Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Mar 31;15(3):e0009141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009141

High variation in immune responses and parasite phenotypes in naturally acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a captive non-human primate breeding colony in Texas, USA

Angel M Padilla 1,#, Phil Y Yao 1,#, Tre J Landry 1, Gretchen M Cooley 1, Susan M Mahaney 2, Isabela Ribeiro 3, John L VandeBerg 2, Rick L Tarleton 1,*
Editor: Barbara A Burleigh4
PMCID: PMC8041201  PMID: 33788859

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of human Chagas disease, is endemic to the southern region of the United States where it routinely infects many host species. The indoor/outdoor housing configuration used in many non-human primate research and breeding facilities in the southern of the USA provides the opportunity for infection by T. cruzi and thus provides source material for in-depth investigation of host and parasite dynamics in a natural host species under highly controlled and restricted conditions. For cynomolgus macaques housed at such a facility, we used a combination of serial blood quantitative PCR (qPCR) and hemoculture to confirm infection in >92% of seropositive animals, although each method alone failed to detect infection in >20% of cases. Parasite isolates obtained from 43 of the 64 seropositive macaques were of 2 broad genetic types (discrete typing units, (DTU’s) I and IV); both within and between these DTU groupings, isolates displayed a wide variation in growth characteristics and virulence, elicited host immune responses, and susceptibility to drug treatment in a mouse model. Likewise, the macaques displayed a diversity in T cell and antibody response profiles that rarely correlated with parasite DTU type, minimum length of infection, or age of the primate. This study reveals the complexity of infection dynamics, parasite phenotypes, and immune response patterns that can occur in a primate group, despite being housed in a uniform environment at a single location, and the limited time period over which the T. cruzi infections were established.

Author summary

We evaluated naturally occurring infections of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of human Chagas disease, in an indoor/outdoor primate colony at a breeding facility in Texas, USA. Using serial quantitative PCR and hemoculture, we confirmed infection in 92% of the 64 seropositive animals, but neither of these two methods confirmed more than 80% of the cases. Parasites by hemoculture fell into two genetic groups (discrete typing units I and IV), and displayed large variation in growth characteristics, elicited cellular and humoral immune responses as well as virulence and drug susceptibility when tested in mice. EKG abnormalities were found in 13 out of 51 qPCR-positive macaques. Our results demonstrate the complexity of these infection parameters in this colony in spite of the uniform and geographically constrained housing conditions of the macaques.

Introduction

Trypanosoma cruzi is the agent of human Chagas disease, the highest impact parasitic disease in the Americas, affecting 10–20 million individuals. Although T. cruzi infection has been studied for over a century in its numerous mammalian hosts, including humans, there remain many unanswered questions and misconceptions concerning the factors that determine the control of the infection and the progression and severity of, and the tissues affected by, the disease. Irrespective of the host species, T. cruzi is nearly always a persistent infection and disease development is progressive in the absence of effective treatment. Although such treatments exist, few individuals benefit from them for a variety of reasons, including the justifiable concerns of side effects, the documented failure in some cases to cure the infection and the shortage of drugs [14]. The misconceptions surrounding T. cruzi infection and Chagas disease emanate in part from the largely anecdotal nature of investigations of human infections, the remarkable genetic variability among individual isolates of T. cruzi, and the limited number of these genetic variants that have been extensively studied in naturally infected hosts, especially humans.

Natural transmission of T. cruzi in humans and domestic animals remains a significant problem in many countries in Latin America and is a growing concern in the southern United States of America [57]. T. cruzi and insect species that can vector the infection have likely been present in the USA for at least thousands of years [8] and occasional transmission to humans living exclusively in the USA has been documented [912]. In contrast to humans, domestic and other animals are quite frequently reported to acquire T. cruzi infection, almost certainly via infected insect vectors [1317]. Included among the animals known to be commonly infected with T. cruzi in the USA are non-human primates maintained in breeding and research colonies and in zoological settings. The identification of a large cohort of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) with naturally acquired T. cruzi infection at the Southwest National Primate Research Center (SNPRC) provided a unique opportunity to study, in a relatively large primate population, the parasitological and immunological parameters associated with the infection and disease.

Herein we report results obtained from a large colony of primate hosts infected with T. cruzi via natural environmental exposure and provide the first comprehensive immunological and pathological analysis in conjunction with genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the parasites isolated from these hosts. The study reveals multiple genotypes and a very broad range of phenotypes among parasites isolated from hosts infected in a single, clustered set of housing units. However, the data revealed no association between specific patterns of host immune responses or disease with specific parasite genotypes or phenotypes.

Results

Study group

Previous studies documented T. cruzi infection among non-human primates housed in outdoor enclosures at the SNPRC where they may have acquired the infection by ingesting infected insects [18,19]. In this study, 64 cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) of both sexes with positive conventional serology for T. cruzi infection were studied. The average age of the animals was 12 years (range 7–22 years) and they were estimated to have been infected a minimum average of approximately 6.4 years (range 1.5–8.5 years; S1 Fig).

qPCR and hemoculture of serial blood samples failed to detect infection in all seropositive macaques

qPCR was performed on blood samples from the 64 seropositive macaques on up to three different time points over a 3-month period during the spring-summer seasons. This serial qPCR approach yielded a positive result in at least one sample for 51 animals (80%). Out of the 61 animals sampled at least twice, 26 had both samples positive and 22 had only one sample positive. Testing for a third time confirmed the PCR positive result in 7 of 16 animals and detected T. cruzi DNA in the blood of 2 of the 13 animals previously testing negative. Cumulatively, for PCR positive animals screened more than once, 83 of those 129 tests (64%) were positive.

For further detection of infection and isolation of parasites from the animals, the red blood cell fraction of whole blood (after the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) over Ficoll) was cultured and resulted in detectable parasite growth and further cultivation of T. cruzi isolates from 43 of the seropositive animals (67%). Qualitative PCR of the hemocultures that lacked visible parasite growth identified 8 additional T. cruzi positive hemocultures, bringing the overall detection level for the hemoculture technique to 51 out of 64 samples (80%). Notably, 8 of the 13 consistently qPCR negative, seropositive animals yielded a positive hemoculture with the isolation of viable parasites. The combination of serial qPCR and hemoculture/PCR confirmed T. cruzi infection in a total of 59 out of 64 seropositive macaques (92%; Fig 1A). Not surprisingly, blood samples that yielded a positive hemoculture/PCR had on average a higher parasite equivalent per ml value in the qPCR than those that were negative by hemoculture (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Serial qPCR and hemoculture confirmed T.

Fig 1

cruzi infection in 92% of seropositive macaques. (A) Study group. Peripheral blood samples from 64 macaques positive for T. cruzi infection by conventional serology were screened by serial qPCR and hemoculture performed as described in Materials and Methods. Serologically positive macaques were confirmed by blood qPCR (qPCR), visible parasites in hemocultures (Hemoculture) and by qualitative PCR in hemocultures without visible parasites (culture/PCR). (B) Parasite load in blood determined by serial qPCR versus presence or absence of parasite growth in macaque hemocultures. Hemocultures designated positive (Hem+) showed parasite growth or qualitative PCR+ in the culture. Blood samples were analyzed by qPCR at up to three time points, and the mean value of T. cruzi equivalents per ml in all the samples for each individual macaque was calculated. Each symbol represents an individual macaque (n = 64). * indicates P<0.05 as determined by Mann Whitney test.

T. cruzi-infected macaques display robust T cell and antibody responses

To further assess the strength and breadth of the antibody responses to T. cruzi in these macaques, plasma samples were screened against a panel of 9 recombinant T. cruzi proteins as well as a trypomastigote/amastigote lysate using a bead-based multiplex platform [20,21]. All the macaques had high levels of IgG antibodies reactive with the T. cruzi lysate which modestly correlated (rs = 0.26; p = 0.04) with parasite loads in blood as determined by qPCR (Fig 2A). As previously demonstrated in humans [20,21] and canines [22] each animal had a distinct profile of antibodies against the antigen panel (Fig 2B). The most frequently detected proteins were the 60S acidic ribosomal subunit protein and a TolT surface protein which were recognized by 77% and 55% of the macaques, respectively (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. T. cruzi infected macaques display high levels of specific antibodies against parasite antigens.

Fig 2

(A) Reactivity of macaque sera against T. cruzi lysate is displayed on the X-axis as median fluorescence intensity (MFI) in a multiplex assay and related on the Y-axis to mean parasite load in blood determined by serial qPCR. Each symbol represents an individual macaque (n = 64). (B) Reactivity against 9 recombinant T. cruzi proteins. Each bar represents the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) to the specific antigen. Individual macaques are referred by their identification number on the X axes and the genotype of the parasites isolated from that macaque are noted. T. cruzi lysate and green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used as positive and negative controls respectively. Graphs are representative of macaques with weak (top), intermediate (middle), and strong (bottom) reactivity against the recombinant proteins. ND: no parasites were obtained by hemoculture to allow genotyping. (C) Percentage of macaques with a median fluorescence intensity above the negative control (GFP) for each T. cruzi recombinant protein. rs: Spearman’s correlation coefficient; *p<0.05.

All the infected macaques exhibited IFN-gamma-producing cells in response to a parasite lysate and the frequency of responding T cells correlated with their respective antibody responses (Fig 3A) but not with the parasite load (as determined by qPCR; Fig 3B). T cell responses to a pool of macaque CMV peptides were also monitored to assess overall immune competence (as in humans, CMV infection is common in these primates). Although macaque samples displayed a wide range of T cell responsiveness to the CMV peptides, this response did not correlate with the cellular response against T. cruzi lysate, suggesting that there was not an immunosuppressive effect induced by either T. cruzi or CMV that influenced cellular immune responses in general (Fig 3C).

Fig 3. Infected macaques display a variable T cell response against T. cruzi lysate.

Fig 3

(A) Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from seropositive macaques were stimulated overnight with T. cruzi lysate and the IFNg response was measured by ELISpot. (A) Cellular and antibody response against T. cruzi lysate for individual macaques. (B) Cellular response against T. cruzi lysate plotted against the parasite load in blood determined by serial qPCR. (C) The cellular response against T. cruzi lysate was compared to the cellular response against cytomegalovirus peptides measured by ELISpot on PBMCs from the same blood sample of individual macaques. rs: Spearman’s correlation coefficient; *p<0.05. (n = 64).

In human T. cruzi infection, the intensity and quality of anti-parasite T cell responses decrease with the apparent length of infection in a phenomenon described as T cell exhaustion [23]. However, in this group of infected macaques, a correlation between the strength of the cellular (Fig 4A) or antibody (Fig 4B and 4C) response with the duration of infection was not evident. Similarly, there was not a clear relationship between parasite load in blood by qPCR and the minimum length of the infection (Fig 4D).

Fig 4. Minimum length of infection in macaques does not modify immunological and parasitological parameters.

Fig 4

Cellular (A) and humoral (C) responses against T. cruzi lysate for macaques displaying diverse minimum lengths of infection. (B) Number of recombinant T. cruzi antigens recognized by macaques infected for different periods of time measured by multiplex assay. (D) Parasite load in macaque blood determined by serial qPCR. (n = 50).

Collectively, these immunological analyses document that humoral and cellular immune responses were detected in all study subjects, but that these responses vary greatly in strength and breadth. However, these differences do not appear related to the minimum length of infection and only the antibody response to a T. cruzi lysate correlated with the apparent parasite load as assessed by blood qPCR.

T. cruzi infected macaques display low levels of early differentiated (CD45RA-CD27+CD28+) and high levels of late differentiated (CD45RA-CD27-CD28-) memory CD8+ T cells

Chronically chagasic patients have been documented to have altered T cell populations consistent with long-term stimulation due to persistent infection [24]. To determine if similar alterations in the overall peripheral T cell populations were present in nonhuman primates with long-term T. cruzi infections, we analyzed the different lymphocyte populations in peripheral blood samples of infected animals and compared them with a small group of seronegative macaques from the same colony. Infected animals displayed on average a slightly higher proportion of T effector memory cells (CD28-CD95+) and a lower proportion of naive T cells (CD28+CD95-) relative to non-infected controls in both the CD8+ and CD4+ populations (Fig 5A). Infected animals also displayed a higher proportion of fully differentiated memory (CD45RA-CD27-CD28-) and lower levels of early differentiated memory (CD45RA-CD27+CD28+) CD8+ T cells than non-infected macaques (Fig 5B). A higher proportion of fully differentiated memory CD4+ T cells was also evident in the infected animals. Thus, the phenotype of the T cell populations reflects T. cruzi infection status of the macaques.

Fig 5. Phenotype of T cell subpopulation reflects the infected status of seropositive macaques.

Fig 5

Peripheral blood samples were stained for cell surface markers and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) CD8+ and CD4+ T cell populations were subdivided into naive, T central memory (Tcm) and T effector memory (Tem) subpopulations based on the expression of CD28 and CD95. Naiv inf: naive T cells in infected macaques, Naiv non inf: naive T cells in non-infected macaques, Tem inf: T effector memory cells in infected macaques, Tem non inf: T effector memory cells in non-infected macaques. (B) Early differentiated T cells (CD45RA-CD28+CD27+) and fully differentiated T cells (CD45RA-CD28-CD27-) subpopulations were identified inside CD8+ and CD4+ T cell populations for non-infected (non inf; n = 5) and infected (infect; n = 62) macaques. Representative dot plots of infected macaques are shown. Numbers in the dot plots indicate the percentage of events in the gate or quadrant out of the displayed population. * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01 by Mann Whitney test.

Parasite isolates from infected macaques exhibit significant genetic and phenotypic variation

Genetic characterization of T. cruzi isolates from the macaques showed two of the possible 6 genetic lineages previously described in T. cruzi [25], TcI and TcIV, with a higher proportion of the former. A genetic pattern corresponding to a mixed infection of both lineages was clearly evident in one animal (Fig 6A). On average, macaques infected with parasites of the TcIV lineage displayed a slightly higher cellular and antibody response against T. cruzi lysate (Fig 6B and 6C) although there were no differences in the parasite levels in blood or in the duration of infection between the groups of macaques infected with one or the other lineage (S2 Fig). Parasite lineage also did not track with the diversity or strength of antibody responses (Fig 2B).

Fig 6. T. cruzi parasites isolated from macaques belong to TcI and TcIV lineages.

Fig 6

Parasite isolates were recovered by hemoculture of red blood cell pellets after PBMC separation by ficoll-hypaque. (A) Representative electrophoresis gel showing macaque isolate genotyping by PCR. TcI and TcIV lineages are identified by a 400 bp and 350 bp band, respectively. Lanes 1 and 14: ladder; lanes 2–6 and 9–13: macaque isolates; lanes 7 and 8: TcI and TcIV reference strains. Note the presence of a macaque with a mixed infection by both genotypes in lane 4. T cell (B) and antibody (C) responses of the macaques infected with parasites belonging to TcIV and TcI lineages. Filled circles: TcIV (n = 6), empty circles: TcI (n = 33), divided circle: isolate with mixed TcI and TcIV genotype (n = 1); ** = p<0.01; ns: nonsignificant by Mann Whitney test.

To further explore the range of phenotypes in parasites isolated from animals naturally infected in this single housing complex, we infected both C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and mice genetically deficient in interferon-γ production (IFNγ-KO) with subsets of the isolates. All of these isolates converted from epimastigotes into infective metacyclic trypomastigotes in triatomine artificial urine (TAU) media and all successfully established infections in mice. All WT mice survived acute infection with 106 metacyclic trypomastigotes from 8 isolates, and maintained persistent infections as demonstrated by the detection of T. cruzi microsatellite DNA at a range of levels in skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle, and adipose tissues at 120–150 days post-infection (dpi; Fig 7A). Infections in IFN-γ KO mice revealed a wide range of infection intensity among the isolates from macaques (Fig 7B). The majority of the IFN-γ KO mice succumbed to infection by 21 days, however mice infected with some of the isolates survived to ~60 dpi, and IFN-γ KO mice infected with isolate 20392 survived > 90 dpi.

Fig 7. T. cruzi isolates from macaques display a wide phenotypic variation in mice.

Fig 7

(A) T. cruzi DNA detection in tissues of C57BL/6 mice infected per os (p.o.) with 106 metacyclic trypomastigotes from 8 macaque isolates at 120–150 days post-infection. (B) Survival curve of IFNg-KO mice infected intraperitoneally with 106 metacyclic trypomastigotes from macaque T. cruzi isolates (n = 3 mice per isolate). (C) Frequency of CD8+ T cells in blood specific for the immunodominant T. cruzi-TSKb20 epitope in C57BL/6 mice orally infected with macaque isolates. (D) Percentage of infected C57BL/6 mice cured after benznidazole treatment, determined by qPCR of skeletal muscle following immunosuppression (n = 4–5 per isolate). DTU: TcI (black), TcIV (blue), or TcI+TcIV (red).

We also measured the ability of isolates to induce peripheral blood CD8+ T cells specific for the immunodominant CD8+ T cell epitope TSKb20, a response we had previously shown to vary depending on the infecting parasite strain [26]. Fig 7C shows that all isolates tested elicited TSKb20-specific T cells although the frequencies observed at 4 weeks post-infection ranged widely.

Lastly, to assess the susceptibility of the isolates to benznidazole (BNZ) treatment, C57BL/6J WT mice were infected, BNZ-treated beginning at ~30 dpi and then immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide to determine the effectiveness of treatment, as previously described [27]. In 11 of the 16 isolates, BNZ treatment resulted in 100% cure (Fig 7D). However, mice infected with isolates 20202, 20288, 20290, 20349, or 20566 showed a number of treatment failures, similar to what has been reported with other more “benznidazole-resistant” T. cruzi lines [27].

A proportion of infected macaques displayed EKG abnormalities and a poor health status

The 51 qPCR positive macaques were screened for EKG abnormalities and 26% had at least one detectable abnormality with 3 animals displaying 2 different abnormalities (Table 1). The most prevalent cardiac problems were: left anterior fascicular block, sinus bradycardia and complete right bundle branch block. Notably, these same abnormalities are common in human chagasic heart disease [28, 29]. There was no association between parasitological or immunological parameters and the presence of disease (Table 1). Additionally, a small proportion of the animals with a normal EKG profile displayed other health conditions (e.g. heart murmur or “dull sounds”). When clustered in three different groups: no symptoms, poor health and cardiac abnormality (Fig 8), the group of macaques with cardiac problems showed significantly higher antibody responses to T. cruzi lysate compared to the group without evident symptoms, while this trend was not statistically significant for the cellular immune response. Additionally, no correlations were observed between the parasite load in blood or minimum length of infection with health status (S3 Fig).

Table 1. Parasitological and immunological parameters in macaques displaying cardiac anomalies.

Cardiac anomalya
positive negative
qPCR (Par Eq/ml) 7.2 (0.01–55.5) 13.9 (0.02–228.0)
ELISpot (Counts/4x10e5 cells) 472.1 (42.2–911.0) 306.0 (50.8–554.8)
Serology (MFI) 19477.1 (17613.5–22772.0) 16484.9 (78.5–20321.5)
Hemocultureb 69.0% (9/13) 68.0% (26/38)
Length of infection (years) 6.3 (4.7–8.5) 6.4 (1.5–8.5)
Age (years) 11.7 (7.9–20.4) 12.0 (8.4–17.4)

a Numbers indicates the average and the range in parenthesis.

b For hemocultures the number indicates the percentage of positive and in parenthesis the number of positive cultures out of the total.

Fig 8. Macaques with cardiac anomalies show a higher antibody response.

Fig 8

Comparison of antibody (A) and T cell responses (B) against T. cruzi lysate in seropositive macaques grouped in: animals displaying no symptoms (no symptom; n = 28), poor general health condition (poor health; n = 9) or cardiac anomalies (cardiac anom; n = 13). ** = p<0.01 by Mann Whitney test.

Discussion

T. cruzi infects an extremely wide range of mammalian hosts, in addition to humans, and has been studied primarily in experimentally infected rodents and occasionally other animals. A number of case reports have documented naturally acquired T. cruzi in non-human primates and a few additional studies have followed infection of small numbers of experimentally infected non-human primates [3032]. However, to our knowledge the current study is the first to provide an in-depth study of a primate population naturally and chronically infected with T. cruzi in a restricted geographical setting where both a characterization of the parasites involved, and the immunological and clinical status of the hosts, have been examined. Indeed, this level of examination of both parasite and host factors in a defined population of T. cruzi-infected hosts has not been conducted in any species, including humans. Thus, this situation of locally acquired, chronic infection in a large number of primates offered a unique research opportunity.

Despite the fact that all animals in this study had acquired T. cruzi infection in this highly restricted area, there is considerable parasitological and immunological variation in the infections. At least two genetic lineages of T. cruzi, TcI and TcIV, circulate in this setting, however, neither the antibody response, the cardiac health of the macaques, or the parasite load in these animals was associated with the parasite DTU. Furthermore, additional analyses of the parasite lines obtained from these macaques demonstrated that isolates from different animals, but of the same DTU, vary dramatically with respect to induced CD8+ T cell responses and virulence in mice and in relative susceptibility to the anti-T. cruzi drug benznidazole. This result contrasts rather strikingly with the suggestions from other studies that the T. cruzi DTU determines critical factors about the course and severity of infection, immune response to T. cruzi, and disease status [33,34]. It is noteworthy that none of these previous studies compared these parameters among so many isolates collected from such a geographically restricted site as in the current study. These results suggest at a minimum that the parasites of the same DTU and circulating in a narrowly restricted locale have a wide potential with respect to infection outcome. The results of this study indicate that one should expect similar or greater diversity among parasites of the same DTU infecting humans, even in highly constrained geographic settings.

Both of the major genetic lineages of T. cruzi previously obtained from hosts in North America were also found in this macaque population and at least one animal had a mixed genotype infection. This latter finding is not unique to this study [35] and indicates either simultaneous transmission of 2 isolates in a single infection episode or more likely, the superinfection of an already infected host (as previously documented in other host species; [36,37]. The finding of a significant population of macaques with naturally acquired T. cruzi infection in Texas reconfirms the existence of a highly active transmission cycle in the United States as well as the diversity and potentially high parasitemia- and disease- generating capacity of parasite isolates circulating in North America. These findings also reinforce the importance of active surveillance for autochthonous cases in humans and particularly in domestic animals in the USA.

In addition to parasite genetics, host genetic factors and the evolving immune responses in infected hosts also contribute to the pattern of infection and disease in T. cruzi infection. The health status and infection-related pathology in this group of macaques correlated with the antibody response against a T. cruzi lysate (Fig 8). Considering the statistically significant association between the antibody responses and parasite levels in blood across the entire group of macaques (Fig 2), it is tempting to link higher parasite load to poorer health status. However, this direct association was not found (S3 Fig), nor were there statistically significant associations between blood parasite levels, cellular immune parameters and disease presentation. Thus, as expected, the ability of hosts to rigorously restrict parasite levels and also to limit clinical disease is more complicated than can be divined from simply the parasite genotype or from the measurement of numerous, but still quite limited, immune responses at a single point in the infection and in a limited sample of animals with modest disease symptoms overall. These results suggest that caution should also be exercised in drawing broad conclusions about the specific roles of parasite genotypes and general host immune responses with respect to infection/disease outcomes, particularly when based on a relatively small numbers of samples collected over vast geographic areas.

This study also reemphasizes the limitations of available methods for assessing the T. cruzi infection status in chronically exposed hosts. Prior exposure to T. cruzi infection can generally be documented by serological assays. However, the scarcity of parasites in chronically infected hosts as well as the immunological memory of that exposure, as demonstrated by the maintenance of sustained high antibody titers, makes determination of active infection–and therefore assessment of spontaneous or drug-induced cure in T. cruzi infection–extremely difficult. This situation is the major impediment to the wider use of current therapeutics and the assessment of newly developed ones. PCR is considered to be among the most sensitive of techniques for detection of active infection through the amplification of T. cruzi DNA from blood. In this study, the combined analysis by serology, qPCR and hemoculture at 1–3 sampling points over several months again confirmed the inadequacies of parasite detection methods in documenting active infection. Despite analysis of serial bleeds over time, qPCR failed to confirm the infection in some known seropositive animals, including in animals in which parasites were recovered by hemoculture. Thus, despite the powerful amplifying capabilities of qPCR, the low level of parasites in the blood of chronically infected hosts make this technique inadequate for dependable detection of infection or for assessment of infection cure–even when samples are obtained serially over several months. This result strongly suggests that serial qPCR cannot be used as single technique to confirm the infection in scenarios with low parasite levels in blood.

Recovery of parasites from the cultures of red blood cell pellets was surprisingly robust and this protocol could be useful for obtaining parasite isolates from human subjects donating PBMC for immunological studies. Even so, the detection of parasite DNA in hemocultures without parasite growth and the lack of parasite isolation in some qPCR-positive animals shows the limitations of this technique as well. A high positive proportion of hemoculture has also been reported in particular cases of human infection [38]. Although the combination of hemoculture and qPCR confirmed the presence of parasites in the blood of almost all the seropositive macaques studied, the failure of these parasitological techniques emphasizes again the very low level of parasites in the chronic phase of T. cruzi infection and the stochastic nature of the techniques to reveal infection, as well as the need to complement infection detection by other methods, including immunological ones. In this regard, nearly all the macaques in the study group displayed a strong antibody response against a parasite lysate and one or more recombinant proteins assays by the multiplex assay, as well as a strong cellular response to T. cruzi antigens. Additionally, the proportions of lymphocyte sub-populations reflected the infected status of the animals although with a less strong correlation than has been reported in human patients [24]. Interestingly, infected macaques did not display evidence of T cell exhaustion as described in chronic human patients [39,40] possibly due to the relatively shorter duration of infection of these macaques compared to chronically infected humans previously assessed. Similar findings have been reported in shorter-length human infections (in children) [24].

Collectively, this study highlights the unique and high quality resource that primates with naturally acquired T. cruzi infection in the southern of the USA offer for enhanced understanding of Chagas disease, and for further evaluation of techniques for such studies in humans. Perhaps not surprisingly, the results also emphasize the biological complexities of this infection, including host-parasite interactions, and reinforce the known high variation in infection and disease potential of T. cruzi, even in a confined geographical space. In addition to the obvious applications of this resource for e.g. testing of new therapeutics, captive non-human primate colonies housed outdoors in some parts of the southern USA provide a unique opportunity to better understand the scope of genetic variation and evolution of T. cruzi, and the frequency and consequences of genetic exchange in T. cruzi [4143] under accessible, highly controlled but otherwise natural infection conditions.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The procedures for maintaining the macaques and blood sampling were approved (#1050MF) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute, the host institution for the SNPRC. All procedures with mice were performed in conformance with protocols and standards approved by the University of Georgia Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under animal use protocol #A2012 05-003-R2.

Macaques, blood collection, and EKG

The macaques were housed in mixed-sex breeding groups in indoor/outdoor enclosures constructed of metal, concrete, and cyclone fencing at the SNPRC. The animals were permitted to access both indoor and outdoor portions of the housing. Prior to the initial blood draw, the housing was enclosed with a mesh and the doors were sealed to prevent entry of triatomines, in order to ensure that reinfection did not occur after the initiation of the study. The enclosures contained enrichment devices. Blood was drawn from a saphenous vein after immobilization of the animal by intra-muscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) and valium (5mg), along with inhalation of isoflurane (1.5%). Twelve-lead EKG was performed on the 51 qPCR positive macaques as described by Zabalgoitea et al. [44]. The animal facilities were accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International at the SNPRC.

Conventional serology

Serum samples collected from cynomolgus macaques over a period of 7 years were assessed by conventional serology to identify individuals with antibodies against T. cruzi. Many of the macaques were sampled and tested at two or more time points, enabling approximate dates of seroconversion from negative to positive to be established. Two assay methods were applied to each sample at each time point. One method was an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgG. Depending on availability at any given time point, the ELISA kits were obtained from one or another of two sources: Bio-Manguinhos (Ministry of Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), and IVD Research, Inc., Carlsbad, CA. The second method in the earlier stages of screening was an indirect immuno-fluorescence assay (IFA) (Bio-Manguinhos) that detects IgG and IgM. That method was replaced by an immuno-chromatographic assay, Chagas Stat-Pak (Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Medford, NY), which detects antibodies directed against several T. cruzi recombinant antigens. A sample was designated as positive only if both methods gave positive results. There was a high concordance of results among all four of the assays.

qPCR for T. cruzi in macaque whole blood samples

Whole blood collected in Na2 EDTA tubes was mixed with an equal volume of lysis buffer (6.0M guanidine, 0.2M EDTA, pH = 8.0), and the resultant GE-Blood mixture (GEB) was incubated overnight at room temperature, followed by storage at 4°C. High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) was used to extract DNA from 300 μl of GEB, to which had been added 200 pg of an internal amplification control (IAC, a linearized pZErO plasmid containing a sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana; provided by Dr. Alejandro Schijman), as described by Duffy et al. [45,46]. For construction of a standard curve, non-infected monkey blood was spiked with cultured TcI epimastigotes to a concentration of 106 parasite eq/ml, mixed with lysis buffer and IAC, and extracted as described above. Tenfold dilutions of this extract down to a concentration of 1 parasite eq/ml, followed by a 2-fold dilution to a concentration of 0.5 parasite eq/ml, were used to construct the standard curve for the quantification of parasites in each sample. Multiplex TaqMan real-time detection of T. cruzi satellite DNA and IAC targets was performed using primer and probe sequences and concentrations, and cycling parameters, in Duffy et al. [46]. Five μl of isolated DNA was analyzed in triplicate using FastStart Universal Probe Master (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis) in a final reaction volume of 20 μl. Amplifications were carried out in an ABI 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The Tukey method [47] was used to assess the triplicate IAC Ct values obtained from all the samples in each PCR run. If all three replicates of a PCR sample had IAC outliers, as occurred for three of the samples, then the sample was re-extracted and the qPCR procedure was repeated. For all other samples, values with IAC outliers (if any) were discarded, and the mean of the remaining values was recorded as the number of parasite eq/ml. This qPCR method was validated in consultation with Dr. Alejandro Schijman’s laboratory (INGEBI-CONICET, Argentina) for precision estimates, anticipated reportable range (105 to 0.5 parasite eq/mL), limit of quantification (LOQ) (2.46 parasite eq/mL), and limit of detection (LOD) (0.678 parasite eq/mL). For quality control assessment, TcI epimastigotes cultured from one of the macaques were shipped to Dr. Schijman’s laboratory, where panels of spiked GEB samples were prepared and returned for blind DNA isolation and qPCR.

Hemocultures

Following the removal of the ficoll (Sigma-Aldrich, MO) gradient fraction containing the PBMC from 5 ml of whole blood, the remaining red blood cell-containing fraction was culture in liver digested-neutralized tryptose (LDNT) medium at 27° C for up to 3 months. Cultures were periodically screened under inverted microscope for motile parasites. Cultures with detectable parasites were propagated in order to obtain and characterize T. cruzi isolates. Cultures with no visible parasites were subjected to standard PCR. Briefly, total DNA from hemocultures was extracted using a blood DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, MD) and amplified with OneTaq 2x MasterMix solution (New England Biolabs, MA) mixed with T. cruzi specific primers for satellite DNA [48]. PCR products were run on 1.5% agarose gels and imaged in an InGenius gel documentation system (SynGene, MD).

Parasite isolate genotyping

Epimastigote cultures of parasites isolated by hemoculture from the macaque blood samples were lysed for 30 minutes at 50°C in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 100 ug/ml proteinase K, 10 ug/ml RNase A, and 0.5% sodium sarcosinate, pH 8.0). DNA was then extracted twice with phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitated, then resuspended in 5 mM Tris.Cl, pH 7.5. DNA sample integrity was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. Discrete typing unit (DTU) determinations were made following the method of Lewis, et al. [49]. Initial discrimination between TcI and TcII—VI was performed by large subunit rRNA (LSU) PCR and to further confirm the presence of TcI and TcIV a second PCR assay was performed to amplify a portion of the mini-exon. TcI isolates amplify a 350 bp product in the mini-exon PCR, whereas TcIV isolates produce a larger, 400 bp, product. PCR products from appropriate DTU of control strains were included in all of the PCR assays to make clearer the sizes of the amplified products in the test samples.

Cell surface phenotyping

Samples of 100 ul of whole peripheral blood collected in Na2EDTA were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer and incubated with a mix of fluorescently labeled antibodies against cell surface proteins. Antibodies used were anti-CD8 PerCP 5.5 (clone RPA-T8), anti-CD4 APC-Cy7 (clone OKT4), anti-CD28 PE-Cy7 (clone CD28.2) from Biolegend, San Diego, CA; anti-CD95 V450 (clone DX2), anti-CD45RA-Allophicocyanin (clone 5H9), anti-CD27-V450 (clone MT271) from BD Pharmingen, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; and anti-CCR7-Allophicocyanin (clone 150503) from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN. Data from un-fixed samples were acquired in a Beckman Coulter CyAn ADP cytometer and analyzed using the software FlowJo v10.2 (FlowJo, Ashland, OR).

T. cruzi amastigote/trypomastigote lysate

Brazil strain extracellular amastigotes were obtained from trypomastigote cultures induced overnight in pH 5 RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 10 mM phosphate citrate buffer. A mix of amastigotes and trypomastigotes was subjected to freeze/thaw cycles followed by sonication. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and the supernatant was collected. After filter sterilization, the total protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay.

Serology testing with recombinant protein multiplex bioassay

Macaque plasma reactivities against 9 recombinant T. cruzi proteins and parasite lysate were tested in a multiplex assay previously described for testing human and dog serum samples [20,22]. Briefly, macaque plasma was diluted 1:500 and incubated with a pool of the recombinant T. cruzi proteins attached to addressable Liquichip Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen, CA) and T. cruzi amastigote/trypomastigote lysate coupled to Carboxy-Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen Inc). Antibody binding was detected with goat anti-human IgG conjugated to phycoerythrin and quantified on a Bio-Plex Suspension Array System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Weighted median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for samples in duplicate was calculated and the ratio of the specific MFI for each antigen versus a negative control (green fluorescent protein) was estimated for each antigen.

Interferon-gamma ELISPOT assay

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolated by Ficoll gradient were seeded at 4 x 105 cells/mL and stimulated with 10 mg/mL T. cruzi lysate (Brazil strain), cytomegalovirus peptides or 10 ng/mL phorbol-12-myristate-acetate (PMA) and 500 ng/mL Ionomycin for 16 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment; PBMC incubated with complete RPMI media were used as non-stimulated controls. Spot forming cells were automatically enumerated using an ImmunoSpot analyzer (CTL, Cleveland, Ohio). The mean number of spots in triplicate wells was obtained for each condition. The number of specific IFN-γ-secreting T cells was calculated by subtracting the value of the wells containing media alone from the lysate/peptide-stimulated spot count.

Mice infections with macaque isolates

C57BL/6 and B6.129S7-Ifngtm1Ts/J IFNγ cytokine knockout mice (IFNg-KO) were originally purchased from Charles River Laboratories and The Jackson Laboratory respectively and propagated in the University of Georgia animal facility in microisolator cages under specific pathogen-free conditions. Metacyclic trypomastigotes were differentiated from epimastigote cultures using triatomine artificial urine (TAU) and TAU3AAG and purified by incubating overnight with non-heat inactivated fetal bovine serum as described previously [50,51]. Mice were infected intraperitoneally (i.p.) or per os (p.o.) with 106 metacyclic trypomastigotes and euthanized between 120–150 days post- infection to collect skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle, and adipose tissues for quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis [52].

Parasite quantification in infected mouse tissues by Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Parasite load was quantified based on the protocol described previously [52]. Briefly, tissues were lysed using tissue lysis buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.6), 0.1M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and 300g of proteinase K/ml. Samples were then heated for 2 h at 55°C, and extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (Fisher Scientific). Cold ethanol was used to wash and precipitate the DNA along with sodium acetate. Each PCR reaction contained 50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 μM TcSAT30_F (5’-GGCGGATCGTTTTCGAG), 0.5 μM TcSAT179_R (5’-AAGCGGATAGTTCAGGG), iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), and nuclease free water (Ambion) to 20 μl. Quantitative PCR was performed using CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Manager software (Bio-Rad).

Detection of T. cruzi specific CD8+ T cell response in mice

Mouse peripheral blood was obtained by retro-orbital venipuncture, collected in sodium citrate solution, washed, and stained as previously described [53]. Briefly, whole blood was incubated with red blood cell lysis buffer for 5–10 minutes and washed twice with PAB (1x phosphate-buffered saline, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% sodium azide) solution. Cells were probed with MHC-TSKB20 peptide tetramer complexes conjugated to Brilliant Violet 421 fluorophore and the following labeled antibodies: anti-CD44 PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, CA), anti-KLRG1 PE-Cyanine7 (eBioscience, CA), anti-CD8a FITC (Accurate Chemical), and anti-CD127 PE (eBioscience, CA). Cells were also stained with anti-CD4 APC-ef780 (eBioscience, CA), which was used as an exclusion channel. A minimum of 500,000 events were collected using a Cyan ADP flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, FL) and analyzed with FlowJo Version X software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR). MHC-peptide complexes were provided as biotinylated monomers and/or fluorophore-conjugated tetramers by the NIH Tetramer Core Facility at Emory University (Atlanta, GA) and used for identification of CD8+ T cells specific to the TSKB20 (ANYKFTLV/Kb) epitope as described previously [26].

Sensitivity of macaque isolates to benznidazole treatment

Benznidazole (LAFEPE Medicamentos, Brazil) was prepared by pulverization of one tablet containing 100 mg of the active principle, followed by suspension in distilled water. Mice were drug treated via oral gavage with at 100 mg/kg of body weight once every 5 days for 60 days as described previously [27]. Two to three weeks after the end of treatment, mice were immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg/day) injected i.p. at 2–3 days interval for a total of four doses. Survival and parasitemia were monitored daily in untreated controls beginning 10 days after the start of cyclophosphamide treatment. After parasite detection in blood of untreated controls, all mice were euthanized and tissue samples were collected for parasite load determination by RT-PCR.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis by nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and the nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) were performed using the GraphPad Prism 9.0 software. Differences between 2 groups were considered significant at P <0.05.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Macaques in the study had been infected at least for an average duration of 6.5 years.

Male (n = 19) and female (n = 31) macaques in the study had similar ages and displayed comparable minimum length of infection ranging from 1.5 to 8.5 years.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Parasite levels in blood and minimum length of infection were similar in macaques infected with either TcI or TcIV.

Parasite load in blood detected by qPCR (A) and minimum length of infection (B) in macaques infected with T. cruzi isolates belonging to lineages TcI (n = 33 in A; n = 27 in B) and TcIV (n = 7). ns: non-significant by Mann Whitney test.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Health condition of seropositive macaques does not correlate with parasite load or minimum length of infection.

Parasite level in blood determined by qPCR (A) and minimum length of infection (B) in animals displaying no symptoms (no symptom; n = 28), poor general health condition (poor health; n = 9) or cardiac anomalies (cardiac anom; n = 13). ns: non-significant by Mann Whitney test.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Data set containing all numerical values used to generate Figure panels.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jane VandeBerg and associates for establishing the original serological methods and screening the macaque colony; Patricia Frost and associates for managing the macaque colony, collecting the blood samples, and performing the EKGs; Rodolfo Viotti for interpreting the EKG results; Michael Mahaney and Deborah Newman for database development and management; Alejandro Schijman, Carolina Cura, Natalie Juiz, and Juan Carlos Ramirez for guidance and assistance with the blood macaque qPCR; Gloria Bonecini Almeida for providing access to serology kits from Bio-Manguinhos; Todd Minning for the isolate genotyping and Julie Nelson from the CTEGD Cytometry Shared Resource Lab for her assistance in the flow cytometry assays.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Funded by grant #WT097262 to RLT, JLV and IR from the Wellcome Trust (wellcome.org). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Castro JA, de Mecca MM, Bartel LC. Toxic side effects of drugs used to treat Chagas’ disease (American trypanosomiasis). Human & experimental toxicology. 2006;25(8):471–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jackson Y, Alirol E, Getaz L, Wolff H, Combescure C, Chappuis F. Tolerance and safety of nifurtimox in patients with chronic chagas disease. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2010;51(10):e69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Navarro M, Norman FF, Perez-Molina JA, Lopez-Velez R. Benznidazole shortage makes chagas disease a neglected tropical disease in developed countries: data from Spain. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2012;87(3):489–90. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yun O, Lima MA, Ellman T, Chambi W, Castillo S, Flevaud L, et al. Feasibility, drug safety, and effectiveness of etiological treatment programs for Chagas disease in Honduras, Guatemala, and Bolivia: 10-year experience of Medecins Sans Frontieres. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2009;3(7):e488. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bern C, Kjos S, Yabsley MJ, Montgomery SP. Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ Disease in the United States. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2011;24(4):655–81. 10.1128/CMR.00005-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beatty NL, Klotz SA. Autochthonous Chagas Disease in the United States: How Are People Getting Infected? The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2020;103(3):967–9. 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bern C, Messenger LA, Whitman JD, Maguire JH. Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2019;33(1). 10.1128/CMR.00023-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barth E, Kundrotas L. Megacolon from Chagas disease in an ancient Texan. Diagnosis: Chagas disease causing mega-disease, in this case megacolon. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(1):35–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cantey PT, Stramer SL, Townsend RL, Kamel H, Ofafa K, Todd CW, et al. The United States Trypanosoma cruzi Infection Study: evidence for vector-borne transmission of the parasite that causes Chagas disease among United States blood donors. Transfusion. 2012;52(9):1922–30. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03581.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Garcia MN, Aguilar D, Gorchakov R, Rossmann SN, Montgomery SP, Rivera H, et al. Evidence of autochthonous Chagas disease in southeastern Texas. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2015;92(2):325–30. 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Montgomery SP, Parise ME, Dotson EM, Bialek SR. What Do We Know About Chagas Disease in the United States? The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2016;95(6):1225–7. 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turabelidze G, Vasudevan A, Rojas-Moreno C, Montgomery SP, Baker M, Pratt D, et al. Autochthonous Chagas Disease—Missouri, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(7):193–5. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6907a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kjos SA, Marcet PL, Yabsley MJ, Kitron U, Snowden KF, Logan KS, et al. Identification of bloodmeal sources and Trypanosoma cruzi infection in triatomine bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from residential settings in Texas, the United States. Journal of medical entomology. 2013;50(5):1126–39. 10.1603/me12242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klotz SA, Schmidt JO, Dorn PL, Ivanyi C, Sullivan KR, Stevens L. Free-roaming kissing bugs, vectors of Chagas disease, feed often on humans in the Southwest. The American journal of medicine. 2014;127(5):421–6. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meyers AC, Purnell JC, Ellis MM, Auckland LD, Meinders M, Hamer SA. Nationwide Exposure of U.S. Working Dogs to the Chagas Disease Parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2020;102(5):1078–85. 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pisharath H, Zao CL, Kreeger J, Portugal S, Kawabe T, Burton T, et al. Immunopathologic characterization of naturally acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection and cardiac sequalae in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science: JAALAS. 2013;52(5):545–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zecca IB, Hodo CL, Slack S, Auckland L, Rodgers S, Killets KC, et al. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and associated histologic findings in domestic cats (Felis catus). Vet Parasitol. 2020;278:109014. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.109014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Williams JT, Dick EJ Jr., VandeBerg JL, Hubbard GB. Natural Chagas disease in four baboons. Journal of medical primatology. 2009;38(2):107–13. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00308.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grieves JL, Hubbard GB, Williams JT, Vandeberg JL, Dick EJ Jr., Lopez-Alvarenga JC, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi in non-human primates with a history of stillbirths: a retrospective study (Papio hamadryas spp.) and case report (Macaca fascicularis). Journal of medical primatology. 2008;37(6):318–28. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00302.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cooley G, Etheridge RD, Boehlke C, Bundy B, Weatherly DB, Minning T, et al. High throughput selection of effective serodiagnostics for Trypanosoma cruzi infection. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2008;2(10):e316. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Laucella SA, Mazliah DP, Bertocchi G, Alvarez MG, Cooley G, Viotti R, et al. Changes in Trypanosoma cruzi-specific immune responses after treatment: surrogate markers of treatment efficacy. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2009;49(11):1675–84. 10.1086/648072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hartley AN, Cooley G, Gwyn S, Orozco MM, Tarleton RL. Frequency of IFNgamma-producing T cells correlates with seroreactivity and activated T cells during canine Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Veterinary research. 2014;45:6. 10.1186/1297-9716-45-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Albareda MC, Olivera GC, Laucella SA, Alvarez MG, Fernandez ER, Lococo B, et al. Chronic human infection with Trypanosoma cruzi drives CD4+ T cells to immune senescence. Journal of immunology. 2009;183(6):4103–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Albareda MC, De Rissio AM, Tomas G, Serjan A, Alvarez MG, Viotti R, et al. Polyfunctional T cell responses in children in early stages of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection contrast with monofunctional responses of long-term infected adults. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013;7(12):e2575. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibayrenc M, Macedo AM, Teixeira MM, et al. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(2):240–53. 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martin DL, Weatherly DB, Laucella SA, Cabinian MA, Crim MT, Sullivan S, et al. CD8+ T-Cell responses to Trypanosoma cruzi are highly focused on strain-variant trans-sialidase epitopes. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2(8):e77. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bustamante JM, Craft JM, Crowe BD, Ketchie SA, Tarleton RL. New, combined, and reduced dosing treatment protocols cure Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(1):150–62. 10.1093/infdis/jit420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rassi A Jr ., Rassi A, Little WC. Chagas’ heart disease. Clinical cardiology. 2000;23(12):883–9. 10.1002/clc.4960231205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ribeiro AL, Nunes MP, Teixeira MM, Rocha MO. Diagnosis and management of Chagas disease and cardiomyopathy. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2012;9(10):576–89. 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carvalho CM, Andrade MC, Xavier SS, Mangia RH, Britto CC, Jansen AM, et al. Chronic Chagas’ disease in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): evaluation of parasitemia, serology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and radiology. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2003;68(6):683–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carvalho CM, Silverio JC, da Silva AA, Pereira IR, Coelho JM, Britto CC, et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase in heart tissue and nitric oxide in serum of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected rhesus monkeys: association with heart injury. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(5):e1644. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Samudio M, Montenegro-James S, Kasamatsu E, Cabral M, Schinini A, Rojas De Arias A, et al. Local and systemic cytokine expression during experimental chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a Cebus monkey model. Parasite Immunol. 1999;21(9):451–60. 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1999.00242.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Messenger LA, Miles MA, Bern C. Between a bug and a hard place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical outcomes of Chagas disease. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2015;13(8):995–1029. 10.1586/14787210.2015.1056158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zingales B. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: Something new for something known about Chagas disease manifestations, serodiagnosis and drug sensitivity. Acta Trop. 2018;184:38–52. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Herrera C, Majeau A, Didier P, Falkenstein KP, Dumonteil E. Trypanosoma cruzi diversity in naturally infected nonhuman primates in Louisiana assessed by deep sequencing of the mini-exon gene. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;113(5):281–6. 10.1093/trstmh/try119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Diez C, Lorenz V, Ortiz S, Gonzalez V, Racca A, Bontempi I, et al. Genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi sublineage in human samples from a North-East Argentina area by hybridization with DNA probes and specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2010;82(1):67–73. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Monje-Rumi MM, Brandan CP, Ragone PG, Tomasini N, Lauthier JJ, Alberti D’Amato AM, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi diversity in the Gran Chaco: mixed infections and differential host distribution of TcV and TcVI. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;29:53–9. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Siriano Lda R, Luquetti AO, Avelar JB, Marra NL, de Castro AM. Chagas disease: increased parasitemia during pregnancy detected by hemoculture. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2011;84(4):569–74. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Albareda MC, Perez-Mazliah D, Natale MA, Castro-Eiro M, Alvarez MG, Viotti R, et al. Perturbed T cell IL-7 receptor signaling in chronic Chagas disease. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(8):3883–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1402202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sullivan NL, Eickhoff CS, Sagartz J, Hoft DF. Deficiency of antigen-specific B cells results in decreased Trypanosoma cruzi systemic but not mucosal immunity due to CD8 T cell exhaustion. Journal of immunology. 2015;194(4):1806–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Berry ASF, Salazar-Sanchez R, Castillo-Neyra R, Borrini-Mayori K, Chipana-Ramos C, Vargas-Maquera M, et al. Sexual reproduction in a natural Trypanosoma cruzi population. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2019;13(5):e0007392. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Messenger LA, Miles MA. Evidence and importance of genetic exchange among field populations of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2015;151:150–5. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schwabl P, Imamura H, Van den Broeck F, Costales JA, Maiguashca-Sanchez J, Miles MA, et al. Meiotic sex in Chagas disease parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3972. 10.1038/s41467-019-11771-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zabalgoitia M, Ventura J, Anderson L, Williams JT, Carey KD, Vandeberg JL. Electrocardiographic findings in naturally acquired chagasic heart disease in nonhuman primates. J Electrocardiol. 2003;36(2):155–60. 10.1054/jelc.2003.50019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Duffy T, Bisio M, Altcheh J, Burgos JM, Diez M, Levin MJ, et al. Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in chagas disease patients. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2009;3(4):e419. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duffy T, Cura CI, Ramirez JC, Abate T, Cayo NM, Parrado R, et al. Analytical performance of a multiplex Real-Time PCR assay using TaqMan probes for quantification of Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA in blood samples. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013;7(1):e2000. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Burns MJ, Nixon GJ, Foy CA, Harris N. Standardisation of data from real-time quantitative PCR methods—evaluation of outliers and comparison of calibration curves. BMC Biotechnol. 2005;5:31. 10.1186/1472-6750-5-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kurup SP, Tarleton RL. Perpetual expression of PAMPs necessary for optimal immune control and clearance of a persistent pathogen. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2616. 10.1038/ncomms3616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lewis MD, Ma J, Yeo M, Carrasco HJ, Llewellyn MS, Miles MA. Genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi: systematic selection of assays allowing rapid and accurate discrimination of all known lineages. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2009;81(6):1041–9. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bonaldo MC, Souto-Padron T, de Souza W, Goldenberg S. Cell-substrate adhesion during Trypanosoma cruzi differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1988;106(4):1349–58. 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Contreras VT, Salles JM, Thomas N, Morel CM, Goldenberg S. In vitro differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi under chemically defined conditions. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985;16(3):315–27. 10.1016/0166-6851(85)90073-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cummings KL, Tarleton RL. Rapid quantitation of Trypanosoma cruzi in host tissue by real-time PCR. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;129(1):53–9. 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00093-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bustamante JM, Bixby LM, Tarleton RL. Drug-induced cure drives conversion to a stable and protective CD8+ T central memory response in chronic Chagas disease. Nat Med. 2008;14(5):542–50. 10.1038/nm1744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009141.r001

Decision Letter 0

Barbara A Burleigh, Ana Rodriguez

15 Feb 2021

Dear Rick

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "High variation in immune responses and parasite phenotypes in naturally acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a captive non-human primate breeding colony in Texas, USA" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by three independent reviewers. Overall, the reviewers appreciated the unique opportunity of your group to study the immune responses in a cohort of macaques that had become naturally infected with T. cruzi. The study was considered to be well done and the manuscript clearly written. However, an important critique of the manuscript relates to missing information that would be very helpful for readers to better evaluate the study and its findings. For example, there are references to the health status of the macaques but this evaluation is not backed up by clinical or laboratory findings. Considering that the study aims to correlate parasitological and immunological parameters to clinical findings in this unusual cohort of T. cruzi infected NHP, all relevant information/data should be included as indicated in the reviews.

Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.  

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. 

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Barbara A Burleigh

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Ana Rodriguez

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: - The objectives of the study are clearly stated and addressed. The studied group contained 64 macaques soropositives for T. cruzi infection, housed in an outdoor enclosure at a research facility in Southern US.

- Not all 64 animals were assayed in all techniques through the study. It would facilitate reading if the number of participant animals was indicated in the legends of each graph.

- It should be included the information on the Ig isotypes measured in the study, considering that the isotype gives valuable information about the host's immunity branches involved in their anti-cruzi response.

Reviewer #2: Yes for all questions!

Reviewer #3: The authors performed a series of immune and diagnostic studies that were all performed using high quality and rigorous standards. The authors acquired animal welfare committee approval prior to data collection, and the appropriate veterinary standards were used for data collection. Power calculations were not mentioned in the manuscript, and might have potentially been low due to the relatively small number of infected primates available for investigation. However, the authors did use appropriate statistics and did not make exaggerated claims based on their results.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: - The results are clearly presented, with good quality figures.

- Fig 6A does not show any TcIV results, although in lines 208-209 it is mentioned the authors found TcIV-only samples. The authors should show individual results for all animals in supplementary material.

- The in vivo experiments (Fig 7) did not add much value to the study. The conclusion that "... isolates ... showed a number of treatment failures, similar to what has been reported with other more “benznidazole-resistant” T. cruzi lines [27]" without deeper exploration of the genetics of each isolate andqor the causes for such discrepancies, was not worth the time, resources, and mice invested in these in vitro experiments.

Reviewer #2: Yes for all

Reviewer #3: Results were described and displayed appropriately.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: - Thirteen macaques were soropositive but had negative qPCR and culture/qPCR results. These macaques were not evaluated by EKG. But then, on line 321, the authors state that "... health status and infection-related pathology ... correlated with the antibody response against a T. cruzi lysate but not with parasite levels in blood or the other immune parameters measured here." Based in their own findings, i.e. that cardiac anomalies correlated only with antibody response, the authors should have included the EKG results from the 13 macaques that were soropositive but had negative qPCR. These 13 macaques is the group that will prove their point from line 321, and these results were not shown.

- In fact, only 12 out of 64 macaques had EKG exams performed (line 382). I consider this a relevant flaw in the study, since it claims to correlate clinical findings with immunological and parasitological findings (line 289). Furthermore, EKG excerpts from individual macaques must be included as supplementary materials. As it is now, the manuscript requires the reader to accept third party interpretation of the EKG results and the "poor health" status from Fig 8 without having access to clinical and laboratorial parameters used to define "poor health" or the original EKG readings. In this sense, the people involved in performing and interpreting the clinical data and EKGs should share authorship (and accountability) for the findings, instead of just being mentioned in the acknowledgements section (lines 534-535). If this study is reusing previous clinical data acquired routinely at this macaques facility, this must be made clear in the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: The authors' multiple scientific studies resulted in continued support that mammalian host immunologic response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection is complicated and varied. Further, they identified that multiple genetic discrete typing units were present in this focal population, suggesting the presence of co-existence of TCI and TCIV in local USA populations.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Full disclosure of results, supplementary material, and authorships are necessary for supporting the conclusions of the manuscript. Clinical and laboratorial parameters used to define the health status of the macaques should be stated and individual data must be shown, possibly as supplementary material. Individual EKG excerpts for all macaques should be included as supplementary materials.

Reviewer #2: no need to change

Reviewer #3: This article is well written, well supported and ready for publication.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This study focused on a colony of 64 macaques living in an outdoor enclosure at a research facility in Southern US. These animals have been chronically infected by T. cruzi, what makes them a group of special interest. The study analysed immunological and parasitological parameters in these animals and tried to correlate those findings with their cardiological status. Analysis of serial samples, as it was performed here, are gold standard if we want to fully understand the dynamics of T. cruzi infection. Nevertheless, the study falls short in the characterisation of their clinical status and in the full disclosure of results. This reviewer undertands that revision of results, supplementary material, and authorships are necessary for supporting the conclusions of the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: This an important study that evaluates the immune response induced by differente lineages of T. cruzi. It is unique in the number of samples that were obtained from non-human primates and useful to translate to human disease. The immunological studies are well performed.

Reviewer #3: This investigation took advantage of a convenient sample that is not readily available in nature for inquisition. The authors made several important immunologic and scientific findings, that cumulatively suggest that host immune response to T cruzi infection is quite varied and complicated. One minor recommendation, would be to include the actual months samples were collected and to provide information as to whether the primates were inside versus outside. It was stated that primates were in different conditions, and one could wonder whether those outside during peak triatomine season have the potential for reinfection, which could influence the results. Clearly this would be hard to confirm, but it should be noted in the limitation.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009141.r003

Decision Letter 1

Barbara A Burleigh, Ana Rodriguez

22 Mar 2021

Dear Rick,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'High variation in immune responses and parasite phenotypes in naturally acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a captive non-human primate breeding colony in Texas, USA' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Barbara A Burleigh

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Ana Rodriguez

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009141.r004

Acceptance letter

Barbara A Burleigh, Ana Rodriguez

29 Mar 2021

Dear Dr. Tarleton,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "High variation in immune responses and parasite phenotypes in naturally acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a captive non-human primate breeding colony in Texas, USA," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Macaques in the study had been infected at least for an average duration of 6.5 years.

    Male (n = 19) and female (n = 31) macaques in the study had similar ages and displayed comparable minimum length of infection ranging from 1.5 to 8.5 years.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Parasite levels in blood and minimum length of infection were similar in macaques infected with either TcI or TcIV.

    Parasite load in blood detected by qPCR (A) and minimum length of infection (B) in macaques infected with T. cruzi isolates belonging to lineages TcI (n = 33 in A; n = 27 in B) and TcIV (n = 7). ns: non-significant by Mann Whitney test.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Health condition of seropositive macaques does not correlate with parasite load or minimum length of infection.

    Parasite level in blood determined by qPCR (A) and minimum length of infection (B) in animals displaying no symptoms (no symptom; n = 28), poor general health condition (poor health; n = 9) or cardiac anomalies (cardiac anom; n = 13). ns: non-significant by Mann Whitney test.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Data set containing all numerical values used to generate Figure panels.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES