Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249939

An unusual case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)

Olga Spekker 1,*, Luca Kis 1, Andrea Deák 2, Eszter Makai 3, György Pálfi 1, Orsolya Anna Váradi 1,4, Erika Molnár 1
Editor: Mark Spigelman5
PMCID: PMC8046221  PMID: 33852636

Abstract

Ancient human remains exhibiting bony changes consistent with osteoarticular tuberculosis (OATB) indicate that the disease has afflicted mankind for millennia. Nonetheless, not many pediatric OATB cases have been published in the paleopathological literature–from Hungary, only three cases have been described up to now. In our paper, we demonstrate a child (S0603) from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (northwestern Hungary), who represents a unique case of OATB regarding both the pattern and severity of the observed bony changes. During the macromorphological and radiological investigations, the most serious alterations were discovered in the upper thoracic spine–the development of osteolytic lesions led to severe bone loss and consequent collapse and fusion of several adjacent vertebrae. The pathological process terminated in a sharp, rigid angular kyphosis. Disruption of the normal spine curvature resulted in consequent deformation of the whole thoracic wall–it became “rugby-ball-shaped”. The overall nature and pattern of the detected alterations, as well as their resemblance to those of described in previously published archaeological and modern cases from the pre-antibiotic era indicate that they are most consistent with OATB. Based on the severity and extent of the lesions, as well as on the evidence of secondary healing, S0603 suffered from TB for a long time prior to death. Besides body deformation, OATB resulted in consequent disability in daily activities, which would have required regular and significant care from others to survive. It implies that in the Árpádian Age community of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag, there was a willingness to care for people in need. Detailed archaeological case studies can give us a unique insight into the natural history and different presentations of OATB. Furthermore, they can provide paleopathologists with a stronger basis for diagnosing TB and consequently, with a more sensitive means of assessing TB frequency in past populations.

Introduction

Despite growing interest in the last few decades, pediatric tuberculosis (TB) as a main cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in TB-endemic regions, remains relatively neglected today [16]. However, particular attention should be paid to eliminate or at least control TB in the foreseeable future [1, 2, 57]. Childhood TB is an important TB control indicator, since it reflects recent and/or ongoing transmission in the community, as it is usually acquired postnatally from an adult contact with clinically active TB disease [2, 3, 810]. Children and adolescents with latent TB infection represent reservoirs for future transmission following disease reactivation, often many years after the primary infection; and therefore, can provide the source of future epidemics [2, 3, 8]. According to the latest Global Tuberculosis Report from the World Health Organization (WHO), children under the age of 15 years accounted for approximately 11% of all TB cases and 13.8% of all TB deaths in 2018 –an estimated 1.1 million children became ill with TB and about 205,000 children died of TB worldwide [7]. Nevertheless, the actual global burden of pediatric TB is very likely higher as substantial challenges in diagnosis and surveillance compromise the quality of epidemiological data on the disease [1, 3, 4, 7, 911].

Once infected with TB bacteria (i.e., members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; MTBC), children are at particularly higher risk of rapid progression to clinically active TB disease than adults, with the vast majority of them (>95%) developing it within the first 12 months after exposure [1, 6, 813]. Moreover, children are more prone to develop severe, extra-pulmonary forms of TB (e.g., tuberculous meningitis and miliary TB) that are associated with high morbidity and mortality [1, 2, 6, 8, 1315]. Age-related differences in both the innate and adaptive immune responses to TB may play a crucial role in increasing the vulnerability of children to the disease compared to adults [1, 13]. Based on pre-chemotherapy literature data from the first half of the 20th century, Marais and his co-workers [12] identified two high-risk periods of childhood for progression to clinically active TB disease following primary infection: infancy (less than 2 years of age) and adolescence (more than 10 years of age).

Although in most pediatric cases (up to 80%), TB presents as pulmonary disease, other parts of the human body, including the skeletal system, can also be affected [6, 15, 16]. Osteoarticular or skeletal TB (i.e., tuberculous involvement of the bones and/or joints; OATB) is more frequent in children than in adults, accounting for approximately 10–35% of pediatric extra-pulmonary TB cases and about 5–7% of all pediatric TB cases [1722]. OATB usually arises secondary to hematogenous seeding of TB bacteria from an often unknown primary site of infection outside the skeleton into the bone and/or synovial tissue during or shortly after the mycobacteremic phase of primary infection or late reactivation of the disease [21, 23, 24]. Less commonly, lymphogenous dissemination, contiguous spread from adjacent structures or direct inoculation of TB bacteria into a skeletal site can also occur [21, 25, 26]. Virtually any bone or joint of the human body can be affected by the disease–the three main forms of OATB are spinal TB (i.e., combination of tuberculous vertebral osteomyelitis and arthritis; ⁓50%), tuberculous osteomyelitis of the extra-spinal bones (⁓11%), and tuberculous arthritis of the extra-spinal joints (⁓30%) [18, 19, 23, 27]. Although the aforementioned forms of OATB are usually present alone, their concomitant occurrence can be observed in some cases [23]. Its relative rarity and highly variable clinical and radiological presentations make pediatric OATB a diagnostic challenge in the modern medical practice [28, 29]. However, early diagnosis is crucial to improve the clinical outcome, as OATB can be a debilitating medical condition with serious and potentially irreversible orthopedic and/or neurologic complications, even many years after the onset of the disease [18, 19, 30, 31].

Recent evolutionary genetics studies on the age of the MTBC by Comas and his co-workers [32] revealed that the human-adapted members of the complex may have co-evolved with their host to successfully infect, cause disease, and transmit over tens of thousands of years [3336]. Besides genetic findings, ancient human skeletons and mummies exhibiting bony changes consistent with OATB [e.g., 3741] also indicate that the disease has afflicted mankind for millennia [34, 35, 42]. Nonetheless, not many cases with OATB in children (less than 15 years of age) have been published in the paleopathological literature [e.g., 4350]. The aforementioned studies reporting archaeological and modern pediatric OATB cases from the pre-antibiotic era have pointed out that the wide variety of manifestations of the disease observed in patients today were present in prehistoric and historic communities [49]. Besides meticulous descriptions from the literature from the first half of the 20th century (pre-chemotherapy era), detailed archaeological case studies also provide a unique insight into the natural history and different presentations of OATB in children. They help us in identifying non-pathognomonic bony changes and/or patterns of lesions that can later be used as diagnostic criteria for OATB in both the modern medical and paleopathological practices. By scrutinizing these new diagnostic criteria in living patients with similar alterations, a more appropriate diagnosis could be established that may contribute to improving the clinical outcome of the disease in those patients. It should be noted that the bony changes observed in archaeological cases may differ from those detectable in living patients, due in part to the introduction of antibiotics in the management of TB from the second half of the 20th century [51]. However, in both developing and developed countries, with the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (in which the applied antibiotic therapy is often not effective enough), presentations of OATB that are similar to those of discovered in archaeological cases from the pre-antibiotic era may become more common in the future. On the other hand, by providing physicians and paleopathologists with a stronger basis for diagnosing different manifestations of OATB, a more sensitive means of assessing the disease frequency in current and archaeological populations can be achieved.

In our paper, we demonstrate a child (i.e., S0603) from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary), who represents a unique case of pediatric OATB with multifocal involvement of the axial skeleton (i.e., spine and ribs) regarding both the pattern and severity of the observed bony changes, as well as the archaeological context.

Materials and methods

Between 2014 and 2015, prior to the construction works of main road #813 bypassing the city of Győr (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, northwestern Hungary), test and preventive excavations were carried out under the direction of Andrea Deák at the merged archaeological sites of Győr–Győrszentiván and Győr–Révhegyi tag, geographically located in close vicinity to the present-day city of Győrszentiván (Fig 1A). Remains of settlements from the Bronze Age, Iron Age, Roman period, and Árpádian Age, as well as of cemeteries from the Roman period and Árpádian Age were also discovered in the large excavation area that coincided with the trail of main road #813.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A) Map of Hungary showing the location of the Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag archaeological site; B) Plan drawing of the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag archaeological site with the location of burial S0603; C) Drawing of the burial of S0603 in situ; and D) Photo of the burial of S0603 in situ.

From the Árpádian Age cemetery of the archaeological site (Fig 1B), a total of 57 burials were unearthed that, based on the grave goods, can clearly be dated to the 11th–12th centuries CE. It should be noted that the Árpádian Age cemetery is only partially excavated, and its exact extent is not known. The 57 burials can be divided into two main groups. The earlier (11th c. CE), western grave group consisted of 11 burials covering a semicircular area of the cemetery, whereas the later (12th c. CE), eastern grave group, which was contiguous with the eastern end of the first one, was comprised of rows of burials. In the uniformly orientated, rectangular pit-graves, the individuals were buried in an extended supine position with the head at the southwestern end of the grave–consistent with the west-east grave orientation typical of Árpádian Age burials. Although the grave of S0603 was in one of the 12th-century-CE grave rows of the cemetery, the body of the deceased was buried in a flexed position, with the opposite orientation to that of the other individuals from the cemetery and without any grave goods (Fig 1B–1D).

Along with the remains of the 56 other individuals, the skeleton of S0603 is temporarily housed at the Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Szeged (Szeged, Hungary). Based on tooth formation and development [52], tooth eruption pattern [53], and diaphyseal length of long tubular bones [54], S0603 was around 12 years of age at the time of death. Both the qualitative and quantitative state of preservation of the child’s skeletal remains are quite good (Fig 2). The skeleton was subject to a detailed macromorphological investigation, focusing on the detection of pathological bony changes. CT imaging of the T1–6 region of the spine was also performed to improve the diagnosis established on the basis of prior macroscopic observations–it was carried out with a Philips Brilliance iCT 256.

Fig 2. The skeleton of S0603.

Fig 2

Ethics statement

Specimen number: S0603.

The skeleton evaluated in the described study is housed in the Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Szeged, in Szeged, Hungary. Access to the specimen was granted by the Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Szeged (Szeged, Hungary) and the Rómer Flóris Museum of Art and History (Győr, Hungary).

No permits were required for the described study, complying with all relevant regulations.

Results

In the 12-year-old child’s skeletal remains, a number of severe pathological bony changes were macroscopically observed, predominantly in the axial skeleton (i.e., spine and ribs).

Skull

In the skull, both parietal bones exhibited signs of cribra cranii in close vicinity to the joining point of the sagittal and lambdoid sutures (Fig 3). On the ectocranial surface of the occipital bone, pitting and slight cortical remodeling were observed on its basal and lateral parts; the pathological process spared the articular surfaces (Fig 4). Similar pitting was detected on the inferior surface of the left temporal pyramid, adjacent to the affected occipital areas (Fig 4).

Fig 3. Signs of cribra cranii on the ectocranial surface of both parietal bones (white arrows).

Fig 3

Fig 4. Pitting and slight cortical remodeling on the ectocranial surface of the occipital and left temporal bones (white arrows).

Fig 4

Spine

In the vertebral column, the C1–5 vertebral bodies showed signs of inflammation in form of pitting and slight cortical remodeling, particularly on their anterior aspect and costal processes (Fig 5). The original height of the C1–5 vertebral bodies was maintained (Fig 5). In the C6–7 vertebral bodies, the pathological process affected not only the cortical bone layers but also the trabeculae: multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions corresponding to round, oval or slightly lobulated necrotizing foci were detected (Fig 6A–6D and 6F). The presence of osteolytic lesions led to considerable bone loss, predominantly in the antero-inferior parts of the C6–7 vertebral bodies; because of the severe bone destruction, they became wedge-shaped (Fig 6E). In the C6–7 vertebral bodies, the pathological process extended towards the transverse processes: pitting and slight cortical remodeling were noted on both sides (Fig 6A, 6C and 6F).

Fig 5. Pitting and slight cortical remodeling on the C1–5 vertebrae (white arrows).

Fig 5

A) Lateral view (right side) and B) Anterior view.

Fig 6. Multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions (white arrows) and consequent severe bone loss in the C6–7 vertebrae.

Fig 6

A) Superior view of C7, B) Inferior view of C7, C) Superior view of C6, D) Inferior view of C6, E) Lateral view of C6–7 (right side), and F) Anterior view of C6–7.

The most severe pathological bony changes were observed in the upper thoracic spine: the development of multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions resulted in almost complete destruction of the T1–5 vertebral bodies with disappearance of the intervening disc spaces and formation of a severe angular kyphosis in the cervicothoracic region of the spine (Fig 7 and S1 Video). Subsequently, the small, wedge-shaped remnants of the T1–5 vertebral bodies fused together. The anterior part of the T6–7 bodies was almost completely destroyed by the pathological process; however, the T5–6 and T6–7 intervening disc spaces and the body height of T6 and T7 were maintained (Fig 7A, 7C and 7D). The posterior part of the T6–7 vertebral bodies was also affected: abnormal porosity, multiple, variable-sized, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions with thin sclerotic margins, pitting, and slight cortical remodeling were detected in their remnants (Fig 7A, 7C and 7D). The upper thoracic vertebral arci and their processes also showed signs of inflammation in form of pitting, slight cortical remodeling, and osteolytic lesions, especially in the T4–7 region (Fig 7A–7C and 7E). Ankylosis of the intervertebral joints and fusion of the laminae were also noted in the upper thoracic spine (T1–6) (Fig 7B, 7E and S1 Video). Furthermore, the CT imaging of the T1–6 region revealed that the vertebral canal was slightly narrowed and altered in shape, especially at the apex of the severe angular kyphosis.

Fig 7. Pott’s gibbus in the T1–7 region.

Fig 7

A) Lateral view (right side), B) Superior view, C) Lateral view (left side), D) Anterior view, and E) Posterior view.

In the lower thoracic (Fig 8A and 8B) and lumbar spine (Fig 9A and 9B), multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions, cortical remodeling, and signs of hypervascularization were recorded on the anterior and lateral aspects of all the preserved vertebral bodies. Moreover, they presented swelling. The lower thoracic and lumbar vertebral arci and their processes also exhibited pitting and slight remodeling of the cortical bone layers (Fig 8C).

Fig 8. Multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions, cortical remodeling, and signs of hypervascularization in the T11–12 vertebrae (white arrows).

Fig 8

A) Lateral view (right side), B) Lateral view (left side), and C) Posterior view.

Fig 9. Multiple, well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions, cortical remodeling, and signs of hypervascularization in the L1–5 vertebrae (white arrows).

Fig 9

A) Lateral view (right side) and B) Lateral view (left side).

Ribs

On both sides of the thoracic wall, almost all the preserved ribs showed pathological bony changes, predominantly on their vertebral end adjacent to the affected thoracic vertebral bodies. The vertebral ends of the first six ribs, especially from the 3rd to the 6th, were supero-inferiorly flattened and thinned, and displayed an abnormal curvature (Fig 10A). An irregular morphology of the articular area was also observed from the 4th to the 6th ribs (especially on the left side) (Fig 10A). From the 7th to the 11th ribs, the vertebral ends presented swelling and pitting (the 12th ribs are missing post-mortem) (Fig 10B). Furthermore, they were supero-inferiorly flattened and their original curvature changed (Fig 10B).

Fig 10.

Fig 10

A) Supero-inferior flattening, thinning, and destructive articular changes (white arrows) and B) swelling and pitting (white rectangle) on the vertebral end of some ribs.

Clavicles

Although the clavicles exhibited no signs of inflammation, similar to the vertebral ends of the ribs, they showed an abnormal curvature on both the sternal and acromial ends (Fig 11).

Fig 11. Abnormal curvature of the clavicles.

Fig 11

Pelvic area

On the right iliac bone, reactive new bone formation covering the whole iliac fossa of the iliac wing was detected (Fig 12). The proximal end of the right femur displayed similar alterations: periosteal new bone formation was noted on its anterior, medial, and posterior surfaces until the level of the lesser trochanter (Fig 13).

Fig 12. Reactive new bone formation on the iliac fossa of the right iliac wing (white arrows).

Fig 12

Fig 13. Reactive new bone formation on the anterior surface of the right femur (proximal end) (white arrows).

Fig 13

Discussion

The numerous pathological alterations (mainly of a lytic nature with very little bone formation), which were observed in the skeletal remains of S0603, indicate that the 12-year-old child suffered from a systemic infectious disease. It affected various regions of the skeleton but the most remarkable bony changes were discovered predominantly in the spine–in form of well-circumscribed osteolytic lesions leading to severe bone loss and collapse and fusion of several adjacent vertebrae. The pathological process terminated in a localized sagittal spinal deformity with a sharp angulation (i.e., sharp, rigid angular kyphosis of the upper thoracic spine). Disruption of the normal curvature of the vertebral column resulted in consequent deformation of the whole thoracic wall: besides the spinal changes, the altered shape of the clavicles and ribs (especially of their vertebral ends) gave the thoracic wall a “rugby-ball-shaped” appearance. The signs of inflammation on the vertebral ends of ribs, as well as of an overlying paravertebral cold abscess in the pelvic area (i.e., new bone formation on the iliac fossa of the right iliac bone and on the proximal end of the right femur) are suggestive of direct extension of the infection from the vertebral column into the adjacent ribs and soft tissues. The overall nature and pattern of the detected bony changes, as well as their resemblance to those of described in previously published archaeological and modern cases from the pre-antibiotic era [e.g., 45, 49, 50, 55, 56] indicate that they are most consistent with pediatric OATB.

In the vast majority of the cases (90–95%), spinal TB–also known as TB spondylitis or Pott’s disease–arises from the anterior subchondral (paradiscal) region of the vertebral body [19, 21, 23, 5759]. This area has a dense end-arteriolar network that makes it susceptible to bacterial seeding via the segmental arterial circulation [21, 23, 57, 59, 60]. Lodgment of TB bacteria into the anterior subchondral region triggers the onset of granulomatous inflammation of the cancellous bone with tubercle formation in the red bone marrow [21, 23, 61]. The development and caseous necrosis of the gradually expanding and coalescing tubercles induce the growth of the initial intra-vertebral abscess and the establishment of additional intra-vertebral abscesses within the affected vertebral body [23, 61, 62]. Furthermore, TB involvement of the segmental artery branches terminating in the anterior subchondral region generates deprivation of the blood supply to the cancellous bone [62]. Any or all of the aforementioned processes result in necrosis and consequent resorption of the bone trabeculae that ultimately lead to the formation of osteolytic lesions in the anterior subchondral region, with subsequent involvement of the entire vertebral body and occasionally of the posterior vertebral elements [23, 30, 57, 59, 60, 62]. As the pathological process progresses, not only the trabeculae but also the cortical bone layers of the affected vertebral body can become destroyed; and thus, the intra-vertebral abscess can extend towards the sub-ligamentous space, the adjoining intervertebral discs or the adjacent soft tissues (e.g., ligaments and muscles) [23, 30, 57, 59, 60].

The anterior longitudinal ligament (i.e., a fibrous structure that covers the anterior and lateral surfaces of the vertebral bodies), at least temporarily, resists the horizontal progression of the infection [62]. Thus, the TB mass extending into the sub-ligamentous space (i.e., an extra-vertebral abscess) can spread only vertically (upwards or downwards) beneath the ligament from the initially affected vertebral body into a similar location at one or more contiguous vertebrae or beyond [62]. The sub-ligamentous extension of the extra-vertebral abscess results in stripping of the periosteum and anterior longitudinal ligament from the anterior and lateral vertebral surfaces [62]. This generates deprivation of the periosteal blood supply to the affected vertebral bodies with consequent ischemia [28, 61, 62]. The combination of pressure and ischemic effects caused by the presence and spread of the extra-vertebral abscess in the sub-ligamentous space results in shallow cortical erosion on the anterior and lateral vertebral surfaces that gives them a scalloped appearance (i.e., anterior gouge defect) [23, 28, 62]. Besides cortical erosion, reactive new bone formation can also occur on the vertebral surfaces underlying the extra-vertebral abscess [23, 63]. As the pathological process progresses, it can involve not only the cortical bone layers of the affected vertebral bodies but also their trabeculae, since avascular vertebrae are more susceptible to infection [28, 63].

Until more advanced stages of spinal TB, the intervertebral disc is relatively spared by the infection–most likely due to the lack of proteolytic enzymes in TB bacteria [18, 19, 23, 58, 59, 61]. However, the progressive destruction of the subchondral region of two adjacent vertebrae can compromise the nutrition of the adjoining intervertebral disc [57]. This can lead to disc degeneration and/or result in disc herniation into the weakened adjoining vertebral bodies, with gradual diminution or eventual loss of the intervening disc space [64]. Degenerated and/or herniated discs are more prone to seeding by TB bacteria from the subchondral cancellous bone either via sub-ligamentous dissemination or contiguous spread; and therefore, to be secondarily involved by the infection [57]. In children, not only the vertebral bodies but also the intervertebral discs can represent the initial site of infection due to their vascularized nature [59, 61, 65].

Extension of the intra-vertebral abscess into the adjacent soft tissues can result in the formation of an extra-vertebral cold abscess (i.e., a slowly progressive abscess without characteristic signs of inflammation (such as heat, erythema or tenderness), which can become encapsulated and calcified over time) [59, 60, 63, 66, 67]. In spinal TB, the development of an extra-vertebral cold abscess is a common complication–it occurs in about two-thirds of the cases [60, 66]. The TB mass can accumulate within the prevertebral and/or paravertebral spaces with the formation of prevertebral or paravertebral cold abscesses that are commonly associated with fistulae [58, 63, 67]. Although the extra-vertebral cold abscess can remain localized at the initial site of infection, in most cases, it extends vertically (usually downwards) beneath the anterior longitudinal ligament or along the fascial planes [63, 67]. In response to an overlying cold abscess, erosive cortical bone destruction and/or reactive new bone formation can occur on the adjacent bone surfaces (e.g., vertebrae, hip bones, and femora) [63].

The weakening of the affected vertebral bodies due to the formation of osteolytic lesions can result in their consequent collapse under the weight of the trunk [23, 62]. This is characterized by a wedge-shaped appearance, since the cavitation affects predominantly the anterior portion of the vertebral body, with intact or less destroyed posterior vertebral elements [62, 63]. Depending on the spinal location, the collapse of one or more contiguous vertebral bodies may lead to the development of different spinal deformities, most frequently of a sharp angular kyphosis in the thoracic spine (i.e., Pott’s gibbus) [57, 60, 63, 67]. The progressive bone destruction and consequent deformity can result in mechanical instability of the spine [59, 60, 66, 67]. To stabilize the vertebral column, subsequent bony fusion of the remnants of the collapsed vertebral bodies and posterior vertebral elements, bony ankylosis of the intervertebral joints, ossification of the intervertebral ligaments, and formation of bony extensions interconnecting the adjacent vertebrae can occur [59, 63].

Although any part of the vertebral column can be affected by TB, the lower thoracic (40–50%) and upper lumbar (35–40%) spine represent the most commonly involved regions in adults [58, 60, 65]. Nonetheless, besides the thoracolumbar junction, the cervicothoracic spine can also become affected quite frequently in children [17, 68, 69]. Spinal TB can be more aggressive and involve more vertebrae in children than in adults; therefore, following vertebral destruction and collapse, they are at particular risk of rapid and severe deformity progression [17, 18, 67, 69, 70]. Moreover, in pediatric spinal TB cases, progression of the deformity even after healing of the disease is not uncommon due to the growing nature of the vertebral column in childhood [31, 57, 65, 67, 71].

In the skeleton of S0603, based on the severity and extent of the observed bony changes, the initial site of TB infection could be the upper thoracic spine (T1–5). From this region, the infection could spread (upwards and downwards) beneath the anterior longitudinal ligament–first to the adjacent cervical and thoracic vertebral bodies (C6–7 and T6–7) and later to all true vertebrae (upwards even to the skull base). In later stages of the disease, not only the spine, but the adjacent ribs and soft tissues (e.g., the iliopsoas muscle) could also become affected by direct extension of the infection. TB involvement of the right iliopsoas muscle could result in the development of a paravertebral cold abscess. Later, the TB mass could extend downwards following the course of the right psoas fascia to its tendinous insertion at the lesser trochanter of the right femur. The 12-year-old child’s case shows a number of similarities to those of previously described in the paleopathological literature [e.g., 45, 49, 50, 55, 56].

Sparacello and his co-workers [49] reported a probable case of pediatric multifocal OATB (i.e., PO21) from Middle Neolithic Italy. Similarities with S0603 include involvement of the spine, ribs, and pelvic area. In the 5-year-old child’s vertebral column, the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions were concomitantly affected; however, in contrast to S0603, only one or two non-contiguous vertebrae were involved in each region, and the spine did not display angular kyphosis. Similar to S0603, bony changes (i.e., pitting, bone resorption with cavitation, and periosteal new bone formation), presumably infectious in nature, were detected in four right-side ribs of PO21; however, they were located not on the vertebral ends but on the sternal ones. Moreover, the shape of the affected ribs was not altered. Although both S0603 and PO21 exhibited signs of an overlying paravertebral cold abscess (i.e., an iliopsoas abscess) in the pelvic area, in P021, the lesions were bilateral and particularly of a lytic/erosive nature. In contrast to S0603, some of the upper limb bones of PO21 (left humerus and right scapula) were also affected by the pathological process.

In a 10-year-old child’s skeleton (i.e., L/74) from Roman period Hungary, Hlavenková and her co-workers [55] identified a number of bony changes that are suggestive of OATB. Similar to S0603, the most remarkable alterations were discovered in the spine and ribs of L/74. In the 10-year-old child’s vertebral column, the sharp angular kyphosis developed in the thoracolumbar region with involvement of five adjacent vertebrae (T9–L1). Due to post-mortem damages, no signs of cortical remodeling or reactive new bone formation could be observed on the affected vertebral bodies; nevertheless, ankylosis of the T11–12 intervertebral joints was noted. In contrast to S0603, the disease affected only one region of the vertebral column (i.e., thoracolumbar region) and no signs of an overlying paravertebral cold abscess could be detected on the skeletal remains of L/74. Although all the preserved ribs of L/74 presented pathological alterations (i.e., slight or moderate periosteal new bone formation on the visceral surface), their appearance was quite different from those of detected in S0603. Only one left-side rib of L/74 showed osteolytic lesions, but not on its vertebral end. In contrast to S0603, some of the lower limb bones of L/74 (right femur and both tibiae) exhibited signs of periostitis on the posterior surface of the shaft.

Another probable case of pediatric OATB from Sarmatian period Hungary was described by Marcsik and Kujáni [56]. Similar to S0603, the cervicothoracic spine of a 5–6-year-old child (i.e., grave no. 178) was affected by the disease–destruction and collapse of the C4–T2 vertebral bodies and subsequent fusion of their remnants resulted in the formation of a Pott’s gibbus. Furthermore, the unequal destruction of the C6–7 vertebral bodies led to scoliosis of the affected spinal region. No other bony changes probably related to TB have been mentioned by the authors.

Matos and his co-workers [45] reported the case of a 12-year-old child (i.e., skeleton no. 8) from medieval Portugal, whose remains exhibited numerous lesions, particularly in the axial skeleton (i.e., spine and ribs), that are consistent with multifocal OATB. Similar to S0603, the most severe alterations were observed in the spine. The T3–7 vertebral bodies were completely destroyed, whereas the T2 and T8–10 vertebral bodies displayed flattening, extensive bone resorption, and cavitation. In the T8–L3 region, the posterior vertebral elements were also involved by TB–they demonstrated pitting and osteolytic lesions. Furthermore, ankylosis of some of the intervertebral joints and ossification of the interspinous ligaments between the T7 and T8 vertebrae were noted. The pathological process terminated in a sharp angular kyphosis of the thoracic spine with moderate scoliosis. Similar to S0603, disruption of the normal curvature of the 12-year-old child’s vertebral column resulted in consequent deformation of the whole thoracic wall–the shape of both clavicles and the 3rd–8th ribs (especially of their vertebral ends) changed. Moreover, direct extension of the infection from the spine to the vertebral end of ribs was also observed in form of destruction, reactive new bone formation, and swelling. In contrast to S0603, no signs of an overlying paravertebral cold abscess could be detected on the remains of skeleton no. 8.

In a 9-year-old child’s remains from the skeletal reference collection of Lisbon (National Museum of Natural History and Science, Lisbon, Portugal), Gooderham and her co-workers [50] observed bony changes presumably resulted from TB involvement of the skeletal system. Similar to S0603, the spine and ribs were most severely affected by the disease. In the T4–12 region, the vertebral bodies exhibited numerous osteolytic lesions that led to considerable bone loss or even complete body destruction (T8–11) with subsequent development of a sharp angular kyphosis and scoliosis. In the same thoracic region, the pathological process extended from the vertebral bodies towards the posterior vertebral elements. Furthermore, the L1–3 vertebral bodies presented swelling. Besides the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, four right-side ribs (8th–12th) and three left-side ribs (7th, 9th, and 10th) were also affected by TB in form of osteolytic lesions on their visceral surface near the vertebral end. In contrast to S0603, no signs of an overlying paravertebral cold abscess could be detected on the skeletal remains of the 9-year-old child. Gooderham and her colleagues [50] noticed that the prolonged disease duration resulted in growth deficit in their case. This could also happen to S0603. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the chronological age of S0603 was higher than the biological one we could estimate based on the observable skeletal remains.

It should be noted that a number of infectious conditions can lead to the development of vertebral osteolytic lesions; and thus, to the destruction of the affected vertebrae with subsequent formation of an abnormal kyphosis in the spine [58]. In the modern medical practice, it can be very difficult to determine, which particular etiology is indicated by the observed bony changes, due in part to the overlap in manifestations of the aforementioned pathological conditions [41, 45, 49]. Nevertheless, in archaeological cases, it can be even more challenging to establish an appropriate diagnosis, as a lot of diagnostic technologies, which can be used to diagnose living patients (e.g., anamnesis, serological testing, and soft tissue analysis), cannot be applied in the paleopathological practice [45]. Although, based on the modern medical and paleopathological literature, pediatric OATB seems to be the most likely underlying cause of the pathological alterations detected in the skeleton of S0603, other infectious etiologies should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. The most relevant ones are granulomatous spinal infections other than TB (fungal infections–e.g., candidiasis, aspergillosis, coccidioidosis, and blastomycosis, and bacterial infections–e.g., actinomycosis and brucellosis) and pyogenic spinal infections [45, 49, 57, 60].

Although in recent years, there has been an increase in incidence of fungal spondylitis, especially in immunocompromised patients, it is still a rare medical condition [7274]. The most frequent fungal granulomatous infections with potential spinal involvement are candidiasis and aspergillosis that can be found throughout the world [73, 74]. Most cases with Candida spondylitis have been reported in adults [75, 76], with the lower thoracic and lumbar spine representing the most commonly affected regions (⁓95%); involvement of the cervical spine seems to be uncommon [7274]. Similar to Candida spondylitis, vertebral osteomyelitis due to Aspergillus species occurs predominantly in the thoracic and lumbar regions; the disease scarcely affects the cervical spine [72, 74, 77, 78]. Both candidiasis and aspergillosis can cause vertebral body destruction and collapse with subsequent kyphosis formation [62]; and therefore, they cannot be completely rejected as diagnostic options in S0603. However, based on their age and localization preference, as well as of their rarity, they seem to be less likely to be responsible for the development of bony changes observed in the spine of S0603.

In contrast to candidiasis and aspergillosis, some fungal granulomatous infections with potential spinal involvement are limited to particular geographic areas of the world–among these diseases, coccidioidosis and blastomycosis are the most common ones [72, 74]. Coccidioidosis is endemic to parts of North, Central, and South America [72, 74, 79, 80], whereas blastomycosis is endemic to North America, but there have been increasing reports of the disease from other parts of the world in the last few decades (e.g., Central and South America, Africa, and Asia) [72, 8183]. If we assume that about one thousand years ago the geographic distribution of coccidioidosis and blastomycosis was similar to that of today, both diseases can be excluded in the differential diagnosis of S0603.

Besides TB, other bacterial granulomatous infections, such as actinomycosis, can cause vertebral osteomyelitis; however, actinomycosis is a rare medical condition, and actinomycotic involvement of the spine is even more uncommon [62, 8487]. Actinomycotic spondylitis occurs mainly in adults, and is usually secondary to direct extension of adjacent soft tissue infection rather than to hematogenous spread of Actinomyces bacteria into the vertebrae [62, 84, 88]. In actinomycotic spondylitis, the cervical and thoracic regions represent the most frequently involved sites, with reactive new bone formation and osteolytic lesions in the affected vertebrae; the intervertebral discs are usually spared [62, 85, 86]. The disease tends to involve the posterior vertebral elements rather than the vertebral bodies–it scarcely results in vertebral body collapse; and thus, consequent kyphosis formation [62, 85]. Based on the above, actinomycosis can be ruled out with high certainty as a diagnostic option in S0603.

Similar to actinomycosis, brucellosis is a bacterial granulomatous infection with worldwide distribution [62, 89, 90]. Brucellar spondylitis, most frequently located in the lumbar region, usually affects adults, particularly in their fifth decade of life [62, 9093]. In brucellar involvement of the spine, destructive and reparative processes occur concurrently, with eventual osteophyte-like reactive new bone formation on the anterior aspect of the affected vertebral bodies [62, 92]. Severe vertebral body destruction and collapse, as well as paravertebral abscess formation are uncommon features in brucellar spondylitis [62, 89, 92, 93]. Therefore, it is unlikely that an infection with Brucella spp. resulted in the development of bony changes discovered in the vertebral column of S0603.

Pyogenic spinal infection is a common cause of vertebral osteomyelitis, especially in adults over 50 years of age [9497]. In most cases with pyogenic spondylitis, the lumbar vertebrae are affected, with typical involvement of two contiguous vertebrae and the adjoining intervertebral disc [9497]. Pyogenic spondylitis usually affects the anterior portion of the vertebral body–destruction of more than half of it, as well as consequent collapse and kyphosis formation are not characteristic features of the disease [95]. Furthermore, in pyogenic spondylitis, involvement of the posterior vertebral elements is relatively rare [97]. Although pyogenic spondylitis cannot be completely excluded in the differential diagnosis of S0603, the overall nature and pattern of the observed bony changes indicate that they are more consistent with pediatric OATB.

Conclusions

Based on the severity and extent of the lesions, as well as on the evidence of secondary healing in the skeleton of S0603, the 12-year-old child suffered from TB for a long time prior to death. In S0603, OATB resulted in severe body deformation and consequent disability in daily activities, which would have required regular and significant care from others to survive. This implies that in the Árpádian Age community of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag, there was a willingness to care for people in need.

From the present-day territory of Hungary, only a few cases with pediatric OATB have been published in the paleopathological literature up to now–one case from the Roman period [55] and two other cases [56] from the Sarmatian period. S0603 is the first reported case from the Árpádian Age. Since children usually acquire TB from an adult contact with clinically active disease, the presence of a childhood OATB case in the Árpádian Age community of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag indicates that other individuals also lived with TB in this historic population. Moreover, different bony changes probably related to TB infection (e.g., signs of rib periostitis, endocranial alterations, vertebral hypervascularization, and diffuse long bone periostitis) were discovered in a number of other sub-adult and adult skeletons from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag, which also imply that TB was endemic in the community–increased population density and unsanitary living conditions could play a crucial role in the transmission of the disease.

Besides meticulous descriptions from the literature from the first half of the 20th century (pre-chemotherapy era), detailed archaeological case studies–like S0603 –can give us a unique insight into the natural history and different presentations of OATB in children. The establishment of a more reliable and accurate TB diagnosis and the assessment of a more relevant TB frequency in past populations require excessive scientific knowledge on the macromorphological diagnostics of TB. Archaeological case studies, like S0603, help us in identifying non-pathognomonic bony changes and/or patterns of lesions that can later be used as macromorphological diagnostic criteria for TB in the paleopathological practice. By providing paleopathologists with a stronger basis for diagnosing TB in ancient human skeletal remains that reveal bony changes resembling that of S0603 or other published archaeological case studies, a more sensitive means of assessing TB frequency in past populations can be achieved.

Supporting information

S1 Video. 3D reconstruction of the severe angular kyphosis (Pott’s gibbus) in the T1–6 region of the spine.

(MP4)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the University of Szeged Open Access Fund (5006) to OS. The National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) (K 125561) and the "Árpád-ház Program" (39509/2018/KFSZ) of the Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities provided funding for GP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Brent AJ. Childhood TB surveillance: Bridging the knowledge gap to inform policy. J Trop Med. 2012;2012: a865436. 10.1155/2012/865436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsai K-S, Chang H-L, Chien S-T, Chen K-L, Chen K-H, Mai M-H, et al. Childhood tuberculosis: Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccination. Pediatr Neonatol. 2013;54(5): 295–302. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hamzaoui A, Yaalaoui S, Cherif FT, Saidi LS, Berraies A. Childhood tuberculosis: A concern of the modern world. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(133): 278–291. 10.1183/09059180.00005314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jenkins HE, Yuen CM, Rodriguez CA, Nathavitharana RR, McLaughlin MM, Donald P, et al. Mortality in children diagnosed with tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(3): 285–295. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30474-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kendall EA. Tuberculosis in children: Under-counted and under-treated. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5(9): e845–e846. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30305-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carvalho ACC, Cardoso CAA, Martire TC, Migliori GB, Sant’Anna CC. Epidemiological aspects, clinical manifestations, and prevention of pediatric tuberculosis from the perspective of the End TB Strategy. J Bras Pneumol. 2018;44(2): 134–144. 10.1590/s1806-37562017000000461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization. TB disease burden. In: Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2019. pp. 27–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoskyns W. Paediatric tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79(931): 272–278. 10.1136/pmj.79.931.272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marais BJ. Childhood tuberculosis: Epidemiology and natural history of disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(3): 321–327. 10.1007/s12098-010-0353-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perez-Velez CM, Marais BJ. Tuberculosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4): 348–361. 10.1056/NEJMra1008049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marais BJ, Schaaf HS. Tuberculosis in children. CSH Perspect Med. 2014;4(9): a017855. 10.1101/cshperspect.a017855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Hesseling AC, Obihara CC, Starke JJ, et al. The natural history of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis: A critical review of literature from the pre-chemotherapy era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(4): 392–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lewinson DA, Lewinson DM. Immunologic susceptibility of young children to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pediatr Res. 2008;63(2): 115. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181652085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Driessche KV, Persson A, Marais BJ, Fink PJ, Urdahl KB. Immune vulnerability of infants to tuberculosis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013: 781320. 10.1155/2013/781320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dawani A, Gupta AK, Jana M. Imaging in pediatric extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86(5): 459–467. 10.1007/s12098-019-02858-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lotfian F, Iotfian G, Bolursaz MR, Tabarsi P, Velayati A. Comparison between pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2017;5(3): e57253. 10.5812/pedinfect.57253 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kiymaz N, Yilmaz N, Demir Ö. Spinal cord compression from spinal tuberculosis in a child. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(3): 180–182. 10.1159/000091864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piccini P, Chiappini E, Tortoli E, de Martino M, Galli L. Clinical peculiarities of tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14: S4. 10.1186/1471-2334-14-S1-S4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kritsaneepaiboon S. Skeletal involvement in pediatric tuberculosis. Radiologic imaging manifestations. TB Corner 2016;2(2): 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Held M, Bruins M-F, Castelein S, Laubscher M, Dunn R, Hoppe S. A neglected infection in literature: Childhood musculoskeletal tuberculosis–A bibliometric analysis of the most influential papers. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017;6(3): 229–238. 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_99_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Procopie I, Popescu EL, Huplea V, Pleşea RM, Ghelase ŞM, Stoica GA, et al. Osteoarticular tuberculosis–Brief review of clinical morphological and therapeutic profiles. Curr Health Sci J. 2017;43(3): 171–190. 10.12865/CHSJ.43.03.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Agarwal A. Paediatric osteoarticular tuberculosis: A review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;11(2): 202–207. 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Teo HEL, Peh WCG. Skeletal tuberculosis in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(11): 853–860. 10.1007/s00247-004-1223-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Spiegel DA, Singh GK, Banskota AK. Tuberculosis of the musculoskeletal system. Tech Orthop. 2005;20(2): 167–178. 10.1097/01.bto.0000167745.24646.dc [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hamijoyo L. Tuberculous arthritis: An overview. Indonesian Journal of Rheumatology 2010;2(2): 10–14. 10.37275/ijr.v2i3.77 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Patel R, Gannamani V, Shay E, Alcid D. Spinal tuberculosis and cold abscess without known primary disease: Case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2016. 10.1155/2016/1780153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carender CN, Akoh CC, Kowalski HR. Mycobacterium tuberculosis monoarthritis of the knee in children: A case report. Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38: 17–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kalane UD, Kulkarni S. Spinal tuberculosis in young children: Is it really unusual presentation in endemic countries like India?. J Pediatr Neurol. 2011;9(1): 69–73. 10.3233/JPN20100444 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Durán PMJ, Sanz-Gadea MB, Raves RT, Peña MMJ, Baquero-Artigao F. Osteoarticular tuberculosis in paediatrics: A review of 20 years of cases in a tertiary hospital. An Pediatr. 2017;87(5): 291–292. 10.1016/j.anpede.2017.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seddon JA, Donald PR, Vlok GJ, Schaaf HS. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis of the spine in children–Characteristics from a high burden setting. J Trop Pediatr. 2012;58(5): 341–347. 10.1093/tropej/fmr104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moon M-S, Kim S-J, Kim M-S, Kim D-S. Most reliable time in predicting residual kyphosis and stability: Pediatric spinal tuberculosis. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(6): 1069–1077. 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Comas I, Coscolla M, Luo T, Borrell S, Holt KE, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10): 1176–1182. 10.1038/ng.2744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bañuls A-L, Sanou A, Nguyen TVA, Godreuil S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Ecology and evolution of a human bacterium. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(11): 1261–1269. 10.1099/jmm.0.000171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brites D, Gagneux S. Co-evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Homo sapiens. Immunol Rev. 2015;264(1): 6–24. 10.1111/imr.12264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ecology Gagneux S. and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(4): 202–213. 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Buzic I, Giuffra V. The paleopathological evidence on the origins of human tuberculosis: A review. J Prev Med Hyg. 2020;61(Suppl. 1): e3–e38. 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.1s1.1379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nerlich AG, Haas CJ, Zink A, Szeimies U, Hagedorn HG. Molecular evidence for tuberculosis in an ancient Egyptian mummy. Lancet 1997;350(9088): 1404. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65185-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Suzuki T, Inoue T. Earliest evidence of spinal tuberculosis from the Aneolithic Yayoi period in Japan. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2007;17(4): 392–402. 10.1002/oa.871 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Köhler K, Pálfi Gy, Molnár E, Zalai-Gaál I, Osztás A, Bánffy E, et al. A late Neolithic case of Pott’s disease from Hungary. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2014;24(6): 697–703. 10.1002/oa.2254 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baker O, Lee OY-C, Wu HHT, Besra GS, Minnikin DE, Llewellyn G, et al. Human tuberculosis predates domestication in ancient Syria. Tuberculosis 2015;95(Suppl. 1): S4–S12. 10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Okazaki K, Takamuku H, Yonemoto S, Itahashi Y, Gakuhari T, Yoneda M, et al. A paleopathological approach to early human adaptation for wet-rice agriculture: The first case of Neolithic spinal tuberculosis at the Yangtze River Delta of China. Int J Paleopathol. 2019;24: 236–244. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Human Perrin P. and tuberculosis co-evolution: An integrative view. Tuberculosis 2015;95(Suppl. 1): S112–S116. 10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dabernat H, Crubézy É. Multiple bone tuberculosis in a child from pre-dynastic Upper Egypt (3200 BC). Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2010;20(6): 719–730. 10.1002/oa.1082 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Klaus HD, Wilbur AK, Temple DH, Buikstra JE, Stone AC, Fernandez M, et al. Tuberculosis on the north coast of Peru: Skeletal and molecular paleopathology of late pre-Hispanic and postcontact mycobacterial disease. J Archaeol Sci. 2010;37(10): 2587–2597. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matos V, Marques C, Lopes C. Severe vertebral collapse in a juvenile from the graveyard (13th/14th–19th centuries) of the São Miguel Church (Castelo Branco, Portugal): Differential palaeopathological diagnosis. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2011;21(2): 208–217. 10.1002/oa.1125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dawson H, Brown KR. Childhood tuberculosis: A probable case from late medieval Somerset, England. Int J Paleopathol. 2012;2(1): 31–35. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Colombo A, Saint-Pierre C, Naji S, Panuel M, Coqueugniot H, Dutour O. Langerhans cell histiocystosis or tuberculosis on a medieval child (Oppidum de la Granède, Millau, France– 10th–11th centuries AD). Tuberculosis 2015;95(Suppl. 1): S42–S50. 10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cieślik AI. Evidence of tuberculosis among children in medieval (13th–15th century) Wrocław: A case study of hip joint tuberculosis in a juvenile skeleton excavated from the crypt of the St. Elizabeth church. Anthropol Rev. 2017;80(2): 219–231. 10.1515/anre-2017-0014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sparacello VS, Roberts CA, Kerudin A, Müller R. A 6500-year-old Middle Neolithic child from Pollera Cave (Liguria, Italy) with probable multifocal osteoarticular tuberculosis. Int J Paleopathol. 2017;17: 67–74. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2017.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gooderham E, Marinho L, Spake L, Fisk S, Prates C, Sousa S, et al. Severe skeletal lesions, osteopenia and growth deficit in a child with pulmonary tuberculosis (mid-20th century, Portugal). Int J Paleopathol. 2020;30: 47–56. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2020.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Holloway KL, Link K, Rühli F, Henneberg M. Skeletal lesions in human tuberculosis may sometimes heal: An aid to palaeopathological diagnoses. PLOS ONE 2013;8(4): e62798. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schour I, Massler M. The development of the human dentition. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941;28: 1153–1160. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ubelaker DH. Human skeletal remains: Excavation, analysis, interpretation. Washington, DC, USA: Taraxacum. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stloukal M, Hanâkovâ H. Die Länge der Längsknochen altslawischer Bevölkerungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Wachstumsfragen. HOMO 1978;29(1): 53–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hlavenková L, Teasdale MD, Gábor O, Nagy G, Beňuš R, Marcsik A, et al. Childhood bone tuberculosis from Roman Pécs, Hungary. HOMO 2015;66(1): 27–37. 10.1016/j.jchb.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marcsik A, Kujáni I. Analysis of Sarmatian period human’s skeletal remains at Apátfalva-Nagyút-dűlő lelőhely (M43 site 43). In: Bárkányi I, F. Lajkó O, editors. Yearbook of the Móra Ferenc Museum. Szeged, Hungary: Móra Ferenc Museum; 2015. pp. 139–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Agrawal A, Timothy J, Shetty MS, Shetty L, Shetty JP. Paediatric perspective of spinal tuberculosis. Paediatr Today 2006;9(1): 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Acharya J, Gibbs WN. Imaging spinal infection. Radiol Infect Dis. 2016;3(2): 84–91. 10.1016/j.jrid.2016.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Esteves S, Catarino I, Lopes D, Sousa C. Spinal tuberculosis: Rethinking an old disease. J Spine 2017;6(1): 358. 10.4172/2165-7939.1000358 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: A review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(5): 440–454. 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Onuminya JE, Morgan E, Shobode MA. Spinal tuberculosis–Current management approach. Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma 2019;18(2): 35–43. 10.4103/njot.njot_25_19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aufderheide AC, Rodríguez-Martín C. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 118–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ortner DJ. Infectious diseases: Tuberculosis and leprosy. In: Ortner DJ, editor. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 227–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Palmer PES. Tuberculosis of bone. In: The imaging of tuberculosis: With epidemiological, pathological, and clinical correlation. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2002. pp. 84–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rasouli MR, Mirkoohi M, Vaccaro AR, Yarandi KK, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Spinal tuberculosis: Diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J. 2012;6(4): 294–308. 10.4184/asj.2012.6.4.294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Batirel A, Erdem H, Sengoz G, Pehlivanoglu F, Ramosaco E, Gülsün S, et al. The course of spinal tuberculosis (Pott disease): Results of the multinational, multicentre Backbone-2 study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(11): 1008e9–1008e18. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rajasekaran S, Soundararajan DC, Shetty AP, Kanna RM. Spinal tuberculosis: Current concepts. Global Spine J. 2018;8(Suppl. 4): S96–S108. 10.1177/2192568218769053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tuli SM, Srivastava TP, Varma BP, Sinha GP. Tuberculosis of spine. Acta Orthop Scand. 1967;38(1–4): 445–458. 10.3109/17453676708989653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xing X, Yuan H. Imaging and differential diagnosis of pediatric spinal tuberculosis. Radiol Infect Dis. 2015;1(2): 78–82. 10.1016/j.jrid.2015.02.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang HQ, Wang Y-X, Guo C, Zhao D, Deng A, Wu J-H, et al. One-stage posterior focus debridement, fusion, and instrumentation in the surgical treatment of cervicothoracic spinal tuberculosis with kyphosis in children: A preliminary report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(5): 735–742. 10.1007/s00381-010-1319-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pandita A, Madhuripan N, Pandita S, Hurtado R. Challenges and controversies in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. J Clin Tuberc Other Mcobact Dis. 2020;19: 100151. 10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kim CW, Perry A, Currier B, Yaszemski M, Garfin SR. Fungal infections of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444: 92–99. 10.1097/01.blo.0000203451.36522.4c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lee S-W, Lee SH, Chung HW, Kim MJ, Seo MJ, Shin MJ. Candida spondylitis: Comparison of MRI findings with bacterial and tuberculous cases. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(4): 872–877. 10.2214/AJR.12.10344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Caldera G, Cahueque M, Cobar A, Gómez G, Rodríguez O. Fungal spondylodiscitis: Review. J Spine 2016;5(2): 1000302. 10.4172/2165-7939.1000302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Huang A, Huang C, Kugathasan S. Vertebral osteomyelitis due to Candida parapsilosis in a child with Chron disease while receiving anti-TNF therapy. J Pediatr Gastr Nutr. 2013;56(4): e23–e26. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31827ecbda [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Storm L, Lausch KR, Arendrup MC, Mortensen KL, Petersen E. Vertebral infection with Candida albicans failing caspofungin and fluconazole combination therapy but successfully treated with high dose liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2014;6: 6–9. 10.1016/j.mmcr.2014.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Oh I-S, Seo J-Y, Ha K-Y, Kim Y-C. Treatment for multiple Aspergillus spondylitis including a hip joint. Asian Spine J. 2009;3(2): 106–112. 10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dai G, Wang T, Yin C, Sun Y, Xu D, Wang Z, et al. Aspergillus spondylitis: Case series and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21: 572. 10.1186/s12891-020-03582-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gorris ME, Treseder KK, Zender CS, Randerson JT. Expansion of coccidioidomycosis endemic regions in the United States in response to climate change. GeoHealth 2019;3(10): 308–327. 10.1029/2019GH000209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kollath DR, Miller KJ, Barker BM. The mysterious desert dwellers: Coccidioides immitis and Coccidioides posadasii, causative fungal agents of coccidioidomycosis. Virulence 2019;10(1): 222–233. 10.1080/21505594.2019.1589363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Codifava M, Guerra A, Rossi G, Paolucci P, Iughetti L. Unusual osseous presentation of blastomycosis in an immigrant child: A challenge for European pediatricians. Ital J Pediatr. 2012;38: 69. 10.1186/1824-7288-38-69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.McBride JA, Gauthier GM, Klein BS. Clinical manifestations and treatment of blastomycosis. Clin Chest Med. 2017;38(3): 435–449. 10.1016/j.ccm.2017.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Vyas KS, Bradsher RW. Blastomycosis. In: Ryan ET, Hill DR, Solomon T, Aronson NE, Endy TP, editors. Hunter’s tropical medicine and emerging infectious diseases. (E-Book). Elsevier; 2020. pp. 671–673. 10.1016/C2016-0-01879-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Honda H, Bankowski MJ, Kajioka EHN, Chokrungvaranon N, Kim W, Gallacher ST. Thoracic vertebral actinomycosis: Actinomyces israelii and Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(6): 2009–2014. 10.1128/JCM.01706-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Duvignaud A, Ribeiro E, Moynet D, Longy-Boursier M, Malvy D. Cervical spondylitis and spinal abscess due to Actinomyces meyeri. Braz J Infect Dis. 2014;18(1): 106–109. 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Patil VR, Joshi AR, Joshi SS, Patel D. Lumbosacral actinomycosis in an immunocompetent individual: An extremely rare case. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2014;5(4): 173–175. 10.4103/0974-8237.147088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ronceray L, Friesenbichler W, Hutter C, Lakatos K, Krizmanich W, Amann G, et al. Thoracic actinomycosis with infiltration of the spine: An oncological pitfall. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(6): 468–471. 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yamada Y, Kinoshita C, Nakagawa H. Lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis and psoas abscess caused by Actinomyces israelii after an operation under general anesthesia in a patient with end-stage renal disease: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2019;13: 351. 10.1186/s13256-019-2261-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li T, Li W, Du Y, Gao M, Liu X, Wang G, et al. Discrimination of pyogenic spondylitis from brucellar spondylitis on MRI. Medicine 2018;97(26): e11195. 10.1097/MD.0000000000011195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Zhao C. Cervical brucellar spondylitis causing incomplete limb paralysis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52: e20180243. 10.1590/0037-8682-0243-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bodur H, Erbay A, Çolpan A, Akinci E. Brucellar spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2004;24(4): 221–226. 10.1007/s00296-003-0350-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ranjbar M, Turgut AT, Nojomi M, Turgut M. Brucellar spondylitis as a complication of brucellosis. In: Turgut M, Haddad FS, de Divitiis O, editors. Neurobrucellosis. Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. pp. 89–98. 10.1007/978-3-319-24639-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Shen L, Jiang C, Jiang R, Fang W, Feng Q, Wang L, et al. Diagnosis and classification in MRI of brucellar spondylitis. Radiol Infect Dis. 2017;4(3): 102–107. 10.1016/j.jrid.2017.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cheung WY, Luk KDK. Pyogenic spondylitis. Int Orthop. 2012;36(2): 397–404. 10.1007/s00264-011-1384-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee KY. Comparison of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(2): 216–223. 10.4184/asj.2014.8.2.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nickerson EK, Sinha R. Vertebral osteomyelitis in adults: An update. Br Med Bull. 2016;117(1): 121–138. 10.1093/bmb/ldw003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sato K, Yamada K, Yokosuka K, Yoshida T, Goto M, Matsubara T, et al. Pyogenic spondylitis: Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment. Kurume Med J. 2019;65(3): 83–89. 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS653001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mark Spigelman

1 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-32041

An astonishing case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr.Spakker,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 15 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mark Spigelman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Dr Spekker

Your paper has been reviewed by 3 highly qualified reviewers all of whom agree it is worthy of publication. however they have suggested some minor changes that will help to tighten the paper please address these and revert back to me.

Prof Mark Spigelman

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a really elegant little case study of a child with probable osteoarticular tuberculosis from medieval Hungary. It is very well written (with a few minor grammatical errors), methodologically sound, and will make a useful contribution to the paleopathological literature on this disease. The detail in which the authors describe the skeletal changes of this disease and the way in which they link the underlying pathophysiology of TB to the specific lesions exhibited by S0603 is exceptionally good – I’d like to see more of this in paleopathological publications! My comments, outlined below, are minor.

Title: This is a personal preference but I would perhaps avoid the term “astonishing”. As the authors acknowledge in the text, there have been other bioarchaeological cases of pediatric OATB with skeletal changes as dramatic as those in S0603.

p. 2, lines 26-27: I’m not sure I would agree that pediatric OATB cases have “scarcely” been described in the bioarchaeological literature and the authors actually spend a considerable amount of time on similar published cases in the discussion.

p. 2, lines 31-33: again, I probably wouldn’t describe the vertebral changes as “remarkable”. The changes exhibited (vertebral collapse secondary to lytic activity) are pretty classic and this is certainly not the only child from the bioarchaeological record who exhibits Potts disease.

p. 2, line 30 “could HAVE/MAY HAVE suffered”

p. 2, lines 44-46: this reasoning seems a bit circular. Paleopathological cases of TB provide a stronger basis for diagnosing paleopathological cases of TB?

p. 4, line 73: minor, but I would add chronological age ranges to “infancy” and “adolescence”.

p. 4, lines 79-80: the primary site of TB infection is always the lungs, except in cases of M. bovis which can begin infection in the gut. I think you mean that it disseminates from another secondary site?

p. 4, lines 90-91: “..early diagnosis IS crucial..”

p. 5, lines 106-111: Again, I think your reasoning is a bit circular here and I’m not sure I’m convinced that paleopathological case studies of very extreme skeletal chances will aid clinicians in making an earlier diagnosis. I understand wanting to make this work clinically relevant but this seems a bit of a stretch.

p. 5, lines 114-116: “..can become more common in the future”. This sentence is a bit awkward. Do you mean that MDRTB is more likely to result in skeletal involvement? If so, do you have a reference for this?

p. 5-6, lines 121-122: is this case really very unique? You describe similar cases of pediatric OATB in the discussion. I think you need stronger justification for why the case you are reporting is different.

p. 7, line 154: I would use the term “skeletal remains” instead of “bone remains” (here and elsewhere in the manuscript.

p. 8, line 181: Define the term “cribra cranii”. Also can you tell whether this is porous new bone, cortical porosity, or trabecular expansion? These distinctions are important for differential diagnosis. The term cribra cranii isn't really used much anymore because it's very non-specific.

p. 9, line 197: I would use the term “trabeculae” or “cancellous bone” instead “spongy material”.

p. 9, line 201: “IN the C6-7 vertebral bodies..”.

p. 10, lines 233-234: “Moreover, they presented swelling.” What does swelling mean? I would describe the changes in terms of the underlying cellular process. E.g. Is this change caused by chronic apposition of subperiosteal new bone?

p. 11, line 251: “..the 12th ribs are post-mortem missing..” this should be “missing post-mortem”

p. 11, line 264: ..”covering the whole pelvic surface”. Pelvic surface doesn’t make much sense anatomically since the whole ilium is part of the pelvis. Maybe interior or medial surface would be better?

p. 12, line 285: “..paravertebral abscess in the pelvic area”. I would tie this back to your lesion descriptions and explain why you think there is a paravertebral abscess (i.e. new bone on the interior ilium and proximal femur). Show your line of reasoning for the reader.

p. 12, line 291: “..Pott’s disease ARISE”

p. 14, lines 323-4: Again, I would avoid “spongy material” and say “trabeculae” or “cancellous bone”.

p. 15, line 362: My understanding is that the term thoracolumbar junction only refers to the articulation between T12 and L1.

p. 21, line 511: “could HAVE sufferED from..”

p. 21, lines 513-516: this information about the case described by Goodman et al and its implications for age estimation probably belongs in the discussion rather than the conclusion.

p. 21, line 517: “..which WOULD HAVE required..”

p. 22, line 518: “THIS implies that in the..”

Figures: I think these would benefit from arrows indicating regions of pathological activity. Otherwise they are very good!

Reviewer #2: The manuscript describes, in detail and at length, an unusual case of childhood tuberculous spondylitis from the Middle Ages. It is of interest but would benefit from more rigour and brevity when describing the pathology. I have annotated the text, suggesting some typographical and other changes.

Reviewer #3: The MS titled "An astonishing case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)." is a well written, nicely documented MS, showing a rare case of childhood disease. It presents an essential paleopathological case. The method used is proper.

The illustrations help to understand the message. The only suggestion is to change Figure 1/C with a better quality drawing. It is clear that Fig. 1/C shows the original document made during excavation, but a redrawing would it more elegant and improve the quality of the MS. The Hungarian text of the picture ought to be changed into English as well.

In sum, this case study of exhibiting bony changes consistent with osteoarticular tuberculosis is good work and fits well with the aim and scope of the PLOSOne.

Accepting and publishing the article is suggested.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Helen D. Donoghue

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-32041r.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249939.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Mar 2021

Dear Professor Mark Spigelman,

I am very thankful for the reviewers’ insightful and constructive comments regarding our manuscript entitled “An astonishing case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)” that was submitted to PLOS ONE (manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-32041). I am sure that the reviewers helped us to improve the quality of our manuscript. The main text and several figures have been modified following the reviewers’ suggestions, and the revised files have been uploaded to the submission site of PLOS ONE.

Responses to the suggestions:

1) Reviewer 1 mentioned that in the title, we should avoid the term “astonishing”.” In Reviewer 2’s opinion, we should use the term “unusual” instead of “astonishing”. Following the reviewers’ advice, “astonishing” was changed to “unusual” in the title of our manuscript.

2) Reviewer 1 noted (regarding page 2, lines 26–27) that “I’m not sure I would agree that pediatric OATB cases have “scarcely” been described in the bioarchaeological literature and the authors actually spend a considerable amount of time on similar published cases in the discussion”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that other pediatric OATB cases have also been described in the paleopathological literature, so our case should definitely not be considered as the only one of its kind. However, in our opinion, the number of published pediatric OATB cases, especially in comparison with adult OATB cases, is still low in the paleopathological literature – from Hungary, only three cases have been published up to now. To approximate opinions, we modified the text in the “Abstract” and “Introduction” parts of our manuscript: “not many pediatric OATB cases have been scarcely published in the paleopathological literature”. We hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with the modifications we made.

3) Following Reviewer 2’s suggestion, “i.e.,” was deleted in page 2, line 27.

4) Reviewer 1 commented (regarding page 2, lines 31–33) that we should not describe the vertebral changes observed in our case as “remarkable”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that our case is “certainly not the only child from the bioarchaeological record who exhibits Potts disease”. However, in our opinion, the severity, extent, and pattern of the detected bony changes make our case remarkable – it can be considered as some kind of a “mixture” of the previously published cases. To approximate opinions, “remarkable” was changed to “serious” in the “Abstract” part of our manuscript.

5) Reviewer 1 noted that in page 2, line 30, “could suffer” should be changed to “could have suffered” – unfortunately, we could not find this phrase in the line mentioned above; nevertheless, we think that very likely, we should change “could suffer” to “could have suffered” in page 2, line 39. Reviewer 2 mentioned that our manuscript “would benefit from more rigour and brevity when describing the pathology”. Reviewer 2 suggested that in page 2, line 39, “could suffer” should be changed to “suffered”. Furthermore, Reviewer 2 commented (regarding page 2, line 41) that “could require” should be changed to “would require” and “amount of” should be deleted. To execute the reviewers’ aforementioned suggestions, “could suffer” was changed to “suffered”, “could require” was changed to “would have required”, and “amount of” was deleted. Reviewer 2 also noted (regarding page 2, line 40) that “resulted” should be changed to “results”. In our opinion, modifying our sentence this way would change its meaning – in this sentence, we discussed about our case rather than about OATB cases in general. Therefore, if Reviewer 2 agrees, we would not like to change “resulted” to “results”.

6) Reviewer 1 mentioned (regarding page 44–46) that “… this reasoning seems a bit circular. ”Paleopathological cases of TB provide stronger basis for diagnosing paleopathological cases of TB?”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that in the “Abstract”, our reasoning can seem a bit circular – unfortunately, because of the word limit of the “Abstract” (max. 300 words), we cannot discuss it in more detail in that part of the manuscript. Nevertheless, the “Conclusions” part of our manuscript was supplemented to further highlight this aspect. We hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with this modification and will not find our reasoning circular anymore.

7) Reviewer 2 suggested that in the first paragraph of the “Introduction”, “to this aspect” (page 3, line 50), “on the one hand” (page 3, line 51), and “on the other hand” (page 3, line 54) should be deleted, and a comma should be inserted after “reactivation” (page 3, line 55) – we modified the text accordingly. Reviewer 2 also mentioned that “on the other hand” (page 3, line 51) should be changed to “however”. In our opinion, modifying our sentence this way would change its meaning – it would imply that there is some kind of contrast between this sentence and the previous one, which is not true. Therefore, if Reviewer 2 agrees, we would not like to insert “however”.

8) Following Reviewer 1’s advice (regarding page 4, line 73), chronological age ranges were added to “infancy” and “adolescence”.

9) Reviewer 1 noted (regarding page 4, lines 79–80) that “the primary site of TB infection is always the lungs, except in cases of M. bovis which can begin infection in the gut. I think you mean that it disseminates from another secondary site?”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that TB primarily affects the lungs, and the hematogenous or lymphogenous dissemination of TB bacteria to other parts of the body, including the skeleton, can result in the development of extra-pulmonary TB forms, such as OATB. However, as we already tried to highlight in the “Introduction” part (page 4, lines 78–83 in the original manuscript), OATB can also result from contiguous spread from adjacent structures (e.g., the infection can spread from the affected meninges to the adjacent cranial bones) or from direct inoculation of TB bacteria into a skeletal site (e.g., as a result of a trauma or a surgical intervention). Therefore, even if only in the minority of OATB cases, besides the lungs, other parts of the body (e.g., the gastrointestinal tract) can be “primary sites” from where TB infection can spread to the bones, or even the bones can represent the primary site of infection.

10) Reviewer 2 suggested that in page 4, “with” (line 78) should be deleted and “for” (line 96) should be changed to “over”. Furthermore, Reviewer 1 noted that in page 4, “would be” (lines 90–91) should be changed to “is” – we modified the text accordingly.

11) Reviewer 1 mentioned (regarding page 5, lines 106–111) that our reasoning seems to be a bit circular. As we already noted above, to execute Reviewer 1’s comment, the “Conclusions” part of our manuscript was supplemented. Again, we hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with the modifications we made. Reviewer 1 also mentioned that “I’m not sure I’m convinced that paleopathological case studies of very extreme skeletal changes will aid clinicians in making an earlier diagnosis. I understand wanting to make this work clinically relevant but this seems a bit of a stretch.” We agree with Reviewer 1 that the results demonstrated in our current manuscript are more relevant for paleopathologists than for physicians, and that the way we phrased our sentence in the original manuscript may seem a bit of a stretch. Therefore, the sentence was rephrased – we hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with the modifications.

12) Reviewer 2 suggested that in page 5, “could already be” (line 103) should be changed to “were already” and “can” should be changed to “may” (line 116). Moreover, Reviewer 2 noted that in page 5, “evidently,” (line 102), “can” (line 105), “on the one hand” (line 109), and “of” (line 112) should be deleted. Following Reviewer 2’s corrections, we modified the text.

13) Reviewer 1 noted (regarding page 5, lines 114–116) that our “sentence is a bit awkward. Do you mean that MDRTB is more likely to result in skeletal involvement?”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that the way we phrased our sentence can be a little confusing – we did not mean that MDR-TB is more likely to result in skeletal involvement. What we meant is that because the anti-tuberculous drug therapy is not effective enough in a number of MDR-OATB cases, the presentation of the disease can become similar to those of discovered in archaeological cases where no antibiotics could be used to treat TB. Since today MDR-TB becomes more and more common, it can be expected, at least in our opinion, that the “pre-antibiotic-era-like” presentations of OATB will be observed more frequently, as well. To avoid confusion, the sentence was modified – we hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with it.

14) Reviewer 1 asked us if “is this case really very unique?” (pages 5–6, lines 121–122). We agree with Reviewer 1 that in our manuscript, we “describe similar cases of pediatric OATB in the discussion”. Actually, one of the main aims of our study was to compare our case to previously published ones; and thus, highlight its uniqueness. As it was discussed in detail in the “Discussion” part, S0603 shares some similarities with previously published cases – it can be considered as some kind of a “mixture” of them. However, regarding the severity, extent, and pattern of the observed lesions, there are some differences between S0603 and the previously published cases – in our opinion, besides its archaeological context, that is what makes S0603 unique and worth for publishing. We think that not only our case but every archaeological OATB case can give us a unique insight into the natural history and different presentations of the disease (very likely, there are no two cases that are completely identical in every aspect (e.g., severity, extent, and pattern of lesions)).

15) Reviewer 2 suggested that in the “Materials and Methods” part, “extant” should be corrected to “extent” (page 6, line 144), “it is” (page 7, line 149) and “placed” (page 7, line 150) should be deleted, and “is” should be changed to “was” (page 7, line 170). Reviewer 1 mentioned that we should use the term “skeletal remains” instead of “bone remains” in page 7, line 154 and elsewhere in the manuscript (page 7, line 159; page 8, line 177; page 12, line 275; page 17, line 399; page 18, line 440; page 21, lines 515–516; and page 22, line 534). Following the reviewers’ comments, the text was modified. (It should be mentioned that in some sentences (page 7, line 154; page 17, line 413; page 18, line 427; and page 18, line 428), to avoid word repetition, “bone” was deleted before “remains” but “skeletal” was not inserted instead of “bone”.)

16) Reviewer 1 asked us to define the term “cribra cranii”. Furthermore, Reviewer 1 asked us to “tell whether this is porous new bone, cortical porosity, or trabecular expansion?”. Stravopodi et al. (2009) defined cribra cranii “as an osseous disorder manifested as pitting and/or porosis on the cranial vault” – in our manuscript, we used the same definition for cribra cranii. Based on the macromorphological appearance of the lesions observed on the ectocranial surface of the two parietal bones of S0603, they are very likely trabecular expansions. Although in several studies (Masson et al., 2013; Kyselicová et al., 2016), cribra cranii was associated with TB (and a number of other conditions), the exact etiology of cribra cranii is still unknown and should be further investigated (Rivera & Lahr, 2017). In the “Results” part of our manuscript, we wanted to mention all pathological alterations that were noted in the skeleton of S0603; nevertheless, in the “Discussion” part, only those lesions were discussed in detail that can be associated with TB with high certainty. Thus, cribra cranii was left out from the “Discussion” part.

17) Reviewer 1 mentioned (regarding page 9, line 197 and page 14, lines 323–324) that we should use “trabeculae” or “cancellous bone” instead of “spongy material”. Following Reviewer 1’s suggestion, “spongy material” was changed to “trabeculae” (page 9, line 197; page 13, line 305; and page 14, lines 323–324) or “cancellous bone” (page 13, line 295; page 13, line 300; and page 14, lines 331–332) throughout the text.

18) Reviewer 1 noted that “from” should be changed to “in” in page 9, line 201 and “post-mortem missing” should be changed to “missing post-mortem” in page 11, line 251 – we modified the text accordingly.

19) Reviewer 1 asked us (regarding page 10, lines 233–234) “What does swelling mean?”. Reviewer 1 suggested that we should “describe the changes in terms of the underlying cellular process”. In our case, swelling means that besides osteolytic lesions, cortical remodeling, and signs of hypervascularization, the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies revealed slight expansion (ballooning) – especially supero-inferiorly. Although ballooning of the vertebral bodies was noted in archaeological and modern spinal TB cases (especially in the central type of the disease) (Matos et al., 2011; Esteves et al., 2017), in children, the vertebral endplates often have an outward convex appearance, progressing to concave during growth (Jaremko et al., 2015; Louie et al., 2018). Therefore, it cannot be excluded, that the slight expansion observed in our case was actually a “normal variant” – considering that S0603 suffered from TB for a long time, it cannot be excluded that the disease negatively affected the growth and development of the child’s vertebrae; and thus, the progression of the vertebral endplates from convex to concave was hindered. Although in the “Results” part of our manuscript, we wanted to mention all pathological alterations that were noted in the skeleton of S0603, in the “Discussion” part, only those lesions were discussed in detail that can be associated with TB with high certainty. Thus, swelling of the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae was left out from the “Discussion” part.

20) Reviewer 1 mentioned (regarding page 11, line 264) that “pelvic surface doesn’t make much sense anatomically”; and therefore, we should use a better term. Following Reviewer 1’s suggestion, “pelvic surface” was changed to “iliac fossa” in page 11, line 264 and in the figure legend of Figure 12.

21) Reviewer 1 noted (regarding page 12, line 285) that we should tie back the description of the signs of a paravertebral abscess in the pelvic area to our lesion descriptions and explain why we think there is a paravertebral abscess. Following Reviewer 1’s suggestion, we tried to modify the text accordingly – we hope that Reviewer 1 will be satisfied with the modifications we made.

22) Reviewer 1 suggested (regarding page 12, line 291) that “arises” should be changed to “arise”. In our opinion, ‘arises” is correct, since following “spinal TB”, we should use the verb (i.e., arise) in its singular form; therefore, we did not change “arises” to “arise”. We hope that Reviewer 1 will agree with us.

23) Reviewer 1 noted that “My understanding is that the term thoracolumbar junction only refers to the articulation between T12 and L1.”. We agree with Reviewer 1 that in some studies, the thoracolumbar junction is restricted to the T12–L1 region of the spine. However, in other studies its definition is wider – e.g., T10–L2 region (Rajasekaran et al., 2015) or T11–L2 region (Litré et al., 2013). In our manuscript, we considered the wider definition of the thoracolumbar junction. To avoid confusion or misunderstanding, “thoracolumbar junction” was changed to “thoracolumbar region” in page 17, lines 394 and 398.

24) Reviewer 2 mentioned (regarding page 21, line 496) that “Brucella bacteria” should be changed to “Brucella spp.” – we modified the text accordingly.

25) Reviewer 1 noted that in page 21, line 511, “could suffer” should be changed to “could have suffered”. Reviewer 2 mentioned that our manuscript “would benefit from more rigour and brevity when describing the pathology”. Reviewer 2 suggested that in page 21, line 511, “could suffer” should be changed to “suffered”. To execute the reviewers’ aforementioned suggestions, “could suffer” was changed to “suffered”.

26) Reviewer 1 mentioned (regarding page 21, lines 513–516) that “the information about the case described by Goodman et al and its implications for age estimation probably belongs in the discussion rather than the conclusions”. Following Reviewer 1’s advice, this part was moved to the “Discussion” part and was rephrased and supplemented to fit better in its new place.

27) Reviewer 1 suggested (regarding page 21, line 517) that “could require” should be changed to “would have required”. The same sentence can be found in the “Abstract” part of our manuscript, where Reviewer 2 noted that “could require” should be changed to “would require”. To execute the reviewers’ aforementioned suggestions and correct the sentence in the same way, “could require” was changed to “would have required” in page 21, line 517. (Moreover, for the same reason, “amount of” was deleted from the sentence in page 21, line 517, as well.)

28) Reviewer 1 suggested (regarding page 22, line 518) that “it” should be changed to “this”. Reviewer 2 noted that “could also live” should be changed to “also lived” (page 22, line 525) and “could be” should be changed to “was” (page 22, line 530). Following the reviewers’ suggestions, we modified the text accordingly.

29) Reviewer 1 mentioned that figures “would benefit from arrows indicating regions of pathological activity”. Following Reviewer 1’s comment, arrows were placed on several figures.

30) Reviewer 3 noted that Figure 1C should be changed to a better quality drawing. Following Reviewer 3’s advice, Figure 1C was redrawn.

31) We have been asked to review our reference list and if we have cited papers that have been retracted, we should remove them and replace them with relevant current references. When we reviewed our reference list, we found one reference (i.e., Jaswani, 2019 – https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=2436063) that might have been retracted since we submitted our manuscript in October, 2020. We removed this reference and replaced it with Spiegel et al., 2005.

In the revised version of our manuscript, we tried to execute all suggestions of the reviewers. I hope this new version will be suitable for publication in PLOS ONE.

Thank you again for the reviewers’ insightful and constructive comments and your editorial work!

Sincerely yours,

Dr. Olga Spekker, PhD

corresponding author

Attachment

Submitted filename: response_to_reviewers_Spekker_et_al.doc

Decision Letter 1

Mark Spigelman

29 Mar 2021

An unusual case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)

PONE-D-20-32041R1

Dear Dr. Spekker

We’re pleased to inform you that as you have replied to thee reviewers comments satisfactorily your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mark Spigelman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mark Spigelman

5 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-32041R1

An unusual case of childhood osteoarticular tuberculosis from the Árpádian Age cemetery of Győrszentiván-Révhegyi tag (Győr-Moson-Sopron county, Hungary)

Dear Dr. Spekker:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mark Spigelman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Video. 3D reconstruction of the severe angular kyphosis (Pott’s gibbus) in the T1–6 region of the spine.

    (MP4)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-32041r.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response_to_reviewers_Spekker_et_al.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES