Abstract
Unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) is often treated with adrenalectomy, but hypertension resolution rates are variable. A valid estimate of the postoperative normotension rate is necessary to inform the utility of PA testing and treatment. The authors searched MEDLINE In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Prospective adult cohort studies with surgically treated PA that reported resolution of hypertension without the aid of medications were included. Among 2620 abstracts identified by the search, 25 studies in the systematic review with data on 1685 patients were investigated. The pooled proportion of normotension following adrenalectomy was 52% (95% confidence interval, 0.44–0.60). Meta‐regression demonstrated a significant negative association between length of follow‐up and proportion of normotension, with normotension dropping by 6.7% per year of follow‐up (coefficient −0.006; 95% confidence interval, −0.01 to 0.002). Overall, approximately half of the patients experienced hypertension resolution, although this outcome may not be durable in all patients.
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is defined as a form of drug‐resistant and potentially curable hypertension with evidence of excess aldosterone secretion, suppressed plasma renin activity, and often hypokalemia.1 Initially thought to be rare, PA is the leading cause of secondary hypertension. With increased screening and detection, the incidence of PA among hypertensive patients is currently reported at approximately 10%.2 This syndrome has multiple etiologies, including inherited gene mutations,3 development of autoantibodies,4 and ectopic aberrant functional adrenal receptors.5 The clinical management is guided by the definition of unilateral vs bilateral adrenal involvement. With rare exception, adrenalectomy is reserved for unilateral adrenal disease.
The proportion “cured” following adrenalectomy for patients with PA has been reported to range from 0% to 100%.6 However, “cure” is variably defined in the literature. These definitions include normal blood pressure (BP), normal BP without aid of antihypertensive medications, a reduced need for antihypertensive medications, and biochemical normalization, among others. Biochemical normalization of the aldosterone‐renin ratio is likely a necessary part of a definition of “cure.” At this time, however, there is no global consensus on the interpretation of postoperative aldosterone‐renin ratios with the existence of variable assays and cutoffs for even initial diagnosis. Therefore, from the patient's perspective and in the absence of patient‐level clinical end point data, attainment of medication‐free normotension may be the most uniform and recognizable health benefit of surgical PA treatment. Individually reported results of long‐term resolution of hypertension without antihypertensive medications are between 30% and 70% following adrenalectomy.7
The primary aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the proportion of hypertension resolution without the aid of antihypertensive agents following adrenalectomy in patients with PA. To our knowledge, no previous meta‐analysis has been performed. A secondary objective was to identify patient‐level factors reported to be associated with hypertension resolution in patients managed with adrenalectomy.
Methods
Protocol
This systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted and reported in accordance with the Meta‐analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement (Study Protocol S1).8, 9
Data Sources and Search Strategy
We searched the following electronic databases without restrictions: MEDLINE In‐Process & Other Non‐indexed Citations (1946 through January 2016), Embase (1980 through January 2016), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1991 through January 2016). Our search strategy was developed in consultation with an experienced research librarian. Databases were searched using a combination of four search themes: (1) relevant diagnosis (PA), (2) relevant intervention (adrenalectomy, unilateral or bilateral), (3) relevant outcomes (proportion of hypertension resolution), and (4) study designs (observational, cohort studies). The initial search was completed using the Boolean operator “or” to combine and map the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) for each theme. The search themes were combined using the Boolean “and” operator. The MeSH terms and keywords used can be viewed in Study Protocol S2 and the MEDLINE search strategy can be found in Study Protocol S3. We reviewed the reference lists of the search results and key papers to find other potential articles for inclusion.
Study Selection
Two reviewers (J.B. and M.E.) independently evaluated articles in a two‐stage process. We initially reviewed all abstracts retrieved in the electronic database search and identified those abstracts in which adrenalectomy appeared to be used for treatment of adrenal hypertension in adults 18 years or older for full text review. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus.
In the second stage, reviewers (J.B. and M.E.) completed a full text review of articles that met the above inclusion criteria. Full‐text articles were included in the systematic review if they included adults (defined as 18 years or older) with adrenal hypertension, evaluated hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy, and used a prospective cohort study design.
The primary outcome was the resolution of hypertension following adrenalectomy. For the purposes of our study, resolution of hypertension was defined as a normal BP in the absence of antihypertensive medications. Studies were included if they reported prevalence of hypertension resolution as a proportion using our definition.
Any disagreement between reviewers was resolved by consensus and recorded. The kappa (κ) statistic was used to assess agreement between reviewers regarding the inclusion of full‐text articles.10
Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
Both reviewers independently performed data extraction, and disagreement was resolved by consensus. The following data were extracted: number of patients, patient demographics, duration of hypertension, tumor pathology, definition of hypertension resolution, proportion of hypertension resolution, follow‐up rate, and follow‐up duration.
Each reviewer assessed each included publication separately for risk of bias. The evaluated study quality items included description of demographics, baseline differences, enrollment of consecutive patients, study design, follow‐up interval, and participant retention rate. These measures were scored by each reviewer using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS)11 for cohort studies, which is made up of eight dichotomous criteria that assess the selection of cohorts, cohort compatibility, and outcome. To evaluate the selection of the cohort, representation of the cohort, selection of the nonexposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure, and demonstration that the hypertension resolution was not present at the start of the study were evaluated. Comparability between studies was assessed based on whether demographics were described, baseline differences reported, and confounders discussed. The risk of bias for outcome was also assessed using assessment of outcome, follow‐up time interval, and adequacy of follow‐up.
Data Synthesis and Analysis
The proportion of cure was calculated by dividing the number of patients with normotension without antihypertensive medications following adrenalectomy by the total number of patients who underwent adrenalectomy for each study. If the authors reported the proportion of cure following adrenalectomy based on pathology, and therefore presented two separate cohorts, these cohorts were extracted separately. For overall proportion of hypertension resolution, the total sample size was combined.
The pooled proportion of cure from each study was combined across studies using Mantel‐Haenszel‐weighted DerSimonian and Laird random‐effects models.12 Calculating I 2 and Q statistics as well as conducting tests of homogeneity quantified heterogeneity across studies. The I 2 statistic quantifies the percentage of variability between studies due to factors other than sampling variability.13
In an effort to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and to enhance understanding of factors associated with different rates of cure, we conducted a series of stratified analyses to determine whether the pooled proportion of cure varied by type of pathology (aldosterone‐producing adenoma [APA] and bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism [IHA]), mean follow‐up interval (3–12 months, 13–24 months, 25–36 months, and >36 months), and duration of hypertension (<6 years and >6 years). Studies were included in the pathology stratification if all patients in the cohort had the same pathology. Duration of hypertension was stratified using mean duration of hypertension greater than or less than 6 years, as reported in the literature as a predictive factor for resolution of hypertension following adrenalectomy.14
Meta‐regression was performed by duration of follow‐up and duration of hypertension using mean follow‐up (months) and duration of hypertension (months) as continuous variables.
Finally, small‐study effects potentially due to publication bias were assessed through visual inspection of funnel plots and Begg's funnel plot asymmetry test.15 All statistical analysis was performed using Stata, version 11.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).
Results
Search Results
The results of our search strategy are summarized in Figure 1. Among 2620 citations identified for review, 248 met inclusion criteria for full‐text review. Of these 248, 25 articles were included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis, including data on 1685 patients.7, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 There was excellent agreement between reviewers on inclusion of full‐text articles (k=0.93).
Figure 1.

Study flow.
Characteristics of Included Studies
The characteristics and study outcomes of the 25 included cohort studies are shown in the Table. Publication dates ranged from 1985 to 2015, while the number of study participants varied from 17 to 212. The mean age was reported in 17 of the 25 cohorts and ranged from 44.5 to 56.7 years. The duration of preoperative hypertension was reported in 10 of the included cohort studies and ranged from 63.6 to 162 months. The mean serum potassium level preoperatively was reported in 11 of the studies and ranged from 3.1 to 3.5 mmol/L. Of the 25 included prospective cohort studies, 11 reported the mean number of BP medications prior to adrenalectomy and ranged from 1.1 to 3.5. Adrenal venous sampling was reported as a confirmatory tool in establishing the diagnosis for PA patients in four of the included studies, with an additional four studies reporting between 25% and 75% undergoing the confirmatory diagnostic test.
Table 1.
Characteristics and Study Outcomes of the 25 Included Cohort Studies
| Study | Year | Study Location | Participants, No. | Mean Age, y | Mean BMI | Duration of Hypertension, mo | Mean Pre‐Op Potassium. mmol/L | Mean Number of BP Medications Pre‐Op |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernini et al7 | 2012 | Italy | 19 | 45 | 27.7 | 82.8 | 3.1 | 1.1 |
| Catena et al16 | 2007 | Italy | 54 | 53 | 28.6 | 120 | 3.2 | 2.54 |
| Chioncel et al17 | 2012 | Romania | 17 | 44.9 | NR | NR | NR | 3.2 |
| Dobrucki et al18 | 2006 | Poland | 25 | 56.7 | 29.2 | NR | 3.21 | NR |
| Giacchetti et al19 | 2009 | Italy | 42 | 50 | 26.9 | 99.6 | 3.35 | 2.1 |
| Gockel et al20 | 2007 | Germany | 40 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Gordon et al21 | 1989 | Australia | 26 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Grady et al22 | 1996 | United States | 32 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Groth et al23 | 1985 | Switzerland | 50 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Holaj et al24 | 2015 | Czech Republic | 21 | 51.4 | 29.2 | 144 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Horky et al25 | 1987 | Czech Republic | 38 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Lin et al26 | 2012 | Taiwan | 20 | 46 | NR | 82.8 | 3.3 | 1.9 |
| Meria et al27 | 2003 | France | 212 | 48 | NR | 144 | 3.47 | NR |
| Mourad et al28 | 2008 | France | 58 | 52 | NR | 137 | NR | 2.6 |
| Omura et al29 | 2004 | Japan | 50 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Pang et al30 | 2007 | Australia | 62 | 50.2 | NR | NR | NR | 2.6 |
| Rossi et al31 | 2011 | Italy | 19 | NR | NR | NR | 3.4 | NR |
| Rossi et al32 | 2013 | Italy | 110 | NR | 25.9 | NR | 3.19 | 2.7 |
| Rutherford et al33 | 1998 | Australia | 68 | 51 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Shen et al34 | 2009 | China | 163 | 42 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Sukor et al35 | 2010 | Australia | 22 | 50 | NR | NR | 3.1 | 2.7 |
| Walz et al36 | 2008 | Germany | 183 | 49.6 | NR | 122.4 | NR | NR |
| Worth et al37 | 2015 | United States | 58 | 52.6 | 31.5 | 162 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Wu et al38 | 2015 | China | 148 | 56.3 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Zhang et al39 | 2004 | China | 130 | 44.5 | NR | 63.6 | NR | NR |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; NR, not reported.
Risk of Bias Assessment
A summary of the methodological details of the cohort studies is presented in Table S1. As these were surgical cohorts, they were limited by not having a nonexposed (ie, medically managed) cohort. Of all other evaluated indicators of cohort selection, the included studies were strong, as the cohorts were made up of patients referred to tertiary centers for management of PA, they used surgical records, and all patients had hypertension at the time of adrenalectomy. All studies reported the primary outcome (proportion of hypertension resolution), as it was one of the inclusion criteria. The mean follow‐up time interval was not reported in several studies. The proportion of patients who underwent follow‐up was greater than or equal to 85% in all but one study.
Proportion of Hypertension Resolution
A total of 1685 patients were included in the 25 cohort studies reporting a pooled estimate of proportion of hypertension resolution of 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.60; Figure 2). The data were heterogeneous (I 2=92.1%).
Figure 2.

Overall proportion of hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy.
Exploration for Sources of Heterogeneity
Stratification was conducted to determine sources of heterogeneity. For the cohorts reporting a mean duration of hypertension of less than 6 years, the proportion was 52% (95% CI, 0.25–0.79; I 2=90.8%; Figure S1) compared with 41% (95% CI, 0.29–0.48; I 2=88.5%; Figure S1) for cohorts with means ≥6 years. The meta‐regression that examined the association of duration of hypertension in months as a continuous variable with proportion cured was not significant (coefficient, −0.0007; standard error, 0.001; 95% CI, −0.003 to 0.002 [P=.54]; Figure S2).
From the included studies, 12 reported the proportion of hypertension resolution for cohorts with APA pathology exclusively and this was found to be 54% (95% CI, 0.41–0.67; I 2=91.1%; Figure S3). This is compared with two cohorts that reported rates for IHA pathology exclusively, and found that all patients with IHA remained hypertensive following adrenalectomy.
The results of this meta‐analysis were also stratified by follow‐up interval. For included studies with mean follow‐up intervals greater than 36 months, the prevalence of hypertension resolution was 42% (95% CI, 0.33–0.51; I 2=79.1%; Figure S4) compared with 57% for follow‐up intervals of 25 to 36 months (95% CI, 0.44–0.70; I 2=62.5%; Figure S4), 60% for follow‐up intervals of 13 to 24 months (95% CI, 0.20–1.01; I 2=92.8%; Figure S4), and 60% (95% CI, 0.20–1.01; I 2=92.8%; Figure S4) for follow‐up intervals less than 12 months. Meta‐regression examining the association between mean follow‐up interval in months for studies that followed their patients for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively and the proportion of hypertension resolution was significant (coefficient −0.0056, standard error 0.0020; 95% CI, −0.0093 to −0.0019 [P=.006]; Figure 3). Practically, this analysis shows that with each year of follow‐up, there is a 6.7% drop in the proportion of patients who remain normotensive without medications.
Figure 3.

Meta‐regression of proportion of hypertension resolution by follow‐up interval.
Small‐Study Effects Analyses
Analyses of the effects of small studies were completed. There was no evidence of publication bias when assessed through visual inspection of funnel plots (Figure S5) and Begg and Mazumdar (rank correlation) test for asymmetry.15
Discussion
This systematic review and meta‐analysis of 25 cohort studies suggests that approximately half of the patients who undergo adrenalectomy for the treatment of unilateral PA will experience normotension without the use of antihypertensive medications. However, our analysis suggests that this may not be a durable outcome in all patients over the course of prolonged follow‐up. This does not necessarily mean that the patients were not “cured” of PA or that they derived no lasting benefit from specific PA treatment; rather, as the mean follow‐up interval in these studies was as long as 77 months, it is possible that some patients developed either essential hypertension or another disorder associated with hypertension such as chronic kidney disease. PA is known to carry a high risk of causing renal impairment and such renal injury may not be fully reversible even upon resolution of the PA state.40 It is also conceivable that a prolonged delay in initial PA diagnosis could contribute to permanent renal injury with persistent hypertension even after definitive correction of the PA state. Biochemical recurrence of PA remains a theoretical possibility but is not widely recognized or reported in other literature sources. Contralateral suppression of the remaining adrenal gland leading to normotension in the postoperative period with a recurrence of hypertension once the remaining adrenal gland has recovered could also explain this finding. Long‐term biochemical monitoring of aldosterone levels may help further explain any underlying mechanisms of recurrent hypertension. The possibility of nonpersistent hypertension resolution should not be interpreted as an argument against adrenalectomy since a comparative group of the alternate strategy of primary medical therapy has not been studied in a similar fashion. Primary medical therapy has its own costs and potential complications and requires regular long‐term clinical follow‐up, all of which would need to be considered in a true comparison to surgical management.
Recent efforts have focused on identifying predictive factors that may determine which patients obtain hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy, and the presence or absence of such factors may account for some of the residual heterogeneity observed in this review. These proposed factors include age at time of surgery, sex, pathology, duration of hypertension, presence of hypokalemia at diagnosis, number of antihypertensive drugs required preoperatively, and positive response to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) such as spironolactone.19, 41 Again, these studies are often limited by virtue of their derivation from small cohorts with relatively short‐term follow‐up.
A predictive model called the aldosteronoma resolution score was developed by Zarnegar and colleagues14 that features four predictive factors: number of antihypertensive medications preoperatively, duration of hypertension, body mass index, and sex. One short‐term study in Japanese patients has suggested that the score has reasonable accuracy to predict normotension.42 Our large meta‐analysis and stratified analyses do not support using the duration of hypertension as a predictive factor. Rather, our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference between the duration of hypertension preoperatively and the proportion of hypertension resolution. This is a novel finding that may be explained by the fact that prior studies of predictive factors are necessarily based on retrospectively analyzed clinical case data. The actual “onset” of hypertension in a given individual may be entirely unknown or inaccurate if dependent on patient recall. Thus, the duration of preexisting hypertension may still be a truly predictive factor for future hypertension resolution but its analysis through patient chart data abstraction may be inadequate to accurately determine the exact relationship. This is a key consideration when developing future guidelines and argues for the importance of a workup of all patients with secondary hypertension regardless of how long they have had a diagnosis of hypertension. The three other predictive factors included in this model could not be evaluated in our meta‐analysis without patient‐level data.
Our meta‐analysis supports pathology as being a possible predictive factor for a medication‐free BP outcome. From the studies that qualified for this meta‐analysis, two suggested a 0% hypertension resolution rate when unilateral adrenal hyperplasia was the final pathology. This result is highly preliminary as it was derived from only six patients, and therefore has low power, but it may suggest that the magnitude of benefit may be smaller for patients with unilateral IHA pathology.23, 25 Other papers not included in the meta‐analysis do appear to show clinical benefit to surgical intervention even with diffuse hyperplasia as the pathology.43 Recent work in functional histopathology has now shown that the traditional gross cellular differentiation between adenoma and hyperplasia may sometimes be functionally incorrect and therefore future studies that aim to determine pathology‐linked clinical outcomes will likely need to use a more modern and functional approach to the subtype definitions.44
Study Limitations
There are a number of limitations of this study. The studies included were all prospective, surgical cohorts but patient selection bias cannot be fully excluded. One of the major challenges in the management of PA is making the correct diagnosis. Patients often present for workup of PA on several antihypertensive medications, including MRAs, which can complicate the interpretation of the aldosterone‐renin ratio. Another important point is that diagnostic techniques have evolved over time including the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which was likely underused in many of the older cohorts, in comparison to present recommendations. While this raises the possibility of inappropriate selection of patients for surgery, it may also have limited the inclusion of unilateral PA patients who would have benefitted from surgery but were not treated for want of a clear diagnosis. Future outcome‐oriented study cohorts should have the diagnosis supported by AVS and in doing so, will ensure that only truly unilateral surgical cohorts are included in analysis.
Second, we were unable to access patient‐level data and therefore were limited in the outcome predictors that could be analyzed. With patient‐level data, it would be possible to determine the predictive impact of factors such as younger age, degree of hypokalemia, treatment with MRAs, and number of antihypertensive medications, which have all been reported as useful in predicting outcome following adrenalectomy.45
Third, normotension was achieved in each of these cohorts, but biochemical cure was not reported in many, and long‐term clinical outcomes were not assessed. Several studies have looked at the impact of PA compared with essential hypertension and found that patients with PA have significant cardiac and renal complications compared with hypertension alone.46, 47, 48 This suggests that biochemical cure as an outcome may be of equal or greater significance for the overall health of these patients and that the maximal benefits of PA management might only be realized when the aldosterone excess is removed in addition to hypertension control. As PA registries are developed in the future, it will be useful for postoperative biochemical measures of renin and aldosterone to be included as an important variable for inclusion of reports of surgical treatment outcomes.
Fourth, these are surgical cohorts that do not include patients who either choose to be medically managed or are not offered surgery for some other reason, such as comorbid medical conditions. Therefore, our pooled estimate of cure is limited to only those who are selected to undergo surgery and we are unable to draw inferences about the probability of the resolution of hypertension in an unselected group of patients with PA.
The final limitation of this study is that we focused on a specific single primary outcome with unproven impact on hard patient outcomes. However, as it would be difficult to conduct a large, prospective, clinical event–driven, randomized controlled trial comparing surgical and medical interventions for the treatment of PA, we need to rely on the published historical data with meta‐analysis. The percentage of patients who experience clinical benefits, including improvement in BP management and reduction in the number of antihypertensive medications, is likely higher than the proportion of complete resolution reported in this meta‐analysis. Less than half of the included studies published postoperative biochemical data. It was not possible to analyze biochemical cure to confirm both the diagnosis and resolution of PA in these cohorts without standardization of the aldosterone‐renin ratio measurement and interpretation between centers.
Since not all patients who undergo surgery have hypertension resolution and many patients with PA have well‐controlled BP with MRA drugs,49 there is an ongoing debate as to the overall clinical importance of investing the time and effort needed to pursue a PA diagnosis to the point of determining surgical candidacy. In most centers, patients with PA will require anatomical imaging and adrenal vein sampling to define PA as either bilateral or unilateral adrenal disease, with patients with unilateral forms being offered surgery.50 Early data suggest that clinical outcomes may be superior in patients who undergo adrenalectomy but the steps required to define surgical candidates have both risks and costs.51 For a disease such as PA with seemingly high prevalence, interventional cost and risk‐benefit analyses will be highly dependent on accurate determination of the beneficial outcomes seen across multiple populations of affected patients.
The bulk of the global published experience to date with surgery for PA is that just over 50% of patients achieve medication‐free normotension. Larger, longer studies may help to better define predictors of outcomes, and prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm patient‐level benefits of treatments. Until then, cost‐effectiveness studies may use the present data for the estimates of benefit and individual patients may be counseled as to their expected BP outcomes with surgical intervention.
Conclusions
The costs associated with the workup and management of PA are not negligible.52 It is therefore important to have an accurate understanding of the clinical benefits for the patient, including control of hypertension and quality of life, as well as the impact on the healthcare system such as reduction in follow‐up visits and postoperative medications associated with performing adrenalectomy in these patients.35 The results of this meta‐analysis could be used to inform a future economic analysis. This pooled estimate of the magnitude of surgical benefit may be useful in patient counseling, guideline writing, and possibly future economic models of different PA treatment approaches.
Sources of Funding
DMR is supported by an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Population Health Investigator Award.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Supporting information
Study Protocol S1. Focused Question:
Study Protocol S2. Comprehensive Search Themes
Study Protocol S3. MedLine Search Strategy
Table S1. Methodological Details
Table S2. Stratification of Sources of Heterogeneity
Figure S1. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution Stratified by Duration of Hypertension Preoperatively
Figure S2. Duration of Hypertension Preoperatively as a Continuous Variable
Figure S3. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution for Aldosterone‐Producing Adenomas
Figure S4. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution Stratified by Follow‐Up Interval
Figure S5. Funnel Plot.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Diane Lorenzetti, Research Librarian, University of Calgary.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18:1205–1212. DOI: 10.1111/jch.12916. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
- 1. Conn JW. Presidential address. I. Painting background. II. Primary aldosteronism, a new clinical syndrome. J Lab Clin Med. 1955;45:3–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Piaditis G, Markou A, Papanastasiou L, et al. Progress in aldosteronism: a review of the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in pre‐hypertension and hypertension. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172:R191–R203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Monticone S, Else T, Mulatero P, et al. Understanding primary aldosteronism: impact of next generation sequencing and expression profiling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;399:311–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Williams TA, Mulatero P, Bidlingmaier M, et al. Genetic and potential autoimmune triggers of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2015;66:248–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ye P, Mariniello B, Mantero F, et al. G‐protein‐coupled receptors in aldosterone‐producing adenomas: a potential cause of hyperaldosteronism. J Endocrinol. 2007;195:39–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tan YY, Ogilvie JB, Triponez F, et al. Selective use of adrenal venous sampling in the lateralization of aldosterone‐producing adenomas. World J Surg. 2006;30:879–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bernini G, Bacca A, Carli V, et al. Cardiovascular changes in patients with primary aldosteronism after surgical or medical treatment. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012;35:274–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta‐analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta‐analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed May 6, 2015.
- 12. Egger M, Davey‐Smith G, Altman D. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context, 2nd edn. London, England: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zarnegar R, Young WF Jr, Lee J, et al. The aldosteronoma resolution score: predicting complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for aldosteronoma. Ann Surg. 2008;247:511–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Catena C, Colussi G, Lapenna R, et al. Long‐term cardiac effects of adrenalectomy or mineralocorticoid antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2007;50:911–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chioncel V, Paun D, Amuzescu B, Sinescu C. Evolution features of hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism ‐ Prospective study. J Med Life. 2012;5:354–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dobrucki T, Peczkowska M, Janaszek‐Sitkowska H, et al. Wptyw leczenia na wybrane parametry kliniczne i biochemiczne u chorych z pierwotnym hiperaldosteronizmem ‐ odlegta obserwacja. Nadcisnienie Tetnicze. 2006;10:392–402. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Giacchetti G, Ronconi V, Rilli S, et al. Small tumor size as favorable prognostic factor after adrenalectomy in Conn's adenoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160:639–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gockel I, Heintz A, Polta M, Junginger T. Long‐term results of endoscopic adrenalectomy for Conn's syndrome. Am Surg. 2007;73:174–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gordon R, Hawkins PG, Hamlet SM, et al. Unexpected incidence of low blood pressure 2 years after unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1989;16:281–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Grady RW, Kaylor WM, Lee JC, et al. Renal pathology in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism secondary to an adrenal cortical adenoma. Urology. 1996;48:369–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Groth H, Vetter W, Stimpel M, et al. Adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: a long‐term follow‐up study. Cardiology. 1985;72:107–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Holaj R, Rosa J, Zelinka T, et al. Long‐term effect of specific treatment of primary aldosteronism on carotid intima‐media thickness. J Hypertens. 2015;33:874–882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Horky K, Widimsky J Jr, Hradec E, et al. Long‐term results of surgical and conservative treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1987;90:337–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lin YH, Lin LY, Chen A, et al; TAIPAI Study Group. Adrenalectomy improves increased carotid intima‐media thickness and arterial stiffness in patients with aldosterone producing adenoma. Atherosclerosis. 2012;221:154–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Meria P, Kempf BF, Hermieu JF, et al. Laparoscopic management of primary hyperaldosteronism: clinical experience with 212 cases. J Urol. 2003;169:32–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mourad J, Girerd X, Milliez P, et al. Urinary aldosterone‐to‐active‐renin ratio: a useful tool for predicting resolution of hypertension in patients with aldosterone‐producing adenomas. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:742–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Omura M, Saito J, Yamaguchi K, et al. Prospective study on the prevalence of secondary hypertension among hypertensive patients visiting a general outpatient clinic in Japan. Hypertens Res. 2004;27:193–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pang TC, Bambach C, Monaghan JC, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for hyperaldosteronism. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:768–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rossi E, Regolisti G, Perazzoli F, et al. Intraprocedural cortisol measurement increases adrenal vein sampling success rate in primary aldosteronism. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:1280–1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Rossi GP, Cesari M, Cuspidi C, et al. Long‐term control of arterial hypertension and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with treatment of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2013;62:62–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rutherford JC, Taylor WL, Stowasser M, Gordon RD. Success of surgery for primary aldosteronism judged by residual autonomous aldosterone production. World J Surg. 1998;22:1243–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shen Z, Wang X, Zhu Y, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic partial adrenalectomy for aldosteronoma: clinical experiences with 163 cases. Urology. 2009;74(suppl. 4A):S175. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sukor N, Kogovsek C, Gordon RD, et al. Improved quality of life, blood pressure, and biochemical status following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1360–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Walz MK, Gwosdz R, Levin SL, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in Conn's syndrome caused by adrenal adenomas or nodular hyperplasia. World J Surg. 2008;32:847–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Worth PJ, Kunio NR, Siegfried I, et al. Characteristics predicting clinical improvement and cure following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism in a large cohort. Am J Surg. 2015;210:702–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wu VC, Huang KH, Peng KY, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of somatic mutation in aldosterone‐producing adenoma‐Taiwanese population. Sci Rep 2015;5:11396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhang X, He H, Chen Z, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of primary aldosteronism with report of 130 cases. Chin J Surg. 2004;42:1093–1095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Iwakura Y, Morimoto R, Kudo M, et al. Predictors of decreasing glomerular filtration rate and prevalence of chronic kidney disease after treatment of primary aldosteronism: renal outcome of 213 cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:1593–1598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hennings J, Andreasson S, Botling J, et al. Long‐term effects of surgical correction of adrenal hyperplasia and adenoma causing primary aldosteronism. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:133–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Utsumi T, Kawamura K, Imamoto T, et al. High predictive accuracy of Aldosteronoma Resolution Score in Japanese patients with aldosterone‐producing adenoma. Surgery. 2012;151:437–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Citton M, Viel G, Rossi GP, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment of primary aldosteronism. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:325–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Volpe C, Hamberger B, Hoog A, et al. Primary aldosteronism: functional histopathology and long term follow up after adrenalectomy. Clin Endo. 2015;82:639–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sawka AM, Young WF Jr, Thompson GB, et al. Primary aldosteronism: factors associated with normalization of blood pressure after surgery. Ann Int Med. 2001;135:258–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Rossi GP, Sechi LA, Giacchetti G, et al. Primary aldosteronism: cardiovascular, renal and metabolic implications. TEM. 2008;19:88–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sechi LA, Colussi G, di Fabio A, Catena C. Cardiovascular and renal damage in primary aldosteronism: outcomes after treatment. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:1253–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Born‐Frontsberg E, Reincke M, Rump LC, et al. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular comorbidities of hypokalemic and normokalemic primary aldosteronism: results of the German Conn's registry. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2009;94:1125–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Potthoff SA, Beuschlein F, Vonend O. Primary hyperaldosteronism—diagnostic and treatment. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012;137:2480–2484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, et al. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. JCEM. 2008;93:3266–3281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kline GA, Pasieka JL, Harvey A, et al. Medical or surgical therapy for primary aldosteronism: post‐treatment follow‐up as a surrogate measure of comparative outcomes. Ann Surg Onc. 2013;20:2274–2278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Rossi GP, Barisa M, Allolio B, et al. The adrenal vein sampling international study for identifying the major subtypes of primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrin Metab. 2012;97:1606–1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Study Protocol S1. Focused Question:
Study Protocol S2. Comprehensive Search Themes
Study Protocol S3. MedLine Search Strategy
Table S1. Methodological Details
Table S2. Stratification of Sources of Heterogeneity
Figure S1. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution Stratified by Duration of Hypertension Preoperatively
Figure S2. Duration of Hypertension Preoperatively as a Continuous Variable
Figure S3. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution for Aldosterone‐Producing Adenomas
Figure S4. Proportion of Hypertension Resolution Stratified by Follow‐Up Interval
Figure S5. Funnel Plot.
