Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Apr 9;11:7821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86887-8

Dynamic control of spin-wave propagation

Jan-Niklas Toedt 1,, Wolfgang Hansen 1
PMCID: PMC8035400  PMID: 33837235

Abstract

In this work we present a method to dynamically control the propagation of spin-wave packets. By altering an external magnetic field the refraction of the spin wave at a temporal inhomogeneity is enabled. Since the inhomogeneity is spatially invariant, the spin-wave impulse remains conserved while the frequency is shifted. We demonstrate the stopping and rebound of a traveling Backward-Volume type spin-wave packet.

Subject terms: Ferromagnetism, Spintronics, Electronic and spintronic devices

Introduction

Spin waves offer an outstanding external controllability of their properties due to the dependence on strength and orientation of externally applied magnetic fields. This appealing possibility is commonly used to alter the system in which a spin wave propagates, e.g., altering the emitted spin-wave patterns of magnetic structures1,2, tailoring the band structure in magnonic crystals3,4, or tuning the resonance frequency of spin-wave resonators57. Apart from some exceptions (discussed, e.g. by Chumak et al.8), such investigations were limited to statically defined systems, e.g. redirecting spin waves in spatially heterogeneous but statically defined magnetization patterns9,10, thus disregarding the capability to dynamically alter the spin-wave properties in the timescale of spin-wave propagation. First investigations on refraction of spin waves at spatial variations of the medium, i.e., a change of the film thickness, were performed most recently11,12. In a study by Serga et al. a concept to store spin-wave pulses using a time-variant magnetic field was demonstrated13. However, this concept relied on the conversion of propagating spin waves into non-propagating spin-wave modes present in the specific mode scheme of the stripline, limiting the application to a small number of systems. On the other hand, the manipulation of waves by means of a dynamic change of the dispersion relation or the restoring force is an emerging field demonstrated for capillary-gravity waves14 and light in waveguides15, despite the comparably limited access to a fast controllability of the wave properties. Here, we will expand the concept to the dynamic manipulation of the propagation anisotropy, providing a scheme to remotely and arbitrarily control the propagation of a spin-wave packet. Furthermore, in recent years the generation of isolated Backward-Volume type spin-wave packets has experienced some advances16,17. Due to the strong magnetic-field dependence of their group velocity and their highly anisotropic nature, such wave packets are the ideal candidate for the prospect of this article.

In this work we discuss the redirection of running spin-wave packets via refraction at a temporal change of the medium, i.e., by altering an externally applied magnetic field while the spin wave packet propagates. The descriptive boundary condition is the conservation of the wave vector. We demonstrate, by means of micromagnetic simulations, the stopping and rebound of a Backward-Volume type spin wave-packet. We propose the expansion of the concept to remotely steer spin-wave packets by rotating the external magnetic field.

The eponymous trait of Backward-Volume waves is their negative group velocity at low wave numbers, meaning that the envelope of a wave-packet and the wave crests travel in opposite direction. All wave numbers above a certain threshold wave number have positive group velocity and a wave number exists at which the group velocity vanishes, i.e. the envelope of a wave packet stands still. Figure 1a displays three dispersion relations at different applied magnetic fields, considering a permalloy film of t=20nm thickness, calculated using the model by Kalinikos and Slavin for spin waves in thin films18. The black dots mark the wave vectors with vanishing group velocity, which also mark the change from negative to positive group velocity. With rising magnetic field, the threshold wave number increases. If we consider a Backward-Volume wave packet generated at an external field of μ0H0=16mT with a central frequency of fc=4GHz the central wave number will be kc=15.8μm-1, according to the dispersion relation. When the magnetic field strength is rapidly altered in a spatially homogeneous fashion, the spatial distribution of the spin-wave packet remains untouched and the wave number is conserved. On the other hand the Zeeman-energy term is changed, thus energy and frequency of the spin wave are altered. As the wave-number distribution of a wave packet is not affected by altering the external field, it is thus possible to shift the threshold wave number onto and beyond the central wave number of the packet, thus effectively stopping or reversing the propagation of a wave packet’s envelope. Figure 1b shows the group velocity of a Backward-Volume wave with the wave number kc in dependence of the external magnetic field strength, calculated as

vg(Hext)=2πddkf(k,Hext)|k=kc, 1

assuming translation invariance and thus wave-vector conservation. If spatial heterogeneities of the medium or magnetic field occur (e.g. at the borders of a magnetic film) the wave-vector composition of the wave packet will be altered.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Dispersion relations of Backward-Volume waves for three magnetic field strengths. The black dots mark the wave vectors with vanishing group velocity. (b) Group velocity at fixed wave number k=15.8μm-1 for varying magnetic field strength. The colored circles mark the field strengths used in panel (a). (c) Time profile of the exciting magnetic field (blue) and the external magnetic field Hext (red) with target field Hstop=139mT.

Methods

A set of micromagnetic simulations, using OOMMF19, was conducted to verify this concept. Here we consider a 20nm thick permalloy film, which is 320μm long in the Backward-Volume direction (hereafter x direction). In the out-of-plane direction (here after z direction) the simulation volume is constrained to a single cell. In y direction the simulation volume extents over 4 cells (20nm) and translation symmetry is approximated by periodic boundary conditions. The exchange constant used is A=1.3×10-11J m-3; the saturation magnetization was set as MS=803.7kA m-1. Our material of choice for purpose of demonstration is permalloy to stress that the demonstrated approach does not depend on the choice of the specific material. To enhance the quality of the simulations we chose α=2×10-3 as Gilbert damping parameter, a value which is only a quarter of the real Gilbert damping parameter in permalloy. It is still achievable using other materials, such as Cobalt alloys20.

A modulated Gaussian pulse of the out of plane magnetic field (Hz) with a modulation frequency of fc=4GHz and FWHM of 3.3ns excites a Backward-Volume pulse with a central wave vector of kc=15.8μm-1. The spatial distribution of the excitation field is of Gaussian shape with a FWHM of 133nm in the center of the film (x=0), exciting two wave packets propagating in opposite directions. For the example of stopping a wave packet, the magnetic field is increased from μ0H0=16mT to μ0Hstop=139mT over 4ns, beginning 8ns after the pulse peak. The time dependences of the exciting magnetic field pulse and the external magnetic field are depicted in Fig. 1c. For the demonstration of propagation reversal, the target magnetic field strength is substituted with μ0Hrev=350mT.

Due to the finite size of the simulated film in the direction of the magnetic field (x) an in-plane demagnetization field remains, weakening the total internal field. The demagnetization field is calculated following Joseph and Schlömann21, retaining a value of μ0Hdemag=1.0mT at x=0. A corrected form of the dispersion relation for thin films by Kalinikos and Slavin18 was obtained by subtracting the demagnetization field from the externally applied field, yielding

f=γμ02πHext-Hdemag+2Aμ0MS·Hext-Hdemag+2Aμ0MSk2+MSF, 2

where Hext-Hdemag is the static internal field, with the gyroscopic ratio γ=176GHz T-1, the film thickness t and the vacuum permeability μ0=1.625μH m-1. The in-plane wave-vectors parallel and orthogonal to the static magnetic field are denoted by k|| and k, respectively. Furthermore, F is given by

F=1-Pk||2k2+P1-PMSHext-Hdemag+2Aμ0MSk2k2k2, 3

with

P=1-1-e-ktkt, 4

Here we neglect dynamic in-plane demagnetization fields arising due to the finite lateral extent of the ferromagnetic film, since the static correction is sufficient for the purpose of this paper.

Results

An excerpt of the simulation is depicted in Fig. 2. In the left hand panel the increase of the external field to μ0Hstop=139mT is plotted, while the right hand panel shows the simulation for an increase to μ0Hrev=350mT. The spin-wave packets are formed at x=0, propagating in both directions. The packets separate from another and continue to propagate with constant velocity. After the field increase (beginning at t=15.5ns) the envelope of the wave packet remains fixed for the left hand panel, while the direction of propagation is reversed for the right hand panel.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Plots of Mz for the simulations of a stopped (left-hand side) and a reversed (right-hand side) Backward Volume pulse.

Figure 3a,b show the Magnetization component Mz plotted against the coordinate x and the elapsed time t for both the stopping as well as the reversal of the spin wave packet. The white dashed lines indicate the maxima of the spin-wave pulses; the black dashed lines mark the beginning (t1) and end (t2) of the field increase. By tracing the position of the wave envelope’s maxima the central group velocity can be determined. The unaltered wave packet exhibits a group velocity of v0=450.22m s-1. At Hstop the packet exhibits a residual group velocity of vstop=-0.88m s-1, and the wave packet at Hrev has a group velocity of vrev=-171.07m s-1, hence propagating back towards the origin of the wave packet. Closeups of the vertical Magnetization Mz are provided in Fig. 3c–e.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a,b) Plots of the out-of-plane magnetization Mz for simulations with an increase of the external magnetic field from μ0H0=16mT to μ0Hstop=139mT (a) and μ0Hrev=350mT (b). (ce) Closeups of of Mz (f) Plots of the normalized temporal Fourier transforms at H0 (black), Hstop (blue), and Hrev (red).

By taking the Fourier transform of the magnetization using time windows before and after the field increase, the frequency distributions for the respective windows can be determined as depicted in Fig. 3f. Due to different window lengths available for the Fourier transform, the widths of the spectral distributions are not comparable. The initial central frequency of the pulse is, in agreement with the excitation, 4.02GHz. At Hstop and Hrev the central frequency increases to fstop=10.76GHz and frev=18.42GHz, respectively. The expected frequencies, according to the dispersion relation, are fstop=10.72GHz and frev=18.51GHz.

It is noteworthy that the spin-wave packets decay quicker after the field increase, especially for Hrev. The cause for the accelerated attenuation is found in the frequency dependence of the magnon lifetime22,23. Since the lifetime decreases with increasing spin-wave frequency, and the frequency of a spin wave with fixed wave number increases with the magnetic field, the lifetime is reduced when the magnetic field grows.

The wave-number distribution of the spin waves is depicted in Fig. 4. The excited central wave number is determined from the spatial Fourier transform as kc=15.8μm-1, which is also the intended central wave number. Most importantly, in both simulations, the central wave number remains unaltered during and after the field increase in agreement with the postulated conservation of the wave number. In Fig. 4c,d profiles of the wavevector spectra are depicted for times t=14ns just before and t=21ns after the field increase.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Time dependent spatial Fourier transform of Mz for simulations of a field increase to Hstop (a) and Hrev (b). The white dashed line marks the central wave number kc determined from the Fourier transforms. Profiles of the spectra at t=14ns and t=21ns are provided in panels (c) and (d) for simulations of a field increase to Hstop and Hrev, respectively.

Additionally, in Fig. 4b a boost of the Fourier amplitude is discernible during the field increase, attributed to the raising of the ratio between the external bias field and the dynamic out-of-plane demagnetization field. Since the out-of-plane demagnetization field reduces the out-of-plane component Mz of the spin-wave, and thus the relative strength of the dynamic out-of-plane demagnetization field, the out-of-plane spin-wave amplitude increases with the external magnetic field.

Extension to redirection of spin waves

Based on the demonstrated wave-number conservation the concept of the dynamic propagation control can be extended to the two-dimensional case. For demonstration purposes we will again discuss a BV wave packet with a central frequency of fc=4GHz and the same medium as before. Here it is helpful to use the concept of the isofrequency curve, which is the set of wave vectors with identical frequency, according to the dispersion relation. The group velocity, which is the gradient of the frequency in k space, is always perpendicular on the isofrequency curve. In Fig. 5a reversal of the wave-packet propagation is depicted. The black line marks the isofrequency curve for the wave packet’s initial central frequency of fc=4GHz at an external field of μ0H0=16m T, while the red curve marks the isofrequency curve at an external magnetic field of μ0Hrev=350m T. Both isofrequency curves encompass the central wave vector kc (gray dot) as required by the wave-vector conservation. The initial group velocity v0 is marked by a black arrow and group velocity vrev after the field increase is marked by a red arrow. Figure 5b illustrates a rotation of the external magnetic field. Again, the black line depicts the isofrequency curve for the initial situation, i.e., the field is oriented in x direction (θ=0). All parameters are identical to the precedent simulations. If, for example, the external field is tilted by 10, the static orientation of the magnetization adapts accordingly and the long axis of the isofrequency curve is also tilted by 10. Considering a spatially homogeneous field-orientation change, the wave vector, again, remains conserved and the frequency of the spin-wave packet is altered. This means, the isofrequency curve for the new central frequency and field orientation will still include the unaltered central wave vector, as marked by the grey dot. The central frequency changes accordingly to fc=4.36GHz. The according isofrequency curve is depicted in Fig. 5 in blue color. The group velocity v10 belonging to kc is now tilted by 70. It is thus possible to remotely steer spin-wave packets by rotating an external magnetic field. In combination with altering the field strength any orientation of the group velocity is achievable. Furthermore a Backward-Volume spin wave can be converted to a Damon–Eshbach spin wave (strongly boosting the frequency) and vice versa by rotating the external field 90.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Illustration of the reversal of a spin-wave packet in the reciprocal space. The initial isofrequency curve, belonging to f0=4GHz and an external magnetic field of μ0H0=16m T is marked in black. After an increase of the magnetic field to μ0Hrev=350m T the central frequency shifts to frev=18.51GHz, according to the wave-vector conservation. The resulting isofrequency curve is depicted in red. Initial and resulting group velocity are denoted as black and red arrows, respectively. (b) Isofrequency curves for the case of a magnetic-field tilt of 10. The initial isofrequency curve is depicted in black. Marked in blue is the isofrequency curve for the tilted external field. Again, due to wave-vector conservation the central frequency adapts to fc=4.16GHz. The initial and resulting group velocities are denoted as black and blue arrows, respectively.

Conclusion

In summary we propose a method to steer spin-wave packets utilizing dynamic alterations of an external magnetic field. Micromagnetic simulations validate the introduced concept for the propagation control of Backward-Volume wave packets. By choosing the target magnetic field the resulting group velocity of the wave packet can be chosen. It is possible to stop or even reverse the packet propagation. The results of the simulations are in good agreement with the model, especially the wave number remains conserved. The method is expandable to the two-dimensional case, where spin-wave packets can be remotely steered via orientation and strength of the external field. Due to recent advances both in the generation of suitable Backward-Volume packets24,25, and the change of the magnetic field in the timescale of few nanoseconds26, the proposed concept appears feasible although still challenging.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support by the Deutsche-Forschungs-Gemeinschaft (DFG) via Graduiertenkolleg 1286. The authors wish to thank Carina Juretzek and Hoan Vu for fruitful discussion.

Author contributions

The concept was proposed by J.-N.T. and refined by W.H. and J.-N.T. The micromagnetic simulations were performed by J.-N.T. The manuscript was written by both J.-N.T. and W.H.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schneider T, et al. Nondiffractive subwavelength wave beams in a medium with externally controlled anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:197203. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.197203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mansfeld S, et al. Spin wave diffraction and perfect imaging of a grating. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:047204. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.047204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vysotskii SL, Nikitov SA, Filimonov YA. Magnetostatic spin waves in two-dimensional periodic structures (magnetophoton crystals) J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2005;101:547–553. doi: 10.1134/1.2103224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lenk B, Abeling N, Panke J, Münzenberg M. Spin-wave modes and band structure of rectangular CoFeB antidot lattices. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;112:083921. doi: 10.1063/1.4759142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jorzick J, et al. Brillouin light scattering from quantized spin waves in micron-size magnetic wires. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;60:15194–15200. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.15194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giesen F, Podbielski J, Korn T, Grundler D. Multiple ferromagnetic resonance in mesoscopic permalloy rings. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;97:10A712. doi: 10.1063/1.1851932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balhorn F, et al. Spin-wave interference in three-dimensional rolled-up ferromagnetic microtubesuntitled. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:037205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.037205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chumak AV, et al. All-linear time reversal by a dynamic artificial crystal. Nat. Commun. 2010;1:141. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim S-K, et al. Negative refraction of dipole-exchange spin waves through a magnetic twin interface in restricted geometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008;92:212501. doi: 10.1063/1.2936294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davies CS, et al. Towards graded-index magnonics: steering spin waves in magnonic networks. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:020408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020408. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tanabe K, et al. Real-time observation of Snell’s law for spin waves in thin ferromagnetic films. Appl. Phys. Express. 2014;7:053001. doi: 10.7567/APEX.7.053001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Toedt J-N, et al. Interface modes at step edges of media with anisotropic dispersion. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:184416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.184416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Serga, A. A., Andre, A., Demokritov, S. & Hillebrands, B. Stopping of parametrically sustained spin waves in non-stationary bias magnetic field. Jahresbericht TU Kaiserslautern (2004).
  • 14.Bacot V, Labousse M, Eddi A, Fink M, Fort E. Time reversal and holography with spacetime transformations. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:972–977. doi: 10.1038/nphys3810. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Castellanos Muñoz M, et al. Optically induced indirect photonic transitions in a slow light photonic crystal waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;112:053904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.053904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Satoh T, et al. Directional control of spin-wave emission by spatially shaped light. Nat. Photon. 2012;6:662–666. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wessels P, et al. Direct observation of isolated Damon–Eshbach and backward volume spin-wave packets in ferromagnetic microstripes. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22117. doi: 10.1038/srep22117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalinikos BA, Slavin AN. Theory of dipole-exchange spin wave spectrum for ferromagnetic films with mixed exchange boundary conditions. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1986;19:7013. doi: 10.1088/0022-3719/19/35/014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Donahue, M. J. OOMMF user’s guide [microform] / M.J. Donahue, D.G. Porter (U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999).
  • 20.Trudel S, Gaier O, Hamrle J, Hillebrands B. Magnetic anisotropy, exchange and damping in cobalt-based full-Heusler compounds: An experimental review. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2010;43:193001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/19/193001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joseph R, Schlömann E. Demagnetizing field in nonellipsoidal bodies. J. Appl. Phys. 1965;36:1579. doi: 10.1063/1.1703091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kambersky V, Patton CE. Spin-wave relaxation and phenomenological damping in ferromagnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. B. 1975;11:2668–2672. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.2668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stancil DD. Phenomenological propagation loss theory for magnetostatic waves in thin ferrite films. J. Appl. Phys. 1986;59:218. doi: 10.1063/1.336867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heinz B, et al. Propagation of spin-wave packets in individual nanosized yttrium iron garnet magnonic conduits. Nano Lett. 2020;20:4220–4227. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Q, et al. A magnonic directional coupler for integrated magnonic half-adders. Nat. Electron. 2020;3:765–774. doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-00485-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schultheiss, K. et al. Time refraction of spin waves (2020). arXiv:2009.03654. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES