Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1999 Mar 1;40(1):11–21. doi: 10.1186/BF03547037

Comparison Between a Live, Attenuated Anticoccidial Vaccine and an Anticoccidial Ionophore, on Performance of Broilers Raised with or without a Growth Promoter, in an Initially Eimeria-Free Environment

Effekten av ett levande koccidievaccin på produktionsresultaten hos slaktkycklingar, uppfödda med eller utan foderantibiotika, i en miljö fri från naturliga koccidier

L Waldenstedt 1,✉, A Lundén 2, K Elwinger 1, P Thebo 2, A Uggla 2
PMCID: PMC8043159  PMID: 10418192

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to study the effects of vaccination with Paracox®, a live, attenuated vaccine against avian coccidiosis, on broilers isolated from extraneous Eimeria parasites. The study involved 3200 broiler chickens raised in floor pens similar to commercial conditions, but in an initially Eimeria-free environment. Forty percent of the chickens were vaccinated at 3 days of age and given either a basal unmedicated feed or a feed supplemented with the feed antibiotic virginiamycin. Unvaccinated birds were given either the basal feed or feed supplemented either with virginiamycin or the anticoccidial ionophore narasin. At slaughter at 36 days of age vaccinated birds had a lower live weight than non-vaccinated birds. The difference was 4.6% in unmedicated, and 6.0% in virginiamycin medicated chickens. Feed conversion ratio at slaughter was 2.5% higher for unmedicated vaccinated birds, and 1.3% higher for virginiamycin medicated vaccinated birds, compared to respective non-vaccinated groups. There was no significant difference in overall performance of unvaccinated birds given narasin as compared to virginiamycin. At 10 days post vaccination vaccinated birds had a higher number of Clostridium perfringens in the caeca, but there was no difference thereafter. Throughout the experiment, caecal clostridial counts were considerably higher in vaccinated unmedicated birds than in unvaccinated birds given narasin. The number of oocysts shed in the vaccinated groups was very low, but during a subsequent challenge with E. maxima and E. tenella the birds’ immunity was found to be satisfactory.

Keywords: vaccination, coccidia, parasites, Clostridium perfringens, Paracox®

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

References

  1. Baba E, Yasuda T, Fukata T, Arakawa A. Effect of Eimeria tenella infection on the caecal population of linomycin-resistant Clostridium perfringens introduced into chickens. Res. Vet. Sci. 1988;45:219–221. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)30934-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branton SL, Lott BD, Deaton JW, Maslin WR, Austin FM, Pote LM, Keirs RW, Latour MA, Day EJ. The effect of added complex carbohydrates or added dietary fiber on necrotic enteritis lesions in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 1997;76:24–28. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branton SL, Reece FN, Hegler WM. Influence of a wheat diet on mortality of broiler chickens associated with necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci. 1987;66:1326–1330. doi: 10.3382/ps.0661326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conway DP, McKenzie ME, Dayton AD. Relationship of coccidial lesion scores and weight gain in infections. Avian Pathology. 1990;19:489–496. doi: 10.1080/03079459008418702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutta GN, Devriese LA. Susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens of animal origin to fifteen antimicrobial agents. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1980;3:227–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1980.tb00487.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elwinger K, Engström B, Berndtson E, Fossum O, Waldenstedt L: Effect of growth promoters and coccidiostats on performance and growth of Clostridium perfringens in the caeca of broilers. Proceedings of XX World’s Poultry Congress, New Dehli, India, 2–5 September 1996, Vol. 4, p. 219 (abs).
  7. Elwinger K, Engström B, Fossum O, Hassan S, Teglöf B. Effect of coccidiostats on necrotic enteritis and performance in broiler chickens. Swedish J. agrie. Res. 1994;24:39–44. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elwinger K, Schneitz C, Berndtson E, Fossum O, Teglöf B, Engström B. Factors affecting the incidence of necrotic enteritis, caecal carriage of Clostridium perfringens and bird performance in broiler chicks. Acta. vet. scand. 1992;33:369–378. doi: 10.1186/BF03547304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ficken MD: Necrotic enteritis. In: Diseases of Poultry, B. W. Calnek (ed.), 9th edition, 1991, 264– 267. Wolfe Publishing Ltd., London.
  10. Johnson J, Reid WM. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 1970;28:30–36. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(70)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klasing KC, Laurin DE, Peng RK, Fry DM. Immunologically mediated growth depression in chicks: influence on feed intake, corticosterone and interleukine-1. J. of Nutrition. 1987;87:1629–1637. doi: 10.1093/jn/117.9.1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kondo F. In vitro lecithinase activity and sensitivity to 22 antimicrobial agents of Clostridium perfringens isolated from necrotic enteritis of broiler chickens. Res. Vet. Sci. 1988;45:337–340. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)30961-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKenzie, ME, Conway DP, Dayton DA: Relationship of weight gain and lesion scores as measures of ionophore effectiveness in broilers infected with Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella. In: Coccidia and intestinal cocciomorphs, Vth International Coccidiosis Conference. P. Yvore (ed.) INRA, France, 1989, 317– 322.
  14. Nordic Committee on Food Analyses: NMKL Method No. 95: Clostridium perfringens-determination in foods, 2nd edition, Ord och Form, Uppsala, Sweden, 1985.
  15. Riddell C, Kong XM. The influence of diet on necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 1992;36:499–503. doi: 10.2307/1591740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT® User’s guide, Release 6.08. SAS Institute Inc., 1994, Cary, N. C. USA.
  17. Shirley MW: Eimeria and Isospora; Eimeria species and strains of chicken. In: European Commission: EUR 16602 – Guidelines on Techniques in Coccidiosis Research. J. Eckert, R. Braun, M. W. Shirley and P. Coudert (eds.) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 1995, 1–24.
  18. Shirley MW, Long PL: Control of coccidiosis: immunizations with live vaccines. In: Coccidiosis of Man and Domestic Animals. P. L. Long (ed.), CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA. 1990, 321–342
  19. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical Methods, 6th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. 1968.
  20. Stutz MW, Lawton GC. Effects of diet and antimicrobials on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal Clostridium perfringens and ileal weight of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 1984;63:2036–2042. doi: 10.3382/ps.0632036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor M, Catchpole J, Marshall R, Norton CC, Green J: Eimeria and Isospora, 1.2 Eimeria species of sheep. In: European Commission: EUR 16602 – Guidelines on Techniques in Coccidiosis Research. J. Eckert, R. Braun, M. W. Shirley and P. Coudert (eds.) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 1995, 25–39.
  22. Thebo P, Lundén A, Uggla A, Hooshmand-Rad P: Identification of seven Eimeria species in Swedish domestic fowl. Avian Pathology, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Waldenstedt L, Elwinger K. Effects of the coccidiostat narasin (Monteban) on growth of broiler chickens in an Eimeria-free environment. Arch. für Gflknd, Sonderheft. 1995;1:61–62. [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams RB: The development, efficacy and epidemiological aspects of Paracox™, a new coccidiosis vaccine for chickens. Mallinckrodt Veterinary Ltd., Breakspear Road South, Harefield, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB9 6SL, United Kingdom. 1992, 16p.
  25. Williams RB. Safety of the attenuated anticoccidial vaccine “Paracox” in broiler chickens isolated from extraneous coccidial infection. Vet. Res. Com. 1994;18:189–198. doi: 10.1007/BF01839268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES