Abstract
Skeletal muscle denervation occurs in diverse conditions and causes severe muscle atrophy. Signaling by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) plays a central role in the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass by regulating net protein balance; yet, its role in denervation-induced atrophy is unclear. In this study, by using skeletal muscle-specific and inducible raptor knockout mice, we demonstrate that signaling through mTORC1 is activated during denervation and plays an essential role in mitigating the atrophy of non-type IIB muscle fibers. Measurements of protein synthesis rates of individual fibers suggest that denervation increases protein synthesis specifically in non-type IIB muscle fibers and that mTORC1 is required for this event. Furthermore, denervation induced a more pronounced increase in the level of phosphorylated ribosomal S6 protein in non-type IIB muscle fibers than in type IIB muscle fibers. Collectively, our results unveil a novel role for mTORC1 in mediating a fiber type-specific regulation of muscle size and protein synthesis during denervation.
Subject terms: Neurophysiology, TOR signalling
Introduction
Skeletal muscle is a highly plastic tissue that comprises different types of muscle fibers whose mass and size largely depend on neural activity. Loss of neural activity or denervation occurs in a variety of conditions, including nerve injury, diseases, and aging, and leads to severe muscle atrophy through the negative balance between protein synthesis and degradation1,2. Denervation-induced muscle atrophy contributes to weakness, loss of independence, and an increased risk of morbidity and mortality; however, its molecular regulators remain poorly defined.
The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is one of the key regulators of cell size and is also implicated in denervation-induced atrophy. Quy et al.3 first reported that signaling through mTORC1 is not only activated by denervation, but is also required for increasing protein synthesis and counteracting the development of atrophy. Since then, Tang et al.4 concluded that denervation-induced mTORC1 signaling actually promotes atrophy through negative feedback inhibition of Akt and a subsequent increase in the expression of atrogenes such as MAFbx E3 ubiquitin ligase. While these studies revealed contrasting roles of mTORC1 by using the same mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin, MacDonald et al.5 did not find any effect of rapamycin on denervation-induced muscle atrophy. Hence, the role of mTORC1 in denervation atrophy remains controversial.
The inconsistency of the aforementioned results could be due to different efficacy/actions of systemic rapamycin administration in vivo. For instance, Tang et al.4 showed the expected inhibition of mTORC1 and increase in Akt phosphorylation by rapamycin in denervated muscle whereas, in the study by MacDonald et al.5, rapamycin appeared to inhibit mTORC2 more than mTORC1, leading to decreased Akt phosphorylation during denervation. Thus, in the current study, we set out to circumvent the potential issues that are associated with the use of rapamycin by using mice with skeletal muscle-specific and inducible knockout of raptor, the defining component of mTORC1.
Results
Signaling through mTORC1 contributes to the regulation of ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway during denervation
We have previously shown that the loss of raptor protein in inducible raptor knockout (iRAmKO) mice was maximal within 14–21 days of being treated with tamoxifen6. Hence, to determine the role that raptor/mTORC1 exerts during denervation, we subjected iRAmKO and littermate wild-type (WT) mice to unilateral denervation at 21 days after tamoxifen treatment. At 7 days post denervation, both raptor protein and mTORC1 signaling as revealed by the phosphorylation of the 70 kDa ribosomal S6 protein (p70) on the threonine 389 residue were increased in tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GAST) muscles from WT mice when compared to the contralateral muscles from the same mice (Fig. 1A, B). As expected, the increased levels of raptor and mTORC1 signaling were reduced in the muscles of the iRAmKO mice (Fig. 1A, B). Consistent with the ability of mTORC1 to inhibit signaling through Akt, the reduced mTORC1 signaling in iRAmKO mice was associated with an enhanced amount of phosphorylated Akt (i.e., active Akt) and suppressed expression of MAFbx in denervated muscles (Fig. 1A, C and Fig. S1). Likewise, iRAmKO modestly but significantly attenuated K48 linkage-specific poly-ubuiquitination (i.e., ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis) in denervated muscles (Fig. 1A, D). Combined, these results indicate that signaling through mTORC1 contributes to the regulation of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway during denervation.
Signaling through mTORC1 alleviates atrophy of non-type IIB muscle fibers, but not of type IIB fibers, during denervation
The activation of mTORC1 signaling that occurs during denervation could either alleviate or exacerbate muscle atrophy depending on its impact on the balance between protein synthesis and degradation3,4. The anabolic/catabolic response of muscle fibers to atrophic conditions can be fiber type-specific7,8. Hence, it is possible that the anabolic/catabolic balance and resulting atrophic response, which is impacted by mTORC1 signaling during denervation, could also be fiber type-specific. Accordingly, we analyzed the size of type IIB (non-human muscle fiber type) and non-type IIB (human muscle fiber types) muscle fibers from three different muscles collected 14 days after denervation. Consistent with a recent report9, type IIB fibers of WT TA muscles underwent more severe atrophy than their non-type IIB fibers (Fig. 2A). In extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and GAST muscles, the non-type IIB fibers did not even show a significant reduction in size (Fig. 2A, B). Interestingly, however, the atrophy resistance of non-type IIB muscle fibers was largely lost in muscles from the iRAmKO mice, while type IIB fibers were either unaffected or even slightly protected from atrophy by the loss of raptor (Fig. 2A–C). Together, these results identify a fiber type-specific role of mTORC1 signaling that, depending on the fiber type, can either attenuate or augment denervation-induced atrophy.
Signaling through mTORC1 enhances protein synthesis rates and the level of phosphorylated S6, preferably in non-type IIB muscle fibers
Because iRAmKO promoted atrophy of non-type IIB muscle fibers during denervation despite the overall suppression of the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway, we asked if iRAmKO inhibited protein synthesis in denervated non-type IIB muscle fibers. As such, we examined the rate of protein synthesis at the single fiber level using an immunohistochemical version of the surface sensing of translation (SUnSET)10. Interestingly, the results revealed that the rate of protein synthesis was increased only in non-type IIB muscle fibers following denervation and that this increase was abolished by the loss of raptor (Fig. 3A). It has been reported that the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6, a downstream target of mTORC1, can play a critical role in the maintenance of cell size independently of protein synthesis11,12. To determine the potential involvement of S6 phosphorylation in the fiber type-specific regulation of muscle size during denervation, we also examined the amount of phosphorylated S6 in each fiber type. The results showed that denervation induced an increase in the level of phosphorylated S6 in non-type IIB muscle fibers and that this increase was significantly attenuated in type IIB muscle fibers (Fig. 3B). Combined, these findings suggest that, during denervation, mTORC1 enhances protein synthesis and the level of phosphorylated S6, preferably in non-type IIB muscle fibers, which possibly confers the atrophy-resistant property of these fibers.
Signaling through mTORC1 regulates muscle fiber type proportion during denervation
In addition to protein metabolism, mTORC1 appears to regulate muscle fiber type proportion during denervation as forced activation mTORC1 by muscle-specific deletion of its inhibitor TSC1 (TSCmKO) was shown to decrease the proportion of non-type IIB muscle fibers following denervation9. Based on this finding, we expected that the inactivation of mTORC1 by iRAmKO would lead to an increased proportion of non-type IIB muscle fibers following denervation. However, the loss of raptor counteracted the denervation-induced increase in the proportion of non-type IIB muscle fibers in EDL, and even decreased the non-type IIB muscle fiber proportion in the TA following denervation (Fig. 4). Although unexpected, this mTORC1-dependent increase/maintenance of more oxidative non-type IIB muscle fibers during denervation is in line with the role of mTORC1 positively regulating skeletal muscle oxidative function13.
Discussion
Whether the enhanced signaling through mTORC1 that occurs during denervation impacts the development of atrophy has been unclear. There have been attempts to directly address this question by using constitutive skeletal muscle raptor knockout (RAmKO) mice9,14. In those studies, RAmKO enhanced the development of atrophy, suggesting that denervation-induced mTORC1 signaling may prevent gross muscle atrophy. However, those results were potentially confounded by the dystrophic nature of the RAmKO muscle15. On the other hand, acute deletion of skeletal muscle raptor in iRAmKO mice did not induce any of the problematic traits shown in the RAmKO mice6,16. In this study, by using iRAmKO mice, we demonstrate that signaling through mTORC1 alleviates only the atrophy of non-type IIB muscle fibers. We also found that mTORC1 signaling promotes protein synthesis specifically in non-type IIB muscle fibers during denervation, providing mechanistic insights into the fiber type-specific regulation of muscle fiber size by mTORC1.
Another interesting finding in this study is that, contrary to non-type IIB muscle fibers, type IIB fibers of GAST muscle were partially protected from denervation atrophy by iRAmKO, and this effect was associated with the protection of the denervation-induced loss of GAST muscle mass (Fig. S2) [note that GAST muscle is predominantly comprised of type IIB muscle fibers (~74%)17, making its mass highly sensitive to changes in type IIB muscle fiber size]. Although we did not focus on the potential mechanisms of the anti-atrophic effect of iRAmKO on type IIB muscle fibers, a recent study by Lang et al.7 provided an important clue. Specifically, they performed single muscle fiber proteomics and found that denervation upregulates many proteasomal subunits predominantly in type IIB muscle fibers. This finding first suggests that, in addition to the lack of increase in protein synthesis, a high rate of proteasome-mediated proteolysis in type IIB muscle fibers resulted in a more severe atrophic response to denervation than other fiber types. Furthermore, because mTORC1 is also known to promote proteolysis through increased gene expression of proteasomal subunits18, inhibition of mTORC1 by iRAmKO may have suppressed the type IIB muscle fiber-specific increase in proteasomal degradation and thereby the severe atrophy of that fiber type from GAST during denervation.
Although our results indicate that denervation-induced increase in mTORC1 signaling protected non-type IIB muscle fibers from atrophy, it is questionable whether this role of mTORC1 is indeed functionally beneficial. This suspicion mostly derives from the inhibitory function of mTORC1 on autophagy19, which is critical for the maintenance of muscle integrity20. Indeed, studies have shown that denervation suppresses autophagy flux, and forced activation of mTORC1 by TSCmKO leads to a severe myopathy during denervation3,9. However, contrary to the results of our study, deletion of autophagy gene, Atg7, or TSCmKO aggravated denervation-induced muscle atrophy9,20, particularly in non-type IIB fibers9, which appears to be a phenotypic consequence of severe autophagy inhibition. Furthermore, it has been shown that prolonged denervation (>7 days) overcomes mTORC1-mediated autophagy suppression and even increases autophagy flux by upregulating autophagy inducers11. Although still unclear, these results suggest that the spontaneous (unforced) activation of mTORC1 signaling we observed at 14 days after denervation would not have suppressed autophagy flux to the level that deteriorates the integrity of non-type IIB muscle fibers.
The current study generates several follow-up questions: how denervation differentially regulates mTORC1-mediated protein synthesis among fiber types, whether denervation also regulates proteolysis in a fiber type-specific manner via mTORC1, and whether the fiber type-specific role of mTORC1 alters in different types of denervation such as that it occurs during aging. Addressing these issues will be of great importance for future therapies targeting skeletal muscle atrophy.
Materials and methods
Animals
iRAmKO male mice were generated by crossing female mice homozygous for floxed raptor (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) with male mice homozygous for floxed raptor and hemizygous for human skeletal actin-driven expression of a mutated estrogen receptor-flanked Cre recombinase (HSA-MCM)6. The presence of the HSA-MCM allele was determined by PCR genotyping with tail snips21, and littermates that were homozygous for floxed raptor but did not contain the HSA-MCM allele served as WT controls. To induce the translocation of MCM into the nucleus, both iRAmKO and WT mice at 6 weeks of age were injected intraperitoneally with a tamoxifen solution every 24 h for 5 days as previously described6. All mice were housed in a room maintained with a 12-h light/dark cycle and received food and water ad libitum. Mice aged 2.5 months old were randomly allocated to experimental groups and received surgical procedures under anesthesia with isoflurane. All of the methods used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Denervation
Unilateral denervation of the hindlimb muscles was performed as previously described22. Briefly, a 0.5-cm section of the sciatic nerve was removed from the right leg, while the left leg was subjected to a sham surgery and served as a contralateral control. After the surgery, the skin incision was closed with a 5-0 polysorb suture.
Measurements of protein synthesis
In vivo measurements of protein synthesis were performed with the SUnSET technique10. Specifically, puromycin dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected intraperitoneally into mice at the concentration of 0.04 µmol/g body weight, and muscles were collected exactly 30 min after injection. The amount of puromycin-incorporated peptides was then analyzed by immunohistochemistry as below.
Western blotting
Frozen muscles were homogenized with a Polytron in ice-cold buffer [40 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 25 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 25 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM PMSF], and protein concentrations of the whole homogenates were determined with the DC Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Western blotting was performed with an equal amount of protein from each whole homogenate sample following the standard procedure as previously described23. Images of the blots were captured with a Chemi410 camera mounted to an Autochemisystem (UVP, Upland, CA, USA) and quantified densitometrically by ImageJ 1.53 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analyses of cross-sectional area, protein synthesis, and phosphor-S6 were performed as previously described22,24. Briefly, muscles from denervated and sham-operated contralateral legs were submerged individually (for cross-sectional area) or adjacent to one another (for protein synthesis/phosphor-S6) in optimal cutting temperature compound at resting length and frozen in liquid nitrogen-chilled isopentane. Cross-sections (10-μm-thick) from the mid-belly of the muscles were fixed in acetone for 10 min, rehydrated with PBS for 15 min, and incubated for 1 h in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% Triton X-100, and anti-mouse IgG Fab (for protein synthesis; 1:10, 115-007-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) or 5% normal goat serum (for phosphor-S6; 005-000-121, Jackson ImmunoResearch). The target proteins on the sections were then probed with the appropriate antibodies and visualized with a DS-QiMc camera mounted on an 80i epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). All image analyses were performed by investigators who were blinded to the sample identification.
Antibodies
The primary antibodies used in this study are anti-raptor (#2280), anti-phospho-p70 (T389, #9234), anti-p70 (#2708), anti-phosphor-Akt (T308, #9275), anti-Akt (#9272), anti-K48 linkage-specific polyubiquitin (#8081), anti-pan-actin (#8456), anti-phosphor-S6 (S240/244, #5364) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); anti-ubiquitin (sc8017) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA); anti-laminin (L9393), anti-puromycin (MABE343) from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA); anti-MAFbx, anti-MuRF1 from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Tarrytown, NY, USA); anti-type IIB myosin heavy chain from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa City, IA, USA).
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Frozen muscles were homogenized with a ribonuclease-free pestle in ice-cold TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed using the GeneJET RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quanta Bioscience, Beverly, MA, USA), respectively. Complementary DNA was subjected to qPCR on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBR Green. The primer sequences used were as follows: 5′-CTTTCAACAGACTGGACTTCTCGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAGCTCCAACAGCCTTACTACGT-3′ (reverse) for MAFbx, 5′-GAGAACCTGGAGAAGCAGCT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCGCGGTTGGTCCAGTAG-3′ (reverse) for MuRF1, and 5′-GCAGCCTCGTCCCGTAGAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATGGCAACAATCTCCACTTTGC-3′ (reverse) for Gapdh as an internal control.
Statistics
All values were presented as mean ± s.e.m. with individual animal data points shown in graphs (the number of the points represents n). The sample size for each experiment was chosen based on previous publications and preliminary data. Mice exhibiting any sign of abnormality determined by pre-established criteria (e.g., lethargy, elevated respiration rate, reduced body weight, etc.) were excluded from experiments. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined by a two-tailed paired or unpaired t test, or two-/three-way mixed analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey’s or planned pairwise comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed upon verification of the test assumptions using the OriginPro 2019 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) and R 4.0.2 (R Core Team). The variation between the test groups was similar.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. for providing the anti-MAFbx and anti-MuRF1 antibodies. Special thanks are extended to Da Eun Han (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) for assisting in data analyses.
Author contributions
J.-S.Y. and T.A.H. conceptualized and designed the experiments, and analyzed and interpreted data; J.-S.Y., K.K., and N.D.S. acquired data; J.-S.Y., T.A.H., and J.C. wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Grants to T.A.H. (AR057347 and AR074932) and J.C. (AR048914), and National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant to J.C. (GM089771).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests
Footnotes
Edited by Ivano Amelio
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Jae-Sung You, Email: youj@illinois.edu.
Troy A. Hornberger, Email: troy.hornberger@wisc.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-021-00460-w.
References
- 1.Ehmsen JT, Hoke A. Cellular and molecular features of neurogenic skeletal muscle atrophy. Exp. Neurol. 2020;331:113379. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goodman CA, Mayhew DL, Hornberger TA. Recent progress toward understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate skeletal muscle mass. Cell Signal. 2011;23:1896–1906. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quy PN, Kuma A, Pierre P, Mizushima N. Proteasome-dependent activation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is essential for autophagy suppression and muscle remodeling following denervation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:1125–1134. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.399949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tang H, et al. mTORC1 promotes denervation-induced muscle atrophy through a mechanism involving the activation of FoxO and E3 ubiquitin ligases. Sci. Signal. 2014;7:ra18. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.MacDonald EM, et al. Denervation atrophy is independent from Akt and mTOR activation and is not rescued by myostatin inhibition. Dis. Model Mech. 2014;7:471–481. doi: 10.1242/dmm.014126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.You JS, et al. The role of raptor in the mechanical load-induced regulation of mTOR signaling, protein synthesis, and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. FASEB J. 2019;33:4021–4034. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801653RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lang F, et al. Single muscle fiber proteomics reveals distinct protein changes in slow and fast fibers during muscle atrophy. J. Proteome Res. 2018;17:3333–3347. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goodman CA, Kotecki JA, Jacobs BL, Hornberger TA. Muscle fiber type-dependent differences in the regulation of protein synthesis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castets P, et al. mTORC1 and PKB/Akt control the muscle response to denervation by regulating autophagy and HDAC4. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3187. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11227-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goodman CA, et al. Novel insights into the regulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis as revealed by a new nonradioactive in vivo technique. FASEB J. 2011;25:1028–1039. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-168799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ruvinsky I, et al. Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation is a determinant of cell size and glucose homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2199–2211. doi: 10.1101/gad.351605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruvinsky I, et al. Mice deficient in ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation suffer from muscle weakness that reflects a growth defect and energy deficit. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cunningham JT, et al. mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1alpha transcriptional complex. Nature. 2007;450:736–740. doi: 10.1038/nature06322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bentzinger CF, et al. Differential response of skeletal muscles to mTORC1 signaling during atrophy and hypertrophy. Skelet. Muscle. 2013;3:6. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-3-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bentzinger CF, et al. Skeletal muscle-specific ablation of raptor, but not of rictor, causes metabolic changes and results in muscle dystrophy. Cell Metab. 2008;8:411–424. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baraldo M, et al. Skeletal muscle mTORC1 regulates neuromuscular junction stability. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:208–225. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Augusto V, Padovani CR, Campos GER. Skeletal muscle fiber types in C57Bl6J mice. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 2004;21:89–94. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang Y, et al. Coordinated regulation of protein synthesis and degradation by mTORC1. Nature. 2014;513:440–443. doi: 10.1038/nature13492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jung CH, Ro SH, Cao J, Otto NM, Kim DH. mTOR regulation of autophagy. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:1287–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Masiero E, et al. Autophagy is required to maintain muscle mass. Cell Metab. 2009;10:507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCarthy JJ, Srikuea R, Kirby TJ, Peterson CA, Esser KA. Correction: inducible Cre transgenic mouse strain for skeletal muscle-specific gene targeting. Skelet. Muscle. 2012;2:22. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-2-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.You, J. S. et al. A DGKzeta-FoxO-ubiquitin proteolytic axis controls fiber size during skeletal muscle remodeling. Sci. Signal.11, eaao6847 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.You JS, Frey JW, Hornberger TA. Mechanical stimulation induces mTOR signaling via an ERK-independent mechanism: implications for a direct activation of mTOR by phosphatidic acid. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.You JS, Anderson GB, Dooley MS, Hornberger TA. The role of mTOR signaling in the regulation of protein synthesis and muscle mass during immobilization in mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2015;8:1059–1069. doi: 10.1242/dmm.019414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.