Skip to main content
Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online logoLink to Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online
. 2021 Apr 12;17:1176934321994127. doi: 10.1177/1176934321994127

Identification and Analysis of Aux/IAA Family in Acer rubrum

Wenpeng Zhu 1,2, Manyu Zhang 1,2, Jianyi Li 1,2, Hewen Zhao 1,2,3, Wei Ge 1,2,3,, Kezhong Zhang 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC8044571  PMID: 33953533

Abstract

The phytohormone auxin are important in all aspects of plant growth and development. The Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid (Aux/IAA) gene responds to auxin induction as auxin early response gene family. Despite the physiological importance of the Aux/IAA gene, a systematic analysis of the Aux/IAA gene in Acer rubrum has not been reported. This paper describes the characterization of Acer rubrum Aux/IAA genes at the transcriptomic level and Acer yangbiense Aux/IAA genes at the genomic level, with 17 Acer rubrum AUX/IAA genes (ArAux/IAA) and 23 Acer yangbiense Aux/IAA (AyAux/IAA) genes identified. Phylogenetic analysis shows that AyAux/IAA and ArAux/IAA family genes can be subdivided into 4 groups and show strong evolutionary conservatism. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to test the expression profile of ArAux/IAA genes in different tissues under indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) treatment. Most ArAux/IAA genes are responsive to exogenous auxin and have tissue-specific expression. Overall, these results will provide molecular-level insights into auxin metabolism, transport, and signaling in Acer species.

Keywords: AUX/IAA, Acer spp., phylogeny, gene expression, qRT-PCR

Introduction

Auxin play a key role in the regulation of plant physiological processes, including embryogenesis, vascularization, adventitious root development, establishment of apical dominance, and flower and fruit development.1-3 Dynamic spatiotemporal changes in auxin hormone levels can precisely and rapidly trigger genetic reprogramming which requires auxin response genes, such as Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid (Aux/IAA) family, the auxin response factor (ARF) family, the auxin-responsive Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3) family and small auxin upregulated RNA (SAUR).4-7 Numerous studies have shown that the promoters of these auxin-responsive genes contain a number of potential auxin-responsive elements (AuxREs), of which at least one conserved motif (TGTCTG) is present at high frequencies.6 Among these genes, members of the Aux/IAA family have been identified as short-lived nuclear proteins that play a critical role in suppressing the expression levels of ARFs.8,9 In the absence of auxin, AUX/IAA proteins can prevent ARFs from activating the promoters of auxin-responsive genes by DNA-binding to ARFs via domains III and IV. When auxin at high concentrations, these proteins bind to the TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX (TIR1/AFB) and are ubiquitinated and subsequently degraded by the 26s protease10-12 (Figure 1). In general, different TIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA protein combinations have different auxin hormone affinities and different levels of auxin in different tissues and developmental stages, resulting in different auxin corresponding effects.13 Thus, plants can precisely regulate the growth and development of tissues at all stages by regulating the spatial and temporal levels of auxin and translating it into genetically programmed signals.14

Figure1.

Figure1.

The ARF protein family regulation of auxin-inducible genes transcription by forming dimers with auxin response elements (AREs) in the promoters of Auxin-inducible genes. In the absence of Auxin, the AUX/IAA transcriptional repressor recruits TOPLESS family (TPL) co-repressors by interacting with ARFs, which in turn recruit chromatin-modifying enzymes that inhibit downstream Auxin-inducible genes transcription.

The steps of the Auxin response pathway are indicated by numerical arrows. (1) In the presence of auxin, the Aux/IAA, and TIR1/AFB family F-box proteins bind together. (2) The F-box proteins are part of the SCF-type E3 ubiquitin protein ligase complex that transfers activated ubiquitin (Ub) from the E1/E2 enzyme system. (3) Polyubiquitylation of Aux/IAA leads to its degradation. (4) The dimer formed by ARF and AREs is released to activate Auxin-inducible genes transcription.

Studies of the Aux/IAA gene family have been intensively investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana, and studies of Aux/IAA mutants in Arabidopsis have revealed that Aux/IAA exercises different functions during plant growth and development.15-17 So far, 29 Arabidopsis thaliana Aux/IAA (AtAux/IAA) family proteins have been identified, along with an increasing number of candidate genes that may regulate AUX/IAA proteins.18,19 Acer rubrum can be used as a foliage tree for both street trees and landscaping, and is widely used in parks, neighborhoods, and streets.20 So far, most of the research on A.rubrum has been on physiological aspects, but relatively little has been done on the mechanisms of molecular regulation, especially on gene families in the auxin regulatory pathway. Notably, large numbers of Aux/IAA family members have also been found in other plants, including Brassica rapa, Carica papaya, Citrus, Populus trichocarpa.21-24 However, no data on Aux/IAA gene family are available in A.rubrum.

As the genomes of species closely related to the Acer rubrum continue to be reported, such as citrus, longan, and Acer yangbiense,25-27 this has made it possible to gather Aux/IAA family genetic information from the transcriptome level. From a taxonomic point of view, A.yangbiense is more suitable for A.rubrum transcriptome assembly than longan and citrus because it is in the same genus as A.rubrum and it is a wild species, so we used the A.yangbiense genome to assemble the A.rubrum transcriptome.27 Since the A.yangbiense genome has high assembly quality, no recent whole-genome duplication (WGD) events and little chromosomal recombination, it is an important guide to identify the AyAux/IAA family for studying the evolution of ArAux/IAA family members. The aim of this study was to conduct a detailed study of the Aux/IAA gene family in A.rubrum and A.yangbiense based on the A.rubrum transcriptome and the A.yangbiense genome.

Genes of the Aux/IAA family of A.rubrum and A.yangbiense were analyzed, including total number of genes, gene structure, phylogenetic relationships, chromosome localization, conserved sequences, and protein domains. Coanalysis with the AyAux/IAA family helps to uncover specific information about the ArAUX/IAA genes. In addition, we examined the expression pattern of ArAUX/IAA in different tissues under IAA treatment. The results of this paper provide new data for future studies of auxin signaling in A.rubrum.

Materials and Methods

Aux/IAA gene family identification in A.rubrum

To identify Ay Aux/IAA gene family, all A.rubrum RNA-Seq clean data of were retrieved from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA Database (SRR5232063, SRR5234825, SRR5234856) and mapped to the A.yangbiense genome (http://gigadb.org/dataset/100610) with HISAT2 for obtained protein sequences.27,28

The protein sequences of the twenty-nine Arabidopsis Aux/IAAs (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) were selected to search against the transcript of A.rubrum by Tblastn method, AtAux/IAAs (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) were selected to search against the transcript of A.rubrum by Tblastn method, Parameter selection, matrix is BLOSUM62, expect is less than 1e-005, gap-existence is 11, gap-existension is 1, Filter is Low-complexity.14,19,29 The hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of Aux /IAA domain (PF02309) was downloaded from Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/).30 The PF02309 based domains in A.rubrum proteins were identified using HMMER software with E-value cut off 1.0. The filtered A.rubrum genes obtained from the HMM search then subjected to a Pfam bath search to confirm the gene families. SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan/) web server was used to examine the conserved domains of the identified A.rubrum genes. Finally, the candidate ArAux/IAA gene with the UniProt Knowledge Base (UniProtKB-http://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb) to verify its homologues with other species.

Obtained ArA Aux /IAA genes were named according to their Arabidopsis homologs. The protein characteristics, including molecular weight (MW), isoelectric points (pIs), and lengths were online predicted by ProtParam tool.31 Subcellular localization was examined by CELLO software (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/). Identification of Aux/IAA family genes at the genome-wide using the same method for the A.yangbiense.

Gene structure and conserved motif analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was carried out with MEGA7 software, the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed with bootstrap values tested for 1000 trails, models with the lowest BIC scores is JTT + G + I to describe the substitution pattern the best. This analysis involved 95 amino acid sequences. All positions with less than 80% site coverage were eliminated, that is, fewer than 20% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position.31,32 MEME was used to find the conserved motif of Ar Aux/IAA proteins.33 The candidate Aux/IAA proteins were further examined to confirm the presence of Aux/IAA repeats using Pfam and SMART software.34 The image data were displayed in Tbtools.35

GO functional identification

The Ar Aux/IAA protein sequences were compared against the NCBI database using BLASTP. The Gene Ontology (GO) terms of functional annotation were analyzed using Blast2GO software (https://www.blast2go.com/) with default parameters. The annotations of GO terms were investigated using Gene Ontology Consortium (http://geneontology.org/).

Plant materials and RNA extraction

The plant material for this experiment was obtained from the branches of 3-year-old A.rubrum from the teaching nursery of Beijing University of Agriculture (40.09º N, 116.30º E). Branches of similar growth were treated by immersion in water and IAA solution (300 mg/L) for 1 hour, with 3 biological replicates for each group. The phloem, mature leaves, and young leaves were taken from the treated branches for RNA extraction. RNA samples were extracted with the Tiangen RNA prep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biomarket, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using the Tianroot RNA extraction method, and then stored at −80°C for backup.

Expression analysis

For qRT-PCR expression analysis, RNA samples were reverse transcribed by using the TRAN Reverse Transcription System (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China). Each qRT-PCR reaction contained a final volume of 20 µL including 1 µL cDNA template, 0.5 µL gene-specific primers (10 µM), 10 µL TransStart Tip Green qPCR Supermix (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China), and 8 µL ddH2O. MN026864, an actin gene used in Acer palmatum research. It was selected as a reference gene to standardize the expression levels of ArAux/IAA target genes.36 The PCR primers were designed outside the conserved region to produce amplification products with 100 to 200 bp. All primer sequences were listed in detail in (Table 1). The PCR parameters applied here were as follows: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 5 s at 95°C and 15 s at 60°C. Finally, melting curve analysis was performed to verify the specificity of the primers. The relative expression level of the A.rubrum gene was determined by the 2−△△Ct method. Values represent the mean calculated from 3 biological replicates and 3 technical replicates. Significance analysis of ArAux/IAA expression in different treatments using t-test and 1-way ANOVA for ArAux/IAA expression in different tissues. Heatmap representation was illustrated using expression value in GraphPad Prism 8.

Table1.

Specific primers used for RT-PCR in this study.

Code Gene names Primer sequnences (5′→3′) Length of amplified fragment (bp)
1 ArAux/IAA01 F TTAACTTGGAAGCGACAGAGC 144
R GTGTGGTGTTGGAATCGTCTC
2 ArAux/IAA02 F ACTGGATGCTAGTTGGAGATGT 104
R TCCACAAGAAGTCAAGCCTCT
3 ArAux/IAA03 F AACTCATTGGCAACCACTTCG 158
R TCAAGAGCAGAAGACAGTTCCT
4 ArAux/IAA04 F ACTGCTGCTTCTAACAACAACA 173
R CCATCCATGCTAACCTTGACAA
5 ArAux/IAA05 F GTGGTCTCCTCCTCTTCTTCTT 101
R GCTACAGAATCGGCACTCCT
6 ArAux/IAA06 F CTCCACCATCTCCTTCTTCTCA 197
R CACCACCACCACCAAGTAGA
7 ArAux/IAA07 F AACACCACCTTGACCACCAT 122
R AAAGTTCTCCAGGGCACATCT
8 ArAux/IAA08 F GCCAAGATGTTCAGTTCCTTCA 143
R ATCCAGTCACCATCCTTGTCTT
9 ArAux/IAA09 F CACCACTCGCTCGTCTTCT 190
R CACCACCACCTCCATTACCA
10 ArAux/IAA10 F CCAGCCAAGCCTCCTTCTAA 119
R ATGTTGTTGTTGCCACTCTCC
11 ArAux/IAA11 F TTACGAGGACAAGGATGGTGAT 147
R GTGCTTGAGTTCTTGGTTGGT
12 ArAux/IAA12 F ACGAGGACAACGAAGGAGAC 199
R AGCCAGACTCAGAAATCATTGC
13 ArAux/IAA13 F GGTGGTGCTTGTTTGTTGGA 115
R GGCTCTCATTCGTCTGGACT
14 ArAux/IAA14 F TGGAATGGTGAACAAGCAAGAG 105
R AGCATCCTGTCTCCTTCGTTAT
15 ArAux/IAA15 F TATGGAACTCTCATCGGCTCTT 112
R ATCCTTCAGACGACTCTCACTC
16 ArAux/IAA16 F CAATGTTCTGAGCCGAGATGG 102
R ATCCAGTCACCGTCCTTGTC
17 ArAux/IAA17 F CCAGCGTATCAGCCTCCATA 148
R GTGACCAGGAACAGCATTAGAG

Results

Identification of the Aux/IAA Gene family members in A.rubrum and A.yangbiense

An HMM-based search for AUX/IAA gene families in A.rubrum and A.yangbiense with Pfam accession PF02309 resulted in the identification of 70 genes and 68 with Aux/IAA domains. After careful verification, 32 and 40 genes with B3 and ARF domains were identified, confirming the deletion of the ARF gene family. A search of all identified genes in the UniProt database using megaBLAST further confirmed the identification and revealed that most of the top hits were Aux/IAA proteins from the Arabidopsis genomes. The domains of candidate genes were tested by SMART and InterProScan web servers. After manual screening and removal of variable splicing, 17 A.rubrum and 23 A.yangbiense genes were obtained. Identified genes were named from ArAux/IAA1 to ArAux/IAA17 and AyAux/IAA1 to AyAux/IAA23 based on the similarity of their domains to Arabidopsis. Information of these genes, including gene name, loucus Id, protein length, basic parameters of the deduced peptide and CELLO localization are detailed in Table 2. The sizes of the predicted ArAux/IAA proteins varied remarkably from 113 amino acids (ArAux/IAA12) to 379 amino acids (ArAux/IAA04) with an average of 258 amino acids and their predicted PI and molecular masses ranged from 4.77 (ArAux/IAA12) to 9.72 (ArAux/IAA17) and 12761.40 to 40855.23 Da, respectively. Subcellular localization predictions showed that all ArAux/IAA proteins were locate the nucleus. This prediction is consistent with the report that Aux/IAA proteins can inhibit the activation of downstream genes by ARFs in the absence of auxin. In the nature of these proteins, the ArAux/IAA family of encoded proteins appears to share many similarities with the AyAux/IAA family, predicted AyAux/IAA protein sizes ranged from 107 amino acids (AyAux/IAA4) to 378 amino acids (AyAux/IAA02), with a mean value of 250 differing little from the predicted ArAux/IAA protein size and little difference in predicted Mass (Da) and PI values.

Table 2.

Gene name, loucus ID, sequence length, molecular weight, theoretical isoelectric points (pI) and CELLO localization of ArAux/IAAs and AyAux/IAAs.

Gene Loucus ID Length (aa) PI Mass (Da) CELLO localization
ArAux/IAA01 MSTRG.6632.1 194 6.62 21527.32 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA02 MSTRG.859.1 184 5.96 20599.36 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA03 MSTRG.20621.1 361 6.96 39368.32 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA04 MSTRG.13561.1 379 7.53 40855.23 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA05 MSTRG.10030.1 277 6.31 29665.93 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA06 MSTRG.1050.1 293 9.1 31702.41 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA07 MSTRG.11555.1 298 8.72 31466.4 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA08 MSTRG.860.1 256 8.14 28129.19 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA09 MSTRG.6630.1 247 7.65 26921.59 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA10 MSTRG.9882.1 249 8.77 27537.56 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA11 MSTRG.3926.1 220 5.7 23816.92 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA12 MSTRG.12318.1 113 4.77 12761.4 Nuclear*
ArAux/IAA13 MSTRG.3923.1 186 5.35 20981.81 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA14 MSTRG.26400.1 314 9.36 34327.51 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA15 MSTRG.3740.2 353 8.53 37802.52 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA16 MSTRG.11773.1 282 8.73 30691.68 Nuclear
ArAux/IAA17 MSTRG.11318.1 173 9.72 19524.07 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA01 AcyanUnG0000400.1 361 6.96 39368.32 Nuclear*
AyAux/IAA02 Acyan10G0083700.1 378 6.13 40616.93 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA03 Acyan09G0169100.1 184 6.59 20608.21 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA04 Acyan06G0085500.1 107 6.27 12198.22 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA05 Acyan05G0135400.1 159 5.21 18060.98 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA06 Acyan05G0077200.1 158 5.21 17963.86 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA07 Acyan05G0069200.1 184 5.96 20599.36 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA08 Acyan05G0056600.1 236 5.79 26873.15 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA09 Acyan04G0158000.1 353 8.53 37802.52 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA10 Acyan04G0141800.1 282 8.73 30691.68 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA11 Acyan04G0141700.1 242 9.21 26000.4 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA12 Acyan04G0082500.1 337 9.15 36940.51 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA13 Acyan04G0082200.1 337 9.15 36940.51 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA14 Acyan03G0094100.1 186 5.35 20981.81 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA15 Acyan02G0109700.1 193 6.44 21889.91 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA16 Acyan02G0109600.1 259 6.84 28468.15 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA17 Acyan02G0084100.1 220 5.7 23816.92 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA18 Acyan02G0083400.1 201 8.32 22382.72 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA19 Acyan02G0068900.1 255 7.66 27647.3 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA20 Acyan01G0104800.1 264 8.77 29453.85 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA21 Acyan01G0078300.1 256 8.14 28129.19 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA22 Acyan01G0078200.1 298 8.72 31466.4 Nuclear
AyAux/IAA23 Acyan01G0010900.1 293 9.1 31702.41 Nuclear

Conservative domain, gene structure and chromosomal distribution analysis of ArAux/IAA and AyAux/IAA genes

Through HISAT2 splicing, we have a preliminary understanding of the possible chromosomal location and intron structure of the ArAux/IAA gene. Through comparing the cDNA sequences with the A.yangbiense genomic DNA sequences, Intronic, and exonic regions were identified for each ArAux/IAA gene validated by A.yangbiense gene gff file, the number and position of introns and exonic were revealed (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Conservative domain, gene structure and chromosomal distribution of ArAux/IAA (A) and AyAux/IAA (B) genes.

The pfam are shown in yellow, exon and CDS are shown in green, Chromosome numbers are listed next to the chromosome (yellow) and gene names are shown in red.

For better analysis of the similarities and differences between ArAux/IAA and AyAux/IAA, the chromosomal location and intron structure of AyAux/IAA are also shown in Figure 2B. The AyAux/IAA and ArAux/IAA genes were distributed in chro1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10 and most of them with 3 to 5 exons was conserved with single domain Aux/IAA. However, 6 genes ArAux/IAA02, ArAux/IAA12, ArAux/IAA17, AyAux/IAA03, AyAux/IAA13, and AyAux/IAA23 were found had less exons and shorted sequences length than the average genes. Because ArAux/IAA was identified at the transcriptomic level, the number of members was less than that of A.yangbiense, but the chromosomal location and intron structure were consistent with that of A.yangbiense.

Phylogeny and motif distribution of ArAux/IAA and AyAux/IAA proteins

Because there are different families and genera in the selected species, we selected amino acid sequences for phylogenetic tree construction, taking into account the low selection pressure on nucleic acids and the large number of mutations in the evolutionary process. Ninety-five amino acid sequences were aligned using Clustalx, including Aux/IAA encoded proteins of A.rubrum, A.yangbiense, Arabidopsis, and citrus and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA software (Figure 3A). The generated trees were divided into 4 groups, named ArA, ArB, ArC, and ArD according to their phylogeny. Both phylogenetic trees and conservative motif matched well with previously studied plants Arabidopsis and citrus19,23 (Figure 3B). Group A contained the most members with 15 A.rubrum and 17 A.yangbiense Aux/IAA and all had conserved sequences of motifs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and most contained motifs 6, 7, and 8. The B group contained 2 AyAux/IAAs and 3 ArAUX/IAAs, and excluding AyAux/IAA22, all other members of the Sapindales members had motifs of 1, 2, 3, and 10 and showed high conservatism. Whereas more AyAux/IAA (4) were classified into Group C than ArAux/IAA (1), and up to 6 members of the same Sapindales citrus were also classified into Group C. From the results of the phylogenetic tree, it is possible that there are Group C ArAux/IAA members that were not identified. motifs 1 and 3 were high frequency in group C, and there was also less variety in motifs than in the A and B groups. Group D has the lowest number of members and the lowest number of motifs of the 4 groups. Overall, groups A and B possess more intact proteins, while C and D truncated proteins predominate, although all members possess conserved domains of Aux/IAA, which can also be demonstrated on motifs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Neighboring trees (NJ) and representative conserved motif patterns of Aux/IAA proteins of A.rubrum, A.yangbiense, citrus, and Arabidopsis: (A) a phylogenetic tree was constructed for 95 full-length Aux/IAA proteins from 5 plant species, including A.rubrum (Ar), A.yangbiense (Ay), citrus (Cit), Arabidopsis (At), (B) distribution of Aux/IAA proteins of 10 motifs in 4 species, and (C) 5 motifs representing 4 domains I, II, III, and IV were mapped on all Aux/IAA proteins by different colors.

Gene Ontology functional analysis of A.rubrum and A.yangbiense Aux/IAAs

Molecular Function (MF), Biological Processes (BP), and Cellular Components (CC) are the 3 main GO categories that help elucidate gene signatures and various functions of proteins.37 The GO annotations of Aux/IAAs for 17 A.rubrum and 23 A.yangbiense were further investigated using Blast2GO software (Figure 4). Seventeen ArAux/IAAs are annotated to BP and CC, and 11 are annotated to MF, MF results showed 11 genes with DNA−binding transcription factor activity (GO:0003700) and transcription regulator activity (GO:0140110) related, indicating the ArAux/IAAs bind to ARF to regulate genes in nucleus (Figure 4A). It’s worth noting that All genes are involved in the nucleus in CC (GO:0005634), suggesting that Aux/IAA are localized in the nucleus, consistent with the prediction of subcellular localization (Table 1). Mover, the response to chemical (GO: 0042221), response to endogenous stimulus (GO:0009719) and signal transduction (GO:0007165) were found in the BP category, suggesting these ArAux/IAA is closely related to auxin regulatory pathways and auxin hormone correspondence (Figure 4A). The go annotation results of AyAux/IAA are similar to those of ArAux/IAA (Figure 4B). Interestingly, on MF, AyAux/IAA, like ArAux/IAA, is only partially annotated to transcription regulator activity (ArAUX/IAA has 11, AyAux/IAA has 17), and these Aux/IAA in Phylogeny also exhibits proximity to similar characteristics (Figure 3).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of Aux/IAA genes in A.rubrum (A) and A.yangbiense (B).

CC: MF: molecular function (blue); cellular component (green); BP: biological process (red).

qRT-PCR Quantification of ArAux/IAA genes in different tissues in response to IAA treatment

To understand the spatial pattern of ArAux/IAA gene expression, transcript accumulation in young leaves (YL), mature leaves (ML) and phloem (P) was assessed under IAA (300 mg/L) treatment and clear water (CK) treatment. The expression pattern was studied by qRT-PCR for 17 expressed ArAux/IAA genes. The results showed that the genes ArAux/IAA1-7, ArAux/IAA11, and ArAux/IAA12 responded positively to IAA treatment in different tissues (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Expression profiles of ArAux/IAA in new leaves (YL), mature leaves (ML), and phloem (P). Clear water treatment (CK) is shown in blue, IAA treatment (IAA) in yellow, genes that were not significantly different did not show.

The expression patterns were revealed by qRT-PCR. Biological triplicates were averaged and analyzed statistically using a t-test (Differences between treatments,*P < .05, **P < .01). Bars indicate the SD of the 3 experimental repetitions.

For most ArAux/IAA genes, the highest expression levels are found in phloem, which is known to give the tissue an important role in the polar transport of auxin. Some ArAux/IAA genes showed significant preferential expression in specific tissues, such as ArAux/IAA3 and ArAux/IAA4 showed high expression in mature leaves and ArAux/IAA1 showed the highest expression in the phloem. Tissue-preferential expression of Aux/IAA genes may indicate distinct roles in specific plant tissues and developmental processes.

The first Aux/IAA gene was identified because of its rapid response to growth hormone induction. All of the ArAux/IAAs tested, except (ArAux/IAA 8-10, ArAux/IAA13-17) showed that their transcript accumulation was positively regulated by auxin. The data indicated that transcript accumulation of 9 ArAux/IAAs genes was significantly enhanced. Interestingly, there were genes whose expression accumulation is upregulated differently depending on the tissue, for example, ArAux/IAA3, ArAux/IAA4, and ArAux/IAA7 genes are sensitive to auxin in mature leaves and phloem, while young leaves do not respond. These data suggest in addition to being major molecular in the auxin response, the expression of some Aux/IAAs is influenced by unexplored factors in addition to being induced by auxin and thus involved in plant developmental processes.

Discussion

Aux/IAAs function in various biological processes in plants including growth and development processes, via bind with ARFs and prevent activation of auxin-responsive genes.10,38 Functional analysis and expression profiling of AUX/IAA helps to reveal how auxin regulates plant growth and development in vivo and responds to environmental changes in spatio-temporal specific ways. With the advent of genome sequencing technology, the AUX/IAA gene family has been identified by whole-genome analysis in more than 30 species of plants, including 29 genes from Arabidopsis, 35 from Populus trichocarpa, 26 from Citrus.19,23,24 The identification of members of the ArAUX/IAAs described here provides new insights into the changes that have occurred during the evolution of the AUX/IAA gene. And based on this, through the identification of AyAux/IAA genes at the genome level of the A.yangbiense, which is traditionally taxonomically closely related to the A.rubrum, we found that both the molecular structure and the phylogeny are highly related to ArAUX/IAA. The AUX/IAA family of genes is slightly contracted in A.yangbiense compared to Arabidopsis (29 genes) and Citrus (26 genes).39 Consistent evolutionary trends for ArAux/IAA, AyAux/IAA, and CitAux/IAA, based on the phylogenetic results, suggesting that the Aux/IAA of these 3 plants originated from a single ancestor. The number of gene members showed that AyAux/IAA and ArAux/IAA members were less than AtAux/IAA. The evolutionary tree analysis revealed that the number of Aux/IAA members had a specific preference in evolution, with the 4 species in clade ArA having the most Aux/IAA members and the highest proportion; in clade ArB, the degree of member expansion was not significant; in clade ArC, compared to AtAux/IAA (2 genes) and ArAu/IxAA (1 gene), AyAux/IAA (4 genes) and CitAux/IAA (6 genes) members were expanded to a small extent; in clade ArD, no AyAux/IAA members were found.21,24 Few Aux/IAA genes were identified in lower plants, such as Marchantia polymorpha (1 gene), and Physcomitrella patens (3 genes), Selaginella moellendorffii (9 genes), compared to higher plants.39-41 Thus, the amplification of Aux/IAA gene members in higher plants, on the 1 hand, creates functional redundancy and, on the other hand, appears to be associated with other new functions in order to adapt to changes in the environment.14,42 A.yangbiense, the first Acer species to have a high quality genome, has a similar whole-genome duplication (WGD) to that of grapes, with no recent WGD events, and is an endangered species only found in Yangbi County in Yunnan Province in Southwest China, this unique geography has created species isolation, allowing limited genetic exchange.27,43 This also explains why there are fewer Aux/IAA members for A.rubrum compared to Arabidopsis and citrus. Although the genome of the A.yangbiense provides a high quality reference for the Acer, we are currently unable to identify the full ArAux/IAA family of genes through the transcriptome because of the spatio-temporally specific expression of genes. However, the 17 ArAux/IAAs identified were analyzed for evolutionary tree, motif, and expression, and the results showed some representativeness.

The conserved sequences and structural domains of the Aux/IAA genes involved in the construction of the tree were investigated (Figure 3B, C). The diversity of differentiated branches is also reflected in the variation of conserved structures of Aux/IAA proteins. Most Aux/IAA proteins possess 4 conserved signature domains: Domain I, II, III, and IV.6 Domain I has been identified as an inhibitory domain with the ethylene response factor (ERF)-related amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif “LxLxL,” which recruits a TOPLESS (TPL) co-repressor.44 Domain II is an auxin degron with a conserved “GWPPV” motif, which can interact directly with SCFTIR1 and is closely related to TIR1-mediated ubiquitination.45,46 Domain III contains a 2-sided βαα-fold that is similar in structure and function to the DNA recognition motif.47 Recent studies have confirmed the role of the βαα-fold in homo- and heterodimerization with Aux/IAA or with ARF proteins.6,48 Domain IV contains a conserved motif “GDVP” between β4 and α2, the motif contributes to the electrostatic interaction of proteins.48,49 The Domain III and Domain IV together form type I/II Phox and Bem1p (PB1) domains.5 The clade ArA has the largest number of Aux/IAA members and also the most intact structural domain, and the structural integrity suggest that these proteins are involved in the Aux/IAA functional model that is degraded under the regulation of auxin. The clade ArB has 3 complete structural domains and a longer conserved sequence (motif10) (Except AtAux/IAA11, AtAux/IAA13). Most of clade ArC Aux/IAA genes lacked domain1 (except CitAux/IAA25, AtAux/IAA20, AtAux/IAA 22), and also Aux/IAA lacked domain2 (AtAux/IAA 22, CitAux/IAA23). The clade ArA has the least number of members and is missing Domain1 and 2. The close association of AtAux/IAA18, AtAux/IAA 26, and AtAux/IAA 28 in the clade ArD with the bryophyte Aux/IAA implies that the formation of the clade ArA may be traced back to plant origins, and that the evolution of additional members of A.rubrum and A.yangbiense over a long period of evolution has led to the expansion of clade ArD membership, and that this trend is present in all 4 species involved in the composition of the phylogenetic tree.50 Whereas group D lacks Domains 1 and 2 (motifs 5 and 3), such incomplete Domains are common in the evolution of Aux/IAA proteins, such as the 3 Aux/IAA proteins in tomato (SIAux/IAA13, SIAux/IAA16, SIAux/IAA20) and the 5 Aux/IAA proteins in potato (StAux/IAA13, StAux/IAA15, StAux/IAA16, StAux/IAA18, and StAux/IAA20) were all found to be deficient in domains I and II.39,51 70.6% of ArAux/IAA (12) and 73.9% of AyAux/IAA (17) had complete conserved signature domains. In contrast to AyAux/IAA, the simultaneous absence of Domain I and Domain II was found in ArAux/IAA17 that did not show differential expression under IAA treatment. This lack of specific response of Aux/IAA to IAA because of a Domain deficiency has also been found in citrus (CitAux/IAA 24, 25)23 and ArAux/IAA17 may have a specific function in the A.rubrum.The absence of this domain may allow for a more diverse role for Aux/IAA in the axuin signaling pathway and the response of Aux/IAA to changes in the environment in which the plant is located.

Using the YN model to calculate the Ks values,52 the dot plot shows that the longer syntenic blocks between A.yangbiense and grape are nearly 1:1, indicating that A.yangbiense has a similar evolutionary history to grape and has not undergoing a WGD event after the core eudicot common hexaploidization.27 Additionally, 11 homologous pairs(ArAux/IAA9/AyAux/IAA19, ArAux/IAA10/AyAUX/IAA20, ArAUX/IAA8/AyAUX/IAA21, ArAUX/IAA4/AyAUX/IAA2, ArAUX/IAA15/AyAUX/IAA9, ArAUX/IAA3/AyAUX/IAA1, ArAUX/IAA13/AyAUX/IAA14, ArAUX/IAA2/AyAUX/IAA7, ArAUX/IAA14/AyAUX/IAA12, ArAUX/IAA5/AyAUX/IAA23, and ArAUX/IAA7/AyAUX/IAA22) were found which had close evolutionary relationships similar gene structures. More than half of the homologous pairs and overlapping chromosomal distribution mean that the evolutionary history of A.rubrum and A.yangbiense is similar. The presence of these homologous pairs in different species suggests that they evolved from a common ancestor and are highly conserved in evolution. To our knowledge, few functional analyses of AUX/IAA in the genus Acer have been performed. Therefore, this gene family deserves continued future research to investigate the potential specific functions of the AUX/IAA family that diverged during evolution in the Acer.

The expression pattern of ArAUX/IAA in young leaves, mature leaves, and phloem under IAA treatment was analyzed. In general, there is tissue-specific expression of AUX/IAA in other species studied, and there is an increase in expression with IAA treatment.23,53,54 This study found that some of the ArAUX//IAA expression patterns were different in mature and young leaves, and that the expression of ArAXU/IAA in mature leaves was significantly higher than that in young leaves under IAA treatment. The ArAUX/IAA gene exhibits a different expression pattern in response to exogenous auxin. Interestingly, 9 ArAUX/IAA, 4 ArAUX/IAA, and 8 ArAUX/IAA genes in the bast were significantly increased in expression with IAA treatment, while the expression of the remaining ArAUX/IAA did not change significantly. The dynamics of the ArAUX/IAA family of genes under IAA treatment suggests that different ArAUX/IAA genes are involved in the changes in auxin regulation. Notably, ArAux/IAA16 with absence of Domain 1 and ArAux/IAA17 with adsence of Domain 1 and 2 were consistently expressed at low levels under Auxin. This atypical Aux/IAA whose expression pattern is also highly restricted in other species,19,23,51 and this atypical ArAUX/IAA gene may have a specific function in auxin-mediated plant development that needs to be investigated subsequently

Conclusions

In this study, 17 ArAux/IAA and 23 AyAux/IAA were identified in Acer yangbiense and Acer rubrum. Most ArAux/IAA genes can be expressed in at least 1 tissue, and some genes show tissue specificity and increased expression under IAA treatment. We found 2 ArAux/IAAs that responded to exogenous IAA treatment in mature leaves but not in young leaves, which likely implies that these 2 genes are specifically involved in the auxin regulation. The next step of identification and functional analysis of the auxion responsive elements of these Aux/IAA gene promoters will facilitate the explain of their transcriptional changes and their biological functions. In addition, our work reveals that AyAux/IAA and ArAux/IAA are highly conserved in evolution, with 11 pairs of genes that are highly consistent in conserved sequence and chromosomal localization, and these genes are also highly inbred with CitAux/IAA by phylogeny analysis. Although AyAux/IAA and ArAux/IAA require further analysis, the results on gene structure and gene expression levels studied here will help to accelerate a deeper study of Aux/IAA function in Acer species.

Acknowledgments

The authors hope to express their appreciation to the reviewers for this manuscript.

Footnotes

Author contributions: Kezhong Zhang, Wei Ge and Hewen Zhao designed the study; Manyu Zhang and Jianyi Li collected and prepared the materials; Wenpeng Zhu conducted the experiments and data analysis. Wenpeng Zhu wrote the manuscript; Wei Ge revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was supported by the Beijing Excellent Training Project to WG (grant No. 68) and Beijing Natural Science Fund-Municipal Education Commission Jointly Funded Projects (grant No. KZ201810020029).

References

  • 1. Lau S, Jürgens G, De Smet I. The evolving complexity of the auxin pathway. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1738-1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Weijers D, Friml J. SnapShot: auxin signaling and transport. Cell. 2009;136:1172-1172. e1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Goldental-Cohen S, Israeli A, Ori N, Yasuor H. Auxin response dynamics during wild-type and entire flower development in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58:1661-1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Abel S, Nguyen MD, Theologis A. The PS-IAA4/5-like family of early auxin-inducible mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Biol. 1995;251:533-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G. Auxin response factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10:453-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hagen G, Guilfoyle T. Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;49:373-385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chen Y, Hao X, Cao J. Small auxin upregulated RNA (SAUR) gene family in maize: identification, evolution, and its phylogenetic comparison with Arabidopsis, rice, and sorghum. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56:133-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dreher KA, Brown J, Saw RE, Callis J. The Arabidopsis Aux/IAA protein family has diversified in degradation and auxin responsiveness. Plant Cell. 2006;18:699-714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lavy M, Estelle M. Mechanisms of auxin signaling. Development. 2016;143:3226-3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Weijers D, Benkova E, Jäger KE, et al. Developmental specificity of auxin response by pairs of ARF and Aux/IAA transcriptional regulators. EMBO J. 2005;24:1874-1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Villalobos LIAC, Lee S, De Oliveira C, et al. A combinatorial TIR1/AFB–Aux/IAA co-receptor system for differential sensing of auxin. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:477-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tan X, Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Sharon M, et al. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 2007;446:640-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Trenner J, Poeschl Y, Grau J, Gogol-Döring A, Quint M, Delker C. Auxin-induced expression divergence between Arabidopsis species may originate within the TIR1/AFB–AUX/IAA–ARF module. J Exp Bot. 2017;68:539-552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Luo J, Zhou J-J, Zhang J-Z. Aux/IAA gene family in plants: molecular structure, regulation, and function. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ellis CM, Nagpal P, Young JC, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ, Reed JW. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR1 and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR2 regulate senescence and floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 2005;132:4563-4574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Overvoorde PJ, Okushima Y, Alonso JM, et al. Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3282-3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rinaldi MA, Liu J, Enders TA, Bartel B, Strader LC. A gain-of-function mutation in IAA16 confers reduced responses to auxin and abscisic acid and impedes plant growth and fertility. Plant Mol Biol. 2012;79:359-373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mockaitis K, Estelle M. Auxin receptors and plant development: a new signaling paradigm. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:55-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liscum E, Reed J. Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;49:387-400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Walters RS, Yawney HW., Acer rubrum L. Red maple. Silvics N Am. 1990;2:60-69. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Paul P, Dhandapani V, Rameneni JJ, et al. Genome-wide analysis and characterization of Aux/IAA family genes in Brassica rapa. PloS One. 2016;11:e0151522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Liu K, Yuan C, Feng S, et al. Genome-wide analysis and characterization of Aux/IAA family genes related to fruit ripening in papaya (Carica papaya L.). BMC Genomics. 2017;18:1-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Xie R, Pang S, Ma Y, et al. The ARF, AUX/IAA and GH3 gene families in citrus: genome-wide identification and expression analysis during fruitlet drop from abscission zone A. Mol Genet Genomics. 2015;290:2089-2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kalluri UC, DiFazio SP, Brunner AM, Tuskan GA. Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ellegren H. Genome sequencing and population genomics in non-model organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 2014;29:51-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lin Y, Min J, Lai R, et al. Genome-wide sequencing of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) provides insights into molecular basis of its polyphenol-rich characteristics. Gigascience. 2017;6:gix023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yang J, Wariss HM, Tao L, et al. De novo genome assembly of the endangered Acer yangbiense, a plant species with extremely small populations endemic to Yunnan Province, China. GigaScience. 2019;8:giz085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:907-915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D427-D432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kumar S, Stecher G., Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870-1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins. 2006;64:643-651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Letunic I, Bork P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D493-D496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools-an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1194-1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhu L, Ma Q, Li S, Wen J, Yan K, Li Q. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR analyses of Acer palmatum under abiotic stress. Phyton. 2020;89:385. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Reed JW. Roles and activities of Aux/IAA proteins in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:420-425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu W, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Evolution analysis of the Aux/IAA gene family in plants shows dual origins and variable nuclear localization signals. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bowman JL, Kohchi T, Yamato KT, et al. Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell. 2017;171:287-304. e215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kumar R, Agarwal P, Pareek A, Tyagi AK, Sharma AK. Genomic survey, gene expression, and interaction analysis suggest diverse roles of ARF and Aux/IAA proteins in Solanaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2015;33:1552-1572. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Weijers D, Wagner D. Transcriptional responses to the auxin hormone. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67:539-574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chen Y, Yang Q, Zhu G. Acer yangbiense (Aceraceae), a new species from Yunnan, China. Novon. 2003:296-299. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Szemenyei H, Hannon M, Long JA. TOPLESS mediates auxin-dependent transcriptional repression during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Science. 2008;319:1384-1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kepinski S, Leyser O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature. 2005;435:446-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ramos JA, Zenser N, Leyser O, Callis J. Rapid degradation of auxin/indoleacetic acid proteins requires conserved amino acids of domain II and is proteasome dependent. Plant Cell. 2001;13:2349-2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Abel S, Oeller PW, Theologis A. Early auxin-induced genes encode short-lived nuclear proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91:326-330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chapman EJ, Estelle M. Mechanism of auxin-regulated gene expression in plants. Ann Rev Genet. 2009;43:265-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G. Getting a grasp on domain III/IV responsible for Auxin response factor–IAA protein interactions. Plant Sci. 2012;190:82-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Remington DL, Vision TJ, Guilfoyle TJ, Reed JW. Contrasting modes of diversification in the Aux/IAA and ARF gene families. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1738-1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Audran-Delalande C, Bassa C, Mila I, Regad F, Zouine M, Bouzayen M. Genome-wide identification, functional analysis and expression profiling of the Aux/IAA gene family in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:659-672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evolut. 2000;17:32-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Shen C, Yue R, Yang Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling analysis of the Aux/IAA gene family in Medicago truncatula during the early phase of Sinorhizobium meliloti infection. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Wang Y, Deng D, Bian Y, Lv Y, Xie Q. Genome-wide analysis of primary auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family in maize (Zea mays. L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:3991-4001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES