Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Apr 12;4(4):e215697. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5697

Postoperative In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With COVID-19 Infection Compared With Patients Without COVID-19 Infection

Max R Haffner 1,, Hai V Le 1, Augustine M Saiz Jr 1, Gloria Han 1, Jeffrey Fine 2, Philip Wolinsky 1, Eric O Klineberg 1
PMCID: PMC8042521  PMID: 33844002

Abstract

This cohort study uses the Vizient Clinical Data Base to compare the postoperative in-hospital morbidity and mortality of surgical patients with COVID-19 infection with patients without COVID-19 infection.

Introduction

Several small studies have suggested that patients with positive test results for COVID-19 infection may experience worse perioperative outcomes and increased mortality after surgery.1,2,3,4,5,6 However, those studies were underpowered and lacked generalizability and comparative cohorts.1,2,3,4,5,6 This study used data from a national database to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical patients testing positive for COVID-19 infection with those of a matched sample of surgical patients testing negative for COVID-19 infection. Elucidating the comparative surgical risk profiles of patients with and without COVID-19 infection would help health care systems to improve preoperative guidelines and clinicians to better inform patients in shared medical decision making before surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of hospital discharge data from the Vizient Clinical Data Base (Vizient Inc). Patients 18 years or older with and without COVID-19 infection who underwent surgery from April 1 through November 30, 2020, were matched on a 1:1 ratio based on age and case mix index. Procedures among all surgical specialties were included. Patients who underwent gynecologic, obstetrical, or minor procedures (eg, tracheostomy, percutaneous cardiovascular procedures) were excluded. Inpatient mortality, complications listed in the Vizient Clinical Data Base, patient safety indicators, hospital-acquired conditions, and length of stay were compared between the cohorts. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare outcomes among public, private, and nonprofit hospital systems. The University of California, Davis Institutional Review Board approved the study and waived patient informed consent because the data were deidentified. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

The χ2 or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the association between COVID-19 status and, if death occurred, the presence of complications listed in the Vizient Clinical Data Base and patient safety indicators. The Mann-Whitney test was performed to evaluate whether a difference in length of stay based on COVID-19 status existed. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc). Hypothesis tests were 2-sided and evaluated at a significance level of P < .05.

Results

A total of 5470 surgical patients with positive COVID-19 test results were matched with 5470 surgical patients with negative COVID-19 test results during the same study period. Among all hospitals, there were more than double the number of deaths reported in the cohort of patients with COVID-19 (811 [14.8%]) compared with the cohort of patients without COVID-19 (388 [7.1%]) (P < .001). The rates of complications listed in the Vizient Clinical Data Base (818 [15.0%] vs 760 [13.9%]; P = .11) and median length of stay (10.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.3-36.4] vs 10.7 [IQR, 1.0-558.0] days; P = .86) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, hospital-acquired conditions (110 [2.0%] vs 46 [0.8%]; P < .001) and patient safety indicators (183 [3.3%] vs 129 [2.4%]; P = .002) were higher in patients with COVID-19 (Table 1).

Table 1. Patient Characteristics, Frequencies, and χ2 Test P Values by COVID-19 Status.

Characteristic COVID-19 status, No. (%) P valuea
Negative (n = 5470) Positive (n = 5470)
Patient death
Yes 388 (7.1) 811 (14.8) <.001
No 5082 (92.9) 4659 (85.2)
Complications
Yes 760 (13.9) 818 (15.0) .11
No 4710 (86.1) 4652 (85.0)
Hospital-acquired conditions
Yes 46 (0.8) 110 (2.0) <.001
No 5424 (99.2) 5360 (98.0)
Patient safety indicators
Yes 129 (2.4) 183 (3.3) .002
No 5341 (97.6) 5287 (96.7)
Length of stay, median (IQR), d 10.7 (1.0-558.0) 10.0 (1.3-36.4) .86

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

a

Mann-Whitney test P value for surgical patients by COVID-19 status.

Within each hospital ownership type (public, private, nonprofit), more deaths occurred in the group with COVID-19 compared with the group without COVID-19 in public hospitals (146 [15.8%] vs 46 [4.8%]; P < .001) and nonprofit hospitals (631 [14.7%] vs 326 [7.5%]; P < .001), but not in private hospitals (34 [14.1%] vs 16 [9.4%]; P = .15). Among surgical patients with COVID-19, there were no differences in mortality rates, complications listed in the Vizient Clinical Data Base, hospital-acquired conditions, or patient safety indicators among public, private, or nonprofit hospitals (Table 2).

Table 2. Patient Characteristics, Frequencies, and χ2 Test P values by COVID-19 Status and Hospital Type.

Characteristic Hospital type P valueb
Public (n = 1890) Private (n = 412) Nonprofit (n = 8638)
COVID-19 status, No. (%) P valuea COVID-19 status, No. (%) P valuea COVID-19 status, No. (%) P valuea
Negative (n = 968) Positive (n = 922) Negative (n = 171) Positive (n = 241 Negative (n = 4331 Positive(n = 4307
Patient death
Yes 46 (4.8) 146 (15.8) <.001 16 (9.4) 34 (14.1) .15 326 (7.5) 631 (14.7) <.001 .62
No 922 (95.2) 776 (84.2) 155 (90.6) 207 (85.6) 4005 (92.5) 3676 (85.4)
Complications
Yes 119 (12.3) 132 (14.3) .20 24 (14.0) 33 (13.7) .92 617 (14.2) 653 (15.2) .23 .69
No 849 (87.7) 790 (85.7) 147 (86.0) 208 (86.3) 3714 (85.8) 3654 (84.8)
HACs
Yes 10 (1.0) 16 (1.7) .19 2 (1.2) 6 (2.5) .34 34 (0.8) 88 (2.0) <.001 .72
No 958 (99.0) 906 (98.3) 169 (98.8) 235 (97.5) 4297 (99.2) 4219 (98.0)
PSIs
Yes 34 (3.5) 24 (2.6) .25 5 (2.9) 9 (3.7) .65 90 (2.1) 150 (3.5) <.001 .38
No 934 (96.4) 898 (97.4) 166 (97.1) 232 (96.3) 4241 (97.9) 4157 (96.5)
Length of stay, median (IQR), d 11.7 (2.2-29.4) 9.5 (1.0-95.0) <.001 12.8 (3.7-22.7) 9.0 (1.0-64.0) <.001 10.2 (1.3-36.4) 11.0 (1.0-558.0) <.001 <.001

Abbreviations: HACs, hospital-acquired conditions; IQR, interquartile range; PSIs, patient safety indicators.

a

Mann-Whitney test P value for surgical patients by COVID-19 status and hospital type.

b

Compares only surgical patients with COVID-19 by hospital type.

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study of 10 940 surgical patients, the findings suggest that COVID-19 infection positivity was an independent risk factor for increased perioperative mortality but not complications. Specifically, the overall mortality rate in the cohort with COVID-19 (14.8%) was more than double that in the cohort without COVID-19 (7.1%). To our knowledge, this study represents the largest comparative cohort study between surgical patients testing positive for COVID-19 and those testing negative for the virus, and it is the first to compare outcomes among different hospital settings. This study has 2 main limitations. Patient outcomes could not be compared by clinical severity of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, we could not determine specific types of surgery or whether the surgery was elective, urgent, or emergent.

Our study findings suggest that COVID-19 infection positivity is an independent risk factor for surgical mortality. In addition to using scarce medical resources and placing health care workers at risk of exposure, surgery for patients with COVID-19 poses a safety risk given the increased mortality rate observed in this study. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues and surges, we need to balance patients’ surgical needs with COVID-19–specific risks in the setting of a strained health care system. Surgical patients with COVID-19 should be informed of their higher in-hospital mortality risk. More important, postponing surgery should be recommended for patients with a positive preoperative COVID-19 test result when possible unless surgical intervention is absolutely necessary for life- or limb-saving measures.

References

  • 1.Cheung ZB, Forsh DA. Early outcomes after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients in New York City. J Orthop. 2020;21:291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mi B, Chen L, Xiong Y, Xue H, Zhou W, Liu G. Characteristics and early prognosis of COVID-19 infection in fracture patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(9):750-758. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nahshon C, Bitterman A, Haddad R, Hazzan D, Lavie O. Hazardous postoperative outcomes of unexpected COVID-19 infected patients: a call for global consideration of sampling all asymptomatic patients before surgical treatment. World J Surg. 2020;44(8):2477-2481. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05575-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muñoz Vives JM, Jornet-Gibert M, Cámara-Cabrera J, et al. ; Spanish HIP-COVID Investigation Group . Mortality rates of patients with proximal femoral fracture in a worldwide pandemic: preliminary results of the Spanish HIP-COVID observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(13):e69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jonker PKC, van der Plas WY, Steinkamp PJ, et al. ; Dutch Surgical COVID-19 Research Collaborative . Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infections increase mortality, pulmonary complications, and thromboembolic events: A Dutch, multicenter, matched-cohort clinical study. Surgery. 2021;169(2):264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.COVIDSurg Collaborative . Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396(10243):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES