Skip to main content
EMBO Molecular Medicine logoLink to EMBO Molecular Medicine
. 2021 Mar 30;13(4):e14002. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114002

Wnt signaling inhibition confers induced synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors

Stephane Angers 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8033510  PMID: 33787008

Despite considerable efforts, therapeutic strategies targeting the Wnt pathway are still not clinically available. The pervasive role of Wnt‐βcatenin signaling for the control of stem cells during normal tissue homeostasis makes the on‐target toxicity of available therapeutic grade molecules an important limitation preventing their clinical introduction. The article in this issue of EMBO Molecular Medicine by Kaur et al (2021) reveals that treatment of Wnt‐addicted cancer cells with inhibitors of Wnt signaling induces a state of BRCAness leading to hypersensitivity to PARP inhibitors. This is a new example of induced synthetic lethality that could pave the way for new indications for PARP inhibitors or may contribute to the long‐awaited clinical introduction of therapeutic agents targeting the Wnt pathway.

Subject Categories: Cancer, Regenerative Medicine


S. Angers discusses a new example of induced‐synthetic lethality reported by Kaur et al (this issue of EMBO Mol Med) that shows that treatment of Wnt‐addicted cancer cells with inhibitors of Wnt signaling induces a state of BRCAness leading to hypersensitivity to PARP inhibitors.

graphic file with name EMMM-13-e14002-g001.jpg


In recent years, the discovery that the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF43/ZNRF3 function as R‐spondin co‐receptors and as functional negative regulators of the Wnt pathway (de Lau et al, 2014) provided a molecular basis underlying the occurrence of RNF43 mutations and R‐spondin fusions in various cancers such as colorectal, pancreatic, ovarian, biliary tract, and gastric (Seshagiri et al, 2012; Giannakis et al, 2014). In these cancers, cells exhibit hyperactive Wnt‐βcatenin signaling and are addicted to the presence of circulating Wnt growth factors. Therapeutic opportunities for Wnt‐addicted cancers are the targeting of (i) Porcupine (PORCN) (Jiang et al, 2013), an acyltransferase enzyme responsible for the palmitoylation of Wnt proteins, and (ii) Frizzled receptors using inhibiting antibodies (Gurney et al, 2012; Steinhart et al, 2017). However, limiting dose toxicity is an inherent problem associated with widespread pathway inhibition.

The preferential therapeutic vulnerability of cells with a given genotype, for example, cancer cells, is derived from the genetic concept of synthetic lethality describing a context whereby mutation in either of two genes has little effect on cell viability, but mutations in both genes result in death (Huang et al, 2020). Perhaps most famously highlighting this paradigm is the exquisite sensitivity of cancer cells harboring mutations in the homologous recombination genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 to PARP inhibitors (Lord et al, 2015). The clinical efficacy of PARP inhibitors was rapidly demonstrated for tumor arising due to germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 but also due to the presence of somatic mutations within several other genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways such as ATM, ATR, PALB2, and the Fanconi anemia genes that commonly arise in a wide variety of tumors. This state of impaired HRR activity, which predicts the efficacy of PARP inhibitors, is commonly referred to as “BRCAness” as it phenocopies to some extent the germ line inactivation of the BRCA1/2 genes (Lord & Ashworth, 2016).

In this issue of EMBO Molecular Medicine, Kaur et al (2021) performed a chemical screen to identify genes that synergize with Porcupine inhibitors in Wnt‐addicted cancers. The combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib with the Porcupine inhibitor ETC‐159 revealed robust synergy in inhibiting the growth of various Wnt‐addicted cancer cell lines harboring mutations in RNF43 or R‐spondin fusion. This was also validated in vivo, as co‐treatment with both inhibitors resulted in synergistic tumor growth inhibition when compared to the individual treatment.

Mechanistically, Wnt signaling inhibition was found to reduce the expression of several genes involved in DNA damage repair and more specifically genes important for HRR and Fanconi anemia pathways. The authors showed that Wnt pathway inhibition leads to impaired HRR efficiency, thereby creating a cellular state of “BRCAness” that underlies the hypersensitivity to PARP inhibitor. Importantly, treatment of cells with Porcupine inhibitors for 48 h led to strong decrease in HRR and Fanconi anemia pathway genes without altering the percentage of cells in S phase, confirming that the observed effect could not merely be attributed to the role of Wnt signaling during cell cycle progression. In addition, the authors described a signaling axis downstream of βcatenin regulating the levels of MYBL2. Depletion of MYBL2 in Wnt‐addicted cancer cells led to inhibition of HRR and FA genes expression, and MYBL2 was enriched at promoters of several DNA repair genes in a Wnt signaling‐dependent manner. Interestingly, MYBL2 was not enriched at promoters of canonical βcatenin target genes, such as AXIN2, putatively revealing a novel transcriptional axis downstream of Wnt pathway activation. Whether the regulation of DNA repair genes was directly regulated by βcatenin, required LEF/TCF factors, or required physical interactions of these factors with MYBL2 was however not demonstrated and remains to be established.

This study provides an example of “induced synthetic lethality”, defined when a first chemical treatment (in this case an inhibitor of Wnt signaling) induces a vulnerable state in tumor cells that can be exploited by a second treatment (in this case a PARP inhibitor) (Fig 1). While Porcupine inhibitors provide an effective way to block Wnt signaling in the context of RNF43 mutations and R‐spondin fusions, they are ineffective in the context of tumors harboring more distal activating mutations in the pathway such as in APC, βcatenin, and AXIN1 found for example in the majority of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Extending their observations, the authors showed that a tankyrase inhibitor, which leads to Axin stabilization and to inhibition of βcatenin signaling, also decreased expression of HRR genes in CRC cells and synergized with a PARP inhibitor, hinting that this particular induced synthetic lethality interaction may be a general phenomenon. In fact, when examining the intestinal stem cell niche, expression of HRR genes was associated with the stem and transit‐amplifying cells that exhibit high Wnt‐βcatenin signaling activity. While control of DNA repair by the Wnt‐βcatenin pathway may represent a mechanism to protect tissue stem cells from various insults, this raises a potential limitation of leveraging combined Wnt and PARP inhibition as a cancer therapy, since this may be predicted to also affect the normal tissues. However, it was previously described that the intestinal stem cell stroma, which secrete Wnt proteins, is especially resistant to Porcupine inhibition due to their high expression of ABC transporters (Chee et al, 2018). It is therefore conceivable that combining synergistic doses of Porcupine and PARP inhibitors could result in heightened cytotoxicity in the tumor cells while sparing normal cells and thereby increasing the therapeutic window.

Figure 1. Synthetic lethality and induced synthetic lethality.

Figure 1

In normal cells or tumor cells without mutation within the homologous recombination repair or Wnt pathways, PARP and Wnt signaling inhibitors have minimal effect on cell proliferation. In BRCA1/2 mutant cells, PARP inhibitors lead to cell death. In Wnt‐addicted cancers, Porcupine inhibitors lead to cell cycle arrest and tumor growth inhibition. In Wnt‐addicted cancers, sublethal doses of Wnt‐βcatenin inhibitors induce a state of BRCAness sensitizing cells to PARP inhibitors.

Finally, the functional interaction between Wnt‐βcatenin signaling and the DNA damage pathways is distinct from the well‐established role of the Wnt pathway in progenitor cell self‐renewal. Consistent with this, synergy between Porcupine and PARP inhibitors was also observed in pancreatic cancer cell lines that harbor RNF43 mutations but that are resistant to Wnt pathway inhibition, possibly the result of additional mutations evading a requirement for βcatenin signaling for the proliferation of these cells. This result suggests that harnessing this induced synthetic lethal interaction could be effective in the context of tumors resistant to Wnt pathway inhibitors or alternatively slow down the emergence of therapeutic resistance.

EMBO Mol Med (2021) 13: e14002.

See also: A Kaur et al (April 2021)

References

  1. Chee YC, Pahnke J, Bunte R, Adsool VA, Madan B, Virshup DM (2018) Intrinsic xenobiotic resistance of the intestinal stem cell niche. Dev Cell 46: 681–695.e5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Giannakis M, Hodis E, Jasmine Mu X, Yamauchi M, Rosenbluh J, Cibulskis K, Saksena G, Lawrence MS, Qian ZR, Nishihara R et al (2014) RNF43 is frequently mutated in colorectal and endometrial cancers. Nat Genet 46: 1264–1266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gurney A, Axelrod F, Bond CJ, Cain J, Chartier C, Donigan L, Fischer M, Chaudhari A, Ji M, Kapoun AM et al (2012) Wnt pathway inhibition via the targeting of Frizzled receptors results in decreased growth and tumorigenicity of human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 11717–11722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang A, Garraway LA, Ashworth A, Weber B (2020) Synthetic lethality as an engine for cancer drug target discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 19: 23–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang X, Hao H‐X, Growney JD, Woolfenden S, Bottiglio C, Ng N, Lu B, Hsieh MH, Bagdasarian L, Meyer R et al (2013) Inactivating mutations of RNF43 confer Wnt dependency in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 12649–12654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaur A, Yi J, Lim S, Sepramaniam S, Patnaik S, Harmston N, Lee MA, Petretto E, Virshup DM, Madan B (2021) WNT inhibition creates a BRCA‐like state in Wnt‐addicted cancer. EMBO Mol Med 13: e13349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Lau W, Peng WC, Gros P, Clevers H (2014) The R‐spondin/Lgr5/Rnf43 module: regulator of Wnt signal strength. Genes Dev 28: 305–316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lord CJ, Ashworth A (2016) BRCAness revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 16: 110–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lord CJ, Tutt ANJ, Ashworth A (2015) Synthetic lethality and cancer therapy: lessons learned from the development of PARP inhibitors. Annu Rev Med 66: 455–470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seshagiri S, Stawiski EW, Durinck S, Modrusan Z, Storm EE, Conboy CB, Chaudhuri S, Guan Y, Janakiraman V, Jaiswal BS et al (2012) Recurrent R‐spondin fusions in colon cancer. Nature 488: 660–664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steinhart Z, Pavlovic Z, Chandrashekhar M, Hart T, Wang X, Zhang X, Robitaille M, Brown KR, Jaksani S, Overmeer R et al (2017) Genome‐wide CRISPR screens reveal a Wnt‐FZD5 signaling circuit as a druggable vulnerability of RNF43‐mutant pancreatic tumors. Nat Med 23: 60–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from EMBO Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES