Abstract
We report a Ni-catalyzed process for the cross-coupling of tertiary alkyl nucleophiles and aryl bromides. This process is extremely general for a wide range of electrophiles and generally occurs with a ratio of retention to isomerization >30:1. The same procedure also accommodates the use of aryl triflates, vinyl chlorides, and vinyl bromides as the electrophilic component.
The development of transition metal-catalyzed C–C bond-forming cross-coupling reactions has profoundly altered the paradigms by which we approach the synthesis of organic structures.1 Although research into these cross-coupling reactions is largely focused on the creation of C(sp2)–C(sp2) bonds, transition metal-catalyzed processes that permit the use of C(sp3) nucleophiles and electrophiles have also been developed.1b,2 However, the use of secondary and tertiary nucleophiles in C–C bond-forming cross-coupling reactions still suffers from limitations.3 Recently, we reported a general Ni-catalyzed Negishi reaction that permits the cross-coupling of acyclic secondary alkylzinc halides and aryl iodides without isomerization of the secondary nucleophile.3k In an attempt to build upon this work, we investigated the possibility that a nickel-based catalytic system could support the direct cross-coupling of tertiary alkyl nucleophiles and aryl halides to form aryl-substituted quaternary centers. Carrying out such a reaction in an effective and efficient manner is indeed a significant challenge; the procedure would need to support transmetallation of a sterically hindered tertiary nucleophile, while additionally promoting facile oxidative addition and reductive elimination such that β-hydride elimination is averted (see Figure 1).4 The few existing reports of Pd- and Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions employing tertiary nucleophiles have led to the exclusive formation of isomerized cross-coupling products (via intermediates analogous to 2b)5–7 due to rapid β-hydride elimination. Recently, Hintermann has developed an elegant copper-catalyzed protocol for the cross-coupling of tertiary alkylmagnesium halides and certain polychlorinated aza–aryl electrophiles.8 However, this method has not been successfully extended to a wider range of electrophiles. Herein, we report an efficient Ni-catalyzed Kumada cross-coupling reaction of tertiary alkylmagnesium halides and aryl bromides, using commercially available N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHC) as supporting ligands.9 This process permits the formation of aryl-substituted quaternary centers without extensive formation of inseparable isomerization byproducts. In these reactions, no dependence on the electronic nature of the electrophilic component is observed. Aryl triflates, vinyl bromides, and vinyl chlorides can be additionally employed as an electrophilic partner, which significantly broadens the utility of this cross-coupling process.
Figure 1.

Proposed catalytic cycle for the Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of tertiary alkyl nucleophiles and aryl halides.
We concentrated our initial investigation on the Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of t-BuMgCl and 4-bromoanisole (4). 4-Bromoanisole (4) was selected as a model substrate because it is electronically deactivated (i.e., electron-rich), which makes it a challenging electrophile, and because its potential products (5–8) are readily analyzed by gas chromatography. Test reactions were conducted using 10 mol % Ni and 10 mol % ligand at 0 °C for 1 h in THF. In an initial screen of ligand classes, NHCs were identified as the most promising candidate for this cross-coupling reaction. Thereafter, the effect of steric and electronic perturbations of the NHC backbone was extensively investigated (Figure 2). Bulky NHC ligands were ineffective at supporting the desired transformation, leading mainly to products resulting from isomerization (6), reduction (7), or homocoupling (8). Fortunately, less hindered, electron-rich ligands such as 18 and 19 afforded mainly the desired cross-coupling product 5 while significantly decreasing the formation of byproducts (6–8).
Figure 2.

NHC ligand screen for the Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of t-BuMgCl and 4-bromoanisole.
Further optimizations of reaction conditions were initially hindered by poor reproducibility of the results shown in Figure 2. When new sources of NiCl2 were employed alongside ligand 18, increased formation of reduction product was observed, and the reactions often failed to reach completion. Closer examination of the NiCl2 source led to the conclusion that a hydrated nickel species was necessary to reproducibly achieve the results of Figure 2.10 Samples of initially anhydrous NiCl2 that had been stored outside of the glovebox for several months performed significantly better in these reactions than samples of anhydrous NiCl2 removed from the glovebox immediately prior to use. Furthermore, the addition of exogenous substoichiometric water to reactions that employed anhydrous NiCl2 directly from the glovebox led to enhanced yields of cross-coupling product and decreased reduction. However, the best yields obtained by addition of water to fresh anhydrous NiCl2 were consistently ~20% lower than the best yields obtained when hydrated samples of NiCl2 were employed. In order to determine the optimal water content for this reaction, we prepared a series of NiCl2 samples with different water content by heating NiCl2 · (H2O)6 under vacuum. These samples were then employed in the cross-coupling reaction of t-BuMgCl and 4-bromoanisole, giving the results shown in Figure 3. The most efficient catalytic systems were obtained when the nickel source consisted of 1.2–1.8 equivalents of water per molecule of NiCl2.10 When less than one equivalent of water was present per molecule of NiCl2, the yield of cross-coupling product dramatically decreased while the yield of reduction product increased.
Figure 3.

The influence of NiCl2 · (H2O)n hydration on the cross-coupling of t-BuMgCl and 4-bromoanisole as shown in Figure 2.
We selected NiCl2 · (H2O)1.5 to be the nickel source for our next series of optimization efforts.11 By reducing the reaction temperature to −10 °C and increasing the concentration of the aryl bromide to 0.5 M, we obtained the best conditions for this transformation. These conditions afforded the cross-coupling product in 90% yield with a 40:1 ratio of retention product (5) to isomerization product (6).12 The use of alternative nickel sources resulted in inferior yields, although the importance of water was again demonstrated (see Table 1, entries 5 and 6). The addition of NaOt-Bu and KOH to reactions with anhydrous NiCl2 did not result in improvement of the reaction (entries 10 and 11).13
Table 1.
Final Optimization of the Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of t-BuMgCl and 4-Bromoanisole
![]() | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | L | variation from conditions of Figure 2 | yield (%)a | 5:6a |
| 1 | 18 | 0 50 M in THF | 84 | 25:1 |
| 2 | 18 | 0 50 M in THF; 5% cat.; 5% L | 77 | 24:1 |
| 3 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C | 90 | 40:1 |
| 4 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C; | <5 | – |
| Ni(COD)2 (10%) | ||||
| 5 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C; NiBr2(10%) | 17 | 18:1 |
| 6 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C; | 83 | 38:1 |
| NiBr2−H2O (10%) | ||||
| 7 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C; | 69 | 25:1 |
| Ni(acac)2-H2O (10%) | ||||
| 8 | 18 | 050 M in THF; −10 °C; | 78 | 42:1 |
| NiCl2-glyme (10%) | ||||
| 9 | 18 | 0.50 M in THF; −10 °C; | <5 | – |
| Ni(OH)2(10%) | ||||
| 10 | 18 | 0.50 M in THF; −10 °C, | <5 | – |
| NiCl2(10%); KOH6 | ||||
| 11 | 18 | 0.50 M in THF; − 10 °C, | 32 | 35:1 |
| NiCl2(10%); NaOt-Bu | ||||
| 12 | none | 0.50 M in THF; −10 °C | 17 | 3:1 |
Yields and selectivities determined by GC.
0.4 equiv.
The conditions developed in Table 1 are general for substrates typically compatible with Grignard reactions. Both electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl substrates performed well in this reaction (Table 2). Thus, this reaction does not demonstrate sensitivity to the electronic properties of the aryl bromide. The catalytic system also displayed complete selectivity for an aryl bromide over an aryl chloride, as indicated by selective transformation of 4-bromo-chlorobenzene to 4-t-butyl-chlorobenzene. Therefore, chloroaryl-substituted quaternary centers can be easily generated for use in follow-up cross-coupling reactions. The presence of acetals, esters, pyrroles, silyl-protected alcohols, and trifluoromethoxy groups was also tolerated by the reaction conditions. When heteroaryl bromides were employed in this reaction, cross-couplings generally occurred more slowly and failed to undergo complete conversion. Despite this, products from cross-coupling reactions involving a bromoquinoline and a bromothiophene could still be generated in reasonable yields. Since sensitivity to steric effects is expected for a cross-coupling reaction involving a tertiary alkyl nucleophile, we were delighted to observe excellent reactivity when the bromide was located in the sterically hindered α-position of naphthalene. Even the presence of an ortho methyl group on the electrophile could be tolerated, although the formation of reduction product was significant in this case. In general, insignificant isomerization of the tertiary nucleophile was observed in these reactions. The ratio of retention product to isomerization product was greater than 30:1 for most substrates. Thus, the formation of inseparable isomerization products was, for the most part, unproblematic. The major byproduct formed in these reactions was the reduced aryl bromide.
Table 2.
Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of t-BuMgCl and Aryl Bromidesa
|
ArBr (1 mmol), t-BuMgCl (2 mmol); average isolated yields of two runs. Ratio (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy) of retention product to isomerization product in parentheses.
Isolated alongside an additional ~10% reduction product.
Yield determined by 1H NMR; 90% conversion by GC after 24 h.
Calibrated GC yield; 64% conversion by GC after 24 h.
In order to verify that tertiary alkylmagnesium halides could be employed in this Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling process in a general fashion, we performed cross-coupling reactions with nucleophiles other than t-BuMgCl. The presence of a mono-α-branched nucleophile (e.g., t-amylMgCl) was well tolerated in these reactions (Table 3) and resulted in negligible isomerization. The use of a cyclic tertiary nucleophile was also successful. While an acyclic bis-α-branched nucleophile could be successfully employed, ~15% of the total product was the isomerized species. These results suggest that the use of bulkier nucleophiles tends to increase the concurrent formation of isomerization products.
Table 3.
Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Aryl Bromides with Different Tertiary Alkylmagnesium Halidesa
|
ArBr (1 mmol), RMgX (2 mmol); average isolated yields of two runs. Ratio (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy) of retention product to isomerization products in parentheses.
The reaction was warmed to rt and stirred overnight (10 h).
Although aryl bromide substrates constitute the major focus of this study, we also investigated the performance of other electrophiles in this cross-coupling reaction. Nonhindered, nondeactivated aryl triflates gave good yields under reaction conditions identical to those used with aryl bromides (Table 4), but electron-rich 4-methoxy phenyl triflate and sterically hindered 1-naphthyl triflate performed poorly compared to their corresponding aryl bromides. Thus, reactions employing aryl triflates appear to be more sensitive to steric and electronic effects than the analogous aryl bromide reactions. Good yields were also obtained in cross-coupling reactions involving vinyl chlorides and vinyl bromides (Figure 4).14,15 The ability to employ such a wide variety of electrophiles without altering the reaction conditions gives this process excellent overall utility and operational simplicity.
Table 4.
Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Aryl Triflates with t-BuMgCla
|
ArBr (1 mmol), t-BuMgCl (2 mmol); average isolated yields of two runs. Ratio (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy) of retention product to isomerization product in parentheses.
Isolated alongside an additional ~10% reduction product.
Calibrated GC yield.
Figure 4.

Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of t-BuMgCl and vinyl electrophiles (ratio of retention product to isomerization product in parentheses).
In summary, we have developed a general Ni-catalyzed process for the cross-coupling of tertiary alkylmagnesium halides and aryl bromides. This process permits the efficient construction of aryl-substituted quaternary centers with nominal concurrent isomerization of the tertiary nucleophile. We have demonstrated that the same conditions used with aryl bromides can be successfully employed with aryl triflates and vinyl halides, resulting in a high degree of utility and simplicity for this process. Finally, we have shown that this process is highly dependent on the extent of NiCl2 hydration. Detailed mechanistic and kinetic studies of this reaction, and the role of water therein, are currently in progress.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We dedicate this communication to Prof. Ronald Breslow in honor of his 80th birthday and in appreciation of his mentorship. We thank The City College of New York (CCNY) and PSC-CUNY for financial support. We thank Zhiwei Yin, Mohamed Diane, and Sidra Iqbal for contributions to experiments. We gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for an instrumentation grant (CHE-0840498). Acknowledgement is additionally made to the donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (50307-DNI1) for partial support of this research.
Footnotes
Supporting Information. Procedural and spectral data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES
- (1).(a) de Meijere A, Diederich F, Eds. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2004. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rudolph A; Lautens M Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2009, 48, 2656 and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Chemler SR; Trauner D; Danishefsky SJ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2001, 40, 4544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Netherton MR; Fu GC In Topics in Organometallic Chemistry: Palladium in Organic Synthesis; Tsuji J, Ed.; Springer: New York, 2005; pp 85–108. [Google Scholar]
- (3).For recent examples of secondary nucleophiles in Pd catalysis:; (a) Campos KR; Klapars A; Walsman JH; Dormer PG; Chen CJ Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 3538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Luo X; Zhang H; Duan H; Liu Q; Zhu L; Zhang T; Lei A Org. Lett 2007, 9, 4571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dreher SD; Dormer PG; Sandrock DL; Molander GA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 9257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Han C; Buchwald SL J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 7532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Thaler T; Haag B; Gavryushin A; Schober K; Hartman E; Gschwing RM; Zipse H; Mayer P; Knochel P Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Nakao Y; Takeda M; Matsumoto T; Hiyama T Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2010, 45, 4447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Sandrock DL; Jean-Gerard L; Chen C-Y; Dreher SD; Molander GA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 17108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For recent examples of secondary nucleophiles in Ni catalysis:; (h) Melzig L; Gavryushin A; Knochel P Org. Lett 2007, 9, 5529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Smith SW; Fu GC Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2008, 47, 9334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Phapale VB; Guisan-Ceinos M; Bunuel E; Cardenas DJ Chem.—Eur. J 2009, 15, 12681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Joshi-Pangu A; Ganesh M; Biscoe MR Org. Lett 2011, 13, 1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).While a Ni(0)–Ni(II) catalytic cycle cannot be conclusively ruled out, we favor a Ni(I)–Ni(III) catalytic cycle for such Ni-catalyzed reactions. See:; (a) Phapale VB; Guisan-Ceinos M; Bunuel E; Cardenas DJ Chem.—Eur. J 2009, 15, 12681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Anderson TJ; Jones GD; Vicic DA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 8100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jones GD; Martin JL; McFarland C; Allen OR; Hall RE; Haley AD; Brandon RJ; Konovalova T; Desrochers PJ; Pulay P; Vicic DA J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 13175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) Luo X; Zhang H; Duan H; Liu Q; Zhu L; Zhang T; Lei A Org. Lett 2007, 9, 4571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Breitenfeld J; Vechorkin O; Corminboeuf C; Scopelliti R; Hu X Organometallics 2010, 29, 3686. [Google Scholar]
- (6).For a Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction involving t-BuMgCl and primary alkyl halides, see:; Terao J; Todo H; Begum SA; Kuniyasu H; Kambe N Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2007, 46, 2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).While this paper was under review, a separate Ni/NHC-catalyzed process for the cross-coupling of tertiary alkylmagnesium halides and aryl bromides was published:; Lohre C; Droge T; Wang C; Glorius F Chem.—Eur. J 2011. Early View. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Hintermann L; Xiao L; Labonne A Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2008, 47, 8246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).For reviews of NHC ligands in cross-coupling reactions, see:; (a) Marion N; Nolan S Acc. Chem. Res 2008, 41, 1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wurtz S; Glorius F Acc. Chem. Res 2008, 41, 1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Diez-Gonzalez S; Marion N; Nolan SP Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 3612 and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Droge T; Glorius F Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2010, 49, 6940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).While the exact role of water in this system remains unclear, there is precedent for a similarly important water effect with Ni-catalyzed Hiyama cross-coupling reactions in:; (e) Strotman NA; Sommer S; Fu GC Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2007, 46, 3556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Additionally, the importance of water in the activation of Pd(II) salts has been previously demonstrated. See:; (a) Ozawa F; Kubo A; Hayaski T Chem. Lett 1992, 2177. [Google Scholar]; (b) Amatore C; Carre E; Jutand A; M’Barki MA Organometallics 1995, 14, 1818. [Google Scholar]; (c) Amatore C; Jutand AJ Organomet. Chem 1999, 576, 254. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fors BP; Krattinger P; Strieter E; Buchwald SL Org. Lett 2008, 10, 3505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11). Samples of NiCl2 · (H2O)n where n = 1.4–1.7 were easily prepared on large scale by grinding NiCl2 · (H2O)6 with a mortar and pestle and heating the powder under high vacuum in an oil bath at 100 °C for 20 min, then at 120 °C for an additional 5–10 min (see Supporting Information for more details). The powder was rapidly stirred to ensure homogeneous heating. The extent of dehydration can be readily determined by the mass change before/after heating under vacuum.
- (12). In contrast to our original report on the Ni-catalyzed Negishi cross-coupling of secondary alkylzinc halides and aryl iodides with terpyridine as the ligand (ref 3k), the addition of LiCl (1 equiv) does not inhibit catalytic turnover or promote isomerization of the nucleophile.
- (13).The failure of NaOt-Bu to facilitate the reaction suggests that kinetically slow in situ deprotonation of the NHC by the Grignard reagent is not responsible for the failure of the anhydrous reactions.
- (14).Use of the vinyl bromide resulted in the formation of more reduction product than with use of the vinyl chloride.
- (15).Examples of the Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of trans-β-bromostyrene and t-BuMgCl have been previously reported in:; (a) Hayashi T; Konishi M; Yokota K; Kumada M Chem. Lett 1980, 767. [Google Scholar]; (b) Nugent WA Org. Lett 2002, 4, 2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

