Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2021 Mar 24;10(7):1346. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071346

Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, Pneumopericardium and Subcutaneous Emphysema—Not So Uncommon Complications in Patients with COVID-19 Pulmonary Infection—A Series of Cases

Talida Georgiana Cut 1, Cristina Tudoran 2,3,4,*, Voichita Elena Lazureanu 1, Adelina Raluca Marinescu 1, Raluca Dumache 5, Mariana Tudoran 2,3,4
Editor: Vito Racanelli
PMCID: PMC8036962  PMID: 33805118

Abstract

(1) Background: Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM), pneumothorax (PT), and pneumopericardium (PP) were recently reported as rare complications in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and our study aims to follow the evolution of these involvements in 11 cases. The presumed pathophysiological mechanism is air leak due to extensive diffuse alveolar damage followed by alveolar rupture. (2) Methods: We followed the occurrence of PM, PN, PP, and subcutaneous emphysema (SE) in 1648 patients hospitalized during the second outbreak of COVID-19 (October 2020–January 2021) in the main hospital of infectious diseases of our county and recorded their demographic data, laboratory investigations and clinical evolution. (3) Results: Eleven patients (0.66%) developed PM, with eight of them having associated PT, one PP, and seven SE, in the absence of mechanical ventilation. Eight patients (72.72%) died and only three (27.27%) survived. All subjects were nonsmokers, without known pulmonary pathology or risk factors for such complications. (4) Conclusions: pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, and pneumopericardium are not so uncommon complications of SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, being observed mostly in male patients with severe forms and associated with prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis. In some cases, with mild forms and reduced pulmonary injury, the outcome is favorable, not requiring surgical procedures, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care stay.

Keywords: COVID-19, spontaneous pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, inflammation, cytokine storm

1. Introduction

COVID-19 has become the largest pandemic in recent centuries and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as a large spectrum of complications. Several articles, published in the medical literature worldwide [1,2,3,4], debate sporadic cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PM), pneumothorax (PT), pneumopericardium (PP), and subcutaneous emphysema (SE) diagnosed in patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, even in the absence of mechanical ventilation associated with barotrauma. Subsequently, several retrospective studies [4,5], the largest one being a multicenter analysis of Martinelli et al. [3], focused on this topic. The principal pathophysiologic mechanism of PM is represented by the Macklin phenomenon, explaining the development of an increased pressure gradient between the marginal alveoli and the lung parenchyma, which, in the presence of the extensive alveolar injury, determines air leakage along the surrounding bronchovascular sheaths into the mediastinum. It is known that inflammation could render the alveolar wall more prone to rupture, which could be exacerbated by a persistent cough or any factors increasing the intra-alveolar pressure.

Some studies included both patients who developed PT and/or PM spontaneously, as well as those occurring during invasive positive pressure ventilation [3], where barotrauma could represent the responsible mechanism. In our study, we focused only on patients who developed these complications spontaneously during the course of COVID-19, with some of them having initially mild/moderate forms of the disease that worsened gradually [6].

The aim of this study was to follow the characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who developed PT, PM, PP, and SE and to observe which factors seem to influence the evolution and prognosis of these complications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This is a retrospective case series, describing the evolution of 11 patients out of all 1648 cases hospitalized in the clinics of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases during the second outbreak of COVID-19 from 1 October until 31 January.

2.2. Methods

We recorded their demographic data, history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and thorax computer tomography (CT) results and therapy and followed their evolution and outcome. All patients were able to sign and signed, at admission to the hospital, the standardized informed consent form required by the national health system of our country, by which they consented to their data being used for research and medical education purposes. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital Nr. 2035.

2.3. Statistical Methods

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v.25 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was employed to perform data analysis. We presented continuous variables as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) and categorical variables as frequency and percentages. We considered p-values under 0.05 to indicate statistically significant differences.

3. Results

In this study, we followed the evolution of 11 patients with COVID-19, nine men and two women, aged between 36 and 78 years, mean age 58.27 ± 12.39 years, hospitalized after two to seven days, median 4.8 (2–7) days, since the onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the diagnosis being confirmed by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). On arrival, three patients presented a medical history of hypertension, two of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and three of them obesity. All patients denied alcohol consumption and tobacco or recreational drug use. After 1 to 15 days of hospitalization, with a median of 4.45 (2–6) days, all subjects developed at least one of the following complications: PT, PM, PP, and SE. Five patients presented low oxygen saturation on room air, with values ranging between 50% and 86%, which improved up to 90–93% on a non-rebreather mask at 15 L/min, Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the patients group.

Nr. Gender Age CT Injury Days until PT PM PP SE HR Sat O2 Days of NIV Days of MV Days of ECMO Outcome
Worse-Ning Discharge/Death
1. M 64 50% 15 36 yes yes no yes 66 86% 2 11 0 fatal
2. M 61 50% 1 17 no yes no yes 82 67% 0 7 4 fatal
3. M 49 70% 3 21 no yes yes yes 100 80% 11 4 0 fatal
4. M 57 70% 6 13 yes yes no yes 95 60% 7 6 0 fatal
5. F 72 20% 1 2 yes yes no yes 70 92% 0 0 0 good
6. M 50 10% 2 7 yes no no no 70 98% 0 0 0 good
7. M 54 50% 5 40 yes yes no yes 120 60% 8 26 0 fatal
8. M 78 30% 3 26 yes no no no 100 87% 0 2 0 fatal
9. M 71 35% 4 9 yes no no no 75 90% 0 0 0 good
10. M 49 80% 3 27 yes no no no 100 93% 2 20 0 fatal
11. F 36 70% 6 12 no yes no yes 91 50% 0 2 0 fatal

Legend: Nr.—number; CT—thorax computer-tomography; PT—pneumothorax; PM—pneumomediastinum; PP—pneumopericardum; SE—subcutaneous emphysema; HR—heart rate; Sat O2—oxigen saturation; NIV—non-invasive ventilation; MV—mechanical ventilation; ECMO—extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

An initial thorax CT was performed in order to assess the presence and severity of the pulmonary injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among the most characteristic radiologic aspects were ground-glass opacities, consolidated opacities, and septa thickening. Four patients had, at admission mild pulmonary injury (10–35%), three moderate lesions (50%) and four had severe forms (over 70%). In none of the cases were PT, PM, PP, or SE present at the presentation in the emergency room, but they occurred after 1 to 15 days of hospitalization, median 4.45 (2–6) days, being associated usually with the aggravation of the pulmonary injury. Patients were monitored, in terms of vital signs, electrocardiogram, oximetry, arterial blood gases, and biological parameters to adjust therapy. Thorax CT images of 3 patients with such complications are presented in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Case 1–patient admitted with moderate COVID-19 injury, developed PT and subsequently PM. Legend: PT-pneumothorax—green arrow; PM-pneumomediastinum—orange arrow; (a) initial CT with moderate injury; (b) right PT; (c) control CT after surgical drainage of PT; (d) PM and severe pulmonary injury.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Case 2-Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Legend: PM—pneumomediastinum—orange arrow; SE—subcutaneous emphysema—blue arrow.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Case 3: Pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, and subcutaneous emphysema. Legend: PM—pneumomediastinum—orange arrow; PP—pneumopericardium—magenta arrow; SE—subcutaneous emphysema—blue arrow.

Laboratory studies evidenced elevated white cell count with neutrophilcount, median 90 (84.4–95.3)., and decreased lymphocyte count, median 5.4 (2.4–7.7). C reactive protein (CRP) presented values above 100 mg/L in seven patients, median 113.75 (53.04–247). Elevated levels of ferritin (median 2132.66 (808–2692.1)), fibrinogen (median 8.45 (5.5–9.87)), and interleukine (Il)-6 (median 87.01 (29–1245)) were observed in all patients. PH values varied during the evolution, from a median of 7.4 (7.34–7.46) initially to 7.37(7.3–7.42, p ˂ 0.001) finally, and lactate had an ascendant tendency from a median of 30.9 (19.63–43.28) initially to 32.2 (19.5–45.67, p ˂ 0.001) finally. Arterial blood gases were as follows: PO2 initially median 78 (59–83) and in evolution 54 (48–85) mmHg, with p ˂ 0.001; PCO2 initially median = 50 (46–58) and in evolution 44.3 (42–69) mmHg, p ˂ 0.001; and O2 saturation from a median of 93 (90–94.3) initially to 69.5 (65.4–96), p ˂ 0.001 finally. In evolution, six patients were associated with elevated procalcitonin levels, median 1.21 (0.15–5.87), which is highly suggestive of sepsis, Table 2.

Table 2.

Laboratory data of the cases.

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11
WBC(/mm3) 21,470 29,460 21,750 25,430 8320 5540 43,550 25,430 15,090 13,490 2340
Neutrophyls% Lymphocytes% 86.3 89.1 95.3 96.4 84.4 62.2 90.9 90.7 93.2 95.6 72.2
7.7 2.4 2.9 1.3 7.3 30.1 5.6 5.4 5.4 1.6 20.1
Ferritin (ug/L) 2132.66 2692.1 2619.3 3457.2 808 172.11 4815.3 2543 1077.1 1206.79 220.03
Fibrinogen (g/L) 6.79 9.87 8.88 ˃10 5.5 3.03 8.45 8.99 5.5 ˃10 5.2
Il-6 (pg/mL) 43.61 61.31 29.03 1245 87.01 1.5 5000 178.32 10.11 1295 89.36
CRP (mg/L) 113.75 31.67 171.1 245.17 88.22 1.26 163.13 245 53.04 345.91 74.92
Procalcitonin 1.21 0.19 25.69 9.7 0.18 0.02 3.05 5.87 0.15 3.2 0.11
(ng/mL)

Legend: WBC—white blood cell; N—neutrophils; L-lymphocytes; Il—interleukine; CRP—C reactive protein.

All patients completed a course of ceftriaxone associated with levofloxacin, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, and nadroparin. Remdesivir, tocilizumab, and anakinra were administrated to six patients (with age between 36 and 61 years, with severe pulmonary lesions and elevated Il-6 and Il-1). Throughout hospitalization, 10 patients needed supplemental oxygen supply and underwent frequent self-proning. Eight patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), and invasive ventilation was performed. One patient required additional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) because he maintained hypoxic respiratory failure despite optimization of mechanical ventilation. Cardiothoracic surgery specialists were consulted in all cases, and five patients required intercostal chest drain insertion while the rest were managed conservatively.

Eight patients died after 12 to 40 days, median 23.5 (14–33.75) days of hospitalization, with a median interval of 19.5 (9.25–25.5) days after the occurrence of the air leak. The remaining three, with reduced pulmonary injury at admission, did not require surgical drainage and were discharged in good clinical condition after a median in-hospital stay of 7 (2–7) days.

4. Discussion

As the COVID-19 pandemic evolved and the number of cases increased worldwide, several scientific papers were published in the medical literature, starting with March 2020 [7,8,9,10], reporting patients who had developed spontaneous PT, PM, or even PP, in the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation. These conditions were initially considered rare complications of the SARS-Cov2 pulmonary infection. A literature review by Elhakim et al. [4] analyzed all 15 cases published until June 2020 and concluded that most of the patients had a favorable clinical course; thus, the mortality rate was about 26%. The largest study on this topic, published at the end of August, is that of Martinelli et al., who analyzed the database of COVID-19-treating hospitals in the UK, and described the characteristics of 71 patients with PT, PM, and SE occurring both spontaneously and after mechanical ventilation [3]. By analyzing the database of the two clinics of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases from Timisoara, among all patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV2 infection during the first COVID-19 outbreak (28 February to 31 July 2020), when hospitalization was mandatary for all individuals infected with SARS-CoV 2, in contrast with the cited studies, we found no mention of such complications. On the contrary, after the second outbreak of the pandemic, since 1 October 2020 until the end of January 2021, of all 1648 patients admitted in the hospital, we observed the occurrence of these complications in 11 subjects, leading to a prevalence of 0.66%, similar to around 1% reported for hospitalized patients in the medical literature [3,11,12,13]. As in the other studies, the male gender prevailed (72.72%), and the supposed pathophysiological mechanisms were air leakage through the alveolar walls, damage by inflammation, and damage by the subsequent cytokine storm [1,2,5,14]. In our patients, all these complications occurred spontaneously, after several days of evolution, often coinciding with the aggravation of pulmonary lesions, but in the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. PT was diagnosed the most frequently (in eight cases—72.72%), followed by PM, associated with SE in all these patients (seven cases—63.63%), while PP was identified only in one subject (9.09%). In contrast to other studies where lower mortality was reported [4,15,16], in our patients, PT, PM, and PP frequently led to a fatal outcome (72.72%), despite intensive care measures, including ECMO in one case. Mortality for ECMO-supported patients with COVID-19 has been associated in the literature with risk factors such as age > 65 years, poor baseline functional status such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on home O2 therapy, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, or acute kidney injury. Our patient had no absolute contraindications for veno-venous ECMO. The oxygenation and ventilation improved in the first 3 days after ECMO initiation. Nevertheless, it is unclear what the outcome of the patient would have been if he had not received ECMO. In the cases with fatal outcome, clinical status worsening coincided with the augmentation of inflammation markers as procalcitonin, ferritin, fibrinogen, interleukin-6, as well as with deterioration of blood gases, lactate, and PH. In our study, the patients who survived had a less severe pulmonary injury (under 35%) and were hospitalized sooner after the onset of symptoms, with an earlier start of specific therapy to avoid the progression of the existing pulmonary lesions and without secondary microbial infection, expressed by low levels of serum procalcitonin.

5. Conclusions

Pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, and pneumopericardium are not rare complications and are diagnosed more frequently in male patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, being associated with prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; methodology, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; software, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; validation, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; formal analysis, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; investigation, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; resources, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; data curation, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; writing—review and editing, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; visualization, T.G.C., C.T., V.E.L., A.R.M., R.D., and M.T.; supervision, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; project administration, T.G.C., C.T., and M.T.; funding acquisition, not applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases “Victor Babes” Timisoara Nr. 2035.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All available data are presented in the two tables included in the manuscript, therefore if you consider necessary to upload them supplimentary on-line please inform us.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hamad A.-M.M., Elmahrouk A.F., Abdulatty O.A. Alveolar Air Leakage in COVID-19 Patients: Pneumomediastinum and/or Pneumopericardium. Heart Lung. 2020;49:881–882. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brito D.A.M. COVID-19 Pneumonia Associated With Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum and Pneumopericardium. CTSNET. 2020 doi: 10.25373/ctsnet.12485831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martinelli A.W., Ingle T., Newman J., Nadeem I., Jackson K., Lane N.D., Melhorn J., Davies H.E., Rostron A.J., Adeni A., et al. COVID-19 and Pneumothorax: A Multicentre Retrospective Case Series. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;56 doi: 10.1183/13993003.02697-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elhakim T.S., Abdul H.S., Pelaez Romero C., Rodriguez-Fuentes Y. Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax and Subcutaneous Emphysema in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Rare Case and Literature Review. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e239489. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Juárez-Lloclla J.P., León-Jiménez F., Urquiaga-Calderón J., Temoche-Nizama H., Bryce-Alberti M., Portmann-Baracco A., Bryce-Moncloa A. Spontaneous Pneumopericardium and Pneumomediastinum in Twelve COVID-19 Patients. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2021;57:86–88. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.López Vega J.M., Parra Gordo M.L., Diez Tascón A., Ossaba Vélez S. Pneumomediastinum and Spontaneous Pneumothorax as an Extrapulmonary Complication of COVID-19 Disease. Emerg. Radiol. 2020:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01806-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang J., Su X., Zhang T., Zheng C. Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum: A Probable Unusual Complication of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Korean J. Radiol. 2020;21:627–628. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou C., Gao C., Xie Y., Xu M. COVID-19 with Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:510. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30156-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun R., Liu H., Wang X. Mediastinal Emphysema, Giant Bulla, and Pneumothorax Developed during the Course of COVID-19 Pneumonia. Korean J. Radiol. 2020;21:541–544. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh A., Bass J., Lindner D.H. Rare Complication of Pneumomediastinum and Pneumopericardium in a Patient with COVID-19 Pneumonia. [(accessed on 28 January 2021)]; doi: 10.1155/2020/8845256. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cripu/2020/8845256/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Hameed M., Jamal W., Yousaf M., Thomas M., Haq I.U., Ahmed S., Ahmad M., Khatib M. Pneumothorax In Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Case Series. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2020;31:101265. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mohan V., Tauseen R.A. Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e236519. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zantah M., Dominguez Castillo E., Townsend R., Dikengil F., Criner G.J. Pneumothorax in COVID-19 Disease- Incidence and Clinical Characteristics. Respir. Res. 2020;21:236. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01504-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alharthy A., Bakirova G.H., Bakheet H., Balhamar A., Brindley P.G., Alqahtani S.A., Memish Z.A., Karakitsos D. COVID-19 with Spontaneous Pneumothorax, Pneumomediastinum, and Subcutaneous Emphysema in the Intensive Care Unit: Two Case Reports. J. Infect. Public Health. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gorospe L., Ayala-Carbonero A., Ureña-Vacas A., Fra Fernández S., Muñoz-Molina G.M., Arrieta P., Almonacid-Sánchez C., Ramos-Sánchez A., Filigheddu E., Pérez-Fernández M. Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum in Patients With COVID-19: A Case Series of Four Patients. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2020;56:754–756. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Janssen M.L., van Manen M.J.G., Cretier S.E., Braunstahl G.-J. Pneumothorax in Patients with Prior or Current COVID-19 Pneumonia. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2020;31:101187. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All available data are presented in the two tables included in the manuscript, therefore if you consider necessary to upload them supplimentary on-line please inform us.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES