Abstract
Objective
To determine the seroprevalence of Leptospira immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibodies and its association with the characteristics of the study population from the northern Mexican city of Durango, Mexico.
Methods
Through a cross-sectional study design, inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico were surveyed between June 2018 and November 2018. Serum samples from the subjects were analysed for anti-Leptospira IgG and IgM antibodies using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural and housing characteristics were recorded. Data were analysed by bivariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
The study enrolled 413 people, of which 124 (30.0%) and 137 (33.2%) were positive for anti-Leptospira IgG antibodies and anti-Leptospira IgM antibodies, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that Leptospira seropositivity was associated with professional occupation, alcohol consumption, ill clinical status, memory impairment and a history of surgery.
Conclusions
This is the first study to report the seroepidemiology of Leptospira infection in an urban general population in the north of Mexico. The seroprevalence of Leptospira infection found was higher than those previously reported in Mexican studies.
Keywords: Leptospira, epidemiology, seroprevalence, urban, Mexico
Introduction
Leptospirosis is the disease caused by the pathogenic bacteria of the genus Leptospira.1 Leptospirosis has the highest burden in low-income populations both in urban and in rural environments.2 Typical reservoirs of Leptospira are mice and rats, whereas humans are accidental hosts of pathogenic Leptospira.3 Human infections can vary from asymptomatic to severe disease with life-threatening consequences.4 Some Leptospira-infected individuals develop a disease comprising jaundice and renal failure.5 In its severe form, leptospirosis can cause multiorgan dysfunction and death in a matter of days.6 Despite efforts for the development of an effective vaccine against leptospirosis, few advances have been made.7
Knowledge about the seroepidemiology of Leptospira infection in Mexico is limited. In a study of inhabitants of the southern Mexican state of Veracruz, researchers found a 4% seroprevalence of Leptospira infection.8 Whereas in a study of the general population in rural communities in the northern Mexican state of Durango, a 15.6% seroprevalence of Leptospira infection was found.9 This current study determined the seroprevalence of anti-Leptospira immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibodies and its association with the sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural and housing characteristics of the study population from the northern Mexican city of Durango, Mexico.
Materials and methods
Study design and population
This cross-sectional study surveyed inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico between June 2018 and November 2018. This study was undertaken by Juárez University of Durango State, Durango, Mexico. Inclusion criteria for enrolment were as follows: (i) inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico; (ii) aged ≥ 14 years; (iii) those that voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. Subjects were recruited in factories, educational and health facilities, businesses and a government agency.
The Ethics Committee of the Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Durango, Mexico approved this Project. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was taken from each participant.
Sociodemographic, clinical, housing and behavioural characteristics
Birthplace (Durango or other Mexican state), residence (Durango or other Mexican state), age, sex, education (1–6, 7–12, > 12 years), socioeconomic status (low, medium, high) and occupation (housewife, business, construction, employees, student, factory worker, professional, none or other) of participants was recorded. Clinical data included health status (ill or healthy), history of blood transfusions, transplants, surgeries, hepatitis, lymph node enlargement, frequent headache or abdominal pain, and impairments of vision, hearing, memory and reflexes. Housing conditions include information about crowding, form of elimination of excretes, type of floors, availability of drinkable water and education of the head of the family. Behavioural characteristics included consumption of untreated water, unwashed raw fruits or vegetables, contact with soil, consumption of unpasteurized milk, type of meat consumed, raising animals and traveling.
Detection of anti-Leptospira IgG and IgM antibodies and Leptospira DNA
Phlebotomy was performed at the antecubital fossa. Venous blood (5 ml) was collected from each participant. Blood samples were left at room temperature for 1–4 h to allow clot formation and then centrifuged at 2500 g for 10 min at room temperature using a Thermo Scientific™ Sorvall™ Legend™ X1R Centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Serum samples were obtained and stored at –20 °C until tested. Sera were analysed for anti-Leptospira IgG and IgM antibodies using the commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) AccuDiag™ Leptospira IgG ELISA Kit (Diagnostic Automation/Cortez Diagnostics Inc., Woodland Hills, CA, USA) and AccuDiag™ Leptospira IgM ELISA Kit (Diagnostic Automation/Cortez Diagnostics Inc.), respectively.
Detection of Leptospira DNA was performed by end-point multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following the protocol previously described.10 DNA was extracted from 0.5 ml of whole blood as previously described.11 PCR was performed using a C1000 Touch™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California. USA). The primer sequences were as follows: LG1, 5ʹ-CGGTGAAATGCGTAGATATC-3ʹ; LG2, 5ʹ-CGGTTTGTCACCGGCAGTTC-3ʹ; LP1, 5ʹ-TCGTTTTAGAATCGATAG-3ʹ; LP2, 5ʹ-ATACTTCCATTATGTA-3ʹ. In addition, β-globin was detected using the following primers: Dir1, 5ʹ-ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC-3′; and Rev1, 5′-CAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC-3ʹ. The reaction mix consisted of 1× PCR buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 200 µM of dNTP (Promega), 60 pmol of each primer (LG1, LG2, LP1, LP2, Dir1 and Rev1; Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA), 1U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) and 5 µl of genomic DNA (5 ng/µl). The cycling programme involved preliminary denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 58 °C for 1 min, and elongation at 72 °C for 2 min, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified products were analysed by electrophoresis using 3% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide followed by visualization with UV light. For the LG1/LG2 primers, the expected amplicon sizes ranged from 479 to 483 base pairs. For the LP1/LP2 primers, the expected amplicon sizes ranged from 192 to 282 base pairs. For the Dir1/Rev1 primers, the expected amplicon size was of 113 base pairs.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info™ for Windows version 7 (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A sample size of 316 people was required, which was calculated using a 95% confidence level, a reference seroprevalence of 15.6%,9 a population size of 500 000 and 4% of confidence limits. Pearson’s χ2-test was used to compare seroprevalences among the groups. As a strategy to find variables associated with infection, only variables with a P-value ≤ 0.05 obtained in the bivariate analysis were further analysed by logistic regression analysis with the Enter method. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Statistical significance was set at a P-value < 0.05.
Results
This cross-sectional study surveyed 413 inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico. Of the 413 people studied, 124 (30.0%) and 137 (33.2%) were positive for anti-Leptospira IgG antibodies and anti-Leptospira IgM antibodies, respectively. The age in participants ranged from 14 to 78 years (mean ± SD: 35.38 ± 13.23 years). None of the participants was positive for Leptospira DNA by PCR. Of the sociodemographic characteristics studied, only the variable occupation had a P-value ≤ 0.05 by bivariate analysis. With respect to behavioural and housing characteristics, bivariate analysis showed that only the variables national trips, consumption of untreated water and alcohol consumption were associated (P < 0.05) with seropositivity to Leptospira (Table 1). With regard to clinical characteristics, bivariate analysis showed that Leptospira IgG seropositivity was associated (P < 0.05) only with an ill clinical status, memory impairment and a history of surgery. Multivariate analysis of sociodemographic, behavioural and clinical characteristics with P-values ≤ 0.05 obtained by bivariate analysis showed that Leptospira IgG seropositivity was associated only with professional occupation (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.01, 1.21; P = 0.01), alcohol consumption (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.14, 3.80; P = 0.01), ill clinical status (OR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.06, 3.35; P = 0.03), memory impairment (OR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.07, 3.18; P = 0.02) and a history of surgery (OR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.06, 2.69; P = 0.02) (Table 2).
Table 1.
Bivariate analysis of selected behavioural and housing characteristics and Leptospira seroprevalence in 413 inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico.
| Characteristic | Subjects tested*n |
Prevalence of Leptospira infection |
Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | Statistical significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | |||||
| Dogs at home | ||||||
| Yes | 336 | 96 | 28.6 | 0.70 | 0.41, 1.17 | NS |
| No | 77 | 28 | 36.4 | 1.00 | ||
| National trips | ||||||
| Yes | 326 | 107 | 32.8 | 1.98 | 1.11, 3.53 | P = 0.01 |
| No | 86 | 17 | 19.8 | 1.00 | ||
| Pork meat consumption | ||||||
| Yes | 372 | 116 | 31.2 | 1.86 | 0.83, 4.17 | NS |
| No | 41 | 8 | 19.5 | 1.00 | ||
| Pigeon meat consumption | ||||||
| Yes | 12 | 6 | 50.0 | 2.38 | 0.75, 7.56 | NS |
| No | 400 | 118 | 29.5 | 1.00 | ||
| Horse meat consumption | ||||||
| Yes | 17 | 2 | 11.8 | 0.29 | 0.06, 1.32 | NS |
| No | 396 | 122 | 30.8 | 1.00 | ||
| Raw dried meat of snake | ||||||
| Yes | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | – | – | NS |
| No | 411 | 122 | 29.7 | 1.00 | ||
| Raw milk consumption | ||||||
| Yes | 118 | 38 | 32.2 | 1.15 | 0.72, 1.82 | NS |
| No | 295 | 86 | 29.2 | 1.00 | ||
| Untreated water | ||||||
| Yes | 93 | 20 | 21.5 | 0.56 | 0.32, 0.98 | P = 0.04 |
| No | 320 | 104 | 32.5 | 1.00 | ||
| Alcohol consumption | ||||||
| Yes | 315 | 105 | 33.3 | 2.02 | 1.16, 3.52 | P = 0.01 |
| No | 96 | 19 | 19.8 | 1.00 | ||
| Washing hands before eating | ||||||
| Yes | 388 | 116 | 29.9 | 0.90 | 0.38, 2.15 | NS |
| No | 25 | 8 | 32.0 | 1.00 | ||
| Floor at home | ||||||
| Ceramic or wood | 291 | 95 | 32.6 | 1.00 | ||
| Concrete | 119 | 28 | 23.5 | 0.63 | 0.38, 1.03 | NS |
| Soil | 3 | 1 | 33.3 | 1.03 | 0.09, 11.51 | NS |
*Some values do not total 413 because of missing data.
NS, no significant association (P ≥ 0.05).
Table 2.
Multivariate analysis of selected characteristics of 413 inhabitants of Durango City, Mexico and their association with Leptospira infection.
| Characteristic | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional occupation | 1.11 | 1.01, 1.21 | P = 0.01 |
| National trips | 1.33 | 0.70, 2.51 | NS |
| Untreated water consumption | 0.61 | 0.34, 1.09 | NS |
| Alcohol consumption | 2.08 | 1.14, 3.80 | P = 0.01 |
| Ill clinical status | 1.88 | 1.06, 3.35 | P = 0.03 |
| Memory impairment | 1.85 | 1.07, 3.18 | P = 0.02 |
| History of surgery | 1.69 | 1.06, 2.69 | P = 0.02 |
NS, no significant association (P ≥ 0.05).
Discussion
This current cross-sectional study found that 30.0% of the study population had anti-Leptospira IgG antibodies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of Leptospira seroprevalence in an urban general population in northern Mexico. In a study in rural Durango, 15.6% seroprevalence of Leptospira infection was found.9 The seroprevalence of Leptospira infection found in the present study was higher than those reported in several population groups in Mexico including patients with liver diseases (22.7%),12 meat workers (17.7%),13 gardeners (6%)14 and waste pickers (4.4%).15 However, the seroprevalence found in the current study was lower than the 61% seroprevalence found in dog owners in the east central Mexican state of Veracruz (61%)16 and veterinarians in Mexico (38.8%).17 Differences in the Leptospira seroprevalence among groups can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the study populations. In the present study, seropositivity was associated with professional occupation; a high seroprevalence of Leptospira infection has been found in several occupational groups including garbage collectors,18 miners19 and wet market workers.20 Therefore, these current findings further confirm that Leptospira infection is an occupational disease. Leptospira IgG seropositivity was also associated with alcohol consumption in the current study. To the best of our knowledge no previous report describes this association. In the current study, seropositivity to Leptospira was associated with an ill clinical status, memory impairment and a history of surgery. Leptospira may cause central nervous system involvement.21 Therefore, a memory impairment might occur during infection. On the other hand, Leptospira infection has been linked to several clinical conditions leading to surgery. For example, leptospirosis mimicking acute cholecystitis has been reported.22 Further research on the association between Leptospira infection and a history of surgery and memory impairment should be conducted.
None of the samples in the current study was positive for Leptospira DNA. False-positive cases identified via the ELISAs were ruled out by the use of positive and negative controls. It is thought that the PCR was unable to detect the Leptospira DNA in the blood samples as a result of a low concentration of bacterial DNA in the samples. A previous study reported that at least 10 pg of bacterial DNA are necessary for detection with this method.23 The efficacy of the PCR procedure was confirmed by using the β-globin gene as a positive internal control.
In conclusion, this is the first study to describe the seroepidemiology of Leptospira infection in an urban general population in the north of Mexico. The seroprevalence of Leptospira infection found in the general population in Durango City was higher than those previously reported in Mexican studies.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding: This study was supported by Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico.
ORCID iD: Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-6052
References
- 1.Marinova-Petkova A, Guendel I, Strysko JP, et al. First Reported Human Cases of Leptospirosis in the United States Virgin Islands in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, September-November 2017. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6: ofz261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goarant C. Leptospirosis: risk factors and management challenges in developing countries. Res Rep Trop Med 2016; 7: 49–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cagliero J, Villanueva SYAM, Matsui M. Leptospirosis Pathophysiology: Into the Storm of Cytokines. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018; 8: 204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Garba B, Bahaman AR, Khairani-Bejo S, et al. Retrospective Study of Leptospirosis in Malaysia. Ecohealth 2017; 14: 389–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gulati S, Gulati A. Pulmonary manifestations of leptospirosis. Lung India 2012; 29: 347–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rajapakse S, Rodrigo C, Balaji K, et al. Atypical manifestations of leptospirosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2015; 109: 294–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Teixeira AF, Fernandes LGV, Cavenague MF, et al. Adjuvanted leptospiral vaccines: Challenges and future development of new leptospirosis vaccines. Vaccine 2019; 37: 3961–3973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Navarrete-Espinosa J, Acevedo-Vales JA, Huerta-Hernández E, et al. Prevalence of dengue and leptospira antibodies in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2006; 48: 220–228 [Article in Spanish, English abstract]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alvarado-Esquivel C, Sánchez-Anguiano LF, Hernández-Tinoco J. Seroepidemiology of Leptospira exposure in general population in rural Durango, Mexico. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 460578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Benacer D, Zain SNM, Lewis JW, et al. A duplex endpoint PCR assay for rapid detection and differentiation of Leptospira strains. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2017; 50: 239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iranpur-Mobarakeh V, Esmailizadeh AK. Rapid extraction of high quality DNA from whole blood stored at 4 °C for long period, http://www.protocol-online.org/prot/Protocols/Rapid-Extraction-of-High-Quality-DNA-from-Whole-Blood-Stored-at-4-C-for-Long-Period-4175.html (2010, accessed 23 March 2021).
- 12.Alvarado-Esquivel C, Sánchez-Anguiano LF, Hernández-Tinoco J, et al . Leptospira Exposure and Patients with Liver Diseases: A Case-Control Seroprevalence Study. Int J Biomed Sci 2016; 12: 48–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alvarado-Esquivel C, Hernandez-Tinoco J, Sanchez-Anguiano LF, et al. High Seroprevalence of Leptospira Exposure in Meat Workers in Northern Mexico: A Case-Control Study. J Clin Med Res 2016; 8: 231–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alvarado-Esquivel C, Hernandez-Tinoco J, Sanchez-Anguiano LF, et al. Leptospira Exposure and Gardeners: A Case-Control Seroprevalence Study. J Clin Med Res 2016; 8: 25–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alvarado-Esquivel C, Hernandez-Tinoco J, Sanchez-Anguiano LF, et al. Leptospira Exposure and Waste Pickers: A Case-Control Seroprevalence Study in Durango, Mexico. J Clin Med Res 2015; 7: 637–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lugo-Chávez BL, Velasco-Rodríguez LC, Canales-Velásquez G, et al . Detection of antileptospira antibodies in a vulnerable population of Ixhuatlancillo, Veracruz. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2015; 53: 158–163 [Article in Spanish, English abstract]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rivera-Benitez JF, Rosas-Estrada K, Pulido-Camarillo E, et al. Serological survey of veterinarians to assess the zoonotic potential of three emerging swine diseases in Mexico. Zoonoses Public Health 2014; 61: 131–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vasconcelos LM, Cisalpino EO, Vieira MN, et al. Anti-Leptospira agglutinins in different professional groups in the city of Londrina, Paraná. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1992; 25: 251–255 [Article in Portuguese, English abstract]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parveen SM, Suganyaa B, Sathya MS, et al. Leptospirosis Seroprevalence Among Blue Metal Mine Workers of Tamil Nadu, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016; 95: 38–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rahman MHAA, Hairon SM, Hamat RA, et al. Seroprevalence and distribution of leptospirosis serovars among wet market workers in northeastern, Malaysia: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18: 569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moestrup KS, Barfod TS, Holmgaard DB. Two cases of leptospirosis with involvement of the central nervous system. Ugeskr Laeger 2019; 181: V04190247 [Article in Danish, English abstract]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guarner J, Shieh WJ, Morgan J, et al. Leptospirosis mimicking acute cholecystitis among athletes participating in a triathlon. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 750–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fonseca Cde A, Teixeira MM, Romero EC, et al. Leptospira DNA detection for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis. J Infect 2006; 52: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
