Abstract
We have formerly shown that glycoprotein C (gC) of Gallid alphaherpesvirus 2, better known as Marek’s disease (MD) alphaherpesvirus (MDV), is required for interindividual spread in chickens. Since gC is conserved within the Alphaherpesvirinae subfamily, we hypothesized gC was important for interindividual spread of other alphaherpesviruses. To test this hypothesis, we first generated a fluorescent protein tagged clone of Gallid alphaherpesvirus 3 MD vaccine strain 301B/1 to track virus replication in cell culture and chickens using fluorescent microscopy. Following validation of this system, we removed the open reading frame of 301B/1 gC from the genome and determined whether it was required for interindividual spread using experimental and natural infection studies. Interindividual spread of MD vaccine 301B/1 was abrogated by removal of 301B/1 gC. Rescuent virus in which 301B/1 gC was inserted back into the genome efficiently spread among chickens. To further study the conserved function of gC, we replaced 301B/1 gC with MDV gC and this virus also efficiently spread in chickens. These data suggest the essential function of alphaherpesvirus gC proteins is conserved and can be exploited during the generation of future vaccines against MD that affects the poultry industry worldwide.
Subject terms: Vaccines, Virology
Introduction
Herpesviruses have co-evolved with their respective hosts for millions of years. In most cases, each herpesvirus and host have reached a relatively stable relationship with many hosts infected with multiple herpesviruses, including humans that currently have nine associated herpesviruses1. Although there is a tremendous amount of information on herpesvirus-host interactions in cell culture, little is known about their relationships pertaining to interindividual spread and the viral and cellular genes that mediate this important aspect of the virus lifecycle. This is primarily due to the difficulty of studying the mechanistic nature of human herpesviruses in humans, as well as a lack of many natural animal models. For this, we turn to natural herpesvirus-host models to address questions on interindividual spread and dissemination in populations.
For much of the 1990s, there was a tremendous amount of attention paid to conserved herpesvirus glycoprotein C (gC) homologues due to their high expression levels and immunogenicity, where they were shown to perform multiple functions in vitro. Some of the functions identified include primary attachment of cell-free virus to heparin sulfate (HS)- and chondroitin-like glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on the surface of cells2,3, and involvement in late steps of virus egress from cultured cells2,4. Although gC is not essential for most herpesviruses studied thus far, it significantly increases the efficiency of infection by providing an additional binding mechanism5 and helps shield the virus from antibody neutralization6. In addition to viral attachment and egress, gC homologues are thought to have immune evasion functions mediated by binding to and inhibiting the action of complement component C37–12, as well as a role in chemokine-mediated leukocyte migration13. Similar to MDV, gC homologues for herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) appear to play a minor role in tissue culture model systems but are critical for HSV-1 and VZV replication in human skin cells using the SCID-hu mouse model14 suggesting gC homologs may perform conserved functions during natural infection of the host. However, studies on the role of gC homologs are limited due to a lack of natural animal host model systems.
We have formerly shown that gC of Marek’s disease alphaherpesvirus (MDV) is dispensable for in vitro and in vivo replication but is required for interindividual spread from chicken to chicken15–18. MDV causes Marek’s disease in chickens, presenting with severe clinical symptoms including the development of solid lymphomas in the viscera and other organs; metabolic dysfunction; and neurological signs like paralysis and ataxia19. It is a major economic problem in the poultry industry due to its global distribution and transmissibility20. Natural infection of MDV begins through the respiratory route by inhalation of infectious virus where pulmonary B lymphocytes and macrophages or dendritic cells21 are initially infected and transport the virus to lymphoid organs. Primary cytolytic infection ensues in activated T lymphocytes recruited to the sites of infection, which become the primary cell type infected, and latency is established in these cells. Depending on the line of chicken or MDV strain, oncogenic transformation of latently infected T cells results in lymphoma formation that is ultimately a dead-end for the virus. Important for dissemination in the population, migrating infected cells transport MDV to feather follicle (FF) epithelial (FFE) cells in the skin, where infectious cell-free virus is shed into the environment, and the virus life cycle can repeat in new hosts.
There are currently eight herpesviruses identified in avian species with all characterized within the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae in the Herpesviridae family1. Of the eight avian herpesviruses, six belong to the Mardivirus genus of which MDV or Gallid alphaherpesvirus 2 (GaHV-2) is the prototypic virus within this genus. MD is controlled through vaccination with attenuated MDV strains and homologous non-oncogenic avian herpesviruses, including Gallid alphaherpesvirus 3 (GaHV-3) and turkey herpesvirus (HVT: Meleagrid alphaherpesvirus; MeHV-1). However, the current vaccines are efficient at reducing tumor formation and disease but not block interindividual spread of virulent MDV resulting in increasing virulence over the decades22. It is generally accepted that GaHV-3 and HVT have similar interindividual spread pathogeneses as MDV.
Here, we hypothesized that the absolute requirement of gC for MDV interindividual spread is conserved among other avian herpesviruses. To test this hypothesis, we used a recently generated infectious bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone of the MD vaccine strain 301B/123 in experimental and natural infections of chickens to determine whether 301B/1 gC is required for 301B/1 transmission. Our results conclusively showed that 301B/1 gC is required for interindividual spread and that MDV gC could compensate for 301B1 gC in this process. These results suggest the importance of gC homologs in interindividual spread may be a conserved function and draws importance to studying this glycoprotein during interindividual spread of other herpesviruses.
Results
Generation of recombinant (r)301B/1 expressing pUL47mRFP (r301B47R)
We and others have shown that fusing fluorescent proteins to the C-terminus of alphaherpesvirus pUL47 (VP13/14) allows the visualization of infected cells and does not affect replication in cell culture and in vivo for numerous herpesviruses24–28. Therefore, we inserted monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) at the C-terminus of the pUL47 in a recently described BAC clone of 301B/123 to generate r301B47R (Fig. 1A). RFLP analysis confirmed the integrity of the BAC clones as the predicted banding pattern was observed described in the figure (Fig. 1B). In addition, DNA sequencing was used to confirm that each clone was correct at the nucleotide level (data not shown) using primers specific for each gene (Table 1).
Table 1.
Genea | Directionb | Sequence (5′ → 3′) |
---|---|---|
UL47cTerm | Forward | CCTTCTCGGCACGCTAGCCT |
Reverse | TTTTGGGACGCGAAGTGGCC | |
UL44 (gC) | Forward | GCTAAGTTGCGCAGGCAGAG |
Reverse | GGGCCGGATGTACCTATACG | |
Forward | GACCCGCCTCGGTCGACG | |
Reverse | ACATAGACGGAGCCCGGTGG | |
Forward | GCCATCGACGAGGGGGT | |
Reverse | GCCGGAATACTTGACGGGTTG |
aGene sequenced with the set of primers.
bDirectionality of the primer.
Replication of v301B47R in cell culture
Following reconstitution of r301B/1 and r301B47R resulting in v301B/1 and v301B47R, respectively, we first tested in vitro growth properties using plaque size assays. Consistent with fusing fluorescent proteins to pUL47 in other herpesviruses, there was no change in replication between parental v301B/1 and v301B47R during cell culture replication in chicken embryo cells (CEC) cultures (Fig. 2A). Additionally, while reconstituting r301B47R in DF-1-Cre (data not shown) and propagating in CEC cultures, mRFP was abundantly expressed that could be visualized using fluorescent microscopy (Fig. 2B). Expression of pUL47mRFP was almost exclusively found in the nucleus, consistent with MDV, though the expression levels appeared to more abundant than observed for MDV25,29. Western blotting using anti-mRFP antibody showed mRFP expression was fused to the pUL47 since mRFP alone is ~ 26 kDa in size, while fused to pUL47 would create ~ 115 kDa protein (Fig. 2C). These results show that fusing mRFP to the C-terminus of pUL47 of 301B/1 resulted in no change in viral replication in tissue culture and allowed the direct visualization of 301B/1 replication in cells. This data is consistent with former studies fusing fluorescent proteins to pUL47 homologs25–27,30.
v301B47R as a tool for tracking virus in chickens
Next, we tested the ability of v301B47R to replicate and interindividual spread in chickens. To do this, ten chickens were experimentally infected with 4000 PFU v301B47R and housed with ten naïve contact chickens for nine weeks to measure natural infection (interindividual spread). First, we were interested in whether we could directly identify infected birds based on fluorescence in plucked feathers as has been previously done in our laboratory for MDV32. Like our former results with fluorescently tagged MDV, feather follicles were easily identified from feathers (Fig. 2D) in most experimentally infected chickens at 14 to 28 days post-infection (dpi) with a total of 90% of birds positive for v301B47R by 21 dpi (Fig. 2E). Staining of FFs showed feathers positive for pUL47mRFP were also positive for anti-GaHV-3 glycoprotein B (Y5.9), while negative for anti-HVT glycoprotein B (L78.2). These results show that fusing mRFP to 301B/1 pUL47 can be an effective tool to track 301B/1 in chickens.
v301B47R can spread from chicken to chicken
Over the course of 9 weeks, 50% of the naïve contact chickens housed with experimentally infected chickens became positive by the time the experiment was terminated (Fig. 2E). There was a delay of about three weeks before naïve contact chickens began to show fluorescent feathers compared to experimentally infected chickens, which is consistent with the time it takes for MDV to interindividual spread. These results confirm that 301B/1 can interindividual spread from chicken to chicken.
Generation of r301B/1 lacking gC or expressing 3 × Flag301B gC or MDV gC
Now that we had a tool to track 301B/1 in cell culture and chickens, we wanted to test two hypotheses. First, we hypothesized that 301B/1 gC, like MDV gC, would be required for interindividual spread in chickens. Second, we hypothesized that, since both GaHV-3 and MDV are chicken herpesviruses with similar pathogeneses, MDV gC would compensate for 301B/1 replication and transmission. Therefore, we removed the complete UL44 (gC) open reading frame (ORF) from r301B47R to generate r3ΔgC (Fig. 1A). To generate a rescuent virus, 301B/1 gC was inserted back into the viral genome where it was originally removed but included a 3 × Flag tag at the N-terminus (r3-ΔgC-R) that should allow us to identify 301B/1 gC in downstream studies. In addition, we inserted MDV gC in its place to generate r3-MDVgC. RFLP analysis confirmed the integrity of the BAC clones as the predicted banding pattern was observed (Fig. 1C, D). In addition, DNA sequencing confirmed that each clone was correct at the nucleotide level (data not shown) using primers specific for each gene (Table 1).
Replication of v301B/1 lacking gC (v3ΔgC) or expressing MDV gC (v3-MDVgC) in cell culture
Following reconstitution of r301B/1 clones with UL44 removed (v3ΔgC) and replaced with Flag-tagged 301B/1 gC (r3ΔgC-R) or MDV gC (r3-MDVgC), we tested replication in CEC cultures using plaque size assays (Fig. 3A). Removal of 301B/1 gC resulted in significantly large plaque sizes, which is consistent with what is observed for MDV17,18. Adding 3 × Flag301B gC restored smaller plaque sizes (v3ΔgC-R), while adding MDV gC also restored smaller plaque sizes that were significantly different to v3ΔgC. However, virus growth kinetics measuring viral DNA replication in qPCR assays showed no significant differences (Fig. 3B). Figure 3C shows western blotting of total protein and media from infected cells using anti-MDV gC and -Flag antibodies. The rescued 301B/1 gC could be detected using the anti-Flag antibody in both cellular protein extracts and infected cell media, suggesting 301B/1 gC is also secreted as has been previously shown for MDV gC17,33. We also confirmed MDV gC expression in both infected cells and was in the media of infected cells. Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) were used to examine expression in cells and showed that Flag-tagged 301B/1 gC (Fig. 3D) and MDV gC proteins (Fig. 3E) were detected as expected. These results show that adding the 3 × Flag epitope to the N-terminus 301B/1 gC did not affect 301B/1 replication in cell culture and allowed us to identify its expression in vitro. Also, 301B/1 expressing MDV gC did not affect replication based on plaque size assays and MDV gC was expressed in v3-MDVgC.
301B/1 gC is required for interindividual spread
To test our hypotheses that GaHV-3 gC, like MDV gC, would be required for interindividual spread in chickens, we tested our newly derived v3ΔgC using our experimental and natural infection model for interindividual spread. To do this, 8–10 chickens were inoculated with 10,000 PFU of each virus and housed with 6–10 uninfected chickens over the course of 8 weeks. Using qPCR assays to measure 301B/1 replication in the blood of experimentally infected chickens (Fig. 4A) and presence in FFs (Fig. 4B), no differences were seen between v301B47R, v3ΔgC, and v3ΔgC-R. However, when contact chickens were monitored for natural infection, no chickens housed with v3ΔgC-infected birds became infected compared to 88% and 60% of contact chickens were infected with v301B47R and v3ΔgC-R, respectively (Fig. 4B). Following termination, whole blood was collected from all contact chicken, serum was tested for anti-GaHV-3 antibodies using IFA and blood was used to measure 301B/1 viral DNA. It was confirmed all chickens negative for fluorescent FFs were also negative for anti-GaHV-3 antibodies and 301B/1 viral DNA in the blood (data not shown). IFA (Fig. 4C) and western blotting (Fig. 4E) were used to confirm the 3 × Flag epitope remained fused to the 301B/1 gC protein. With these results, we can conclude that 301B/1 gC is required for interindividual spread of the 301B/1 MD vaccine strain and the addition of a 3 × Flag epitope at the N-terminus of 301B/1 gC does not affect its function during interindividual spread.
MDV gC can compensate for 301B/1 gC during 301B/1 interindividual spread
To test our second hypothesis that MDV gC would compensate for 301B/1 replication and transmission, we also tested v3-MDVgC in vivo. There was no difference in virus replication in the blood using qPCR assays (Fig. 4A) nor the ability to reach the FFs (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, v3-MDVgC was able to naturally infect chickens similar to v301B47R and v3ΔgC-R showing that MDV gC can compensate for 301B/1 in this essential function in vivo. IFA (Fig. 4D) and western blotting (Fig. 4E) were used to confirm MDV gC expression was maintained during replication in FFE cells. These results show that MDV gC can compensate for 301B/1 gC during 301B/1 MD vaccine strain interindividual spread in chickens.
Discussion
In this report, we tested the importance of the alphaherpesvirus conserved gC protein for interindividual spread of the MD vaccine strain 301B/1. In addition, we tested whether MDV gC could compensate for 301B/1 gC in transmission and whether N-terminal tagging of 301B/1 gC would affect its function during interindividual spread. We were able to confidently conclude that 301B/1 gC is required for interindividual spread of 301B/1 virus and the addition of a 3 × Flag epitope at the N-terminus did not affect its function during transmission. We were also able to conclude that MDV gC can compensate 301B/1 gC during interindividual spread of 301B/1 virus. This data, combined with our former work on MDV15,16, suggests the essential role for the alphaherpesvirus conserved gC during interindividual spread is a conserved function of avian herpesviruses.
The exact role of MDV and 301B/1 gC during interindividual spread is not completely understood, but the absolute requirement during natural infection suggests it may be involved in virus-cell binding to cells. Homologs of gC perform multiple functions in vitro that include primary attachment of cell-free virus to proteoglycans on the surface of cells2,3,34,35 but is not required for specific interactions on cells where glycoprotein (gD) normally performs this function36,37. For HSV-1, gD binds to the herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, nectin-2, or modified heparin sulfate on the surface of cells providing a mechanism for cell tropic binding38 and it is believed gD of other members of the Alphaherpesvirinae perform similar functions. However, formerly we have shown that gD is not required for MDV interindividual spread15. The absolute requirement for MDV, and now 301B/1, gC in this process suggests it plays a more direct role in binding to cells during MDV and 301B/1 natural infection. Based on the ability of 301B/1 to naturally infect chickens when expressing 301B/1 or MDV gC and the close sequence homology (72.655% protein identity) between the two proteins (Fig. 1E), both proteins may target the same cellular protein and cell type to initiate infection. We are currently performing studies to elucidate potential binding partners for gC.
Currently, most MD vaccines do not transmit efficiently in chickens and thus cannot compete with virulent virus that does spread efficiently. Read et al.39 showed that current MD vaccines can enhance transmission of virulent MDV in the field, possibly because they are unable to block infection of chickens and shedding of virus. The fact that 301B/1 is as effective as traditional vaccine strains23 and is able to efficiently transmit in chickens suggests this vaccine strain may better protect unvaccinated or “missed” chickens in a flock and potentially compete with virulent MDV for replication in the skin. On top of that, swapping MDV gC for 301B/1 will most likely provide better immunogenic responses to MDV as gC is a major antigenic target against MDV40 and could increase its protective index.
Another important result in this report was that both 301B/1 and MDV gC proteins were secreted into the infected culture cell media suggesting alternative splicing of 301B/1 and MDV gC occurs in 301B/1 as has been shown for MDV gC during MDV cell culture propagation17. Further analysis on the splicing of the gC mRNA during 301B/1 replication is warranted; however, this data suggests the splicing of gC transcripts is also conserved in 301B/1 and the mechanism of gC transcript splicing, such as ICP27 and pUL4732,41, may also be conserved among the avian herpesviruses.
In summary, our results support our hypothesis that the absolute requirement of gC during interindividual spread is conserved among alphaherpesviruses. This report extends our work on MDV gC requirement to the MD vaccine strain 301B/1, and we can conclude at least for some avian herpesviruses with similar pathogeneses, that the functional importance of gC during interindividual spread is conserved. Further studies are warranted to determine whether gC homologs of other alphaherpesvirus are required for natural infection, although there are limited natural animal models to perform such studies making the avian herpesvirus models important for understanding conserved herpesvirus genes during natural infections.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and cells
All cells were maintained at 38 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Chicken embryo cells (CEC) were prepared from 10 to 11-day-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) embryos obtained from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Poultry Farm following standard methods42. Briefly, primary CEC cultures were seeded in growth medium consisting of Medium 199 (Cellgro, Corning, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% tryptose-phosphate broth (TPB), 0.63% NaHCO3 solution, antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin), and 4% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Confluent CEC cultures were maintained in Medium 199 supplemented with 7.5% TPB, 0.63% NaHCO3, 0.2% FBS, and antibiotics.
The chicken DF-1-Cre fibroblast cell line43 was cultivated in a 1:1 mixture of Leibovitz L-15 and McCoy 5A (LM) media (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin), and maintained in 50 µg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Generation of two-step red recombination shuttle vectors
To produce pEP-301BgC-in, 301B/1 UL44 was Gibson assembly cloned from r301B/1 BAC DNA into pcDNA3.1 using primers shown in Table 2. Briefly, 301B/1 UL44 was amplified by PCR using a set of primers encompassing the complete UL44 gene, gel purified, and cloned into the pcDNA3.1 TOPO vector (Life Technologies) using Gibson Assembly reaction mix (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to generate pc301BgC. Next, a 3 × Flag epitope was cloned into pc301BgC from a previously described r3 × Flag54 BAC clone32 using Gibson assembly to generate pc3 × Flag301BgC. Next, the aphAI-I-SceI cassette was amplified from pEP-KanS2 using primers shown in Table 2 and inserted into pc3 × Flag301BgC using Gibson Assembly cloning to generate pEP-301BgC-in. All clones at each step were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. For insertion of MDV gC (RB1B strain) into r301B/1, a previously described pEP-MDVgC-in shuttle vector was used17.
Table 2.
Constructa | Directionb | Sequence (5′ → 3′) |
---|---|---|
pc301B gC | Vector For | ACATATTACTTTCGTCCGTCGGTAAGCCTATCCCTAACCCTCTCC |
Vector Rev | GACGCGTGCATGGGGAAAATTCCGAGCTCGGTACCAAGCTTAACTAG | |
Insert For | AGCTTGGTACCGAGCTCGGAATTTTCCCCATGCACGCGTCACG | |
Insert Rev | GGGTTAGGGATAGGCTTACCGACGGACGAAAGTAATATGTATTTTTTCCCGG | |
pc3 × Flag301B gC | Vector For | ACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGATTAACCCCGATCTAGCTACACCC |
Vector Rev | CCGTCATGATCCTTGTAATCGCTAGCGCTTAGGACGCG | |
Insert For | GCCGCGTCCTAAGCGCTAGCGATTACAAGGATCATGACGGAGATTACAAGG | |
Insert Rev | GTAGCTAGATCGGGGTTAATCTTATCGTCGTCATCCTTGTAATCGATGT | |
pEP-301BgC-in | Vector For | GGCATAGAAATATCATCAGCCGAATATTACTCC |
Vector Rev | CGATTACCCTGTTATCCCTAGCTGATGATATTTCTATGCCGCTTGAG | |
Insert 1 For | GGCATAGAAATATCATCAGCTAGGGATAACAGGGTAATCGATTTATTCAACAAAG | |
Insert 1 Rev | CCTGCAAAGACCTGTAACCAGCCAGTGTTACAACCAATTAACCAAT | |
Insert 2 For | TAATTGGTTGTAACACTGGCTGGTTACAGGTCTTTGCAGGACCC | |
Insert 2 Rev | TCATCTTGGAGTAATATTCGGCTGATGATATT |
aConstruct generated with the set of primers.
bDirectionality of the primer and product produced for Gibson assembly cloning.
Generation of r301B/1 clones
To create 301B/1 expressing fluorescent-tagged pUL47, the coding sequence of the monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP) gene was inserted in frame at the C-terminus of the 301B/1 UL47 ORF by two-step Red-mediated mutagenesis44 in an infectious BAC clone of 301B/1. Briefly, the mRFP-I-SceI-aphAI cassette was amplified from pEP-mRFP-in45 using primers shown in Table 3 and used for mutagenesis in GS1783 Escherichia coli cells. Multiple integrates and resolved clones were screened by RFLP analysis, analytic PCR, and DNA sequencing using primers shown in Table 1.
Table 3.
Modificationa | Directionb | Sequence (5′- 3′)c |
---|---|---|
UL47mRFP | Forward | AGAAGATGCGAAGGAGGCGATCTTCAAAAAAACGGACCGGATGGCCTCCTCCGAGGACG |
Reverse | TCACCACGATCTGCACGCCGCTCCGTGCGCTTTTTTTTTACAAGGCGCCGGTGGAGTG | |
ΔgC | Forward | ATATACGCTCTCGGAGACGCGGCTCGCACGCCAGCTGAAATATTTTCCCCTAGTTTGCGGTGACATTGATTAGGGATAACAGGGTAATCGATTT |
Reverse | TACAAGAGCTCGGGGCATATAATGAGCCAGATCAATGTCACCGCAAACTAGGGGAAAATATTTCAGCTGGGCCAGTGTTACAACCAATTAACC | |
ΔgC-R (3 × Flag301BgC) | Forward | GGCTCGCACGCCAGCTGAAATATTTTCCCCCCCATGCACGCGTCACG |
Reverse | AATGAGCCAGATCAATGTCACCGCAAACTAGACGGACGAAAGTAATATGTATTTTTTCCCG | |
MDV gC | Forward | ATATACGCTCTCGGAGACGCGGCTCGCACGTATCTTCCCTCATGCTCACG |
Reverse | TACAAGAGCTCGGGGCATATAATGAGCCAGCATAACAATGAGATTATAAT |
aModification to the 301B/1 genome using two-step Red-mediated recombination.
bDirectionality of the primer.
cUnderlined sequence indicates start and stop codons for 301B/1 UL44 gene. Italics indicate the template-binding region of the primers for PCR amplification with pEP-mRFP-in, pEP-KanS2, pEP-301BgC-in, or pEP-MDVgC-in. Bold indicates unique upstream integration sequences. Bold italic indicates unique downstream integration sequences.
To create r3ΔgC, the coding sequence of 301B/1 UL44 (gC) was deleted from r301B47R. Briefly, the I-SceI-aphAI cassette from pEP-KanS2 was amplified by PCR with Thermo Scientific Phusion Flash High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix using primers shown in Table 3 and used for mutagenesis in GS1783 E. coli cells. Following removal of UL44 in the r301B47R clone, 301B/1 gC with a 3 × Flag epitope inserted at the N-terminus after the predicted signal sequence, or MDV gC were inserted into r3ΔgC using two-step Red recombination. Briefly, 3 × Flag301B/1 gC or MDV gC were PCR amplified from pEP-301BgC-in or pEP-MDVgC-in, respectively, using primers shown in Table 3 and used for mutagenesis as described above. RFLP analysis, analytical PCR, and DNA sequencing confirmed all clones were correct. Primers used for MDV gC have been previously published17,46,47, while primers for sequencing 301B/1 gC are listed in Table 1.
r301B/1 s were reconstituted by transfecting DF-1-Cre cells with purified BAC DNA plus Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) using the manufacturers’ instructions as previously described29. Transfected DF-1-Cre cells were mixed with fresh primary CEC cultures until plaques formed, then further propagated in CEC cultures until virus stocks could be stored. All viruses were used at ≤ 5 passages for in vitro and in vivo studies.
Immunofluorescence assays (IFA)
CEC cultures were infected with different r301B/1 viruses on sterile glass coverslips at 100 plaque-forming units (PFU) per well. At 5 days post-infection (p.i.), cells were fixed with PFA buffer (2% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% Triton X-100) for 15 min and then washed twice with PBS. Fixed coverslips were blocked in 10% neonatal calf serum and stained with anti-GaHV-3 chicken sera and goat anti-chicken IgY-Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). To detect 3 × Flag301BgC, mouse anti-Flag M2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. Anti-gC monoclonal A6 (kindly provided by Jean-Francois Vautherot, INRA, Nouzilly, France) antibody48 was used to detected MDV gC expression. Anti-mouse Ig Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used as secondary antibody for both anti-Flag and -MDV gC monoclonal antibodies. The virus plaques were observed using an EVOS FL Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and compiled using Adobe Photoshop version 21.0.1.
Measurement of plaque areas
Plaque areas were measured in CEC cultures exactly as previously described49 using anti-GaHV-3 chicken sera and goat anti-chicken IgY-Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Digital images of 50 individual plaques were collected using an EVOS FL Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and compiled with Adobe Photoshop version 21.0.1. Plaque areas were measured using ImageJ50 version 1.53d software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij). Box and Whisker plots were generated, and significant differences were determined using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27 software.
Viral growth kinetics in cell culture
To measure viral growth kinetics of viruses in cell culture, qPCR assays were used to measure the relative level of replication as previously described23. Briefly, CEC cultures were prepared in 6-well tissue culture plates and the next day inoculated with 100 PFU/well. Total DNA was collected from the inoculum and at 48, 72, 96, and 120 h following infection using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Quantification of 301B/1 genomic copies in CEC cultures was performed using primers and probe previously described23 and were used in duplex PCR reactions with previously described primers and probes against chicken iNOS51. All qPCR assays were performed in an Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the results were analyzed using the QuantStudio Design & Analysis Software v1.4.2 supplied by the manufacturer. The fold-increase in viral DNA copies over inoculum was used to determine differences in replication.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analyses were performed as previously described48. Total protein was collected from infected CEC cultures or scraped from FFE previously described18. In some experiments, infected CEC culture media was collected to detected secreted proteins. To detect the relative level of 301B/1 infection, mouse anti-GaHV-3 Y5.952 was used at 1:500 dilution to detect GaHV-3 specific gB. To detect mRFP tagged 301B/1 pUL47, rabbit anti-mRFP antibody (ab62341; Abcam) was used with secondary sheep anti-rabbit IgG (H + L)-HRP conjugate (A16172; Life Technologies, Inc.). To detect MDV gC, monoclonal antibody A6 was used at a 1:500 dilution. To detect 3 × Flag tagged 301B/1 gC, anti-Flag M2 was used and for protein loading control, mouse anti-β-actin (ACTNO5; Abcam, Cambridge, MA) was used at their recommended dilutions. Anti-bovine serum albumin (BSA, Thermo Fisher Scientific) mAb was used at its recommended dilution as a loading control for infected cell media. Secondary anti-mouse IgG peroxidase conjugate was purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ) and used for mouse monoclonal antibodies. The SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate kit from Thermo Fischer Scientific (Rockford, IL) was used to detect antigens using the manufacturer’s instructions.
Ethics statement
All animal work was conducted according to national regulations and ARRIVE guidelines. The animal care facilities and programs of UIUC meet the requirements of the law (89 –544, 91–579, 94 –276) and NIH regulations on laboratory animals and are compliant with the Animal Welfare Act, PL 279. UIUC and the College of Veterinary Medicine at UIUC are accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). All experimental procedures were conducted in compliance with approval of UIUC’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Animal experiments
Pure Columbian (PC) chickens were obtained from the UIUC Poultry Farm (Urbana, IL) and were from MD-vaccinated parents; therefore, considered to be maternal antibody positive. To test replication of v301B47R, 7-day old chicks (n = 10) were experimentally infected by intra-abdominal inoculation of 4000 PFU for v301B47R and housed with another ten chickens that were left uninfected to act as contacts to determine whether v301B47R can naturally infect naïve chickens by interindividual spread. To test the ability of v301B47R, v3ΔgC, v3ΔgC-R, v3-MDVgC to replicate and interindividual spread in chickens, 3-day old PC chicks (n = 8–10/group) were inoculated with 10,000 PFU with each respective virus and housed in separate rooms. To test natural infection through interindividual spread, 6–8 age-match, naïve contact chickens were housed experimentally infected chickens for eight weeks. Water and food were provided ad libitum for all animal experiments.
DNA extraction from blood cells and qPCR assays
Whole blood was obtained by wing-vein puncture and DNA was extracted using the E.Z. 96 blood DNA kit from Omega Bio-tek, Inc. (Norcross, GA) as previously described15. Quantification of 301B/1 genomic copies in the blood using qPCR was performed using primers and probe previously described23 and were used in duplex PCR reactions with previously described primers and probes against chicken iNOS51. All qPCR assays were performed in an Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the results were analyzed using the QuantStudio Design & Analysis Software v1.4.2 supplied by the manufacturer. The final viral loads were obtained after normalizing with chicken iNOS used as an internal control gene.
Monitoring v301B47R and its derivatives in feather follicles (FFs)
To track the time at which each r301B47R or its derivatives reached the FFs, two flight feathers were plucked from the right and left wings (4 total) of inoculated birds weekly and pUL47mRFP expression was examined using a Leica M205 FCA fluorescent stereomicroscope with a Leica DFC7000T digital color microscope camera (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL).
IFA of feather follicles (FFs)
Whole feathers were plucked from chickens infected with different r301B/1s and the FFs were fixed using PFA buffer, washed twice with PBS, and then blocked in 10% neonatal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich). Fixed FFs were stained with primary mouse anti-Flag M2 (Sigma-Aldrich) or anti-MDV gC A648 antibodies with anti-mouse Ig Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) used as secondary antibody. The Leica M205 FCA fluorescent stereomicroscope with a Leica DFC7000T digital color microscope camera (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) was used to analyze stained FFEs. All images were compiled using Adobe Photoshop version 21.0.1.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27 software (SPSS Inc., USA). Plaque size assays were analyzed with Student’s t tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), virus was included as fixed effect and the plaque size was used as dependent variable. The normalized data of viral replication (qPCR) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by LSD and Tukey’s post hoc tests; virus (V) and time (T) and all possible interactions (V × T) were used as fixed effects, and the genomic copies as dependent variable. Fisher’s exact test was used for infection and transmission experiments. Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05 and the mean tests experiments associated with significant interaction (p < 0.05) were separated with Tukey’s test.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Drs. Yung-Tien (Yvette) Tien for help in performing necropsy examinations during the bird experiments. This report was partially supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant Nos. 2010-65119-19996 and 2019-67015-29262 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture for K.W.J. This work was also supported by US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) project number 6040-32000-074-00D to T.K.
Author contributions
W.V. and H.X. are both considered first authors. K.W.J. conceived and designed the experiments. W.V., H.X., and N.P. conducted the experiments. W.V., H.X., H.A., and K.W.J. analyzed the results. T.K. and K.W.J. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. K.W.J. attained the funding. W.V., T.K., and K.W.J. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Widaliz Vega-Rodriguez and Huai Xu.
References
- 1.Lefkowitz EJ, et al. Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) Nucl. Acids Res. 2018;46:D708–D717. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mettenleiter TC. Glycoprotein gIII deletion mutants of pseudorabies virus are impaired in virus entry. Virology. 1989;171:623–625. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90635-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rue CA, Ryan P. Characterization of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein C attachment to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J. Gen. Virol. 2002;83:301–309. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-83-2-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Osterrieder N. Construction and characterization of an equine herpesvirus 1 glycoprotein C negative mutant. Virus Res. 1999;59:165–177. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(98)00134-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Langeland N, et al. Localization on the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome of a region encoding proteins involved in adsorption to the cellular receptor. J. Virol. 1990;64:1271–1277. doi: 10.1128/JVI.64.3.1271-1277.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Komala Sari T, Gianopulos KA, Nicola AV. Glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus 1 shields glycoprotein B from antibody neutralization. J. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01852-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allen GP, Coogle LD. Characterization of an equine herpesvirus type 1 gene encoding a glycoprotein (gp13) with homology to herpes simplex virus glycoprotein C. J. Virol. 1988;62:2850–2858. doi: 10.1128/JVI.62.8.2850-2858.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eisenberg RJ, et al. Complement component C3b binds directly to purified glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. Microb. Pathog. 1987;3:423–435. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(87)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Friedman HM, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Seidel CA, Cines DB. Glycoprotein C of herpes simplex virus 1 acts as a receptor for the C3b complement component on infected cells. Nature. 1984;309:633–635. doi: 10.1038/309633a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huemer HP, Larcher C, Coe NE. Pseudorabies virus glycoprotein III derived from virions and infected cells binds to the third component of complement. Virus Res. 1992;23:271–280. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(92)90113-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huemer HP, Larcher C, van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S, Babiuk LA. Species selective interaction of Alphaherpesvirinae with the “unspecific” immune system of the host. Arch. Virol. 1993;130:353–364. doi: 10.1007/BF01309666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huemer HP, Nowotny N, Crabb BS, Meyer H, Hubert PH. gp13 (EHV-gC): a complement receptor induced by equine herpesviruses. Virus Res. 1995;37:113–126. doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(95)00027-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gonzalez-Motos V, et al. Varicella zoster virus glycoprotein C increases chemokine-mediated leukocyte migration. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006346. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moffat JF, et al. Attenuation of the vaccine Oka strain of varicella-zoster virus and role of glycoprotein C in alphaherpesvirus virulence demonstrated in the SCID-hu mouse. J. Virol. 1998;72:965–974. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.2.965-974.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jarosinski KW, et al. Horizontal transmission of Marek's disease virus requires US2, the UL13 protein kinase, and gC. J. Virol. 2007;81:10575–10587. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01065-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jarosinski KW, Osterrieder N. Further analysis of Marek's disease virus horizontal transmission confirms that U(L)44 (gC) and U(L)13 protein kinase activity are essential, while U(S)2 is nonessential. J. Virol. 2010;84:7911–7916. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00433-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jarosinski KW, Osterrieder N. Marek's disease virus expresses multiple UL44 (gC) variants through mRNA splicing that are all required for efficient horizontal transmission. J. Virol. 2012;86:7896–7906. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00908-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vega-Rodriguez W, Ponnuraj N, Jarosinski KW. Marek's disease alphaherpesvirus (MDV) RLORF4 is not required for expression of glycoprotein C and interindividual spread. Virology. 2019;534:108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Osterrieder N, Kamil JP, Schumacher D, Tischer BK, Trapp S. Marek's disease virus: from miasma to model. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:283–294. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morrow, C. & Fehler, F. Marek's disease: a worldwide problem. In Marek's Disease: An Evolving Problem (eds Davison, F. & Nair, V.) 49–61 (Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, UK, 2004).
- 21.Baaten BJ, et al. Early replication in pulmonary B cells after infection with Marek's disease herpesvirus by the respiratory route. Viral Immunol. 2009;22:431–444. doi: 10.1089/vim.2009.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Witter RL. The changing landscape of Marek's disease. Avian Pathol. 1998;27:S46–S53. doi: 10.1080/03079459808419292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim T, Spatz SJ, Dunn JR. Vaccinal efficacy of molecularly cloned Gallid alphaherpesvirus 3 strain 301B/1 against very virulent Marek's disease virus challenge. J. Gen. Virol. 2020;101:542–552. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jarosinski KW. Dual infection and superinfection inhibition of epithelial skin cells by two alphaherpesviruses co-occur in the natural host. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jarosinski KW, Arndt S, Kaufer BB, Osterrieder N. Fluorescently tagged pUL47 of Marek's disease virus reveals differential tissue expression of the tegument protein in vivo. J. Virol. 2012;86:2428–2436. doi: 10.1128/jvi.06719-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jarosinski KW, et al. Cellular stress response to varicella-zoster virus infection of human skin includes highly elevated interleukin-6 expression. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018;5:ofy118. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Donnelly M, Elliott G. Fluorescent tagging of herpes simplex virus tegument protein VP13/14 in virus infection. J. Virol. 2001;75:2575–2583. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.2575-2583.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Verhagen J, Hutchinson I, Elliott G. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of bovine herpesvirus 1 UL47 protein in infected cells. J. Virol. 2006;80:1059–1063. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.1059-1063.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jarosinski KW, Vautherot JF. Differential expression of Marek's disease virus (MDV) late proteins during in vitro and in situ replication: role for pUL47 in regulation of the MDV UL46-UL49 gene locus. Virology. 2015;484:213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jarosinski KW. Marek's disease virus late protein expression in feather follicle epithelial cells as early as 8 days postinfection. Avian Dis. 2012;56:725–731. doi: 10.1637/10252-052212-reg.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee LF, Liu X, Witter RL. Monoclonal antibodies with specificity for three different serotypes of Marek's disease viruses in chickens. J. Immunol. 1983;130:1003–1006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ponnuraj N, Tien YT, Vega-Rodriguez W, Krieter A, Jarosinski KW. The Herpesviridae conserved multifunctional infected-cell protein 27 (ICP27) is important but not required for replication and oncogenicity of Marek's disease alphaherpesvirus. J. Virol. 2019;93:e01903–01918. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01903-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Isfort RJ, Stringer RA, Kung HJ, Velicer LF. Synthesis, processing, and secretion of the Marek's disease herpesvirus A antigen glycoprotein. J. Virol. 1986;57:464–474. doi: 10.1128/JVI.57.2.464-474.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Banfield BW, et al. Evidence for an interaction of herpes simplex virus with chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans during infection. Virology. 1995;208:531–539. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spear PG, Longnecker R. Herpesvirus entry: an update. J. Virol. 2003;77:10179–10185. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.19.10179-10185.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krummenacher C, et al. Structure of unliganded HSV gD reveals a mechanism for receptor-mediated activation of virus entry. EMBO J. 2005;24:4144–4153. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cocchi F, et al. The soluble ectodomain of herpes simplex virus gD contains a membrane-proximal pro-fusion domain and suffices to mediate virus entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:7445–7450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401883101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spear PG, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH. Three classes of cell surface receptors for alphaherpesvirus entry. Virology. 2000;275:1–8. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Read AF, et al. Imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Van Zaane D, Brinkhof JM, Westenbrink F, Gielkens AL. Molecular-biological characterization of Marek's disease virus. I. Identification of virus-specific polypeptides in infected cells. Virology. 1982;121:116–132. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chuard A, et al. The tegument protein pUL47 of Marek's disease virus is necessary for horizontal transmission and is important for expression of glycoprotein gC. J. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01645-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schat, K. A. & Sellers, H. S. Cell-culture methods. In A laboratory Manual for the Identification and Characterization of Avian Pathogens (eds. Dufour-Zavala, L. et al.) 195–203 (American Association of Avian Pathologists, Jacksonville, FL, 2008).
- 43.Niikura M, Kim T, Silva RF, Dodgson J, Cheng HH. Virulent Marek's disease virus generated from infectious bacterial artificial chromosome clones with complete DNA sequence and the implication of viral genetic homogeneity in pathogenesis. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92:598–607. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.026864-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tischer BK, Smith GA, Osterrieder N. En passant mutagenesis: a two step markerless red recombination system. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;634:421–430. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-652-8_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tischer BK, von Einem J, Kaufer B, Osterrieder N. Two-step red-mediated recombination for versatile high-efficiency markerless DNA manipulation in Escherichia coli. Biotechniques. 2006;40:191–197. doi: 10.2144/000112096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jarosinski KW, O'Connell PH, Schat KA. Impact of deletions within the Bam HI-L fragment of attenuated Marek's disease virus on vIL-8 expression and the newly identified transcript of open reading frame LORF4. Virus Genes. 2003;26:255–269. doi: 10.1023/a:1024447230464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jarosinski KW, Schat KA. Multiple alternative splicing to exons II and III of viral interleukin-8 (vIL-8) in the Marek's disease virus genome: the importance of vIL-8 exon I. Virus Genes. 2007;34:9–22. doi: 10.1007/s11262-006-0004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tischer BK, et al. High-level expression of Marek's disease virus glycoprotein C is detrimental to virus growth in vitro. J. Virol. 2005;79:5889–5899. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.10.5889-5899.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jarosinski KW, Osterrieder N, Nair VK, Schat KA. Attenuation of Marek's disease virus by deletion of open reading frame RLORF4 but not RLORF5a. J. Virol. 2005;79:11647–11659. doi: 10.1128/jvi.79.18.11647-11659.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 2004;11:36–42. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jarosinski KW, Yunis R, O'Connell PH, Markowski-Grimsrud CJ, Schat KA. Influence of genetic resistance of the chicken and virulence of Marek's disease virus (MDV) on nitric oxide responses after MDV infection. Avian Dis. 2002;46:636–649. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0636:iogrot]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ikuta K, Ueda S, Kato S, Hirai K. Monoclonal antibodies reactive with the surface and secreted glycoproteins of Marek's disease virus and herpesvirus of turkeys. J. Gen. Virol. 1983;64(Pt 12):2597–2610. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-64-12-2597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]