Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2021 Mar 26;2(2):100401. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100401

Metabolic analysis of mouse bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells using an extracellular flux analyzer

Kazuhito Gotoh 1,2,3,, Yurie Takata 1, Yuya Nakashima 1, Soichi Mizuguchi 1, Keishi Komori 1, Dongchon Kang 1,∗∗
PMCID: PMC8039729  PMID: 33851138

Summary

Dendritic cell (DC) maturation induced by Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists requires the activation of downstream metabolic changes. Here, we provide a detailed protocol to measure glycolysis, mitochondrial respiration, and fatty acid oxidation in mouse bone-marrow-derived DCs with the Seahorse XF24 extracellular flux (XF) analyzer. XF analysis with the Seahorse bioanalyzer has become a standard method to measure bioenergetic functions in cells, and this protocol can be adapted to other immune cells.

For complete information on using this protocol, please refer to Gotoh et al. (2018).

Subject areas: Cell biology, Cell culture, Cell isolation, Cell-based assays, Immunology, Metabolism

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Measuring energy metabolism in dendritic cells with an extracellular flux analyzer

  • Analyzing TLR-induced glycolytic changes in dendritic cells

  • Analyzing mitochondrial stress test and fatty acid oxidation in dendritic cells


Dendritic cell (DC) maturation induced by Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists requires the activation of downstream metabolic changes. Here, we provide a detailed protocol to measure glycolysis, mitochondrial respiration, and fatty acid oxidation in mouse bone marrow-derived DCs with the Seahorse XF24 extracellular flux (XF) analyzer. XF analysis with the Seahorse bioanalyzer has become a standard method to measure bioenergetic functions in cells, and this protocol can be adapted to other immune cells.

Before you begin

Immunometabolism is an emerging field of investigation at the interface between the historically distinct disciplines of immunology and metabolism (Mathis and Shoelson, 2011). Recent studies on immunometabolism in myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) provide new insights on the mechanism of the critical controllers of innate and adaptive immunity (Pearce and Everts, 2014) (O'Neill and Pearce, 2015). In particular, extracellular flux (XF) analysis has become a standard method to measure bioenergetic functions in DCs (Everts et al., 2012) (Everts et al., 2014) (Pantel et al., 2014) (Pelgrom et al., 2016).

This protocol comprises several methods to quantify the energy utilization of DCs in real-time using a Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer. The basic protocol describes a standard test with an XFe24 analyzer. If you use an XFe96 analyzer, you should adjust the number of DCs and the volume of buffer used according to the XFe96 analyzer. Please check the latest information on the Agilent website (https://www.agilent.com/en/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis) before your experiments.

In this protocol, we mainly described the analytical methods using mouse bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs). If you are using other cell types, please refer to Table 1. Although we show the number of cells that we could analyze so far in Table 1, we recommend that you consider the appropriate number of cells before starting the experiments.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: To obtain better results, it is important to seed more cells by monolayers

Table 1.

Proposed seeding densities for different cell types in an XF 24-well plate

Cells Cells/well Medium Reference
Mouse bone marrow derived dendritic cells 200,000 RPMI (Gotoh et al., 2018)
Mouse splenic dendritic cells 200,000 RPMI (Gotoh et al., 2018)
Human monocyte derived dendritic cells 200,000 RPMI n/a
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) 20,000 DMEM (Monji et al., 2016)
Mouse primary neurons 40,000 DMEM (Yagi et al., 2017)
Mouse primary oligodendrocytes 40,000 DMEM (Yagi et al., 2017)
Mouse natural killer cells 200,000 RPMI n/a
Mouse CD8 lymphocyte 800,000 RPMI n/a
Mouse peritoneal macrophages 80,000 RPMI or DMEM n/a
Mouse bone marrow derived macrophages 80,000 RPMI or DMEM n/a
Mouse bone marrow stem cells 200,000 DMEM (Gotoh et al., 2020)
Mouse bone marrow triple negative cells 200,000 DMEM (Gotoh et al., 2020)
Mouse bone marrow stroma cells 10,000 DMEM n/a
Mouse hepatocyte 40,000 DMEM n/a

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Bone marrow cell isolation

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 10010023
60 mm TC-treated Cell Culture Dish BD Biosciences Cat# 353002
15 mL Polystyrene Centrifuge Tube BD Biosciences Cat# 352095
50 mL High Clarity PP Centrifuge Tube BD Biosciences Cat# 352098
70 μm Cell Strainer BD Biosciences Cat# 352350

RBC lysis buffer

Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# A9434-500G
Trizma hydrochloride (Tris) Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# T5941-500G

mDC culture medium

mGM-CSF PeproTech Cat# 315-03
RPMI 1640 Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# R8758
Penicillin streptomycin Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 15140122
L-Glutamine Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 25030081
Non-essential amino acids Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11140076
Sodium pyruvate Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11360070
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# F0392
2-Mercaptoethanol Wako Cat# 137-06862

Purification of myeloid dendritic cell

CD11c MicroBeads UltraPure, mouse Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-125-835
BSA stock solution Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-091-376
Rinsing solution Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-091-222
LS columns Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-042-401
CD11c antibody Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-102-800

TLR ligand

LPS Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# L4524
Pam3CSK4 InvivoGen Cat# tlrl-pms
Poly(I:C) InvivoGen Cat# tlrl-pic
Imiquimod (R837) InvivoGen Cat# tlrl-imq
CpG-B oligonucleotide; tccatgacgttcctgatgct (uppercase and lowercase letters indicate bases with phosphodiester- and phosphorothioate-modified backbones) Hokkaido System Science n/a
ODN 1668 InvivoGen Cat# tlrl-1668

Seahorse assays medium

RPMI-1640 medium, without glucose and sodium bicarbonate Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# R1383
DMEM without glucose, L-glutamine, phenol red, sodium pyruvate and sodium bicarbonate Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# D5030
D-(+)-Glucose Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# G7021
Sodium pyruvate Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11360070
XF RPMI assay medium pack, pH 7.4 Agilent Technologies Cat# 103681-100
XF RPMI assay medium, pH 7.4 Agilent Technologies Cat# 103576-100
XF DMEM assay medium pack, pH 7.4 Agilent Technologies Cat# 103680-100
XF 1.0 M glucose solution Agilent Technologies Cat# 103577-100
XF 100 mM pyruvate solution Agilent Technologies Cat# 103578-100
XF 200 mM glutamine solution Agilent Technologies Cat# 103579-100

Seahorse assays

Seahorse XF24 FluxPak Agilent Technologies Cat# 100850-001
Poly-L-lysine solution 0.01% Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# P4707
Poly-D-lysine Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# P7280
Seahorse XFe96 PDL Cell Culture Plates, 6 assays Agilent Technologies Cat# 103730-100
Seahorse XFp PDL Cell Culture Miniplates Agilent Technologies Cat# 103722-100
FCCP Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# C2920
Rotenone Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# R8875
Antimycin Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# A8674
Oligomycin Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# O4876
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# D8418
Sodium palmitate Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# P9767
Bovine serum albumin Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# A7030
Etomoxir Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# E1905
2-Deoxy-D-glucose Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# D8375
Sodium palmitate Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# P9767
Bovine serum albumin fraction V Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# 3117057001
NaCl Merck (Sigma-Aldrich) Cat# S5886
Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit Agilent Technologies Cat# 103015-100
Seahorse XF Glycolytic Rate Assay Kit Agilent Technologies Cat# 103344-100
XF Palmitate Oxidation Stress Test Kit Agilent Technologies Cat# 103693-100

Materials and equipment

Buffer and medium preparation

Inline graphicTiming: 1–2 h

0.16M NH4Cl solution

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) n/a 0.16M 8.3g
dH2O n/a n/a 1000 mL
Total n/a n/a 1000 mL

0.17M Tris pH 7.65

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Trizma hydrochloride (Tris) n/a 0.17M 20.6g
dH2O n/a n/a 1000 mL
Total n/a n/a 1000 mL

RBC lysis solution (pH 7.2)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
0.16M NH4Cl solution 0.16M 0.14M 90 mL
0.17M Tris pH 7.65 0.17M 0.017M 10 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Preparation of RBC lysis solution

  • 8.3 g of Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) are dissolved. Add dH2O to bring the total volume to 1000 mL.

  • 20.6 g of Trizma hydrochloride (Tris) are dissolved. Add dH2O to bring the total volume to 1000 mL Adjust the pH with HCl and NaCl solutions to pH 7.65.

  • Mix 90 mL of 0.16M NH4Cl solution and 10 mL of 0.17M Tris pH 7.65. Adjust the pH with HCl and NaCl solutions to pH 7.2. Sterilize RBC lysis solution with Bottle Tops and Filter Units and store at 2°C–8°C.

RPMI medium (culture)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
RPMI n/a n/a 430 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum n/a 10% (v/v) 50 mL
Penicillin Streptomycin 10,000 U/mL 1% (v/v) 5 mL
L-glutamine 29.2 mg/mL 1% (v/v) 5 mL
non-essential amino acids 100× 1% (v/v) 5 mL
sodium pyruvate 100 mM 1% (v/v) 5 mL
2-mercaptoethanol 50 mM 50 μM 0.5 mL
Total n/a n/a 500 mL

MACS buffer (purification of myeloid dendritic cell)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Rinsing Solution n/a n/a 190 mL
BSA Stock Solution n/a n/a 10 mL
Total n/a n/a 200 mL

Agilent protocol XF assay medium (mitochondrial stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
XF RPMI assay medium, pH 7.4 n/a n/a 97 mL
XF 1.0 M Glucose Solution 1000 mM 10 mM 1 mL
XF 100 mM Pyruvate Solution 100 mM 1 mM 1 mL
XF 200 mM Glutamine Solution 200 mM 2 mM 1 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Note: Please check the latest information on the Agilent website (https://www.agilent.com/en/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis) before your experiments. We show the protocol of RPMI medium (https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/usermanuals/public/XF24_DAY_OF_MEDIA_PREP.pdf).

XF assay medium (glycolysis stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
XF RPMI assay medium, pH 7.4 n/a n/a 98 mL
XF 100 mM Pyruvate Solution 100 mM 1 mM 1 mL
XF 200 mM Glutamine Solution 200 mM 2 mM 1 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Preparation of the XF assay medium (glycolysis stress test)

  • Warm the assay medium to 37°C without CO2.

  • Adjust the pH with HCl and NaCl solutions to pH 7.4. Filter using polycarbonate membrane filter.

  • Keep at 37°C until ready to use without CO2.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: The value of ECAR is affected by the pH of assay medium. Therefore, to accurately measure the ECAR value, it is necessary to adjust the pH to 7.4 4 h before assay under 37°C.

Note: Please check the latest information on the Agilent website (https://www.agilent.com/en/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis) before your experiments. We show the protocol of RPMI medium (https://www.chem.agilent.com/cs/library/usermanuals/public/XF_Glycolysis_Stress_Test_Kit_User_Guide.pdf).

XF assay medium (palmitate oxidation stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
XF RPMI assay medium, pH 7.4 n/a n/a 98 mL
XF 1.0 M Glucose Solution 1000 mM 10 mM 1 mL
XF 200 mM Glutamine Solution 200 mM 2 mM 1 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Note: Please check the latest information on the Agilent website (https://www.agilent.com/en/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis) before your experiments. We show the protocol of RPMI medium (https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/flyers/public/flyer-agilent-seahorse-xf-palmitate-oxidation-stress-test-kit-cell-analysis-5994-1649en-agilent.pdf).

Our protocol XF assay medium (TLR-induced metabolic assay, mitochondrial stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
RPMI-1640 Medium, without glucose and sodium bicarbonate with L-Glutamine n/a n/a 8.4 g
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) n/a 10% (v/v) 100 mL
sodium pyruvate 100 mM 1% (v/v) 10 mL
D-(+)-Glucose n/a 1000 mg/L (w/v) 1000 mg
dH2O n/a n/a 890 mL
Total n/a n/a 1000 mL

Note: We recommend using within 4 h of medium preparation to avoid reagents degradation over the time and pH changes. In addition, we recommend warming the assay medium in a 37°C incubator without CO2 1 h before its use on cells.

Note: Because FBS contains a high amount of different unknown components, the amount of FBS may affect the result of ECAR and OCR. Depending on the results of ECAR and OCR, it should be considered to reduce the amount of FBS.

XF assay medium (Glycolysis stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
RPMI-1640 Medium, without glucose and sodium bicarbonate n/a n/a 8.4 g
Fetal Bovine Serum n/a 10% (v/v) 100 mL
sodium pyruvate 100 mM 1% (v/v) 10 mL
dH2O n/a n/a 890 mL
Total n/a n/a 1000 mL

XF assay medium (palmitate oxidation stress test)

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
RPMI-1640 Medium, without glucose and sodium bicarbonate n/a n/a 8.4 g
sodium pyruvate 100 mM 1% (v/v) 10 mL
D-(+)-Glucose n/a 1000 mg/L (w/v) 1000 mg
dH2O n/a n/a 890 mL
Total n/a n/a 1000 mL

Preparation of the XF assay medium

  • Once 8.4 g of RPMI-1640 medium powder, D-glucose, fetal bovine serum, and sodium pyruvate are dissolved, add dH20 to bring the total volume to 1000 mL.

  • Adjust the pH with HCl and NaCl solutions to pH 7.4.

  • Sterilize the cell culture media with Bottle Tops and Filter Units and store at 2°C–8°C.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Adjust pH as precisely as possible; the final pH will affect the results of ECAR data. Because glycolysis is measured by the changes in extracellular pH, the XF assay medium should not contain any buffering reagents.

Note: If you use other cells, prepare a DMEM-based medium by referring to Table 1.

Oligomycin stock

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Oligomycin n/a 10 mM 5 mg
DMSO n/a n/a 632 μL
Total n/a n/a 632 μL

FCCP stock

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
FCCP n/a 100 mM 10 mg
DMSO n/a n/a 393 μL
Total n/a n/a 393 μL

Rotenone stock

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Rotenone n/a 10 mM 5 mg
DMSO n/a n/a 1267 μL
Total n/a n/a 1267 μL

Antimycin stock

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Antimycin n/a 10 mM 5 mg
DMSO n/a n/a 393 μL
Total n/a n/a 393 μL

Preparation of palmitate (PA) + bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate

Inline graphicTiming: 1–2 h

Note: We recommend using the XF Palmitate Oxidation Stress Test Kit (Cat# 103693-100)

If you prepare PA+BSA yourself, refer Figure 1 or http://www.wklab.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Palmitate-BSA_Prep_SOP_v080624.pdf.

BSA solution

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Bovine Serum Albumin Fraction V n/a 0.34 mM 2.267 g
150 mM NaCl 150 mM 150 mM 100 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preparation of palmitate (PA) + bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate

Preparation of the BSA solution (Figure 1A)

  • Add 100 mL of 150 mM NaCl in a 250 mL glass beaker. Warm the beaker with a stir bar in a 37°C incubator.

  • Add 2.267 g of BSA to 100 mL of 150 mM NaCl in a 250 mL glass beaker. Stir until the BSA is completely dissolved.

PA solution

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
Sodium palmitate (PA) n/a 2.5 mM 30.6 mg
150 mM NaCl 150 mM 150 mM 44 mL
Total n/a n/a 44 mL

Preparation of the PA solution (Figure 1B)

  • Add 44 mL of 150 mM NaCl to a 100 mL glass beaker. Warm the beaker with a stir bar in a 70°C incubator.

  • Add 30.6 mg PA to 44 mL of 150 mM NaCl in a 100 mL glass beaker. The PA solution may appear increasingly cloudy as the temperature reaches 50–60°C but will clarify approaching 70°C. Stir until the PA is completely dissolved.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: PA is difficult to dissolve at temperatures of <50°C. Therefore, take care not to lower the PA solution's temperature to <50°C until PA binds to BSA. If PA do not conjugate to BSA, PA is not incorporated into cells. Therefore, this section is important.

PA+BSA solution

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Volume/weight
PA solution 2.5 mM (PA) 1 mM (PA) 40 mL
BSA solution 0.34 mM (BSA) 0.17 mM (BSA) 50 mL
150 mM NaCl 150 mM 150 mM 10 mL
Total n/a n/a 100 mL

Conjugating PA to BSA (Figure 1D)

Inline graphicCRITICAL: If PA do not conjugate to BSA, PA is not incorporated in DCs. Therefore, this section is important. In particular, because PA is difficult to dissolve at temperatures of <50°C, be careful the temperature of PA solution.

  • Add 50 mL of 150 mM NaCl to a 250 mL glass beaker. Warm the beaker with a stir bar in a 37°C incubator. Transfer 5 mL of the PA solution with a 10 mL pipette into a 250 mL glass beaker.

  • Add total of 40 mL of PA solution into 250 mL glass beaker in 8 batches of 5 mL each. Stir a 250 mL glass beaker at 37°C for 1 h.

  • Add 10 mL of 150 mM NaCl to a 250 mL glass beaker and adjust the final volume to 100 mL.

  • Check the solution’s pH and adjust it to pH 7.4.

  • Separate into 2–5 mL each and freeze at −20°C.

Step-by-step method details

Bone marrow cell isolation

Inline graphicTiming: 3 h

Note: Ensure that all the reagents and samples are kept on ice during the entire procedure. Perform all steps in a laminar flow hood with sterile equipment to maintain sterility.

For 2–4 whole Seahorse XF24 cell culture microplates, you will need BMDCs from one mouse.

Note: We recommend using male 6–10 week-old mice.

  • 1.

    Sterilize the dissection kit and bench area with 70% (vol/vol) ethanol spray. Euthanize the mice with CO2 or inhaled anesthetics, such as isoflurane or sevoflurane, followed by cervical dislocation.

  • 2.

    Pin down the mouse to expose its abdomen. Spray the euthanized mice with 70% (vol/vol) ethanol to sterilize its skin.

  • 3.

    Use scissors to cut along the midline of the abdomen until exposing the femurs. Remove the femurs and tibias and place them in a dish containing PBS. (Methods video S1)

  • 4.

    Remove the muscle and as much connective tissue as possible from the femurs and tibias. Place the harvested bones on a 60-mm dish filled with PBS.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: If the bone is broken or the soft tissue is inadequately removed, the number of bone marrow cells harvested may be decreased.

Methods video S1. Collect femurs and tibias from mouse (step 3)
Download video file (15.1MB, flv)

This section is shown in Methods video S2.

  • 5.

    Trim both ends of the femurs and tibias carefully using sterile scissors to expose the interior marrow shaft (Methods video S2).

  • 6.

    Use a 5 mL syringe to draw up to 5 mL of fresh culture medium. Attach a 21-gauge needle to the syringe. Hold the bone over a fresh 60-mm dish, with its narrow end pointing down. Flush the marrow out of the bone with 5 mL of PBS (Methods video S3).

Methods video S2. Trim both ends of the femurs and tibias (step 5)
Download video file (6.6MB, flv)
  • 7.

    Aspirate the marrow and the medium from the 60-mm dish and pipette up and down three times, rinsing the sides of the dish each time to disperse the marrow.

  • 8.

    Collect the cell suspension with the syringe and add the suspension to a 15 or 50 mL tube.

Optional: Pass the cell suspension through a 70-μm cell strainer to remove any remaining bone or muscle fragments.

  • 9.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 10.

    Add 1.0 mL / body of RBC lysis buffer to the cells and gently tap the tube with fingers to mix the lysis solution for 30–60 s. Add 10 mL of RPMI medium to dilute the buffer after RBC lysis.

  • 11.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: If red blood cell lysis fails, return to step 10.

  • 12.

    Resuspend the cells in 10 mL of culture medium and place on ice. Mix the cell culture medium well and count the cells; 2–6 × 107 bone marrow cells can be collected from two tibias and two femurs.

  • 13.

    Day 0: Seed 2 × 106 bone marrow cells in 2 mL of culture medium onto a 12-well culture plate with 10–25 ng/mL of GM-CSF in a 37°C and humidified 5% CO2 incubator.

Note: BMDCs can be cultured in a 60-mm dish (12 × 106 bone marrow cells/ 6 mL), a 100-mm dish (2 × 107 bone marrow cells/ 10 mL), or a 6-well dish (8 × 106 bone marrow cells/ 4 mL).

Methods video S3. Collect bone marrow cell suspension (steps 6–8)
Download video file (17.6MB, flv)

If you wish to culture plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) or macrophages, you can obtain pDCs and macrophages using Flt3 ligands or M-CSF at the same concentration as GM-CSF (Gotoh et al., 2008) (Sasaki et al., 2017).

Myeloid dendritic cell culture

Inline graphicTiming: 6–7 days

  • 14.

    Day 3, 5: Add 2 mL of culture media with 10–25 ng/mL GM-CSF and divide 1 well into 2 wells.

  • 15.

    Day 6–7: Collect the myeloid dendritic cells. We speculate that 1–3 × 107 DCs / body can be recovered.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Be careful to avoid collecting the highly adherent cells.

Important: Non-BMDCs can be eliminated by early washing steps, discarding highly adherent cells, and enriching or sorting for CD11c+ cells (Helft et al., 2015).

Note: If the culture media is not added properly, the survival rate and number of the BMDCs will be reduced.

Purification of myeloid dendritic cell

Inline graphicTiming: 2 h

Note: The percentage of CD11c+ BMDCs is approximately 60%–90%. Use the following process to obtain a more concentrated population of CD11c+ BMDCs. After this step, we speculate that 0.5–1 × 107 DCs / body can be recovered.

Note: If you will purify CD11c+ BMDCs, refer https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/DE-en/shop/comMiltenyiDatasheet/product?productId=54985.

  • 16.

    Mix the cell culture medium well and count the cells.

  • 17.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 18.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in 10 mL of MACS buffer.

  • 19.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to break up the cell pellet.

  • 20.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in 400 μL of MACS buffer per 1–2 × 10⁸ cells.

  • 21.

    Add 100 μL of CD11c MicroBeads UltraPure per 1– 2 × 10⁸ total cells.

  • 22.

    Mix well and incubate for 10 min in the dark in the refrigerator at 2°C–8°C.

  • 23.

    After incubation, add 10 mL of MACS buffer and centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min. Discard the supernatant. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 24.

    Resuspend cell pellet in 1 mL of MACS buffer.

  • 25.

    Place an LS column in the magnetic field of the MACS Separator. Add 3 mL of MACS buffer onto the LS column to rinse the column.

  • 26.

    Apply 1 mL of the cell suspension onto the column. After adding the cell suspension, wash the LS column three times with 3 mL MACS buffer each.

  • 27.

    Remove the LC column from the MACS Separator and place it on a 15 mL collection tube.

  • 28.

    Apply 5 mL of MACS buffer onto the column. Immediately flush out the CD11chigh mDCs by firmly pushing the plunger into the column.

Optional: If you use the autoMACS® Pro Separator, refer to the corresponding user’s manual on using the autoMACS® Pro Separator.

Note: After collecting the CD11chigh mDCs, we recommend checking the purity of BMDCs by flow cytometry. If you will check the purity of BMDCs, refer https://www.biolegend.com/en-us/protocols/cell-surface-flow-cytometry-staining-protocol.

Hydration of a Seahorse XFe sensor cartridge

  • 29.

    Place the assay cartridge upside down next to a 24-well utility plate. Add 1.0 mL of XF calibrant solution to each well of the 24-well utility plate.

  • 30.

    Put the cartridge back onto the utility plate and the sensor cartridge with the lid.

  • 31.

    Place it in a 37°C incubator without CO2 to hydrate for 4–48 h. To prevent evaporation of the water, verify that the incubator is properly humidified.

Note: The sensor cartridge should be hydrated for at least 4 h before assay. However, we do not recommend using an XFe sensor cartridge after >48 h of hydration.

Preparation of poly-L-lysine-coated microplates

Note: If you use non-adherent cells including BMDCs, we recommend this step. The adhesion of cells to a plate affects the accuracy of the experiment.

  • 32.

    Apply 50 μL of 0.01% poly-L-Lysine (PLL) or poly-D-Lysine (PDL) to the wells of the 24-well XF cell culture microplate. Tap the microplate to ensure that the liquid completely covers the bottom of the well.

  • 33.

    Incubate the microplate with the PLL or PDL solution for at least 5 min at room temperature.

  • 34.

    Remove the PLL or PDL solution by aspiration and thoroughly rinse the bottom of the plate with sterile water. Dry for at least 2 h before seeding cells.

Note: If you use PLL, please check this information on the Sigma Aldrich website (https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/biofiles/poly-lysine-product.html). If you use PDL, please check this information on the Sigma Aldrich website (https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/p7280?lang=en&region=US). If you use Cell Tak, please check this information on the Agilent Technologies website (https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/5991-7153EN.pdf).

Note: If you use PDL-coated cell culture microplate, you can get PDL-coated cell culture microplate (#103730-100, #103722-100) from Agilent Technologies. (https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/flyers/public/flyer-agilent-seahorse-xf-pdl-coated-cell-culture-microplates-cell-analysis-5994-1990en-agilent.pdf)

Seeding mDCs in XF24 culture microplate

  • 35.

    Collect the BMDCs into a 15 or 50 mL Falcon tube and count the cells.

  • 36.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm (800 × g) at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 37.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in XF assay medium at a density of approximately 2 × 106 /mL. Mix the cell suspension well and seed 100 μL of it on a PLL-coated 24-well XF microplate without a blank well.

Note: This protocol describes measuring oxygen consumption rates (OCR) and ECAR at 2 × 105 BMDCs/well using an XF24 analyzer. If you would like to analyze only OCR, you will obtain the results by reducing the number of mDCs used. If you would like to analyze splenic dendritic cells or plasmacytoid dendritic cells, you should seed 2–5 × 105 mDCs/well.

  • 38.

    Centrifuge the microplate for 2–5 min at 2000 rpm at room temperature to allow the cells to settle into a monolayer at the bottom of the plate.

Note: BMDCs are non-adherent cells. Therefore, to use swinging buckets or plates attach BMDCs to the bottom of the plate.

  • 39.

    Slowly add 400 μL of XF assay medium into the sample to avoid disrupting the cell monolayer. Add 500 μL of XF assay medium into the blank well. Normally, 4 wells (1A, 3C, 4B, 6D) are used as a blank well (Figure 2B).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: No cells should be placed in the blank wells.

  • 40.

    Incubate the microplate for 30–60 min at 37°C without CO2 until you are ready to load the plate onto the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: This session is critical for obtaining accurate results of the Seahorse assay. The number of cells directly affects the values of OCR and ECAR. If you seed too many cells, the cells will be seeded in multiple layers. You should observe the cells under an inverted microscope to confirm that a monolayer of cells is present in all the wells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photographs of XFe sensor cartridge and XF24 extracellular flux analyzer

XF assay

  • 41.

    Prepare 2 mL of 10× TLR agonist, mitochondrial inhibitor, or uncoupler injection solutions and an XFe sensor cartridge.

  • 42.

    Add 56–75 μL of each 10× injection solution into injection ports A, B, C, and D, respectively (Figure 2A). Return the hydration cartridge to the 37°C incubator without CO2 before setting up the run.

  • 43.

    Design a study protocol in the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer software provided by the manufacturer (Figures 3A–3D). Click the “I’m Ready” button and place the hydrated cartridge from the 37°C incubator without CO2 on the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (Figures 2B and 3E).

Note: We recommend 4 blank (Figure 3B) and 3 or more replicas wells for 1 plate.

  • 44.

    Wait for the machine to calibrate the sensors. When the calibration is finished, keep the cartridge on the machine while the calibrant plate in the load position is sent out. At this point, take the XF24 cell culture microplate from the 37°C incubator without CO2 and put it into the load position and click the “CONTINUE” button.

  • 45.

    After the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer run is finished, remove the assayed XF24 cell culture microplate, place it in a 37°C incubator to determine the cell counts or the protein concentration, and click the “CONTINUE” button to end the program.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Management of the assay protocol

(A) Open software and select a protocol.

(B) Select Blank and sample wells.

(C) Design a protocol.

(D) Check a protocol.

(E) Load a calibrant plate with compounds.

(F) Finish this assay.

After XF assay (optional)

Note: Normalization is an important component in the workflow for performing analysis of raw data to ensure accurate and consistent interpretation of results. We show a method using the number of cells. If you will use the method of normalization (e.g., using protein concentration, cell count, DNA content), refer https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/technicaloverviews/public/Methods_and_Strategies_for_Normalizing_Tech_Overview_022118.pdf

Note: If XF plate is coated with protein containing cellular adherents (e.g., collagen, laminin, Matrigel), normalization using total protein is also not applicable.

  • 46.

    Carefully remove the supernatant and add PBS 100 μL.

  • 47.

    Strip off the cells on bottom and count the cells.

  • 48.

    Standardize using Wave software.

Expected outcomes

Measuring TLR-induced metabolic changes: The binding of TLR and TLR agonists leads to rapid activation of DCs (Kawai and Akira, 2011). Activated DCs by TLR agonist, including LPS (TLR4 ligand) and CpG-DNA (TLR9 ligand), exhibit a rapid increase in glucose consumption and lactate production, as indicated by the real-time changes in extracellular acidification (ECAR) and OCR (Everts et al., 2014, Gotoh et al., 2018). DC activation is dependent on an early increase in glycolysis. Conversely, LPS and CpG-DNA do not affect the mitochondrial respiratory chain in the DCs. Imiquimod, a TLR7 agonist, also enhances glycolysis of DCs. Unlike LPS and CpG, imiquimod impairs the mitochondrial respiratory chain by binding and inhibiting the quinone oxidoreductases NQO2 (Gross et al., 2016). Figure 4 depicts ECAR and OCR measurements to detect metabolic changes by TLR stimulation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Metabolic change by TLR stimulation

Real-time changes in the ECAR and OCR of BMDCs treated with LPS (A,B), CpG (C, D), and IMQ (E, F).

Measuring post TLR stimulation changes: Several studies have also shown that immature DCs use mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) as a core metabolic process, rather than glycolysis. Conversely, mature DCs induced by TLR ligands display increased glycolysis and inactivated OXPHOS (Everts et al., 2012, Gotoh et al., 2018). Analysis can be done to measure the difference in mitochondrial and glycolytic stress between the immature and mature DCs (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

ECAR and OCR of immature and mature BMDCs

BMDCs (2 × 105 cells/well) stimulated without (immature) or with (mature) LPS (100 ng/mL) for 12 h were seeded in an XF-24 extracellular flux analyzer. The real-time OCR and ECAR were measured during the sequential treatments with a mitochondrial stress test (A: oligomycin, FCCP, antimycin-A/rotenone) and glycolysis stress test (B: Glucose, oligomycin, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG)).

Measuring fatty acid metabolism in DCs: Fatty acid oxidation has critical roles in regulating adaptive and innate immune responses (O'Neill et al., 2016). Tolerogenic and mature DCs showed substantially different levels of proteins and metabolites involved in the fatty acid oxidation (FAO) pathway (Malinarich et al., 2015) (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

OCR of BMDCs for FAO assay

Wild-type DCs (2 × 105 cells/well) pretreated with PA+BSA (A) and Etomoxir (B) for 30 min were seeded in an XF-24 extracellular flux analyzer. The real-time OCR was determined during the sequential treatments with a mitochondrial stress test (A: oligomycin, FCCP, antimycin-A/rotenone).

The individual protocols to measure each of these metabolic changes are outlined in “quantification and statistical analysis.”

Quantification and statistical analysis

Analysis of TLR-induced metabolic change

Inject port A (TLR agonist)

Port Compound Concentration of port Add to port volume (μL) Final concentration
A LPS 100 ng/mL 56 100 ng/mL
A LPS 1000 ng/mL 56 100 ng/mL
A CpG 10 μM 56 1 μM
A IMQ 50 μg/mL 56 5 μg/mL
A IMQ 250 μg/mL 56 25 μg/mL

Protocol commands

Calibrate
Equilibrate
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port A: TLR agonist (LPS, IMQ, CpG, et. al)
Mix 3 min Perform 8–12×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
End

Analysis of metabolic change after TLR stimulation

Pretreatment (DC maturation)

  • 1.

    Stimulate BMDCs with LPS (100 ng/mL) or CpG-DNA (1 μM) for at least 12 h in a 37°C and humidified 5% CO2 incubator.

  • 2.

    Collect the BMDCs into a 15- or 50-mL Falcon tube and count the cells.

  • 3.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 4.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in XF assay medium at a density of approximately 2 × 106 / mL. Mix the cell suspension and seed 100 μL of it on a PLL-coated 24-well XF microplate without a blank well.

  • 5.

    Centrifuge the microplate for 2–5 min at 2000 rpm at room temperature to allow the cells to settle into a monolayer at the bottom of the plate. Proceed by same way as for Method 37.

  • 6.

    Slowly add 400 μL of XF assay medium into the sample to avoid disrupting the cell monolayer. Add 500 μL of XF assay medium into the blank well.

  • 7.

    Incubate the microplate for 30–60 min at 37°C without CO2 until you are ready to load the plate onto the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer.

Inject port (mitochondrial stress test)

Port Compound Concentration of port (μM) Add to port volume (μL) Final concentration (μM)
A Oligomycin 2.5 56 0.25
B FCCP 40 62 4
C Rotenone+Antimycin 10 68 1

Inject port (glycolysis stress test)

Port Compound Concentration of port Add to port volume (μL) Final concentration
A Glucose 100 mM 56 10 mM
B Oligomycin 2.5 μM 62 0.25 μM
C 2-DG 500 mM 68 50 mM

Note: Because the ideal compound concentration is affected by cell type and assay medium, we recommend that a titration experiment for these compounds is performed for new cells or assay medium. If you check the ideal compound concentration of mitochondrial stress test, refer the Agilent website in p14–15 (https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/usermanuals/public/XF_Cell_Mito_Stress_Test_Kit_User_Guide.pdf).

Protocol commands (mitochondrial stress test/glycolysis stress test)

Calibrate
Equilibrate
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port A: oligomycin/glucose
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port B: FCCP/oligomycin
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port C: Rotenone+Antimycin/2-DG
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
End

Analysis of fatty acid metabolism in myeloid dendritic cells

Pretreatment (FAO assay)

  • 1.

    Collect the BMDCs into a 15 or 50 mL Falcon tube and count the cells.

  • 2.

    Centrifuge the cell suspension at 3,000× rpm at 4°C for 5 min to pellet the cells. Discard the supernatant by gently tilting the tube and pouring the media into a waste disposal beaker. Recap the tube and gently tap to disperse the cell pellet.

  • 3.

    Resuspend the cell pellet in XF assay medium at a density of approximately 2 × 106 /mL. Mix the cell suspension well and seed 100 μL of it on a PLL-coated 24-well XF microplate without a blank well.

  • 4.

    Centrifuge the microplate for 2–5 min at 2000 rpm at room temperature to allow the cells to settle into a monolayer at the bottom of the plate.

  • 5.

    Slowly add 400 μL of XF assay medium with PA (0.3 mM) +BSA (0.05 mM), BSA (0.05 mM), or 200 μM Etomoxir into the sample to avoid disrupting the cell monolayer. Add 500 μL of XF assay medium into the blank well.

  • 6.

    Incubate the microplate for 30–60 min at 37°C without CO2 until you are ready to load the plate onto the XF24 extracellular flux analyzer (Figure 6).

Note: Recently, several studies showed that Etomoxir induces Cpt1a-independent off-target effects at concentrations >10 or 100 μM (Divakaruni et al., 2018) (Raud et al., 2018). Therefore, if you want to analyze only the CPT1a-specific inhibitory effect, we recommend to analysis with Etomoxir at concentrations < 10 μM.

Inject port (mitochondrial stress test)

Port A Concentration of port A Final concentration
Oligomycin 2.5 μM 0.25 μM
Port B Concentration of port B Final concentration
FCCP 40 μM 4 μM
Port C Concentration of port C Final concentration
Rotenone+Antimycin 10 μM 1 μM

Protocol commands

Calibrate
Equilibrate
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port A: oligomycin/glucose
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port B: FCCP/oligomycin
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
Inject from port C: Rotenone+Antimycin/2-DG
Mix 3 min Perform 3×
Wait 2 min
Measure 3 min
End

XF assay analysis

Note: Agilent Seahorse Wave Desktop software is the assay design, data analysis, and file management software for all Agilent Seahorse XF Analyzers. Because the latest release of Wave Desktop software provides new analysis capabilities in a redesigned interface that will streamline your XF workflow, download from the following site. https://www.agilent.com/en/products/cell-analysis/software-download-for-wave-desktop?productURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.agilent.com%2Fen%2Fproduct%2Fcell-analysis%2Freal-time-cell-metabolic-analysis%2Fxf-software%2Fseahorse-wave-desktop-software-740897

  • 1.

    Open and view assay result file with Agilent Seahorse Wave Desktop software (Figure 7A).

  • 2.

    Normalize by the number of cells or the concentration of protein in each well (Figure 7B).

  • 3.

    Export the assay result as Microsoft Excel or GraphPad Prism file (Figure 7C).

  • 4.

    Analyze the assay results (Figures 7D and 8).

Note: Agilent Seahorse Wave Desktop software includes several programs that can automatically measure Mito Fuel Flex Test, Cell Mito Stress Test, Cell Energy Phenotype Test, Glycolytic Rate Assay, and Real-Time ATP Rate Assay (Figure 7C).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Analysis of XF assay

(A) Open software and select OCR or ECAR.

(B) Normalization of the assay.

(C) Export Excel or Prism.

(D) Printscreen of XF Mito Stress Assay.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Statistical analysis of mitochondrial stress test and glycolytic stress test

A schematic of a mitochondrial stress test (A) and glycolytic stress test (B) using the extracellular flux analyzer.

Limitations

In these protocols, we have described several analytic methods using mouse BMDCs. Because we have analyzed similar assays on various cells, we consider these protocols to be beneficial. Conversely, there are several new reagents and protocols. Therefore, when you perform analyses with a Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer, we recommend checking for new protocols at https://www.agilent.com/en/product/cell-analysis/real-time-cell-metabolic-analysis.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

RBCs are not hemolysed by RBC lysis buffer. Refer to Figure 9 (step 10).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Photograph of bone marrow pellets

Bone marrow pellet before RBC lysis (A), after RBC lysis (B).

Potential solution

  • Extend the mixing time to 60–120 s.

  • Add 2 mL / body of RBC lysis buffer to the cells.

  • Remake RBC lysis buffer.

Problem 2

Bone marrow cells are not properly differentiated into BMDCs (step 15).

Potential solution

  • Reduce the number of bone marrow cells seeded onto the culture plate.

  • Extend the culturing period of the BMDCs.

  • Increase the concentration of GM-CSF.

  • Use a different lot of fetal bovine serum.

Problem 3

The measured value of OCR or ECAR is small or lower than the sensitivity (step 45).

Potential solution

  • Check the viability of BMDCs.

  • Increase the number of BMDCs seeded into an XF24 cell culture microplate.

  • Improve the condition of the BMDCs.

  • Prepare the assay medium again.

Problem 4

ECAR does not increase after the administration of TLR agonist (step 45).

Potential solution

  • Increase or decrease the concentration of the TLR agonist.

  • ECAR may not increase in DCs whose energy metabolism has shifted from mitochondrial respiration to glycolysis by the inhibitor or genetic modification.

  • Reduce the FCS concentration to 1%–5% because FCS has some buffering capacity.

Problem 5

The value of OCR and ECAR is not stable (step 45).

Potential solution

Inline graphicCRITICAL: We recommend checking raw data for pO2 and pH.

  • Check the levels of pO2 and pH.

  • When a large number of cells are seeded in a well, an artifact of OCR may be generated due to the hypoxia. If pO2 or pH decreases over time, we recommend to reduce the number of cells or increase the rest time of assay (Gerencser et al., 2009).

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Kazuhito Gotoh (gotou.kazuhito.712@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp).

Materials availability

All reagents generated in this study are available from the lead contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.

Data and code availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the lead contact upon reasonable requests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP18K11077 and JP16K19196 to K.G. and JP20H00530 and JP17H01550 to D.K. This work was also supported by a grant from the Takeda Science Foundation, The Shin-Nihon Foundation of Advanced Medical Research, and Charitable Trust Laboratory Medicine Research Foundation of Japan (to K.G.). We would like to acknowledge all of our colleagues in Dr. Kang's and Dr. Fukui's laboratory for their support throughout this project. We thank Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

K.G. and D.K. designed the study. K.G., Y.T., Y.N., S.M., and K.K. carried out the experiments. K.G. prepared the figures. K.G. wrote the manuscript. D.K. supervised the experiments. K.G. and D.K. reviewed the experiments.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100401.

Contributor Information

Kazuhito Gotoh, Email: gotou.kazuhito.712@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

Dongchon Kang, Email: kang@cclm.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

References

  1. Divakaruni A.S., Hsieh W.Y., Minarrieta L., Duong T.N., Kim K.K.O., Desousa B.R., Andreyev A.Y., Bowman C.E., Caradonna K., Dranka B.P. Etomoxir inhibits macrophage polarization by disrupting CoA homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2018;28:490–503.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Everts B., Amiel E., Huang S.C., Smith A.M., Chang C.H., Lam W.Y., Redmann V., Freitas T.C., Blagih J., van der Windt G.J. TLR-driven early glycolytic reprogramming via the kinases TBK1-IKKvarepsilon supports the anabolic demands of dendritic cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:323–332. doi: 10.1038/ni.2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Everts B., Amiel E., van der Windt G.J., Freitas T.C., Chott R., Yarasheski K.E., Pearce E.L., Pearce E.J. Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells. Blood. 2012;120:1422–1431. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-419747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerencser A.A., Neilson A., Choi S.W., Edman U., Yadava N., Oh R.J., Ferrick D.A., Nicholls D.G., Brand M.D. Quantitative microplate-based respirometry with correction for oxygen diffusion. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:6868–6878. doi: 10.1021/ac900881z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gotoh K., Kunisaki Y., Mizuguchi S., Setoyama D., Hosokawa K., Yao H., Nakashima Y., Yagi M., Uchiumi T., Semba Y. Mitochondrial protein synthesis is essential for terminal differentiation of CD45(-) TER119(-)erythroid and lymphoid progenitors. iScience. 2020;23:101654. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gotoh K., Morisaki T., Setoyama D., Sasaki K., Yagi M., Igami K., Mizuguchi S., Uchiumi T., Fukui Y., Kang D. Mitochondrial p32/C1qbp is a critical regulator of dendritic cell metabolism and maturation. Cell Rep. 2018;25:1800–1815.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gotoh K., Tanaka Y., Nishikimi A., Inayoshi A., Enjoji M., Takayanagi R., Sasazuki T., Fukui Y. Differential requirement for DOCK2 in migration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells versus myeloid dendritic cells. Blood. 2008;111:2973–2976. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-112169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gross C.J., Mishra R., Schneider K.S., Medard G., Wettmarshausen J., Dittlein D.C., Shi H., Gorka O., Koenig P.A., Fromm S. K+ Efflux-Independent NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation by Small Molecules Targeting Mitochondria. Immunity. 2016;45:761–773. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Helft J., Bottcher J., Chakravarty P., Zelenay S., Huotari J., Schraml B.U., Goubau D., Reis e Sousa C. GM-CSF mouse bone marrow cultures comprise a heterogeneous population of CD11c(+)MHCII(+) macrophages and dendritic cells. Immunity. 2015;42:1197–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kawai T., Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011;34:637–650. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malinarich F., Duan K., Hamid R.A., Bijin A., Lin W.X., Poidinger M., Fairhurst A.M., Connolly J.E. High mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic capacity represent a metabolic phenotype of human tolerogenic dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2015;194:5174–5186. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mathis D., Shoelson S.E. Immunometabolism: an emerging frontier. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:81. doi: 10.1038/nri2922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Monji K., Uchiumi T., Hoshizawa S., Yagi M., Matsumoto T., Setoyama D., Matsushima Y., Gotoh K., Amamoto R., Kang D. Serum depletion induced cancer stem cell-like phenotype due to nitric oxide synthesis in oncogenic HRas transformed cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:75221–75234. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Neill L.A., Kishton R.J., Rathmell J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:553–565. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Neill L.A., Pearce E.J. Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J. Exp. Med. 2015;213:15–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pantel A., Teixeira A., Haddad E., Wood E.G., Steinman R.M., Longhi M.P. Direct type I IFN but not MDA5/TLR3 activation of dendritic cells is required for maturation and metabolic shift to glycolysis after poly IC stimulation. PLoS Biol. 2014;12:e1001759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pearce E.J., Everts B. Dendritic cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;15:18–29. doi: 10.1038/nri3771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pelgrom L.R., van der Ham A.J., Everts B. Analysis of TLR-induced metabolic changes in dendritic cells using the seahorse XF(e)96 extracellular flux analyzer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1390:273–285. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3335-8_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raud B., Roy D.G., Divakaruni A.S., Tarasenko T.N., Franke R., Ma E.H., Samborska B., Hsieh W.Y., Wong A.H., Stuve P. Etomoxir actions on regulatory and memory T cells are independent of Cpt1a-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Cell Metab. 2018;28:504–515.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sasaki K., Gotoh K., Miake S., Setoyama D., Yagi M., Igami K., Uchiumi T., Kang D. p32 is required for appropriate interleukin-6 production upon LPS stimulation and protects mice from endotoxin shock. EBioMedicine. 2017;20:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yagi M., Uchiumi T., Sagata N., Setoyama D., Amamoto R., Matsushima Y., Kang D. Neural-specific deletion of mitochondrial p32/C1qbp leads to leukoencephalopathy due to undifferentiated oligodendrocyte and axon degeneration. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15414-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Methods video S1. Collect femurs and tibias from mouse (step 3)
Download video file (15.1MB, flv)
Methods video S2. Trim both ends of the femurs and tibias (step 5)
Download video file (6.6MB, flv)
Methods video S3. Collect bone marrow cell suspension (steps 6–8)
Download video file (17.6MB, flv)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the lead contact upon reasonable requests.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES