Skip to main content
Rare Tumors logoLink to Rare Tumors
. 2021 Apr 12;13:20363613211007767. doi: 10.1177/20363613211007767

Signet ring cell cancer of Ampulla of Vater—first ever case reported in a teenager and a review of literature

Asad Ali Kerawala 1,, Abid Jamal 1, Lubna Saleem 1
PMCID: PMC8047084  PMID: 33912327

Abstract

Ampullary cancers are rare accounting for 0.2% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Signet ring is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma, characterized by having more than 50% of mucin secreting cells and clinically having a worse prognosis. We present the case of a teenage girl with this tumor, the youngest ever reported in medical literature. An 18 years old girl with no significant past medical history presented to our clinic with symptoms of upper abdominal pain and jaundice. Her upper GI endoscopy showed an ampullary lesion which was biopsied—diagnosing it as adenocarcinoma. She underwent a pancreato-duodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure) with Child’s reconstruction and a feeding jejunostomy. Her final histopathology report was documented as infiltrating adenocarcinoma of Signet Ring variety arising from the Ampulla of Vater. Being such a rare entity, there is a lack of randomized trials advising the optimum treatment for such cases. Till then anecdotal experiences will drive the optimum management of this rare disease.

Keywords: Cancer, signet ring cancer, adenocarcinoma, whipple, Ampulla of Vater, ampullary

Introduction

Ampullary cancers are rare accounting for 0.2% of all gastrointestinal cancers. Majority being adenocarcinomas, other varieties include papillary, Adenosquamous, and Mucinous. Histologically they are defined as being intestinal or Pancreatobiliary in origin. Signet ring is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma, characterized by having more than 50% of mucin secreting cells and clinically having a worse prognosis. We present the case of a teenage girl with this tumor, the youngest ever reported in medical literature.

Case

An 18 years old girl with no significant past medical history presented to our clinic with symptoms of upper abdominal pain and jaundice. Her ultrasound showed significant intrahepatic biliary dilatation. Her upper GI endoscopy showed an ampullary lesion which was biopsied—diagnosing it as adenocarcinoma. On further probing it was found that her mother had also developed duodenal cancer few years ago, however she couldn’t get any treatment and succumbed to the disease. On abdominal CAT scan the lesion was resectable and the decision was taken to operate her after discussion in the Institutional Tumor Board. She underwent a pancreato-duodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure) with Child’s reconstruction and a feeding jejunostomy. Her postoperative course was uneventful and she was discharged home on sixth POD. Her final histopathology report was documented as infiltrating adenocarcinoma of Signet Ring variety arising from the Ampulla of Vater (Figure 1). Size of lesion was 2.5 cm by 0.9 cm, margins clear and 0 out of 17 nodes were involved. The patient was advised Adjuvant Chemotherapy but not complied upon. She was lost to follow up and returned 8 months later with a large abdominal mass—biopsy proved it as metastatic adenocarcinoma of signet ring variety, confirming it to be recurrence of the Ampullary Carcinoma. She was put on Chemotherapy with palliative intent as the recurrent mass was surgically irresectable (Figure 2). After three cycles of Gemcitabine and 5 FU, she did not respond to the therapy.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Biopsy of Surgical specimen. Signet ring cells on high magnification (poorly cohesive cells with central vacuoles containing intracytoplasmic mucin.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Large abdominal mass.

A-Liver, B-Right Kidney, C-Tumor Recurrence, D-Spleen.

Discussion

Also known as poorly cohesive type—Signet ring cell cancer demonstrates characteristic signet-ring cells with intracytoplasmic mucin and typical eccentrically located, crescent shaped nuclei (Figure 3). Most commonly found in the stomach, signet ring variety of the ampulla is an unusual and aggressive variant with only a handful of cases being reported in the literature (Table 1). Gardner et al.1 was the first one to report SRCC as a variant of adenocarcinoma in 1990. Since then only 38 cases have been reported in the medical literature most of them being ages 40 and above.2 Twenty-one of them were males and 19 females. The youngest reported was 32 years old female by Purohit et al. in 20053 and the oldest being 82 years old female by Ushida et al.4 in 2017. The average age at presentation was 59 years. Our case is strange because this is the only case of such a tumor in a teenager. The largest case series has been published by Wen et al.5 who reported eight cases from a single institution in Hangzhou, China. Adenocarcinoma arising from the Ampulla of Vater is unusual owing to the presence of three different types of epithelial cell linings there—intestinal, pancreatic, and Biliary. There is no consensus on the origin of Signet ring cell cancers. Blundell et al.6 hypothesized that these originate from neuroendocrine cells in the gastric mucosa causing metaplasia. However, Wen et al.5 from his study has proposed classification into four different types I, PB, gastric, and mixed. They also observed that presence of gastric mucosa or neuroendocrine cells was not mandatory for SRCC thus negating Blundell. Expression of CK7, along with negativity for CK20, CDX-2, and MUC2 signifies pancreatobiliary type SRCC, and vice-versa.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Signet ring cells—on Surgical specimen biopsy.

Table 1.

Reported Cases of Signet Ring Cell Cancer of Ampulla of Vater in Medical Literature.

Author Year Age Sex Stage
Sekoguchi and Mizumoto7 1979 47 Male T3 N0
Gardner et al.1 1990 69 Female T3 N0
Tseng et al.8 2002 47 Male T3 N0
Hara et al.9 2002 68 Male T2 N0
Eriguchi et al.10 2003 83 Male T3 N0
Nabeshima et al.11 2003 49 Male T3 Nx
Fang et a.12 2004 53 Male T2 N0
Ramia et al.13 2004 67 Female T2 N0
Li et al.14 2004 56 Female T2 N1
Valeri et al.15 2005 66 Male N.A
Purohit et al.3 2005 32 Female N.A
Bloomston et al.16 2006 58 Female T2 N0
Akatsu et al.17 2007 43 Female T2 N0
Ishibashi et al.18 2009 59 Male T3 N0
Gao et al.19 2009 38 Female T3 N0
Kim et al.20 2010 47 Male Tx N1
Maekawa et al.21 2011 72 Male T3 N0
Garcia et al.22 (2 cases) 2011 74, 73 Males T3 N0, T2 N1
Paplomata and Wilfong23 2011 45 Female T4 N1
Tas et al.24 2011 40 Male Tx N1
Gheza et al.25 2011 66 Male NA
Daoudi et al.26 2012 55 Male T3 N0
Lesquerex-Martínez et al.27 2012 78 Female Tx N0
Terada28 2012 74 Female NA
Acharya et al.29 2013 78 Female T3 N0
Wen et al.5(8 cases) 2014 40 - 78 4 Males, 4 Females T3 N0–T4 N1
Wakasugi et al.30 2015 59 Female T3 N1
Rahul et al.31 2016 53 Male T4 N1
de Klein et al.32 2018 45 Female T2 N0
Ushida et al.4 2017 82 Female T3 N0
Forneli et al.33 2019 49 Male NA
Ikeda et al.2 2019 74 Female T2 N0
Our case 2020 18 Female T2 N0

Most of the ampullary cancers present early2 as they cause obstruction to the biliary tract and the patient presents with obstructive jaundice. Not all ampullary cancers are obvious on the CAT scan. Those that are visible, have subtle findings of thickening and mass in some cases. Hence, Endoscopic Ultrasound is considered the gold standard to visualize and biopsy any ampullary lesion. Once the lesion has been confirmed and the biopsy shows dysplasia or invasive cancer, the cornerstone of treatment is surgery—Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction. Most of the cases reported in the literature did not have lymph node involvement,2 just like the girl in our case. Only seven cases out of all the reported ones had Lymph node metastasis or N1 disease.2 Patients like these have been offered adjuvant chemotherapy in some cases while some have just been observed. Being such a rare entity, there is a paucity of data on adjuvant treatment and no randomized trials to show any benefit.

Conclusions

Gardner et al.1 was the first one to report SRCC as a variant of adenocarcinoma in 1990. The Dutch guidelines do not recommend any adjuvant therapy for completely resected ampullary cancer.34 However the SRCC variety being more aggressive may need adjuvant therapy. Being such a rare entity, there is a lack of randomized trials advising the optimum treatment for such cases. Till then anecdotal experiences will drive the optimum management of this rare disease.

Footnotes

Author contributions: AAK drafted the initial manuscript. AJ and LS reviewed the final draft and helped in critical analysis.

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval: Reporting of individual rare cases does not require Ethical Committee approval at our institute—cancer Foundation Hospital, Karachi.

Informed consent: Written and informed consent was Taken from patient and family.

ORCID iD: Asad Ali Kerawala Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8732-5750

References

  • 1. Gardner HA, Matthews J, Ciano PS. A signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990; 114(10): 1071–1072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ikeda C, Makino N, Matsuda A, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case diagnosed via repeated biopsies. Clin J Gastroenterol 2020; 13: 607–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Purohit RC, Kant K, Bhargava N, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of ampulla of Vater in a young adult. Indian J Gastroenterol 2005; 24(5): 222–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ushida Y, Hiramatsu K, Saeki S, et al. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells in duodenal papilla: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2017; 3(1): 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wen X, Wu W, Wang B, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: immunophenotype and differentiation. Oncol Lett 2014; 8: 1687–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Blundell CR, Kanun CS, Earnest DL. Biliary obstruction by heterotopic gastric mucosa at the ampulla of Vater. Am J Gastroenterol 1982; 77: 111–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sekoguchi T, Mizumoto R. Clinicopathological study of papilla of Vater. Geka Chiryo 1979; 41: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tseng LJ, Jao YT, Mo LR. Signet ring cell carcinoma of major papilla. Gastroint Endosc 2002; 56: 733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hara T, Kawashima H, Ishigooka M, et al. Signet-ring-cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case report. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 561–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Eriguchi N, Aoyagi S, Jimi A. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of a case. Surg Today 2003; 33: 467–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nabeshima S, Kishihara Y, Nabeshima A, et al. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells of the Vater’s ampulla, without jaundice but with disseminated carcinomatosis. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2003; 94: 235–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fang CL, Chu JS, Hsieh MC, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. J Formos Med Assoc 2004; 103: 793–796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ramia JM, Mansilla A, Villar J, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the Vater’s ampulla. JOP 2004; 5: 495–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Li L, Chen QH, Sullivan JD, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2004; 34: 471–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Valeri S, Caricato M, Ripetti V, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the Vater’s ampulla: report of a clinical case. Suppl Tumori 2005; 4: S61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bloomston M, Walker M, Frankel WL. Radical resection in signet ring carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of an 11-year survivor. Am Surg 2006; 72: 193–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Akatsu T, Aiura K, Takahashi S, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of a case. Surg Today 2007; 37: 1110–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ishibashi Y, Ito Y, Omori K, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. A case report. JOP 2009; 10: 690–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gao JM, Tang SS, Fu W, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 888–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kim DI, Park SW, Lee GS, et al. A case of signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Korean J Gastroint Endosc 2010; 41: 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Maekawa H, Sakurada M, Orita H, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma co-existing with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of vater. A case report. JOP 2011; 12: 162–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. García AB, Arranz EM, Sanz RR, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 34: 141–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Paplomata E, Wilfong L. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with leptomeningeal metastases: a case report. J ClinOncol 2011; 29: e627–e629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tas A, Ozer E, Köklü S, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of vater: rare cause of acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 126–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gheza F, Ceryi E, Pulcini G, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: demonstration of pancreatobiliary origin. Pancreas 2011; 40: 791–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Daoudi K, El Haoudi K, Bouyahia N, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the Vater’s ampulla: a very rare malignancy. Case Rep Oncol Med 2012; 2012: 402798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lesquereux-Martínez L, Fernández-Pérez A, Bustamante-Montalvo M. Signet ring cell adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a rare pathology. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012; 104: 501–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Terada T. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case report with an immunohistochemical study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2012; 20: 427–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Acharya MN, Panagiotopoulos N, Cohen P, et al. Poorly-differentiated signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of a rare malignancy. JOP 2013; 14: 190–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wakasugi M, Tanemura M, Furukawa K, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of a case and a review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 12: 108–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rahul D, Joshua W, Andrei C. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with early development of bone metastasis: case report and review of the rare malignancy. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 47: 89–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. de Klein GW, van Baarlen J, Mekenkamp LJ, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a rare histopathological variant. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2018; 12: 194–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Forneli A, Zanini N, De Biase D, et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with focal neuroendocrine differentiation of the amphicrine type: report of a case with long-term survival. Int J Surg Pathol 2019; 27: 89–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Landelijke werkgroep Gastro intestinale tumoren. Oncoline pancreascarcinoom, 2011. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Rare Tumors are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES