Abstract
A simple hypertension treatment algorithm has contributed to the achievement of control rates greater than 85% for more than 1 million adults with hypertension across the United States. It is built on the fixed‐dose combination drug lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide, which is maximized in three steps before adding amlodipine. Spironolactone is the preferred fourth drug.
All of the evidence‐based national guidelines for the treatment of hypertension present alternative first‐line drug treatment classes, rather than specific drugs.1, 2, 3 Many patients with hypertension have comorbidities representing compelling indications for specific drug classes.1 Further complicating the primary care landscape is the presence of treatment options based on race, region of origin, and age.2 In the absence of evidence from clinical trials, these treatment algorithms generally add on alternative first‐line classes that were not selected in the first round. With so many acceptable drug sequence options, what is a busy clinician expected to do?
The tie breaker for a plethora of treatment options should be simplicity and successful implementation. In publicly reported US Medicare population HEDIS 2012 comparisons of 261 health plans representing 2011 data, Kaiser Permanente (KP) geographical regions accounted for 7 of the top 10 performers.4 KP regions are achieving greater than 85% hypertension control for a patient population of approximately 1.5 million adults and 88% for members with hypertension aged 65 to 85 years.4 Within the context of many chronic disease conditions, each demanding priority, a simple hypertension treatment protocol promotes performance (Figure1).
Figure 1.

Care Management Institute Kaiser Permanente national Adult Hypertension Treatment Algorithm (includes chronic kidney disease [CKD] stages 1–3 and diabetes; excludes CKD 4–5, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and pregnancy). HCTZ indicates hydrochlorothiazide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; K, potassium; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agent.
In 6 steps, 3 hypertension drugs are maximized. Spironolactone is the preferred fourth drug within specified safety parameters for primary care providers. Within KP, up‐titrations occur at 2‐ to 4‐week intervals with no copayment walk‐in blood pressure (BP) checks by medical assistants expanding the medical home and improving access.
Stepped‐Care Combination Therapy Promotes More Rapid Control and Improves Access
The Simplified Treatment Intervention to Control Hypertension Study (STITCH) was a cluster randomization trial demonstrating improved 6‐month hypertension control with a fixed‐dose combination scheme compared with traditional stepwise monotherapy.5 Reviews have enumerated the benefits of combination therapy including balanced and complementary physiologic mechanisms.6 The majority of patients require more than a single agent to control hypertension. A combination of a thiazide diuretic and an angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor balances opposing potassium effects. Use of an ACE inhibitor mitigates the calcium channel blocker (CCB) edema effect by allowing a lower dose of the CCB, possibly by reducing intracapillary hypertension induced by the CCB.7
Importantly, there is a medication delivery system rationale for more rapid control. Use of the KP hypertension treatment algorithm allows full dose treatment of two drugs with three direct or indirect patient encounters in 6 weeks. Important advantages of fixed‐dose combination therapy include (1) reduced patient copayments to promote medication adherence, and (2) improved access as a result of reduced patient contacts and appointments. Using a treatment intensification plan of ½ tablet, to 1 tablet, to 2 tablets guarantees use of all previous pills prior to the next step. Therefore, there is no wasted medication and no unused pills piling up and confusing the patient.
What About the ACCOMPLISH Trial?
The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed significant reduction in a primary combination endpoint favoring stepped‐care titration of fixed‐dose combination of an ACE inhibitor and a CCB over a stepped‐care fixed‐dose combination of ACE inhibitor and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).8 However, the ACCOMPLISH trial is not definitive because of suboptimal HCTZ dosing. Drug dosing should be based on hard cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoint outcome trials rather than drug doses in common usage. In the Intervention as a goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) trial, HCTZ 50 mg was used in a comparable dose to chlorthalidone 25 mg in ALLHAT, and outperformed the CCB comparator for both nonfatal myocardial infarction and hospitalized heart failure.9
The 24‐hour ambulatory BP substudy of ACCOMPLISH surprisingly showed equivalent nocturnal BP control comparing HCTZ 12.5 to 25 mg with amlodipine 5 to 10 mg in combination with identical milligram amounts of benazepril.10 If, in fact, 24‐hour BP control is truly the same, the significant difference in the primary combination endpoint was due to a pleiotropic drug effect. What we don't know is whether that effect is intrinsic to ACE inhibitor/CCB or to HCTZ underdosing. The KP hypertension treatment algorithm maximizes HCTZ to 50 mg when lisinopril/HCTZ is advanced to 20/25 mg × 2.
Improved hypertension control along with overall CVD risk factor reduction has been associated with reduction of myocardial infarction and stroke in the KP population.11, 12
HCTZ/ACE Inhibitor Combination Allows Inclusion of Patients With CKD and Diabetes
ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those with proteinuria.13 Unfortunately, CKD is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated,14, 15 and these patients are not receiving appropriate therapy to reduce the slope of renal decline. Some societies and treatment algorithms recommend ACE inhibitors or ARBs first line for patients with diabetes.16 Diabetes is also under‐recognized.17 Therefore, an HCTZ/ACE inhibitor combination allows preferential treatment for patients with CKD and diabetes, both with recognized and unrecognized disease. Accelerated BP control with combination drug therapy may reduce CVD events for higher‐risk patients.18, 19
HCTZ/ACE Inhibitor Combination Allows Inclusion of All Races and Age Groups
ALLHAT included a large prespecified group of African American patients and showed that a sufficient dose of thiazide‐type diuretic outperformed the ACE inhibitor and CCB comparators.20 The International Society of Hypertension in Blacks (ISHIB) has recommended prescription of thiazide‐type diuretic in doses showing benefit in successful CVD endpoint trials.21 Although systolic BP reduction in black patients is greater with thiazide‐type diuretics and CCBs compared with ACE inhibitor monotherapy, the combination of HCTZ with an ACE inhibitor equalizes racial responsiveness.22
Rationale for Spironolactone Dosing in the Kaiser Hypertension Treatment Algorithm
Spironolactone was selected as the preferred fourth drug in the KP hypertension treatment algorithm because of successful usage of this drug in the fourth position in the Anglo‐Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial‐Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT), as well as the general experience of spironolactone for resistant hypertension.23, 24 The KP treatment algorithm is directed towards primary care practitioners and doctors of pharmacy, and therefore the 12.5‐ to 25‐mg dose range is more constrained than usage up to 100 mg, which has been reported.25 The 12.5‐ to 25‐mg range carries significant efficacy.26 Specified safety net parameters for primary care prescription guard against the combination of renin‐angiotensin system blockade with spironolactone unopposed by HCTZ due to potentially dangerous hyperkalemia,27 restrict usage to patients with baseline potassium <4.5 mEq/L to avoid excess risk in patients already challenged by potassium homeostasis, and seek to reserve spironolactone use for CKD stage 3 and higher for practitioners with greater experience.
Research Gaps
There is a lack of hard clinical endpoint trials comparing adequately dosed combination therapy with sequential monotherapies. Combination therapy may include fixed‐dose combination pills as well as individual monotherapy pills taken together.
Take all Hypertensive Medications Together Once Daily in the Morning When You Brush Your Teeth
Patients are more likely to adhere to simple once‐daily prescription regimens. When pills are split between morning and bedtime applications, unnecessary complexity is introduced and medication adherence is more likely to falter. While of interest, the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Effects of Chronotherapy (MAPEC) study does not provide sufficient direction on which classes of medications may be more beneficial at bedtime and is further limited by the lack of hypertension control as determined by final clinic BP determinations.28 Medication adherence is improved with once‐daily regimens,29 and patients are less likely to experience early medication discontinuation when taking pills in the morning compared with the evening.30 Antihypertensive medications within the KP treatment algorithm are advised to be taken altogether with a habitual activity in the morning.
Conclusions: Simplicity Works
The simplicity of the KP hypertension treatment algorithm applies both to provider prescriptions and patient medication adherence. Simplicity means fewer steps, fewer pills, faster control, and fewer patient visits with improved primary care access. An HCTZ/ACE inhibitor combination promotes optimal treatment for patients with both recognized and unrecognized CKD and diabetes. Inclusion of HCTZ maximized to 50 mg represents excellent treatment for all races. Excess point‐of‐care decision alerts in the electronic health record that slow down busy workflows are avoided. A simple, easy‐to‐remember hypertension treatment algorithm for primary care providers has led to control rates of 88% for several regional KP health plans. Simplicity equals performance, and is an important component of treatment success.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013;15:874–877. DOI: 10.1111/jch.12182. ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
- 1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure . National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. National Clinical Guideline Centre . Hypertension. Clinical Management of Primary Hypertension in Adults. London, UK:National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2011. 36 (Clinical guideline; no. 127). [Google Scholar]
- 3. Daskalopoulou SS, Khan NA, Quinn RR, et al. The 2012 Canadian hypertension education program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. NCQA . Quality Compass® 2012. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/HEDISQualityMeasurement/QualityMeasurementProducts/QualityCompass.aspx (Accessed June 18, 2013).
- 5. Feldman RD, Zou GY, Vandervoort MK, et al. A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2009;53:646–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gradman AH, Basile JN, Carter BL, Bakris GL. Combination therapy in hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2010;4:42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Makani H, Bangalore S, Romero J, et al. Effect of renin‐angiotensin system blockade on calcium channel blocker‐associated peripheral edema. Am J Med. 2011;124:128–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high‐risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2417–2428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomized to double‐blind treatment with a long‐acting calcium‐channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: intervention as a goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet. 2000;356:366–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jamerson KA, Bakris GL, Weber MA. 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure in the ACCOMPLISH trial. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra MBA, et al. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2155–2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sidney S, Jaffe M, Nguyen‐Huynh MN, et al. Closing the gap between cardiovascular and cancer mortality in an integrated health care delivery system, 2000–2008: the Kaiser Permanente experience. Circulation. 2008;124:21S; A13610. [Google Scholar]
- 13. National Kidney Foundation . KDOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(Suppl 1):S1–S290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fox CH, Swanson A, Kahn LS, et al. Improving chronic kidney disease care in primary care practices: an upstate New York practice‐based research network (UNYNET) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:522–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jafar TH. Systemic hypertension and nondiabetic chronic kidney disease: the best evidence‐based therapeutic approach today. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005;9:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care in diabetes 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–S66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines clinical practice recommendations for diabetes chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(Suppl 2):S12–S154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Franklin SS, Neutel JM. Initial combination therapy for rapid and effective control of moderate and severe hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2009;23:4–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Maddox TM, Ross C, Tavel HM, et al. BP trajectories and associations with treatment intensification, medication adherence, and outcomes among newly diagnosed CAD patients. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:347–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive black and nonblack patients treated with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. JAMA. 2005;293:1595–1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Flack JM, Sica DA, Bakris G, et al. Management of high blood pressure in blacks. An update of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks Consensus Statement. Hypertension. 2010;56:780–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Veterans Administration Co‐operative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents . Racial differences in response to low‐dose captopril are abolished by the addition of hydrochlorothiazide. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;14:97S–101S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chapman N, Dobson J, Wilson S, et al. Effect of spironolactone on blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;49:839–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association professional education committee of the council for high blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Marrs JC. Spironolactone management of resistant hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1762–1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Handler J. Overlapping spironolactone dosing in primary aldosteronism and resistant essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:732–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Fujii H, Nakahama H, Yoshihara F, et al. Life‐threatening hyperkalemia during a combined therapy with the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan and spironolactone. Kobe J Med Sci. 2005;51:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojon A, Fernandez JR. Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int. 2010;27:1629–1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Coleman CI, Limone B, Sobieraj DM, et al. Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18:527–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, et al. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: longitudinal study of electronically complied dosing histories. BMJ. 2008;336:1114–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
