Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2021 Apr 12;9:e10936. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10936

Sexual dimorphism in mud crabs: a tale of three sympatric Scylla species

Hanafiah Fazhan 1,2,3, Khor Waiho 1,2,, Yushinta Fujaya 4, Nita Rukminasari 4, Hongyu Ma 2,3, Mhd Ikhwanuddin 1,2,
Editor: Isabella Bordon
PMCID: PMC8048398  PMID: 33954025

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is a common phenomenon in the animal kingdom. To test the consistency of sexual dimorphism patterns among sympatric species of the same genus, ten morphometric characteristics of mud crabs Scylla olivacea, S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain were measured and compared using Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). The descriptive analysis revealed that in all three species, body size dimensions and cheliped dimensions were significantly larger in males whereas the abdomen width was female-biased. Also, we described a morphological variation (carapace width, CW ≤ CW at spine 8, 8CW) that is unique to S. olivacea. Discriminant function analysis revealed that all nine morphometric characteristics were sexually dimorphic in S. olivacea, S. tranquebarica (except right cheliped’s merus length, ML) and S. paramamosain (except 8CW). The obtained discriminant functions based on the morphometric ratios (with CW as divisor) correctly classified 100% of adults of known sex of all three species. Further, based on the selected body traits, DFA was able to almost completely distinguish males (94%), but not females (74%), among the three Scylla species. This study highlights that congeneric species of portunids (e.g., Scylla spp.) show similar sexually dimorphic characteristics (body size and secondary sexual characteristics).

Keywords: Discriminant function, Morphometric, Morphology, Portunids, Sexual dimorphism, Scylla

Introduction

Sexual size dimorphism is defined as the phenotypic differences in body dimensions and proportions between males and females (Glucksmann, 1974), and is common among most animal and plant species (Wyman, Stinchcombe & Rowe, 2013). Sexual size dimorphism may result from natural selection, sexual selection (Jones & Ratterman, 2009), or ecological causes including adaptive pressures (De Camargo & De Oliveira, 2012; Sganga, Piana & López Greco, 2016). Male-biased size dimorphism is common in most brachyuran species as it improves the chances of winning in competition (for food and space) (Brockerhoff & McLay, 2005) and in mating (Reading & Backwell, 2007; Waiho et al., 2015; Fazhan et al., 2017b); Meanwhile, larger body sizes in females allow better investment in reproductive output, i.e., higher fecundity (Anderson, 1994). Brachyuran families that exhibit male-biased sexual size dimorphism includes most species of the family Portunidae (Abelló, Pertierra & Reid, 1990), Potamidae (Parvizi et al., 2017), Ocypodidae (Johnson, 2003) and Sesarmidae (Marochi et al., 2019). Female-biased sexual size dimorphism is less common in brachyurans and has only been reported in the brackish-water crab Deiratonotus kaoriae Miura, Kawane and Wada 2007 (Camptandriidae) (Kawane et al., 2012) and Ilyograpsus nodulosus T. Sakai 1983 (Macrophthalmidae) (Nakayama & Wada, 2015).

Apart from body size dimensions, crustaceans also show marked sexual dimorphism in terms of secondary sexual characteristics. For example, males of most crab species often exhibit larger chelipeds for territorial defence, combat, courting and mating, with the most obvious being those of the fiddler crabs (Bildstein, McDowell & Brisbin, 1989; Tina, Jaroensutasinne & Jaroensutasinee, 2015), while females tend to have broader abdominal pleons for reproductive purposes (Giraldes et al., 2016; Waiho, Fazhan & Ikhwanuddin, 2016). These phenotypic differences between sexes greatly influenced the commercial value of economically important brachyuran species. For instance, in mud crab Scylla De Haan 1833, larger male crabs with prominent secondary sexual characteristics and females with well-developed ovaries are high-priced and highly sought-after by consumers (Waiho et al., 2016; Tang et al., 2020).

Although some sexual dimorphic characteristics are obvious, often most characteristics are differentiated quantitative and qualitatively via statistical analysis based on comparative morphometric techniques (Bertin et al., 2002) to allow precise differentiation of sexually dimorphic characteristics based on sex (Nakayama & Wada, 2015), life stages (Parvizi et al., 2017) or species (Barría et al., 2014). Owing to their hard exoskeleton and the presence of spines in many parts of their body, the measurement of morphometric characteristics in crustaceans are much easier to be conducted, making them a suitable model for morphometric studies (Hartnoll, 1982). Analysis of morphometric characteristics in crustaceans is useful in taxonomic, ecological, behavioural and evolutionary studies (Roth & Mercer, 2000; Accioly et al., 2013). For example, morphometric and molecular comparisons revealed that the smaller subtidal Cyrtograpsus affinis (Dana 1851) is closely related to the larger intertidal C. altimanus Rathbun 1914, and that they are postulated to be of the same species with high ecological and phenotypic plasticity (Spivak & Schubart, 2003). Further, morphometric variation is also useful for fisheries stock management (Bissaro, Gomes-Jr & Di Beneditto, 2012) as geographic variation in morphometry exists among stocks (Cadrin, 2000). The discriminant functions constructed using the morphometric differences between sacculinid-infected and healthy mud crabs also allow the detection of infected individuals based on their reduced morphometric characteristics (Waiho et al., 2017).

Discriminant function analysis categorises individuals to a certain group based on the linear combination of selected predictor variables. This method has been used in species identification (Jaiswara, Nandi & Balakrishnan, 2013), sex determination (Dechaume-Moncharmont, Monceau & Cezilly, 2011; Ferrer et al., 2016) and in the study of sexual size or shape dimorphism in various species, including birds (Niemc et al., 2018), fish (McGrath & Hilton, 2012), shrimps (Mantel & Dudgeon, 2005; Christodoulou & Anastasiadou, 2017) and crabs (Alencar et al., 2014; Parvizi et al., 2017). A thorough understanding of the body shape difference between sexes, especially in crustaceans provide important information regarding its physiological needs (Hartnoll, 2006; Waiho et al., 2016), ecological importance (Simpson, Ambrosio & Baeza, 2016) and evolutionary trends (Rufino, Abelló & Yule, 2004).

Mud crabs belonging to the genus Scylla are economically important crustacean species widely found throughout the Indo-West-Pacific region (Waiho et al., 2018; Fazhan et al., 2020). The global capture and aquaculture production of Scylla increased steadily within the last two decades and reached 45,393 t and 89,390 t in 2016, respectively (FAO, 2020). There are currently four species within this genus, i.e., S. serrata (Forskål 1775), S. tranquebarica (Fabricius 1798), S. paramamosain Estampador 1950 and S. olivacea (Herbst 1796) (Keenan, Davie & Mann, 1998), of which only the latter three species live in sympatry in the equatorial region around the South China Sea (Fazhan et al., 2017a; Fazhan et al., 2021). The taxonomic history of Scylla was eventful, with some researchers regarded all four as a single species (Stephenson & Campbell, 1960) while some disagreed (Estampador, 1949; Serene, 1952). Keenan, Davie & Mann (1998) revised the taxonomic classification of Scylla and classified this genus into four distinct species based on their morphological, morphometric and molecular variations. However, the morphological variation among species described by Keenan, Davie & Mann (1998) focused primarily on male specimens. To date, not much attention has been given to characterise the sexual size dimorphism characteristics between sexes and among species of Scylla. The current understanding of the sexual size dimorphism of Scylla spp.—males are generally larger—are based on observations and local knowledge. The lack of concrete data in this area greatly hinders the incorporation of numerous biotechnological manipulation techniques associated with commercially important traits, especially body size (Mei & Gui, 2015), into the enhancement of mud crab production (Shi et al., 2019; Waiho et al., 2019). For example, the characterisation of sexually dimorphic characteristics would allow better mapping of valuable traits using high-density linkage map, aid in the selection of potential regulatory genes and the identification of sex-specific markers (Waiho et al., 2019).

Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the morphometric variation in terms of body size dimensions and secondary sexual characteristics between males and females of mud crab genus Scylla, to identify which morphometric characteristics better reflect the sexual size dimorphism in mud crabs, and to compare these sexual dimorphic variations among species.

Material and Methods

Collection and characterisation of samples

Mud crabs were collected using commercial crab traps once every two months from three locations within Malaysia, namely Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Perak (4°45′N100°37′E), Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu (5°39′N102°43′E), and Kota Marudu Mangrove Forest, Sabah (6°44′N117°1′E) within the period of approximately three years (April 2012 to March 2015). No specific licensing is needed for mud crab acquisition as all sampling locations are common crab landing sites and mud crabs are not endangered or protected species. In addition to periodical sampling, morphometric measurements of mud crabs were also measured and recorded from the catches of local fishermen crabbing at the same sampling sites. Only healthy individuals with complete appendages were used. All morphometric characteristics of crabs were measured in the field when they were still alive. Crabs were either returned to fishermen, released back to the wild or used in other studies after data collection. To minimise confounding effect of allometric growth and sexual maturity, only mature specimens with carapace width (CW) of more than 95 mm were selected (Waiho et al., 2016). A total of 5,400 mature individuals were randomly sampled, i.e., 1,800 (900 males; 900 females) per species. Species identification was based on the key morphological characteristics provided by Keenan, Davie & Mann (1998), which includes polygonal patterning, coloration of the chelipeds, shape and height of the frontal lobe spines, and the presence and height of carpus and propodus spines on the chelipeds. Crabs were sexed according to their abdomen morphology—pointed and narrowed in males; darkened, globular and wide in mature females (Waiho et al., 2016; Fazhan et al., 2017b).

Morphometric characteristics measured

Ten morphometric characteristics, i.e., CW, CW at spine 8 (8CW), internal carapace width (ICW), carapace length (CL), abdomen width (AW), right cheliped’s dactyl length (DL), right cheliped’s propodus depth (PD), right cheliped’s propodus width (PW), right cheliped’s propodus length (PL) and right cheliped’s merus length (ML) were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm using a standard Vernier calliper (Fig. 1). The AW measured in both males and females referred to the largest width of the fifth abdomen somite. All raw measurements are provided in File S1.

Figure 1. Measurement of various body parts of mud crab Scylla spp. used in this study.

Figure 1

(A) Overall body dimensions—carapace width (CW), CW at spine 8 (8CW), internal carapace width (ICW) and carapace length (CL). (C) Abdomen width (AW). (B & D) Overall right cheliped dimensions—right cheliped’s propodus length (PL), right cheliped’s propodus width (PW), right cheliped’s merus length (ML), right cheliped’s dactyl length (DL) and right cheliped’s propodus depth (PD).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. We were only interested in discerning the sexual size dimorphism in the three Scylla species; hence variation due to geographical factors and inter-seasonal differences were not included in our analysis and crabs were grouped according to species followed by sex. The exclusion of geographical and inter-seasonal variables enables the generation of functions that could be used to evaluate the differences between sexes of adults caught throughout the year regardless of the sampled location. To assess the assumption of homogeneity of variances, all measurements were subjected to Levene’s test before proceeding to independent sample’s t-test to characterise the sexual size dimorphism between sexes in each species. Variables that failed to demonstrate equal variances were analysed using t-test with Welch correction. Measurements of abdomen and cheliped dimensions, i.e., AW, DL, PD, PL, ML and PW were converted to ratios by dividing by body size, i.e., CW before comparison between sexes. CW is the standard size measurement used in most portunids (Josileen, 2011), including mud crabs (Keenan, Davie & Mann, 1998; Waiho et al., 2016). By visual observation, the CWs of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica were larger than 8CW, whereas that of S. olivacea were smaller than 8CW. Thus, within each Scylla species, CW and 8CW were compared using paired t-test to validate this observation.

Further, nine morphometric ratios with CW as the divisor (control variable) were tabulated for males and females of each species and subjected to Stepwise discriminant function analysis (DFA). In addition, we also conducted DFA based solely on sex (combined species) to determine if the variation was significant among species. The minimum F value was set as 3.0 (0.05 significance level) (Keenan, Davie & Mann, 1998; Waiho et al., 2017). For functions discerning sex of each species, the halfway point of the two centroid values was used as the cut-off value of the derived function (Waiho et al., 2017). The significance of the derived discriminant function was tested using Wilks’ lamda (U statistic) while the significance of lambda was computed using Bartletts’ V transformation (chi-square statistic). Results were expressed as percentage of correct classification and the robustness of the function was validated using split-sample validation (cross-validation) method found within the SPSS package. For the comparison of morphometric ratios among species, One-way ANOVA with Welch correction and subsequent Games-Howell test were used.

Results

Comparing the sexual dimorphism of each species separately, the overall size dimensions (CW, ICW, 8CW, CL) of all three Scylla species were significantly larger in males than in females (all P < 0.01) (Table 1). In addition, secondary sexual characteristics such as AW and cheliped dimensions showed obvious sexual dimorphism as well. The AW of females was significantly larger compared to their male counterparts. Most cheliped dimensions were significantly larger in males, except for PL and ML (all P < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1. The comparison of morphometric characteristics between males and females of mud crab genus Scylla.

Measured morphometric characteristics include carapace width (CW), CW at spine 8 (8CW), internal carapace width (ICW), carapace length (CL), abdomen width (AW), right cheliped’s dactyl length (DL), right cheliped’s propodus depth (PD), right cheliped’s propodus width (PW), right chelipeds propodus length (PL) and right cheliped’s merus length (ML).

S. olivacea (x¯ ± s.d.) S. paramamosain (x¯ ± s.d.) S. tranquebarica (x¯ ± s.d.)
Male (n = 900) Female (n = 900) t Male (n = 900) Female (n = 900) t Male (n = 900) Female (n = 900) t
CW 111.84 ± 13.61* > 108.10 ± 10.30* 6.58 111.48 ± 11.84* > 109.71 ± 11.41* 5.95 115.02 ± 14.00* > 111.06 ± 11.34* 3.23
ICW 104.25 ± 12.50* > 101.62 ± 9.31* 5.06 103.72 ± 11.13* > 102.07 ± 11.01* 6.59 107.39 ± 13.22* > 104.05 ± 10.46* 3.17
8CW 112.92 ± 13.74* > 108.51 ± 10.35* 7.69 109.91 ± 11.73* > 108.21 ± 11.25* 7.16 113.55 ± 14.00* > 109.28 ± 11.14* 3.14
CL 77.81 ± 9.08* > 71.91 ± 7.27* 15.22 72.16 ± 7.88* > 70.02 ± 7.55* 9.02 75.20 ± 9.28* > 71.56 ± 7.74* 5.89
AW/CW 0.26 ± 0.01** < 0.44 ± 0.03** −166.19 0.25 ± 0.01** < 0.42 ± 0.02** −229.03 0.25 ± 0.01** < 0.42 ± 0.02** −232.95
DL/CW 1.46 ± 1.8E−4** > 0.71 ± 0.06** 409.72 1.36 ± 0.08** > 0.71 ± 0.04** 231.12 1.38 ± 0.10** > 0.71 ± 0.04** 188.92
PD/CW 0.87 ± 0.9E−4** > 0.78 ± 0.06** 44.34 1.01 ± 0.06** > 0.80 ± 0.04** 93.25 0.88 ± 0.06** > 0.80 ± 0.05** 34.68
PL/CW 2.39 ± 2.0E−4** < 2.55 ± 0.20** −23.85 2.18 ± 0.12** < 2.57 ± 0.13** −69.27 2.56 ± 0.17** < 2.58 ± 0.15** −2.80
ML/CW 0.57 ± 0.4E−4** > 0.56 ± 0.04** 5.45 0.54 ± 0.03** < 0.59 ± 0.03** −37.76 0.52 ± 0.03** < 0.59 ± 0.35** −43.23
PW/CW 0.50 ± 0.7E−4** > 0.49 ± 0.04** 9.56 0.50 ± 0.03** > 0.41 ± 0.02** 80.79 0.46 ± 0.03** > 0.41 ± 0.02** 41.98

Notes.

*

Significant difference (P < 0.01)The insertion was also identified as STR expansion.

**

Significant difference (P < 0.001) between sexes within a species.

mean
s.d.
standard deviation
n
number of measured individuals
t
t-value

Based on the discriminant function analysis, all morphometric ratios of S. olivacea, S. tranquebarica (except ML/CW) and S. paramamosain (except 8CW/CW) showed significant variation between sexes. The discriminant functions of all three species are listed in Table 2. All derived functions explaining 100% of the variance had a small lambda (0.012–0.022) and were significant, with P values of less than 0.001 (Table S1). All three functions correctly classified 100% of the 1,800 adults of known sex and had a cross-validation percentage of 100%. The cut-off values of these functions were 0, with >0 = male in S. olivacea and S. paramamosain and >0 = female in S. tranquebarica.

Table 2. Discriminant function of morphometric ratios and correct classification of males and females of each Scylla spp.

Measured morphometric characteristics include carapace width (CW), CW at spine 8 (8CW), internal carapace width (ICW), carapace length (CL), abdomen width (AW), right cheliped’s dactyl length (DL), right chelipeds propodus depth (PD), right cheliped’s propodus width (PW), right cheliped’s propodus length (PL) and right cheliped’s merus length (ML).

Discriminant function Correct classification, cross-validation (%)
Scylla olivacea 100, 100
0.0488CWCW0.071ICWCW0.404CLCW1.006AWCW+0.164DLCW+0.472PDCW+0.224PLCW+0.259MLCW+0.334PWCW
Cut-off value = 0 (>0 = male; <0 = female)
S. tranquebarica 100, 100
0.079ICWCW0.1528CWCW+0.092CLCW+0.926AWCW0.068DLCW0.234PDCW0.249PLCW0.254PWCW
Cut-off value = 0 (>0 = female; <0 = male)
S. paramamosain 100, 100
0.046ICWCW0.074CLCW0.948AWCW+0.099DLCW+0.496PDCW+0.241PLCW+0.05MLCW+0.41PWCW
Cut-off value = 0 (>0 = male; <0 = female)

By analysing the nine morphometric ratios of males and females using DFA, we found that all ratios were significantly important in discerning males whereas all except PD/CW were essential in discerning females of the three Scylla species (Table S1). The derived functions correctly classified 97.4% of the original grouped cases and 97.3% of cross-validated grouped cases in males (Fig. 2, Table 3). The highest species with correct classification was S. olivacea (99.7%). In females, 74.0% of the original grouped cases were correctly classified (73.6% in cross-validated cases) (Fig. 2, Table 3). Unlike in males where all species had a correct classification percentage of above 94%, that of females was high only for S. olivacea (95.3%). The correct classification percentage was lower than 65% for females of S. tranquebarica (62.2%) and S. paramamosain (63.4%). Further, almost all of the misclassified females were between S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain. All morphometric ratios were significantly different in males and females of Scylla (Table S2). Overall, the secondary sexual characteristics and body size dimensions in relation to CW of S. olivacea were greater than that of S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain in both sexes. The CW of S. olivacea was significantly smaller than its 8CW in both males (t899 =  − 29.14; P < 0.001) and females (t899 =  − 16.01; P < 0.001) whereas the opposite, i.e., CW larger than 8CW, was observed in both sexes of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica (S. paramamosain male: t899 = 117.27; P < 0.001; S. paramamosain female: t899 = 83.91; P < 0.001; S. tranquebarica male: t899 = 89.53; P < 0.001; S. tranquebarica female: t899 = 82.81; P < 0.001).

Figure 2. The grouping of Scylla olivacea, S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica based on the two discriminant functions.

Figure 2

The two axes determine the canonical space of the discriminant analysis for (A) males and (B) females of three Scylla species. Group envelopes (ellipses) are centered on the group centroids.

Table 3. Classification results of males and females of Scylla species.

Sex Predicted Group Membership, n (%) Total, n (%) Correct classification, cross-validation (%)
Species S. olivacea S. paramamosain S. tranquebarica
Male Original group S. olivacea 897 (99.7) 3 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 900 (100) 97.4, 97.3
S. paramamosain 1 (0.1) 879 (97.7) 20 (2.2) 900 (100)
S. tranquebarica 3 (0.3) 43 (4.8) 854 (94.9) 900 (100)
Cross-validated S. olivacea 897 (99.7) 3 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 900 (100)
S. paramamosain 1 (0.1) 878 (97.6) 21 (2.3) 900 (100)
S. tranquebarica 3 (0.3) 44 (4.9) 853 (94.8) 900 (100)
Female Original group S. olivacea 858 (95.3) 36 (4.0) 6 (0.7) 900 (100) 74.0, 73.6
S. paramamosain 0 (0.0) 578 (64.2) 322 (35.8) 900 (100)
S. tranquebarica 6 (0.7) 333 (37.0) 561 (62.3) 900 (100)
Cross-validated S. olivacea 857 (95.2) 37 (4.1) 6 (0.7) 900 (100)
S. paramamosain 0 (0.0) 571 (63.4) 329 (36.6) 900 (100)
S. tranquebarica 6 (0.7) 334 (37.1) 560 (62.2) 900 (100)

Discussion

Within the infraorder Brachyura, males often exhibit larger body size dimensions than females in most species, including the three species of the genus Scylla as shown in this study. The larger body size of males may be linked to the role it plays during the mating process (Hartnoll, 1969). Mating in portunid crabs, including in Scylla spp., involves an intermoult male and a newly-moulted female (Waiho et al., 2015). After mating, the male often engaged in post-copulatory guarding to safeguard the newly-mated female while her carapace hardens (Waiho et al., 2015). In a recent assortative mating experiment conducted on three Scylla species (S. olivacea, S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain), all males in mating pairs were larger than their female counterparts (Fazhan et al., 2017b). It is postulated that smaller females might be easier for males to cradle during pre-copulatory and post-copulatory guarding periods, and facilitate easier copulation as males need to flip over the females in order to copulate. Thus, the results of our study on three species of the genus Scylla are in accordance with the notion that Portunids follow the classic sexual dimorphism pattern, with males larger than females (Doi et al., 2008; Nordhaus, Diele & Wolff, 2009).

In addition to body size dimensions, sexual dimorphism in the secondary sexual characteristics of Scylla is prominent during the adult stage. Changes in the overall dimension of AW in Scylla females once they reach sexual maturity, i.e., become more globular and dark in color, are expected and has been used as a key factor to determine size at sexual maturity in wild populations of Scylla spp. (Overton & Macintosh, 2002; Waiho et al., 2016) and other brachyuran species (Mura, Orrù & Cau, 2005; Williner et al., 2014; Öndes, Kaiser & Murray, 2017). Unlike females, the AW of males retains almost the same colouration and shape since juvenile stages (Waiho, Fazhan & Ikhwanuddin, 2016). Variation in AW between sexes is common in most brachyuran species (Haefner Jr, 1990; Josileen, 2011; Davanso et al., 2016; Öndes, Kaiser & Murray, 2017). The broadening of the abdomen in Scylla females occurs when they reach sexual maturity (Waiho et al., 2016) and is linked with reproductive functions such as attachment of eggs and incubation. Wider abdomens in females often indicate larger egg mass, thus capable of producing more larvae (Crawford & De Smidt, 1922). In contrast, the shape of the abdomen in males maintains as they grow since its main function is to protect the copulatory organ called the gonopods (Hartnoll, 1982).

For most cheliped dimensions, males of all three Scylla spp. showed significantly larger values than females. Similar male-biased dimorphism in cheliped dimensions was also reported in other decapod crustaceans, such as lobsters (Claverie & Smith, 2010; Lezcano et al., 2015) and shrimps (Mashiko, 1981; Mantel & Dudgeon, 2005). In Scylla, apart from body size dimensions, cheliped size is also postulated to play a significant role in female courting and settling a fight during mate guarding (Waiho et al., 2015). Unlike females, males are required to fight and fence off rivals during copulatory guarding. Thus, the larger cheliped size of males is advantageous, both as a courting aid and also a fighting tool.

All measured morphological characteristics showed similar patterns in all three Scylla species, except for 8CW. When compared with CW, the 8CW of S. olivacea was similar or greater than its CW in both males and females. In contrast, the CWs of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica were always greater than their 8CWs. The evolution of body sizes is often species-related and the divergence of specific body forms may be linked to their different habitat and ecology (Overton & Macintosh, 2002). Based on the results of this study, we postulate that the smaller CW compared to 8CW in S. olivacea might be attributed to the microhabitat they live in. Scylla olivacea is known to inhabit mangrove forests at the upper intertidal zones (Fazhan et al., 2017a). Therefore, their less spiny features (Overton & Macintosh, 2002), and smaller CW (body size) probably allow easier burrowing into the substrate and movement within the mangrove root system. On the other hand, S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica are found in estuaries and subtidal zones (Keenan, Davie & Mann, 1998; Fazhan et al., 2017a). The pronounced body spines, including larger body size or CW over 8CW of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica perhaps function as weapons to protect them against predators in the open waters.

Inter-species variation in all measured morphometric ratios was significant, especially in males as the discriminant functions incorporating all morphometric ratios could correctly differentiate among species up to 94%. In females, however, the discriminant functions could correctly classify only the S. olivacea species to a high rate (95.3%) while the correct classification percentage for the females of the other two species were below 65%. This strongly indicates that morphometric characteristics varied greatly only among males of these three Scylla species, but less prominent between the females of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica. Cheliped dimensions of brachyuran crabs are often male-biased and significant variation exists among males of different populations or congeneric males (Lezcano et al., 2012; Kalate et al., 2018). However, unlike males, the sexual dimorphic traits in brachyuran females such as cheliped dimensions are more subtle, especially among congenerics (Silva, Mesquita & Paula, 2010). The inclusion of other measurable body traits in the future, such as frontal lobe and sternum measurements (Keenan, Davie & Mann, 1998; Fazhan et al., 2020), might aid in distinguishing between females of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica. Another possible reason for the lack of variation between the females of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica is the method employed in this study, i.e., traditional morphometric technique. Kalate et al. (2018) demonstrated that the carapace features of freshwater crab Potamon elbursi Pretzmann, 1962 females among two populations were significantly distinct via geometric morphometry—a geometric method based on the multivariate space of biological shapes (Thompson & Bonner, 1917), but not traditional morphometry. Future research could employ both traditional morphometric and geometry morphometric approaches in attempt to identify morphometric traits that might be useful in discerning the females of congeneric Scylla species. Finally, various factors within an ecological niche, such as food availability, water depth and temperature are known to influence morphometric variations of crabs (Giri & Anna, 2008; Torres, Collins & Giri, 2014; Kalate et al., 2018). Thus, the similarities between females of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica could also be attributed to their adaptation to the same microhabitats—estuarines—whereas that of S. olivacea prefer upper river mouths with lower salinity (Fazhan et al., 2020; Fazhan et al., 2021).

All morphometric characteristics contribute significantly to the discriminant models of all three Scylla species, except for ML (for S. tranquebarica) and 8CW (for S. paramamosain). This indicates that all measured morphometric characteristics exhibited gender dimorphism, although not as pronounced in the ML of S. tranquebarica and the 8CW of S. paramamosain. Discriminant models have been widely used in the differentiation and selection of livestock (Leotta, 2004; Purzyc, Kobryńczuk & Bojarski, 2011; Assamoah-Boaheng & Sam, 2016) and fish stock (Cadrin, 2000; Khemiri et al., 2018). The discriminant functions made available in this study would be useful in assessing, managing and conserving different mud crab populations that are living in sympatry. Further, phenotypically pure local genetic resources would be easily selected for future breeding improvement purposes.

Conclusions

The morphometric results of the present study show that distinct morphometric variation was observed between males and females of Scylla spp. and highlight the influence of sexual dimorphism on their external morphologies. The morphometric variations of the secondary sexual characteristics between sexes are associated with reproduction and reveal the different functions of the same body structure in males and females of Scylla spp. The similarity in sexually dimorphic traits among Scylla species further supports the influence of sexual selection on the development of secondary sexual characteristics in this genus. Based on the results of DFA, the significant morphometric variations among congeneric males of the three Scylla species, but less prominent variations among the females of S. paramamosain and S. tranquebarica imply that morphological variations in Scylla might be influenced by both gender and environmental conditions. Future comparative behavioural studies could elucidate the adaptive functions of secondary sexual characteristics between sexes among species of this genus.

Supplemental Information

Data S1. Measurement data for Scylla olivacea, S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-1
Table S1. The eigenvalues and Wilks’ lamda test for the derived discriminant functions of three Scylla species.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-2
Table S2. One-Way ANOVA and Games-Howell test in males and females of Scylla.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-3

Acknowledgments

We thank Yong Sui Sien, Khor Yip Mau and Noraidah Omar for their aid during mud crab sampling.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) program (Vot. No.66955). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Khor Waiho, Email: waiho@umt.edu.my, waihokhor@gmail.com.

Mhd Ikhwanuddin, Email: ikhwanuddin@umt.edu.my.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Hanafiah Fazhan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Khor Waiho conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Yushinta Fujaya, Nita Rukminasari and Hongyu Ma analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Mhd Ikhwanuddin conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Abelló, Pertierra & Reid (1990).Abelló P, Pertierra JP, Reid DG. Sexual size dimorphism, relative growth and handedness in Liocarcinus depurator and Macropipus tuberculatus (Brachyura: Portunidae) Scientia Marina. 1990;54:195–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Accioly et al. (2013).Accioly IV, Lima-Filho PA, Santos TL, Barbosa ACA, Santos Campos LB, Souza JV, Araujo WC, Molina WF. Sexual dimorphism in Litopenaeus vannamei (Decapoda) identified by geometric morphometrics. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences. 2013;8:276–281. [Google Scholar]
  • Alencar et al. (2014).Alencar CERD, Lima-Filho PA, Molina WF, Freire FAM. Sexual shape dimorphism of the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Decapoda, Ucididae) accessed through geometric morphometric. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:206168. doi: 10.1155/2014/206168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson (1994).Anderson M. Sexual selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Assamoah-Boaheng & Sam (2016).Assamoah-Boaheng M, Sam EK. Morphological characterization of breeds of sheep: a discriminant analysis approach. SpringerPlus. 2016;5:69. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1669-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barría et al. (2014).Barría EM, Santos S, Jara CG, Butler CJ. Sexual dimorphism in the cephalothorax of freshwater crabs of genus Aegla Leach from Chile (Decapoda, Anomura, Aeglidae): an interspecific approach based on distance variables. Zoomorphology. 2014;133:379–389. doi: 10.1007/s00435-014-0231-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bertin et al. (2002).Bertin A, David B, Cézilly F, Alibert P. Quantification of sexual dimorphism in Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda) using outline approaches. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2002;77:523–533. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00125.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bildstein, McDowell & Brisbin (1989).Bildstein KL, McDowell SG, Brisbin IL. Consequences of sexual dimorphism in sand fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator: differential vulnerability to avian predation. Animal Behavior. 1989;37:133–139. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90013-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bissaro, Gomes-Jr & Di Beneditto (2012).Bissaro FG, Gomes-Jr JL, Di Beneditto APM. Morphometric variation in the shape of the cephalothorax of shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri on the east coast of Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2012;93:683–691. [Google Scholar]
  • Brockerhoff & McLay (2005).Brockerhoff AM, McLay CL. Factors influencing the onset and duration of receptivity of female purple rock crabs, Hemigrapsus sexdentatus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) (Brachyura: Grapsidae) Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2005;314:123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadrin (2000).Cadrin SX. Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2000;10:91–112. doi: 10.1023/A:1008939104413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Christodoulou & Anastasiadou (2017).Christodoulou M, Anastasiadou C. Sexual dimorphism in the shrimp genus Atyaephyra De Brito, 1867 (Caridea: Atyidae): the case study of Atyaephyra thyamisensis Christodoulou, Antoniou, Magoulas & Koukouras, 2012. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2017;37:588–601. doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/rux062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Claverie & Smith (2010).Claverie T, Smith I. Allometry and sexual dimorphism in the chela shape in the squat lobster Munida rugosa. Aquatic Biology. 2010;8:179–187. doi: 10.3354/ab00233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Crawford & De Smidt (1922).Crawford DR, De Smidt WJJ. The spiny lobster, Panulirus argus, of southern Florida: its natural history and utilization. Fishery Bulletin. 1922;38:281–310. [Google Scholar]
  • Davanso et al. (2016).Davanso TM, Taddei FG, Hirose GL, Da Costa RC. Sexual maturity, handedness and sexual dimorphism of the freshwater crab Dilocarcinus pagei in Sourheastern Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca. 2016;42:269–279. doi: 10.20950/1678-2305.2016v42n2p269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • De Camargo & De Oliveira (2012).De Camargo NF, De Oliveira HFM. Sexual dimorphism in Sturnira lilium (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): can pregnancy and pup carrying be responsible for differences in wing shape? PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e49734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dechaume-Moncharmont, Monceau & Cezilly (2011).Dechaume-Moncharmont F-X, Monceau K, Cezilly F. Sexing birds using discriminant function analysis: a critical appraisal. The Auk. 2011;128:78–86. doi: 10.1525/auk.2011.10129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Doi et al. (2008).Doi W, Yokota M, Strüssmann CA, Watanabe S. Growth and reproduction of the portunid crab Charybdis bimaculate (Decapoda: Brachyura) in Tokyo Bay. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2008;28:641–651. doi: 10.1651/07-2964.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Estampador (1949).Estampador E. Studies on Scylla (Crustacea: Portunidae) I. Revision of the genus. Philippine Journal of Science. 1949;78:95–109. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO (2020).FAO Species fact sheets: Scylla serrata. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2020. http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/2637/en http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/2637/en
  • Fazhan et al. (2021).Fazhan H, Waiho K, Al-Hafiz I, Kasan NA, Ishak SD, Afiqah-Aleng N, Tola S, Ikhwanuddin M. Composition, size distribution, length-weight relationship of sympatric mud crab species (Scylla) and the case of presumed hybrids. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2021;250:107154. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fazhan et al. (2017a).Fazhan H, Waiho K, Darin Azri MF, Al-Hafiz I, Wan Norfaizza WI, Megat FH, Jasmani S, Ma H, Ikhwanuddin M. Sympatric occurrence and population dynamics of Scylla spp. in equatorial climate: Effects of rainfall, temperature and lunar phase. Estuar. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2017a;198:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fazhan et al. (2020).Fazhan H, Waiho K, Quinitio E, Baylon JC, Fujaya Y, Rukminasari N, Darin Azri MF, Shahreza MS, Ma H, Ikhwanuddin M. Morphological descriptions and morphometric discriminant function analysis reveal an additional four groups of Scylla spp. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8066. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fazhan et al. (2017b).Fazhan H, Waiho K, Wan Norfaizza WI, Megat FH, Ikhwanuddin M. Assortative mating by size in three species of mud crabs, genus Scylla De Haan, 1833 (Brachyura: Portunidae) Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2017b;37:654–660. doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/rux063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrer et al. (2016).Ferrer M, Morandini V, Perry L, Bechard M. Sex determination by morphological measurements of black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys) using discriminant analysis. Waterbirds. 2016;39:295–299. doi: 10.1675/063.039.0309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Giraldes et al. (2016).Giraldes BW, Al-Maslamani I, Al-Ashwel A, Chatting M, Smyth D. Basic assessment of Portunus segnis (Forskål, 1775)—a baseline for stock management in the Western Arabian Gulf. Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 2016;42:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ejar.2016.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Giri & Anna (2008).Giri F, Anna L. Size and shape variation of two freshwater crabs in Argentinean Patagonia: the influence of sexual dimorphism, habitat, and species interactions. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2008;28:37–45. doi: 10.1651/07-2824R.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Glucksmann (1974).Glucksmann A. Sexual dimorphism in mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1974;49:423–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1974.tb01171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haefner Jr (1990).Haefner Jr PA. Morphometry and size at maturity of Callinectes ornatus (Brachyura, Portunidae) in Bermuda. Bulletin of Marine Science. 1990;46:274–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartnoll (1969).Hartnoll RG. Mating in the Brachyura. Crustaceana. 1969;16:161–181. doi: 10.1163/156854069X00420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartnoll (1982).Hartnoll RG. In: Growth in the biology of crustacea. 2, embryology, morphology, and genetics. Bliss DE, Abele LG, editors. New York: Academic Press; 1982. pp. 111–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartnoll (2006).Hartnoll RG. Reproductive investment in Brachyura. Hydrobiologia. 2006;557:31–40. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-9305-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jaiswara, Nandi & Balakrishnan (2013).Jaiswara R, Nandi D, Balakrishnan R. Examining the effectiveness of discriminant function analysis and cluster analysis in species identification of male field crickets based on their calling songs. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e75930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson (2003).Johnson PTJ. Biased sex ratios in fiddler crabs (Brachyura, Ocypodidae): a review and evaluation of the influence on sampling method, size class, and sex-specific mortality. Crustaceana. 2003;76:559–580. doi: 10.1163/156854003322316209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones & Ratterman (2009).Jones AG, Ratterman NL. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:10001–10008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901129106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Josileen (2011).Josileen J. Morphometrics and length-weight relationship in the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (decapoda, Brachyura) from the Mandapam coast, India. Crustaceana. 2011;84:1665–1681. doi: 10.1163/156854011X607060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalate et al. (2018).Kalate A, Keikhosravi A, Naderloo R, Hajjar T, Schubart CD. Morphometric characterization of the freshwater crab Potamon elbursi Pretzmann, 1962 in the Caspian Sea and Namak Lake hydrographic systems. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2018;38:91–100. doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/rux090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kawane et al. (2012).Kawane M, Miura T, Wada K, Umemoto A. Genetic population structure and life history characteristics of the rare brackish-water crab Deiratonotus kaoriae Miura, Kawane and Wada, 2007 (Brachyura: Camptandriidae) in western Japan. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2012;32:119–125. doi: 10.1163/193724011X615398. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Keenan, Davie & Mann (1998).Keenan CP, Davie P, Mann D. A revision of the genus Scylla De Haan, 1833 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Portunidae) The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 1998;46:217–245. [Google Scholar]
  • Khemiri et al. (2018).Khemiri S, Gaamour A, Abdallah LB, Fezzani S. The use of otolith shape to determine stock structure of Engraulis encrasicolus along the Tunisian coast. Hydrobiologia. 2018;821:73–82. doi: 10.1007/s10750-017-3305-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Leotta (2004).Leotta R. Use of linear discriminant analysis to characterise three dairy cattle breeds on the basis of several milk characteristics. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2004;3:377–383. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2004.377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lezcano et al. (2012).Lezcano AH, González-José R, Spivak ED, Dellatorre FG. Geographic differences in the carapace shape of the crab Cyrtograpsus affinis (Decapoda: Varunidae) and its taxonomic implications. Scientia Marina. 2012;76:329–337. doi: 10.3989/scimar.03391.16A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lezcano et al. (2015).Lezcano AH, Penna MA, Márquez F, Thiel M. Variation in cheliped form in two species of squat lobsters (Decapoda: Anomura) from Chile. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography. 2015;63:303–310. doi: 10.1590/S1679-87592015088006303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mantel & Dudgeon (2005).Mantel SK, Dudgeon D. Reproduction and sexual dimorphism of the Paleomonid shrimp Macrobrachium hainanense in Hong Kong streams. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2005;25:450–459. doi: 10.1651/C-2541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Marochi et al. (2019).Marochi MZ, Costa M, Daldin Leite R, Da Cruz IDC, Masunari S. To grow or to reproduce? Sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic allometry in two Sesarmidae species (Crustacea: Brachyura) Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2019;99:473–486. doi: 10.1017/S0025315418000048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mashiko (1981).Mashiko K. Sexual dimorphism of the cheliped in the prawn Macrobrachium nipponense (de Haan) and its significance in reproductive behavior. Zoological Magazine. 1981;90:333–337. [Google Scholar]
  • McGrath & Hilton (2012).McGrath PE, Hilton EJ. Sexual dimorphism in longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Journal of Fish Biology. 2012;80:335–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mei & Gui (2015).Mei J, Gui JF. Genetic basis and biotechnological manipulation of sexual dimorphism and sex determination in fish. Science China Life Sciences. 2015;58:124–136. doi: 10.1007/s11427-014-4797-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mura, Orrù & Cau (2005).Mura M, Orrù F, Cau A. Size at sexual maturity of the spider crab Anamathia rissoana (Decapoda: Majoidea) from the Sardinian Sea. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2005;25:110–115. doi: 10.1651/C-2520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakayama & Wada (2015).Nakayama M, Wada K. Effect of size on fighting and mating in a brachyuran crab with female-biased size dimorphism, Ilyograpsus nodulosus (Macrophthalmidae) Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2015;35:763–767. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Niemc et al. (2018).Niemc A, Remisiewicz M, Avni J, Underhill LG. Sexual dimorphism in adult Little Stints (Calidris minuta) revealed by DNA sexing and discriminant analysis. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5367. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nordhaus, Diele & Wolff (2009).Nordhaus I, Diele K, Wolff M. Activity patterns, feeding and burrowing behaviour of the crab Ucides cordatus (Ucididae) in a high intertidal mangrove forest in North Brazil. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2009;374:104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Öndes, Kaiser & Murray (2017).Öndes F, Kaiser MJ, Murray LG. Relative growth and size at onset of sexual maturity of the brown crab, Cancer pagurus in the Isle of Man, Irish Sea. Marine Biology Research. 2017;13:237–245. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2016.1248849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Overton & Macintosh (2002).Overton JL, Macintosh DJ. Estimated size at sexual maturity for female mud crabs (Genus Scylla) from two sympatric species within Ban Don Bay, Thailand. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2002;22:790–797. doi: 10.1163/20021975-99990293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Parvizi et al. (2017).Parvizi E, Naderloo R, Keikhosravi A, Schubart CD. Life history traits and patterns of sexual dimorphism in the freshwater crab Potamon ibericum (Bieberstein, 1809) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Potamidae) from the western Alborz Mountains, Iran. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2017;37:323–331. doi: 10.1093/jcbiol/rux029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Purzyc, Kobryńczuk & Bojarski (2011).Purzyc H, Kobryńczuk F, Bojarski J. Sexual dimorphism in Hucul horses using discriminant analysis. Animal. 2011;5:506–511. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110002223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reading & Backwell (2007).Reading KL, Backwell PRY. Can beggers be choosers? Male mate choice in a fiddler crab. Animal Behavior. 2007;74:867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Roth & Mercer (2000).Roth VL, Mercer JM. Morphometrics in development and evolution. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 2000;40:801–810. [Google Scholar]
  • Rufino, Abelló & Yule (2004).Rufino MM, Abelló P, Yule AB. Male and female carapace shape differences in Liocarcinus depurator (Decapoda, Brachyura): an application of geometric morphometric analysis to crustaceans. Italian Journal of Zoology. 2004;71:79–83. doi: 10.1080/11250000409356554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Serene (1952).Serene R. Les especes du genere Scylla a Nhatrang (Vietnam). Proceedings of Indo-Pacific Fisheries Council. Third meeting, Madras.1952. pp. 113–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Sganga, Piana & López Greco (2016).Sganga DE, Piana LRF, López Greco LS. Sexual dimorphism in a freshwater atyid shrimp (Decapoda: Caridea) with direct development: a geometric morphometrics approach. Zootaxa. 2016;4196:120–128. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4196.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi et al. (2019).Shi X, Lu J, Wu Q, Waiho K, Aweya JJ, Fazhan H, Zhang Y, Li S, Zheng H, Lin F, You C, Ikhwanuddin M, Ma H. Comparative analysis of growth performance between female and male mud crab Scylla paramamosain crablets: Evidences from a four-month successive growth experiment. Aquaculture. 2019;505:351–362. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva, Mesquita & Paula (2010).Silva IC, Mesquita N, Paula J. Lack of population structure in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes along an East African latitudinal gradient: genetic and morphometric evidence. Marine Biology. 2010;157:1113–1126. doi: 10.1007/s00227-010-1393-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Simpson, Ambrosio & Baeza (2016).Simpson LA, Ambrosio LJ, Baeza JA. Sexual dimorphism and allometric growth in the enigmatic pygmy crab Petramithrax pygmaeus (Bell, 1836) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Mithracidae), with a formal test of Rensch’s rule in spider crabs (Superfamily Majoidea) Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2016;36:792–803. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Spivak & Schubart (2003).Spivak ED, Schubart CD. Species status in question: a morphometric and molecular comparison of Cyrtograpsus affinis and C. altimanus (Decapoda, Brachyura, Varunidae) Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2003;23:212–222. doi: 10.1163/20021975-99990328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Stephenson & Campbell (1960).Stephenson W, Campbell B. The Australian portunids (Crustacea: Portunidae) IV: remaining genera. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 1960;11:73–112. doi: 10.1071/MF9600073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Tang et al. (2020).Tang L, Wang H, Wang C, Mu C, Wei H, Yao H, Ye C, Chen L, Shi C. Temperature potentially induced distinctive flavor of mud crab Scylla paramamosain mediated by gut microbiota. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:3720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60685-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson & Bonner (1917).Thompson D, Bonner J. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 1917. [Google Scholar]
  • Tina, Jaroensutasinne & Jaroensutasinee (2015).Tina FW, Jaroensutasinne M, Jaroensutasinee K. Effects of sexual dimorphism and body size on feeding behavior of the fiddler crab, Uca Bengali Crane, 1975. Crustaceana. 2015;88:231–242. doi: 10.1163/15685403-00003405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Torres, Collins & Giri (2014).Torres MV, Collins PA, Giri F. Morphological variation of freshwater crabs Zilchiopsis collastinensis and Trichodactylus borellianus (Decapoda, Trichodactylidae) among localities from the middle Paraná River basin during different hydrological periods. ZooKeys. 2014;457:171–186. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.457.6726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho et al. (2016).Waiho K, Fazhan H, Baylon JC, Wan Norfaizza WI, Ikhwanuddin M. Use of abdomen looseness as an indicator of sexual maturity in male mud crab Scylla spp. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2016;35:1027–1035. doi: 10.2983/035.035.0425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho et al. (2017).Waiho K, Fazhan H, Glenner H, Ikhwanuddin M. Infestation of parasitic rhizocephalan barnacles Sacculina beauforti (Cirripedia, Rhizocephala) in edible mud crab, Scylla olivacea. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3419. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho, Fazhan & Ikhwanuddin (2016).Waiho K, Fazhan H, Ikhwanuddin M. Size distribution, length-weight relationship and size at the onset of sexual maturity of the orange mud crab, Scylla olivacea, in Malaysian waters. Marine Biology Research. 2016;12:726–738. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2016.1200726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho et al. (2018).Waiho K, Fazhan H, Quinition ET, Baylon JC, Fujaya Y, Azmie G, Wu Q, Shi X, Ikhwanuddin M, Ma H. Larval rearing of mud crab (Scylla): what lies ahead. Aquaculture. 2018;493:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.04.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho et al. (2015).Waiho K, Mustaqim M, Fazhan H, Wan Norfaizza WI, Megat FH, Ikhwanuddin M. Mating behaviour of the orange mud crab, Scylla olivacea: The effect of sex ratio and stocking density on mating success. Aquaculture Reports. 2015;2:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Waiho et al. (2019).Waiho K, Shi X, Fazhan H, Li S, Zhang Y, Zheng H, Liu W, Fang S, Ikhwanuddin M, Ma H. High-density genetic linkage maps provide novel insights into ZW/ZZ sex determination system and growth performance in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:298. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williner et al. (2014).Williner V, Torres MV, Carvalho DA, König N. Relative growth and morphological sexual maturity size of the freshwater crab Trichodactylus borellianus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Trichodactylidae) in the Middle Paraná River, Argentina. ZooKeys. 2014;457:159–170. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.457.6821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wyman, Stinchcombe & Rowe (2013).Wyman MJ, Stinchcombe JR, Rowe L. A multivariate view of the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013;26:2070–2080. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1. Measurement data for Scylla olivacea, S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-1
Table S1. The eigenvalues and Wilks’ lamda test for the derived discriminant functions of three Scylla species.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-2
Table S2. One-Way ANOVA and Games-Howell test in males and females of Scylla.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10936/supp-3

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

All raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES