure hospitalization 30‐day readmission: comorbidities matter. Am J Med. 2017;130:93.e9‐93.e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gulea C, Zakeri R, Quint JK. Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on readmission after hospitalization for acute heart failure: a nationally representative US cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2019;290:113‐118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, et al. Factors identified as precipitating hospital admissions for heart failure and clinical outcomes: findings from OPTIMIZE‐HF. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:847‐854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Smith DH, Thorp ML, Gurwitz JH, et al. Chronic kidney disease and outcomes in heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: the Cardiovascular Research Network PRESERVE Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:333‐342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lawson CA, Testani JM, Mamas M, et al. Chronic kidney disease, worsening renal function and outcomes in a heart failure community setting: a UK national study. Int J Cardiol. 2018;267:120‐127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ruigomez A, Michel A, Martin‐Perez M, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Heart failure hospitalization: an important prognostic factor for heart failure re‐admission and mortality. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:855‐861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Alon D, Stein GY, Korenfeld R, Fuchs S. Predictors and outcomes of infection‐related hospital admissions of heart failure patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Arrigo M, Gayat E, Parenica J, et al. Precipitating factors and 90‐day outcome of acute heart failure: a report from the intercontinental GREAT registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:201‐208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Panhwar ML, Kalra A, Gupta T, et al. Effect of influenza on outcomes in patients with heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:112‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Enriquez‐Sarano M, et al. Mortality associated with heart failure after myocardial infarction: a contemporary community perspective. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:e002460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Khan H, Greene SJ, Fonarow GC, et al. Length of hospital stay and 30‐day readmission following heart failure hospitalization: insights from the EVEREST trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17:1022‐1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Su A, Al'Aref SJ, Beecy AN, Min JK, Karas MG. Clinical and socioeconomic predictors of heart failure readmissions: a review of contemporary literature. Mayo Clinc Proc. 2019;94:1304‐1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fischer C, Steyerberg EW, Fonarow GC, Ganiats TG, Lingsma HF. A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the association between quality of hospital care and readmission rates in patients in heart failure. Am Heart J. 2015;170:1005 ‐ 1017 e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Barbayannis G, Chiu IM, Sargsyan D, et al. Relation between statewide hospital performance reports on myocardial infarction and cardiovascular outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123:1587‐1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bradley EH, Curry L, Horwitz LI, et al. Hospital strategies associated with 30‐day readmission rates for patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:444‐450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bilchick K, Moss T, Welch T, et al. Improving heart failure readmission costs and outcomes with a hospital‐to‐home readmission intervention program. Am J Med Qual. 2019;34:127‐135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Van Spall HGC, Lee SF, Xie F, et al. Effect of patient‐centered transitional care services on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure: the PACT‐HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:753‐761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Delgado‐Passler P, McCaffrey R. The influences of postdischarge management by nurse practitioners on hospital readmission for heart failure. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18:154‐160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Van Spall HGC, Rahman T, Mytton O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:1427‐1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Khera R, Dharmarajan WY. Association of the hospital readmissions reduction program with mortality during and after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e182777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Khera R, Wang Y, Nasir K, Lin Z, Krumholz HM. Evaluation of 30‐day hospital readmission and mortality rates using regression‐discontinuity framework. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:219‐234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wadhera RK, Joynt Maddox KE, Wasfy JH, Haneuse S, Shen C, Yeh RW. Association of the hospital readmissions reduction program with mortality among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia. JAMA. 2018;320:2542‐2552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.(https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/NJ,US/PST045218/ accessed June 15 2019).
  • 49. Smith JC, Medalia CUS.Census Bureau, Current population reports. Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2014. Available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p60‐253.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2019.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material


Articles from The Journal of Clinical Hypertension are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES