Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2020 Oct-Dec;15(4):602–607. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v15i4.4874

The Oral Parasitic Microbiome in Hepatitis B Virus Infected Sudanese Patients with Gum Disease

Abdelhakam G TAMOMH 1,2, Mohammed A SULIMAN 2, Sabah R YOUSIF 3, Hui LIU 1,*
PMCID: PMC8039478  PMID: 33884018

Abstract

Background:

We aimed to evaluate a potential link between colonization of gingival crevices by the Entamoeba gingivalis as oral parasite microbiome and Hepatitis B infection among gum disease Sudanese patients.

Methods:

This study was conducted on 448 gum disease patients attending to Dental Clinic of Kosti Teaching Hospital, Kosti, Sudan in 2017–2018. Oral symptoms were registered in 336 patients at different stages of the HBV infection and in 112 HBV seronegative gum disease control. All participants were screened for HBV using ELISA test. Unstimulated whole saliva and gingival scraping were obtained and analyzed for the presence of the amoeba using a parasitological technique.

Results:

Statistically highly significant correlation was found between the detection of the E. gingivalis in Saliva/gingival scraping and gum illness disease with HBV-infected patients than healthy control group (P<0.05). There was high association between the occurrence of the amoeba between the two groups and smoking, snuffing habitats (P<0.05), inversely, no association with the oral personal hygiene.

Conclusion:

The presence of the amoeba was not related to the degree of gum diseases only, but to the HBV infection diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study of E. gingivalis in association with HBV infection among gum disease Sudanese patients; maybe predict the role of oral parasitic microbiome in the status of gum disease in HBV infection.

Keywords: Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Oral microbiome, Entamoeba gingivalis, Gum diseases, Sudan

Introduction

A gum disease is a public health issue, being one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. It is the second most common oral lesion after oral candidiasis (1). The main stages of gum disease are gingivitis and periodontitis. Usually gingivitis precedes periodontitis. Periodontal disease may progress painlessly, producing few clear signs, even in the late stages of the disease.

Hepatitis B is a life-threatening illness and hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma can be developed in asymptomatic carrier (25). Hepatitis B is hepatotropic virus disease, still a major health problem despite the availability of vaccination, and is a result of a host immune response and the infection is notcytopathic (6,7). The causes of gum oral lesions and recurrent ulcerations among patients infected with HBV are still unknown (8, 9). The risk for progressive extensive necrosis has been described, and the condition should, therefore, be carefully diagnosed, treated, and followed up (10). Healing of oral lesions have been difficult to achieve with a tropical treatment of a viral infection that causes host immunodeficiency (10), but uses of metronidazole has been reported to be clinically effective (8).

Entamoeba gingivalis is a protozoan parasite that belongs to the genus Entamoeba that inhabits the oral cavities. It is thought to be a commensally oral microbiome in humans. E. gingivalis amoebae was detected early in the mouth as the first symbiotic microbiome described in humans (11). It is an oral microbiome found only in its trophozoite form (12). It may be present on the teeth and gingival surface, lesions, interdentally spaces, and in pockets of gingival (13, 14). Additionally, it has been known to inhabit the bronchial mucus and tonsillar crypts. E. gingivalis can be found in 95% of people with gum disease and 50% with healthy gums as hosts. The transmission occurs directly from one person to another through kissing, sharing eating utensils, or via droplet spray.

E. gingivalis pathogenicity in the oral cavity is still not completely understood. It is presence in the patients with a good state of immunity usually does not cause pathological effects or changes (13, 15). Age, dental caries, and oral hygiene are considered important factors, which play a role in the E. gingivalis pathogenicity (14). Furthermore, the occurrence of this parasite is correlated and associated with the age of host (16). Metabolic disabilities favor gum tissues pathological changes, therefore, may influences types or species composition of protozoan, virus and or bacterial infections in patients with different systemic illnesses (17).

Screening for oral parasitic microbiome in saliva and gingival scraping has shown significant changes in the viral infection. It is rarely studied in developing countries (18). Valuable knowledge will be missed, if this parasite not screened or studied in HBV infected patients with gum disease to understand the mechanism or the role of the disease and improve public health in developing countries, this study was carried out to detect and identify E. gingivalis as an oral parasitic microbiome in whole saliva and gingival scraping specimens and to relate the prevalence of the parasite and HBV infection among gum diseases Sudanese patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Sample Collection

A hospital-based study was conducted on four hundred forty-eight gum disease patients attending to Dental Clinic of Kosti Teaching Hospital, Kosti, Sudan in 2017–2018. Overall, 336 of the patients were HBV infected patients group. Moreover, 112 cases were non-infected HBV patients as a control group. None had removable dentures. Serum, whole saliva and gingival scraping specimens were analyzed for all patients. None of all patients were receiving any medication. Smoking and snuffing habits as well as oral hygiene were registered.

Serum Sample Collection and HBV screening

Five ml of a blood sample was collected from each patient, centrifugated (500g x 5 min), and the obtained serum was used for HBV screening test, using a commercial ELISA diagnostic kit for HBsAg (Shenyang Huimin Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Shenyang, China), and followed the manufacturer’s instructions.

Saliva Sample collection and detection of the amoeba

Unstimulated whole Saliva samples were collected (19), from patients attending the dental clinic of Kosti Teaching Hospital, Kosti, Sudan. Saliva was placed in Sodium acetate formalin (SAF) fixative for analysis of E. gingivalis. Saliva fixed samples were centrifuged (500g x 5 min). The slide preparation stained by trichrome stain (20), and every slide scanned for an average of 5–15 min using one hundred oil immersion fields of the light microscope.

Gingival scraping Samples collection and detection of the amoeba

Gingival Scraping samples obtained by swab or spatula, placed in a clean, airtight container and then extracted from swab or transferred from the container for examination (21). The scrapped samples were prepared in a clean slide and fixed by absolute methanol, stained by Trichrome stain and one hundred oil immersion fields of light microscope used in an average of 5–15 minutes (19,20).

Statistical analysis

The differences between groups of subjects were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t-test, and Chi-square using Windows software for Social Sciences (SPSS 21.0) (Chicago, IL, USA). Data were considered to be statistically significant when the probability of type I error was 0.05 or less.

Ethical Approval

The patients were aware that their serum, unstimulated whole saliva and gingival scraping samples were needed for the diagnosis of the diseases, in the study using serological and parasitological methods. The research approved by the hospital Ethics Committee of Kosti Teaching Hospital, Kosti, Sudan, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and guidelines.

Results

A highly significant correlation was found between the detection of the E. gingivalis in Saliva/gingival scraping and gum illness disease in the HBV-infected and non-infected patients and the prevalence of E. gingivalis was higher among HBV-infected patients had been 178 males and 158 were females (227 of 336; 67.6%) than in non-infected HBV patients had been 59 males and 53 females (36 of 112; 32.1%), therefore, E. gingivalis was more common in gum disease patients infected with HBV, and the severity of gum disease increased in the HBV-infected patient more than control group.

The detection of E. gingivalis statistically significant between Saliva and gingival scraping in the non-infected HBV patients group. There also was a significant difference between the saliva sample and gingival scraping in the detection of E. gingivalis in the HBV infected group as shown in (Table 1).

Table 1:

The occurrence of Entamoeba gingivalis detected in gingival scraping and saliva of gum disease in between the two groups

Occurrence non-infected HBV group (n=112) Mean SD P-value HBV infected group(n=336) Mean SD P-value
On Saliva 36 1.67 .469 <0.001 227 1.32 .469 <0.001
On gingival scraping 28 1.75 .435 198 1.41 .493

The high association between the occurrence of the amoeba between the two groups and smoking habitat, and also there was a high significance between the presence of E. gingivalis and snuffing habitat among the two groups as shown in (Table 2). There was no association between oral hygiene and the presence of E. gingivalis in the two groups and the distribution of E. gingivalis in non-infected HBV patients group and HBV infected group was (23 of 112; 69 of 336 with bad hygiene) and (89 of 112; 267 of 336 with good hygiene), respectively.

Table 2:

Entamoeba gingivalis in non-infected HBV patients and HBV infected groups between smoking and suffering habitats

Occurrence Non-infected HBV patients group(n=112) HBV group(n=336) P-value
Smoker 45 64 <0.001
Non-smoker 67 272
Snuffer 28 50 0.003
Non snuffer 84 286

Discussion

E. gingivalis is a protozoan parasite, which belongs to the genus Entamoeba that inhabits the oropharynx and is thought to be a commensally oral microbiome in humans (2123), it is commonly found in cytological and histopathology specimens, and more common in patients with poor oral hygiene, bad dentition, or with immune suppression. However, the identification of oral parasites microbiome rarely studied in developing countries, especially in the relation of E. gingivalis with infectious diseases such as HBV infection. Useful information’s will be lost if the E. gingivalis not screened and detected in HBV infected patients, therefore, improve the patient health status and prognosis of the disease. Besides, HBV infection other predisposing factors such as life stress, inadequate sleep and oral bad hygiene are factors that increase the severity of gum diseases (9, 24, 25).

Our present work showed a high significant difference in the detection of E. gingivalis between Saliva and gingival scraping in the infected and non-infected HBV patients, with a high increase in detection of the amoeba among Saliva samples than gingival scraping. Saliva environment condition may be more suitable for the amoeba growth and movement than gingival tissue. Metabolic disabilities favor gum tissues pathological changes, therefore, may influences the amoeba in HBV infection (7, 15, 17). E. gingivalis is an opportunistic organism that harbored an immunocompromised host. Hepatitis b virus infection is cell-mediated immune disease result from a host immune response and not cytopathic (1, 6,7).

Our study for the first time expresses the association of gum diseases with HBV infection in Sudanese dental patients and no similar studies. E. gingivalis has been identified in present investigation, from obtained gingival scraping and Saliva specimens using the light microscopy, which is helpful and effective in developing countries for, identify E. gingivalis in diseased gingival pockets (11,21).

The role of laboratory diagnostic uniqueness is important and may have therapeutic implications: while E. gingivalis is a metronidazole susceptible parasite and metronidazole is clinically effective and safe in the treatment of orofacial parasitic infection (26). Further studies should be done to evaluate the effectiveness of metronidazole in gum illness patients infected with HBV.

Conclusion

There was a clear difference in the present detection and identification of E. gingivalis as an oral parasitic microbiome in gum diseases infected with HBV infection and non-infected HBV patients. Additionally, saliva is a sample of the best choice for the detection and identification of E. gingivalis in a clinical laboratory. To our knowledge, this is the first study of E. gingivalis in association with HBV infection among gum disease Sudanese patients; and maybe predicts patients’ health status and may explain the role of the oral parasitic microbiome in the degree of gum disease in HBV infection.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Liaoning Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 2015020277]. Deep thankful for all patients who participated in the study. We are grateful to all the staff of Dental Clinic and Clinical Laboratory Department at Kosti Teaching Hospital for their help to complete this work

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Lucht E, Evengård B, Skott J, et al. Entamoeba gingivalis in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients with periodontal disease. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27(3): 471–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang T, Cui D, Chen S, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics and S gene sequences in chronic asymptomatic HBV carriers with low-level HBsAg. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2019; 43(2):179–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haga H, Saito T, Okumoto K, et al. Incidence of development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis B virus are equivalent between genotype B and C in long term. J Viral Hepat. 2019; 26(7): 866–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu J, Wu H, Chen H. Immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Res. 2018; 48(2):119–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cao Z, Liu Y, Ma L, et al. A potent hepatitis B surface antigen response in subjects with inactive hepatitis B surface antigen carrier treated with pegylated-interferon alpha. Hepatology. 2017; 66(4):1058–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guang Y, Yuzhong L, Hui L. Establishment of an analysis model based on measurement of hepatitis B viral infection serum markers. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shimizu Y. T cell immunopathogenesis and immunotherapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(20): 2443–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saha K, Firdaus R, Santra P, et al. Recent pattern of Co-infection amongst HIV seropositive individuals in tertiary care hospital, Kolkata. Virol J. 2011;8:116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Farghaly AG, Mansour GA, Mahdy NH, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infections among patients with gingivitis and adult periodontitis: seroprevalence and public health importance. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1998;73(5–6):707–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hofer D, Hämmerle CH, Grassi M, et al. The effect of a single mechanical treatment on the subgingival microflora in patients with HIV-associated gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(3 Pt 1):180–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonner M, Amard V, Bar-Pinatel C, et al. Detection of the amoeba Entamoeba gingivalis in periodontal pockets. Parasite. 2014;21: 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Favoreto Junior S, Machado MI. Incidence, morphology and diagnostic studies of Entamoeba gingivalis, Gros, 1849. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995;28(4):379–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mielnik-Błaszczak Maria, Rzymowska Jolanta, Michałowski Artur, et al. Entamoeba gingivalis – prevalence and correlation with dental caries in children from rural and urban regions of Lublin Province, Eastern Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25(4):656–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Derda M, Hadaś E, Antczak E, et al. Incidence of Entamoeba gingivalis in the oral cavity of students. J Stoma. 2011; 64(10):784–795. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Braz-Silva PH, Magalhães MH CG, Hofman V, et al. Usefulness of oral cytopathology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Cytopathology. 2010; 21(5): 285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sarowaska J, Wojnicz D, Kaczkowski H, et al. The occurrence of Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax in patients with periodontal disease, Immunosuppression and genetic diseases. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2004;13(2):291–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chomicz L, Piekarczyk J, Starosciak B, et al. Comparative studies on the occurrence of protozoans, bacteria and fungi in the oral cavity of patients with systemic disorders. Acta Parasitologica. 2002;47(2):147–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lucht E, Biberfeld P, Linde A. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in saliva and EBV serology of HIV-1-infected persons with and without hairy leukoplakia. J Infect. 1995;31(3):189–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lucht E, Albert J, Linde A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and cytomegalovirus in saliva. J Med Virol. 1993;39(2): 156–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Flournoy DJ, McNabb SJ, Dodd ED, et al. Rapid trichrome stain. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;16(3): 573–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghabanchi J, Zibaei M, Afkar MD, et al. Prevalence of oral Entamoeba gingivalis and Trichomonas tenax in patients with periodontal disease and healthy population in Shiraz, southern Iran. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(1): 89–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.el Azzouni MZ, el Badry AM. Frequency of Entamoeba gingivalis among periodontal and patients under chemotherapy. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1994;24(3): 649–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pomowski A, Usón I, Nowakowska Z, et al. Structural insights unravel the zymogenic mechanism of the virulence factor gingipain K from Porphyromonas gingivalis, a causative agent of gum disease from the human oral microbiome. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(14):5724–5735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Löfmark S, Edlund C, Nord CE. Metronidazole is still the drug of choice for treatment of anaerobic infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50 Suppl 1:S16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mitchell DA. Metronidazole: its use in clinical dentistry. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11(3):145–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Müller M. Mode of action of metronidazole on anaerobic bacteria and protozoa. Surgery. 1983;93(1 Pt 2):165–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES