Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0244774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244774

Existence and features of the myodural bridge in Gentoo penguins: A morphological study

Cheng Chen 1, Sheng-bo Yu 1, Yan-yan Chi 1, Guang-yuan Tan 2, Bao-cheng Yan 2, Nan Zheng 1,*, Hong-Jin Sui 1,3,*
Editor: Aldo Corriero4
PMCID: PMC8031436  PMID: 33831002

Abstract

Recent studies have evidenced that the anatomical structure now known as the myodural bridge (MDB) connects the suboccipital musculature to the cervical spinal dura mater (SDM). In humans, the MDB passes through both the posterior atlanto-occipital and the posterior atlanto-axial interspaces. The existence of the MDB in various mammals, including flying birds (Rock pigeons and Gallus domesticus) has been previously validated. Gentoo penguins are marine birds, able to make 450 dives per day, reaching depths of up to 660 feet. While foraging, this penguin is able to reach speeds of up to 22 miles per hour. Gentoo penguins are also the world’s fastest diving birds. The present study was therefore carried out to investigate the existence and characteristics of the MDB in Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua), a non-flying, marine bird that can dive. For this study, six Gentoo penguin specimens were dissected to observe the existence and composition of their MDB. Histological staining was also performed to analyze the anatomic relationships and characteristic of the MDB in the Gentoo penguin. In this study, it was found that the suboccipital musculature in the Gentoo penguin consists of the rectus capitis dorsalis minor (RCDmi) muscle and rectus capitis dorsalis major (RCDma) muscle. Dense connective tissue fibers were observed connecting these two suboccipital muscles to the spinal dura mater (SDM). This dense connective tissue bridge consists of primarily type I collagen fibers. Thus, this penguin’s MDB appears to be analogous to the MDB previously observed in humans. The present study evidences that the MDB not only exists in penguins but it also has unique features that distinguishes it from that of flying birds. Thus, this study advances the understanding of the morphological characteristics of the MDB in flightless, marine birds.

Introduction

The myodural bridge (MDB) is an anatomical structure connecting a suboccipital muscle (RCPmi) to the cervical spinal dura mater (SDM) in humans was identified in the atlanto-occipital interspace by Hack et al. (1995) [1]. Each myodural bridge (MDB) is now described as a fibrous, dense structure connecting the suboccipital musculature to the SDM, including fibers originating from the rectus capitis posterior minor (RCPmi) muscle, the rectus capitis posterior major (RCPma) muscle, the obliques capitis inferior (OCI) muscle, and the nuchae ligament (NL) [27, 13, 14]. It has been proposed that the MDB’s fibers connecting the suboccipital muscles to the cervical SDM [1] might prevent dural infolding, thus maintaining the normal flow of the cerebrospinal fluid within the cisterna magna or cerebellomedullaris cistern [4, 714]. Sui et al. proposed that the MDB may play an important role in modulating the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid [9]. According to also reports, MDB dysfunction may occur with pathological conditions of the RCPmi muscle, resulting in the generation of cervicogenic headache, and other craniofacial disorders [1519].

In recent years, researchers have found that the MDB is a universal structure in mammals [20], including marine mammals (Nephocaena phocaenoides and sperm whales) [21, 22]. The MDB also exists in reptiles (Siamese crocodile and Trachemys scripta elegans) [23, 24], as well as in birds (Rock pigeons and Gallus domesticus) [25, 26]. Therefore the universal existence of the MDB among reptiles, birds, and mammals suggests that the MDB is an evolutionarily conserveed anatomic structure having important biological functions. Moreover, we suggest that there may be structural differences in among various animals to adapt to different environmental conditions.

Penguins are unique birds that can both walk on land and dive and swim in deep water. Penguins are flightless birds, unlike the Rock pigeon and the Gallus domesticus. This marine bird’s ability to swim presents it with different living environments and habits, then those of non-marine birds. Therefore, Gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) will be studied in this paper. This study will provide a comparative anatomical foundation for the future study of the MDB in different animals.

Materials and methods

For this scientific research study, six adult Gentoo penguin specimens from Haichang Ocean Park Holdings., Ltd., that died of natural causes, were obtained with approval from both the Chinese Authorities for Animal Protection and also approved by from the Ethics Committee of Dalian Medical University.

In addition, all experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of Dalian Medical University. The collected Gentoo penguin carcasses were fixed and stored in a 10% formalin solution for subsequent experiments.

Anatomical dissection in the suboccipital region

Three of the six penguin specimens were used for gross dissection. The epidermis was cut longitudinally along the dorsal midline of the specimens, and the suboccipital musculature was fully exposed. The deep suboccipital musclature, including the RCDmi, (analogous to the RCPmi muscle found in humans) and the RCDma, (analogous to the RCPma muscle also found in humans) was exposed. The deep suboccipital muscles (RCDmi and RDCma) were then both cut from the bony occipital crest to observe their connections with the dorsal atlanto-occipital membrane (DAOM, analogous to the PAOM observed in humans) and the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane. Next the DAOM was also cut along its cranial attachment to observe the connection between the DAOM and the SDM. Lateral incision of the posterior arch of the atlas was also made to observe the connection between the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane and the SDM. The photographic materials were taken with a Canon 7D camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

Histological slices and staining

Three specimens were used for histological studies. Tissue samples of the occiput and the cervical region were immobilized in a 10% formalin solution for ten days. Subsequently, the specimens were transferred to Jiang Weizhong’s decalcification solution for decalcification [27]. The Jiang Weizhong’s decalcification solution was changed at three-day intervals until the bone was easily punctured by a needle (21 days). The decalcified tissue samples were then washed overnight in running water, and then dehydrated with increasing grades of alcohol, transparent in xylene, and then infiltrated with melted paraffin, and embedded. A rotary microtome (Leica Micro HM450; Lei Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to cut 8-μm-thick slices. These tissue slices were then divided into three groups: Group 1 slices were used for Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining, which can show the general structural features of the MDB; Group 2 slices were used for Masson trichrome staining (Masson), to detect any collagen fibers in the MDB; Group 3 slices were used for Picrosirius Red (PRS) staining, which can also detect collagen fibers in the MDB, and most importantly, collagen types can be distinguished when viewed with a polarized light microscope. Microscopic examination and photography were carried out with the Nikon ECLIPSE80i research light microscope, and multiple images of each section were stitched together using the Microsoft Image Synthesis Editor of Nikon ECLIPSE80i Image Processing and Analysis System. The results of Picrosirius Red staining were observed with a light microscope as well as a polarized light microscope.

Results

Anatomical dissection of the suboccipital region

The RCDmi and the RCDma muscles, located in the deep suboccipital region, were observed to be tightly connected to each other (Fig 1a). The cranial end of RCDmi muscle attached to the medial part of the occipital crest, and the caudal end attached to the dorsal side of the posterior tubercle of atlas. Moreover multiple dense fibrous tissues were observed to originate from the ventral part of the RCDmi connect to the DAOM (Fig 1b). The DAOM and the SDM were intimately connected to each other by numerous trabecular fibrous bundles (Fig 1c). The cranial end of the RCDma muscle attached to the lateral aspect of the occipital crest, and the caudal end attached to the spinous process of the axis. Some of the dense fibrous bundles originating from the ventral part of the RCDma muscle connected to the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane (Fig 2a). The dorsal atlanto-axial membrane was tightly adheret to the SDM via several dense cord-like fibrous tissue (Fig 2b). This cord-like trabecular fibrous tissue was found in all the three specimens.

Fig 1. Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua), dorsal views of an anatomical dissection of the deep suboccipital space.

Fig 1

a: Superficial view of the deep suboccipital region. The RCDmi and the RCDma are connected tightly. b: The connection between the RCDmi and the DAOM. The ventral surface of the RCDmi is connected by multiple dense fibrous tissues (arrow) to the DAOM (hollow star). c: The connection between the DAOM and the SDM. The DAOM was separated from its cranial attachment at the foramen magnum, and the ventral surface of the DAOM is connected by trabecular fibrous bundles (arrow) to the SDM (hollow triangle). Abbreviation: OCCI = occipital bone; RCDmi = rectus capitis dorsalis minor muscle; RCDma = rectus capitis dorsalis major muscle; DAOM = dorsal atlanto-occipital membrane; SDM = spinal dura mater; C1 = posterior arch of atlas.

Fig 2. Gentoo penguin, dorsal views of an anatomical dissection of the Atlanto-axial interspace.

Fig 2

a: The connection between the RCDma and the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane. The ventral surface of RCDma is connected by dense fibrous bundles (arrow) to the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane. b: The connection between the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane and the SDM. The dorsal atlanto-axial membrane was separated from its posterior arch of atlas, and the ventral surface of the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane is connected by dense cord-like fibrous tissues (arrow) to the SDM (hollow crescent). Abbreviation: RCDmi = rectus capitis dorsalis minor muscle; RCDma = rectus capitis dorsalis major muscle; SDM = spinal dura mater; C1 = posterior arch of atlas.

Histology studies

In the HE-stained sections, multiple dense fibers originating from the ventral anterior aspect of RCDmi pass through the atlanto-occipital interspace (Fig 3a). These fibers extend from the ventral side of the RCDmi muscle and terminate in the DAOM. The DAOM emitted dense fibrous bundles and connected with the SDM passing through several venous sinuses (Fig 3b and 3c). However, different origins of these connective fibers in the atlanto-axial interspace were found. Some of the fibrous bundles originating from the ventral part of the RCDmi connect with the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane directly (Fig 3d). Fibers originating from the ventral aspect of RCDma as well as fibers originating from the OCP fuse together then pass through the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane and terminate on the SDM (Fig 3d). These connective tissue fibers observed between the muscles and the SDM are analogous to the MDB fibers previously observed in humans. In the Masson-stained sections, the muscular fibers were stained red, and the MDB fibers were stained blue (Fig 4). The results of the Masson staining demonstrate that the MDB fibers present in Gentoo penguins are collagenous fibers. In the PSR-stained sections, the fibers of the MDB were stained red under when viewed the ordinary optical microscope (Fig 5a), which implies that the penguin MDB is composed primarily of collagen fibers. Viewed with the polarizing microscope, the fibrous tissues of MDB were stained either red or yellow (Fig 5b–5d). This observation implies that the MDB is composed of primarily type I collagen fibers.

Fig 3. Gentoo penguin, prepared sagittal section of the suboccipital region with stained with HE.

Fig 3

Area within square in a is shown enlarged in b, c, and d. The fibers (arrow) originate from the ventral anterior of RCDmi, extend directly into the atlanto-occipital interspace, then fuse with the DAOM, and the DAOM extends into a fiber bundle through the venous sinus to connect with the SDM (hollow triangle). In the atlanto-axial interspace, the dense fibers bundles (arrow) originating from the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally run ventrally, and integrate into the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane (hollow crescent) together with the dense fibers(filled arrowhead) originating from the RCDma and OCP, and send out dense fibers bundles to closely connect with the SDM. Abbreviation: OCCI = occipital bone; RCDmi = rectus capitis dorsalis minor muscle; OCP = oblique capitis posterior; DAOM = dorsal atlanto-occipital membrane; SDM = spinal dura mater; C1 = atlas; C2 = axial; V = venous sinus.

Fig 4. Gentoo penguin, prepared sagittal section of the suboccipital region with stained with Masson.

Fig 4

Area within square in a is shown enlarged in b, c, and d. The fibers (arrow) originate from the ventral anterior of RCDmi, extend directly into the atlanto-occipital interspace, then fuse with the DAOM, and the DAOM extends into a fiber bundle through the venous sinus to connect with the SDM (hollow triangle). In the atlanto-axial interspace, the dense fibers bundles (arrow) originating from the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally, and integrate into the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane (hollow crescent) together with the dense fibers(filled arrowhead) originating from the RCDma and OCP, and send out dense fibers bundles to closely connect with the SDM. Abbreviation: OCCI = occipital bone; RCDmi = rectus capitis dorsalis minor muscle; OCP = oblique capitis posterior; DAOM = dorsal atlanto-occipital membrane; SDM = spinal dura mater; C1 = atlas; C2 = axial; V = venous sinus.

Fig 5. Gentoo penguin, prepared sagittal section of the suboccipital region with stained with PSR-stained.

Fig 5

Area within square in a is shown enlarged in b, c and d. The fibers (arrow) originate from the ventral anterior of RCDmi, extend directly into the atlanto-occipital interspace, then fuse with the DAOM, and the DAOM extends into a fiber bundle through the venous sinus to connect with the SDM (hollow triangle). In the atlanto-axial interspace, the dense fibers bundles (arrow) originating from the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally, and integrate into the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane (hollow crescent) together with the dense fibers(filled arrowhead) originating from the RCDma and OCP, and send out dense fibers bundles to closely connect with the SDM. Abbreviation: OCCI = occipital bone; RCDmi = rectus capitis dorsalis minor muscle; OCP = oblique capitis posterior; DAOM = dorsal atlanto-occipital membrane; SDM = spinal dura mater; C1 = atlas; C2 = axial; V = venous sinus.

Discussion

In 1995 Hack et al. initially proposed the concept of the MDB [1]. Numerous researchers have since studied the MDB in detail, confirming the MDB’s existence in both humans [114] and animals [2026]. These researchers have further hypothesized about the putative physiological functions of the MDB [819]. The MDB is described as a dense connective tissue bridge connecting the suboccipital musculature to the cervical SDM, while passing through the posterior atlanto-occipital and the altanto-axial interspaces. Therefore, what is unique about the penguin as a marine bird?

According to the observation of the gross anatomy of the penguin, evidenced in the present study, the deep suboccipital musculature of the Gentoo penguin consists of the RCDmi and the RCDma muscles. The cranial ends of both the RCDmi and the RCDma muscles respectively attach to the medial and lateral aspects of the occipital crest. They were intimately related to each other and not easily separated. Interestingly, it was previously found that the RCDmi muscle of the Nephocaena phocaenoides was located on the deep surface of the RCDma, and the RCDmi was observed originating from occiput [21]. Furthermore, the RCDmi of the sperm whale was priviously found to originate from the dorsal aspect of the occipital squama [22]. This spatial distribution of the RCDmi in marine mammals (Nephocaena phocaenoides and sperm whale) is similar to that of the Gentoo penguin. However, the cranial attachments of both the RCDmi and RCDma muscle of the Gentoo penguin are distinct from that observed in other birds (Rock pigeons and Gallus domesticus) [25, 26]. The cranial aspect of the RCDmi attached below the transverse nuchal crest, and the both the RCDmi and RCDma muscle were easily detached [25, 26]. This difference may be related to the survival and feeding behavior of the penguin. These behaviors can be inferred from skull morphology [28].

In the present study, we have confirmed the existence of the MDB in the Gentoo penguin through multiple methods. In the atlanto-occipital interspace of the Gentoo penguins, the dense MDB fibers originated primarily from the ventral aspect of the RCDmi. These fibers extend from the ventral side and extend superiorly to fuse with the DAOM. Then these fibers connect with the SDM passing through the venous sinus. In the atlanto-axial interspace of the Gentoo penguin, the dense MDB fibers originate from the ventral of the RCDmi, the RCDma, and the OCP, all converging to form the MDB, and then passing through the dorsal atlanto-axial membrane, which is tightly connected to the SDM. The arrangement of the fibers of the MDB, observed in the Gentoo penguin is similar to that of other birds [25, 26] and mammals [20]. Although penguins live in different conditions from that of the Rock pigeons and the Gallus domesticus, they all possess an MDB. Once again, the MDB is seen as a highly conserved structure. During the course of biological evolution, structures that are not functionally important tend to degrade, and this evolutionary conservation of the MDB demonstrates the significance of MDB. In addition, the MDB observed in the Gentoo penguin presents as a dense fibrous structure that is composed of type I collagen fibers.

While, being a marine bird, penguin not only has the same type of MDB as that observed in flying birds, but also has the same spatial distribution of the suboccipital muscles like marine mammals. What then are the similarities and differences between the MDB of penguins and marine mammals? Research has confirmed that no DAOM exists in the posterior interspace between the occipital bone and atlas of Nephocaena phocaenoides [21]. The tendinous fibers of the RCDmi observed in the Nephocaena phocaenoides projected through the atlanto-occipital interspace attaching directly to the SDM. This direct connection between the RCDmi and the SDM of the Nephocaena phocaenoides might create a more pronounced effect of the RCDmi muscle on the SDM [21]. Furthermore, the present authors have confirmed that sperm whales have two different origins of their MDB: one origin is from the ODB (occipital dural bridge) which originates from the periosteal surface of the occiput and fuses with the dura mater [22], and the other bridge (MDB) originates from the RCDmi, which transmits the tension from the RCDmi to the dura mater. The MDB stabilizes the dura mater, the spinal cord, and the ODB [22]. The MDB, observed in the atlanto-occipital interspace of penguins, is primarily composed of dense connective tissue fibers originating from the RCDmi muscle. Therefore, there is a type of the MDB, originating from the RCDmi, in penguins, sperm whales, and Nephocaena phocaenoides which all pass through the atlanto-occipital interspace. Moreover, they have similar distribution of suboccipital muscles and the presence of numerous suboccipital venous sinuses. As these different animals live in similar conditions, some of their anatomic structures tend to be similar. This is referred to as the “similar effect”. Therefore, as the penguin is capable of navigating in deep water, this ability maybe associated with cerebrospinal fluid circulation. This also demonstrates that the MDB is a significant and highly conserved anatomic structure.

Interestingly, the sperm whale has an atlas and six fused vertebra (C2-C7) [29], while their MDB exists only in the atlanto-occipital interspace, with extensive venous plexus among the MDB fibers within their atlanto-occipital interspace [22]. As sperm whales swim to great depths, the MDB of these animals may contribute to transferring the tensile forces generated by the suboccipital muscles to the cervical dura mater and thereby continuously alter the volume of the CSF contained within the subarachnoid space, acting as a unique mechanism to facilitate circulation of the CSF [22]. The penguin’s MDB exists in both the atlanto-occipital and the atlanto-axial interspaces, and there are numerous venous sinuses among the MDB fibers. As the penguin dives to great depths, the contraction of MDB fibers via the suboccipital musculature may accelerate venous blood flow back to the heart and also promote cerebrospinal fluid circulation. According to previous research, the penguin can dive to approximately 100 meters within 3 minutes [30, 31]. Therefore, the penguin’s MDB might be a key structure which helps the penguin to maintain normal cerebrospinal fluid circulation during deep dives.

In this study, the present authors validated that there are dense connective tissues (MDB) in both the atlanto-occipital and atlanto-axial interspaces of Gentoo penguin, that are composed of primarily type I collagen fibers. Therefore, this finding implies that the MDB is not only a highly conserved anatomic structure, from an evolutionary point of view, but also has its variant structure for acclimatization. These findings provide supporting evidence for research into the physiological function of the MDB.

Supporting information

S1 File. Staining methods.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Haichang Ocean Park Holdings., Ltd for provision of cadaveric specimens. Thanks to Gary D. Hack of University of Maryland School of dentistry, USA, for helping with language editing.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31871213 to HJS); and Department of Education of Liaoning Province (LZ2020048 to NZ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hack G. D., Koritzer R. T., Robinson W. L., Hallgren R. C., & Greenman P. E. 1995. Anatomic Relation between the Rectus Capitis Posterior Minor Muscle and the Dura Mater.–Spine. 20(23), 2484–2486. 10.1097/00007632-199512000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mitchell BS, Humphreys BK, Osullivan E. 1998. Attachments of the ligamentum nuchae to cervical posterior spinal dura and the lateral part of the occipital bone.–J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 21(3):145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nash L, Nicholson H, Lee AS, Johnson GM, Zhang M. 2005. Configuration of the Connective Tissue in the Posterior Atlanto-Occipital Interspace: A Sheet Plastination and Confocal Microscopy Study.–Spine. 30(12):1359–1366. 10.1097/01.brs.0000166159.31329.92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scali F., Marsili E. S., & Pontell M. E. 2011. Anatomical Connection Between the Rectus Capitis Posterior Major and the Dura Mater.–Spine. 36(25):E1612–E1614. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821129df [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pontell ME, Scali F, Marshall E, Enix D. 2013. The obliquus capitis inferior myodural bridge.–Clin Anat. 26(4):450–454. 10.1002/ca.22134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Palomeque-del-Cerro L., Arráez-Aybar L. A., Rodríguez-Blanco C., Guzmán-García R., Menendez-Aparicio M., & Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á. 2017. A Systematic Review of the Soft-Tissue Connections Between Neck Muscles and Dura Mater.—Spine. 42(1):49–54. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zheng N, Yuan XY, Li YF, Chi YY, Gao HB, Zhao X, et al. 2014. Definition of the to be named ligament and vertebrodural ligament and their possible effects on the circulation of CSF.—PloS one. 9(8): e103451. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rutten HP, Szpak K, van Mameren H, Ten Holter J, de Jong JC. 1997. Anatomic relation between the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle and the dura mater.—Spine. 22(8):924–926. 10.1097/00007632-199704150-00018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sui HJ, Yu SB, Yuan XY, Gao HB, Xu Q, Li XF. 2013. Anatomical study on the connections between the suboccipital structures and the spinal dura mater.—Chinese journal of clinical anatomy. 31:489–490. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pontell ME, Scali F, Enix DE, Battaglia PJ, Marshall E. 2013. Histological examination of the human obliquus capitis inferior myodural bridge.—Ann Anat. 195(6), 522–526. 10.1016/j.aanat.2013.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scali F, Pontell ME, Enix DE, Marshall E. 2013. Histological analysis of the rectus capitis posterior major’s myodural bridge.—Spine J. 13(5):558–563. 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scali F, Pontell ME, Welk AB, Malmstrom TK, Marshall E, Kettner NW. 2013. Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the atlanto-axial interspace.—Clin Anat. 2013 May;26(4):444–449. 10.1002/ca.22094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zumpano MP, Hartwell S, Jagos CS. 2006. Soft tissue connection between rectus capitus posterior minor and the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane: a cadaveric study.—Clin Anat. 19(6):522–7. 10.1002/ca.20220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nan Zheng, Chi Yan-Yan Yang Xiao-Han, Wang Nan-Xing Li Yi-Lin, Ge Yang-Yang, et al. 2018. Orientation and property of fibers of the myodural bridge in humans.—Spine J. 18(6):1081–1087. 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hack GD, Hallgren RC. 2014. Chronic headache relief after section of suboccipital muscle dural connections: a case report.—Headache. 44(1):84–89. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04015.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fernández-de-las-Peñas C., Bueno A., Ferrando J., Elliott J., Cuadrado M., Pareja J. 2007. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of The Morphometry of Cervical Extensor Muscles in Chronic Tension-Type Headache.—Cephalalgia. 27(4), 355–362. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01293.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bogduk N. 2001. Cervicogenic headache: anatomic basis and pathophysiologic mechanisms.—Curr Pain Headache Rep. 5(4):382–386. 10.1007/s11916-001-0029-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fernández-de-las-Peñas C., Cuadrado M. L., Arendt-Nielsen L., Ge H.-Y., Pareja J. A. 2008. A proposed etiology of cervicogenic headache: the neurophysiologic basis and anatomic relationship between the dura mater and the rectus posterior capitis minor muscle.—Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 87(3):197–203.18174844 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yuan XY, Yu SB, Liu C, Xu Q, Zheng N, Zhang JF, et al. 2016. Correlation between chronic headaches and the rectus capitis posterior minor muscle: A comparative analysis of cross-sectional trail.—Cephalalgia. 37(11):1051–1056. 10.1177/0333102416664775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zheng N, Yuan XY, Chi YY, Liu P, Wang B, Sui JY, et al. 2017. The universal existence of myodural bridge in mammals: an indication of a necessary function.—Sci Rep. 7(1):8248. 10.1038/s41598-017-06863-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu P, Li C, Zheng N, Xu Q, Yu SB, Sui HJ. 2017. The myodural bridge existing in the Nephocaena phocaenoides.—PLoS One. 12(3):e0173630. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu P, Li C, Zheng N, Yuan Xy, Zhou Y, Chun P, et al. 2018. The myodural bridges’ existence in the sperm whale.—PLoS One. 13(7):e0200260. 10.1371/journal.pone.0200260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang JH, Tang W, Zhang ZX, Luan BY, Yu SB, Sui HJ. 2016. Connection of the Posterior Occipital Muscle and Dura Mater of the Siamese Crocodile.—Anat Rec (Hoboken). 299(10):1402–1408. 10.1002/ar.23445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huangfu Zhao, Zhang Xiao, Sui Jia-Ying, Zhao Qi-Qi, Yuan Xiao-Ying, Li Chan, et al. 2019. Existence of Myodural Bridge in the Trachemys scripta elegans: Indication of its Important Physiological Function.—Int J Morphol. 37(4):1353–1360. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chukwuemeka Samuel Okoye, Zheng N, Yu SB, Sui HJ. 2018. The myodural bridge in the common rock pigeon (Columbia livia): Morphology and possible physiological implications.—J Morphol. 279(10):1524–1531. 10.1002/jmor.20890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dou YR, Zheng N, Gong J, Tang W, Chukwuemeka Samuel Okoye, Zhang Y, et al. 2019. Existence and features of the myodural bridge in Gallus domesticus: indication of its important physiological function.—Anat Sci Int. 94(2):184–191. 10.1007/s12565-018-00470-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu ZD, Fan QY, Qiu XX, Jiang WZ. 1998. Morphological observation of bone remodeling in adult dogs.—Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University. (01), 108–109. CNKI:SUN:DSJY.0.1998-01-045. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Acosta Hospitaleche C., Tambussi C. 2006. Skull morphometry of Pygoscelis (Sphenisciformes): inter and intraspecific variations.—Polar Biol. 29(9):728–734. 10.1007/s00300-006-0109-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shadwick RE, Gosline JM. 1995. Arterial Windkessels in marine mammals.—Symp Soc Exp Biol. 49:243–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Adams Nigel J, Brown Christopher R. 1983. Diving Depths of the Gentoo Penguin (Pygoscelis papua).—Condor. 85(4):503–504. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Williams T. D., Kato A., Croxall J. P., Briggs D. R., & Barton T. R. 1992. Diving Pattern and Performance in Nonbreeding Gentoo Penguins (Pygoscelis papua) during Winter.—Auk. 109(2), 223–234. 10.2307/4088190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Aldo Corriero

18 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-39348

Existence and Features of the Myodural Bridge in Gentoo Penguins: a morphological study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please consider all the comments of the two reviewers during the manuscript revision.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Aldo Corriero, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Haichang Ocean Park Holdings.,Ltd,.

2.1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2.2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting study that could provide some novel comparative interpretations of a rarely considered anatomical region in animals.

However, there are a number of aspects that need to be improved before it would be acceptable for publication. Most importantly, the discussion currently provides a very limited analysis of the specific anatomy in the target species and unique aspects might relate to specific aspects of species biology. A more thorough analysis of the comparative anatomy of the species included within the discussion and the relationship between this and the potential functional correlates is necessary.

There are numerous grammatical, typographical and formatting issues (some of which i have highlighted within the pdf document) that need to be addressed.

The resolution of the photographs within the figures is currently not adequate, and many of the labels are not legible.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for this addition to the literature regarding the myodural bridges.

In the abstract, cut the sentence "The present authors suggest..." as it does not add to the main effort of this submission. Also, move the sentence "While foraging..." to follow the statement about the Gentoo penguins being the fastest diving birds.

In the introduction, there are several myodural bridges described, so add the word "Each" at the beginning of the second sentence to make it, "Each myodural bridge (MDB) is..."

In the methods on "histological slices and staining" you use both "Picrosirius Red (PRS)" and "Picric acid-Sirius red" to describe the stain. While the two terms are synonymous, you might want to pick one version and use it consistently in this paper.

In the results, the legends for Figures 3, 4, and 5 all have the same typo. I would suggest "In the atlanto-axial interspace, the dense fiber bundles (arrow) originating from the ventral SIDE OF THE RCDmi run ventrally" or something similar. I use the capital letters only for emphasis, they should be lower case in the revision.

In the Discussion, there should be a space between "In" and "1995" in the first sentence. You might want to define "natatores" as swimming birds since some readers (myself included) may not already be familiar with the term. Also, was that sentence meant to end with a question mark? That would make more sense in context. In the fourth paragraph, third sentence, change "found" to "exists". In the fifth paragraph, fourth sentence, change "ocean" to "depths".

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Peter J. Ward

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-39348_reviewer_NW.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0244774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244774.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Mar 2021

Reviewer #1:

1. However, there are a number of aspects that need to be improved before it would be acceptable for publication. Most importantly, the discussion currently provides a very limited analysis of the specific anatomy in the target species and unique aspects might relate to specific aspects of species biology. A more thorough analysis of the comparative anatomy of the species included within the discussion and the relationship between this and the potential functional correlates is necessary.

Thanks for your advice, your advice of great value for our future study. At present, we only carry out a morphological study about the Gentoo penguin of "myodural bridge" to prove that "myodural bridge" universal existence and might have an impotant finction. For the next stage, related functional experiments will be carried out on the morphological abnormalities of different birds. Because "myodural bridge" in different kinds of vertebrates may have diffent morphologial characters due to diferent life style and living envionment. This will be an impotant study direction in our team.

2. There are numerous grammatical, typographical and formatting issues (some of which i have highlighted within the pdf document) that need to be addressed.

minor remarks:

Page 3

1.rephrase for clarity/style; e.g., The myodural bridge (MDB) is a...

Line 40: The myodural bridge (MDB) is an anatomical structure connecting a suboccipital muscle (RCPmi) to the cervical spinal dura mater (SDM) in humans was identified in the atlanto-occipital interspace by Hack et al. (1995) [1].

2.year required

Line 42: ....by Hack et al. (1995) [1].

3.delete,....With these in-depth studies, many researchers now speculate that the MDB may play a significant role in physiological functions.

Line 46: ....and the nuchae ligament (NL) [2-7]. With these in-depth studies, many researchers now speculate that the MDB may play a significant role in physiological functions. It has been proposed....

4.delte....s ....

Line 50: ....play an important role in modulating ....

5. change "rencent" to "also"

Line 51: According to also reports,

Page 4

1. italics not required here

Line 55: ....and sperm whales....

Line 56: ....Siamese crocodile and....

Line 57: ....Rock pigeons and....

2. insert binomial name

Line 64: Gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua)

3. fixed/preserved?

Line 72: ...."immobilized" was changed to "fixed and stored"

Page 5

1. insert relevant reference literature

Line 90: The Jiang Weizhong’s [31]

One literature has been added in this paper

[31]. Liu ZD, Fan QY, Qiu XX, Jiang WZ. 1998 . Morphological observation of bone remodeling in adult dogs. -Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University. (01), 108-109. doi:CNKI:SUN:DSJY.0.1998-01-045.

Page 7

1.was tightly adherent... (past-tense - inconsistent use of tense throughout)

Line 116: ....The dorsal atlanto-axial membrane was tightly adheret to....

2.insert binomial name in figure captions

Line 140: Gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua)

3. "membrane" and "was"

Line 132: membrane was

Page 11

1. Rephrase for clarity

Line 194: Therefore, what is unique about the penguin as a marine bird?

2. formatting issues

Line 200: the Nephocaena phocaenoides

Line 202: sperm whale

Line 204: and sperm whale

Line 206: Rock pigeons and

3. as described in previous research? references required here

Line 207: other birds (Rock pigeons and Gallus domesticus) [23, 24].

[23]. Chukwuemeka Samuel Okoye, Zheng N, Yu SB, Sui HJ. 2018. The myodural bridge in the common rock pigeon ( Columbia livia) : Morphology and possible physiological implications.-J Morphol. 279(10):1524-1531. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20890.

[24]. Dou YR, Zheng N, Gong J, Tang W, Chukwuemeka Samuel Okoye, Zhang Y, Chen YX , Zhang Y, Pi SY, Qu LC, Yu SB, Sui HJ. 2019. Existence and features of the myodural bridge in Gallus domesticus: indication of its important physiological function.-Anat Sci Int. 94(2):184-191. doi: 10.1007/s12565-018-00470-2.

4. Line 209: in what ways? more specific hypotheses based on some documented relevant biological aspects of penguins would be useful here.

At present, we distinguish differences, mainly on the basis of gross anatomy. For the next stage, related functional experiments will be carried out on the morphological abnormalities of different birds.

Page 12

1. formatting issues

Line 220: Rock pigeons

Page 17

1. formatting issues

Line 330: Nephocaena phocaenoides

Page 18

1. formatting issues

Line 340: Trachemys scripta elegans

2.formatting issues

Line 343: Columbia livia

3. formatting issues

Line 347: Gallus domesticus

4. formatting issues

Line 358: Pygoscelis

Page 19

1. formatting issues

Line 362: Pygoscelis papua

2.formatting issues

Line 364: Pygoscelis papua

3. The resolution of the photographs within the figures is currently not adequate, and many of the labels are not legible.

Thank you for your advice. The resolution and label of the image have been modified.

I have uploaded the image file to the "Pre-flight Analysis and Transformation Engine (PACE) Digital Diagnostic Tool" for inspection. I have deepened the color of the image.

Reviewer #2:

1. In the abstract, cut the sentence "The present authors suggest..." as it does not add to the main effort of this submission. Also, move the sentence "While foraging..." to follow the statement about the Gentoo penguins being the fastest diving birds.

Page 2

Line 19: ....interspaces. The present authors suggest that the MDB has important physiological functions in humans. The existence of the MDB....

Line 22: ....660 feet. While foraging, this penguin is able to reach speeds of up to 22 miles per hour. Gentoo penguins are also....

2. In the introduction, there are several myodural bridges described, so add the word "Each" at the beginning of the second sentence to make it, "Each myodural bridge (MDB) is..."

Page 3

Line 42: ....Each myodural bridge (MDB) is now described as a fibrous....

3. In the methods on "histological slices and staining" you use both "Picrosirius Red (PRS)" and "Picric acid-Sirius red" to describe the stain. While the two terms are synonymous, you might want to pick one version and use it consistently in this paper.

Page 6

Line 103: "Picric acid-Sirius red " was changed to "Picrosirius Red (PRS)" here and use it consistently in this paper.

....The results of Picrosirius Red staining were observed with a light microscope as well as a polarized light microscope.

4.In the results, the legends for Figures 3, 4, and 5 all have the same typo. I would suggest "In the atlanto-axial interspace, the dense fiber bundles (arrow) originating from the ventral SIDE OF THE RCDmi run ventrally" or something similar. I use the capital letters only for emphasis, they should be lower case in the revision.

Page 9

Line 159: ....the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally run ventrally....

Line 170: ....the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally run ventrally....

Line 181: ....the ventral side of the RCDmi run ventrally run ventrally....

5.In the Discussion, there should be a space between "In" and "1995" in the first sentence. You might want to define "natatores" as swimming birds since some readers (myself included) may not already be familiar with the term. Also, was that sentence meant to end with a question mark? That would make more sense in context. In the fourth paragraph, third sentence, change "found" to "exists". In the fifth paragraph, fourth sentence, change "ocean" to "depths".

Page 10

Line 188: In 1995 Hack et al. ....

Page 11

Line 194: "natatores" was changed to "main bird" .

....Therefore, what is unique about the penguin as a marine bird?

Page 12

Line 228: "found" was changed to "exists"

Page 13

Line 255: "ocean" was changed to "depths".

Academic editor

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Manuscripts have been ensured to meet PLoS ONE stylistic requirement, including document naming.

2. Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC31871213 to HJS); and Department of Education of Liaoning Province (LZ2020048 to NZ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing Interests Statement

Haichang Ocean Park Holding Co., Ltd. is responsible for the breeding of Gentoo Penguin (Pygoscelis Papua) and provides the basic data related to the penguin specimens for this research group. Another part of their work is the study and popularization of science related to penguins. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Aldo Corriero

24 Mar 2021

Existence and Features of the Myodural Bridge in Gentoo Penguins: a morphological study

PONE-D-20-39348R1

Dear Dr. Chen,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Aldo Corriero, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: All my comments from the first round of review were incorporated appropriately. I have no additional concerns.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Peter J Ward

Acceptance letter

Aldo Corriero

29 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-39348R1

Existence and Features of the Myodural Bridge in Gentoo Penguins: a morphological study

Dear Dr. Chen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Aldo Corriero

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Staining methods.

    (DOC)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-39348_reviewer_NW.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES