Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 Apr 7;9:e11257. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11257

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., a hump-backed colobodontid (Neopterygii, Actinopterygii) from the early Middle Triassic of Panzhou, Guizhou, China

Xin-Ying Ma 1,2,3,#, Guang-Hui Xu 1,2,✉,#, Bing-He Geng 1,2
Editor: Diogo Provete
PMCID: PMC8035898  PMID: 33868833

Abstract

Neopterygii is a taxonomically diverse clade of ray-finned fishes, including Teleostei, Holostei and closely related fossil taxa. The Colobodontidae is a stem group of large-sized neopterygians with a durophagous feeding adaption from the Middle to Late Triassic marine ecosystems in Europe and South China. Here, we report the discovery of a new colobodontid, Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., based on a well-preserved specimen from the early Middle Triassic (Anisian) of Panzhou (formerly known as Panxian), Guizhou, China. The discovery extends the geographical distribution of Feroxichthys from eastern Yunnan into western Guizhou, and demonstrates a more rapid diversification of early colobodontids than previously thought. The new species possesses diagnostic features of Feroxichthys (e.g., a fused lacrimal-maxilla), but it is easily distinguished from the type species Feroxichthys yunnanensis and other colobodontids by some derived features on the skull and, especially, the relatively short and deep body with a prominent postcranial hump. This body form, previously unknown in colobodontids, implicates a morphological adaptation to structurally complex habitats in light of ecological studies of modern ray-finned fishes with a similar body form. In addition, the feeding apparatus suggests a more obligate durophagous diet for F. panzhouensis sp. nov. than other colobodontids. Results of a cladistic analysis recover the new species as a sister taxon of F. yunnanensis within the Colobodontidae, and suggest that a hump-backed body form has independently evolved multiple times in Triassic neopterygians. As such, the new finding provides an important addition for our understanding of the morphological and ecological diversity of neopterygian fishes from the Triassic marine ecosystems in South China.

Keywords: Osteology, Phylogeny, Colobodontidae, Neopterygii

Introduction

Neopterygii is a taxonomically diverse clade of ray-finned fishes, including Teleostei (e.g., salmons and carps), Holostei (e.g., gars and bownfin), and closely related fossil taxa (Regan, 1923; Brough, 1931, 1939; Lehman, 1952; Schaeffer, 1956; Patterson, 1973, 1982; Gardiner, Maisey & Littlewood, 1996; Grande & Bemis, 1998; Coates, 1999; Arratia, 1999, 2013, 2015; Cavin, 2010; Grande, 2010; Sallan, 2014; Friedman, 2015; Xu & Zhao, 2016; Xu, 2019, 2021). This clade underwent a rapid radiation in the aftermath of the end-Permian extinction (Chen & Benton, 2012; Benton et al., 2013; Romano et al., 2016; Clarke & Friedman, 2018; López-Arbarello & Sferco, 2018; Romano, 2021). The Colobodontidae is a stem group of neopterygian fishes in the Middle to Late Triassic marine ecosystems (Stensiö, 1921; Bürgin, 1996; Mutter, 2002, 2004; Sun et al., 2008; Cartanyà et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Xu, 2020a). Members of this family are generally durophagous predators with a large body size (up to 650 mm in total length; Cartanyà et al., 2015), and consequently are important for understanding the trophic structure of Triassic marine ecosystems. Mutter (2002, 2004) restricted the family to include two genera Colobodus and Crenilepis; the former includes at least five species from the Middle to Late Triassic in Europe and South China, and the latter the type species Crenilepis sandbergeri from the Middle Triassic of Germany, Italy and Switzerland in Europe (Mutter, 2002; Sun et al., 2008; Cartanyà et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019). In addition, two new colobodontid taxa were proposed by Mutter (2002) in his doctoral dissertation but both have not been formally published yet. Recently, Xu (2020a) named a new colobodontid, Feroxichthys yunnanensis from the early Middle Triassic (Pelsonian, Anisian, ~244.2 Ma) of Luoping, Yunnan, China, which represents the earliest known member of this family (Zhang et al., 2009, 2015).

Here, we report the discovery of a new colobodontid fish on the basis of a large specimen collected in around 2005 by our colleague (Prof. F. Jin, retired last year) from Xinmin, Panzhou (formerly known as Panxian), Guizhou Province (Fig. 1). The specimen was embedded in gray muddy limestone from the upper part of the Second (Upper) Member of the Guanling Formation. Although some bones in the skull roof are missing, it is generally well-preserved, with a durophagous adaptation in feeding apparatus similar to other colobodontids. The new fish has a lacrimal fused with the maxilla, diagnostic of Feroxichthys (Xu, 2020a), but it bears a relatively short and deep body with a hump-backed postcranium, a feature previously unknown from the type species of Feroxichthys or other colobodontids. In the Middle Triassic, stem neopterygians with a similar or even deeper body form were previously known only by ‘perleidids’ or polzbergiids from the western Paleotethys Ocean in Europe (Tintori, 1990; Bürgin, 1992; Lombardo & Tintori, 2004). The new species of Feroxichthys presented in this contribution represents the first evidence of hump-backed stem neopterygian fishes from the eastern Paleotethys Ocean in Asia.

Figure 1. Fossil locality.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Map showing the fossil locality of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov.

Along with the new species of Feroxichthys, other taxa from the same fossiliferous level in Panxian localities include invertebrates, marine reptiles, the colobodontid Colobodus baii (Sun et al., 2008), saurichthyiforms (Wu et al., 2011, 2013, 2015), holosteans (Chen et al., 2014; Xu & Shen, 2015) and birgeriiforms (Jiang et al., 2016). The whole fossil assemblage has been referred to the Panxian Fauna or Biota (Motani et al., 2008; Benton et al., 2013). Geological survey indicates that the Panxian Biota is slightly younger than the Luoping Biota because the former is recovered from the upper part of the Second Member of the Guanling Formation and the latter the middle part of this member of strata (Benton et al., 2013), although conodont analyses constrained both biotas within the same Nicoraella kockeli Zone (Sun et al., 2006, 2016; Zhang et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2011). The zircon dating provided an absolute age of 244.0 ± 1.3 Ma for the Panxian Biota (Wang et al., 2014).

Materials and Methods

The specimen is curated at the fossil collections of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China. It was mechanically prepared with sharp steel needles and, for better contrast, was dusted with ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) before being photographed. The relative position of fins and scale counts were expressed following Westoll (1944). For ease of comparison with most existing literature, the traditional actinopterygian nomenclatures (e.g., Gardiner & Schaeffer, 1989; Bürgin, 1992; Grande & Bemis, 1998) are generally followed. However, the segmented and unbranched rays anterior to the principal rays of the fins are termed as procurrent rays rather than rudimentary rays, following Arratia (2008, 2009).

To illuminate the affinities of the new taxon, we incorporate it in a phylogenetic analysis based on the data matrix of Xu (2020a). The current data matrix includes 130 morphological characters and 56 actinopterygian taxa (see Supplemental Material). All characters were unordered and equally weighted. The basal actinopterygian Moythomasia durgaringa (Gardiner, 1984) was selected as the out-group taxon. The data matrix was generated by WinClada 1.00.08 (Nixon, 2002). Tree searches were accomplished with the heuristic search algorithm (gaps treated as missing data; 1,000 random addition sequence replicates; tree bisection-reconnection branch-swapping, with five trees held at each step and multiple trees saved) in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2003).

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank Life Science Identifiers can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 03FCC5B3-E3E3-47B5-A0CE-7367BD37E64D. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.

Results

Systematic paleontology

Actinopterygii Cope, 1887

Neopterygii Regan, 1923

Colobodontidae Andersson, 1916

Feroxichthys Xu, 2020a

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov.

LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9D5DC42C-C6D1-4F14-817E-A54C4F43E78A

(Figures 2–3, 4A and 5–8)

Figure 2. Entire specimen of the holotype.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Entire specimen of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., IVPP V16520 (holotype). (A) Original specimen. (B) Specimen dusted with ammonium chloride.

Figure 3. Skull and pectoral girdle of the holotype.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Skull and pectoral girdle of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., IVPP V16520 (holotype). (A) Photograph. (B) Line-drawing.

Figure 4. Reconstruction of skull and pectoral girdle.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Reconstructions of skulls and pectoral girdles of two species of Feroxichthys. (A) Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov.; the unlabeled bones are not preserved but tentatively recovered from the body plan of F. yunnanensis. (B) Feroxichthys yunnanensis.

Figure 5. Fins.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Fins of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., IVPP V16520 (holotype). (A) Right pectoral fin, (B) dorsal fin, (C) right pelvic fin and (D) anal fin.

Figure 8. Life reconstruction.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Life reconstruction of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. (by Y. Xu and G.-H. Xu).

Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from Panzhou, Guizhou Province, where the specimen was collected.

Holotype. IVPP V16520, a laterally compressed specimen with the skull roofing bones missing.

Locality and horizon: Xinmin, Panzhou, Guizhou; Second (Upper) Member of Guanling Formation, Pelsonian (244.0 ± 1.3 Ma; Wang et al., 2014), Anisian, Middle Triassic.

Diagnosis: A new species of Feroxichthys distinguished from the type species of the genus by the following features (autapomorphies, those unique among colobodontids, identified with an asterisk): relatively deep body with prominent postcranial hump (*); presence of nine supraorbitals (*); infraorbital portion of lacrimo-maxilla deeper than orbital radius (*); anterodorsal process of subopercle 38% of opercle in depth; opercle 1.6 times deeper than subopercle (excluding anterodorsal process); five long and strong, pencil-like teeth followed by four short and molariform teeth in anterior half of maxilla (*); five pencil-like teeth in dentary, slightly longer than those in maxilla (*); seven segmented procurrent rays in dorsal lobe of caudal fin; ornamentation of ridges and tubercles on anterior flank scales; and pterygial formula of D55/P25, A46, C77/T82 (*).

Description

General morphology and size. Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. has a relatively deep body with a prominent postcranial hump and an abbreviated heterocercal caudal fin. The dorsal fin originates approximately midway between the origins of the pelvic and anal fins. The holotype (Fig. 2), the only known specimen, has a standard length of ~220 mm, a total length of ~260 mm, and a greatest body depth of 85 mm. The skull, strongly ornamented with dense ganoid tubercles and some striae (Fig. 3), has a length of 57 mm. The body is fully covered with rhombic scales, and because of this, the vertebral column and pterygiophores are not exposed (Fig. 4).

Snout and skull roof. The dermal bones in the snout region and skull roof are missing. They are tentatively reconstructed following the pattern of the type species of Feroxichthys (Fig. 4B).

Circumorbital bones. Eight trapezoidal or pentagonal supraorbitals are preserved in the holotype. In addition, there is a vacancy between the first (anteriormost) and other supraorbitals, which might represent a missing supraorbital. Thus, nine supraorbitals are recovered in this taxon (Fig. 4A). Among them, the first supraorbital is largest, being about half of the orbital length; the middle six are small, arranged in two or three lines; and the last two are relatively large, one-third as long as the first one.

The lacrimal has been fused with the infraorbital ramus of the maxilla, showing a characteristic feature of Feroxichthys among colobodontids. The infraorbital portion of the lacrimo-maxilla is significantly deeper than the orbital radius. The infraorbital sensory canal enclosed in the lacrimo-maxilla is curved; the anterior half of the canal is parallel to the oral margin of the maxilla, and the posterior half extends posterodorsally and enters the jugal from its anteroventral tip (Fig. 3).

The jugal is located at the posteroventral corner of the orbit. It is nearly L-shaped, having a nearly vertical dorsal arm and an anteriorly extended ventral ramus (Fig. 3). The infraorbital sensory canal traverses the jugal curvedly and passes onto the dermosphenotic dorsally.

The dermosphenotic is relatively narrow, twice as deep as the last supraorbital bone, with a slightly concave anterior margin and convex dorsal, ventral and posterior margins (Fig. 3). The dorsal half of the dermosphenotic anteriorly contacts the last supraorbital, and its ventral half forms the orbital margin. Posteriorly, the dermosphenotic contacts the preopercle directly, and a suborbital is evidently absent, as in other colobodontids.

Jaws. The premaxilla remains unknown because of incomplete preservation. As described above, the infraorbital ramus of the maxilla has fused with the lacrimal. The maxilla has a triangular posterior blade, which contacts the preopercle with a nearly straight posterodorsal margin (Fig. 3). The ventral (oral) margin of the maxilla is convex. The maximum depth of the posterior blade is as deep as the orbital length. Teeth are present only in its anterior half length of the oral margin, including five long and strong, pencil-like biting teeth followed by four stout crushing teeth. The first (anterior-most) tooth is the longest, and others gradually reduce in length posteriorly.

The lower jaw is robust and relatively deep, with two elements (dentary and angular) discernable in lateral view (Fig. 3). The supra-angular is unknown because of the lateral coverage of the maxilla. The dentary is the largest element of the lower jaw, having a nearly straight oral margin. The anterior and ventral parts of the dentary are ornamented with dense tubercles and its posterodorsal part is smooth. A row of five strong teeth is present in the oral margin of the dentary. They are pencil-like and slightly protruding, and their lengths are somewhat longer mor than those of anterior biting teeth in the maxilla. The distal ends of the teeth are blunt or slightly pointed rather than sharply pointed. The angular is small and roughly rhomboid in lateral view, contacting the dentary anteriorly. The mandibular sensory canal runs parallel to ventral margins of the angular and posterior portion of the dentary, and arches dorsally in the anterior portion of the latter bone.

An elongate coronoid and a plate-like prearticular are discernable near the oral margin of the dentary, and their oral margins are covered by rounded, molariform teeth with a prominent, wart-like knob on the tip (Fig. 3).

Opercular series and dermohyal. The preopercle is deep and vertically oriented (Fig. 3). It has a roughly trapezoidal dorsal part and a triangular ventral part that tapers ventrally. A vertical line of small pores near the posterior margin of the preopercle indicates the sensory canal in this bone.

The opercle is large and trapezoidal, having a depth/length ratio of 1.8. It has a slightly concave anterior margin and convex dorsal, ventral and posterior margins. The subopercle is sickle-shaped, bearing a deep anterodorsal process (Fig. 3). The process is 39% of the depth of the opercle. Excluding this process, the subopercle is 54% of the depth of the latter bone. In addition, a small triangular dermohyal is wedged between the preopercle and opercle.

Branchiostegal rays, gulars and ceratohyals. There are seven branchiostegal rays in right side of the skull (Fig. 3). They are relatively short and plate-like, tapering anteriorly. A relatively broad but shorter bone partly overlapping the branchiostegal rays is interpreted as a lateral gular because of its size and shape. The median gular, commonly present in other stem neopterygians, remains unknown because of incomplete preservation. The ceratohyals are partly exposed between the branchiostegal rays and lower jaw, including an elongate anterior ceratohyal and a subcircular posterior ceratohyal. No other bones of the hyoid arch are exposed.

Paired girdles and fins. Only the right supracleithrum is discernable in the pectoral girdle. It is relatively narrow and slightly anteriorly inclined, nearly as deep as the opercle.

The pectoral fins insert low on the body; 10 distally segmented and branched rays are discernable in the right pectoral fin (Fig. 6A). The first ray is the thickest and its proximal region is preceded by a basal fulcrum that is ornamented with elongate tubercles. The length of the basal fulcrum is about one-third of the length of the first ray. The second ray is longest, and others gradually reduce posteriorly in length. A series of leaf-like fringing fulcra is associated with the first ray, and their size gradually reduces posteriorly.

Figure 6. Caudal fin.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Caudal fin of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., IVPP V16520 (holotype). (A) Photograph. (B) Line-drawing.

The pelvic girdles are not exposed. The pelvic fins insert at the 25th vertical scale row, each composed of ten distally segmented rays (Fig. 6C). The first ray is unbranched, preceded by two basal fulcra and a series of fringing fulcra; the remaining rays are branched distally.

Median fins. The dorsal fin originates above the 55th vertical scale row. Only anterior two rays are partly preserved in their proximal regions, preceded by a short basal fulcrum and several small fringing fulcra (Fig. 6B).

The anal fin originates below the 46th vertical scale row. It is composed of two procurrent rays and 11 principal rays (Fig. 6D). All rays are distally segmented; the anterior three rays are unbranched, and others branched distally. The first procurrent ray is no more than half of the length of the second one, preceded by a short basal fulcrum. A series of small fringing fulcra is associated with the leading margins of both procurrent rays. Notably, the distal segment of the first procurrent ray inserts between two fringing fulcra and resembles these fulcra in shape, showing a condition similar to that in Colobodus baii (Sun et al., 2008).

The caudal fin is abbreviated heterocercal with a forked profile (Fig. 7). It is composed of 25 principal rays, 12 in the dorsal lobe. Except two marginal principal rays, the middle rays are branched distally. Additionally, there are seven procurrent rays and six epaxial basal fulcra in the dorsal lobe, and four procurrent rays and two hypaxial basal fulcra in the ventral lobe. Rounded or elongated tubercles are discernable on the surfaces of some rays. Small, leaf-like fringing fulcra are associated with the leading margins of four procurrent rays (from the third to sixth) in the dorsal lobe and those of three procurrent rays (from the first to third) in the ventral lobe. The distal segments of these procurrent rays are similar to the fringing fulcra in shape, resembling the conditions in other colobodontids (Sun et al., 2008; Xu, 2020a).

Figure 7. Scales.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Scales of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., IVPP V16520 (holotype). (A) Scales in predorsal region with arrows showing peg-socket articulations between scales. (B) Scales around the lateral line in middle flank region with arrows showing openings of pit organs.

Scales. The scales are rhomboid and presumedly ganoid with serrated posterior margins. They are arranged in 82 vertical rows between the pectoral girdle and the caudal inversion. In the 40th vertical row of scales, 18 and 19 scales are present above and below the lateral line on each side of the body, respectively. The scales are the largest in the anteroventral flank region with a depth/width ratio of 1.6, and they gradually become shorter dorsally, ventrally and posteriorly. The scales in the anterodorsal region of the body are ornamented with drop-like tubercles and parallel ridges or striae (Fig. 8A) and those in posterior regions are largely smooth except for some ridges extending anteriorly for a short length from the serrations at the posterior margin of the scale. The openings of lateral line system include vertical slits (openings of pit organs) in some lateral line scales (Fig. 8B); the slit is about 40% of the scale in depth. Peg-socket articulations are discernable from some scales in the anterodorsal flank region (Fig. 8A), as common for other early actinopterygians.

Discussion

Phylogenetic affinities and comparisons

The phylogenetic analysis resulted in 360 most parsimonious trees (length = 350 steps, consistency index = 0.4514, and retention index = 0.7725). The strict consensus tree (Fig. 9) is similar to that proposed by Xu (2020a), and F. panzhouensis sp. nov. is consistently recovered as a sister taxon to F. yunnanensis within the Colobodontidae. The nodes relevant to the studied new taxon are discussed below.

Figure 9. Strict consensus of most parsimonious trees.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Strict consensus of 360 most parsimonious trees (tree length = 350 steps, consistency index = 0.4514, retention index = 0.7725), illustrating the phylogenetic position of Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. within the Neopterygii. Noticing that hump-backed body forms have independently evolved in polzbergiiform, colobodontid, pseudobeaconiid and kyphosichthyid neopterygians (marked with stars). Numbers above nodes indicate Bremer decay indices. For character descriptions and data matrix, see the online Supplemental Material.

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. is retrieved as a colobodontid because it possesses four synapomorphies of this family: presence of a deep anterodorsal process of the subopercle (independently evolved in holosteans); presence of multiple supraorbitals arranged in more than one horizontal rows (independently evolved in and Caturus; reversal in Colobodus bassanii); absence of suborbitals (independently evolved in platysiagiforms, Pseudobeaconia, Habroichthys and some crown neopterygians), and presence of ornamentation of round or elongated ganoid tubercles on caudal fin rays.

As in other colobodontids, F. panzhouensis sp. nov. lacks the derived features of Teffichthys-like taxa, Perleidus altolepis and more derived neopterygians: absence of the dermosphenotic/preopercle contact, presence of the opercle no larger than the subopercle (reversal in Peltopleuriformes and more derived neopterygians), no more than six pairs of branchiostegal rays (reversal in some crown neopterygians), and no more than 24 principal rays in the caudal fin (reversal in fuyuanperleidids and some louwoichthyids; Xu, 2021).

Within the Colobodontidae, the sister taxon relationships between F. panzhouensis sp. nov. and F. yunnanensis are supported by presence of a fused lacrimal-maxilla (independently evolved in luganoiiforms); distribution of teeth only in anterior half length of the maxilla (independently evolved in louwoichthyiforms and several other clades of early neopterygians); and presence of seven to nine pairs of branchiostegal rays (independently evolved in pholidopleuriforms and platysiagiforms). The genus Feroxichthys lacks the derived feature of other members (Colobodus and Crenilepis) of this family: presence of a postrostral (unknown in F. panzhouensis sp. nov. because of incomplete preservation; independently evolved in Pseudobeaconia; López-Arbarello & Zavattieri, 2008).

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. is distinguished from other colobodontids by the following features (autapomorphies):

  1. A prominent postcranial hump. Feroxichtys panzhouensis sp. nov. is unique among colobodontids in having a relatively deep and short body with a postcranial hump. By contrast, F. yunnanensis and other colobodontids generally have an elongated fusiform body.

  2. Nine supraorbitals. Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. has a larger number (nine) of supraorbitals than F. yunnanensis (six) and many other colobodontids (three to five). Ten or more supraorbitals are known only in Crenilepis among colobodontids (Mutter, 2002).

  3. Deeper infraorbital portion of lacrimo-maxilla. As described above, the infraorbital portion of the lacrimo-maxilla of F. panzhouensis sp. nov. is notably deeper than that of F. yunnanensis. Other colobodontids generally have a maxilla separated from the lacrimal. Outsides of colobodontids, a fused lacrimo-maxilla has independently evolved in luganoiiforms among early neopterygians (Bürgin, 1992; Xu, 2020a, 2020b).

  4. Stronger but fewer teeth in dentary. The dentary of F. panzhouensis sp. nov. bear only five large teeth, showing the least number of teeth in this bone among colobodontids. These teeth are strong and pencil-like, enabling a powerful biting and a firmer grip in the prey capture. Similar teeth are otherwise present in Ctenognatichys belotti from the Middle Triassic of Switzerland and Italy (Bürgin, 1992; Bürgin & Herzog, 2002). By contrast, the teeth in the dentary are relatively slender, pointed and numerous in other colobodontids.

  5. Short and stout crushing teeth in maxilla. Besides five long and pencil-like biting teeth, the maxilla of F. panzhouensis sp. nov. bear four short and stout crushing teeth. No other colobodontids have crushing teeth in the maxilla.

  6. Larger number of procurrent rays in dorsal lobe of caudal fin. F. panzhouensis sp. nov. has seven segmented procurrent rays in the dorsal lobe of the caudal fin. This number is slightly less than that in Crenilepis and Colobodus baii (about eight) but is larger than those in C. giganteus and C. bassanii (two or three) and F. yunnanensis (four). Four or more epaxial procurrent rays are also present in the pholidopleuriforms, many redfieldiiforms, perleidids, derived louwoichthyids, luganoiiforms and most peltopleuriforms, but they are much reduced or lost in other early neopterygians (Lehman, 1952; Hutchinson, 1973; Griffith, 1977; Lombardo et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011; Geng et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2012; Xu, Gao & Coates, 2015; Xu, Zhao & Shen, 2015; Xu, Ma & Zhao, 2018; Marramà et al., 2017; Wen et al., 2019).

Implications

The new discovery extends the geographical distribution of the Ansian Feroxichthys from eastern Yunnan to western Guizhou, demonstrating a wider distribution for this genus. Previously, the earliest colobodontids were represented by Colobodus baii from the Panxian Biota (Sun et al., 2008) and F. yunnanensis from the Luoping Biota (Xu, 2020a) in South China. Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. documents the second colobodontid from the Panxian Biota, which is about two million years older than the European relatives near the Anisian/Ladinian boundary (~242 Ma) of the Besano Formation exposed in the Monte San Giorgio area in Europe (Bürgin, 1996; Mutter, 2002). The successive discoveries of two colobodontids in Yunnan and Guizhou indicate that the early diversification of this clade is more rapid than previously thought.

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov. represents the first colobodontid with a prominent postcranial hump. Modern ray-finned fishes with a similar body form (e.g., boarfish Paristiopterus) are commonly seen in structurally complex habitats, e.g., thick macrophyte beds, rocky areas or coral reefs; this body form provides an advantage for the overall force balance during swimming (Drucker & Lauder, 2002; Standen & Lauder, 2005; Helfman et al., 2009). In the Middle Triassic, a similar or even deeper body form were previously known by several polzbergiids and pseudobeaconiids in Europe (Tintori, 1990; Bürgin, 1992; Lombardo & Tintori, 2004; Lombardo, Rusconi & Tintori, 2008; Xu, 2021) and kyphosichthyid ginglymoidans in Asia (Xu & Wu, 2012; Xu, Ma & Zhao, 2018). As revealed by our analysis above, the colobodontid Feroxichthys is not closely related to these clades (Fig. 9), and this implicates that a hump-backed body form has independently evolved multiple times in Triassic neopterygians.

The feeding apparatus suggests a more obligate durophagous diet for F. panzhouensis sp. nov. than other colobodontids. It is generally accepted that colobodontids evolved a durophagous diet with dentition combining grasping and crushing morphologies. Similar dentition is present in living durophagous fishes (e.g., the cichlid Astatoreochromis alluaudi; Helfman et al., 2009), which employ anterior peg-like or conical teeth for initial prey capture and flatted or rounded molariform teeth for some sort of crushing in the oral cavity. Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov., similar to other colobodontids, have molariform teeth on the coronoids, prearticular and pterygoids. Moreover, it has blunted, crushing teeth on the maxilla. These teeth could be important in the initial crushing on the hard-shelled during the prey capture. In addition, F. panzhouensis sp. nov. probably has a slower swimming ability than other colobodontids because its hump-backed body form causes larger drags during swimming. Accordingly, its prey is likely slow-moving. The potential invertebrate prey of F. panzhouensis sp. nov. would be gastropods, brachiopods and bivalves in the same ecosystems.

Conclusion

Our study of a large well-preserved specimen from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) Panxian Biota recovers the first colobodontid fish with a prominent postcranial hump. The new colobodontid possesses diagnostic features of Feroxichthys but is easily distinguished from other members of this family by some autapomorphies on skull and body form. Results of a phylogenetic analysis recovers it as a sister taxon of F. yunnanensis and provides insights into the interrelationships of early neopterygians. The teeth of F. panzhouensis sp. nov. are well adapted for a durophagous diet, and its potential prey would be mainly hard-shelled, slow-moving invertebrates, e.g., gastropods, brachiopods and bivalves. The discovery provides an important addition to our understanding of the early diversification of colobodontids, and more generally, the morphological and ecological diversity of early neopterygians from the early Middle Triassic marine ecosystems in South China.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Anatomical character list, data matrix, and the strict consensus tree showing all character optimizations.
Click here for additional data file. (764.3KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11257/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Data matrix.
Click here for additional data file. (8.7KB, nex)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11257/supp-2

Acknowledgments

We thank Fan Jin for the collection of the specimen described herein, the editor Diogo Provete and three reviewers Gloria Arratia, Paulo Brito and Toni Bürgin for helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript, and Martha Richter and Heinz Furrer for granting access to comparative fossil materials in the Natural History Museum (London) and Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Uinversität Zürich (Zürich), respectively.

Anatomical Abbreviations

adp

anterodorsal process of subopercle

an

anterior nostril

ang

angular bone

ao

antorbital bone

apl

anterior pit-line

bf

basal fulcrum

br

branchiostegal rays

cha

anterior ceratohyal

chp

posterior ceratohyal

cl

cleithrum

co

coronoid

den

dentary

dh

dermohyal

dsp

dermosphenotic

exsc

extrascapular bone

ff

fringing fulcrum

fr

frontal bone

la-mx

lacrimo-maxilla

lg

lateral gular

ju

jugal

mg

median gular bone

mpl

middle pit-line

na

nasal bone

op

opercle

pa-dpt

parieto-dermopterotic

par

prearticular bone

pcl

postcleithrum

pmx

premaxilla

pn

posterior nostril

pop

preopercle

ppl

posterior pit-line

ppr

procurrent ray

pr

principal ray

pscl

presupracleithrum

pt

posttemporal

r

rostral bone

sc

scale

scl

supracleithrum

sop

subopercle

su

supraorbital bone

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grants XDB 26000000 and 18000000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grants 41672001 and 41688103) and Key research program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant QYZDB-SSW-DQC040). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xin-Ying Ma performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Guang-Hui Xu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Bing-He Geng conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The online Supplemental Material are available in the Supplemental Files at PeerJ, including the anatomical character list, data matrix, and the strict consensus tree showing all character optimizations.

The specimen (IVPP V16520) illustrated and described is stored at the fossil collections of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China.

New Species Registration

The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described species:

Publication LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03FCC5B3-E3E3-47B5-A0CE-7367BD37E64D

Feroxichthys panzhouensis sp. nov LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9D5DC42C-C6D1-4F14-817E-A54C4F43E78A

References

  • Andersson (1916).Andersson E. Über einige Trias-Fische aus der Cava Trefontane. Tessin Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala. 1916;15:13–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Arratia (1999).Arratia G. The monophyly of Teleostei and stem-group teleosts: consensus and disagreements. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 2—Systematics and Fossil Record. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 1999. pp. 265–334. [Google Scholar]
  • Arratia (2008).Arratia G. Actinopterygian postcranial skeleton with special reference to the diversity of fin ray elements, and the problem of identifying homologies. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 4—Homology and Phylogeny. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 2008. pp. 40–101. [Google Scholar]
  • Arratia (2009).Arratia G. Identifying patterns of diversity of the actinopterygian fulcra. Acta Zoologica. 2009;90(Suppl. 1):220–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00375.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Arratia (2013).Arratia G. Morphology, taxonomy, and phylogeny of Triassic pholidophorid fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2013;33(Suppl. 6):1–138. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2013.835642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Arratia (2015).Arratia G. Complexities of early Teleostei and the evolution of particular morphological structures through time. Copeia. 2015;103(4):999–1025. doi: 10.1643/CG-14-184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Benton et al. (2013).Benton MJ, Zhang Q-Y, Hu S-X, Chen Z-Q, Zhou C-Y, Wen W, Liu J, Huang J-Y, Zhou C-Y, Xie T, Tong J-N, Choo B. Exceptional vertebrate biotas from the Triassic of China, and the expansion of marine ecosystems after the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Earth-Science Reviews. 2013;125(5):199–243. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Brough (1931).Brough J. The Triassic fishes of the Karroo system and some general considerations on the bony fishes of the Triassic period. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London; 1931. pp. 235–296. [Google Scholar]
  • Brough (1939).Brough J. The Triassic fishes of Besano, Lombardy. London: British Museum (Natural History); 1939. [Google Scholar]
  • Bürgin (1992).Bürgin T. Basal ray-finned fishes (Osteichthyes; Actinopterygii) from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Canton Tessin, Switzerland) Schweizerische Palaontologische Abhandlungen. 1992;114:1–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Bürgin (1996).Bürgin T. Diversity in the feeding apparatus of perleidid fishes (Actinopterygii) from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland) in. In: Arratia G, Viohl G, editors. Mesozoic Fishes and Paleoecology. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 1996. pp. 555–565. [Google Scholar]
  • Bürgin & Herzog (2002).Bürgin T, Herzog A. Die Gattung Ctenognathichthys (Actinopterygii, Perleidformes) aus der Prosanto-Formation (Ladin, Mitteltrias) Graubündens (Schweiz), mit der Beschreibung einer neuen Art C. hattichi sp. nov. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae. 2002;95:461–469. [Google Scholar]
  • Cartanyà et al. (2015).Cartanyà J, Fortuny J, Bolet A, Mutter RJ. Colobodus giganteus (Beltan, 1972) comb. nov. from the Upper Muschelkalk facies of Catalonia (NE Iberian Peninsula) Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 2015;278(3):323–333. doi: 10.1127/njgpa/2015/0532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavin (2010).Cavin L. Diversity of Mesozoic semionotiform fishes and the origin of gars (Lepisosteidae) Naturwissenschaften. 2010;97(12):1035–1040. doi: 10.1007/s00114-010-0722-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen & Benton (2012).Chen ZQ, Benton MJ. The timing and pattern of biotic recovery following the end-Permian mass extinction. Nature Geoscience. 2012;5(6):375–383. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2014).Chen W-Q, Sun Z-Y, Tintori A, Jiang D-Y. A new species of Sangiorgioichthys Tintori & Lombardo, 2007 (Actinopterygii; Semionotiformes) from the Pelsonian (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of Guizhou Province, South China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 2014;273(1):65–74. doi: 10.1127/0077-7749/2014/0416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke & Friedman (2018).Clarke JT, Friedman M. Body-shape diversity in Triassic-Early Cretaceous neopterygian fishes: sustained holostean disparity and predominantly gradual increases in teleost phenotypic variety. Paleobiology. 2018;44(3):402–433. doi: 10.1017/pab.2018.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Coates (1999).Coates MI. Endocranial preservation of a Carboniferous actinopterygian from Lancashire, UK, and the interrelationships of primitive actinopterygians. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 1999;354(1382):435–462. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cope (1887).Cope ED. Zittel’s manual of palaeontology. American Naturalist. 1887;21:1014–1019. [Google Scholar]
  • Drucker & Lauder (2002).Drucker EG, Lauder GV. Wake dynamics and locomotor function in fishes: interpreting evolutionary patterns in pectoral fin design. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2002;42(5):997–1008. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.5.997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Friedman (2015).Friedman M. The early evolution of ray-finned fishes. Palaeontology. 2015;58(2):213–228. doi: 10.1111/pala.12150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gardiner (1984).Gardiner BG. The relationships of the palaeoniscid fishes, a review based on new specimens of Mimia and Moythomasia from the Upper Devonian of Western Australia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology. 1984;37:173–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Gardiner, Maisey & Littlewood (1996).Gardiner BG, Maisey JG, Littlewood DTJ. Interrelationships of basal neopterygians. In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. Interrelationships of Fishes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. pp. 117–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Gardiner & Schaeffer (1989).Gardiner BG, Schaeffer B. Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1989;97(2):135–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb00550.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Geng et al. (2012).Geng B-H, Jin F, Wu F-X, Wang Q. New perleidid fishes from the Middle Triassic strata of Yunnan Province. Geological Bulletin of China. 2012;31:915–927. [Google Scholar]
  • Grande (2010).Grande L. An empirical synthetic pattern study of gars (Lepisosteiformes) and closely related species, based mostly on skeletal anatomy: the resurrection of Holostei. Copeia. 2010;10:1–871. [Google Scholar]
  • Grande & Bemis (1998).Grande L, Bemis WE. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy: an empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 1998;18(Suppl. 1):1–690. doi: 10.1080/02724634.1998.10011114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffith (1977).Griffith J. The Upper Triassic fishes from Polzberg bei Lunz, Austria. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1977;60(1):1–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1977.tb00834.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Helfman et al. (2009).Helfman G, Collette BB, Facey DE, Bowen BW. The diversity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. Second Edition. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Hu et al. (2011).Hu S-X, Zhang Q-Y, Chen Z-Q, Zhou C-Y, Lü T, Xie T, Wen W. The Luoping biota: exceptional preservation, and new evidence on the Triassic recovery from end-Permian mass extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;278(1716):2274–2282. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson (1973).Hutchinson P. A revision of the redfieldiiform and perleidiform fishes from the Triassic of Bekker’s Kraal (South Africa) and Brookvale (New South Wales) Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History. 1973;22:235–354. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang et al. (2016).Jiang L, Ni P-G, Sun Z-Y, Jiang D-Y. Discovery and its significance of Birgeria sp. from the Middle Triassic Panxian Fauna, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 2016;52:437–443. [Google Scholar]
  • Lehman (1952).Lehman JP. Étude complémentaire des poissions de l’Eotrias de Madagascar. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Hangdlingar. 1952;2:1–201. [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2019).Li J, Luo Y-M, Wang Y, Xu G-F, Ma Z-H. A new discovery of Colobodus Agassiz, 1844 (Colobodontidae) from the Carnian (Upper Triassic) of Guizhou, South China. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2019;93(6):1967–1968. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.13832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2011).Lin H-Q, Sun Z-Y, Tintori A, Lombardo C, Jiang D-Y, Hao W-C. A new species of Habroichthys Brough, 1939 (Actinopterygii; Peltopleuriformes) from the Pelsonian (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of Yunnan Province, South China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 2011;262(1):79–89. doi: 10.1127/0077-7749/2011/0186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo, Rusconi & Tintori (2008).Lombardo C, Rusconi M, Tintori A. New perleidiform from the Lower Ladinian (Middle Triassic) of the northern grigna (LC) Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia. 2008;114:263–272. [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo et al. (2011).Lombardo C, Sun Z-Y, Tintori A, Jiang D-Y, Hao W-C. A new species of the genus Perleidus (Actinopterygii: Perleidiformes) from the Middle Triassic of southern China. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana. 2011;50:75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Lombardo & Tintori (2004).Lombardo C, Tintori A. New perleidiforms from the Triassic of the southern Alps and the revision of Serroleis from the Triassic of Württenberg (Germany) In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 3: Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 2004. pp. 179–196. [Google Scholar]
  • López-Arbarello & Sferco (2018).López-Arbarello A, Sferco E. Neopterygian phylogeny: the merger assay. Royal Society Open Science. 2018;5(3):172337. doi: 10.1098/rsos.172337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • López-Arbarello & Zavattieri (2008).López-Arbarello A, Zavattieri AM. Systematic revision of Pseudobeaconia Bordas, 1944, and Mendocinichthys Whitley, 1953 (Actinopterygii: ‘Perleidiformes’) from the Triassic of Argentina. Palaeontology. 2008;51(5):1025–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00806.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Marramà et al. (2017).Marramà G, Lombardo C, Tintori A, Carnevale G. Redescription of ‘Perleidus’ (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Early Triassic of northwestern Madagascar. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia. 2017;123:219–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Motani et al. (2008).Motani R, Jiang D-Y, Tintori A, Sun Y-L, Hao W-C, Boyd A, Hinic-Frlog S, Schmitz L, Shin J-Y, Sun Z-Y. Horizons and assemblages of Middle Triassic marine reptiles from Panxian, Guizhou, China. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2008;28(3):900–903. doi: 10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[900:HAAOMT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mutter (2002).Mutter RJ. Revision of the Triassic family Colobodontidae sensu Andersson, 1916 (emended) whith a tentative assessment of perleidiform interrelationships (Actinopterygii: Perleidiformes) 2002. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Mutter (2004).Mutter RI. The perleidiform family colobodontidae: a review. In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 3—Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil; 2004. pp. 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Nixon (2002).Nixon KC. WinClada. version 1.00.08http://www.cladistics.com 2002
  • Patterson (1973).Patterson C. Interrelationships of holosteans. In: Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson C, editors. Interrelationships of Fishes. London: Academic Press; 1973. pp. 233–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson (1982).Patterson C. Morphology and interrelationships of primitive actinopterygian fishes. American Zoologist. 1982;22(2):241–259. doi: 10.1093/icb/22.2.241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Regan (1923).Regan CT. The skeleton of Lepidosteus, with remarks on the origin and evolution of the lower neopterygian fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London; 1923. pp. 445–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Romano (2021).Romano C. A hiatus obscures the early evolution of modern lineages of bony fishes. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2021;8:618853. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.618853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Romano et al. (2016).Romano C, Koot MB, Kogan I, Brayard A, Minikh AV, Brinkmann W, Bucher H, Kriwet J. Permian-Triassic Osteichthyes (bony fishes): diversity dynamics and body size evolution. Biological Reviews. 2016;91(1):106–147. doi: 10.1111/brv.12161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sallan (2014).Sallan LC. Major issues in the origins of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) biodiversity. Biological Reviews. 2014;89(4):950–971. doi: 10.1111/brv.12086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaeffer (1956).Schaeffer B. Evolution in the Subholostean fishes. Evolution. 1956;10(2):201–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1956.tb02845.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Standen & Lauder (2005).Standen EM, Lauder GV. Dorsal and anal fin function in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus: three-dimensional kinematics during propulsion and maneuvering. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2005;208(14):2753–2763. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stensiö (1921).Stensiö EA. Triassic fishes from Spitzbergen: II. Kungliga Svenska Vetenska Vetenskapskademiens Handingar. 1921;3:1–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2016).Sun Z-Y, Jiang D-Y, Cheng Ji, Hao W-C. Integrated biochronology for Triassic marine vertebrate faunas of Guizhou Province, South China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2016;118(1):101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2006).Sun Z-Y, Sun Y-L, Hao W-C, Jiang D-Y. Conodont evidence for the age of the Panxian fauna, Guizhou, China. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2006;80:621–630. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2008).Sun Z-Y, Tintori A, Lombardo C, Jiang D-Y, Hao W-C, Sun Y-L, Wu F-X, Rusconi M. A new species of the genus Colobodus Agassiz, 1844 (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Pelsonian (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of Guizhou, South China. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia. 2008;114:363–376. [Google Scholar]
  • Swofford (2003).Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • Tintori (1990).Tintori A. Dipteronotus olgiatii n. sp. (Actinopterygii, Perleidiformes) from the Kalkschieferzone of Ca’ del Frate (N. Italy) Atti Ticinensi di Scienze della Terra. 1990;33:191–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2014).Wang Y-B, Yang D-T, Han J, Wang L-T, Yao J-X, Liu D-Y. The Triassic U–Pb age for the aquatic long-necked protorosaur of Guizhou, China. Geological Magazine. 2014;151(4):749–754. doi: 10.1017/S001675681400003X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wen et al. (2019).Wen W, Hu S-X, Zhang Q-Y, Benton MJ, Kriwet J, Chen Z-Q, Zhou C-Y, Xie T, Huang J-Y. A new species of Platysiagum from the Luoping Biota (Anisian, Middle Triassic, Yunnan, South China) reveals the relationship between Platysiagidae and Neopterygii. Geological Magazine. 2019;156(4):669–682. doi: 10.1017/S0016756818000079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Westoll (1944).Westoll TS. The Haplolepidae, a new family of Late Carboniferous bony fishes—a study in taxonomy and evolution. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 1944;83:1–121. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2013).Wu F-X, Chang M-M, Sun Y-L, Xu G-H. A new saurichthyiform (Actinopterygii) with a crushing feeding mechanism from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou (China) PLOS ONE. 2013;8(12):e81010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2015).Wu F-X, Sun Y-L, Hao W-C, Jiang D-Y, Sun Z-Y. A new species of Saurichthys (Actinopterygii; Saurichthyiformes) from the Middle Triassic of southwestern China, with remarks on pattern of the axial skeleton of saurichthyid fishes. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 2015;275(3):249–267. doi: 10.1127/njgpa/2015/0462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2011).Wu F-X, Sun Y-L, Xu G-H, Hao W-C, Jiang D-Y, Sun Z-Y. New saurichthyid actinopterygian fishes from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of southwestern China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2011;56(3):581–614. doi: 10.4202/app.2010.0007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu (2019).Xu G-H. Osteology and phylogeny of Robustichthys luopingensis, the largest holostean fish in the Middle Triassic. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7184. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu (2020a).Xu G-H. Feroxichthys yunnanensis gen. et sp. nov. (Colobodontidae, Neopterygii), a large durophagous predator from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) Luoping Biota, eastern Yunnan, China. PeerJ. 2020a;8:e10229. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu (2020b).Xu G-H. A new species of Luganoia (Luganoiidae, Neopterygii) from the Middle Triassic Xingyi Biota, Guizhou, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2020b;58:267–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu (2021).Xu G-H. A new stem-neopterygian fish from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of Yunnan, China, with a reassessment of the relationships of early neopterygian clades. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2021;191:375–394. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu, Gao & Coates (2015).Xu G-H, Gao K-Q, Coates MI. Taxonomic revision of Plesiofuro mingshuica from the Lower Triassic of northern Gansu, China, and the relationships of early neopterygian clades. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2015;35(6):e1001515. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2014.1001515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu, Ma & Zhao (2018).Xu G-H, Ma X-Y, Zhao L-J. A large peltopleurid fish from the Middle Triassic (Ladinian) of Yunnan and Guizhou, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2018;56:106–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu & Shen (2015).Xu G-H, Shen C-C. Panxianichthys imparilis gen. et sp. nov., a new ionoscopiform (Halecomorphi) from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou. China Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 2015;53:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu & Wu (2012).Xu G-H, Wu F-X. A deep-bodied ginglymodian fish from the Middle Triassic of eastern Yunnan Province, China, and the phylogeny of lower neopterygians. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2012;57(1):111–118. doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4719-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu & Zhao (2016).Xu G-H, Zhao L-J. A Middle Triassic stem-neopterygian fish from China shows remarkable secondary sexual characteristics. Science Bulletin. 2016;61(4):338–344. doi: 10.1007/s11434-016-1007-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu et al. (2012).Xu G-H, Zhao L-J, Gao K-Q, Wu F-X. A new stem-neopterygian fish from the Middle Triassic of China shows the earliest over-water gliding strategy of the vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;280(1750):20122261. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu, Zhao & Shen (2015).Xu G-H, Zhao L-J, Shen C-C. A Middle Triassic thoracopterid from China highlights the evolutionary origin of overwater gliding in early ray-finned fishes. Biology Letters. 2015;11(1):20140960. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2015).Zhang Q-Y, Hu S-X, Wen W, Zhou C-Y, Xie T, Huang J-Y. Research achievements and prospect on the Luoping Biota: according to 1: 50000 regional geological survey and achievement of specific study for Luoping, Guishan, Datong, Pengzha, Yunnan. Geological Survey of China. 2015;2:24–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2009).Zhang Q-Y, Zhou C-Y, Lü T, Xie T, Lou X-Y, Liu W, Sun Y-Y, Huang J-Y, Zhao L-S. A conodont-based Middle Triassic age assignment for the Luoping Biota of Yunnan, China. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences. 2009;52(10):1673–1678. doi: 10.1007/s11430-009-0114-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Anatomical character list, data matrix, and the strict consensus tree showing all character optimizations.
Click here for additional data file. (764.3KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11257/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Data matrix.
Click here for additional data file. (8.7KB, nex)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11257/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The online Supplemental Material are available in the Supplemental Files at PeerJ, including the anatomical character list, data matrix, and the strict consensus tree showing all character optimizations.

The specimen (IVPP V16520) illustrated and described is stored at the fossil collections of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China.

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES