Abstract
Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a type of hemorrhagic stroke that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. New effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes. The pathophysiology of SAH is complex and includes early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia, both of which are characterized by blood–brain barrier (BBB) impairment. We isolated brain endothelial cells (BECs) from mice subjected to SAH by injection of blood into the prechiasmatic cistern. We used gene expression profiling to identify 707 unique genes (2.8% of transcripts, 403 upregulated, 304 downregulated, 24,865 interrogated probe sets) that were significantly differentially expressed in mouse BECs after SAH. The pathway involving prostaglandin synthesis and regulation was significantly upregulated after SAH, including increased expression of the Ptgs2 gene and its corresponding COX-2 protein. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, limited upregulation of Ptgs2 in BECs. In this study, we have defined the gene expression profiling of BECs after experimental SAH and provide further insight into BBB pathophysiology, which may be relevant to other neurological diseases such as traumatic brain injury, brain tumours, ischaemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, and neurodegenerative disorders.
Subject terms: Blood-brain barrier, Cerebrovascular disorders
Introduction
Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a type of stroke that usually results from rupture of an intracranial aneurysm. Although it accounts for about 5% of all stroke, it is a particularly cruel affliction after which only about 25% of patients recover fully1. The etiology of brain injury after SAH encompasses factors such as transient global ischaemia, focal cerebral ischaemia, toxicity due to subarachnoid blood and secondary insults including direct brain damage from intracerebral haemorrhage, hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and increased intracranial pressure1,2. Preclinical studies suggest a common thread underlying these aetiologies is damage to the brain microvasculature. Microvascular vasoconstriction, poor vasomotor propagation, microthrombi, increased leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction, inversion of neurovascular coupling, and blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption all occur after experimental SAH2,3. More limited data in humans also supports the existence of these pathophysiologic processes after SAH4–6.
Targeting brain endothelial cells (BECs) of the BBB represents an ongoing therapeutic challenge7. Gene expression studies of BECs are lacking in SAH animal models. Our goal was to identify new therapeutic targets in SAH, specifically investigating brain endothelial factors in this hypothesis-generating study. We have isolated BECs from mice undergoing SAH using a prechiasmatic injection model and performed gene expression profiling. In this study, we identified the gene Ptgs2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2) and its corresponding protein COX-2 (Cycooxygenase-2) as a potential treatment target in SAH.
Results
Experimental SAH caused neurobehavioural impairment and brain injury
We had 4 experimental groups: SAH 24 h, Sham 24 h, SAH 48 h, and Sham 48 h (n = 8–11 per group). In the prechiasmatic blood injection mouse model of SAH, cerebral blood flow (CBF) acutely decreased after SAH with gradual recovery to 70–80% of baseline after 10 min (Supplementary Fig. S1). Mortality was 27% (3/11), typically occurring at the time of SAH (Fig. 1a). There was no mortality after a sham procedure, which involved insertion of a needle to the anterior cranial base without blood injection (0/8, Fig. 1a). No significant change in weight was seen after SAH (Supplementary Fig. S1). SAH caused neurobehavioural deficits based on the Modified Garcia Score at 24 h and 48 h (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. S1). SAH caused histological evidence of brain injury, including neuronal apoptosis (Caspase3 + NeuN + cells) and neuronal degeneration (Fluoro-jade B + cells) (Fig. 1c–f).
Experimental SAH caused blood–brain barrier impairment
In the prechiasmatic blood injection mouse model of SAH, BBB impairment was more prominent at 24 h than at 48 h as evidenced by extravascular leakage of fluorescent cadaverine dye (Fig. 2a,c). The leakage of fluorescent dye was particularly prominent in the left ventral cortex, in the region of the needle insertion, where the cadaverine dye was clearly extravascular with uptake into parenchymal cells (Fig. 2b,d). Consistent systemic intravascular uptake of the intraperitoneal-injected dye was seen, as evidenced by fluorescence of kidney tissue.
Viable endothelial cells were isolated from mouse brains
Endothelial cells were isolated from freshly extracted left cerebral hemispheres 24 h after SAH using magnetic-based methods (CD45–CD31 + cells). For confirmation of RT-PCR findings of CD45–CD31 + cells, endothelial cells were also isolated via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Tie2 + Pdgfrb- cells). These BEC suspensions had greater than 90% purity and greater than 80% viability (Fig. 3a–b, Supplementary Fig. S2). Each single biological replicate produced approximately 25,000 and 50,000 cells from the FACS-based and magnetic-based protocols, respectively. The isolated CD45–CD31 + endothelial cells revealed significant enrichment of endothelial gene transcripts (Pecam1, Tie2, Vegfr2) (Fig. 3c).
RNA was successfully extracted and amplified from mouse brain endothelial cells
There was a relatively low amount of RNA extracted from CD45–CD31 + endothelial cells, so the RNA was amplified in order to perform gene expression profiling. This amplified RNA demonstrated enrichment of endothelial genes but relatively low levels of genes characteristic of other cell types (Supplementary Fig. S3). In addition, the amplified RNA was enriched in genes characteristic of endothelial cells derived from the BBB (Slc2a1/Glut1, Abcb1a/Mdr1a), but exhibited relatively low levels of genes characteristic of endothelial cells derived from arteries, veins, or lymphatic vessels (Fig. 3d). A fixed amount of exogenous mRNA plasmid was added to the endothelial cell suspension prior to RNA extraction, confirming similar first strand and amplification efficiencies between biological replicates (Supplementary Fig. S4). Gene expression patterns pre- and post-amplification were similar (Supplementary Fig. S4).
SAH and sham mice demonstrated distinct endothelial gene expression patterns
Gene expression profiling of CD45–CD31 + BECs derived from SAH and sham mice showed distinct gene expression patterns based on Pearson’s correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), and unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Fig. 4a–c). Among 24,865 interrogated probe sets, 707 genes (2.8%) showed significant differential expression after SAH with 403 genes upregulated and 304 genes downregulated (Fig. 4d). In particular, 236 genes were significantly upregulated by at least 1.5-fold and 200 genes were significantly downregulated to less than 75% of baseline value. Genes with the highest fold changes are shown in Fig. 5a,b.
Inflammatory response genes were significantly upregulated in endothelial cells after SAH
There were no significant changes in genes related to BBB intercellular junctions after SAH (Supplementary Fig. S5). There was an overall modest downregulation of genes related to BBB transporters after SAH (Supplementary Fig. S6). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to determine relevant biological processes and pathways affected after SAH. A number of gene ontology biological processes, cellular components, molecular functions and pathways were affected by SAH, including most prominently “Inflammatory Response” and “Prostaglandin Synthesis and Regulation” (Tables 1, 2, Supplementary Fig. S7).
Table 1.
Gene ontology (GO) data sets | NES | FDR q-value |
---|---|---|
GO—biological process | ||
Inflammatory response | 1.76 | 0.091 |
Heterophilic cell–cell adhesion | 1.73 | 0.095 |
Oogenesis | 1.73 | 0.087 |
Regulation of apoptotic process | 1.72 | 0.081 |
Response to hydrogen peroxide | 1.71 | 0.086 |
Positive regulation of camp biosynthetic process | 1.71 | 0.084 |
Cell–cell adhesion | 1.70 | 0.082 |
Peptide cross-linking | 1.70 | 0.080 |
Cytokine production | 1.69 | 0.084 |
Response to lipopolysaccharide | 1.68 | 0.087 |
Activation of mapk activity | 1.68 | 0.086 |
Placenta development | 1.67 | 0.092 |
Regulation of blood pressure | 1.67 | 0.089 |
Superoxide metabolic process | 1.67 | 0.086 |
Response to oxidative stress | 1.66 | 0.095 |
Adult locomotory behaviour | − 2.14 | 0.01 |
Synaptic transmission | − 1.95 | 0.024 |
GO—cellular component | ||
Secretory granule | 1.73 | 0.081 |
High-density lipoprotein particle | 1.71 | 0.081 |
GO—molecular function | ||
Calcium-dependent protein binding | 1.79 | 0.093 |
Cytokine activity | 1.75 | 0.097 |
Protease binding | 1.70 | 0.083 |
Metallopeptidase activity | 1.70 | 0.083 |
Transporter activity | 1.69 | 0.077 |
FDR False-discovery rate, NES Normalized enrichment score.
Table 2.
Pathway analysis data sets | NES | FDR q-value |
---|---|---|
TH1 TH2 differentiation | 1.81 | 0.042 |
Prostaglandin synthesis and regulation | 1.75 | 0.067 |
Folate metabolism | 1.70 | 0.071 |
Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 1.70 | 0.056 |
Selenium pathway | 1.68 | 0.054 |
Monoamine transport | 1.67 | 0.050 |
Inflammatory response pathway | 1.66 | 0.051 |
EBV LMP1 signaling | 1.65 | 0.056 |
Selective expression of chemokine receptors during T-cell polarization | 1.64 | 0.072 |
Type II diabetes mellitus | 1.64 | 0.076 |
Apoptosis | 1.62 | 0.091 |
Complement and coagulation cascades | 1.62 | 0.086 |
IL4 signaling pathway | 1.61 | 0.093 |
Follicle stimulating hormone signaling pathway | 1.61 | 0.088 |
Matrix metalloproteinases | 1.60 | 0.089 |
IL-4 signaling pathway | 1.60 | 0.086 |
Cytoskeletal regulation by rho gtpase | 1.60 | 0.082 |
Role of mitochondria in apoptotic signaling | 1.58 | 0.097 |
Caspase cascade in apoptosis | 1.57 | 0.102 |
HIV-I NEF negative effector of FAS and TNF | 1.56 | 0.098 |
Chaperones modulate interferon signaling pathway | 1.55 | 0.099 |
KIT receptor signaling pathway | 1.55 | 0.100 |
IL-2 receptor beta chain in T cell activation | 1.54 | 0.099 |
FDR False-discovery rate, NES Normalized enrichment score.
Experimental SAH led to increased Ptgs2 (Cox-2) and Angpt2 expression in brain endothelial cells
Gene expression profiling of CD45–CD31 + BECs revealed increased expression of ptgs2 (Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, also known as Cyclooxygenase-2 or Cox-2) and angpt2 (Angiopoetin-2) after SAH. These results were validated with real-time PCR and confirmed in Tie2 + Pdgfrb − BECs isolated by a completely different methodology (Fig. 6a–d). There was corresponding increased Cox-2 immunofluorescence in brain blood vessels and increased Angpt2 protein expression in brain tissue (Fig. 6e,f). Related genes Ptgs1 (Cox-1) and Angpt1 demonstrated no change in expression after SAH (Fig. 6a–d). After SAH, there was increased Angpt2/Angpt1 protein expression ratio in brain tissue but not in serum (Fig. 6g, Supplementary Fig. S8).
Celecoxib limited upregulation of Ptgs2 (Cox-2) in brain endothelial cells after experimental SAH
The selective Cox-2 inhibitor celecoxib improved overall activity level but did not improve Modified Garcia Score after SAH (Supplementary Fig. S9). There was a trend toward decreased BBB disruption in the left ventral cortex in SAH mice treated with celecoxib (p = 0.15, Fig. 7a,b). However, there was no significant decrease in neuronal apoptosis/degeneration after SAH (Fig. 7c,d, Supplementary Fig. S9). Celecoxib did not affect Cox-2 protein expression in brain blood vessels but limited CD45–CD31 + BEC ptgs2 gene upregulation after SAH (Supplementary Fig. S9).
Discussion
Our study used a prechiasmatic injection model of SAH which demonstrated maximal BBB disruption at the 24 h time-point. We isolated BECs from mice with SAH. Using gene expression profiling with a microarray platform, we identified genes that were significantly differentially expressed in BECs after SAH. Pathways relevant to inflammation and prostaglandin signaling were upregulated in these cells. Ptgs2 (Cox-2) was upregulated at both the RNA and protein level and may represent a potential therapeutic target in SAH.
Prior preclinical gene expression studies used combined whole brain tissue (neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, etc.) and brain blood vessels (endothelial cells, pericytes, vascular smooth muscle cell, etc.), which may obscure gene expression changes in specific cell types8–14. Tissue samples from patients with SAH are difficult to obtain and have been limited to whole blood, cerebrospinal fluid, aneurysm fundus, and endovascularly-obtained endothelial cells from aneurysm lumens15–26. However, such samples provide limited information regarding brain injury and the blood brain barrier, and hence the need for preclinical studies7. More in-depth studies investigating BEC gene expression patterns are needed, especially in models of neurological diseases including SAH27.
Our study revealed several biologically relevant targets in BECs after SAH (Fig. 5). There was significant upregulation of Ptgs2/COX-2 and we chose to investigate this target further due to overall upregulation of the prostaglandin synthesis pathways. COX-2, an inducible enzyme that generate various prostaglandins, has been well-studied and is druggable with the clinically available selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib. Unlike COX-1-derived prostaglandins which provide house-keeping functions and gastric cytoprotection, COX-2-derived prostaglandins are upregulated in states of inflammation and cancer in response to cytokines and mitogens28. It is not surprising that celecoxib did not affect the protein expression of COX-2 after SAH given that it is merely an inhibitor. Celecoxib may limit inflammation by limiting PGE2 production and signaling through pro-inflammatory EP2 receptors29. However, we were surprised that celecoxib downregulated the mRNA expression of Ptgs2/COX-2. The mechanism of this downregulation is unclear.
COX-2 is also known to be constitutively expressed in kidney and brain tissue30. It is known that celecoxib can cross the BBB31. Patients with SAH have been treated with COX-2 inhibitors without clear adverse reactions32. There is concern for increased pro-thrombotic complications including myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in the setting of prolonged use of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with vascular risk factors33. The VIGOR (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research) clinical trial comparing rofecoxib, a select COX-2 inhibitor and naproxen, a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, found a significant increase in cardiovascular events in patients treated with rofecoxib34. The mechanism for the increased pro-thrombotic events was thought to be suppression of prostacyclin (PGI2), a vascular-protective prostaglandin28. For celecoxib, the PRECISION trial found no significant increased risk in myocardial infarction or stroke compared with ibuprofen or naproxen35. The lack of increased cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib was also seen in large retrospective clinical studies36,37.
COX-2 inhibitors have not been studied extensively in SAH patients. In preclinical studies, NS398, a COX-2 inhibitor, was used as treatment in a mouse endovascular perforation SAH model and was found to be neuroprotective38. COX-2 has been shown to be involved in the development of vasospasm via increased expression of endothelin-1 and activation of the JAK-STAT signalling cascade (Janus kinase-Signal transducer and activator of transcription)39–42. Celecoxib treatment was shown to attenuate vasospasm in a preclinical SAH model39. Celecoxib is known to antagonize L-type calcium channels, which can cause vasodilation43. EP4 is a downstream receptor for PGE2, which is produced by COX-2, and its activation was found to provide neuroprotection and BBB stability, and its antagonism was found to provide the reverse effect in a rat endovascular perforation SAH model44. However, EP4 is only one of 4 receptors for PGE2 (EP1, EP2, EP3, EP4), with each receptor having context-dependent proinflammatory versus anti-inflammatory signaling28.
COX-2 inhibitors may have additional benefits in SAH, including sodium retention to counteract cerebral salt wasting, and increased blood pressure, which may be a beneficial treatment for delayed cerebral ischemia after the ruptured aneurysm has been secured. A retrospective analysis of the clinical trial CONSCIOUS-1 comparing clazosentan to placebo in patients with SAH found that NSAID treatment during hospital admission was associated with improved clinical outcomes and decreased mortality32. Unfortunately, only a small number of patients were administered COX-2 inhibitors, preventing any conclusions regarding specific NSAIDs.
Angiopoietins are vascular growth factors which include Angpt1, an important vascular maintenance regulator through its signalling via the Tie2 receptor, and Angpt2, a vascular disruptive factor due to its partial antagonism of Tie2 signalling45. In many inflammatory diseases, Angpt2 is upregulated45. Prior studies have shown that hypoxia may upregulate Angpt2 in a COX-2-dependent manner46. However, in our study, COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly attenuate upregulation of Angpt2 after SAH. There are likely alternative pathways that lead to Angpt2 upregulation aside from prostanoid signaling.
Our study has several limitations. Although the BEC isolation methods were optimized to provide maximal efficiency, we cannot exclude ex vivo effects on gene expression changes secondary to the isolation process itself. For example, ex vivo exposure to thrombin can upregulate COX-2 expression in endothelial cells47. Our study used BECs derived from the left cerebral hemisphere, which had maximal BBB disruption in our SAH model. There may, however, be heterogeneity of gene expression in BECs from different brain compartments. Our immunofluorescence experiments looked at Cox-2 protein expression in vascular structures but without specific colocalization with endothlelial markers. Therefore, it is possible that the increased Cox-2 protein expression may not be related to or exclusive to endothelial cells, but rather vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes or perivascular macrophages. Although we have focused on endothelial-derived COX-2 signaling as a target after SAH, we have not excluded the potential beneficial effects of COX-2 antagonism in other cell types.
Future experiments could fully address the time-frame of BBB disruption in this prechiasmatic model of SAH including earlier and later time-points. Also, it would be interesting to see if temporal changes in BBB disruption correlate with endothelial Ptgs2/COX-2 expression. Further studies may examine the COX-2 downstream pathways including the expression and activity of mPGES-1, PGE2 and its respective receptors EP1-4.
In conclusion, we isolated BECs in an experimental SAH model and identified COX-2 as a potential therapeutic target. BBB impairment is part of the pathophysiology of several neurological diseases aside from SAH including ischaemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, brain tumours, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Our hypothesis-generating results from gene expression profiling of BECs may have relevance to these other neurological diseases. The selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib is clinically available and may be studied further as a potential treatment for SAH.
Materials and methods
All protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee at St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. All experiments were performed in accordance with Animal Care Committee guidelines and regulations. Reporting of the results follow ARRIVE guidelines. Full details of materials and methods are described in the supplement.
Animals
Tg(Tie2GFP)287Sato/J transgenic mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) were used in the BBB assessment with cadaverine dye experiments and isolation of Tie2 + Pdgfrb- BECs. All other experiments used wild-type FVB/NJ mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME).
Prechiasmatic injection SAH model
Details of the SAH model have been described48. Mice were placed under anaesthesia using inhaled isoflurane and then turned prone with the skull fixed in a stereotactic apparatus. A mid-line dorsal incision over the skull was created and a burr hole made 1 mm anterior to the olfactory sulcus and 1 mm to the left of midline. A 27-gauge needle was inserted through the burr hole at 37.5 degrees from the vertical plane down to the skull base, after which 80 microL of whole blood obtained from a littermate was injected. The sham procedure involved needle insertion without blood injection. After 2 min, the needle was removed and the incision closed. The mice were allowed to recover for 24 h to 48 h after the procedure.
Neurobehavioural assessments
Mice were assessed on the Modified Garcia Score at 24 h and 48 h by 2 assessors in a blinded fashion49.
Histological assessment of brain injury
Coronal slices of mouse brains 24 h after SAH or sham procedure were fixed and stained for fluoro-jade B (Histo-Chem Inc., Jefferson, AK) and caspase 3 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) to detect degenerated and apoptotic neurons respectively.
Blood brain barrier assessment
Fluorescent cadaverine dye was administered via intraperitoneal injection 2 h prior to transcardiac perfusion. Microscopy was used to image whole brains and coronal brain slices.
Brain endothelial cell isolation
Cell suspensions were created from left cerebral hemispheres via mechanical and enzymatic dissociation. Endothelial cells were then isolated by two protocols: (1) Tie2 + Pdgfrb- endothelial cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and (2) CD45–CD31 + endothelial cells by magnetic bead sorting (Supplementary Fig. S10). Purity and viability of cell suspensions were assessed by flow cytometry.
RNA extraction and microarray analysis
RNA was extracted from endothelial cell suspensions using commercially available kits including RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen Inc., Venlo, Netherlands) and Arcturus PicoPure RNA isolation kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Isolated RNA was then spiked with 0.25 ng of exogenous luciferase plasmid (pSP-luc + NF cloning vector, U47123.2) and then underwent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Isolated RNA from CD45–CD31 + BECs was amplified with Ovation Pico WTA System V2 (NuGEN, Redwood City, CA). Amplified RNA was then labeled with Encore Biotin Module (NuGEN, Redwood City, CA) and hybridized to Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Analysis was completed with R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R version 3.2.2). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with Gene Set Knowledgebase (“gskb”) was used to identify enriched pathways50. The dataset has also been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and is accessible by accession number GSE155137 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE155137).
Celecoxib treatment
Celecoxib (10 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO) dissolved in 100 µL of 50:50 DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide):normal saline was administered via intraperitoneal injection 30 min and 12 h after SAH or sham procedure. Vehicle consisted of 100 µL of 50:50 DMSO:normal saline solution.
Statistics
Unless otherwise stated, data were presented as means ± standard errors. Comparisons between 2 groups were made using Student’s t test for parametric data and Mann–Whitney U test for non-parametric data. Comparisons between multiple groups were made using ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post hoc correction for parametric data and Kruskal–Wallis test for non-parametric data. Aside from the microarray analysis (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R version 3.2.2), all statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA).
Conference presentation
Portions of this work have been presented at the following conferences: American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) annual meeting in Chicago, IL (May 1, 2016); Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (CNSF) annual congress in Quebec City, QC (June 22, 2016); and the International Stroke Conference (ISC) in Houston, TX (Feb 23, 2017). This results of this study have previously been published in the form of a PhD thesis at the University of Toronto.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
MKT received the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Neurosurgery Research Education Foundation (NREF) AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section Research Fellowship. BB was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Grants: BO 4229/1-1, BO 4229/2-1 (Novel strategies to protect the neurovascular unit). RLM received grant support from CIHR, Heart & Stroke Foundation, and Physicians’ Services Incorporated Foundation (PSIF). RLM is chief scientific officer of Edge Therapeutics Inc. Dr. Andrew Baker, St. Michael’s Hospital, provided guidance as a PhD program advisory committee member. Academic support was also received from members of Dr. Philip Marsden’s lab and Dr. R. Loch Macdonald’s lab. The Princess Margaret Genomics Centre assisted with performing the microarray hybridization and bioinformatics analysis. The St. Michael’s Hospital core facility staff (Xiaofeng Lu, Cat Di Ciano, Pam Plante, Chris Spring) also provided training for the experiments described. Youdong Wang, research technician for Dr. Xiao-Yan Wen’s lab, provided assistance with the whole brain fluorescent microscopy.
Author contributions
Conception and design: M.K.T., P.A.M., R.L.M. Experiments: M.K.T., P.T., B.B., C.K.L., T.N., J.D., J.A. Analysing data: M.K.T., P.T., B.B., R.L.M. Interpreting Results: M.K.T., P.T., P.A.M., R.L.M. Drafting and revising the manuscript: M.K.T., B.B., P.A.M., R.L.M. Approval of final manuscript version: All authors.
Data availability
The dataset generated from this study can be found in Supplementary Table S3. The dataset has also been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and is accessible by accession number GSE155137 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE155137).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-87301-z.
References
- 1.Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2017;389:655–666. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30668-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Macdonald RL. Delayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:44–58. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tso MK, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: A review of experimental studies on the microcirculation and the neurovascular unit. Transl. Stroke Re. 2014;5:174–189. doi: 10.1007/s12975-014-0323-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bosche B, et al. Recurrent spreading depolarizations after subarachnoid hemorrhage decreases oxygen availability in human cerebral cortex. Ann. Neurol. 2010;67:607–617. doi: 10.1002/ana.21943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosche B, Mergenthaler P, Doeppner TR, Hescheler J, Molcanyi M. Complex clearance mechanisms after intraventricular hemorrhage and rt-PA treatment-a review on clinical trials. Transl. Stroke Res. 2020;11:337–344. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00735-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lublinsky S, et al. Early blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicts neurological outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. EBioMedicine. 2019;43:460–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bosche B, Macdonald RL. Letter by Bosche and Macdonald regarding article, "relevance of blood-brain barrier disruption after endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke: Dual-energy computed tomographic study". Stroke. 2015;46:e126–127. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.009131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Peng J, et al. High-throughput sequencing and co-expression network analysis of lncRNAs and mRNAs in early brain injury following experimental subarachnoid haemorrhage. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:46577. doi: 10.1038/srep46577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zheng B, et al. Expression signatures of long non-coding RNAs in early brain injury following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;12:967–973. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kikkawa Y, et al. Upregulation of relaxin after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in rabbits. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:836397. doi: 10.1155/2014/836397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kurogi R, et al. Upregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 contributes to restoration of the extracellular matrix in the rabbit basilar artery during cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2015;1616:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee CI, et al. Immune and inflammatory gene signature in rat cerebrum in subarachnoid hemorrhage with microarray analysis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012;5:118–125. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sasahara A, et al. Gene expression in a canine basilar artery vasospasm model: a genome-wide network-based analysis. Neurosurg. Rev. 2008;31:283–290. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0135-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vikman P, Beg S, Khurana TS, Hansen-Schwartz J, Edvinsson L. Gene expression and molecular changes in cerebral arteries following subarachnoid hemorrhage in the rat. J. Neurosurg. 2006;105:438–444. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.3.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Su XW, et al. Circulating microRNA 132–3p and 324–3p profiles in patients after acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0144724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lai NS, 2017. Serum microRNAs are non-invasive biomarkers for the presence and progression of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Biosci. Rep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Kikkawa Y, et al. Altered expression of microrna-15a and Kruppel-like factor 4 in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2017;108:909–916.e903. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stylli SS, et al. miRNA expression profiling of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 2017;126:1131–1139. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.Jns151454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bache S, et al. MicroRNA changes in cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2017;48:2391–2398. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pera J, et al. Gene expression profiles in human ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: What is the role of inflammation? Stroke. 2010;41:224–231. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.562009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kurki MI, et al. Upregulated signaling pathways in ruptured human saccular intracranial aneurysm wall: an emerging regulative role of Toll-like receptor signaling and nuclear factor-κB, hypoxia-inducible factor-1A, and ETS transcription factors. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:1667–1675. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318210f001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kleinloog R, et al. RNA sequencing analysis of intracranial aneurysm walls reveals involvement of lysosomes and immunoglobulins in rupture. Stroke. 2016;47:1286–1293. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.012541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu D, et al. Genome-wide microRNA changes in human intracranial aneurysms. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:188. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0188-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang W, et al. Aberrant expression of lncRNAs and mRNAs in patients with intracranial aneurysm. Oncotarget. 2017;8:2477–2484. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakaoka H, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals distinct molecular signatures associated with the rupture of intracranial aneurysm. Stroke. 2014;45:2239–2245. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.005851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cooke DL, et al. Endovascular biopsy: In vivo cerebral aneurysm endothelial cell sampling and gene expression analysis. Transl. Stroke Res. 2018;9:20–33. doi: 10.1007/s12975-017-0560-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huntley MA, Bien-Ly N, Daneman R, Watts RJ. Dissecting gene expression at the blood-brain barrier. Front. Neurosci. 2014;8:355. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.FitzGerald GA. COX-2 and beyond: Approaches to prostaglandin inhibition in human disease. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2003;2:879–890. doi: 10.1038/nrd1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang J, et al. Inhibition of the prostaglandin receptor EP2 following status epilepticus reduces delayed mortality and brain inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3591–3596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218498110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Simmons DL, Botting RM, Hla T. Cyclooxygenase isozymes: The biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004;56:387–437. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.3.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dembo G, Park SB, Kharasch ED. Central nervous system concentrations of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in humans. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:409–415. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nassiri F, et al. A propensity score-matched study of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit. Care. 2016;25:351–358. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0266-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pirlamarla P, Bond RM. FDA labeling of NSAIDs: Review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cardiovascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2016;26:675–680. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bombardier C, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:1520–1528. doi: 10.1056/nejm200011233432103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nissen SE, et al. Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, naproxen, or ibuprofen for arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Andersohn F, Schade R, Suissa S, Garbe E. Cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of ischemic stroke: A nested case-control study. Stroke. 2006;37:1725–1730. doi: 10.1161/01.Str.0000226642.55207.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hirayama A, et al. Assessing the cardiovascular risk between celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Circ. J. 2014;78:194–205. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ayer R, Jadhav V, Sugawara T, Zhang JH. The neuroprotective effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition in a mouse model of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2011;111:145–149. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0693-8_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Munakata A, Naraoka M, Katagai T, Shimamura N, Ohkuma H. Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in relation to nitric oxide and endothelin-1 on pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rabbit. Transl. Stroke Res. 2016;7:220–227. doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Osuka K, Suzuki Y, Watanabe Y, Takayasu M, Yoshida J. Inducible cyclooxygenase expression in canine basilar artery after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1998;29:1219–1222. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.6.1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Osuka K, et al. Activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the rat basilar artery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2006;1072:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tran Dinh YR, et al. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in rabbit basilar artery endothelial cells after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:626–633. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brueggemann LI, Mani BK, Mackie AR, Cribbs LL, Byron KL. Novel actions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on vascular ion channels: Accounting for cardiovascular side effects and identifying new therapeutic applications. Mol. Cell Pharmacol. 2010;2:15–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu J, Xu Z, Yan A. Prostaglandin E2 EP4 receptor activation attenuates neuroinflammation and early brain injury induced by subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. Neurochem. Res. 2017;42:1267–1278. doi: 10.1007/s11064-016-2168-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Akwii RG, Sajib MS, Zahra FT, Mikelis CM. Role of angiopoietin-2 in vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Cells. 2019 doi: 10.3390/cells8050471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pichiule P, Chavez JC, LaManna JC. Hypoxic regulation of angiopoietin-2 expression in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:12171–12180. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305146200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Minami T, et al. Thrombin and phenotypic modulation of the endothelium. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004;24:41–53. doi: 10.1161/01.Atv.0000099880.09014.7d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sabri M, et al. Anterior circulation mouse model of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2009;1295:179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sherchan P, et al. Minocycline improves functional outcomes, memory deficits, and histopathology after endovascular perforation-induced subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats. J. Neurotrauma. 2011;28:2503–2512. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Lai NS, 2017. Serum microRNAs are non-invasive biomarkers for the presence and progression of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Biosci. Rep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The dataset generated from this study can be found in Supplementary Table S3. The dataset has also been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and is accessible by accession number GSE155137 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE155137).