Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2021 Apr 6:2021.04.05.438500. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2021.04.05.438500

An Autoantigen-ome from HS-Sultan B-Lymphoblasts Offers a Molecular Map for Investigating Autoimmune Sequelae of COVID-19

Julia Y Wang 1,*, Wei Zhang 2, Victor B Roehrl 1, Michael W Roehrl 1, Michael H Roehrl 3,4,*
PMCID: PMC8043459  PMID: 33851168

Abstract

To understand how COVID-19 may induce autoimmune diseases, we have been compiling an atlas of COVID-autoantigens (autoAgs). Using dermatan sulfate (DS) affinity enrichment of autoantigenic proteins extracted from HS-Sultan lymphoblasts, we identified 362 DS-affinity proteins, of which at least 201 (56%) are confirmed autoAgs. Comparison with available multi-omic COVID data shows that 315 (87%) of the 362 proteins are affected in SARS-CoV-2 infection via altered expression, interaction with viral components, or modification by phosphorylation or ubiquitination, at least 186 (59%) of which are known autoAgs. These proteins are associated with gene expression, mRNA processing, mRNA splicing, translation, protein folding, vesicles, and chromosome organization. Numerous nuclear autoAgs were identified, including both classical ANAs and ENAs of systemic autoimmune diseases and unique autoAgs involved in the DNA replication fork, mitotic cell cycle, or telomerase maintenance. We also identified many uncommon autoAgs involved in nucleic acid and peptide biosynthesis and nucleocytoplasmic transport, such as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. In addition, this study found autoAgs that potentially interact with multiple SARS-CoV-2 Nsp and Orf components, including CCT/TriC chaperonin, insulin degrading enzyme, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, and the ezrin-moesin-radixin family. Furthermore, B-cell-specific IgM-associated ER complex (including MBZ1, BiP, heat shock proteins, and protein disulfide-isomerases) is enriched by DS-affinity and up-regulated in B-cells of COVID-19 patients, and a similar IgH-associated ER complex was also identified in autoreactive pre-B1 cells in our previous study, which suggests a role of autoreactive B1 cells in COVID-19 that merits further investigation. In summary, this study demonstrates that virally infected cells are characterized by alterations of proteins with propensity to become autoAgs, thereby providing a possible explanation for infection-induced autoimmunity. The COVID autoantigen-ome provides a valuable molecular resource and map for investigation of COVID-related autoimmune sequelae and considerations for vaccine design.

Keywords: Autoantigens, autoantibodies, autoimmunity, SARS-CoV-2, COVID, Epstein-Barr virus

Introduction

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has caused the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic with hundreds of millions infected and high morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of patients who have recovered from the acute viral infection of COVID-19 continue to suffer from lingering health problems, so called “long COVID” syndrome. It is yet unknown how long the COVID aftereffects will persist, and more importantly, what the underlying causative mechanisms of long COVID syndrome are. The acute phase of COVID-19 is accompanied by various autoimmune responses, and autoimmune diseases, which tend to be chronic and debilitating, are major concerns of COVID-19 sequelae. To understand how SARS-CoV-2 infection may induce autoimmunity and how diverse the autoimmune disorders could be, we have started to compile a comprehensive atlas of COVID autoantigens (autoAgs) and autoantibodies (autoAbs), the root elements of autoimmunity [1, 2].

We have developed a unique DS-affinity enrichment strategy for autoAg discovery [18]. We discovered that dermatan sulfate (DS), a glycosaminoglycan that is abundant in skin and soft connective tissues and that is involved in wound healing and tissue repair, has affinity to autoAgs [3, 4]. Because of this affinity, DS binds autoAgs to form non-covalent DS-autoAg complexes, which transforms non-antigenic singular self-molecules into antigenic non-self-complexes [3]. DS-autoAg complexes are capable of engaging autoreactive B-cell receptors (autoBCRs) via a two-step process: (i) DS-autoAg complexes bind autoBCRs on autoreactive B1-cells via autoAg-autoBCR specificity; (ii) DS enters cells by (DS-autoAg)-autoBCR complex internalization and recruits a cascade of molecules to stimulate autoreactive B1-cells [3, 5]. In particular, DS recruits GTF2I that is required for IGH gene expression and IgH-associated multiprotein complexes in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to facilitate autoAb production [5]. Therefore, any self-molecule with DS-affinity has a propensity to be transformed by DS into an autoantigenic DS-autoAg complex [5]. Based on this unifying principle of DS-autoAg affinity, we have discovered and catalogued known and putative autoAgs from different cells and organs [1, 2, 68].

Autoantibodies, which target autoAgs, have been found in a significant portion of COVID-19 patients. In a cohort study of 147 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, autoAbs are detected in ~50% of the patients, and antinuclear autoAbs are detected in ~25% of patients, with the target autoAgs associated with myositis, systemic sclerosis, and connective tissue disease overlap syndromes [9]. In another study of 987 COVID-19 patients with life-threatening pneumonia, over 10% developed autoAbs against interferons, which likely neutralized their ability to block SARS-CoV-2 infection [10]. Although COVID-19 is typically mild or asymptomatic in children, multisystem inflammatory syndrome and multiple autoAbs developed in a portion of infected children [11, 12]. In a study of COVID-19 patients with unexplained neurological symptoms, anti-neuronal autoAbs were detected in sera or cerebrospinal fluid of all patients [13]. Antinuclear autoAbs, the most frequently tested autoAbs in clinical screening for autoimmune diseases such as lupus, Sjögren syndrome, scleroderma, or polymyositis, are found in 20–50% of COVID-19 patients [1416].

Viral infections have long been regarded as culprits of autoimmune diseases. However, it has remained unclear how infections induce autoimmune diseases. In this study, we investigated HS-Sultan cells, a B-cell lymphoblast line isolated from Burkitt’s lymphoma of a 7-year-old boy. HS-Sultan cells are infected with and immortalized by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and carry the viral DNA sequence. From the proteome extracts of HS-Sultan cells, we identified a putative DS-affinity autoantigen-ome of 362 proteins, of which 201 are confirmed autoAgs by means of corresponding specific autoAbs reported in the literature. By comparing this autoantigen-ome with proteins affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection derived from multi-omic studies compiled in Coronascape [1738], we identified 315 DS-affinity proteins and 186 confirmed autoAgs. When host cells are infected, numerous molecules undergo significant changes via altered expression, modification, or degradation. When the infected cells die, these altered molecules are released, and those with DS-affinity may become associated with DS and transform into immunogenic autoAg-DS complexes. This study illustrates that viral infections can profoundly change the host cell autoantigen-ome, result in a large repertoire of potential autoAgs, and may consequently lead to autoimmune disease.

Results and Discussion

DS-affinity autoantigen-ome of HS-Sultan cells

HS-Sultan cells were cultured, harvested, and lysed. Total proteins were extracted from lysates and fractionated on DS-Sepharose affinity resins. Proteins with no or weak DS-affinity were removed from the resins with 0.2 M NaCl, and those with intermediate to strong DS-affinity were eluted first with 0.5 M and then with 1.0 M NaCl. Proteins in the DS-affinity fractions were collected, desalted, digested, and sequenced by mass spectrometry. A total of 362 proteins were identified, with the majority present in the 0.5 M NaCl elution. Proteins that eluted with 1.0 M NaCl possess very strong DS-affinity and include some of the classical nuclear autoAgs, e.g., histones, TOP1, Sm-D3, and 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0. Other proteins with strong DS-affinity include both known autoAgs (vimentin, ATP synthetase ATP5B, and PABPC1) and unknown ones (RPL10A, L15, RPS27A, and mitochondrial single-stranded DNA binding protein SSBP1).

Of the 362 DS-affinity proteins identified from HS-Sultan cells, 201 (55.5%) are confirmed humoral autoAgs based on prior literature reports of specific autoantibodies (see references in Table 1). These autoAgs and their respective autoantibodies are found in a wide spectrum of autoimmune diseases and cancer. The number of actual autoAgs is likely much greater, as most of the unconfirmed proteins have structural resemblance to known autoAgs. For example, SSBP1 is structurally and functionally similar to the classical lupus autoAg SSB, but it has not formally been identified as an autoAg. As another example, nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1 and 4 (NAP1L1, NAP1L4) are identified by DS-affinity but unconfirmed as autoAgs, whereas their close relative NAP1L3 has been reported as an autoAg. Due to the structural similarity of many DS-affinity proteins with known autoAgs, it is likely that there are additional yet-to-be discovered (considered putative) autoAgs in this group.

Table 1.

DS-affinity autoantigens from HS-Sultan cells and their alteration in COVID-19

Number of Peptides Protein Alteration in COVID (up and/or down) SARS-CoV-2 interaction DS-affinity (1.0 M) DS-affinity (0.5 M) Ref.
6 AARS Alanine-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic u d + [1]
15 ACLY ATP-citrate synthase u d + [2]
9 ACTA2 Actin, aortic smooth muscle u d + [3]
6 ACTB Actin, cytoplasmic 1 u d + [4]
7 ACTBL2 Beta-actin-like protein 2 u d + [4]
8 ACTN1 Alpha-actinin-1 (f-actin cross linking protein) u d + [5]
7 ACTN4 Alpha-actinin-4 u d + [5]
2 ACTR2 Actin-related protein 2 u d + [6]
2 ACTR3 Actin-related protein 3 u + [7]
3 AFP Alpha-fetoprotein d + [8]
15 AHCY Adenosylhomocysteinase d +
4 AHSA1 Activator of 90 kDa heat shock protein ATPase homolog 1 d +
5 ALDH18A1 Delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase d +
3 ALDOA Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A u d + [9]
4 ALDOC Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase C u d + [10]
2 ANP32A Acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member A u d +
4 ANP32B Acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member B d N + [11]
2 ANP32C Acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member C +
8 ANXA5 Annexin A5 u d + [12]
5 ANXA6 Annexin A6 u d + [13]
4 APEH Acylamino-acid-releasing enzyme +
2 APEX1 DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase u d + [14]
2 API5 Apoptosis inhibitor 5 d +
8 ARF1 ADP-ribosylation factor 1 Nsp6 +
6 ARHGDIA Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 1 u d +
8 ARHGDIB Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 d + [15]
3 ARPC2 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 2 d +
2 ASNS Asparagine synthetase [glutamine-hydrolyzing] u +
14 ATIC Bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein, PURH + [16]
13 ATP5F1B ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial, ATP5B u d Nsp6 + [17]
3 ATXN10 Ataxin-10, Spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 protein u d +
2 BZW1 Basic leucine zipper and W2 domain-containing protein 1 u +
3 BZW2 Basic leucine zipper and W2 domain-containing protein 2 N +
2 C1QBP Complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein d + [18]
8 CALM1 Calmodulin u d + [19]
13 CALR Calreticulin u d + [20]
15 CAND1 Cullin-associated NEDD8-dissociated protein 1 +
6 CAP1 Adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 u d +
3 CAPN1 Calpain-1 catalytic subunit +
2 CAPRIN1 Caprin-1, Cell cycle associated protein 1 d +
3 CAPZA1 F-actin capping protein subunit alpha-1 (capz alpha-1) d + [21]
3 CAPZB F-actin-capping protein subunit beta d + [22]
10 CCT2 T-complex protein 1 subunit beta (tcp-1-beta) (cct-beta) d Nsp12
Orf8
Orf9b
Orf10
+ [23]
6 CCT3 T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma (chaperonin containing TCP1, subunit 3 isoform) u Orf8
Orf10
+ [24]
6 CCT4 T-complex protein 1 subunit delta (tcp-1-delta) (cct-delta) (stimulator of tar rna-binding) u + [24]
10 CCT5 T-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon (tcp-1-epsilon) (cct-epsilon) u d Nsp1
Nsp12
Orf8
Orf10
+ [23]
7 CCT6A T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta (acute morphine dependence-related protein 2) u d Nsp1
Nsp12
Orf10
+ [23]
5 CCT7 T-complex protein 1 subunit eta (hiv-1 nef-interacting protein) Orf10 + [23]
20 CCT8 T-complex protein 1 subunit theta u d Nsp1
Nsp12
Nsp14
+ [24]
4 CDC37 Hsp90 co-chaperone, hsp90 chaperone protein kinase-targeting u d Nsp16 +
6 CLIC1 Chloride intracellular channel protein 1 u d Nsp16 + [25]
12 CLTC Clathrin heavy chain 1 u d + [26]
4 CLTCL1 Clathrin heavy chain 2 +
4 CLUH Clustered mitochondria protein homolog (mRNA-binding) d Nsp7
Nsp16
+
2 CMPK1 UMP-CMP kinase d +
3 CNDP2 Cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase u Orf3
Orf10
+
2 CNPY2 Protein canopy homolog 2, MSAP, TMEM4, Zsig9 d Orf3a +
2 C0PZ1 Coatomer subunit zeta-1 d +
12 C0R01A Coronin-1A u + [27]
3 CPNE1 Copine-1 +
4 CPNE3 Copine-3 u d +
3 CS Citrate synthase, mitochondrial u d + [2]
10 CSE1L Exportin-2 d +
4 CSK Tyrosine-protein kinase CSK d + [28]
6 DARS Aspartate-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic, DARS1 + [29]
3 DCK Deoxycytidine kinase u +
3 DCTN2 Dynactin subunit 2 Orf6 +
3 DCTPP1 dCTP pyrophosphatase 1 d +
7 DDB1 DNA damage-binding protein 1 u d + [26]
4 DDX39A ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX39A u d +
3 DDX39B Spliceosome RNA helicase DDX39B d +
2 DDX5 Probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase, RNA helicase p68 u d + [30]
2 DHX15 Pre-mRNA-splicing factor ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX15 d +
3 DHX9 ATP-dependent RNA helicase A + [31]
3 DIABL0 Diablo homolog, mitochondrial u d Nsp6
Nsp15
+
4 DLD Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, mitochondrial + [32]
2 DNAJC8 DnaJ homolog subfamily C member 8 u +
4 DNPH1 2’-deoxynucleoside 5’-phosphate N-hydrolase 1 u +
6 DPP3 Dipeptidyl-peptidase 3 d +
5 DUT Deoxyuridine 5’-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase, mitochondrial u d +
2 EEF1A1 Elongation factor 1-alpha u d + [33]
4 EEF1A2 Elongation factor 1-alpha 2 u Orf3 + [34]
2 EEF1B2 Elongation factor 1-beta d +
5 EEF1D Elongation factor 1-delta d + [35]
6 EEF1G Elongation factor 1-gamma u d +
17 EEF2 Elongation factor 2 u d + [36]
2 EFTUD2 U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein component 116 kda d + [37]
3 EIF2A Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit alpha, EIF2S1 +
5 EIF3A Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit A u d Nsp1 + [38]
5 EIF3B Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit B u d Nsp1 +
2 EIF3C Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit C d Nsp1 [39]
3 EIF3E Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit E (viral integration site protein int-6 homolog) u d Nsp1 + [40]
4 EIF3F Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F u d Nsp1 +
2 EIF3I Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit I d Nsp1 + [39]
10 EIF3L Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L (subunit E interacting protein) d Nsp1 +
19 EIF4A1 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-I u d +
4 EIF4A3 Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-III + [41]
2 EIF5 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 u d + [42]
5 EIF5A Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-1 u d + [42]
2 EIF6 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 u +
3 ELAVL1 ELAV-like protein 1 d + [43]
3 EN02 Gamma-enolase u d + [44]
2 EPRS Bifunctional glutamate/proline-tRNA ligase u + [45]
4 ER01L ER01-like protein alpha d Orf3a +
4 ETF1 Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 u +
14 EZR Ezrin u d S + [46]
3 FARSB Phenylalanine-tRNA ligase beta subunit + [47]
19 FASN Fatty acid synthase u d + [48]
2 FDPS Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthetase like-4 protein d +
2 FEN1 Flap endonuclease 1 u d +
2 FERMT3 Fermitin family homolog 3 u +
11 FKBP4 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP4, FKBP-52 Nsp12 + [49]
2 FKBP5 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP5 (FK506-binding protein) u +
2 FUBP1 Far upstream element-binding protein 1 u d +
2 G6PD Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase u d + [50]
5 GANAB Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB d Orf6
Orf8
Orf9c
+ [51]
6 GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase u d Orf8 + [52]
4 GARS Glycine-tRNA ligase, GARS1 u + [53]
2 GART Trifunctional purine biosynthetic protein adenosine-3 d Nsp15 +
2 GBE1 1,4-alpha-glucan-branching enzyme u +
8 GDI1 Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha u d + [54]
10 GDI2 Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta u d Nsp12
Orf9b
+ [55]
2 GGCT Gamma-glutamylcyclotransferase, cytochrome c-releasing factor 21 u +
3 GL01 Lactoylglutathione lyase d Orf3 + [56]
3 GLRX3 Glutaredoxin-3 d +
10 GLUD1 Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial + [57]
2 GMFB Glia maturation factor, beta u +
3 GSPT1 Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor GTP-binding subunit ERF3A +
3 GSS Glutathione synthetase d +
2 GTF2I General transcription factor II-I u d +
3 H2AFV Histone H2A.V, H2AZ2 u d + [58]
2 H2AFY2 Core histone marco-H2A.1, MARC0H2A1 + [59]
3 HARS Histidine-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic + [19]
3 HDGF Hepatoma-derived growth factor, hmg-1l2 u d + [60]
5 HIST1H1C Histone 1.2, H1–2 u d Nsp8 + [61]
2 HIST1H2AB Histone H2A type 1-B/E, H2AC4 d + [62]
2 HIST1H2BL Histone H2B type 1-L, H2BC13 u + [63]
14 HIST1H4J Histone H4, H4C1 + [64]
9 HIST2H2BE Histone H2B type 2-E, H2BC21 u d + [65]
5 HIST2H3A Histone H3.2, H3C15 u d + [66]
4 HMGB1 High mobility group protein 1-like 10 (hmg-1l10) d + [60]
3 HMGCS1 Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, cytoplasmic u d +
4 HNRNPA1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 u d + [67]
8 HNRNPA2B1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 u d + [68]
2 HNRNPA3 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3 u d + [69]
2 HNRNPAB Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A/B d + [69]
3 HNRNPC Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C1/C2 u d + [70]
5 HNRNPCL1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C-like 1 + [70]
5 HNRNPD Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D + [71]
2 HNRNPDL Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D-like u d + [72]
3 HNRNPF Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F d + [73]
2 HNRNPH1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H (hnrnp h) u d + [74]
9 HNRNPK Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (transformation up-regulated nuclear protein) u + [75]
5 HNRNPR Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R u d + [76]
2 HNRNPU Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U u d + [77]
6 HPRT1 Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase +
16 HSP90AA1 Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha (hsp 86) (ny-ren-38 antigen) u d [78]
6 HSP90AA2 Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha A2 u + [79]
16 HSP90AB1 Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta (hsp 84) (hsp 90) u d Nsp12 + [80]
19 HSP90B1 Endoplasmin, GRP94, tumor rejection antigen 1 u d Orf3a
Orf9c
+ [79]
4 HSPA4 Heat shock 70 kda protein 4 u d + [81]
15 HSPA5 Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone, GRP78, BiP u d S
E
M
Nsp2
Nsp4
Nsp6
Orf3a
Orf7a
Orf7b
+ [82]
24 HSPA8 Heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein u d Nsp2
Nsp12
+ [83]
12 HSPA9 Stress-70 protein, mitochondrial (grp 75) u d N + [84]
19 HSPD1 60 kda heat shock protein, mitochondrial matrix protein p1 u d + [85]
4 HSPH1 Heat shock protein 105 kD u + [86]
2 IDE Insulin-degrading enzyme Nsp4
Nsp12
Nsp14
Nsp15
Nsp16
Orf3b
+
2 IDH3A Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit alpha, mitochondrial +
6 ILF2 Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2 u + [87]
6 IP05 Importin-5, KPNB3, RANBP5 + [88]
3 IP07 Importin-7, RANBP7 Nsp6
Orf9c
+ [89]
8 IQGAP1 Ras GTPase-activating-like protein IQGAP1 u + [90]
4 KARS Lysine-tRNA ligase, KARS1 Nsp7 + [45]
3 KHSRP Far upsteam element-binding protein 2 (KH-type splicing regulatory protein) u d +
2 KPNA2 Importin subunit alpha-1 d Orf6 +
11 KPNB1 Importin subunit beta-1 + [88]
30 LCP1 Plastin-2 (l-plastin) (lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1) u d + [91]
7 LDHA L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain (proliferation-inducing gene 19 protein) u d Nsp12 + [92]
10 LDHB L-lactate dehydrogenase B chain u d Nsp12
Nsp7
+ [93]
16 LRPPRC leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein d + [94]
7 MCM2 DNA replication licensing factor MCM2 d + [95]
3 MCM3 DNA replication licensing factor mcm3 (dna polymerase alpha holoenzyme-associated protein p1)(p102 protein) (p1-mcm3) u d + [95]
3 MCM4 DNA replication licensing factor mcm4 (cdc21 homolog) (p1-cdc21) u d + [95]
2 MCM6 DNA replication licensing factor mcm6 (p105mcm) u d + [95]
2 ME2 NAD-dependent malic enzyme, mitochondrial u d Nsp15 +
6 MSN Moesin u S
Nsp6
Orf3
+ [96]
2 MYG1 UPF0160 protein MYG1, mitochondrial, C12orf10 +
4 MZB1 Marginal zone B- and B1-cell-specifc protein (Proapoptotic caspase adapter protein, plasma cell-induced resident protein) +
3 NAA15 N-alpha-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit (NMDA receptor-regulated protein, NARG1) d +
2 NAA25 N-alph-acetyltransferase 25, NatB auxiliary subunit (TPR repeat-containing protein C12orf30) +
3 NACA Nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha (nac-alpha) u d + [97]
7 NAP1L1 Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1 (nap-1-related protein)(hnrp) d +
4 NAP1L4 Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 4 (nucleosome assembly protein 2) u d +
5 NARS Asparagine-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic, NARS1 d + [98]
4 NASP Nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (histone binding protein) u d + [99]
12 NCL Nucleolin u d + [100]
8 NME1 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase A d + [101]
15 NPEPPS Puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase +
4 NPM1 Nucleophosmin u d Orf9c + [102]
3 NSFL1C NSFL1 cofactor p47 u +
8 NUDC Nuclear migration protein nudC (nuclear distribution protein c homolog) d Nsp12 +
2 NUDT21 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 5 d +
2 NUDT3 Diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohydrolase +
4 NUDT5 ADP-sugar pyrophosphatase (nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety x motif 5) (nudix motif 5) d +
2 0TUB1 Ubiquitin thioesterase protein 0TUB1 +
5 P4HB Protein disulfide-isomerase (cellular thyroid hormone-binding protein) (p55) u d Nsp7
Orf3b
+ [103]
14 PA2G4 Proliferation-associated protein 2G4 u +
9 PABPC1 Polyadenylate-binding protein 1 d N + [104]
2 PAFAH1B2 Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit beta u d +
2 PAFAH1B3 Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit gamma u Nsp12
Nsp5
Orf3b
+
6 PAICS Multifunctional protein ADE2 d +
2 PARP1 Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 u d +
8 PCNA Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (cyclin) u d + [52]
2 PDCD10 Programmed cell death protein 10 +
21 PDIA3 Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 u d M
Orf3a
Orf3b
Orf8
Orf9c
+ [105]
8 PDIA4 Protein disulfide-isomerase A4 (protein erp-72) (erp72) u d Nsp16
Nsp7
Orf3b
+ [106]
5 PDIA6 Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 (protein disulfide isomerase p5) (thioredoxin domain-containing protein 7) u d + [103]
7 PFAS Phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase Nsp12
Nsp15
Nsp16
Nsp7
+
3 PFDN2 Prefoldin subunit 2 u Nsp12
Nsp15
Orf10
+ [107]
2 PFDN3 Prefoldin subunit 3, von hippel-lindau-binding protein 1, VBP1 d Nsp12
Nsp15
+
9 PFN1 Profilin-1 (profilin i) u d + [95]
4 PGAM1 Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 u d + [108]
4 PGAM2 Phosphoglycerate mutase 2 +
3 PGLS 6-phosphogluconolactonase u +
3 PHGDH D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase u d + [109]
10 PLCG2 1-phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase gamma-2 u +
2 PMPCB Mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit beta d M +
8 PPA1 Inorganic pyrophosphatase u Orf3 + [110]
3 PPAT Amidophosphoribosyltransferase d +
6 PPIB Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase B u d Orf8 + [111]
2 PPP1R7 Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7 (protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 7) (protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 22) u +
3 PPP2R1A Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 65 kDa regulatory subunit A alpha isoform d +
3 PRDX1 Peroxiredoxin-1 u d + [112]
5 PRDX3 Thioredoxin-dependent peroxide reductase, mitochondrial u d + [113]
2 PRKCSH Glucosidase 2 subunit beta (protein kinase c substrate) d S
Nsp6
Orf3
Orf3a
+
2 PRMT1 Protein arginine n-methyltransferase 1 (hnRNP methyltransferase-like 2 isoform (ec 2.1.1.-) (interferon receptor 1-bound protein 4) d + [114]
2 PRPSAP2 Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase-associated protein 2 u +
3 PSMA1 Proteasome subunit alpha type-1 d Orf3b + [115]
2 PSMA2 Proteasome subunit alpha type-2 d +
6 PSMA3 Proteasome subunit alpha type-3 (macropain subunit c8) u d Nsp2
Nsp4
Nsp7
Nsp10
Nsp12
+ [116]
5 PSMA4 Proteasome subunit alpha type-4 (C9) u + [117]
5 PSMA5 Proteasome subunit alpha type-5 (macropain zeta chain) u Orf3b + [118]
8 PSMA6 Proteasome subunit alpha type-6 u d Orf3b +
4 PSMA7 Proteasome subunit alpha type-7 u d + [119]
5 PSMB1 Proteasome subunit beta type-1 + [120]
3 PSMB3 Proteasome subunit beta type-3 (proteasome theta chain) d Orf3b + [116]
7 PSMB4 Proteasome subunit beta type-4 (proteasome beta chain) (macropain beta chain) (multicatalytic endopeptidase complex beta chain) Orf3b +
2 PSMB6 Proteasome subunit beta type-6 (proteasome delta chain)(multicatalytic endopeptidase complex delta chain) d Orf3b +
3 PSMB7 Proteasome subunit beta type-7 (proteasome subunit z) d + [121]
3 PSMB8 Proteasome subunit beta type-8 u d +
4 PSMB9 Proteasome subunit beta type-9 u d +
2 PSMC3 26S protease regulatory subunit 6A d Orf6 +
5 PSMD1 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1 u d Nsp7
Orf6
Orf8
+
9 PSMD11 Proteasome 26S non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11 u +
3 PSMD12 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12 d +
2 PSMD14 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 +
8 PSMD3 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3 d +
3 PSMD6 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6 +
11 PSME1 Proteasome activator complex subunit 1 u Nsp15 +
8 PSME2 Proteasome activator complex subunit 2 u +
4 PSME3 Proteasome activator complex subunit 3 d Nsp16 + [122]
2 PSPH Phosphoserine phosphatase +
3 PTBP1 Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 u d + [123]
2 PTBP3 Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (cDNA FLJ51619, highly similar to Regulator of differentiation) ROD1 u d +
2 PTGES3 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 (telomerase-binding protein p23) (hsp90 co-chaperone) (progesterone rec) d +
2 PTPN6 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 6 u d +
2 PUS1 tRNA pseudouridine synthase A +
5 RAB7A Ras-related protein Rab-7a u d Nsp7
Orf3
Orf7b
+
2 RAD23A UV excision repair protein RAD23 homolog A d + [124]
3 RANBP1 RanBP u d +
2 RANBP6 Ran-binding protein 6 d Orf7a +
7 RDX Radixin, isoform CRA (actin binding to plasma membrane) u d Nsp13 + [125]
2 RPL10A 60S ribosomal protein L10a +
2 RPL11 60S ribosomal protein L11 u +
2 RPL15 60S ribosomal protein L15 d +
2 RPL22 60s ribosomal protein L22 (Epstein-Barr virus small rna-associated protein)(heparin-binding protein hbp15) d + [121]
4 RPLP0 60s acidic ribosomal protein P0 u d + [126]
2 RPS15A 40s ribosomal protein S15a u
2 RPS25 40S ribosomal protein S25 u d Orf8 +
3 RPS27A Ubiquitin-40S ribosomal protein S27a u d S
Nsp4
+ [121]
6 RPS3 40S ribosomal protein S3 u d Orf8 + [127]
3 RPS3A 40S ribosomal protein S3a u d Orf8 +
3 RPS7 40S ribosomal protein S7 u d +
5 RPSA similar to 40S ribosomal protein SA (p40) (34/67 kDa laminin receptor) (Colon carcinoma laminin-binding protein) (NEM/1CHD4) (Multidrug resistance-associated protein MGr1-Ag), RPSAP12 +
6 RUVBL1 RuvB-like 1, tata box-binding protein-interacting protein, nuclear matrix protein 238 Nsp1
Nsp7
Nsp12
Orf9b
+ [128]
5 RUVBL2 RuvB-like 2 d Nsp1
Nsp7
Nsp12
+ [129]
2 SARS Serine-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic, SARS1 Nsp15 +
2 SEPT11 Septin-11 d +
2 SEPT2 Septin-2, NEDD5, DIFF6 + [130]
3 SEPT7 Septin-7 d + [131]
8 SERPINB9 Serpin B9 u d +
2 SERPINC1 Antithrombin-III u +
6 SET Protein SET (phosphatase 2a inhibitor i2pp2a) (i-2pp2a) (template-activating factor i) (taf-i) (hla-dr-associated protein ii) (phapii) u d + [132]
3 SF3B3 Splicing factor 3B subunit 3 + [133]
2 SFPQ Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich u d + [134]
3 SGTA Small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein alpha u d M +
2 SHMT1 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase, cytosolic d +
9 SHMT2 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase, mitochondrial d +
2 SLIRP SRA stem-loop-interacting RNA-binding protein, mitochondrial u d +
8 SND1 Staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1 u d +
2 SNRNP70 U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 70 kDa u d + [135]
3 SNRPA U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A u + [136]
3 SNRPA1 U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A′ + [137]
2 SNRPD1 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D1 u + [138]
2 SNRPD2 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D2 d + [139]
2 SNRPD3 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm d3 (snrnp core protein d3) (sm-d3) d + [138]
2 SNRPE Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E d + [140]
2 SPTAN1 Spectrin alpha chain, non-erythrocytic 1 u d + [141]
3 SRM Spermidine synthase d +
3 SRP14 Signal recognition particle 14 kDa protein u d Nsp13
Orf8
+
3 SRSF1 Serine/argine-rich splicing factor 1 (Isoform ASF-1 of Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich u d + [142]
3 SRSF2 Arginine/serine-rich splicing factor 2, SFRS2 u d + [143]
3 SSB Lupus La protein (Sjoegren syndrome type b antigen) (La/SSB) u d + [144]
4 SSBP1 Single-stranded DNA-binding protein, mitochondrial N +
4 ST13 Hsc70-interacting protein (hip) (suppression of tumorigenicity protein 13) (putative tumor suppressor st13) (protein fam10a1) (progesterone receptor-associate) u Nsp12
Orf3b
Orf6
Orf8
Orf10
+ [145]
3 STIP1 Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 u d Nsp12
Orf3a
Orf8
E
+
2 SUGT1 Protein SGT1 homolog (Suppressor of G2 allele of SKP1 homolog) u Nsp12
Nsp15
+
2 SWAP70 Switch-associated protein 70 d Nsp2 +
5 SYNCRIP Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein Q d +
2 TALDO1 Transaldolase u d + [146]
3 TBCA Tubulin-specific chaperone A Nsp11 +
3 TCL1A T-cell leukemia/lymphoma protein 1A u d +
7 TCP1 T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha (tcp-1-alpha) (cct-alpha) d Orf10 + [23]
10 TLN1 Talin-1 u d + [147]
5 TNPO1 Transportin-1 +
2 TOP1 DNA topoisomerase 1 (Scl 70) u + [148]
5 TPM1 Tropomyosin alpha-1 chain isoform u d Nsp9 + [149]
6 TPM3 Tropomyosin alpha-3 chain (tropomyosin gamma) u d + [150]
5 TPM4 Tropomyosin alpha-4 chain u d + [151]
4 TPP2 Tripeptidyl-peptidase 2 +
3 TTLL12 Tubulin-tyrosine ligase-like protein 12 d + [152]
2 TTLL3 Tubulin monoglycylase TTLL3 u +
4 TUBA1C TUBA1C protein u d + [153]
12 TUBA4A Tubulin alpha-4A chain u d + [154]
5 TUBB Tubulin beta chain u d + [155]
4 TUBB1 Tubulin beta-1 chain + [156]
2 TUBB4 Tubulin beta-3 chain, beta-4 chain u d + [157]
12 TUBB4B Tubulin beta-4B chain (Tubulin beta-2C chain) u d + [156]
2 TXNDC17 Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 17 u d +
4 TXNRD1 Thioredoxin reductase 1, cytoplasmic u d + [158]
2 U2AF2 Splicing factor U2AF 65 kDa subunit d +
7 UBA1 Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1 (Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1) u d + [159]
2 UBA6 Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 6 Nsp7 +
2 UBE2K Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 K +
3 USP5 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 5 u d +
3 VARS1 Valine-tRNA ligase +
12 VCP Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase (valosin-containing protein) u d + [160]
10 VIM Vimentin u d + [161]
6 WARS Tryptophan-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic, WARS1 u d + [162]
2 XPNPEP1 Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase 1 d +
4 XPO1 Exportin-1 Nsp4
Orf7a
+
5 XPOT Exportin-T (trna exportin) (exportin(trna)) u Orf7a +
3 XRCC5 X5-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5, lupus ku86 ku80 autoantigen d + [163]
9 XRCC6 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 (ku70) u d + [164]
6 YARS Tyrosine-tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic, YARS1 u d + [165]
5 YWHAB 14-3-3 protein beta/alpha (protein kinase c inhibitor protein 1) u d +
12 YWHAE 14-3-3 protein epsilon u d + [166]
3 YWHAG 14-3-3 protein gamma u d + [166]
3 YWHAH 14-3-3 protein eta (protein as1) d + [167]
3 YWHAQ 14-3-3 protein theta u d + [168]
7 YWHAZ 14-3-3 protein zeta/delta u d + [169]
2 ZPR1 Zinc finger protein ZPR1 u d + [170]

The DS-affinity autoantigen-ome, which includes confirmed and putative autoAgs, is not a random collection of proteins but functionally highly connected. As shown by protein-protein interaction analysis, the DS-affinity autoantigen-ome possesses significantly more interactions than expected (3,105 interactions at high confidence level vs. 1,249 expected; PPI enrichment p-value <1.0E-16). Based on Gene Ontology (GO) biological process analysis, the DS-affinity autoantigen-ome of HS-Sultan cells is significantly associated with RNA slicing, translation, peptide biosynthesis, protein folding, proteolysis, biosynthesis and metabolism of nucleobase-containing small molecules (e.g., nucleobase, nucleoside, and nucleotide phosphate), cytoskeleton organization, and chromosome organization (Fig. 1). Pathway and process enrichment analysis reveals that it is also significantly associated with neutrophil degranulation, nucleocytoplasmic transport, kinase maturation complex, metabolic reprogramming, and IL-12 mediated signaling (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The autoantigen-ome of HS-Sultan cells identified by DS-affinity. Marked proteins are associated with peptide biosynthesis and catabolic process (58 proteins, yellow), protein folding (34 proteins, light green), RNA splicing (41 proteins, red), nucleobase-containing small molecule metabolic process (39 proteins, blue), proteolysis (55 proteins, pink), import into nuclear (13 proteins, dark green), cytoskeleton organization (39 proteins, amber), and chromosome organization (40 proteins, aqua).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Top 20 enriched pathways and processes among COVID-altered autoAgs. Top: Pathways of 362 proteins identified by DS-affinity from HS-Sultan cells. Bottom: Pathways of 316 DS-affinity proteins that are altered in COVID.

The DS-affinity autoantigen-ome is dominated by several families of proteins. There are 24 proteasomal proteins, 22 spliceosome proteins, 14 hnRNPs, 13 aminoacyl-tRNA synthases (ligases), 13 translation initiation factors subunits, 12 ribosomal proteins, 10 heat shock proteins, 9 actin and actin-related proteins, 9 tubulins, 8 histones, 8 snRNPs, 7 T-complex proteins (CCT/TriC), 6 elongation factor subunits, and 6 14-3-3 proteins. The majority of the proteins in these families have been reported as autoAgs (Table 1). For example, all hnRNP and snRNP proteins identified by DS-affinity in this study are among the best-known nuclear autoAgs. Interestingly, autoAgs included in clinical diagnostic autoimmune disease ANA screening panels, such as SSB (lupus La), SNRPD1 (Sm D1), SNRPD3 (Sm D3), histones, and TOP1, are all identified in this study by DS-affinity enrichment from HS-Sultan cells.

In addition to proteins, such as ribosomal and ribonucleoproteins, that can be consistently identified from a variety of cell types, HS-Sultan B lymphoblast cells give rise to a large number of unique DS-affinity protein categories. In particular, many proteins associated with biomolecule biosynthesis are identified. Among them are proteins involved in inosine monophosphate and purine nucleotide biosynthesis (ATIC, GART, HPRT1, PAICS, PFAS, PPAT, SHMT1), amino acid biosynthesis (CS, IDH3A, PHGDH, PGAM1, PGAM2, PSPH), and carbohydrate biosynthesis and catabolic processes (ALDOA, ALDOC, ENO2, G6PD, GBE1, LDHA, TALDO1). There are also proteins involved in protein transport (ARF1, CSE1L, GDI1, GDI2, HMGB1, IPO5, KPNA2, RAB7A, RANBP1, RANBP6, SRP14, TNPO1, XPOT), dephosphorylation (NSF1C, PPP1R7, PPP2R1A, SET, SWAP70), and ubiquitination and de-ubiquitination (OTUB1, SHMT2, UBA1, UBA6, UBE2K, USP5). 17 of these 44 proteins are currently known autoAgs, while the remainder await further investigation. Overall, HS-Sultan cells appear to be especially rich in biosynthetic protein machinery, which may explain the rapid proliferation of these cells in Burkitt lymphoma.

Thirteen aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases were identified by DS-affinity from HS-Sultan cells, including AARS, DARS, ERPS, FARSB, GARS, HARS, KARS, NARS, PUS1, SARS, VARS, WARS, and YARS. Ten of these are already known autoAgs (Table 1), although we suspect that the remainder will also likely be autoAgs. This group of proteins are the culprits of antisynthetase syndrome, an autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibodies against one or multiple tRNA synthetases. Antisynthetase syndrome is a chronic disorder that can affect many parts of the body, with common symptoms including myositis, interstitial lung disease, polyarthritis, skin thickening and cracking of fingers and toes, or Raynaud disease. Antisynthetase syndrome has been reported in a case report of COVID-19 interstitial lung disease [39].

HS-Sultan cells are B lymphoblasts immortalized by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and carry viral DNA sequences. Using DS-affinity, we identified numerous proteins involved in DNA repair and the mitotic cell cycle, including CLTC, DCTN2, MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM6, NSF1C, PNCA, PPAT, and SUGT1. Using DS-affinity, we also identified many proteins associated with telomerase maintenance, including TCP1, CCT2, CCT4, CCT5, CCT7, HNRNPA1, HNRPNA2B1, HNRNPC, HNRNPD, HNRNPU, HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1, PARP1, PTGES3, and XRCC5. Telomerase maintenance, which counteracts DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis, is crucial for immortalization of cells with unlimited proliferative potential. Of these 25 proteins, 19 are known autoAgs, which indicates that proteins involved in telomerase maintenance, DNA repair, and cell cycle may be affected by EBV infection and become autoantigenic.

DS-affinity autoantigen-ome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection

To find out whether DS-affinity autoAgs are affected in SARS-CoV-2 infection, we conducted similarity searches with currently available multi-omic COVID-19 data compiled in Coronascape (as of 02/22/2021) [1738]. Among our 362 DS-affinity proteins, 315 (87.0%) are affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 1). Of these 315 proteins, 209 are up-regulated and 248 are down-regulated at protein and/or mRNA levels, and 95 are in the interactomes of individual SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins. Because the COVID-19 multi-omics data have been obtained with various methods from different infected cells or patients, there are proteins found up-regulated in some studies but down-regulated in other studies, but nevertheless, these proteins are affected by the infection and thus considered COVID-affected in our analysis (Supplemental Table 1). Of the 315 COVID-affected DS-affinity proteins, 186 (59.0%) are thus far confirmed autoAgs, while 129 are putative autoAgs (Table 1).

The COVID-affected DS-affinity proteins are highly connected (Fig. 3). By STRING analysis, these 315 proteins exhibit 2,507 interactions at high confidence level, which is significantly higher than randomly expected (1,002 interactions) with PPI enrichment p-value <1.0E-16. The proteins are primarily associated with RNA and mRNA processing, translation, vesicles, and vesicle-mediated transport (Fig. 3), which is consistent with our findings in other cell types [1, 2, 8]. In addition, these proteins are enriched in protein folding, peptide biosynthesis, granulocyte activation, emerin complex, IL-12 mediated signaling pathway, CDC5L complex, and metabolic reprogramming (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

COVID-affected proteins shared with the HS-Sultan autoantigen-ome. Marked proteins are associated with RNA splicing (36 proteins, blue), translation (39 proteins, red), vesicle (77 proteins, green) and vesicle-mediated transport (62 proteins, dark green).

Twenty-one COVID-affected DS-affinity proteins are associated with mRNA splicing, including heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP A1, A2B1, A3, AB, C, DL, F, H1, K, Q, R, and U), small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (SNRNP70, SNRPA, SNRPE, SNRPD1, SNRRPD2, SNRPD3), and splicing factors (SRSF1, SRSF2, SFPQ), all of which are well-known autoAgs.

Phosphorylation and ubiquitination changes induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection are posttranslational molecular alterations that may transform native proteins into potential autoAgs (Fig. 4), which is consistent with our previous findings [2]. Phosphorylation changes affected 80 COVID-altered DS-affinity proteins, including 8 hnRNPs, 4 initiation factors (EIF3A, 3B, 5), 3 elongation factors, 3 replication licensing factors (MCM2, 3, 4), SSB, XRCC6, and GTF2I. These phosphoproteins are associated with mRNA splicing, translation, telomere maintenance, DNA conformation change, and pre-replicative complex assembly. Ubiquitination changes affected 101 COVID-altered DS-affinity proteins, including 8 heat shock proteins, 5 initiation factors (EIF3E, 3F, 3I, 4A1, 5A), 4 CCT units, 4 14-3-3 proteins, 3 elongation factors, 3 histones, and 2 MCMS. These ubiquitinated proteins are associated with the nucleobase-containing compound catabolic process, RNA metabolism, cellular response to stress, prefoldin mediated transfer of substrate to CCT/TriC, and axon guidance.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

DS-affinity proteins that are altered by phosphorylation or ubiquitination in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Marked proteins are associated with gene expression (red) and transport (blue).

AutoAgs that interact with SARS-CoV-2 components

There are 95 DS-affinity proteins found in the interactomes of various SARS-CoV-2 proteins (Fig. 5), meaning that these proteins can interact directly or indirectly with viral components. They appear to be intimately involved in protein metabolism, including 17 proteins related to peptide biosynthesis, 25 related to protein folding, 29 related to protein localization, and 22 related to proteolysis. In addition, these proteins are associated with the symbiont viral process, translational initiation, protein deubiquitination, protein stabilization, and posttranslational protein modification.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

DS-affinity proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 interactomes. Total: marked proteins are involved in protein folding (25 proteins, red), peptide biosynthetic process (17 proteins, green), protein localization (29 proteins, blue), or proteolysis (22 proteins, pink). Orf3b: proteolysis (pink). Orf3a: endoplasmic reticulum (dark purple). Orf9b: nuclear function of prefoldin (amber), AAA+ ATPase domain or P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase (dark green). Nsp15: prefoldin-mediated transfer of substrate to CCT/TriC (yellow), nucleotide binding (dark green). Orf10: protein folding (red), CCT chaperonin (yellow). Orf8: protein folding (red), SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane (blue), CCT chaperonin (yellow). Nsp1: translation initiation (green), CCT chaperonin (yellow). Nsp12: protein folding (red), multi-organism process (aqua), CCT chaperonin (yellow).

The chaperonin-containing T-complex (CCT), also known as T-complex protein ring complex (TriC), is the chaperonin of eukaryotic cells. The human CCT/TriC complex is a two-ring barrel-like complex formed by 8 similar but distinct subunits. Remarkably, all 8 CCT subunits are identified by DS-affinity, and 7 of them are found in the SARS-CoV-2 interactomes: CCT2 (interacts with Nsp12, Orf8, Orf9b, Orf10), CCT5 (with Nsp1, Nsp12, Orf8, Orf10), CCT6A (with Nsp1, Nsp12, Orf10), CCT8 (with Nsp1, Nsp12, Nsp14), CCT3 (with Orf8, Orf10), TCP1 (with Orf10), and CCT7 (with Orf10). In total, 6 SARS-CoV-2 proteins interact with the host cell CCT chaperonin, with Orf10 interacting with 6 CCT subunits (Fig. 5). Furthermore, CCT subunits and PDFN2 (prefoldin subunit 2) are found together in the interactomes of Orf10, Nsp12, and Nsp15. CCTs assist the folding of proteins upon ATP hydrolysis, aiding in the folding of ~10% of the proteome. PDFN2 binds the nascent polypeptide chain and promotes folding in an environment in which there are many competing pathways for nonnative proteins. Therefore, these findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 exploits CCT complex and PDFN2 to ensure competitive folding of nonnative viral proteins in the host cells.

In addition to CCT/TriC, heat shock proteins (HSPs) are another group of chaperones frequently identified with DS-affinity. Ten HSPs are identified in this study, including HSPA4, HSPA5, HSPA8, HSPA9, HSPD1, HSPH1, HSP90AA1, HSP90AA2, HSP90AB1, and HSP9B1. All 10 are known autoAgs (Table 1). HSP8 interacts with Nsp2 and Nsp12. HSP90B1 (endoplasmin) interacts with Orf3a and Orf9c. HSPA9 interacts with N protein. HSP90AB1 interacts with Nsp12. Most strikingly, HSPA5 (GRP78, BiP) interacts with 9 SARS-CoV-2 proteins, including S, E, M, Nsp2, Nsp4, Nsp6, Orf3a, Orf7a, and Orf7b. In addition, CDC37 (Hsp90 co-chaperone, hsp90 chaperone protein kinase-targeting) interacts with Nsp16. ST13 (Hsc70-interacting protein) interacts with 5 SARS-CoV-2 proteins (Nsp12, Orf3b, Orf6, Orf8, and Orf10). STIP1 (stress induced phosphoprotein 1, HSP90AA1 co-chaperone) interacts with 4 viral proteins (Nsp12, Orf3a, Orf8, and E).

The replication machinery of SARS-CoV-2 interacts with 41 different DS-affinity proteins. Nsp12, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and the central component of the replication machinery, interacts with the largest number (i.e., 22) of DS-affinity proteins (Fig. 5). Its cofactor Nsp7 interacts with 12 proteins and Nsp8 interacts with only one. The replication machine also includes a helicase (Nsp13), 2 ribonucleases (Nsp14 and Nsp15), 2 RNA-cap methyltransferases (Nsp14, Nsp16), and cofactor Nsp10. Nsp15 interacts with 10 DS-affinity proteins, Nsp16 interacts with 8 proteins, Nsp13 interacts with SRP14 and RDX, Nsp14 interacts with IDE and CCT8, and Nsp10 interacts with PSMA3. Nsp12-interacting DS-affinity proteins are strongly associated with protein folding, particularly prefoldin mediated transfer of substrates to CCT complex and cooperation of prefoldin and CCT in protein folding (Fig. 5). Nsp15-interacting proteins are also associated with prefoldin-mediated substrate transfer to CCT. DS-affinity proteins interacting with other individual viral replication components have no clear biological associations.

Orf3b of SARS-CoV-2 interacts with 12 DS-affinity proteins, including 6 proteasomal proteins, 3 protein disulfide-isomerases, IDE, ST13, and PAFAH1B3 (Fig. 5). Orf3a interacts with 7 proteins, including STIP1 (stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1) and 6 ER proteins (HSPA5, HSP90B1, CNPY2, ERO1L, PRKCSH, and PDIA3). CANPY2 prevents MIR-mediated MRLC ubiquitination and its subsequent proteasomal degradation. ERO1L (or ERO1A) is an oxidoreductase in disulfide bond formation in the ER. PRKCSH (glucosidase II subunit beta) cleaves sequentially the 2 innermost glucose residues from the Glc2Man9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide precursor of immature glycoproteins. Based on the normal functions of their interacting proteins, Orf3a and Orf3b appear to affect host stress response and protein processing in the ER.

The S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is found to interact with HSPA5 (GRP78/BiP), PRKCSH, PRS27A (ubiquitin-40S ribosomal protein), MSN, and EZR. EZR and MSN are members of the ezrin-moesin-radixin (ERM) family, and its third member RDX is found to interact with Nsp13 of the virus. Moesin is localized to filopodia and other membranous protrusions that are important for cell-cell recognition, and ERM proteins connect the plasma membranes to the actin-based cytoskeleton. Actin and cytoskeleton proteins have been consistently found to be altered in SARS-CoV-2 infection in our previous studies [1, 2], and this finding suggests that ERM proteins facilitate the viral trafficking from host cell membrane to the cytoskeleton. All three ERM proteins are confirmed autoAgs.

Nsp1 is a major virulence factor of coronavirus. COVID-19 patients with autoantibodies are found to have higher levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 protein [9]. Nsp1 has been reported to hijack the host 40S ribosome by inserting its C terminus into the mRNA entry tunnel, which effectively blocks RGI-dependent innate immune responses [40]. In this study, we found that Nsp1 interacts with 7 subunits of the translation initiation factor 3 complex (EIF3 A, B, C, E, F, I, L). EIF3 complex binds the 40S ribosome and serves as a scaffold for other initiation factors, auxiliary factors, and mRNA. Hence, our study extends previous reported activities of Nsp1 and shows that Nsp1 engages both the 40S ribosome and EIF3 to manipulate host protein translation.

A few interesting SARS-CoV-2-interacting DS-affinity proteins may provide clues to potential COVID-19 symptoms. PAFAH1B3 is a catalytic unit of the platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase complex and plays important roles in platelet activation regulation and brain development, and it interacts with Nsp12, Nsp5, and Orf3b. Another subunit, PAFAH1B2, is altered in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both this and our previous studies [2] have identified PAFAH1B2 and B3 as potential COVID-altered autoAgs, and their roles in COVID coagulopathy merit further investigation.

IDE (insulin degrading enzyme) is a ubiquitously expressed metalloprotease that degrades insulin, beta amyloid, and others. IDE interacts with 6 SARS-CoV-2 proteins (Nsp4, Nsp12, Nsp14, Nsp15, Nsp16, and Orf3b). Although its role in COVID remains unknown, IDE has been partially characterized in other viral infections. It is one of the host factors of hepatitis C virus [41], and it degrades HIV-1 p6 Gap protein and regulates virus replication in an Env-dependent manner [42]. In varicella zoster virus infection, the viral gE protein precursor associates with IDE, HSPA5, HSPA8, HSPD1, and PPIA in the ER of infected cells [43]. Interestingly, this group of ER proteins is also identified in this study, although we identified PPIB instead of PPIA. Although IDE has not yet formally been described as an autoAg, we have identified IDE in this and another study [2], and its importance for COVID-19 and autoimmunity merits further investigation.

DS-affinity and B-cell-specific IgH-ER complex

Because HS-Sultan cells are derived from B lymphoblasts infected by Epstein-Barr virus, we compared the DS-affinity autoantigen-ome with single-cell mRNA expression profiles of B-cells from 7 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 [23]. We identified 39 DS-affinity proteins that are up-regulated at mRNA level in COVID B-cells, which include 7 heat shock proteins, 6 proteasomal proteins, 4 protein disulfide-isomerases, HDGF (heparin binding growth factor), CLIC1, CPNE3, SND1, TALDO1, TCL1A, and others (Fig. 6). These up-regulated proteins are primarily associated with protein processing in the ER and the proteasome. We also identified 21 DS-affinity proteins that are down-regulated in COVID B-cells, including 4 translation elongation factors, 2 translation initiation factors, 2 hnRNPs, 2 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, NACA, NAP1L1, and PABPC1. These down-regulated proteins are primarily associated with gene expression (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

DS-affinity proteins from HS-Sultan cells that are up-regulated or down-regulated in B-cells of COVID-19 patients. Top: 39 up-regulated proteins. Red: protein processing in ER. Blue: proteasome. Bottom: 21 down-regulated proteins. Aqua: proteins involved in gene expression.

In particular, MZB1 (marginal zone B- and B1-cell-specific protein) is found up-regulated in B-cells from 5 of the 7 COVID-19 patients. MZB1 is a B-cell-specific ER-localized protein that is most abundantly expressed in marginal zone B-cells and B1-cells [44]. These cells are also termed innate-like B cells. They differ from follicular B-cells by their attenuated Ca2+ mobilization, fast antibody secretion, and increased cell adhesion. MZB1 plays important roles in humoral immunity and helps diversify peripheral B-cell functions by regulating calcium stores, antibody secretion, and integrin activation. MZB1 mRNA expression was found increased by >2-fold in B-cells of SLE patients with active disease [45]. High MZB1 gene expression predicted adverse prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [46]. High prevalence of MZB1-positive plasma B-cells in tissue fibrosis was found in human lung and skin fibrosis, and MZB1 levels correlated positively with tissue IgG and negatively with diffusion capacity of the lung [47].

MZB1 is part of a B-cell-specific ER chaperone complex, associates with IgM heavy chain (IgH) and HSP90B1 (Grp94), and augments IgM assembly and secretion [48]. MZB1 is also found to augment the function of PDIA3 (ERp57) [44]. In this study, MZB1, HSP90B1, HSPA5 (Grp78, BiP), PDIA4, PDIA6, and CALR are found jointly up-regulated in the B-cells of the same 5 COVID-19 patients. This finding suggests that these 6 proteins are in the same IgH-associated ER complex. In addition, several other up-regulated ER proteins are identified, including HSP90AB1, HSPD1, HSPA8, PDIA3, P4HB, and PPIB.

Interestingly, in our study of murine pre-B1 lymphoblasts, we also found that DS interacts with the same IgH-associated multiprotein complex in the ER [5]. In addition, we had observed that DS interacts directly with GTF2I in murine pre-B1 cells, and GTF2I is also identified by DS-affinity in human B lymphoblast HS-Sultan cells in this study. GTF2I is a required gene transcription factor at the IgH gene locus. Pre-B1 cells, which express precursor B-cell receptors (preBCRs) that are polyreactive and autoreactive, are a critical check point in the development of mature autoreactive B cells. The Ig heavy chain (IgH) repertoire of autoantibodies is determined at the pre-B stage. Our previous findings from pre-B1 cells suggested that DS is a potential master regulator of IgH at both the gene and protein expression levels, i.e., DS recruits GTFI for IgH gene expression and engages IgH-associated ER complex for autoantibody production. The findings from this study provide further support for a key role of DS in regulating autoantibody production and autoreactive B1-cell development. Furthermore, the finding from B-cells of COVID-19 patients point to a potential significance of autoreactive B1 cells in COVID-induced autoimmunity.

Conclusion

Exploiting the affinity between autoAgs and DS glycosaminoglycan, we identified 362 DS-affinity proteins from EBV-immortalized HS-Sultan cells. 201 of these DS-affinity proteins are already known autoAgs in a wide variety of autoimmune diseases and cancer. Of the 362, 315 DS-affinity proteins are affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 186 COVID-affected DS-affinity proteins are known autoAgs. These COVID-altered proteins are largely affected by phosphorylation, ubiquitination, or interaction with viral protein components. They are associated with gene expression, mRNA processing, mRNA splicing, translation, protein folding, DNA replication fork, telomerase maintenance, chromosome organization, biosynthesis and catabolism of nucleobase-containing molecules and proteins, vesicles, and nucleocytoplasmic transport. CCT/TriC chaperonin, insulin degrading enzyme, and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase are found in the interactomes of multiple viral Nsp and Orf proteins. By integrating DS-affinity autoAgs with multi-omic data from COVID, our study suggests that viral infections can cause significant proteomic alterations, give rise to a diverse pool of autoAgs, and may lead to infection-induced autoimmune diseases. The COVID autoantigen-ome provided in this paper may serve as a molecular map and resource for investigating autoimmune phenomena of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its long-term sequelae. Understanding immunogenic proteins of COVID may also enhance vaccine target design.

Materials and Methods

HS-Sultan cell culture

The human B lymphoblast HS-Sultan cell line was obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA) and cultured in complete RPMI-1640 medium. The growth medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and a penicillin-streptomycin-glutamine mixture (Thermo Fisher). The cells were grown at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator, and about 300 million cells were harvested for the study.

Protein extraction

Protein extraction was performed as previously described [4]. In brief, HS-Sultan cells were lysed with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing the Roche Complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail and then homogenized on ice with a microprobe sonicator until the turbid mixture turned nearly clear with no visible cells left. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4 °C for 20 min, and the total protein extract in the supernatant was collected. Protein concentration was measured by absorbance at 280 nm using a NanoDrop UV-Vis spectrometer (Thermo Fisher).

DS-Sepharose resin preparation

The DS-affinity resins were synthesized as previously described [4, 8]. In brief, 20 ml of EAH Sepharose 4B resins (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) were washed with distilled water three times and mixed with 100 mg of DS (Sigma-Aldrich) in 10 ml of 0.1 M MES buffer, pH 5.0. About 100 mg of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N’-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) powder was added, and another 100 mg was added after 8 h of reaction. The reaction proceeded by mixing on a rocker at 25 °C for 16 h. The coupled resins were washed with water and equilibrated with 0.5 M NaCl in 0.1 M acetate (pH 5.0) and 0.5 M NaCl in 0.1 M Tris (pH 8.0).

DS-affinity fractionation

The total proteomes extracted from HS-Sultan cells were fractionated in a DS-Sepharose column in a manner similar to previously described [4]. About 40 mg of proteins in 40 ml of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4; buffer A) were loaded onto the DS-affinity column at a rate of 1 ml/min. Unbound and weakly bound proteins were removed with 60 ml of buffer A and then 40 ml of 0.2 M NaCl in buffer A. The remaining bound proteins were eluted in steps with 40 ml 0.5 M NaCl and then with 40 ml 1.0 M NaCl in buffer A. Fractions were desalted and concentrated with 5-kDa cut-off Vivaspin centrifugal filters (Sartorius). Fractionated proteins were separated in 1-D SDS-PAGE in 4–12% Bis-Tris gels, and the gel lanes were divided into two or three sections for mass spectrometric sequencing.

Mass spectrometry sequencing

Protein sequencing was performed at the Taplin Biological Mass Spectrometry Facility at Harvard Medical School. Proteins in gels were digested with sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega) at 4 °C for 45 min. Tryptic peptides were separated in a nano-scale C18 HPLC capillary column and analyzed in an LTQ linear ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Peptide sequences and protein identities were assigned by matching the measured fragmentation pattern with proteins or translated nucleotide databases using Sequest. All data were manually inspected. Proteins with ≥2 peptide matches were considered positively identified.

COVID data comparison

DS-affinity proteins were compared with currently available COVID-19 multi-omic data compiled in the Coronascape database (as of 02/22/2021) [1738]. These data have been obtained with proteomics, phosphoproteomics, interactome, ubiquitome, and RNA-seq techniques. Up- and down-regulated proteins or genes were identified by comparing cells infected vs. uninfected by SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 patients vs. healthy controls. Similarity searches were conducted to identify DS-affinity proteins that are up- and/or down-regulated in viral infection at any omic level.

Protein network analysis

Protein-protein interactions were analyzed by STRING [49]. Interactions include both direct physical interaction and indirect functional associations, which are derived from genomic context predictions, high-throughput lab experiments, co-expression, automated text mining, and previous knowledge in databases. Each interaction is annotated with a confidence score from 0 to 1, with 1 being the highest, indicating the likelihood of an interaction to be true. Pathways and processes enrichment were analyzed with Metascape [17], which utilize various ontology sources such as KEGG Pathway, GO Biological Process, Reactome Gene Sets, Canonical Pathways, CORUM, TRRUST, and DiGenBase. All genes in the genome were used as the enrichment background. Terms with a p-value <0.01, a minimum count of 3, and an enrichment factor (ratio between the observed counts and the counts expected by chance) >1.5 were collected and grouped into clusters based on their membership similarities. The most statistically significant term within a cluster was chosen to represent the cluster.

Autoantigen literature text mining

Every DS-affinity protein identified in this study was searched for specific autoantibodies reported in the PubMed literature. Search keywords included the MeSH keyword “autoantibodies”, the protein name or its gene symbol, or alternative names and symbols. Only proteins for which specific autoantibodies are reported in PubMed-listed journal articles were considered “confirmed” autoAgs in this study.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (316.3KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Jung-hyun Rho for technical assistance with experiments. We thank Ross Tomaino and the Taplin Biological Mass Spectrometry facility of Harvard Medical School for expert service with protein sequencing.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by Curandis, the US NIH, and a Cycle for Survival Innovation Grant (to MHR). MHR acknowledges NIH/NCI R21 CA251992 and MSKCC Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Footnotes

Competing interest statement

JYW is the founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Curandis. WZ was supported by the NIH and declares no competing interests. MWR and VBR are volunteers of Curandis. MHR is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of Trans-Hit, Proscia, and Universal DX, but these companies have no relation to the study.

References

  • 1.Wang JY, Zhang W, Roehrl MW, Roehrl VB, Roehrl MH. An Autoantigen Atlas from Human Lung HFL1 Cells Offers Clues to Neurological and Diverse Autoimmune Manifestations of COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.01.24.427965. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.24.427965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang JY, Zhang W, Roehrl MW, Roehrl VB, Roehrl MH. An Autoantigen Profile of Human A549 Lung Cells Reveals Viral and Host Etiologic Molecular Attributes of Autoimmunity in COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.02.21.432171. doi: 10.1101/2021.02.21.432171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang JY, Lee J, Yan M, Rho JH, Roehrl MH. Dermatan sulfate interacts with dead cells and regulates CD5(+) B-cell fate: implications for a key role in autoimmunity. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(5):2168–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rho JH, Zhang W, Murali M, Roehrl MH, Wang JY. Human proteins with affinity for dermatan sulfate have the propensity to become autoantigens. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(5):2177–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee J, Rho J-h, Roehrl MH, Wang JY. Dermatan Sulfate Is a Potential Master Regulator of IgH via Interactions with Pre-BCR, GTF2I, and BiP ER Complex in Pre-B Lymphoblasts. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.01.18.427153. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.18.427153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang W, Rho JH, Roehrl MH, Wang JY. A comprehensive autoantigen-ome of autoimmune liver diseases identified from dermatan sulfate affinity enrichment of liver tissue proteins. BMC immunology. 2019;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12865-019-0304-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang W, Rho JH, Roehrl MW, Roehrl MH, Wang JY. A repertoire of 124 potential autoantigens for autoimmune kidney diseases identified by dermatan sulfate affinity enrichment of kidney tissue proteins. PloS one. 2019;14(6):e0219018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang JY, Zhang W, Rho JH, Roehrl MW, Roehrl MH. A proteomic repertoire of autoantigens identified from the classic autoantibody clinical test substrate HEp-2 cells. Clinical proteomics. 2020;17:35. Epub 2020/09/26. doi: 10.1186/s12014-020-09298-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chang SE, Feng A, Meng W, Apostolidis SA, Mack E, Artandi M, et al. New-Onset IgG Autoantibodies in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. 2021. Epub 2021/02/04. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science (New York, NY). 2020;370(6515). Epub 2020/09/26. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Consiglio CR, Cotugno N, Sardh F, Pou C, Amodio D, Rodriguez L, et al. The Immunology of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children with COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183(4):968–81. e7. Epub 2020/09/24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gruber CN, Patel RS, Trachtman R, Lepow L, Amanat F, Krammer F, et al. Mapping Systemic Inflammation and Antibody Responses in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Cell. 2020;183(4):982–95. e14. Epub 2020/09/30. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Franke C, Ferse C, Kreye J, Reincke SM, Sanchez-Sendin E, Rocco A, et al. High frequency of cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020. Epub 2020/12/29. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou Y, Han T, Chen J, Hou C, Hua L, He S, et al. Clinical and Autoimmune Characteristics of Severe and Critical Cases of COVID-19. Clinical and translational science. 2020;13(6):1077–86. Epub 2020/04/22. doi: 10.1111/cts.12805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sacchi MC, Tamiazzo S, Stobbione P, Agatea L, De Gaspari P, Stecca A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection as a trigger of autoimmune response. Clinical and translational science. 2020. Epub 2020/12/12. doi: 10.1111/cts.12953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lerma LA, Chaudhary A, Bryan A, Morishima C, Wener MH, Fink SL. Prevalence of autoantibody responses in acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Transl Autoimmun. 2020;3:100073. Epub 2020/12/03. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang JY, Wang XM, Xing X, Xu Z, Zhang C, Song JW, et al. Single-cell landscape of immunological responses in patients with COVID-19. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(9):1107–18. Epub 2020/08/14. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0762-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Davies JP, Almasy KM, McDonald EF, Plate L. Comparative Multiplexed Interactomics of SARS-CoV-2 and Homologous Coronavirus Nonstructural Proteins Identifies Unique and Shared Host-Cell Dependencies. ACS infectious diseases. 2020;6(12):3174–89. Epub 2020/12/03. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klann K, Bojkova D, Tascher G, Ciesek S, Münch C, Cinatl J. Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Inhibition Prevents SARS-CoV-2 Replication. Molecular cell. 2020;80(1):164–74. e4. Epub 2020/09/03. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun J, Ye F, Wu A, Yang R, Pan M, Sheng J, et al. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Intensive Early Stage Responses of Host Cells to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Frontiers in microbiology. 2020;11:593857. Epub 2020/12/17. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.593857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bojkova D, Klann K, Koch B, Widera M, Krause D, Ciesek S, et al. Proteomics of SARS-CoV-2-infected host cells reveals therapy targets. Nature. 2020;583(7816):469–72. Epub 2020/05/15. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2332-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilk AJ, Rustagi A, Zhao NQ, Roque J, Martínez-Colón GJ, McKechnie JL, et al. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nature medicine. 2020;26(7):1070–6. Epub 2020/06/10. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0944-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lieberman NAP, Peddu V, Xie H, Shrestha L, Huang ML, Mears MC, et al. In vivo antiviral host transcriptional response to SARS-CoV-2 by viral load, sex, and age. PLoS biology. 2020;18(9):e3000849. Epub 2020/09/09. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Riva L, Yuan S, Yin X, Martin-Sancho L, Matsunaga N, Pache L, et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature. 2020;586(7827):113–9. Epub 2020/07/25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2577-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bouhaddou M, Memon D, Meyer B, White KM, Rezelj VV, Correa Marrero M, et al. The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell. 2020;182(3):685–712. e19. Epub 2020/07/10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, Uhl S, Hoagland D, Møller R, et al. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell. 2020;181(5):1036–45. e9. Epub 2020/05/18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shen B, Yi X, Sun Y, Bi X, Du J, Zhang C, et al. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera. Cell. 2020;182(1):59–72. e15. Epub 2020/06/04. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lamers MM, Beumer J, van der Vaart J, Knoops K, Puschhof J, Breugem TI, et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science (New York, NY). 2020;369(6499):50–4. Epub 2020/05/03. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583(7816):459–68. Epub 2020/05/01. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xiong Y, Liu Y, Cao L, Wang D, Guo M, Jiang A, et al. Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients. Emerging microbes & infections. 2020;9(1):761–70. Epub 2020/04/02. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1747363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vanderheiden A, Ralfs P, Chirkova T, Upadhyay AA, Zimmerman MG, Bedoya S, et al. Type I and Type III Interferons Restrict SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Airway Epithelial Cultures. Journal of virology. 2020;94(19). Epub 2020/07/24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00985-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjärvi S, Ambikan AT, Mikaeloff F, Saccon E, et al. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerging microbes & infections. 2020;9(1):1748–60. Epub 2020/07/22. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1799723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stukalov A, Girault V, Grass V, Bergant V, Karayel O, Urban C, et al. Multi-level proteomics reveals host-perturbation strategies of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2020:2020.06.17.156455. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.17.156455 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Emanuel W, Kirstin M, Vedran F, Asija D, Theresa GL, Roberto A, et al. Bulk and single-cell gene expression profiling of SARS-CoV-2 infected human cell lines identifies molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.05.05.079194. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.05.079194 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Sun W, Ding B, Zhao Y, et al. Urine Proteome of COVID-19 Patients. medRxiv. 2020:2020.05.02.20088666. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.02.20088666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liao M, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wen Y, Xu G, Zhao J, et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nature medicine. 2020;26(6):842–4. Epub 2020/05/14. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0901-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Laurent EMN, Sofianatos Y, Komarova A, Gimeno J-P, Tehrani PS, Kim D-K, et al. Global BioID-based SARS-CoV-2 proteins proximal interactome unveils novel ties between viral polypeptides and host factors involved in multiple COVID19-associated mechanisms. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.08.28.272955. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.28.272955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alfraji N, Mazahir U, Chaudhri M, Miskoff J. Anti-synthetase syndrome: a rare and challenging diagnosis for bilateral ground-glass opacities-a case report with literature review. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2021;21(1):11. Epub 2021/01/08. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01388-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thoms M, Buschauer R, Ameismeier M, Koepke L, Denk T, Hirschenberger M, et al. Structural basis for translational shutdown and immune evasion by the Nsp1 protein of SARS-CoV-2. Science (New York, NY). 2020;369(6508):1249–55. Epub 2020/07/19. doi: 10.1126/science.abc8665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li Q, Zhang YY, Chiu S, Hu Z, Lan KH, Cha H, et al. Integrative functional genomics of hepatitis C virus infection identifies host dependencies in complete viral replication cycle. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(5):e1004163. Epub 2014/05/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hahn F, Schmalen A, Setz C, Friedrich M, Schlößer S, Kölle J, et al. Proteolysis of mature HIV-1 p6 Gag protein by the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) regulates virus replication in an Env-dependent manner. PloS one. 2017;12(4):e0174254. Epub 2017/04/08. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carpenter JE, Jackson W, de Souza GA, Haarr L, Grose C. Insulin-degrading enzyme binds to the nonglycosylated precursor of varicella-zoster virus gE protein found in the endoplasmic reticulum. Journal of virology. 2010;84(2):847–55. Epub 2009/10/30. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01801-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Flach H, Rosenbaum M, Duchniewicz M, Kim S, Zhang SL, Cahalan MD, et al. Mzb1 protein regulates calcium homeostasis, antibody secretion, and integrin activation in innate-like B cells. Immunity. 2010;33(5):723–35. Epub 2010/11/26. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Yoshifuji H, Kitagori K, Ito S, Oku T, Hirayama Y, et al. Increase of MZB1 in B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: proteomic analysis of biopsied lymph nodes. Arthritis research & therapy. 2018;20(1):13. Epub 2018/02/01. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1511-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Herold T, Mulaw MA, Jurinovic V, Seiler T, Metzeler KH, Dufour A, et al. High expression of MZB1 predicts adverse prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and is associated with a unique gene expression signature. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2013;54(8):1652–7. Epub 2012/11/30. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.753445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schiller HB, Mayr CH, Leuschner G, Strunz M, Staab-Weijnitz C, Preisendörfer S, et al. Deep Proteome Profiling Reveals Common Prevalence of MZB1-Positive Plasma B Cells in Human Lung and Skin Fibrosis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017;196(10):1298–310. Epub 2017/06/28. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2263OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rosenbaum M, Andreani V, Kapoor T, Herp S, Flach H, Duchniewicz M, et al. MZB1 is a GRP94 cochaperone that enables proper immunoglobulin heavy chain biosynthesis upon ER stress. Genes & development. 2014;28(11):1165–78. Epub 2014/06/04. doi: 10.1101/gad.240762.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D607–D13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References for Table 1

  • 1.Saunders RD, Nakajima ST, Rai SN, Pan J, Gercel-Taylor C, Taylor DD. Alterations in antibody subclass immune reactivity to trophoblast-derived fetal fibronectin and α2-macroglobulin in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68(5):438–49. Epub 2012/09/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01182.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Petrohai A, Nagy G, Bosze S, Hudecz F, Zsiros E, Paragh G, et al. Detection of citrate synthase-reacting autoantibodies after heart transplantation: an epitope mapping study. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 2005;17(12):834–40. Epub 2005/02/16. doi: 10.1007/s00147-004-0794-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mande PV, Parikh FR, Hinduja I, Zaveri K, Vaidya R, Gajbhiye R, et al. Identification and validation of candidate biomarkers involved in human ovarian autoimmunity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):471–83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van Beers JJ, Schwarte CM, Stammen-Vogelzangs J, Oosterink E, Bozic B, Pruijn GJ. The rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid citrullinome reveals novel citrullinated epitopes in apolipoprotein E, myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen, and beta-actin. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2013;65(1):69–80. doi: 10.1002/art.37720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao Z, Deocharan B, Scherer PE, Ozelius LJ, Putterman C. Differential binding of cross-reactive anti-DNA antibodies to mesangial cells: the role of alpha-actinin. J Immunol. 2006;176(12):7704–14. Epub 2006/06/06. doi: 176/12/7704 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moritz CP, Tholance Y, Stoevesandt O, Ferraud K, Camdessanché JP, Antoine JC. CIDP Antibodies Target Junction Proteins and Identify Patient Subgroups: An Autoantigenomic Approach. Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation. 2021;8(2). Epub 2021/01/08. doi: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rucksaken R, Haonon O, Pinlaor P, Pairojkul C, Roytrakul S, Yongvanit P, et al. Plasma IgG autoantibody against actin-related protein 3 in liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Parasite immunology. 2015;37(7):340–8. Epub 2015/03/27. doi: 10.1111/pim.12188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang T, Liu M, Zheng SJ, Bian DD, Zhang JY, Yao J, et al. Tumor-associated autoantibodies are useful biomarkers in immunodiagnosis of α-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(19):3496–504. Epub 2017/06/10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i19.3496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Privitera D, Corti V, Alessio M, Volontè MA, Lampasona V, Comi G, et al. Proteomic identification of aldolase A as an autoantibody target in patients with atypical movement disorders. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013;34(3):313–20. Epub 2012/03/07. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-0996-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morohoshi K, Ohbayashi M, Patel N, Chong V, Bird AC, Ono SJ. Identification of anti-retinal antibodies in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Experimental and molecular pathology. 2012;93(2):193–9. Epub 2012/04/03. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pott MC, Frede N, Wanders J, Hammarström L, Glocker EO, Glocker C, et al. Autoantibodies against BAFF, APRIL or IL21 - an alternative pathogenesis for antibody-deficiencies? BMC immunology. 2017;18(1):34. Epub 2017/06/28. doi: 10.1186/s12865-017-0217-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hrycek A, Cieślik P. Annexin A5 and anti-annexin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(5):1335–42. Epub 2011/02/08. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1793-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seko Y, Matsumoto A, Fukuda T, Imai Y, Fujimura T, Taka H, et al. A case of neonatal lupus erythematosus presenting delayed dilated cardiomyopathy with circulating autoantibody to annexin A6. Int Heart J. 2007;48(3):407–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katsumata Y, Kawaguchi Y, Baba S, Hattori S, Tahara K, Ito K, et al. Identification of three new autoantibodies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus using two proteomic approaches. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP. 2011;10(6):M110.005330. Epub 2011/04/09. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.005330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kamburova EG, Gruijters ML, Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, et al. Antibodies against ARHGDIB are associated with long-term kidney graft loss. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2019;19(12):3335–44. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heo CK, Hwang HM, Lim WH, Lee HJ, Yoo JS, Lim KJ, et al. Cyclic Peptide Mimotopes for the Detection of Serum Anti-ATIC Autoantibody Biomarker in Hepato-Cellular Carcinoma. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(24). Epub 2020/12/24. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Creaney J, Dick IM, Yeoman D, Wong S, Robinson BW. Auto-antibodies to β-F1-ATPase and vimentin in malignant mesothelioma. PloS one. 2011;6(10):e26515. Epub 2011/10/25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beutgen VM, Schmelter C, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Autoantigens in the trabecular meshwork and glaucoma-specific alterations in the natural autoantibody repertoire. Clinical & translational immunology. 2020;9(3):e01101. Epub 2020/03/07. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gruber CN, Patel RS, Trachtman R, Lepow L, Amanat F, Krammer F, et al. Mapping Systemic Inflammation and Antibody Responses in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Cell. 2020;183(4):982–95. e14. Epub 2020/09/30. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boehm J, Orth T, Van Nguyen P, Soling HD. Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with increased auto-antibody titers against calreticulin and grp94, but calreticulin is not the Ro/SS-A antigen. Eur J Clin Invest. 1994;24(4):248–57. Epub 1994/04/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matsuo K, Xiang Y, Nakamura H, Masuko K, Yudoh K, Noyori K, et al. Identification of novel citrullinated autoantigens of synovium in rheumatoid arthritis using a proteomic approach. Arthritis research & therapy. 2006;8(6):R175. Epub 2006/11/28. doi: 10.1186/ar2085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li WH, Zhao J, Li HY, Liu H, Li AL, Wang HX, et al. Proteomics-based identification of autoantibodies in the sera of healthy Chinese individuals from Beijing. Proteomics. 2006;6(17):4781–9. Epub 2006/08/01. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yokota SI, Hirata D, Minota S, Higashiyama T, Kurimoto M, Yanagi H, et al. Autoantibodies against chaperonin CCT in human sera with rheumatic autoimmune diseases: comparison with antibodies against other Hsp60 family proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2000;5(4):337–46. Epub 2000/10/26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hirai K, Maeda H, Omori K, Yamamoto T, Kokeguchi S, Takashiba S. Serum antibody response to group II chaperonin from Methanobrevibacter oralis and human chaperonin CCT. Pathog Dis. 2013;68(1):12–9. Epub 2013/04/27. doi: 10.1111/2049-632x.12041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goto M, Kuribayashi K, Takahashi Y, Kondoh T, Tanaka M, Kobayashi D, et al. Identification of autoantibodies expressed in acquired aplastic anaemia. British journal of haematology. 2013;160(3):359–62. Epub 2012/11/03. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rho JH, Zhang W, Murali M, Roehrl MH, Wang JY. Human proteins with affinity for dermatan sulfate have the propensity to become autoantigens. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(5):2177–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rouwette M, Noben JP, Van Horssen J, Van Wijmeersch B, Hupperts R, Jongen PJ, et al. Identification of coronin-1a as a novel antibody target for clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis. Journal of neurochemistry. 2013;126(4):483–92. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bénistant C, Bourgaux JF, Chapuis H, Mottet N, Roche S, Bali JP. The COOH-terminal Src kinase Csk is a tumor antigen in human carcinoma. Cancer research. 2001;61(4):1415–20. Epub 2001/03/14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schneider F, Aggarwal R, Bi D, Gibson K, Oddis C, Yousem SA. The pulmonary histopathology of anti-KS transfer RNA synthetase syndrome. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(1):122–5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0667-OA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Netter HJ, Will H, Szostecki C, Guldner HH. Repetitive P68-autoantigen specific epitopes recognized by human anti-(U1) small nuclear ribonucleoprotein autoantibodies. Journal of autoimmunity. 1991;4(4):651–63. Epub 1991/08/01. doi: 10.1016/0896-8411(91)90183-d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yamasaki Y, Narain S, Yoshida H, Hernandez L, Barker T, Hahn PC, et al. Autoantibodies to RNA helicase A: a new serologic marker of early lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(2):596–604. doi: 10.1002/art.22329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoneyama K, Shibata R, Igarashi A, Kojima S, Kodani Y, Nagata K, et al. Proteomic identification of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase as a target of autoantibodies in patients with endometrial cancer. Anticancer research. 2014;34(9):5021–7. Epub 2014/09/10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim EG, Kwak SH, Hwang D, Yi EC, Park KS, Koo BK, et al. The Level of Autoantibodies Targeting Eukaryote Translation Elongation Factor 1 α1 and Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme 2L3 in Nondiabetic Young Adults. Diabetes Metab J. 2016;40(2):154–60. Epub 2015/12/01. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2016.40.2.154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mooney CJ, Dunphy EJ, Stone B, McNeel DG. Identification of autoantibodies elicited in a patient with prostate cancer presenting as dermatomyositis. Int J Urol. 2006;13(3):211–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohkouchi K, Mizutani H, Tanaka M, Takahashi M, Nakashima K, Shimizu M. Anti-elongation factor-1alpha autoantibody in adult atopic dermatitis patients. Int Immunol. 1999;11(10):1635–40. Epub 1999/10/03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fernández-Madrid F, Tang N, Alansari H, Granda JL, Tait L, Amirikia KC, et al. Autoantibodies to Annexin XI-A and Other Autoantigens in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Cancer research. 2004;64(15):5089–96. Epub 2004/08/04. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bach M, Winkelmann G, Luhrmann R. 20S small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U5 shows a surprisingly complex protein composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86(16):6038–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Heo CK, Hwang HM, Lee HJ, Kwak SS, Yoo JS, Yu DY, et al. Serum anti-EIF3A autoantibody as a potential diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47365-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen X, Fu S, Chen F, Chen H, Chen Z. Identification of tumor-associated antigens in human hepatocellular carcinoma by autoantibodies. Oncol Rep. 2008;20(4):979–85. Epub 2008/09/25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Betteridge Z, Chinoy H, Vencovsky J, Winer J, Putchakayala K, Ho P, et al. Identification of a novel autoantigen eukaryotic initiation factor 3 associated with polymyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2020;59(5):1026–30. Epub 2019/11/16. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Suwarnalata G, Tan AH, Isa H, Gudimella R, Anwar A, Loke MF, et al. Augmentation of Autoantibodies by Helicobacter pylori in Parkinson’s Disease Patients May Be Linked to Greater Severity. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0153725. Epub 2016/04/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pagaza-Straffon C, Marchat LA, Herrera L, Díaz-Chávez J, Avante MG, Rodríguez YP, et al. Evaluation of a panel of tumor-associated antigens in breast cancer. Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers. 2020;27(2):207–11. Epub 2019/12/17. doi: 10.3233/cbm-190708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nabors LB, Furneaux HM, King PH. HuR, a novel target of anti-Hu antibodies, is expressed in non-neural tissues. Journal of neuroimmunology. 1998;92(1–2):152–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.O’Dwyer DT, Clifton V, Hall A, Smith R, Robinson PJ, Crock PA. Pituitary autoantibodies in lymphocytic hypophysitis target both gamma- and alpha-Enolase - a link with pregnancy? Archives of physiology and biochemistry. 2002;110(1–2):94–8. Epub 2002/04/06. doi: 10.1076/apab.110.1.94.897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Targoff IN, Trieu EP, Miller FW. Reaction of anti-OJ autoantibodies with components of the multi-enzyme complex of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in addition to isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;91(6):2556–64. doi: 10.1172/JCI116493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Capello M, Cappello P, Linty FC, Chiarle R, Sperduti I, Novarino A, et al. Autoantibodies to Ezrin are an early sign of pancreatic cancer in humans and in genetically engineered mouse models. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2013;6:67. Epub 2013/09/10. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Betteridge Z, Gunawardena H, North J, Slinn J, McHugh N. Anti-synthetase syndrome: a new autoantibody to phenylalanyl transfer RNA synthetase (anti-Zo) associated with polymyositis and interstitial pneumonia. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2007;46(6):1005–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Heo CK, Woo MK, Yu DY, Lee JY, Yoo JS, Yoo HS, et al. Identification of autoantibody against fatty acid synthase in hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model and its application to diagnosis of HCC. Int J Oncol. 2010;36(6):1453–9. Epub 2010/04/30. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Desmetz C, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Rochaix P, Lamy PJ, Kramar A, Rouanet P, et al. Identification of a new panel of serum autoantibodies associated with the presence of in situ carcinoma of the breast in younger women. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2009;15(14):4733–41. Epub 2009/07/09. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-3307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Terrier B, Tamby MC, Camoin L, Guilpain P, Broussard C, Bussone G, et al. Identification of target antigens of antifibroblast antibodies in pulmonary arterial hypertension. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2008;177(10):1128–34. Epub 2008/02/16. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200707-1015OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kit Y, Starykovych M, Vajrychova M, Lenco J, Zastavna D, Stoika R. Detection of novel auto-antigens in patients with recurrent miscarriage: description of an approach and preliminary findings. Croat Med J. 2014;55(3):259–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Takasaki Y, Kaneda K, Matsushita M, Yamada H, Nawata M, Matsudaira R, et al. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase is a novel autoantigen leading autoimmune responses to proliferating cell nuclear antigen multiprotein complexes in lupus patients. Int Immunol. 2004;16(9):1295–304. Epub 2004/07/21. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh131 [doi] dxh131 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schneider F, Yousem SA, Bi D, Gibson KF, Oddis CV, Aggarwal R. Pulmonary pathologic manifestations of anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-EJ)-related inflammatory myopathy. Journal of clinical pathology. 2014;67(8):678–83. Epub 2014/06/04. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kiyota A, Iwama S, Sugimura Y, Takeuchi S, Takagi H, Iwata N, et al. Identification of the novel autoantigen candidate Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha in isolated adrenocorticotropin deficiency. Endocrine journal. 2015;62(2):153–60. Epub 2014/10/28. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Massa O, Alessio M, Russo L, Nardo G, Bonetto V, Bertuzzi F, et al. Serological Proteome Analysis (SERPA) as a tool for the identification of new candidate autoantigens in type 1 diabetes. Journal of proteomics. 2013;82:263–73. Epub 2013/03/19. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Carlsson L, Ronquist G, Nilsson BO, Larsson A. Dominant prostasome immunogens for sperm-agglutinating autoantibodies of infertile men. Journal of andrology. 2004;25(5):699–705. Epub 2004/08/05. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02844.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Belousov PV, Afanasyeva MA, Gubernatorova EO, Bogolyubova AV, Uvarova AN, Putlyaeva LV, et al. Multi-dimensional immunoproteomics coupled with in vitro recapitulation of oncogenic NRAS(Q61R) identifies diagnostically relevant autoantibody biomarkers in thyroid neoplasia. Cancer letters. 2019;467:96–106. Epub 2019/07/22. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rubin RL, Bell SA, Burlingame RW. Autoantibodies associated with lupus induced by diverse drugs target a similar epitope in the (H2A-H2B)-DNA complex. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1992;90(1):165–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI115832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Burlingame RW, Boey ML, Starkebaum G, Rubin RL. The central role of chromatin in autoimmune responses to histones and DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;94(1):184–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI117305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rosenberg AM, Cordeiro DM. Relationship between sex and antibodies to high mobility group proteins 1 and 2 in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(10):2489–93. Epub 2000/10/19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wesierska-Gadek J, Penner E, Lindner H, Hitchman E, Sauermann G. Autoantibodies against different histone H1 subtypes in systemic lupus erythematosus sera. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1990;33(8):1273–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Vordenbaumen S, Bohmer P, Brinks R, Fischer-Betz R, Richter J, Bleck E, et al. High diagnostic accuracy of histone H4-IgG autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2018;57(3):533–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Baranova SV, Dmitrienok PS, Ivanisenko NV, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Antibodies to H2a and H2b histones from the sera of HIV-infected patients catalyze site-specific degradation of these histones. Molecular bioSystems. 2017;13(6):1090–101. Epub 2017/04/21. doi: 10.1039/c7mb00042a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bruschi M, Galetti M, Sinico RA, Moroni G, Bonanni A, Radice A, et al. Glomerular Autoimmune Multicomponents of Human Lupus Nephritis In Vivo (2): Planted Antigens. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2015;26(8):1905–24. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014050493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.van Bavel CC, Dieker J, Muller S, Briand JP, Monestier M, Berden JH, et al. Apoptosis-associated acetylation on histone H2B is an epitope for lupus autoantibodies. Molecular immunology. 2009;47(2–3):511–6. Epub 2009/09/15. doi: S0161–5890(09)00686–5 [pii] 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Baranova SV, Dmitrenok PS, Zubkova AD, Ivanisenko NV, Odintsova ES, Buneva VN, et al. Antibodies against H3 and H4 histones from the sera of HIV-infected patients catalyze site-specific degradation of these histones. Journal of molecular recognition : JMR. 2018;31(7):e2703. Epub 2018/02/20. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Astaldi Ricotti GC, Bestagno M, Cerino A, Negri C, Caporali R, Cobianchi F, et al. Antibodies to hnRNP core protein A1 in connective tissue diseases. J Cell Biochem. 1989;40(1):43–7. Epub 1989/05/01. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240400105 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Konig MF, Giles JT, Nigrovic PA, Andrade F. Antibodies to native and citrullinated RA33 (hnRNP A2/B1) challenge citrullination as the inciting principle underlying loss of tolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2016;75(11):2022–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Siapka S, Patrinou-Georgoula M, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Guialis A. Multiple specificities of autoantibodies against hnRNP A/B proteins in systemic rheumatic diseases and hnRNP L as an associated novel autoantigen. Autoimmunity. 2007;40(3):223–33. doi: 10.1080/08916930701352357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Stanek D, Vencovsky J, Kafkova J, Raska I. Heterogenous nuclear RNP C1 and C2 core proteins are targets for an autoantibody found in the serum of a patient with systemic sclerosis and psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1997;40(12):2172–7. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Skriner K, Hueber W, Süleymanoglu E, Höfler E, Krenn V, Smolen J, et al. AUF1, the regulator of tumor necrosis factor alpha messenger RNA decay, is targeted by autoantibodies of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2008;58(2):511–20. Epub 2008/02/02. doi: 10.1002/art.23306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang Y, Zhao H, Liu B, Li L, Zhang L, Bao M, et al. Low Level Antibodies Against Alpha-Tropomyosin Are Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020;11:195. Epub 2020/03/17. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Op De Beéck K, Maes L, Van den Bergh K, Derua R, Waelkens E, Van Steen K, et al. Heterogeneous nuclear RNPs as targets of autoantibodies in systemic rheumatic diseases. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2012;64(1):213–21. Epub 2011/09/10. doi: 10.1002/art.33327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rauch J, Ahlemann M, Schaffrik M, Mack B, Ertongur S, Andratschke M, et al. Allogenic antibody-mediated identification of head and neck cancer antigens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;323(1):156–62. Epub 2004/09/08. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.071 [doi] S0006–291X(04)01792–9 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang JY, Chan EK, Peng XX, Tan EM. A novel cytoplasmic protein with RNA-binding motifs is an autoantigen in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Med. 1999;189(7):1101–10. Epub 1999/04/06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hassfeld W, Chan EK, Mathison DA, Portman D, Dreyfuss G, Steiner G, et al. Molecular definition of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein R (hnRNP R) using autoimmune antibody: immunological relationship with hnRNP P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26(2):439–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Britton S, Froment C, Frit P, Monsarrat B, Salles B, Calsou P. Cell nonhomologous end joining capacity controls SAF-A phosphorylation by DNA-PK in response to DNA double-strand breaks inducers. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(22):3717–22. Epub 2009/10/22. doi: 10025 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Harlow L, Rosas IO, Gochuico BR, Mikuls TR, Dellaripa PF, Oddis CV, et al. Identification of citrullinated hsp90 isoforms as novel autoantigens in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2013;65(4):869–79. doi: 10.1002/art.37881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Qin HY, Mahon JL, Atkinson MA, Chaturvedi P, Lee-Chan E, Singh B. Type 1 diabetes alters anti-hsp90 autoantibody isotype. Journal of autoimmunity. 2003;20(3):237–45. Epub 2003/05/20. doi: 10.1016/s0896-8411(03)00035-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pashov A, Kenderov A, Kyurkchiev S, Kehayov I, Hristova S, Lacroix-Desmazes S, et al. Autoantibodies to heat shock protein 90 in the human natural antibody repertoire. Int Immunol. 2002;14(5):453–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tishler M, Shoenfeld Y. Anti-heat-shock protein antibodies in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996;26(2):558–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Blass S, Union A, Raymackers J, Schumann F, Ungethum U, Muller-Steinbach S, et al. The stress protein BiP is overexpressed and is a major B and T cell target in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(4):761–71. Epub 2001/04/24. doi: [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Munakata S, Chen M, Aosai F, Kawaguchi N, Nemoto Y, Norose K, et al. The clinical significance of anti-heat shock cognate protein 71 antibody in myasthenia gravis. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(2):158–65. Epub 2007/11/06. doi: S0967–5868(06)00433–4 [pii] 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Alard JE, Dueymes M, Mageed RA, Saraux A, Youinou P, Jamin C. Mitochondrial heat shock protein (HSP) 70 synergizes with HSP60 in transducing endothelial cell apoptosis induced by anti-HSP60 autoantibody. Faseb J. 2009;23(8):2772–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Horvath L, Cervenak L, Oroszlan M, Prohaszka Z, Uray K, Hudecz F, et al. Antibodies against different epitopes of heat-shock protein 60 in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Immunol Lett. 2002;80(3):155–62. Epub 2002/01/23. doi: S0165247801003364 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Minohara M. [Heat shock protein 105 in multiple sclerosis]. Nippon Rinsho. 2003;61(8):1317–22. Epub 2003/09/10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bremer HD, Landegren N, Sjoberg R, Hallgren A, Renneker S, Lattwein E, et al. ILF2 and ILF3 are autoantigens in canine systemic autoimmune disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23034-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ola TO, Biro PA, Hawa MI, Ludvigsson J, Locatelli M, Puglisi MA, et al. Importin beta: a novel autoantigen in human autoimmunity identified by screening random peptide libraries on phage. Journal of autoimmunity. 2006;26(3):197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2006.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Luo LY, Herrera I, Soosaipillai A, Diamandis EP. Identification of heat shock protein 90 and other proteins as tumour antigens by serological screening of an ovarian carcinoma expression library. British journal of cancer. 2002;87(3):339–43. Epub 2002/08/15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Presslauer S, Hinterhuber G, Cauza K, Horvat R, Rappersberger K, Wolff K, et al. RasGAP-like protein IQGAP1 is expressed by human keratinocytes and recognized by autoantibodies in association with bullous skin disease. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2003;120(3):365–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12070.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ueda K, Nakanishi T, Shimizu A, Takubo T, Matsuura N. Identification of L-plastin autoantibody in plasma of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma using a proteomics-based analysis. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45(Pt 1):65–9. Epub 2008/02/16. doi: 10.1258/acb.2007.006230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Forti S, Scanlan MJ, Invernizzi A, Castiglioni F, Pupa S, Agresti R, et al. Identification of breast cancer-restricted antigens by antibody screening of SKBR3 cDNA library using a preselected patient’s serum. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2002;73(3):245–56. Epub 2002/08/06. doi: 10.1023/a:1015854415746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gemma R, Suzuki Y, Tanaka I, Taminato T, Yoshimi T, Kanno T. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-linked immunoglobulin in a patient with Graves’ disease treated with methimazole. Intern Med. 1992;31(3):377–9. Epub 1992/03/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tanaka M, Kishimura M, Ozaki S, Osakada F, Hashimoto H, Okubo M, et al. Cloning of novel soluble gp130 and detection of its neutralizing autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2000;106(1):137–44. doi: 10.1172/JCI7479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Frampton G, Moriya S, Pearson JD, Isenberg DA, Ward FJ, Smith TA, et al. Identification of candidate endothelial cell autoantigens in systemic lupus erythematosus using a molecular cloning strategy: a role for ribosomal P protein P0 as an endothelial cell autoantigen. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2000;39(10):1114–20. Epub 2000/10/18. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.10.1114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Suzuki K, Nagao T, Itabashi M, Hamano Y, Sugamata R, Yamazaki Y, et al. A novel autoantibody against moesin in the serum of patients with MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(6):1168–77. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mossabeb R, Seiberler S, Mittermann I, Reininger R, Spitzauer S, Natter S, et al. Characterization of a novel isoform of alpha-nascent polypeptide-associated complex as IgE-defined autoantigen. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2002;119(4):820–9. Epub 2002/10/31. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00518.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Beaulande M, Kron M, Hirakata M, Härtlein M. Human anti-asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase autoantibodies (anti-KS) increase the affinity of the enzyme for its tRNA substrate. FEBS letters. 2001;494(3):170–4. Epub 2001/04/20. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02340-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Batova IN, Richardson RT, Widgren EE, O’Rand MG. Analysis of the autoimmune epitopes on human testicular NASP using recombinant and synthetic peptides. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2000;121(2):201–9. Epub 2000/08/10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01303.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Qin Z, Lavingia B, Zou Y, Stastny P. Antibodies against nucleolin in recipients of organ transplants. Transplantation. 2011;92(7):829–35. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822d0977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Le Naour F, Brichory F, Misek DE, Brechot C, Hanash SM, Beretta L. A distinct repertoire of autoantibodies in hepatocellular carcinoma identified by proteomic analysis. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP. 2002;1(3):197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ulanet DB, Torbenson M, Dang CV, Casciola-Rosen L, Rosen A. Unique conformation of cancer autoantigen B23 in hepatoma: a mechanism for specificity in the autoimmune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(21):12361–6. Epub 2003/10/02. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035245100 [doi] 2035245100 [pii]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nagayama S, Yokoi T, Tanaka H, Kawaguchi Y, Shirasaka T, Kamataki T. Occurrence of autoantibody to protein disulfide isomerase in patients with hepatic disorder. J Toxicol Sci. 1994;19(3):163–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Becker A, Ludwig N, Keller A, Tackenberg B, Eienbroker C, Oertel WH, et al. Myasthenia gravis: analysis of serum autoantibody reactivities to 1827 potential human autoantigens by protein macroarrays. PloS one. 2013;8(3):e58095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Caorsi C, Niccolai E, Capello M, Vallone R, Chattaragada MS, Alushi B, et al. Protein disulfide isomerase A3-specific Th1 effector cells infiltrate colon cancer tissue of patients with circulating anti-protein disulfide isomerase A3 autoantibodies. Transl Res. 2016;171:17–28. e1–2. Epub 2016/01/17. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gut J, Christen U, Frey N, Koch V, Stoffler D. Molecular mimicry in halothane hepatitis: biochemical and structural characterization of lipoylated autoantigens. Toxicology. 1995;97(1–3):199–224. Epub 1995/03/31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Chang DC, Piaggi P, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Bogardus C, Krakoff J. Autoantibodies against PFDN2 are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes: A case-control study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017;33(8). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kimura A, Sakurai T, Koumura A, Yamada M, Hayashi Y, Tanaka Y, et al. High prevalence of autoantibodies against phosphoglycerate mutase 1 in patients with autoimmune central nervous system diseases. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2010;219(1–2):105–8. Epub 2009/12/09. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Xiang D, Xia Q, Chen D, Feng X, Zhao Y, Liu Y, et al. Detection of D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune hepatitis: Clinical significance evaluation. Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology. 2011;41(9):867–76. Epub 2011/06/29. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00839.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Loshaj-Shala A, Colzani M, Brezovska K, Poceva Panovska A, Suturkova L, Beretta G. Immunoproteomic identification of antigenic candidate Campylobacter jejuni and human peripheral nerve proteins involved in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2018;317:77–83. Epub 2018/01/18. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kratz A, Harding MW, Craft J, Mackworth-Young CG, Handschumacher RE. Autoantibodies against cyclophilin in systemic lupus erythematosus and Lyme disease. Clinical and experimental immunology. 1992;90(3):422–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Karasawa R, Ozaki S, Nishioka K, Kato T. Autoantibodies to peroxiredoxin I and IV in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. Microbiology and immunology. 2005;49(1):57–65. Epub 2005/01/25. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2005.tb03640.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lin LH, Xu YW, Huang LS, Hong CQ, Zhai TT, Liao LD, et al. Serum proteomic-based analysis identifying autoantibodies against PRDX2 and PRDX3 as potential diagnostic biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clinical proteomics. 2017;14:6. Epub 2017/02/12. doi: 10.1186/s12014-017-9141-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sun KH, Tang SJ, Wang YS, Lin WJ, You RI. Autoantibodies to dsDNA cross-react with the arginine-glycine-rich domain of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2 (hnRNP A2) and promote methylation of hnRNP A2. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(1):154–61. Epub 2003/01/02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mayo I, Arribas J, Villoslada P, Alvarez DoForno R, Rodriguez-Vilarino S, Montalban X, et al. The proteasome is a major autoantigen in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 12):2658–67. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Feist E, Kuckelkorn U, Dörner T, Dönitz H, Scheffler S, Hiepe F, et al. Autoantibodies in primary Sjögren’s syndrome are directed against proteasomal subunits of the alpha and beta type. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1999;42(4):697–702. Epub 1999/04/22. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Feist E, Dorner T, Kuckelkorn U, Schmidtke G, Micheel B, Hiepe F, et al. Proteasome alpha-type subunit C9 is a primary target of autoantibodies in sera of patients with myositis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1996;184(4):1313–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Bohring C, Krause W. Characterization of spermatozoa surface antigens by antisperm antibodies and its influence on acrosomal exocytosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2003;50(5):411–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Sugimoto K, Hiwasa T, Shibuya K, Hirano S, Beppu M, Isose S, et al. Novel autoantibodies against the proteasome subunit PSMA7 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2018;325:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Scheffler S, Kuckelkorn U, Egerer K, Dörner T, Reiter K, Soza A, et al. Autoimmune reactivity against the 20S-proteasome includes immunosubunits LMP2 (beta1i), MECL1 (beta2i) and LMP7 (beta5i). Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2008;47(5):622–6. Epub 2008/04/01. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Luna Coronell JA, Sergelen K, Hofer P, Gyurján I, Brezina S, Hettegger P, et al. The Immunome of Colon Cancer: Functional In Silico Analysis of Antigenic Proteins Deduced from IgG Microarray Profiling. Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 2018;16(1):73–84. Epub 2018/03/06. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Roessler M, Rollinger W, Mantovani-Endl L, Hagmann ML, Palme S, Berndt P, et al. Identification of PSME3 as a novel serum tumor marker for colorectal cancer by combining two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a strictly mass spectrometry-based approach for data analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(11):2092–101. Epub 2006/08/09. doi: M600118-MCP200 [pii] 10.1074/mcp.M600118-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Montecucco C, Caporali R, Cobianchi F, Biamonti G. Identification of autoantibodies to the I protein of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1996;39(10):1669–76. Epub 1996/10/01. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Thébault S, Gilbert D, Hubert M, Drouot L, Machour N, Lange C, et al. Orderly pattern of development of the autoantibody response in (New Zealand White x BXSB)F1 lupus mice: characterization of target antigens and antigen spreading by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2002;169(7):4046–53. Epub 2002/09/24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.4046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wagatsuma M, Kimura M, Suzuki R, Takeuchi F, Matsuta K, Watanabe H. Ezrin, radixin and moesin are possible auto-immune antigens in rheumatoid arthritis. Molecular immunology. 1996;33(15):1171–6. Epub 1996/10/01. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(96)00083-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gerli R, Caponi L. Anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies. Autoimmunity. 2005;38(1):85–92. Epub 2005/04/05. doi: N1M7262UW316830N [pii] 10.1080/08916930400022699 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Tycowski KT, Shu MD, Steitz JA. A small nucleolar RNA is processed from an intron of the human gene encoding ribosomal protein S3. Genes & development. 1993;7(7a):1176–90. Epub 1993/07/01. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7a.1176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kaji K, Fertig N, Medsger TA Jr., Satoh T, Hoshino K, Hamaguchi Y, et al. Autoantibodies to RuvBL1 and RuvBL2: a novel systemic sclerosis-related antibody associated with diffuse cutaneous and skeletal muscle involvement. Arthritis care & research. 2014;66(4):575–84. Epub 2013/09/12. doi: 10.1002/acr.22163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Pauling JD, Salazar G, Lu H, Betteridge ZE, Assassi S, Mayes MD, et al. Presence of anti-eukaryotic initiation factor-2B, anti-RuvBL1/2 and anti-synthetase antibodies in patients with anti-nuclear antibody negative systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2018;57(4):712–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Margutti P, Sorice M, Conti F, Delunardo F, Racaniello M, Alessandri C, et al. Screening of an endothelial cDNA library identifies the C-terminal region of Nedd5 as a novel autoantigen in systemic lupus erythematosus with psychiatric manifestations. Arthritis research & therapy. 2005;7(4):R896–903. Epub 2005/07/01. doi: 10.1186/ar1759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lefranc D, Launay D, Dubucquoi S, de Seze J, Dussart P, Vermersch M, et al. Characterization of discriminant human brain antigenic targets in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus using an immunoproteomic approach. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2007;56(10):3420–32. doi: 10.1002/art.22863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Chai Z, Sarcevic B, Mawson A, Toh BH. SET-related cell division autoantigen-1 (CDA1) arrests cell growth. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(36):33665–74. Epub 2001/06/08. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007681200 M007681200 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hwang HM, Heo CK, Lee HJ, Kwak SS, Lim WH, Yoo JS, et al. Identification of anti-SF3B1 autoantibody as a diagnostic marker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of translational medicine. 2018;16(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1546-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Hosono Y, Nakashima R, Serada S, Murakami K, Imura Y, Yoshifuji H, et al. Splicing factor proline/glutamine-rich is a novel autoantigen of dermatomyositis and associated with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody. Journal of autoimmunity. 2017;77:116–22. Epub 2016/12/07. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Hof D, Cheung K, de Rooij DJ, van den Hoogen FH, Pruijn GJ, van Venrooij WJ, et al. Autoantibodies specific for apoptotic U1–70K are superior serological markers for mixed connective tissue disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(2):R302–9. Epub 2005/03/04. doi: ar1490 [pii] 10.1186/ar1490 [doi]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yamamoto AM, Amoura Z, Johannet C, Jeronimo AL, Campos H, Koutouzov S, et al. Quantitative radioligand assays using de novo-synthesized recombinant autoantigens in connective tissue diseases: new tools to approach the pathogenic significance of anti-RNP antibodies in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2000;43(3):689–98. Epub 2000/03/23. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Mimori T, Hinterberger M, Pettersson I, Steitz JA. Autoantibodies to the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in a patient with scleroderma-polymyositis overlap syndrome. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1984;259(1):560–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Brahms H, Raymackers J, Union A, de Keyser F, Meheus L, Luhrmann R. The C-terminal RG dipeptide repeats of the spliceosomal Sm proteins D1 and D3 contain symmetrical dimethylarginines, which form a major B-cell epitope for anti-Sm autoantibodies. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275(22):17122–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000300200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.McClain MT, Ramsland PA, Kaufman KM, James JA. Anti-sm autoantibodies in systemic lupus target highly basic surface structures of complexed spliceosomal autoantigens. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2002;168(4):2054–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Satoh M, Chan JY, Ross SJ, Ceribelli A, Cavazzana I, Franceschini F, et al. Autoantibodies to survival of motor neuron complex in patients with polymyositis: immunoprecipitation of D, E, F, and G proteins without other components of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2011;63(7):1972–8. Epub 2011/03/23. doi: 10.1002/art.30349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Garbarz M, Dhermy D, Bournier O, Bezeaud A, Boivin P. Anti-spectrin in sera containing smooth muscle autoantibodies from patients with chronic active hepatitis. Clinical and experimental immunology. 1981;43(1):87–93. Epub 1981/01/01. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Imai H, Chan EK, Kiyosawa K, Fu XD, Tan EM. Novel nuclear autoantigen with splicing factor motifs identified with antibody from hepatocellular carcinoma. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;92(5):2419–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI116848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yang Q, Qin J, Sun G, Qiu C, Jiang D, Ye H, et al. Discovery and Validation of Serum Autoantibodies Against Tumor-Associated Antigens as Biomarkers in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Based on the Focused Protein Arrays. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;12(1):e00284. Epub 2020/12/22. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Gordon P, Khamashta MA, Rosenthal E, Simpson JM, Sharland G, Brucato A, et al. Anti-52 kDa Ro, anti-60 kDa Ro, and anti-La antibody profiles in neonatal lupus. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(12):2480–7. Epub 2004/12/01. doi: 0315162X-31–2480 [pii]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Cortini A, Bembich S, Marson L, Cocco E, Edomi P. Identification of novel non-myelin biomarkers in multiple sclerosis using an improved phage-display approach. PloS one. 2019;14(12):e0226162. Epub 2019/12/06. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Niland B, Miklossy G, Banki K, Biddison WE, Casciola-Rosen L, Rosen A, et al. Cleavage of transaldolase by granzyme B causes the loss of enzymatic activity with retention of antigenicity for multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2010;184(7):4025–32. Epub 2010/03/03. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Muto M, Mori M, Hiwasa T, Takiguchi M, Iwadate Y, Uzawa A, et al. Novel serum autoantibodies against talin1 in multiple sclerosis: Possible pathogenetic roles of the antibodies. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2015;284:30–6. Epub 2015/05/31. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Mariampillai K, Granger B, Amelin D, Guiguet M, Hachulla E, Maurier F, et al. Development of a New Classification System for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies Based on Clinical Manifestations and Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies. JAMA neurology. 2018;75(12):1528–37. Epub 2018/09/13. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Geng X, Biancone L, Dai HH, Lin JJ, Yoshizaki N, Dasgupta A, et al. Tropomyosin isoforms in intestinal mucosa: production of autoantibodies to tropomyosin isoforms in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(5):912–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Mahesh SP, Li Z, Buggage R, Mor F, Cohen IR, Chew EY, et al. Alpha tropomyosin as a self-antigen in patients with Behcet’s disease. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2005;140(2):368–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02760.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Kimura A, Sakurai T, Yamada M, Koumura A, Hayashi Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2012;9(4):296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Lorenz K, Beck S, Keilani MM, Wasielica-Poslednik J, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Course of serum autoantibodies in patients after acute angle-closure glaucoma attack. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2017;45(3):280–7. Epub 2016/10/21. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Zhao X, Cheng Y, Gan Y, Jia R, Zhu L, Sun X. Anti-tubulin-alpha-1C autoantibody in systemic lupus erythematosus: a novel indicator of disease activity and vasculitis manifestations. Clinical rheumatology. 2018;37(5):1229–37. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4024-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Matthes T, Wolff A, Soubiran P, Gros F, Dighiero G. Antitubulin antibodies. II. Natural autoantibodies and induced antibodies recognize different epitopes on the tubulin molecule. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 1988;141(9):3135–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kimura A, Yoshikura N, Koumura A, Hayashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Kobayashi I, et al. Identification of target antigens of naturally occurring autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid. Journal of proteomics. 2015;128:450–7. Epub 2015/05/17. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Prasannan L, Misek DE, Hinderer R, Michon J, Geiger JD, Hanash SM. Identification of beta-tubulin isoforms as tumor antigens in neuroblastoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2000;6(10):3949–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Stubbs EB Jr., Fisher MA, Siegel GJ. Anti-tubulin antibodies in a sensorimotor neuropathy patient alter tubulin polymerization. Acta neuropathologica. 1998;95(3):302–5. Epub 1998/05/30. doi: 10.1007/s004010050802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Muro Y, Ogawa Y, Kato Y, Hagiwara M. Autoantibody to thioredoxin reductase in an ovarian cancer patient. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1998;242(2):267–71. Epub 1998/02/03. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Betteridge ZE, Gunawardena H, Chinoy H, North J, Ollier WE, Cooper RG, et al. Clinical and human leucocyte antigen class II haplotype associations of autoantibodies to small ubiquitin-like modifier enzyme, a dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen target, in UK Caucasian adult-onset myositis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2009;68(10):1621–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.097162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Miyachi K, Hosaka H, Nakamura N, Miyakawa H, Mimori T, Shibata M, et al. Anti-p97/VCP antibodies: an autoantibody marker for a subset of primary biliary cirrhosis patients with milder disease? Scand J Immunol. 2006;63(5):376–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.01747.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bang H, Egerer K, Gauliard A, Luthke K, Rudolph PE, Fredenhagen G, et al. Mutation and citrullination modifies vimentin to a novel autoantigen for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(8):2503–11. Epub 2007/08/01. doi: 10.1002/art.22817 [doi]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Paley EL, Alexandrova N, Smelansky L. Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase as a human autoantigen. Immunology letters. 1995;48(3):201–7. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(95)02469-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wen J, Yaneva M. Mapping of epitopes on the 86 kDa subunit of the Ku autoantigen. Mol Immunol. 1990;27(10):973–80. Epub 1990/10/01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Hoa S, Hudson M, Troyanov Y, Proudman S, Walker J, Stevens W, et al. Single-specificity anti-Ku antibodies in an international cohort of 2140 systemic sclerosis subjects: clinical associations. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(35):e4713. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Mahler M, Miller FW, Fritzler MJ. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and the anti-synthetase syndrome: a comprehensive review. Autoimmunity reviews. 2014;13(4–5):367–71. Epub 2014/01/16. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Kistner A, Bigler MB, Glatz K, Egli SB, Baldin FS, Marquardsen FA, et al. Characteristics of autoantibodies targeting 14-3-3 proteins and their association with clinical features in newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2017;56(5):829–34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.van Beers-Tas MH, Marotta A, Boers M, Maksymowych WP, van Schaardenburg D. A prospective cohort study of 14-3-3eta in ACPA and/or RF-positive patients with arthralgia. Arthritis research & therapy. 2016;18:76. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0975-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Qiu J, Choi G, Li L, Wang H, Pitteri SJ, Pereira-Faca SR, et al. Occurrence of autoantibodies to annexin I, 14-3-3 theta and LAMR1 in prediagnostic lung cancer sera. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26(31):5060–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.2388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Chakravarti R, Gupta K, Swain M, Willard B, Scholtz J, Svensson LG, et al. 14-3-3 in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: Identification of a Novel Autoantigen in Large Vessel Vasculitis. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, NJ). 2015;67(7):1913–21. doi: 10.1002/art.39130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Teitsma XM, Devenport J, Jacobs JWG, Petho-Schramm A, Borm MEA, Budde P, et al. Comprehensive exploratory autoantibody profiling in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate or tocilizumab. PloS one. 2020;15(12):e0241189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (316.3KB, xlsx)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES