Skip to main content
Nutrition Journal logoLink to Nutrition Journal
letter
. 2021 Apr 8;20:34. doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00682-9

Reply to: Meta-analysis of vitamin D supplementation and hemoglobin concentration: methodological faults obscure the interpretation of the data

Seyyed Mostafa Arabi 1, Golnaz Ranjbar 1, Leila Sadat Bahrami 1, Abdolreza Norouzy 1,
PMCID: PMC8034115  PMID: 33832491

Dear Editor,

We would like to thank Mr. Raeisi-Dehkordi, et al. [1] for their interest and knowledgeable comments on our study.

We have followed the PRISMA guidelines according to the most recent research standards (page 3 of the article). PICOS was also used in the study design (amendments are made on page 2). While it is not compulsory to submit all systematic reviews at PROSPERO, all the principles mentioned in PROSPERO were followed. In the corrected version of the paper [2], we have clarified that no restrictions were placed on the gender, race, and geographical distribution of the individuals enrolled in the study. However, age restrictions were places such that the studies carried out in subjects with a mean age of ≥17.5 years old were included. Also, the type of supplementation has been corrected to include all types of vitamin D supplementation and not just oral vitamin D supplementation. According to the Cochrane handbook, including multiple comparisons from one study with a shared intervention group to the meta-analysis may lead to bias [3]. However, in many published articles this method has been used. Therefore, we decided to use this method based on previous research [4, 5]. According to your suggestion, the stated combination of supplementary studies [6, 7] were removed from the final analysis and a new Forrest plot was introduced. However, no changes in the results were observed (Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin. Data were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Forest plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on ferritin. Data were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Forest plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on transferrin saturation. Data were reported as MDs with 95% CIs

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Forest plot showing results of a meta-analysis on the effects of vitamin D supplementation on iron levels. Data were reported as SMDs with 95% CIs

Authors’ contributions

The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interests

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zimorovat A, Mohammadi-Sartang M, Barati-Boldaji R, et al. Meta-analysis of vitamin D supplementation and hemoglobin concentration: methodological faults obscure the interpretation of the data. Nutr J. 2021;20:22. 10.1186/s12937-021-00681-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Arabi SM, Ranjbar G, Bahrami LS, et al. Correction to: The effect of vitamin D supplementation on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2021;20:21. 10.1186/s12937-021-00679-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Wiley; 2019. 16.5.4 How to include multiple 173 groups from one study. Available from: https://handbook-5-174 1.cochrane.org/chapter_16/16_5_4_how_to_include_multiple_groups_from_one_study.htm [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Jackson JK, Patterson AJ, MacDonald-Wicks LK, Oldmeadow C, McEvoy MA. The role of inorganic nitrate and nitrite in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human evidence. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(5):348–371. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mazidi M, Rezaie P, Vatanparast H. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on C-reactive protein; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Nutr. 2018;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40795-017-0207-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dahlquist DT, Stellingwerff T, Dieter BP, McKenzie DC, Koehle MS. Effects of macro-and micronutrients on exercise-induced hepcidin response in highly trained endurance athletes. Appl Physiol, Nutr Metab. 2017;42(10):1036–1043. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hennigar SR, Gaffney-Stomberg E, Lutz LJ, Cable SJ, Pasiakos SM, Young AJ, et al. Consumption of a calcium and vitamin D-fortified food product does not affect iron status during initial military training: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(4):637–643. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nutrition Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES