Abstract
Background:
There are no meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.
Methods:
We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration to conduct this meta-analysis. Reviewers will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE online databases for all English-language cohort studies published up to April, 2021. The cohort studies focusing on assess the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of AMI will be included in our meta-analysis. At least one of the following outcomes should have been measured: reduced infarct size, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, adverse events, death and major cardiovascular events. Review Manager software will be used for the meta-analysis. All outcomes are pooled on random-effect model. A P value of <.05 is considered to be statistically significant.
Results:
Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.
Registration number:
10.17605/OSF.IO/NTU5F.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, colchicine, meta-analysis, protocol, review
1. Introduction
Inflammation is common after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The massive loss of myocardium through cell necrosis, apoptosis, and autophagy activates a strong inflammatory response that develops due to recruitment of inflammatory cells and induction of the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.[1–3] The most commonly used circulating biomarker clinically is C-reactive protein (CRP), with a peak frequently observed around day 3 after AMI. In the case of AMI, inflammation is closely associated with the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury and fibrosis.[4,5] As mentioned previously, inflammation plays a deleterious role at the onset of reperfusion. It can lead to infarct size and the process of heart remodeling, which can lead to heart failure.[6] Inflammatory status is a major predictor of adverse events after AMI. Therefore, inflammation seems to be a promising therapeutic target for patients with AMI. Several anti-inflammatory therapies appear to be potential candidates, but so far, there has been little research in this area.[7,8]
Colchicine is a well-established anti-inflammatory drug that is commonly used to treat gout, and it also targets the inflammasome. Colchicine is also used as a treatment for pericarditis. It may exert multipotent anti-inflammatory effects, particularly by inhibiting neutrophils migration, and may also have direct anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting key inflammatory signaling networks called inflammasomes and proinflammatory cytokines.[8,9] In addition, colchicine has been shown to have anti-atherosclerosis effects and has been proposed to reduce inflammation in patients with stable coronary heart disease.[10] Recently, colchicine has been shown to decrease infarct size, with a reduction in the concentration of creatine kinase muscle-brain fraction and infarct size on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with AMI.[11,12]
Currently, there are no meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of AMI. Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Search strategy
We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration to conduct this meta-analysis. The detailed guidelines can be found at www.prisma-statement.org. The systematic review protocol has been registered on Open Science Framework registries (https://osf.io/ntu5f). The registration number is 10.17605/OSF.IO/NTU5F. Reviewers will search the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE online databases using the key phrases “colchicine,” “acute myocardial infarction,” and “AMI” for all English-language cohort studies published up to April, 2021. Ethical approval is not necessary because the present meta-analysis will be performed based on previous published studies. Flow diagram of study identification is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study identification.
2.2. Eligibility criteria
The cohort studies focusing on assess the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of AMI will be included in our meta-analysis. At least one of the following outcomes should have been measured: reduced infarct size, CRP level, adverse events, death and major cardiovascular events. The exclusion criteria contain biochemical trials, reviews, case reports, no assessment of outcomes mentioned above, and no comparison of colchicine and placebo.
2.3. Data extraction
In order to achieve a consistency (at least 80%) of extracted items, the data extractors will extract data from a sample of eligible studies. Results of the pilot extraction will be discussed among review authors and extractors. Two independent reviewers will extract data with a predefined extraction template, which includes the following items: study characteristics such as the first author, publication year, study design, follow-up period; patient demographic details such as patients’ number, average age, and gender ratio. The outcomes include reduced infarct size, CRP level, adverse events, death and major cardiovascular events. The original authors will be contacted to request missing data where necessary. Extracted information will be cross-checked by 2 independent reviewers. Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved in discussion with a third reviewer.
2.4. Data analysis
Review Manager software (v 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for the meta-analysis. Continuous variables are extracted and analyzed to mean value ± SD. Standardized mean differences with a 95% confidence interval are assessed for continuous outcomes. The heterogeneity is assessed by using the Q test and I2 statistic. An I2 value of <25% is chosen to represent low heterogeneity and an I2 value of >75% to indicate high heterogeneity. All outcomes are pooled on random-effect model. A P value of <.05 is considered to be statistically significant.
2.5. Assessment of methodological quality
In order to achieve a consistency (at least 80%) of risk of bias assessment, the risk of bias assessors will pre-assess a sample of eligible studies. Results of the pilot risk of bias will be discussed among review authors and assessors. Two independent reviewers will assess the risk of bias of the included studies at study level. We will follow the guidance in the latest version of Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions when choosing and using tools to assessing risk of bias for randomized trials (version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials, RoB 2) and non-randomized trials (the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, ROBINS-I tool). Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved in discussion with a third reviewer. Studies with high risk of bias or unclear bias will be given less weight in our data synthesis.
3. Discussion
In AMI, acute ischemia causes myocardial necrosis with subsequent endogenous inflammation, leading to myocardial damage, ventricular dilation, and dysfunction. Recently, colchicine has been shown to decrease infarct size, with a reduction in the concentration of creatine kinase muscle-brain fraction and infarct size on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with AMI.[11,12] Currently, there are no meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of AMI. Our protocol is conceived to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in comparison of placebo and test the hypothesis that a short course of treatment with colchicine could lead to reduced infarct size in patients presenting with AMI.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Lingzhang Rao.
Data curation: Hui Xiong, Xianli Huang.
Formal analysis: Hui Xiong, Xianli Huang.
Funding acquisition: Jinhe Zhao.
Investigation: Hui Xiong, Xianli Huang.
Methodology: Lingzhang Rao.
Project administration: Jinhe Zhao.
Resources: Lingzhang Rao, Jinhe Zhao.
Supervision: Jinhe Zhao.
Validation: Lingzhang Rao.
Writing – original draft: Hui Xiong, Xianli Huang.
Writing – review & editing: Jinhe Zhao.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: AMI = acute myocardial infarction, CRP = C-reactive protein, PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
How to cite this article: Xiong H, Huang X, Rao L, Zhao J. Efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100:14(e25429).
HX and XH equally contributed to the study.
This study was funded by Wuhan Health Commission (WX19D55).
The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- [1].Frangogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman ML. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:31–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Arslan F, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. Innate immune signalling in cardiac ischemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:292–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Roubille F, Cayla G, Picot MC, et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) after revascularised STEMI: is CRP a prognostic factor? Rev Med Interne 2008;29:868–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Akodad M, Sicard P, Fauconnier J, et al. Colchicine and myocardial infarction: a review. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2020;113:652–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Roubille F, Tardif JC. Inflammation and the heart-prime time for new therapeutic approaches. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2013;18:259–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Chaldakov GN. Proposal for clinical trials using anti-inflammatory drugs in the therapy of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and coronary restenosis after angioplasty and bypass grafting. Med Hypotheses 1992;37:74–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Cho EH, Han K, Kim B, et al. Gliclazide monotherapy increases risks of all-cause mortality and has similar risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke with glimepiride monotherapy in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e21236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Zhou X, Chen L, Su Z, et al. Perioperative acute myocardial infarction in patients after non-cardiac surgery in China: characteristics and risk factors. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e16929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Roubille F, Kritikou E, Busseuil D, et al. Colchicine: an old wine in a new bottle? Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem 2013;12:14–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Cronstein BN, Molad Y, Reibman J, et al. Colchicine alters the quantitative and qualitative display of selectins on endothelial cells and neutrophils. J Clin Invest 1995;96:994–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Huet F, Fauconnier J, Legall M, et al. Low-dose colchicine prevents sympathetic denervation after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion: a new potential protective mechanism. Future Sci OA 2020;7:FSO656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Bresson D, Roubille F, Prieur C, et al. Colchicine for left ventricular infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study protocol-the COVERT-MI study. Cardiology 2021;01–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]