Abstract
Background and Objectives:
Bacillus probiotics have been recently considered in biotechnological researches, and food additives. The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of Bacillus subtilis probiotics (PY79 and ATCC 6633) and their metabolites on Salmonella Typhimurium in Caco-2 cells.
Materials and Methods:
Cytotoxicity of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 crude supernatant (CS) was evaluated by 3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. S. Typhimurium invasion assay was performed in the presence of the probiotics. Cell viability, apoptosis, and necrosis were evaluated in presence of S. Typhimurium, B. subtilis strains, and CS (4%, 8%) using flow cytometry.
Results:
Results showed a significant reduction in the invasive ability of S. Typhimurium to Caco-2 cells by employing B. subtilis probiotics, and CS (p < 0.05). The less invasion was indicated in B. subtilis PY79 and Salmonella co-cultural group. Furthermore, the cell survival rates, and apoptosis/necrosis were respectively increased and decreased in co-culture groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Hence, it seems that B. subtilis strains could be suggested as beneficial candidates to overcome the invasion and cytotoxicity of Salmonella on the intestinal cells. However, additional in vivo models are suggested to validate our results.
Keywords: Probiotics, Salmonella Typhimurium, Caco-2 cells, Cytotoxicity tests, Immunologic, Flow cytometry
INTRODUCTION
Salmonella is noticed as the main agent of food borne disease. S. Typhimurium is known as a facultative intracellular pathogen with adherence and invasion ability to epithelia and macrophages due to its fimbriae and surface proteins. The pathogen damages to the host cells through colonizing, intracellular proliferating, leading to diarrhea (1, 2). As regards, invasion ability plays a key role to initiate the intestinal infection; identification of preventing methods may be helpful in controlling the disease. Probiotics and their metabolites are reported to be useful against enteropathogenic bacteria (3). Among common health promoting probiotics including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, Bacillus probiotics have been extensively employed as food additives for humans and animals. This is mainly due to surviving in harsh conditions such as high temperature, low pH, and chemicals (4, 5). Some valuable Bacillus probiotics features include improving mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) in human and animals; applying as insecticide; producing antimicrobial compounds such as amino acids, enzymes, lipopeptides, bacteriocins and bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) (6, 7).
Bacillus subtilis strains 189 and PY79, introduced as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) bacteria (8), are principally isolated from gastrointestinal tract (9). According to previous studies, bacteriocins produced by some strains of B. subtilis, have shown inibitory effects against Gram negative, and Gram positive pathogens (7, 10–13).
In vitro intestinal monolayers such as Caco-2 cells shows high similarity to epithelial cells of humans` ileum; the cell line has been widely selected to study interactions of probiotics and human-specific enteropathogens such as Salmonella (14–16).
In this study, we used an in vitro intestinal model to assess the influences of B. subtilis PY79, and B. subtilis ATCC 6633, and their antimicrobial substances against S. Typhimurium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
B. subtilis PY79, Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii ATCC 6633, and S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) were obtained from the Iranian Organizations for Science and Technology (Tehran, Iran). S. Typhimurium and the B. subtilis strains were respectively cultured in TSB (Merck, Germany) and TSB supplemented with 1% (w/v) yeast extract (Merck, Germany) (TSBYE) for 18 h at 37°C in an aerobic condition. 107 CFU/ml of each bacterium was finally re-suspended in cell culture medium for further assays.
Preparation of crude supernatant.
TSBYE medium was inoculated with B. subtilis ATCC 6633 and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The supernatant fluid was collected after centrifugation (7000×g, 20 min, 4°C) to supply crude supernatant (CS) and kept as freeze dried (Christ, Germany). Various CS concentrations were dissolved in RPMI medium and adjusted to pH 7 using pH meter (BASIC 20, Cerison, UK). Catalase enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was applied to remove probable hydrogen peroxide from the CS which was subsequently sterilized by 0.22 μM filter (17).
Bradford assay was performed to calculate protein concentration of CS using bradford stain (BioIdea, Iran), and bovine serum albumin (18). Optical density (O.D.) of samples was then recorded at 595 nm using microplate reader (BioTek, USA).
Cell culture.
Caco-2 ATCC HTB-37 epithelial cell line was purchased from Pasteur Institute of Iran (Tehran, Iran). The cells were routinely grown in RPMI 1640 (BioIdea, Iran), and supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, USA), 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (10000 IU/ml and 10000 μg/ml; BioIdea, Iran), and amphotericin B (50 mg/10 ml) (Sigma, USA). Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO atmosphere, and detached by 0.02% trypsin-EDTA. The cells were then seeded at approximately 3 × 104 cells/well into 96-well tissue culture plate and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO atmosphere. The experiments were performed on the confluent differentiated cells (15 days post-confluence) (19).
CS cytotoxicity on Caco-2 cells.
The MTT test was carried out as described by Ozkan et al. (2013). At first, monolayer of each well was washed using PBS and replaced with 100 μl non-supplemented RPMI. Plates were then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO for 1 h. The cells were then exposed to 100 μl CS (4%, 8%) and further incubated for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO. Metabolic activity analysis of the intestinal cells was performed according to 3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay kit (BioIdea, Iran). After the incubation period, the culture medium was replaced with 100 μl of RPMI 1640 and 10 μl MTT (12 mM) solution which was subsequently loaded into each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 h, the medium of each well was then replaced by 50 μl Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The absorbance of the wells was finally measured at 570 nm by microplate reader (BioTek, USA). The cell toxicity was calculated using the current equation (1-O.D. of the test sample/O.D. of the negative control) × 100 (20).
S. Typhimurium invasion to Caco-2 cells.
The monolayers (in 96 well tissue culture plate) were washed by PBS, and 100 μl (107 CFU/ml RPMI) B. subtilis ATCC 6633 or PY79 was added to the cells followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO. 100 μl RPMI medium containing 107 CFU/ml of S. Typhimurium was subsequently loaded into the Caco-2 cell monolayers faced with probiotics. In addition, 100 μl RPMI containing CS (4%) and 100 μl RPMI containing 107 CFU/ml S. Typhimurium were simultaneously added to the epithelial cells. Negative and positive controls were considered uninfected cells and S. Typhimurium infected cell, respectively. After washing the monolayers with PBS, 100 μl RPMI containing 100 μg/ml gentamicin (Alborz Darou, Iran) was loaded into each well. The plate was incubated for 1 h. The cells were subsequently washed followed by adding 0.1% Triton X-100 for cell lysis. The invaded S. Typhimurium bacteria to the cells were counted by surface plate counting method on brilliant green agar which was then incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The experiments were repeated 4 times (19).
Survival rate, early apoptosis, and necrosis of Caco-2 cells treated by S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis strains.
Flow cytometry was applied to examine the survival rate, early apoptosis and necrosis of intestinal cells exposed to various treatments of S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis strains. 4 × 105 cells initially seeded to T-12.5 flasks and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. After washing the monolayers with PBS, 107 CFU/ml B. subtilis strains, 1 ml RPMI containing CS (4%) were added to the cells and were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 2 h. S. Typhimurium suspension (107 CFU/ml RPMI) was then added to the flasks containing B. subtilis (107 CFU/ml) or CS (4%) or monolayers without any previous treatments. The flasks were incubated at the same condition. The cells were trypsinized, centrifuged (200×g, for 8 min), and washed 4 times with PBS. Following the last wash, the treated cells were re-suspended in 1× binding buffer and transferred into 1.5 ml microtubes. Uninfected flasks containing monolayers were considered as negative controls. Negative and unstained controls were prepared conferring to the PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, US). For each cell experiment run, data for 100000 events was determined by flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur, USA) (21, 22).
Statistical analysis.
One-way ANOVA test was applied using SPSS (version 16.0) software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) to analyse the data. Level of statistical significance reported at p < 0.05. Flow cytometry data was also analysed by FlowJo (version 7.6) software (Flexera, US).
RESULTS
CS cytotoxicity on Caco-2 cells.
CS cytotoxicity (8%, 4%) was evaluated on Caco-2 monolayer. The negative control (3.3%), and 4% CS (6.14%) groups revealed low cytotoxicity. While, the 8% CS concentration showed high cell toxicity (45.09%); it was accordingly not employed in further experiments.
S. Typhimurium invasion to Caco-2 cells.
S. Typhimurium invasion to Caco-2 cells was significantly reduced in the presence of Bacillus probiotics and the CS (4%) (p < 0.05). Invasion in co-culture groups including S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis PY79, S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis 6633, and also S. Typhimurium and CS (4%) were reported as 3.49, 4.02 and 4.02 log CFU/ml, respectively, compared to S. Typhimurium alone (5.25 log CFU/ml) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Invasion inhibition of various treatment groups in Caco-2 cells. Bars represented standard deviation (SD) values of triplicates. Different letters on bars indicate significant statistical differences (p < 0.05).
Survival, early apoptosis and necrosis of Caco-2 cells treated by S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis strains.
Cells survival, apoptosis, and necrosis were evaluated using flow cytometry in Caco-2 cells treated with S. Typhimurium, B. subtilis strains, and CS (4%, 8%) (Table 1). According to the results, B. subtilis probiotics and CS played effective roles to increase the Caco-2 cells viability. As shown in Table 1, mixtures of CS (4%) or B. subtilis PY79 or B. subtilis 6633 with S. Typhimurium, showed respectively 60.04%, 65.29%, and 58.61% cell viability. Furthermore, the highest record of cell viability belonged to both strains of B. subtilis including PY79 (96.5%), 6633 (92.71%), and 4% of CS (95.3%). Results were not statistically significant when they compared to the negative control group (97.79%) (p > 0.05). Moreover, the lowest level of cell viability was shown in the S. Typhimurium group (48.64%).
Table 1.
Percentages of viable, early, and late apoptosis (necrosis) of Caco-2 cells in different experimental groups using flow cytometry assay.
Experimental groups | Viable cells | Early apoptotic cells (%) | Necrotic cells (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Negative control | 97.8 ± 3.7 a | 1.63 ± 0.34 aA | 0.57 ± 0.37 aA |
CS* 4% | 95.32 ± 4.77 a | 2.83 ± 0.81 aA | 1.85 ± 0.52 aA |
B. subtilis PY79 | 95.6 ± 5.16 a | 2.20 ± 0.50 aA | 1.3 ± 0.33 aA |
B. subtilis ATCC 6633 | 92.72 ± 3.77 a | 4.96 ± 0.85 abA | 2.33 ± 0.56 aA |
CS 8% | 65.52 ± 5.35 b | 15.30 ± 3.45 cA | 20.47 ± 4.70 dA |
S. Typhimurium | 48.64 ± 3.74 c | 34.70 ± 2.47 eA | 16.29 ± 2.86 cdB |
S. Typhimurium + B. subtilis ATCC 6633 | 58.61 ± 5.22 d | 30.72 ± 4.9 deA | 9.67 ± 0.47 bB |
S. Typhimurium + B. subtilis PY79 | 65.28 ± 4.47 b | 28.87 ± 5.37 dA | 6.85 ± 4.36 abB |
S. Typhimurium + CS 4% | 60.04 ± 4.97 d | 26.84 ± 5.54 dA | 12.59 ± 0.48 bcB |
Crude supernatant. Values are mean ± SD of triplicates for flow cytometry assay. Different small and capital letters represent the statistical difference between each column and rows, respectively (p < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
Currently, interests are extensively focused on probiotics as safe alternative approach in preventing food borne pathogens rather than antibiotic therapy (23). Bacillus probiotics, and their metabolites have shown potential effects to combat Salmonella infections according in vitro and in vivo studies (11, 19, 24). In this study, the potency of two B. subtilis strains was investigated to control invasive enteropathogen such as S. Typhimurium in the intestinal epithelial cells. We initially evaluated the cell toxicity of S. Typhimurium, the Bacillus probiotics, and their metabolites (CS 4% and CS 8%) on Caco-2 cells using MTT assay. Results showed low cytotoxicity rate for B. subtilis PY79, and the CS 4% groups; while high cytotoxic percentage was observed in S. Typhimurium group. Previous reports showed numerous cytotoxicity rates of Bacillus species on different cell lines (25). The supernatants of B. subtilis PY79 cultured in BHI broth, and B. subtilis 6633 cultured in NB were respectively shown 0 and 4.5% cytotoxicity to Caco-2 and HT-29 cells (20, 26) which supported our results. In contrast, the CS with the concentration of 8% showed a high cytotoxicity which may be attributed to increased concentration of toxic protein compounds and remained culture medium in the antimicrobial substances obtained from the probiotic. Our results corroborate with some former reports (20, 26, 27). Moreover, the highest cytotoxicity rate was obtained in S. Typhimurium group in our study which was similar to those previously reported (19, 28).
The invasive ability of Salmonella to mammalian cells was repeatedly addressed by others. For instance, the bacteria invaded into Caco-2 monolayers were found 5.25 log CFU/ml in the present study. The result is compatible with the reports of other studies (1, 14, 29, 30). Lin et al. (2008) showed that of 8 log CFU/ml the S. choleraesuis 2a initially inoculated into Caco-2 cells, 5 log CFU/ml of the bacteria were internalized (31). The results were similar for S. Typhimurium (strains C52 and SL1433) when it was inoculated into the intestinal epithelial cells (29).
Identification of preventive methods against invasion of pathogens into the mammalian cells is considered the first step to inhibit the infection (2). Specific and nonspecific protective mechanisms suggested for probiotics against Salmonella include competition for adhesion, mucosa colonization, competitive exclusion, immunogenic effects, secreting antimicrobial substances, steric hindrance and other health impacts (7, 23, 32, 33). According to earlier researches, B. subtilis spp. have shown effective competitive exclusion role to control the enteropathogens (7, 34, 35). For instance, the intestinal colonization of bacteria was significantly decreased followed by administration of PY79 and RX71 strains of B. subtilis to chickens (24, 35). Furthermore, prior studies have been declared that some strains of B. subtilis isolated from various sources were capable to produce the antimicrobial substances (11, 13, 36). B. subtilis ATCC 6633 has revealed inhibitory ability against several Gram negative and positive pathogens followed by producing lantibiotic peptides (including subtilin, subtilosin A) and some protein-like inhibitory substances (37). As the present study showed, the invasive ability of S. Typhimurium into Caco-2 cells was significantly reduced by using B. subtilis probiotics and CS (p < 0.05), among which the less pathogen invasion was indicated when B. subtilis PY79 was co-cultured with the Salmonella. Our results were similar to previous published data based on applying probiotics and their metabolites in excluding Salmonella species (1, 19, 31, 32).
The early and late apoptosis (necrosis) were significantly decreased in the most co-culture groups (p < 0.05). As demonstrated in Table 1, the lowest rate of apoptosis and necrosis were shown in B. subtilis PY79, B. subtilis 6633, and the CS (4%), whereas, the highest apoptotic rate were found in S. Typhimurium group and the combined group of S. Typhimurium and B. subtilis 6633 (p < 0.05). The highest rate of necrosis also belonged to the groups including CS (8%), S. Typhimurium, and combination of S. Typhimurium and 4% of CS (p < 0.05). In addition, apoptotic rate was significantly higher or the same as the rate of necrosis in whole groups (p < 0.05).
The ability of Salmonella to induce apoptosis in the initial step of infection, overcoming the immune system and consequence surviving are extensively noticed, because the signals correlated with programed cell death can be affected by the pathogen (38). Flow cytometry assay which has been considered as powerful, sensitive and specific technique (39), was eventually applied to further investigate the viability rate, apoptotic and necrotic of cells in this work. Various rates of apoptotic cells have been reported based on types of bacteria and cell cultures (40), for instance, 67% and 13% of apoptotic cells were respectively observed in the macrophages and in RAW264.7 cell line infected with S. Typhimurium (41). In the present study, apoptotic and necrotic cells were 34% and 16.29%, respectively. When S. Typhimurium was co-cultured with B. subtilis probiotics or CS (4%), the necrosis and apoptosis rates were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) and as a consequence, the survival rates of Caco-2 cells were increased. Poormontaseri et al. (2017), were also found less apoptosis and necrosis of Caco-2 cells in co-cultured CS of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 and C. perfringens group in comparison to C. perfringens group in cell culture using flow cytometry assay (22). As such, results presented here clarified the inhibitory role of the Bacillus probiotics (especially PY79 strain) and their antimicrobial substances over Salmonella cytotoxicity. Co-culture of Lactobacillus casei with S. Typhimurium was reduced the rate of apoptosis in the mice intestinal cells (42).
CONCLUSION
B. subtilis probiotics (PY79 and ATCC 6633 strains) is recommended as beneficial candidates to prevent the invasion of Salmonella. It seems that they probably confer their antagonistic activities by steric hindrance mechanism and producing antimicrobial substances which can prohibit the adherence and invasion of the pathogen to its cell epithelial receptor. However, further in vivo and in vitro assays using animal models and non-cancerous human cell culture should be employed to validate our results.
REFERENCES
- 1.Coconnier M-H, Bernet M-F, Kernéis S, Chauvière G, Fourniat J, Servin AL. Inhibition of adhesion of enteroinvasive pathogens to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB decreases bacterial invasion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1993; 110: 299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Golowczyc M, Mobili P, Garrote G, Abraham A, De Antoni G. Protective action of Lactobacillus kefir carrying S-layer protein against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 118: 264–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Servin AL, Coconnier M-H. Adhesion of probiotic strains to the intestinal mucosa and interaction with pathogens. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 17: 741–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sorokulova IB, Pinchuk IV, Denayrolles M, Osipova IG, Huang JM, Cutting SM, et al. The safety of two Bacillus probiotic strains for human use. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 954–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol 2011; 28: 214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang J-M, La Ragione RM, Nunez A, Cutting SM. Immunostimulatory activity of Bacillus spores. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008; 53: 195–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ye X, Li P, Yu Q, Yang Q. Bacillus subtilis inhibition of enterotoxic Escherichia coli-induced activation of MAPK signaling pathways in Caco-2 cells. Ann Microbiol 2013; 63: 577–581. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharp RJ, Scawen MD, Atkinson T. (1989). Fermentation and downstream processing of Bacillus. In: Harwood CR, editor. In Biotechnology Handbook: Bacillus. New York, Plenum Press; pp. 255–292. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hong HA, Khaneja R, Tam NM, Cazzato A, Tan S, Urdaci M, et al. Bacillus subtilis isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Res Microbiol 2009; 160: 134–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gálvez A, Abriouel H, López RL, Omar NB. Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 120: 51–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nithya V, Halami PM. Evaluation of the probiotic characteristics of Bacillus species isolated from different food sources. Ann Microbiol 2013; 63: 129–137. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parisot J, Carey S, Breukink E, Chan WC, Narbad A, Bonev B. Molecular mechanism of target recognition by subtilin, a class I lanthionine antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 612–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xie J, Zhang R, Shang C, Guo Y. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by an isolated Bacillus subtilis LFB112 that exhibits antimicrobial activity against domestic animal pathogens. Afr J Biotechnol 2009; 8: 5611–5619. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Finlay BB, Falkow S. Salmonella interactions with polarized human intestinal Caco-2 epithelial cells. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 1096–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dunne C, O'Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G, Morrissey D, O'Halloran S, et al. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73(2 Suppl):386S–392S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lehto EM, Salminen SJ. Inhibition of Salmonella Typhimurium adhesion to Caco-2 cell cultures by Lactobacillus strain GG spent culture supernate: only a pH effect? FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997; 18: 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kawarizadeh A, Nojoomi F, Tabatabaei M, Hosseinzadeh S, Farzaneh M. The effect of Bacillus coagulans on cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by Salmonella Typhimurium in HT-29 cell culture. Iran J Microbiol 2019; 11: 305–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thirabunyanon M, Thongwittaya N. Protection activity of a novel probiotic strain of Bacillus subtilis against Salmonella Enteritidis infection. Res Vet Sci 2012; 93: 74–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ozkan AD, Han D, Umu OC, Angun P, Senturk B, Yasa O, et al. Screening and selection of novel animal probiotics isolated from bovine chyme. Ann Microbiol 2013; 63: 1291–1300. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grootaert C, Boon N, Zeka F, Vanhoecke B, Bracke M, Verstraete W, et al. Adherence and viability of intestinal bacteria to differentiated Caco-2 cells quantified by flow cytometry. J Microbiol Methods 2011; 86: 33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Poormontaseri M, Hosseinzadeh S, Shekarforoush SS, Kalantari T. The effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis on the cytotoxicity of Clostridium perfringens type A in Caco-2 cell culture. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17: 150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Castillo NA, de LeBlanc AdM, Galdeano CM, Perdigón G. Probiotics: An alternative strategy for combating salmonellosis: Immune mechanisms involved. Food Res Int 2012; 45: 831–841. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Upadhaya S, Hossiendoust A, Kim I. Probiotics in Salmonella-challenged Hy-Line brown layers. Poult Sci 2016; 95: 1894–1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ramarao N, Lereclus D. Adhesion and cytotoxicity of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis to epithelial cells are FlhA and PlcR dependent, respectively. Microbes Infect 2006; 8: 1483–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hong H, Huang JM, Khaneja R, Hiep L, Urdaci M, Cutting S. The safety of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus indicus as food probiotics. J Appl Microbiol 2008; 105: 510–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rowan NJ, Deans K, Anderson JG, Gemmell CG, Hunter IS, Chaithong T. Putative virulence factor expression by clinical and food isolates of Bacillus spp. after growth in reconstituted infant milk formulae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 3873–3881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abdel-Daim A, Hassouna N, Hafez M, Ashor MSA, Aboulwafa MM. Antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus isolates against Salmonella typhi in vitro. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013:680605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kusters J, Mulders-Kremers G, Van Doornik C, Van Der Zeijst B. Effects of multiplicity of infection, bacterial protein synthesis, and growth phase on adhesion to and invasion of human cell lines by Salmonella Typhimurium. Infect Immun 1993; 61: 5013–5020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lin WH, Yu B, Lin CK, Hwang WZ, Tsen HY. Immune effect of heat-killed multistrain of Lactobacillus acidophilus against Salmonella Typhimurium invasion to mice. J Appl Microbiol 2007; 102: 22–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin C-K, Tsai H-C, Lin P-P, Tsen H-Y, Tsai C-C. Lactobacillus acidophilus LAP5 able to inhibit the Salmonella choleraesuis invasion to the human Caco-2 epithelial cell. Anaerobe 2008; 14: 251–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsai C-C, Hsih H-Y, Chiu H-H, Lai Y-Y, Liu J-H, Yu B, et al. Antagonistic activity against Salmonella infection in vitro and in vivo for two Lactobacillus strains from swine and poultry. Int J Food Microbiol 2005; 102: 185–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tuomola E, Crittenden R, Playne M, Isolauri E, Salminen S. Quality assurance criteria for probiotic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73(2 Suppl):393S–398S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.La Ragione RM, Casula G, Cutting SM, Woodward MJ. Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78: K80 in poultry. Vet Microbiol 2001; 79: 133–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ. Competitive exclusion by Bacillus subtilis spores of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Clostridium perfringens in young chickens. Vet Microbiol 2003; 94: 245–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hammami I, Rhouma A, Jaouadi B, Rebai A, Nesme X. Optimization and biochemical characterization of a bacteriocin from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain 14B for biocontrol of Agrobacterium spp. strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009; 48: 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shelburne CE, An FY, Dholpe V, Ramamoorthy A, Lopatin DE, Lantz MS. The spectrum of antimicrobial activity of the bacteriocin subtilosin A. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 59: 297–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fink SL, Cookson BT. Pyroptosis and host cell death responses during Salmonella infection. Cell Microbiol 2007; 9: 2562–2570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Díaz M, Herrero M, García LA, Quirós C. Application of flow cytometry to industrial microbial bioprocesses. Biochem Eng J 2010; 48: 385–407. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwan WR, Huang X-Z, Hu L, Kopecko DJ. Differential bacterial survival, replication, and apoptosis-inducing ability of Salmonella serovars within human and murine macrophages. Infect Immun 2000; 68: 1005–1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Monack DM, Raupach B, Hromockyj AE, Falkow S. Salmonella Typhimurium invasion induces apoptosis in infected macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 9833–9838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.De LeBlanc AdM, Castillo NA, Perdigon G. Anti-infective mechanisms induced by a probiotic Lactobacillus strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 138: 223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]