Table 7.
Comparison of present sustainable/green HPTLC technique with literature analytical techniques for the simultaneous determination of CCHO and EOH.
| Analytical Method | Compound | Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCHO | EOH | ||||||
| Linearity Range | Accuracy (% Recovery) | Precision (% CV) | Linearity Range | Accuracy (% Recovery) | Precision (% CV) | ||
| GC-FID | 0.45–452 (µg mL−1) | 84–111 | 4.9–5.4 | 0.31–625 (µg mL−1) | 88–96 | 4.5–8.7 | [30] |
| HPLC | 1–200 (µg mL−1) | 99.09 | 1.35–1.63 | 0.3–12 (µg mL−1) | 99.20 | 1.43–1.61 | [31] |
| HPLC | 0.04–6.55 (µg mL−1) | 95.95–99.86 | 0.35–2.89 | 0.45–36.00 (µg mL−1) | 99.47–101.85 | 0.51–1.53 | [32] |
| HPTLC | 52.54–735.56 (ng band−1) | 98.44–99.35 | 0.66–0.64 | 533.2–8531.2 (ng band−1) | 98.25–99.32 | 0.34–1.09 | [33] |
| HPTLC | 10–2000 (ng band−1) | 98.45–101.16 | 0.52–0.88 | 10–2000 (ng band−1) | 99.32–100.84 | 0.48–0.75 | Present work |