Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Apr 14;11:8193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87517-z

No association between pyrite content and lung cell responses to coal particles

Graeme R Zosky 1,2,✉, Ellen J Bennett 2, Macarena Pavez 3, B Basil Beamish 4,5
PMCID: PMC8046986  PMID: 33854135

Abstract

There has been an increase in the identification of cases of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP) in recent years around the world. While there are a range of possible explanations for this, studies have implicated the pyrite content of coal as a key determinant of CWP risk. However, experimental studies to support this link are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the pyrite content, and subsequent release of bioavailable iron, in coal particles and the response of lung cells involved in the pathogenesis of CWP (epithelial cells, macrophages and fibroblasts). Using real-world Australian coal samples, we found no evidence of an association between the pyrite content of the coal and the magnitude of the detrimental cell response. We did find evidence of an increase in IL-8 production by epithelial cells with increasing bioavailable iron (p = 0.01), however, this was not linked to the pyrite content of the coal (p = 0.75) and we did not see any evidence of a positive association in the other cell types. Given the lack of association between the pyrite content of real-world coal particles and lung cell cytotoxicity (epithelial cells and macrophages), inflammatory cytokine production (epithelial cells, macrophages and fibroblasts), and cell proliferation (fibroblasts) our data do not support the use of coal pyrite content as a predictor of CWP risk.

Subject terms: Respiratory tract diseases, Risk factors

Introduction

Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis (CWP) is an incurable interstitial lung disease that results from chronic inhalation of respirable coal dust particles. In recent years there has been an increase in the reported cases of CWP around the world including in regions of the United States1 and, more recently, in Australia2. As a result, there has been a surge in interest in the potential contributors to the risk of developing CWP.

Many studies have shown a relationship between the chemistry of respirable particulate matter (PM) and the magnitude of the adverse respiratory response in a range of contexts3,4. In the case of coal derived PM, some studies have suggested that the pyrite content of coal is linked to the risk of CWP. For example, a study combining CWP data and coal quality information from the U.S. Geological Survey showed a correlation between the prevalence of CWP and the pyritic sulphur content of the coal5. Using a chemical modelling approach, this association was linked to the liberation of bioavailable iron by the pyrite5. This is a biologically plausible link, given the importance of iron metabolism in the regulation of cellular inflammation and tissue injury in the lung6.

However, few experimental studies have been conducted to assess this link directly in lung cells. One early study showed that the pyrite content of coal was associated with the liberation of reactive oxygen species, however the particles used were much larger than the respirable fraction and the effect on RNA degradation was characterised in yeast rather than lung cells7. A more recent study found that inflammation induced by coal particles in alveolar epithelial cells (A549) was greatest in particles with a high pyrite content, however the dose–response was not linear and other markers, such as generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytotoxicity, were higher in the samples without pyrite than those with relatively high levels of pyrite8.

While the development of CWP is clearly linked to chronic inhalation of coal particles, the pathogenesis of the disease is complex and involves multiple cell types within the lung9,10. CWP develops as a result of chronic inflammation due to long-term inhalation of coal particles. Persistent inflammation, which is initiated and driven by the response of epithelial cells and resident macrophages to the coal particles8,11, leads to tissue injury and a cycle of aberrant repair which promotes fibrosis and irreversible lung damage12. Thus, the respiratory response to coal inhalation is influenced by epithelial cells, as the first point of contact for inhaled particles, macrophages, which phagocytose the particles, and fibroblasts, which can drive the irreversible fibrosis that is characteristic of the disease10.

The overall aim of this study was to determine the association between the pyrite content of coal particles and the lung cell response, to further assess the reported link between pyritic coal and the risk of CWP. To achieve this, we assessed the effect of coal particles with different levels of pyrite on the cytotoxic and inflammatory response in epithelial cells and macrophages and the proliferative response in fibroblasts. We then assessed the association between these responses and bioavailable iron release in simulated lung fluids.

Results

Coal characteristics

Physical and chemical properties

With the exception of sample J, which consisted of concentrated pyrite associated with a non-coal band of the coal seam, all samples were highly volatile bituminous coals with a range of pyrite contents (Table 1). The particle size range was relatively consistent between samples (median: 3.52–6.57 µm; Table 1) and endotoxin levels were all below the limit of detection of the assay (0.1 EU/mL) (data not shown).

Table 1.

Summary of the characteristics of the 10 coal samples used to assess the association between the pyrite content, iron release and the cellular response.

Sample Pyrite (%) Particle size (median—μm)
A 2.79 3.86
B 10.35 4.59
C 1.10 4.39
D 0.79 4.91
E 0.37 3.98
F 2.43 4.67
G 7.32 4.14
H 5.81 3.52
I 34.99 6.57
J 49.70 4.04
Open in a new tab

Iron bioavailability

Iron release varied considerably between samples depending on which solution was used. The total iron content in the Gamble’s solution was far more variable than iron release into the ALF (Fig. 1); in almost all cases the release of iron was almost exclusively in the form of Fe3+ with relatively low levels of Fe2+ detected. There was no association between the pyrite content of the sample (R = 0.07; p = 0.85) and total iron release in Gamble’s solution. There was, however, a strong positive association between the pyrite content of the sample (R = 0.88; p < 0.001) and the total iron release in ALF.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Bioavailable iron (total Fe) for the 10 coal samples measured after 24 h in Gamble’s solution (A) or artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF; B) measured by ferritin assay.

Epithelial cells

Exposure to coal particles had minimal effect on cytotoxicity (LDH release) in A549 cells. While the response was variable, only the 200 µg/mL dose of sample G caused a statistically significant increase in LDH production (p = 0.04) compared to control (Fig. 2A). Samples D, E, F, G, H and I (p < 0.1 for all comparisons) caused an increase in IL-8 production by A549 cells at the 50 µg/mL dose compared to control levels (Fig. 2B). An increase in IL-8 production was detected in all samples at the 200 µg/mL (p < 0.001 for all comparisons versus control) which was dose-dependent in all coal samples except sample D (p = 0.22) (Fig. 2B). IL-6 production by A549 cells in response to the coal particles was also assessed, however, levels of this cytokine were below the limit of detection in all experiments (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Relative cytotoxicity (A), measured as LDH release relative to control (cell only), and IL-8 production, measured in the cell supernatant by ELISA, in epithelial cells (A549) in response to 24 h exposure to 50 µg/mL (white bars) or 200 µg/mL (black bars) of coal particles (samples A–J). Data are presented as mean (SD). *p < 0.05, versus cell only; #p < 0.05, 200 µg/mL vs 50 µg/mL.

Macrophages

Exposure to coal particles caused dose-dependent decreases (p < 0.001 for 50 vs 200 µg/mL for all comparisons) in THP-1 cell survival (Fig. 3A). With the exception of sample C, where exposure to 50 µg/mL of particles caused a significant decrease in cell survival (p = 0.020), this cytotoxic effect was only detectable at the 200 µg/mL dose. In line with this response, exposure to all coal samples caused a dose-dependent (p < 0.001 for 50 vs 200 µg/mL for all comparisons) increase in IL-8 production in THP-1 cells (Fig. 3B). This effect was detectable at the 50 µg/mL dose for samples B, C, F and J (p < 0.02 for all comparisons) compared to control levels and for all coal samples at the 200 µg/mL dose (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). TNF-α and IL-1β production by THP-1 cells in response to the coal particles were also assessed, however, levels of these cytokines were below the limit of detection in all experiments (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Relative cytotoxicity (A), measured by Trypan blue exclusion relative to control (cell only), and IL-8 production, measured in the cell supernatant by ELISA, in macrophages (THP-1 derived) in response to 24 h exposure to 50 µg/mL (white bars) or 200 µg/mL (black bars) of coal particles (samples A–J). Data are presented as mean (SD). *p < 0.05, versus cell only; #p < 0.05, 200 µg/mL vs 50 µg/mL.

Fibroblasts

The fibroblast proliferative response to exposure to coal particles was highly variable. Sample E, F, G, H, I and J had no effect on cell proliferation (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). In contrast, samples A (p < 0.01), B (p < 0.001) and C (p = 0.02) caused significant decreases in cell proliferation at the 200 µg/mL which could also be detected at 50 µg/mL for the A sample; implying these coal samples were cytotoxic to fibroblasts (Fig. 4A). In line with their adverse effect on proliferation, samples A (50 µg/mL, p < 0.01; 200 µg/mL, p < 0.001), B (200 µg/mL, p < 0.001) and C (200 µg/mL, p < 0.001) caused a significant increase in collagen production in fibroblasts compared to controls. In addition, exposure to 200 µg/mL of samples G (p = 0.001) and H (p = 0.03) also increased collagen production when fibroblasts were exposed to 200 µg/mL of these samples (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Relative cell proliferation (A), measured by WST-assay relative to control (cell only), and soluble collagen production, measured in the cell supernatant by colorimetric assay, in fibroblasts (CRL-1490) in response to 24 h exposure to 50 µg/mL (white bars) or 200 µg/mL (black bars) of coal particles (samples A–J). Data are presented as mean (SD). *p < 0.05, versus cell only; #p < 0.05, 200 µg/mL vs 50 µg/mL.

Associations between the cellular response and the coal characteristics

Associations between the properties of the coal particles, with a focus on pyrite content and iron release (as appropriate to the cells used), and the cellular response to exposure to 200 µg/mL of particles were assessed by linear regression with adjustment for particle size as a covariate; outcomes of these analyses are summarised in Table 2. In summary, there was no association between the pyrite content of the coal and any of the measures of cytotoxicity, cell proliferation, cytokine or collagen production in any of the cell types (p > 0.1 for all comparisons). There was a significant association between iron release by the coal particles and IL-8 production in epithelial cells (p = 0.01), but no associations with any of the other outcome measure across cell types (p > 0.15 for all comparisons).

Table 2.

Outcomes of linear regression analyses, adjusted for particle size, for the association between cell responses and the properties of the coal particles the cells were exposed to (pyrite content and bioavailable iron).

Cell type Outcome Pyrite Bioavailable Iron
β [95% CI] p β [95% CI] p
Epithelial cells Cytotoxicity 0 [− 0.01, 0.01] 0.61 0.06 [− 0.05, 0.18] 0.24
IL-8 − 1.31 [− 10.66, 8.03] 0.75 121.03 [40.49, 201.62] 0.01
Macrophages Cytotoxicity 0 [0, 0] 0.18 − 0.02 [− 0.16, 0.17] 0.67
IL-8 − 4.64 [− 17.24, 7.97] 0.41 − 299.78 [− 747.81, 148.24] 0.16
Fibroblasts Proliferation 0 [− 0.02, 0.02] 0.78 − 0.04 [− 0.30, 0.22] 0.74
Collagen − 0.83 [− 1.96, 0.30] 0.13 0.71 [− 18.68, 20.09] 0.93
Open in a new tab

Bold indicates p < 0.05

Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between pyrite, the subsequent release of iron, and the cellular response to coal particles. We assessed this using real-world coal samples with a range of pyrite contents in key cell types that are involved in the pathogenesis of CWP. It was clear from our data that the magnitude of the cell response varied considerably between samples depending on the cell type and the outcome measure; suggesting that coal properties are likely to influence the risk of CWP. However, based on the cell-types we studied, we found no evidence of an association between the pyrite content of the coal and the magnitude of the detrimental cell response. We did find evidence of an increase in IL-8 production by epithelial cells with increasing bioavailable iron, however, this was not linked to the pyrite content of the coal and we did not see any evidence of an association in the other cell types. Collectively, these observations are contrary to the suggestion that the pyrite content of coal dust is a key determinant of CWP risk.

Our data clearly showed that coal particles were cytotoxic10,13, pro-inflammatory10,14 and pro-fibrotic10. This is consistent with the long history of literature on the health effects of coal dust; particularly chronic respiratory diseases including pneumoconiosis15. We observed substantial increases in production of IL-8 by epithelial cells and macrophages in our system. IL-8 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and neutrophil chemo-attractant, that is known to be produced by epithelial cells and macrophages in response to a range of respiratory insults (pathogenic and non-pathogenic)16 and is a biomarker of the presence and severity of CWP17. The coal particles also induced significant cytotoxicity, particularly in macrophages, which is consistent with the role of tissue injury in CWP18. Similarly, exposure to coal particles caused a significant increase in the production of soluble collagen by fibroblasts; consistent with the fibrotic pathology of CWP19. Thus, the cell lines in our system had responses that are aligned with the known effects of coal particles on lung cells and the development of CWP.

Importantly, the magnitude of the responses outlined above varied considerably between coal samples. Given the relative consistency of the particle size between samples, likely due to the milling process, this observation suggests coal chemistry is an important determinant of the cell response and, hence, the CWP risk. The potential modifying effect of particle chemistry is well documented in the literature in a range of contexts related to coal dust20,21; however, contrary to some reports7,8, we found no evidence for an association between the pyrite content of the coal and its cytotoxic, inflammatory or fibrotic potential. It is worth noting that we do not have measures of other chemical components of the particles, as our focus was purely on pyrite as a determinant of CWP risk. However, we directly assessed the ability of pyrite to release free iron in biologically relevant simulated lung fluids. Consistent with the importance of pH in the release of iron by pyrite22 we found a strong positive association between the pyrite content of the coal and release of iron in the lower pH artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF), but not the simulated airway lining fluid. We found no evidence for an association between the release of iron in ALF, or pyrite, and the macrophage response. Given the key role that macrophages play in the pathogenesis of CWP23, this does not support a role for pyrite and/or iron availability in macrophage driven CWP pathology. Similarly, we found no association between pyrite content or iron release in simulated lung fluid and the proliferative potential or collagen production by fibroblasts—also suggest that the pyrite content, and iron release, by coal particles has no direct influence on fibrotic response by fibroblasts.

The seminal paper by Huang and colleagues5 showed a correlation between the prevalence of CWP and pyritic sulphur content of the coal seam in the mine location. This analysis was extended to estimate bioavailable iron release, based on modelled chemical interactions in the coal, which showed a strong correlation with CWP risk. This built on previous work showing a positive association between low molecular weight iron and lipid peroxidation in lung cells24 and follow up studies showing an association between the pyrite content of coal and the inflammatory response8. While it is worth noting that we found no association between the pyrite content of our coal samples and the outcomes in A549 cells, we did find a positive correlation with iron release in simulated lung fluid which is consistent with these observations. It is possible that there are other components of the coal that may have contributed to this correlation, for example in previous work showing an association between the pyrite content of coal particles and the inflammatory response in A549 cells, the samples with the highest pyrite/iron also had much higher mercury content than the low pyrite/iron samples8. This may be an issue given mercury is known to induce inflammation which casts some doubt on the strength of this association25. Nonetheless, the consistency of these observations suggested that iron release by the particles is indeed a determinant of the inflammatory response in this cell line; however, this is not necessarily directly correlated with the pyrite content as shown in our data.

Our study had several limitations which are worth noting. Firstly, we used immortalised cell lines each studied in isolation. While this could be improved through the use of co-exposure model, in vivo models and/or the use of the primary cells lines, this approach allowed us to screen a large number of coal samples in a range of cell types and was appropriate for the proof-of-principle nature of the study. In addition, the doses chosen are likely to be higher than real-world exposure on a particle per surface area basis, however, they are entirely consistent with similar toxicological studies and allowed us to test the hypothesis.

In summary, our study clearly showed, using real-world coal samples, that there is no association between the pyrite content of coal and the magnitude of the response in a range of important lung cell types that are relevant to the pathogenesis of CWP. While this does not take into account the impact of other aspects of coal chemistry on the potential release of bioavailable iron, it is an important observation as the regulatory assessment of the CWP hazard in the mining environment often considers the pyrite content of the coal.

Methods

Coal samples

10 coal samples (A–J) were sourced from Australian underground coal mine core samples and crushed. The pyrite content was calculated according to industry standards (AS1308.11-2002; R2013) by calculating the total iron content following dissolution in nitric acid and subtracting this quantity from the iron content of the sulphur following barium sulphate precipitation. Particle size was determine using scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi SU-70 at 1.5 kV). The diameter of all particles on 3 fields of view at 1000× magnification was measured and used to generate a frequency distribution. This distribution was then used to calculate the weighted median particle size. The endotoxin content of the particles (in solution at a concentration of 100 µg/mL) was assessed using a chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL)-assay (88282; ThermoScientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Iron bioavailability

Iron bioavailability (total iron) was quantified in two solutions; Gamble’s solution, to simulate the airway surface lung fluid, and artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF), to simulate the environment when the particles are phagocytosed by macrophages26. Particles were prepared at a concentration of 100 µg/mL and left in solution (Gamble’s or ALF) for 24 h prior to assessment of total iron release using a colorimetric iron assay (ab83366; abcam) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, sample wells were made up to 100 µL with assay buffer. 5 µL of iron reducer was added and plates were incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. 100 µL of iron probe solution was added prior to incubation at 25 °C for 60 min in the dark. Plates were read at OD 593 nm.

Epithelial cells (A549)

Human alveolar epithelial cells (A549; ATCC) were cultured in Ham’s F-12K medium (21127030; Gibco) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) and glutamine (1%) at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2. Cells were seeded onto plates at 2 × 105 cells/mL prior to exposure to coal particles at concentrations of 0, 50 or 200 µg/mL for 24 h. Relative cytotoxicity was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay (G1780; Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and expressed as a value relative to control. The production of inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 by the cells was quantified in the supernatant by ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cytokine expression was adjusted to account for variations in cytotoxicity. All experiments were repeated 6 times (fresh cell and coal preparations on different days) to allow statistical comparisons to be made between samples.

Macrophages (THP-1)

Human monocytes (THP-1; ATCC) were expanded in growth medium (RPMI-1640; ATCC) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2. Cells were seeded onto plates at 2 × 105 cells/mL prior to differentiation into macrophages with (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 h. Cells were transferred to PMA-free RPMI for 24 h prior to exposure to coal particles at concentrations of 0, 50 or 200 µg/mL for 24 h. Cytotoxicity was assessed by trypan blue incorporation to assess cell survival and expressed as a value relative to control. The production of inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β and IL-8 by the cells was quantified in the supernatant by ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cytokine expression was adjusted to account for variations in cytotoxicity. All experiments were repeated 6 times (fresh cell and coal preparations on different days) to allow statistical comparisons to be made between samples.

Fibroblasts (CRL-1490)

Fibroblasts (CRL-1490; ATCC) were expanded in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM; ATCC) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%) at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2. Cells were seeded onto plates at 2 × 105 cells/mL prior to exposure to coal particles at concentrations of 0, 50 or 200 µg/mL for 24 h. Cell proliferation was assessed by WST-1 (ab155902; abcam) assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The production of collagen by the cells in response to coal particle exposure was assessed by soluble collagen assay (Sircol) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were repeated 6 times (fresh cell and coal preparations on different days) to allow statistical comparisons to be made between samples.

Statistical analysis

Between group comparisons were made using repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) with Holm-Sidak posthoc tests to assess between group difference when a significant main effect was observed. Where necessary, data were transformed to satisfy the assumptions of homoscedasticity and normal distribution of the error terms. Associations between the response and the coal characteristics (pyrite content and iron release) were assessed by linear regression with adjustment for particle size as a co-variate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; all data are reported as mean (SD).

Author contributions

G.R.Z. was involved in the design and conceptualisation of the study, data analysis and interpretation and drafted manuscript. E.J.B. was involved in the design of the study, data analysis and conducted the experiments. M.P. conducted experiments and was involved in data analysis. B.B.B. was involved in conceptualisation of the study, data interpretation and contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors provided input into the final manuscript.

Competing interests

BBB receives funding from the Coal Industry as part of his commercial services (B3 Mining Service Pty Ltd)—the work presented in this paper is not directly related to these commercial activities. This work was funded by the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP C27007) (BBB and GRZ). The funding body had no role in the design of the study, its execution or the analysis and interpretation of the data. EJB and MP have no competing interests to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Blackley DJ, Halldin CN, Laney AS. Continued increase in prevalence of coal workers' pneumosoniosis in the United States, 1970–2017. Am. J. Public Health. 2018;108:1220–1222. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zosky GR, et al. Coal workers' pneumoconiosis: An Australian perspective. Med. J. Aust. 2016;204:414–418. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jin W, et al. Properties and cellular effects of particulate matter from direct emissions and ambient sources. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. 2016;51:1075–1083. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2016.1198632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shao J, et al. The pro-inflammatory effects of particulate matter on epithelial cells are associated with elemental composition. Chemosphere. 2018;202:530–537. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang X, et al. Mapping and prediction of coal workers' pneumoconiosis with bioavailable iron content in the bituminous coals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005;113:964–968. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mateos F, Brock JH, Perez-Arellano JL. Iron metabolism in the lower respiratory tract. Thorax. 1998;53:594–600. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.7.594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohn CA, Laffers R, Simon SR, O'Riordan T, Schoonen MAA. Role of pyrite in formation of hydroxyl radicals in coal: Possible implications for human health. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2006;3:16. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harrington AD, Tsirka SE, Schoonen MAA. Inflammatory stress response in A549 cells as a result of exposure to coal: Evidence for the role of pyrite in coal workers' pneumoconiosis pathogenesis. Chemosphere. 2013;93:1216–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heppleston AG. Prevalence and pthogenesis of pneumoconiosis in coal workers. Environ. Health Perspect. 1988;78:159–170. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8878159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schins RPF, Borm PJA. Mechanisms and mediators in coal dust induced toxicity: A review. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1999;43:7–33. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(98)00069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kusaka Y, Brown GM, Donaldson K. Alveolitis caused by exposure to coal mine dusts: Production of interleukin-1 and immunomodulation by bronchoalveolar leukocytes. Environ. Res. 1990;53:76–89. doi: 10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yucesoy B, et al. Genetic susceptibility to progressive massive fibrosis in coal miners. Eur. Respir. J. 2008;31:1177–1182. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00075107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leon-Mejia G, et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by coal and coal fly ash particle samples in V79 cells. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016;23:24019–24031. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7623-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown GM, Donaldson K. Inflammatory responses in lungs of rats inhaling coalmine dust: Enhanced proteolysis of fibronectin by bronchoalveolar leukocytes. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1989;46:866–872. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.12.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perret JL, et al. Coal mine dust lung disease in the modern era. Respirology. 2017;22:662–670. doi: 10.1111/resp.13034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pease JE, Sabroe I. The role of interleukin-8 and its receptors in inflammatory lung disease: Implications for therapy. Am. J. Respir. Med. 2002;1:19–25. doi: 10.1007/BF03257159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim K-A, et al. Potential biomarker of coal workers' pneumoconiosis. Toxicol. Lett. 1999;108:297–302. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Castranova V, Vallyathan V. Silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000;108:674–684. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s4675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fisher ER, et al. Objective pathological diagnosis of coal workers' pneumoconiosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1981;245:1829–1834. doi: 10.1001/jama.1981.03310430021014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moreno T, et al. Trace element fractionation between PM10 and PM2.5 in coal mine dust: Implications for occupational respiratory health. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2019;203:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Christian RT, Nelson JB, Cody TE, Larson E, Bingham E. Coal workers' pneumoconiosis: In vitro study of the chemical composition and particle size as causes of the toxic effects of coal. Environ. Res. 1979;20:358–365. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(79)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schoonen M, Elsetinow A, Borda M, Strongin D. Effect of temperature and illumination on pyrite oxidation between pH 2 and 6. Geochem. Trans. 2000;1:23. doi: 10.1186/1467-4866-1-23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vahnee D, Gosset P, Boitelle A, Wallaert B, Tonnel AB. Cytokine and cytokine network in silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis. Eur. Respir. J. 1995;8:834–842. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Q, Huang X. Induction of ferritin and lipid peroxidation by coal samples with different prevalence of coal workers' pneumoconiosis: Role of iron in the coals. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2002;42:171–179. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pollard KM, Cauvi DM, Toomey CB, Hultman P, Kono DH. Mercury-induced inflammation and autoimmunity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019;1863:129299. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colombo C, Monhemius AJ, Plant JA. Platinum, palladium and rhodium release from vehicel exhaust catalysts and road dust exposed to simulated lung fluids. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008;71:722–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES