Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2021 Mar 29;22(7):3518. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073518

Developmental and Neurotoxicity of Acrylamide to Zebrafish

Jong-Su Park 1,†, Palas Samanta 1,2,†, Sangwoo Lee 1, Jieon Lee 1, Jae-Woo Cho 3, Hang-Suk Chun 1, Seokjoo Yoon 4, Woo-Keun Kim 1,*
Editor: João Pedro Silva
PMCID: PMC8037265  PMID: 33805345

Abstract

Acrylamide is a commonly used industrial chemical that is known to be neurotoxic to mammals. However, its developmental toxicity is rarely assessed in mammalian models because of the cost and complexity involved. We used zebrafish to assess the neurotoxicity, developmental and behavioral toxicity of acrylamide. At 6 h post fertilization, zebrafish embryos were exposed to four concentrations of acrylamide (10, 30, 100, or 300 mg/L) in a medium for 114 h. Acrylamide caused developmental toxicity characterized by yolk retention, scoliosis, swim bladder deficiency, and curvature of the body. Acrylamide also impaired locomotor activity, which was measured as swimming speed and distance traveled. In addition, treatment with 100 mg/L acrylamide shortened the width of the brain and spinal cord, indicating neuronal toxicity. In summary, acrylamide induces developmental toxicity and neurotoxicity in zebrafish. This can be used to study acrylamide neurotoxicity in a rapid and cost-efficient manner.

Keywords: acrylamide, neurotoxicity, zebrafish, developmental toxicity, disease models, neurodevelopmental disorders

1. Introduction

Acrylamide is a water-soluble alkene primarily used to synthesize polyacrylamide for personal care products, and is also used in various chemical industries, wastewater treatment processes, chemical grouting, and soil conditioning [1,2]. Acrylamide is a common ingredient in plant-based foods, such as potato and grain products and in roasted coffee [3,4]. Its polymeric form is non-toxic but its monomeric form is highly toxic to rats and mice [5,6], with carcinogenic [7], teratogenic [8,9], and neurotoxic [1,5] effects. Human exposure to acrylamide results in neurotoxicity that is characterized by lethargy, skeletal muscle weakness, gait abnormalities, weight loss, ataxia, numbness of the extremities, and polyneuropathy [6,10]. Acrylamide neurotoxicity has been associated with central–peripheral distal axonopathy [11,12]. Molecular initiating events of acrylamide neurotoxicity include formation of adducts with sulfhydryl thiolate sites specifically involved in synaptic vesicle recycling in vesicle docking (synaptotagmin, synaptophysin, and syntaxin), vesicle priming (complexin 2), SNARE (SNAP Receptor) core dissolution (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor), endocytosis (clathrin), neurotransmitter re-uptake (membrane dopamine transporter), and vesicular storage (vesicular monoamine transporter) at nerve terminals [13]. The developmental toxicity of acrylamide has been characterized in laboratory animals, but developmental neurotoxicity has not, highlighting the need for validated animal models of acrylamide-induced developmental neurotoxicity for the clinical management of patients affected by occupational exposure to acrylamide [14,15].

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a popular vertebrate model in developmental biology and has been used in neurotoxicity studies [16]. Its short generation time, high fecundity, and transparent body make it ideal for developmental toxicity assays [17], and it is suitable for the in vivo high-throughput screening of chemicals [18]. Additionally, zebrafish brain and central nervous system development occurs within 3 days post fertilization (dpf) [19]. Zebrafish share almost 70% DNA sequence homology with humans and possess similar neurotransmitters [20,21,22,23]. Hence, zebrafish are used as an intermediate model organism between cell-based assays and mammalian testing. Furthermore, chemical-induced malformations in zebrafish can easily be observed under a stereomicroscope because of their transparent bodies [24,25]. Acute acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in adult zebrafish has been investigated previously with a 0.75 mM (51.31 mg/L) concentration [26,27], but the larval model is not well-established [18].

In this study, we exposed zebrafish embryos 6 h post fertilization (hpf) to acrylamide for 5 days to evaluate general toxic responses, developmental and behavioral outcomes, and neurotoxic and pathological effects. We aimed to verify the suitability of zebrafish larvae for acute acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity testing and to establish zebrafish as an alternative model.

2. Results

2.1. Acrylamide-Induced Developmental Defects

Zebrafish embryos exposed to acrylamide from 6 hpf, exhibited concentration- and time-dependent increases in mortality. An initial rise in mortality was observed after 72 h that continued throughout the exposure period. The LC50, LC25, and LC10 values at 120 hpf were 142.59, 54.77, and 30.85 mg/L, respectively.

Morphology, survival, hatching, and heart rate were measured in 24 h intervals (Figure 1). Various embryonic abnormalities were observed in acrylamide-treated fish from 24 to 120 hpf, including yolk retention, scoliosis, swim bladder deficiency, heart edema, and body curvature (Figure S1), with heart edema and yolk retention being the most pronounced. Exposure to 100 mg/L acrylamide shows 50–70% morphological malformation at 120 hpf. No mortality was observed in control zebrafish throughout the exposure period. Exposure to 300 mg/L acrylamide caused mortality at 72 hpf, and no fish survived at the 96-hpf measurement point (Figure 1A). The hatching rate was 100% in the control group, but this decreased gradually with increasing acrylamide concentrations to 53.3 ± 5.8% in the 300 mg/L acrylamide group (Figure 1B). Heartbeat decreased in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1C). Blood flow was reduced with increasing acrylamide concentrations throughout the exposure period. At 24 hpf, heart rate was 62.5 ± 0.5, 59.9 ± 0.4, 53.3 ± 0.2, 51.9 ± 0.7, and 46.0 ± 0.6 beats per minute in fish exposed to 0, 10, 30, 100, and 300 mg/L, respectively. At 48 hpf and 72 hpf, heart rate was 119.6 ± 4.1, 115.7 ± 2.1, 109.9 ± 2.5, 101.1 ± 2.9, and 89.7 ± 3.4 beats per minute and 147.6 ± 3.7, 138.9 ± 2.5, 129.6 ± 4.66, 121.5 ± 3.9, and 68.4 ± 9.6 beats per minute, respectively (n = 30). In the 300 mg/L acrylamide group, heart rate was much lower than in other groups, and by 80 hpf, all embryos had died.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Acrylamide exposure negatively affects survival (A), hatching (B), and heart rate (C). n = 30 for each dose, respectively. * p < 0.01. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

2.2. Behavior

At 5 dpf, acrylamide treatment led to a decrease in total distance traveled and swimming speed in wild-type larvae (at 10 mg/L, 105.85 ± 8.39 cm and 0.19 ± 0.02 cm/s, respectively, n = 24; at 30 mg/L, 103.05 ± 6.93 cm and 0.18 ± 0.02 cm/s, respectively, n = 24). However, these values did not differ significantly from those recorded for the controls. Control group shows active swimming movement in whole plate, while 100 mg/L group shows swimming in the border of plate and circular movement, which indicated neuronal damaged related movement (Figure 2A, Video S1). Treatment with 100 mg/L acrylamide induced a significant decrease in total distance traveled and swimming speed than in other exposure groups (78.47 ± 4.16 cm and 0.13 ± 0.01 cm/s, respectively; n = 24). In addition, larvae exposed to 100 mg/L acrylamide exhibited circular movement (Figure 2A–C). In control groups, zebrafish exhibited normal behavior in total distance traveled and swimming speed (128.56 ± 11.4 cm and 0.24 ± 0.03 cm/s, respectively; n = 24).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Behavioral effects following a 5-day exposure to acrylamide. (A). Acrylamide-treated wild-type zebrafish larvae exhibited impaired locomotor activity (circular movement and decreased swimming speed and distance traveled) that was concentration-dependent. (B). Distance traveled. (C). Swimming speed. * p < 0.01. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

2.3. Neurotoxicity

Pan-neuronal cell fluorescence intensities of the transgenic tg(elavl3:eGFP) strain were analyzed to determine the presence of acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity by the width of axons in the brain and spinal cord (Figure 3A,A’,A”). At 48 hpf, brain width was unchanged in all treatment groups (181.21 ± 4.11, 184.26 ± 2.14, 188.13 ± 6.90, and 181.17 ± 4 µm for 0, 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively; n = 10). At 72 hpf and 100 mg/L, brain width was slightly shorter than in controls (238.75 ± 4.04, 233.33 ± 6.03, 236.09 ± 5.34, and 220.17 ± 3.21 µm for 0, 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively; n = 10; (Figure 3B,C). At 96 hpf, brain width was 259.77 ± 3.48 µm in controls and 252.98 ± 3.75, 253.23 ± 3.67, and 223.98 ± 7.94 µm in fish exposed to 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively (n = 10). At 100 mg/L, brain width was consistently below control width until 120 hpf. At that time, brain width was 253.18 ± 4.53 in controls and 258.98 ± 5.84, 253.6 ± 4.45, and 227.57 ± 14.7 µm in fish exposed to 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively (n = 10; Figure 3B,C). Overall, exposure to 100 mg/L acrylamide severely affected brain development in zebrafish.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Acrylamide-induced neurotoxicity in transgenic tg(elavl3:eGFP) zebrafish. (A–A”). Pan-neuronal cells were used to analyze neurotoxicity. Brain width (A’) and spinal cord neuron width (A”) were measured. (B). Brain neurotoxicity. From 72 hpf onwards, zebrafish larvae treated with 100 mg/L acrylamide exhibited shorter brain width than controls. White asterisks denote severely short brain width. (C). Brain width. Brain width was shorter at the 72–120 hpf measurement time points in fish exposed to 100 mg/L acrylamide (n = 10). * p < 0.01. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Spinal cord neuronal width did not appear to be affected by any of the acrylamide exposures until 48 hpf (Figure 4A,B). However, measurements differed markedly at 72 hpf (58.55 ± 0.82 µm in controls and 61.33 ± 1.25, 61.26 ± 1.31, and 55.58 ± 1.38 µm in fish exposed to 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively; n = 10). Spinal cord width in fish exposed to 100 mg/L was shorter than in controls (Figure 4B). At 96 hpf, spinal cord width decreased as acrylamide concentrations increased (60.34 ± 0.7 µm in controls and 60.11 ± 1, 58.53 ± 1.45, and 55.9 ± 0.76 µm in fish exposed to 10, 30, and 100 mg/L, respectively; n = 10). However, at 120 hpf, spinal cord width in fish exposed to 100 mg/L acrylamide (55 ± 2.09 µm) did not differ from spinal cord width in controls (58.53 ± 1.14 µm, n = 10; Figure 4A,B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Comparison of spinal cord neuronal width between controls and acrylamide-treated zebrafish. (A). Spinal cord neuron width was similar between groups until 48 hpf. Between 72 and 96 hpf, fish treated with 100 mg/L acrylamide exhibited shorter spinal cord width (white asterisks). (B). Spinal cord neuronal width (n = 10). * p < 0.01. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

We did not observe defects in mature, myelinating oligodendrocytes or Schwann cells in the tg(mbp:mGFP) line (Figure S2 and Figure S3) at 100 mg/L acrylamide. Similarly, the tg(sox10:eGFP) line spinal cord neurons showed normal numbers and morphology (Figure S4).

3. Discussion

The toxicity of acrylamide has been thoroughly demonstrated in rodent models using acute lethality and behavioral endpoints [4,28,29]. However, there is a lack of information on acrylamide-induced developmental toxicity in rodents because of the associated cost. Consequently, the use of zebrafish in studying developmental toxicity has increased steadily [30,31]. Acrylamide-induced behavioral, transcriptional, and proteome responses have been shown in zebrafish [18,22], and zebrafish have been used to evaluate the developmental neurotoxicity of other environmental toxicants [32]. Therefore, we aimed to establish zebrafish as a model of acrylamide-induced developmental neurotoxicity using standard toxicological endpoints.

Embryo mortality increased in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, consistent with previous reports. A 72 h LC50 value of 86.007 mg/L acrylamide has previously been calculated for adult zebrafish [22], similar to the 142.59 mg/L value we calculated for a 5-day exposure period. Rates of zebrafish lethality were comparable to rates observed in rodents [33,34,35]. Acrylamide also inhibited hatching with increasing concentration and duration of exposure. The reasons behind this could be due to the induction of developmental defects [36]. However, our results in 100 mg/L show that even malformation occurred, the hatching rate was not changed significantly. Additionally, these data suggest that developmental defects can cause delayed hatching, but are not the only factors affecting the hatching rate. Additionally, this demonstrates it’s the possible effects of acrylamide on the circulatory and nervous systems [24].

Acrylamide treatment caused a concentration-dependent increase in developmental malformations in the zebrafish embryos, which occurred within 24 h of acrylamide exposure, indicating possible teratogenic effects [36]. The early adverse physiological effects were observed in the yolk extension in the developing embryo, followed by pericardial yolk sac edema, swim bladder deficiency, and curvature of the body. Similar developmental abnormalities were reported in zebrafish embryos and larvae following psoralen exposure [17], indicating that organogenesis may be the developmental stage that is most sensitive to toxicants [36]. We found that the severity of these abnormalities increased with the acrylamide concentration and was accompanied by mortality [37]. Therefore, embryo mortality can be directly linked to the severity of developmental malformations. In addition, the reduced heart rate indicated cardiac dysfunction from pericardial edema [24,36] and included notable reductions in heartbeat. Pericardial edema formation collapses the yolk sphere, which prevents the heart from undergoing normal chamber formation [38]. Development of pericardial edema indicates structural cardiac abnormalities following acrylamide exposure [17,24]. Therefore, our findings indicate that acrylamide exposure led to the development of acute lethality and developmental toxicity accompanied by cardiac dysfunction in zebrafish embryos.

Generally, acrylamide developmental neurotoxicity in mammals is characterized by motor function defects [13]. We used basal locomotor activities, namely swimming speed and total distance traveled, as markers of neurotoxicity. The behavioral effects of acrylamide on zebrafish have not been studied extensively, but our data appear similar to those of a study that found a concentration-dependent decrease in swimming speed and total distance traveled [22]. Exposure to 100 mg/L acrylamide resulted in circular movements, indicating a movement disorder [38]. In order to rule out the consequences due to developmental defects, experiments were conducted only with embryos without developmental defects. Moreover, the reduction in swimming speed indicates toxicity to the developing nervous system [17]. We can, therefore, conclude that acrylamide induces damage to the brain and spinal cord neurons in zebrafish, leading to movement disorders not unlike those seen in humans [38].

Alterations in the width of brain and spinal cord neurons in tg(elavl3:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish indicated a toxic effect of acrylamide on the nervous system [17]. Zebrafish spinal cords are useful indicators because of their regeneration capacity and easily detected characteristics [37]. Additionally, the decline in brain and spinal cord widths at 72 hpf following exposure to 100 mg/L acrylamide indicated high toxicity. Accordingly, the tg(elavl3:eGFP) line is good for determining acrylamide neurotoxicity and associated neurotoxic modeling. Altogether, these findings indicate that acrylamide causes severe neurodevelopmental and teratogenic defects.

Previous mammal histological analyses confirmed whether neurological damage in rats was comparable to the outcomes observed in zebrafish, i.e., axonal degeneration and secondary demyelination [18,39]. Sciatic nerve axonal degeneration occurred in Wistar rats exposed to 30 mg/kg acrylamide [40,41]. Vacuolation either in the overlying layer or in striated arrangement from the Purkinje cell layer to the pial membrane indicates progressive cavitation and severe axonal degeneration [42,43]. Acrylamide caused Purkinje cell death, which was particularly prominent at the nerve terminal.

The transgenic tg(elavl3:eGFP) line expresses fluorescence in pan-neuronal cells, enabling the analysis of whole neurons. However, chemicals that only target specific regions of neurons or only specific cell types cannot be assessed using this transgenic strain, and normal fluorescence from adjacent cells may overlap. Therefore, additional laboratory techniques, such as immunohistochemistry, RNA-seq, and qPCR, are required to identify changes at the molecular or cellular level following exposure. In summary, acrylamide exerts developmental toxicity in zebrafish, which represent an alternative animal model for screening molecules for neurodevelopmental toxicity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

AB wild-type and tg(elavl3:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish Center for Disease Modeling, Republic of Korea, and maintained at 28 ± 0.5 °C with a 14/10 h light/dark cycle under standard conditions in a fish breeding circulatory system installed at the Korea Institute of Toxicology. Adult fish were fed Artemia twice a day. Embryos were produced by spawning, where two or three pairs of adult male and female zebrafish were placed overnight in mating tanks with shallow water, separated by a removable partition. After the partition was removed, fish were allowed to spawn and embryos were collected after 30 min. These were then washed with egg water (30 mg sea salt in 500 mL distilled water) and placed in a Petri dish. All experimental protocols and procedures were approved and conducted according to the guidelines and regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Korea Institute of Toxicology (approval number RS19006, July, 29th, 2019).

4.2. Acrylamide Experimental Procedure

Acrylamide (CAS 79-06-1, purity > 99%, M.W. 71.08) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (A9099; St. Louis, MO, USA). Exposure concentrations of 10, 30, 100, and 300 mg/L (0.14, 0.42, 1.4 and 4.2 mM, respectively) were selected from previous studies [18,36]. For zebrafish, test solutions were prepared on the day of the experiment in E3 medium (0.292 g NaCl, 0.013 g KCl, 0.044 g CaCl, and 0.081 g MgSO4 in 1 L) containing a 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution. Control groups were exposed to 0.1% DMSO. For rats, test solutions were dissolved in distilled water for oral injection, and distilled water served as the vehicle control.

Healthy zebrafish embryos (both transgenic and AB) from the same developmental stage were selected using a microscope 6 hpf and placed in 12-well plates, with three replicates for each control and treatment group. Ten embryos were placed in each plates, dead and hatched embryos were counted and removed every day. The embryos were then immediately exposed to the selected acrylamide concentrations until 5 dpf. Media were replaced every 24 h with fresh 0.1% DMSO solution and the respective acrylamide concentrations. Transgenic zebrafish were used for assessing neurotoxicity and the AB wild-type strain was used for analyzing general developmental toxicity and behavior.

4.3. Lethality and Developmental Toxicity

The number of dead zebrafish per exposure group was recorded at each measurement time point (24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h), and the half-maximal lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated. Lethality curves were established at each measurement time point. The hatching rate was also recorded. Heart rate was measured by recording heartbeat for 15 s and extrapolating to beats per minute under tricaine (ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methane sulfonate salt; Sigma-Aldrich (St.Louis, MO, USA); pH 7 adjusted by Tris to pH 9) treatment to anesthetic embryos. This measurement was repeated for three replicates per larva and the mean heart rate was used as the individual heart rate. For phenotypic or morphological analyses, zebrafish were observed and photographed at each measurement time point to check for malformations. The survival, hatching, heartbeat, and malformation rates were calculated manually.

4.4. Behavior

Total distance traveled and swimming speed were analyzed in AB larvae at 5 dpf. To exclude consequences due to morphological malformations, we use no morphological defect larvae in behavior test. Twenty-four larvae from each group were introduced into 24-well plates (one larva per well) containing 1 mL E3 medium and placed in a DanioVision recording system equipped with EthoVision XT11 version software (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands). Larvae were then acclimatized for 10 min in the dark followed by tracking for 10 min in light. All measurements were performed in the afternoon between 2:00 and 5:00 PM.

4.5. Neurotoxicity

tg(elavl3:eGFP) zebrafish from the control and acrylamide groups were anesthetized using tricaine and mounted on glass slides, then examined and photographed under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss AXIO Imager Z2, Oberkochen, Germany). Brain (mid-region of midbrain) and spinal cord (behind the swim bladder) widths were examined and calculated using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All data are represented as means ± standard error of the mean. The results were analyzed by GraphPad Prism version 5 (San Diego, CA, USA). For the normality and homogeneity of each variance, the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Levene’s test were used, respectively. Data follow a normal distribution. One-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test or Student’s t-test were used to identify differences between groups, with p ≤ 0.01 considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

Zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish Center for Disease Modeling (ZCDM), Korea.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22073518/s1.

Click here for additional data file. (14.2MB, zip)

Author Contributions

W.-K.K. conceptualized this study, reviewed and edited the manuscript; the methodology was designed by J.-S.P., H.-S.C. and J.-W.C.; the investigation was carried out by J.-S.P., P.S., J.-W.C., S.L., and J.L.; J.-S.P. and P.S. prepared the original draft; J.-S.P., P.S. and S.L. analyzed data; Supervision and project administration was done by W.-K.K. and S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (2019002490006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental protocols and procedures were approved and conducted according to the guidelines and regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Korea Institute of Toxicology (approval number RS19006).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Seale S.M., Feng Q., Agarwal A.K., El-alfy A.T. Neurobehavioral and transcriptional effects of acrylamide in juvenile rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012;101:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dasari S., Ganjayi M.S., Meriga B. Glutathione S-transferase is a good biomarker in acrylamide induced neurotoxicity and genotoxicity. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2018;11:115–121. doi: 10.2478/intox-2018-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arikawa A., Shiga M. Determination of trace acrylamide in the crops by gas chromatography. Bunseki Kagaku. 1980;29:33–39. doi: 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.29.7_T33. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Al-serwi R.H., Ghoneim F.M. The impact of vitamin E against acrylamide induced toxicity on skeletal muscles of adult male albino rat tongue: Light and electron microscopy study. J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 2015;3:137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmau.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lehning E.J., Balaban C.D., Ross J.F., Lopachin R.M. Acrylamide neuropathy III. spatiotemporal characteristics of nerve cell damage in forebrain. Neurotoxicology. 2003;24:125–136. doi: 10.1016/S0161-813X(02)00155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lopachin R.M., Decaprio A.P. Gamma-diketone neuropathy: Axon atrophy and the role of cytoskeletal protein adduction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004;199:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hogervorst J.G.F., Baars B.J., Schouten L.J., Konings E.J.M., Goldbohm R.A., Brandt P.A.V.D. The carcinogenicity of dietary acrylamide intake: A comparative discussion of epidemiological and experimental animal research. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2010;40:485–512. doi: 10.3109/10408440903524254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Favor J., Shelby M.D. Transmitted mutational events induced in mouse germ cells following acrylamide or glycidamide exposure. Mutat. Res. 2005;580:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ma Y., Shi J., Zheng M., Liu J., Tian S., He X., Zhang D., Li G., Zhu J. Toxicological effects of acrylamide on the reproductive system of weaning male rats. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 2011;27:617–627. doi: 10.1177/0748233710394235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Auld R.B., Bedwell S.F. Peripheral neuropathy with sympathetic overactivity from industrial contact with acrylamide. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1967;96:652–654. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lehning E.J., Balaban C.D., Ross J.F., Reid M.A., Lopachin R.M. Acrylamide neuropathy I. spatiotemporal characteristics of nerve cell damage in rat cerebellum. Neurotoxicology. 2002;23:397–414. doi: 10.1016/S0161-813X(02)00083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lopachin R.M., Balaban C.D., Ross J.F. Acrylamide axonopathy revisited. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2003;188:135–153. doi: 10.1016/S0041-008X(02)00072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopachin R.M., Gavin T. Molecular mechanism of acrylamide neurotoxicity: Lessons learned from organic chemistry. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012;120:1650–1657. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Field E.A., Price C.J., Sleet R.B., Marr M.C., Schwetz B.A., Morrissey R.E. Developmental toxicity evaluation of acrylamide in rats and mice. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1990;14:502–512. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(90)90254-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu F., Wang J., Jiao J., Zhang Y. Exposure to acrylamide induces skeletal developmental toxicity in zebrafish and rat embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2021;271:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vesterlund L., Jiao H., Unneberg P., Hovatta O., Kere J. The zebrafish transcriptome during early development. BMC Dev. Biol. 2011;11:1–18. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xia Q., Wei L., Zhang Y., Kong H., Shi Y., Wang X., Chen X., Han L., Liu K. Psoralen induces developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos / larvae through oxidative stress, apoptosis, and energy metabolism disorder. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prats E., Gómez-Canela C., Ben-Lulu S., Ziv T., Padrós F., Tornero D., Garcia-Reyero N., Tauler R., Admon A., Raldúa D. Modelling acrylamide acute neurotoxicity in zebrafish larvae. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14460-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kalueff A.V., Echevarria D.J., Homechaudhuri S., Stewart A.M., Collier A.D., Kaluyeva A.A., Li S., Liu Y., Chen P., Wang J., et al. Zebrafish neurobehavioral phenomics for aquatic neuropharmacology and toxicology research. Aquat. Toxicol. 2016;170:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Howe K., Clark M.D., Torroja C.F., Torrance J., Berthelot C., Muffato M., Collins J.E., Humphray S., McLaren K., Matthews L., et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature. 2013;496:498–503. doi: 10.1038/nature12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Babin P.J., Goizet C., Raldu D. Zebrafish models of human motor neuron diseases: Advantages and limitations. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014;118:36–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Faria M., Garcia-Reyero N., Padrós F., Babin P.J., Sebastián D., Cachot J., Prats E., Arick Ii M., Rial E., Knoll-Gellida A., et al. Zebrafish models for human acute organophosphorus poisoning. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–15. doi: 10.1038/srep15591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Horzmann K.A., Freeman J.L. Zebrafish get connected: Investigating neurotransmission targets and alterations in chemical toxicity. Toxics. 2016;4:19. doi: 10.3390/toxics4030019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang M., Jiao J., Wang J., Xia Z., Zhang Y. Characterization of acrylamide-induced oxidative stress and cardiovascular toxicity in zebrafish embryos. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018;347:451–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qian L., Cui F., Yang Y., Liu Y., Qi S., Wang C. Mechanisms of developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) induced by boscalid. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;634:478–487. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Faria M., Ziv T., Gómez-Canela C., Ben-Lulu S., Prats E., Novoa-Luna K.A., Admon A., Piña B., Tauler R., Gómez-Oliván L.M., et al. Acrylamide acute neurotoxicity in adult zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26343-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Faria M., Valls A., Prats E., Bedrossiantz J., Orozco M., Porta J.M., Gómez-Oliván L.M., Raldúa D. Further characterization of the zebrafish model of acrylamide acute neurotoxicity: Gait abnormalities and oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 2019;1:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43647-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lebda M.A., Gad S.B., Rashed R.R. The effect of lipoic acid on acrylamide-induced neuropathy in rats with reference to biochemical, hematological, and behavioral alterations. Pharm. Biol. 2015;8:1207–1213. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.970288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Belhadj Benziane A., Dilmi Bouras A., Mezaini A., Belhadri A., Benali M. Effect of oral exposure to acrylamide on biochemical and hematologic parameters in Wistar rat. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2019;42:157–166. doi: 10.1080/01480545.2018.1450882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.de Esch C., Slieker R., Wolterbeek A., Woutersen R., de Groot D. Zebrafish as potential model for developmental neurotoxicity testing: A mini review. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2012;34:545–553. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2012.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee J., Freeman J.L. Zebrafish as a model for investigating developmental lead (Pb) neurotoxicity as a risk factor in adult neurodegenerative disease: A mini-review. Neurotoxicology. 2014;43:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mcgrath P., Li C.Q. Zebrafish: A predictive model for assessing drug-induced toxicity. Drug Discov. Today. 2008;13:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adler I., Schmer R. Dose response for heritable translocations induced by acrylamide in spermatids of mice. Mutat. Res. 1994;309:285–291. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90103-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tyla R.W., Friedman M.A., Losco P.E., Fisher L.C., Johnson K.A., Strother D.E., Wolf C.H. Rat two-generation reproduction and dominant lethal study of acrylamide in drinking water. Reprod. Toxicol. 2000;14:385–401. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(00)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.USEPA . Toxicology Review of Acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2004. pp. 1–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Spencer H., Wahome J., Haasch M. Toxicity evaluation of acrylamide on the early life stages of the zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) J. Environ. Protection. 2018;9:1082–1091. doi: 10.4236/jep.2018.910067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Asakawa K., Abe G., Kawakami K., Baier H. Cellular dissection of the spinal cord motor column by BAC transgenesis and gene trapping in zebrafish. Front. Neural Circuits. 2013;7:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pennisi M., Malaguarnera G., Puglisi V., Vinciguerra L. Neurotoxicity of acrylamide in exposed workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2013;10:3843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10093843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lopachin R.M., He D., Reid M.L., Opanashuk L.A. 2,5-hexanedione-induced changes in the monomeric neurofilament protein content of rat spinal cord fractions. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004;198:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tian S.M., Ma Y.X., Shi J., Lou T.Y., Liu S.S., Li G.Y. Acrylamide neurotoxicity on the cerebrum of weaning rats. Neural Regen. Res. 2015;10:938–943. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.158357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kandhare A.D., Mukherjee A.A., Bodhankar S.L. Neuroprotective effect of azadirachta indica standardized extract in partial sciatic nerve injury in rats: Evidence from anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic studies. EXCLI J. 2017;16:546–565. doi: 10.17179/excli2017-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aziz I., Che Ramli M.D., Mohd Zain N.S., Sanusi J. Behavioral and histopathological study of changes in spinal cord injured rats supplemented with spirulina platensis. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014;2014:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2014/871657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang Z., Fujiki M., Guth L., Steward O. Genetic influences on cellular reactions to spinal cord injury: A wound-healing response present in normal mice is impaired in mice carrying a mutation (Wlds) that causes delayed wallerian degeneration. J. Comp. Neurol. 1996;371:485–495. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960729)371:3&#x0003c;485::AID-CNE10&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (14.2MB, zip)

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES