Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 Feb 2;27(17):5344–5378. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004375

Isoindolinone Synthesis via One‐Pot Type Transition Metal Catalyzed C−C Bond Forming Reactions

Risto Savela 1,, Carolina Méndez‐Gálvez 1
PMCID: PMC8048987  PMID: 33125790

Abstract

Isoindolinone structure is an important privileged scaffold found in a large variety of naturally occurring as well as synthetic, biologically and pharmaceutically active compounds. Owing to its crucial role in a number of applications, the synthetic methodologies for accessing this heterocyclic skeleton have received significant attention during the past decade. In general, the synthetic strategies can be divided into two categories: First, direct utilization of phthalimides or phthalimidines as starting materials for the synthesis of isoindolinones; and second, construction of the lactam and/or aromatic rings by different catalytic methods, including C−H activation, cross‐coupling, carbonylation, condensation, addition and formal cycloaddition reactions. Especially in the last mentioned, utilization of transition metal catalysts provides access to a broad range of substituted isoindolinones. Herein, the recent advances (2010–2020) in transition metal catalyzed synthetic methodologies via formation of new C−C bonds for isoindolinones are reviewed.

Keywords: catalysis, heterocycles, isoindolinone, synthesis, transition metals


Isoindolinone motif can found in a large variety biologically and pharmaceutically active compounds. Due to the central role in a number of applications, the synthetic methodologies for accessing this heterocyclic skeleton have received significant attention during the past decade. Herein, the recent advances (2010–2020) in transition metal catalyzed synthetic methodologies via formation of new C−C bonds for isoindolinones are reviewed.

graphic file with name CHEM-27-5344-g053.jpg

Introduction

Isoindolinone scaffold is a structural motif found in a large variety of naturally occurring, as well as synthetic, biologically and pharmaceutically active compounds, as illustrated in Figure 1. Examples of the biological activities possessed by such compounds include antimicrobial, [1] antioxidant, [2] antifungal, [3] antiparkinsons, [4] anti‐inflammatory, [5] antipsychotic, [6] antihypertensive, [7] anesthetic, [8] vasodilatory, [9] anxiolytic, [10] antiviral, [11] anticancer, [12] selective NaV1.7 blocking [13] and survival motor neuron protein production regulating [14] activities. For example, lenalidomide, pagoclone and pazinaclone are clinically utilized pharmaceuticals. Isoindolinone derivatives also serve as important key intermediates for a number of highly useful organic compounds and natural products, but to obtain the prerequisite isoindolinone derivative have often required multistep synthesis strategies.[ 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Examples of biologically active isoindolinone derivatives.

A common strategy has been, and still is, based on functionalization of phthalimides or phthalimidines to synthesize the desired isoindolinone derivative. [16] While this strategy does facilitate the access to diversely decorated isoindolinones, it can require multistep methodologies to achieve the target compound. During the past decade, a variety of catalytic methodologies have been investigated in order to minimize the number of reaction steps and to maximize the direct utilization of commercially available compounds for the synthesis of isoindolinone based structures. [17] Especially transition‐metal catalyzed C−C bond formation with subsequent lactamization have provided simplified access to a large variety of isoindolinone derivatives. These reactions involve the use of C−H activation, carbonylation, cross‐coupling, addition, condensation, formal cycloaddition and annulation based strategies. In this minireview, we highlight the advances made during the past ten years in transition‐metal catalyzed C−C bond forming reactions applying one‐pot type strategies for isoindolinone synthesis.

C−H Functionalization: Annulation/Cyclization

In general, the covalent bond between carbon and hydrogen (C−H) is considered fairly inert and the activation of this bond for modification has remained as a significant challenge to synthetic chemists. Thus, the C−H bond catalytic activation can be considered as one of the most important areas of modern synthetic chemistry due to its wide potential in various applications in both industrial and academic settings. In recent years, significant improvements in the synthesis of N‐heterocyclic compounds by C−H bond functionalization/activation have been made. [18] A common feature in most of the methods utilizing C−H functionalization strategies for isoindolinone synthesis is the use of N‐substituted benzamides as reactants bearing either activating or directing groups. Most commonly featured groups consist from: p‐toluene sulfonate (Ts), methyl sulfonate (Ms), different alkoxides, 8‐quinoline (Q), 2‐pyridine or 2‐pyridine oxide and acetate (OAc) or pivalate (OPiv) moieties. In the following discussion, the different reactions forming isoindolinones via C−H functionalization are classified according to the transition metal used as the catalyst.

Palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization

Pd‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation‐cyclization

Both Zhu [19] and Youn [20] have described the oxidative synthesis of isoindolinones using tosylated benzamides with a variety on alkene reactants and either palladium(II) acetate and palladium(II) trifluoracetate as catalysts (Scheme 1; Zhu: A and B; Youn: C). These methods utilize pure oxygen atmosphere or air as the oxidant but the method presented by Youn requires copper(II) acetate to oxidize the palladium catalyst as a part of the catalytic cycle. In general, these methodologies provide moderate to high yields for most reactant combinations but significant steric hindrance close to the reaction site seems to lower the yield of the reaction.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization of tosylated benzamides.

A number of isoindolinone derivatives were prepared from N‐methoxy derivatized benzamides with alkenes by Li, [21] Wrigglesworth, [22] and Hii. [23] (Scheme 2 A, B and C, respectively). Li and co‐workers utilized p‐benzoquinone (BQ) as the oxidant and Wrigglesworth and co‐workers a combination of BQ and oxygen. The ortho‐substituted benzamides and electron withdrawing substituents in general resulted in significant decrease in the isolated yields. Due to the genotoxic nature of p‐benzoquinone, the group of Hii applied a combination of copper(II) acetate/O2 as a suitable alternative, yielding 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones in good yields. Here, only the use of trifluoromethyl substituents was reported to drastically decrease the yield. Later, Laha [24] described a similar method using underivatized benzamides with stoichiometric amount of copper(II) acetate as the oxidant and dioxane as solvent instead of acetic acid (Scheme 2 D).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Oxidative C−H functionalization of benzamides with various alkenes.

Carboxylic acid derivatives have also found utility as reactants in palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization of derivatized benzamides. Wie [25] described a redox‐neutral C−H functionalization strategy between 8‐quinoline derivatized benzamides and carboxylic acids or carboxylic acid anhydrides (Scheme 3). In this manner, a broad range of 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones were synthesized in moderate to good yields.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Decarboxylative strategies for synthesis of isoindolinones via palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Pd‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

Dai and Yu [26] utilized Pd2(dba)3 as a catalyst to synthesize 3‐imino‐isoindolinones in good yields from tert‐butylisocyanides and N‐methoxy benzamides using air as the oxidant. The methodology was able to overcome catalyst deactivation commonly associated with heterocycles in C−H activation and produce 3‐imino‐isoindolinones with heterocyclic substituents (Scheme 4 A). Interestingly, an unexpected reversal of the positions of the methoxy and tert‐butyl groups takes place with this catalytic system. Also, Wei and Qian [27] utilized isocyanide derivatives in a similar manner but under oxygen atmosphere. Here, both methoxy and pentafluorobenzene based directing/activating groups (R3 in Scheme 4 B) could be utilized with either tert‐butyl‐ or isopropylisocyanides.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Use of isocyanides in palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Pd‐catalyzed cyclization using acyl radicals

Similarly to alkenes, aldehydes have also been found as useful substrates for isoindolinone synthesis. Zhao and Huang [28] successfully utilized a variety of aldehydes together with N‐derivatized benzamides for synthesis of 3‐hydroxyisoindolinones using aqueous tert‐butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) as an oxidant (Scheme 5 A). The group of Zhang [29] described a similar methodology, but in this context, the aldehydes utilized in the reaction were generated by in situ oxidation of the toluene derivatives (Scheme 5 B). This methodology was further implemented to functionalization of 4H‐Benzo[d][1,3]oxazin‐4‐ones to fused tetracyclic compounds containing the isoindolinone moiety by Kumar et al. [30] (Scheme 5 C).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Aldehydes as substrates for the synthesis of isoindolinones via palladium catalyzed C−H activation.

Both Li [31] and Wang [32] utilized a decarboxylation based methodology for the synthesis of 3‐hydroxy‐isoindolinone and fused tricyclic isoindolinone derivatives, respectively (Scheme 6 A and B). Both methodologies were applied for broad range of substrates and were able to proceed under air utilizing persulfates as oxidants. In general, substituents at meta‐position (Scheme 6. R1, R2 or R3) resulted in diminished yields.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Decarboxylative strategies for synthesis of isoindolinones via palladium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Rhodium catalyzed C−H functionalization

Rh‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation‐cyclization

Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl rhodium dichloride dimer ([RhCp*Cl2]2) has found widespread utility in the synthesis of diversely substituted isoindolinones via the RhIII‐catalyzed aryl C−H olefination reactions. Both Li [33] and Glorius [34] described an oxidative C−H olefination using unactivated or underivatized benzamides. Both methods proceed with electron deficient olefins in the presence of a suitable oxidant, such as silver carbonate or copper(II) acetate (Scheme 7; Li: A and Glorius: B). Instead of stoichiometric oxidants, Lu et al. [35] were able to utilize the oxygen present in air to synthesize 3‐substituted isoindolinones from electron deficient olefins and N‐pentafluorobenzene derivatized benzamides (Scheme 7 C).

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

RhIII‐catalyzed aryl C−H olefination reactions.

Qin [36] used an oxidative coupling strategy to provide access to ethane sulfonylfluoride derivatized isoindolinones from N‐methoxy substituted benzamides and ethene sulfonylfluoride (Scheme 8 A). The sulfonyl fluoride group can be readily utilized for example in a sulfur(VI) fluoride exchange reaction, which is a type of click reaction. Jeganmohan [37] conveyed their previous work with cobalt catalyzed isoindolinone synthesis (vide infra) to similar RhIII catalyzed method. Using maleimides as substrates with N‐methoxy‐benzamides, 3‐spirosubstituted isoindolinones were produced in a facile manner (Scheme 8 B).

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Coupling of methoxy substituted benzamides with alkenes.

Tosyl derivatized benzamides were successfully used in C−H olefination [38a] providing a direct route to 3,3‐disubstituted‐isoindolinones (Scheme 9 A). Initially, in addition to the N‐tosyl benzamides, only 1,2‐homodisubstituted activated alkenes were employed as reactants (Scheme 9 B, C) but later [38b] it was further optimized and expanded to terminal alkenes. The yield of these reactions was mainly dependent of electron withdrawing substituents on the alkene.

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

Synthesis of isoindolinones from N‐tosyl‐derivatized benzamides.

The combination of C−H and C−F bond functionalization utilizing redox neutral bimetallic RhIII/AgI relay catalysis was described by Wang (Scheme 10 A). [39] Here, rhodium was used for C−H functionalization and silver for the defluorinative cyclization to afford 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones, which could further be derivatized for example to aristolactam BII. Similarly Feng and Loh [40] established a purely rhodium catalyzed synthesis of 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones from benzyl gem‐difluoroacrylate and N‐tosyl‐benzamides at room temperature in the presence of an inorganic base and without the need of protective gases (Scheme 10 B). The combination of C−H activation and C−F cleavage was further expanded to gem‐difluoromethylene alkynes with N‐methoxy‐benzamide substrates. [41] It is noteworthy that a reaction proceeded in the non‐halogenated solvent under air and tolerated a broad range of substrates (Scheme 10 C).

Scheme 10.

Scheme 10

Rhodium catalyzed C−H functionalization combined with C−F cleavage.

Liu and Lu [42] described the coupling of α‐allenols and N‐methoxy‐benzamide derivatives in the presence of a rhodium catalyst and silver acetate as the external oxidant, forming 3,3‐disubtituted isoindolinones (Scheme 11 A). In their experiments, it was found that the hydroxyl group, has a significant effect on the chemo‐ and regioselectivity. Similarly, ketimines have been investigated as coupling partners for N‐methoxy‐benzamide derivatives. Lu and Wang [43] described C−H bond activation/annulation cascade forming 3‐aminoisoindolinones and 3‐diarylmethyleneisoindolinones depending on the substituents on the benzamide (Scheme 11 B and C). For example, N‐methoxy‐1‐naphthamides and benzamides bearing bulky substituents at ortho‐position would lead to 3‐diarylmethyleneisoindolinones. Later the diastereoselectivity of this cascade to 3‐aminoisoindolinones was also investigated (Scheme 11 D). [44]

Scheme 11.

Scheme 11

Rhodium catalyzed coupling of α‐allenols and ketimines to N‐methoxy‐benzamide derivatives.

Similarly to allene derivatives, enynes have been successfully coupled with benzohydroxamic acid or N‐methoxy‐benzamide derivatives forming 3,3‐disubstituted isoindolinones. Chang [45] discovered that replacing two methyl groups from Cp* ligand for carboxylic acid ethyl ester would significantly tune the catalyst towards formal [4+1] annulation (Scheme 12 A). By treating N‐pivaloyloxy benzamide with conjugated enynones, a number of isoindolinones could be synthesized with furan substituents on the position C3. An oxidative annulation between enynes and N‐methoxybenzamides was described by Li (Scheme 12 B). [46] Here, combination of copper(II) acetate and air was employed as oxidants in methanol at room temperature forming a variety of 3,3‐disubstituted isoindolinones at good to excellent yields.

Scheme 12.

Scheme 12

Enyne derivatives in the synthesis on isoindolinones.

Propargyl alcohols and propargyl acetates have found utility as C1 synthons in the preparation of isoindolinone derivatives. Liu [47] described the coupling of propargyl alcohol derivatives and N‐ethoxy benzamides with cesium acetate in 1,2‐dichloroethane at elevated temperatures under argon leading to a broad variety of isoindolinones (Scheme 13 A). The ethoxy group utilized as directing group was also removed during the course of the reaction limiting the need for subsequent synthetic operations. Li [48] was able to synthesize similar compounds under air at close to ambient conditions in the presence of silver acetate and silver carbonate (Scheme 13 B). Ma [49] presented an approach to isoindolinone synthesis utilizing propargyl acetates as C1 synthons in aqueous media in the presence of sodium acetate and acetic acid at reflux temperature. Based on experimental evidence, it was proposed that the reaction proceeds via allene intermediate formation followed by cyclization, whereas in the case of propargyl alcohol reactants the reaction would proceed via π‐allylic intermediate.

Scheme 13.

Scheme 13

Propargyl alcohols and propargyl acetates as C1 synthons.

RhIII‐catalyzed three‐component synthesis of isoindolinone frameworks was achieved by both Wang et al. [50] and Zhang et al. [51] Wang used a combination of benzoyl chloride derivative, 2‐aminophenol and electron deficient alkene derivatives to synthesize a variety of substituted isoindolinones in a single step under air (Scheme 14 A). In comparison, Zhang utilized an aromatic aldehyde, 2‐aminopyridines and similarly activated olefins under nitrogen atmosphere, and was able to synthesize pagoclone and pazinaclone in a single step, albeit in 15 % and 20 % isolated yields, respectively (Scheme 14 B). These reactions can be operated using commercially available reactants without the need of significant prior synthetic work. In both cases the amine reactant is selected to function as a directing group for the oxidative rhodium catalyzed C−H activation reaction.

Scheme 14.

Scheme 14

Rhodium catalyzed three‐component synthesis of isoindolinone derivatives.

Yuan et al. [52] reported a redox‐neutral RhIII catalyzed double C−H bond functionalization cascade to produce 3‐spiro substituted isoindolinones from 2,3‐diarylcyclopropenones and benzamide derivatives (Scheme 15). In this manner, two new C−C bonds and one new C−N bond were formed with the indene substituent at C3 position of the isoindolinone skeleton. While this reaction does require elevated temperature and halogenated solvent, it does not need protection from air.

Scheme 15.

Scheme 15

Ketones in rhodium catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones by C−H bond activation.

Rh‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

Zhu reported an oxidative rhodium catalyzed ortho‐C−H activation annulation cascade with isocyanides, producing 3‐iminoisoindolinones (Scheme 16). [53] In their work, the main challenges, in terms of yield, arose from fluoro and trifluoromethyl substituted benzamide derivatives.

Scheme 16.

Scheme 16

Synthesis of isoindolinones from N‐tosyl‐derivatized benzamides and isocyanides.

Rh‐catalyzed cyclization using carbene reagents

The coupling of diazo compounds to benzohydroxamic acid derivatives in RhIII‐catalyzed formal [4+1] cycloaddition proceeding via C−H bond activation forming isoindolinones was demonstrated by both Rovis [54] and Yu. [55] Rovis utilized O‐pivaloyl benzohydroxamic acids with methyl α‐aryldiazoacetates or 1‐aryl‐2,2,2‐trifluoro diazoethanes as carbenoid coupling partners, whereas Yu focused on O‐acetyl benzohydroxamic acids with diazomalonates (Scheme 17 A and B, respectively). The method reported by Rovis proceeded in the presence of substoichiometric amount of base under air while Yu did not need additional base but utilized higher temperature under argon atmosphere. In addition of olefination of tosylated benzamides Zhu [38b] extended the their methodology to encompass diazoacetate reactants instead of alkenes (Scheme 17 C). The yield of these reactions was mainly dependent of electron withdrawing substituents on the alkenes or of steric hindrances present in diazoacetate substrates.

Scheme 17.

Scheme 17

Coupling of diazo compounds with benzohydroxamic acid derivatives and tosylated benzamides.

Cui [56] reported the synthesis of isoindolinones from benzohydroxamic acids and diazo derivatives, generated in situ from ketones in presence of use of hydrazine and manganese oxide (Scheme 18). While in this manner the need to handle and prepare possibly hazardous diazo compounds is limited, the methodology still utilizes highly toxic hydrazine as well as super stoichiometric amount of manganese oxide.

Scheme 18.

Scheme 18

Ketones in rhodium catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones by C−H bond activation.

Rh‐catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of isoindolinones

Since the seminal work on asymmetric arylation of N‐tosylarylimines by Xu and Lin in 2007, [57] only a few examples of asymmetric synthesis of isoindolinones by transition metal catalyzed transformations have been reported. In case of asymmetric rhodium catalyzed C−H functionalization reactions, all of the catalysts described share a common feature of bulky axially chiral substituent, such as 1,1’‐binaphtyl or 1,1’‐spirobiindane derivative, at the Cp ring. Cramer [58] was the first to utilize these types of ligands for rhodium catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of isoindolinone via C−H functionalization reaction. The reactions proceeded under mild conditions and allowed to achieve high enantioselectivities without the need of superstoichiometric amount of additives (Scheme 19 A). This methodology was based on previous work of Rovis [54] utilizing donor/acceptor diazo compounds with O‐pivaloyl benzhydroxamic acids. Based on the work of Loh, [41] Wang [59] reported a solvent‐dependent asymmetric synthesis of alkynyl and monofluoroalkenyl isoindolinones (Scheme 19 B and C). In isobutyronitrile, the monofluoroalkenyl isoindolinones were formed in moderate to good enantioselectivity with predominance of the Z isomer, whereas in methanol the alkynyl derivatives were formed with very high enantioselectivity. You [60] described the first enantioselective [4+1] annulation reaction between N‐(tert‐butoxycarbonyl)benzamides and alkenes via rhodium catalyzed C−H activation using chiral dimeric rhodium precatalysts (Scheme 19 D). The reaction proceeds under mild conditions and is fully atom economic, requiring only minimal amounts of additives, although the reaction was performed under argon atmosphere and trifluoroethanol as the solvent. The methodology was applied to a broad range of benzamide and styrene derivatives with the only major limitations arising from ortho‐substituted styrene derivatives.

Scheme 19.

Scheme 19

Asymmetric synthesis on isoindolinones via rhodium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Ruthenium catalyzed C−H functionalization

Ru‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation‐cyclization

Similarly to rhodium, a single ruthenium precatalyst, dichloro(p‐cymene)ruthenium(II) dimer, has mainly dominated the C−H functionalization reactions. One of the earliest examples was described by Hashimoto et al. [61] coupling benzanilide with butyl acrylate in 80 % yield in the presence of dichloro(p‐cymene)ruthenium(II) dimer and copper(II) acetate hydrate as oxidant, illustrated in Scheme 20.

Scheme 20.

Scheme 20

Coupling of benzanilide with butyl acrylate by means of ruthenium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

N‐Sulfonated benzamides have been successfully utilized as substrates in the ruthenium catalyzed C−H functionalization reactions for the synthesis of 3‐substituted isoindolinones. Ackermann [62] described an oxidative C−H coupling with subsequent aza‐Michael reaction between ortho‐substituted N‐tosyl‐benzamides and a variety of acrylates (Scheme 21 A). Miura et al. [63] utilized a similar approach to C−H functionalization applied to internal alkynes and N‐sulfonated aromatic amides, followed by base catalyzed intramolecular cyclization (Scheme 21 B). Later the methodology was extended to aldimines [64] as well (Scheme 21 C and D).

Scheme 21.

Scheme 21

N‐Sulfonated benzamides as substrates in isoindolinone synthesis by means of ruthenium catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Jeganmohan [65] described the use of allylic alcohols and N‐alkyl/aryl benzamides in oxidative C−H coupling/cyclization cascade. N‐Benzylated benzamides proved to be the best substrates under the conditions utilized, providing a broad range of 3‐subtituted isoindolinones (Scheme 22 A). Based on experimental investigations, it was proposed that the allylic alcohols would most likely dehydrogenatively convert into α,β‐unsaturated enones prior to the C−H functionalization and cyclization cascade. Few years later the methodology was expanded to coupling of N‐alkylated benzamides with phenyl vinyl sulfone or acrylate derivatives, producing 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones (Scheme 22 B and C). [66] Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the 3‐(phenylsulfonyl)methylene derivatized isoindolinones could be converted into aristolactams in a single step in good, isolated yields.

Scheme 22.

Scheme 22

Ruthenium catalyzed coupling of benzamides and olefins to 3‐substituted isoindolinones.

Similarly to their work with rhodium, [47] Liu [67] reported a ruthenium catalyzed formal [4+1] annulation of propargyl alcohol derivatives with N‐ethoxy benzamides by means of C−H functionalization reaction (Scheme 23). In comparison to the rhodium catalyzed method the overall isolated yields are very close to each other and the reaction with the ruthenium catalyst is operated at slightly lower temperature, not to mention the price difference between rhodium and ruthenium complexes. Similar to the work on rhodium, it was proposed that the reaction proceeds via π‐allylic ruthenacycle intermediate.

Scheme 23.

Scheme 23

Coupling of propargyl alcohol derivatives with N‐ethoxy benzamides.

Jeganmohan [68] demonstrated the utility of dichloro(p‐cymene)ruthenium(II) dimer as precatalyst for the cyclization of benzonitriles with phenyl vinyl sulfone or acrylate derivatives producing 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones with very high Z selectivity (Scheme 24 A and B). In these reactions, the benzonitrile is oxidized in situ to benzamide by the copper(II) acetate followed by the C−H functionalization and subsequent cyclization. Liu [69] described the use of imidates and electron deficient terminal olefins in the synthesis of various 3‐methyleneisoindolin‐1‐ones (Scheme 24 C). The N−H imidates functioned as a directing group for the oxidative alkenylation/annulation cascade, yielding exclusively the Z‐isomer of the 3‐methyleneisoindolin‐1‐one derivatives.

Scheme 24.

Scheme 24

Reagents with unsaturated carbon nitrogen bonds utilized in isoindolinone synthesis.

Ru‐catalyzed spiroannulation via C−H functionalization

The use of 3‐aryl‐N‐sulfonyl ketimines and aryl‐isocyanate in spiroannulation to form spiro‐isoindolinone‐benzosultams was established by Subba Reddy (Scheme 25). [70] The methodology produced a variety of spiro‐isoindolinone‐benzosultams in good yields without the excessive need of additives. Based on previous publications, the reaction was proposed to proceed via initial formation of benzamide derivative by C−H functionalization followed by the cyclization.

Scheme 25.

Scheme 25

Ru‐catalyzed spiroannulation via C−H functionalization.

Nickel catalyzed C−H functionalization

Ni‐catalyzed olefination‐cyclization

Both Zheng et al. [71] and Zhang [72] described a nickel catalyzed oxidative C−H alkynylation/annulation cascade with terminal alkynes under oxygen atmosphere yielding 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones in mostly Z‐selective manner (Scheme 26 A and B, respectively). The Z/E selectivity was mainly attributed to the steric hindrance formed by the substituent in both substrates. In both cases, the reaction mechanism is proposed to proceed in identical manner, by initial C−H alkynylation of the aromatic ring, followed by intramolecular annulation to form the isoindolinone.

Scheme 26.

Scheme 26

Nickel catalyzed alkenylation/annulation cascade terminal alkenes and benzamides with pendant directing groups.

Chen [73] used 8‐quinoline as a directing group for nickel(II)/silver(I)‐catalyzed C−H activation and intramolecular annulation cascade (Scheme 27). Geminal dibromoalkenes were utilized to from bromoalkynes in situ with the help of sodium carbonate followed by alkynylation via nickel catalyst. Subsequent cyclization was mediated by silver carbonate and tert‐butylammonium iodide forming a number of 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones in moderate to good yields.

Scheme 27.

Scheme 27

C−H activation and intramolecular annulation cascade between geminal dihalo olefins and N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides.

Ni‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

Nickel catalyzed oxidative insertion of isocyanides to N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides forming 3‐iminoisoindolinones was reported by Lei (Scheme 28). [74] Nickel(II) bis(acetylacetonate) was utilized as the catalyst and di‐tert‐butyl peroxide as the oxidant in trifluorotoluene at elevated temperature under nitrogen atmosphere, generating a broad variety of substituted 3‐iminoisoindolinones in poor to good yields. Only iodo‐derivatized benzamides were reported to afford poor yields.

Scheme 28.

Scheme 28

Nickel catalyzed oxidative synthesis of 3‐iminoisoindolinones.

Copper catalyzed C−H functionalization

Cu‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation‐cyclization

Wang et al. [75] described a copper(II) acetate catalyzed aromatic C−H bond coupling of a number of oxazoline protected benzamides and malonates with a subsequent intramolecular ring closure to form 3,3‐disubstituted isoindolinones under air (Scheme 29). The methodology was found to be very specific to malonates as the use of 3‐oxobutanoate afforded 1‐oxo‐1H‐isochromene derivative.

Scheme 29.

Scheme 29

Copper(II) acetate catalyzed aromatic C−H bond coupling to malonates.

Yu [76] established a copper(I) catalyzed radical benzylation and cyclization of tertiary enamides generating a variety 3,3‐disubstituted isoindolinone derivatives in moderate to good yields. In this manner, two new C−C bonds are generated in successive fashion (Scheme 30). While the detailed reaction mechanism is not yet fully clarified, it was postulated that the catalyst, copper(I) chloride, in combination with an oxidant, di‐tert‐butyl peroxide, generates a benzyl radical which will initiate the C−C bond forming cascade together with the utilized tertiary enamides.

Scheme 30.

Scheme 30

Copper(I) catalyzed radical benzylation and cyclization of tertiary enamides.

Cu‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

Takamatsu et al. [77] developed the first copper‐catalyzed formal [4+1] cycloaddition of N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides and isocyanides via C−H bond functionalization (Scheme 31). While the reaction is catalyzed by, generally, low‐cost copper(I) bromide dimethyl sulfide complex, a significant amount oxidant (MnO2 under oxygen atmosphere) and additive (Ph2S) are required for the reaction to proceed as well as reaction temperature of 170 °C.

Scheme 31.

Scheme 31

Copper‐catalyzed formal [4+1] cycloaddition of N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides and isocyanides to 3‐iminoisoindolinones.

Cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization

Co‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation‐cyclization

Both J. Zhang et al. [78] and L.‐B. Zhang et al. [79] reported very similar cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization based methods applied to isoindolinone synthesis. J. Zhang investigated a more general method for γ‐lactam synthesis and utilized it to isoindolinones (Scheme 32 A), whereas L.‐B. Zhang strictly focused on isoindolinones (Scheme 32 B). J. Zhang utilized cobalt(II) acetate as a catalyst for N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides and alkynes, whereas L.‐B. Zhang applied cobalt(II) oxalate for benzamides with N‐2‐aminopyridine 1‐oxide auxiliary. Based on experimental evidence, both authors presented a similar reaction mechanism where the terminal alkyne is activated with silver reagent followed by ortho‐aromatic‐C−H‐alkynylation and subsequent intramolecular annulation.

Scheme 32.

Scheme 32

Cobalt catalyzed C−H alkynylation/annulation cascade generating isoindolinones.

Ackermann [80] demonstrated the use cobalt(II) acetate in a C−H olefination/annulation cascade with N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides and acrylates as substrates (Scheme 33 A). Later, Jeganmohan [81] applied somewhat similar reaction conditions for N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamides and maleimides as substrates generating 3‐spirosubstituted isoindolinones (Scheme 33 B). Where Ackermann applied a mixture of PEG 400 and trifluoroethanol as the solvent and silver pivalate as the oxidant, Jeganmohan utilized 1,2‐dichloroethane as the solvent with silver carbonate as the oxidant and a small amount of pivalic acid as additive to improve the reaction yields. Both proposed very similar reaction mechanisms for the initial C−H alkenylation, followed by cyclization either as separate reaction (Ackermann) or as a part of the same catalytic cycle (Jeganmohan).

Scheme 33.

Scheme 33

Cobalt(II) acetate catalyzed C−H olefination/annulation cascade.

Zhao [82] described the use of CoII and CuII as catalysts for oxidative C−H/N−H functionalization of benzamides with ketones (Scheme 34). Here, the copper(II) catalyst is utilized in dehydrogenation of the ketone with the help of (2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐yl)oxyl (TEMPO) and Ag2CO3 to form an α,β‐unsaturated ketone, which the is utilized in the cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization followed by annulation. The methodology was applied to a broad range of N‐(quinolin‐8‐yl) benzamide derivatives and a variety of ethyl aryl ketones.

Scheme 34.

Scheme 34

Ketones in cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Co‐catalyzed cyclization using carbene reagents

Li [83] applied α‐diazoketones as substrates for cobalt catalyzed oxidative C−H functionalization cyclization cascade. Depending on the choice of cobalt catalyst and oxidants, the reaction could be directed to form either 3‐mono‐ or 3,3‐disubtituted isoindolinones in moderate to excellent yields (Scheme 35 A and B).

Scheme 35.

Scheme 35

α‐Diazoketones for cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization.

Co‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

A variety of cobalt catalyzed methodologies for synthesis of 3‐iminoisosindolinones have been published during the past ten years, with a common feature in the use of 8‐quinolinyl (Q) directing group. Gu et al. [84] described the use of oxidative C−H functionalization/annulation cascade with cobalt(II) acetate as the catalyst and tert‐butyl peroxybenzoate as the oxidant (Scheme 36 A), followed by Hao [85] and Sundararaju [86] using cobalt(II) acetyl acetonate and silver salt as the oxidant (Scheme 36 B and C, respectively). Later, Sundararaju [87] reported a general site‐selective cobalt‐catalyzed insertion of isocyanides to form aryl amides through C−H bond activation and alcohol assisted intramolecular trans‐amidation with a significantly broad substrate scope (Scheme 36 D). Chen et al. [88] presented a mild cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization/annulations cascade using electrochemical oxidation in an undivided cell equipped with a reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) anode and nickel cathode (Scheme 36 E). In their work, electricity was utilized as the oxidant removing the need for stoichiometric oxidants but still stoichiometric amounts of pivalate salts were required as additives. In generalization for all above‐mentioned reactions, benzamides bearing steric bulk near the C−H functionalization site or benzamides with nitro‐substituents are more likely to result in poor yields.

Scheme 36.

Scheme 36

Cobalt catalyzed synthesis of 3‐imino isosindolinones from benzamides and isocyanides.

Similarly to 8‐quinolinyl, 2‐(1‐methylhydrazinyl)pyridine has been utilized as a directing group in cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization/annulation cascade of benzamides with isocyanides. Zhai [89] described an additive free cobalt‐catalyzed formal [4+1] cycloaddition protocol to 3‐iminoindolinones in anisole at elevated temperature utilizing oxygen as the oxidant (Scheme 37 A). This method proved to be quite robust, efficiently yielding a variety of 3‐iminoisoindolinones mostly in very good, isolated yields. Ackermann [90] also applied the 2‐(1‐methylhydrazinyl)pyridine derivatized benzamides for electrocatalytic oxidative C−H activation/annulation cascade without the need to for external stoichiometric oxidant but still a significantly elevated temperature is required (Scheme 37 B).

Scheme 37.

Scheme 37

Cobalt catalyzed C−H functionalization/annulation cascade of benzamides with isocyanides.

Cross‐Coupling: Annulation/Cyclization

Transition metal catalyzed coupling reactions are among the most efficient methods available for forming carbon−carbon bonds. [91] To date, a variety of effective coupling processes, such as intramolecular Heck or Sonogashira reactions, have allowed the preparation of isoinolinone scaffolds and this field is dominated by palladium‐ and copper‐catalyzed reactions. In this section we discuss the developments in this area, focusing on reactions involving C−C bond formation in cyclization/annulation processes. The following section is categorized by the metal used and subcategorized by the type of isoindolinone derivative obtained as product.

Palladium‐catalyzed coupling reactions

Pd‐catalyzed olefination/alkylation/arylation‐cyclization

In 2011, a microwave assisted Pd/BINAP catalyzed copper‐free Sonogashira coupling 5‐exodig cycloisomerization domino reaction to construct 3‐(phenylmethylene) isoindolinones starting from 2‐halobenzamides and alkynes was reported by Hellal and Cuny. This reaction is compatible with both electron donating and electron withdrawing substituents (Scheme 38). [92]

Scheme 38.

Scheme 38

Microwave assisted Pd/BINAP catalyzed reaction by Hellal and Cuny.

A highly stereoselective Pd catalyzed strategy to access (Z)‐3‐benzylidene‐isoindolinones via denitrogenative tandem alkynylation/cyclization reaction of 1,2,3‐benzotriazinones with aromatic terminal alkynes was described by Mannathan (Scheme 39). [93] This reaction proceeds in the presence of copper cyanide (CuCN) which showed to be essential for the cyclomerization process together with Pd‐catalyst.

Scheme 39.

Scheme 39

Tandem alkynylation/cyclization reaction to access functionalized (Z)‐3‐benzylidene‐isoindolinones.

In 2018, Mendoza‐Perez and Vazquez described a microwave assisted domino reaction starting from N‐protected iodoaminoacrylates and boronic acids via 5‐exo–trig process, followed by Suzuki coupling, to yield isoindolinones bearing quaternary carbon centers (Scheme 40). [94]

Scheme 40.

Scheme 40

Microwave assisted synthesis of C3‐tetrasubstituted isoindolinones.

Gevorgyan described the synthesis of 3‐substituted isoindolinones involving a visible light induced palladium catalyzed intramolecular C−H arylation of benzamides via fragmentation of C(sp2)−O bonds of aryl triflates. [95] The reaction was reported to proceeds via formation of hybrid aryl Pd‐radical intermediates. By using benzamides bearing alkyl, methoxy, halo‐, trifluoromethyl and naphthyl groups, this reaction provides the corresponding isoindolinones in moderate to good yields. Cyclization of cyclohexyl‐ and isobutyl‐derivatized amides was also successful leading to the formation of the products in moderate to good yields (Scheme 41).

Scheme 41.

Scheme 41

Visible‐light‐induced Pd‐catalyzed C−H arylation of benzamides by Gevorgyan.

In 2011, a Q‐Phos ligated palladium catalyzed domino carbohalogenation reaction forming indoline‐fused isoindolinones containing multiple stereogenic centers was reported by Lautens and co‐workers. [96] Under the reported reaction conditions, the polyunsaturated aryl iodide provides the domino cyclization product in high yield and diastereoselectivity with no formation of monocyclization product. In addition, aryl bromides can be used to form the polycyclic alkyl iodide derivative via halogen exchange domino reaction (Scheme 42).

Scheme 42.

Scheme 42

Pd‐catalyzed domino cyclization by Lautens.

Singh and co‐workers [97] reported a Pd‐catalyzed decarboxylative free radical approach from various substituted 2‐phenyl‐4H‐benzo[d][1,3]oxazin‐4‐ones and α‐oxo carboxylic acids in the presence of (NH4)S2O8 as the oxidant and AgNO3 as co‐oxidant (Scheme 43). A series of controlled experiments ascertained the formation of an acylated intermediate, which is converted into the targeted product. The reaction was also tested in the presence of the free radical scavenger (2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐yl)oxidanyl (TEMPO) suggesting that the first acylation step follows a radical pathway.

Scheme 43.

Scheme 43

Functionalization of 2‐phenyl‐4H‐benzo[d][1,3]oxazin‐4‐ones with α‐oxo carboxylic acids.

Pd‐catalyzed cyclization via dearomatization/Heck reaction

Vachhani and Van der Eycken reported a strategy to synthesize a broad scope of spiroindolinone‐isoindolinones by Buchwald–Hartwing addition elimination strategy starting from dihalo N‐substituted N‐benzamides (Scheme 44). [98] A range of electron‐withdrawing and electron‐donating substituents on the substrates were compatible with these reaction conditions.

Scheme 44.

Scheme 44

Pd catalyzed cascade cyclization by Van der Eycken.

In 2015, Pal and co‐workers reported a double Heck reaction to yield indolone‐fused isoindolinone rings starting from dihalo N‐allyl substituted N‐arylbenzamide derivatives. [99] This methodology is based on the reactivity differences of the aromatic halides of the starting amides towards the Pd‐catalyst (Scheme 45 A). The authors proposed that substrates with more reactive halides on the aniline ring (X in Scheme 45 A) than on the aroyl moiety (Y in Scheme 45) is essential for this reaction. One year later, Kim reported a sequential Heck reaction of benzamidoacrylates with Pd(OAc)2 and NaHCO3 to render an indolizine‐fused isoindolinone ring as part of the strategy for the total synthesis of decumbenine B (Scheme 45 B). [100]

Scheme 45.

Scheme 45

Synthesis of fused isoindolinone rings via Heck reaction.

Polycyclic isoindolinones can be efficiently synthesized by palladium catalyzed dearomative transformations. Dearomative Heck reactions of indoles have been reported as an efficient method for the construction of indoline‐fused isoindolinone skeleton containing quaternary stereocenters. In 2012, Yao and Wu set a precedence [101] for indole dearomatization methods involving a carbopalladation mechanism, via catalytic intramolecular Heck‐type dearomatization reaction starting from 2,3‐disubstituted indoles (Scheme 46 A). It was shown that steric hindrance at the C2 position of the alkyl substituted indole resulted in lower reaction yields. Jia employed a Pd(OAc)2/(R)‐BINAP based catalyst system to achieve the first asymmetric indole dearomatization reaction to yield chiral polycyclic isoindolinones with excellent enantioselectivities via reductive Heck reaction using C2‐substituted indoles (Scheme 46 B). [102] Steric effect from aromatic groups at C2‐position in the indole resulted in significantly lower yields. One year later, Kitamura and Fukuyama reported an asymmetric dearomative Heck type cyclization of an N‐acyl indole using a palladium catalyst with Feringa's phosphoramide ligand to obtain polycyclic compound bearing the isoindolinone moiety at multigram scale as part of a synthetic strategy for the synthesis of hinckdentine A (Scheme 46 C). [103] Wang, Shang and co‐workers [104] described the first dearomative palladium catalyzed isocyanide insertion reaction for synthesis of indoline‐fused isoindolinones via dearomative aryl/cycloimidoylation of N‐(2‐bromobenzoyl)indoles. This methodology was reported to have a wide functional group tolerance (Scheme 47).

Scheme 46.

Scheme 46

Dearomative Heck type reaction synthesis of polycyclic isoindolinones and intermediate in synthesis of hinckdentine A.

Scheme 47.

Scheme 47

Dearomative aryl/cycloimidoylation of indoles.

In addition to indole dearomatization transformations, a palladium catalyzed domino Larock annulation/Heck dearomatization reaction to render tetracyclic indoline‐isoindolinones derivatives was investigated. [105] The reaction proceeds via Larock annulation of N‐bromobenzoyl o‐iodoanilines with alkynes and a subsequent intramolecular dearomative Heck reaction to form three chemical bonds in a single step (Scheme 48). A broad scope of substrates was employed to afford the products in moderate to good yields.

Scheme 48.

Scheme 48

Dearomative arylation of indoles by Jia.

Palladium catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular dearomatizations of pyrroles to yield pyrroline‐fused isoindolinones were described by both Jia [106] and You [107] in 2018 (Scheme 49). Jia reported the use of Pd(dba)2 and (S)‐SEGPHOS ligand and extended the methodology to the dearomatization of disubstituted indoles using aryl triflate derivatives to obtain the indoline‐isoindolinone products in moderate to high yields and good enantioselectivities. You utilized a Pd(OAc)2 as catalysts in collaboration of Feringa's phosphoramide ligand, obtaining similar yields and enantioselectivities as Jia.

Scheme 49.

Scheme 49

Pyrrole and indole asymmetric dearomatization by You and Jia.

Palladium catalyzed Heck/anion capture sequence reactions represent an important method for 1,2‐difunctionalization of alkenes, which starts with an alkene carbopalladation with subsequent coupling of alkyl‐Pd with nucleophiles. A series of effective examples using this type of domino reactions as a good strategy for the dearomatization of indoles to render bifunctionalized indoline‐fused isoindolinones bearing quaternary carbon centers have been reported. Such methodologies typically involve the use of a range of external nucleophiles including H‐phosphonates, [108] hydrides, [109] alkynes, [110] cyanides, [111] boroxines, [112] organoboron esters, [113] azoles [114] and N‐arylsulfonylhydrazones [115] as capturing agents to trap the benzyl‐Pd species derived from the carbopalladation step (Scheme 50).

Scheme 50.

Scheme 50

Pd‐catalyzed bisfunctionalization of índoles.

Pd‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion‐cyclization

Khan and Pardasani reported a one‐pot Pd‐catalyzed isocyanide insertion, imine hydration and 5‐exodig cycloisomerization sequence reaction by using an isocyanide as amide surrogate. In this reaction, an alkylbenzamide is generated in situ followed by cyclization to give the isoindolinone derivative (Scheme 51). [116] The nature of the substituent on the triple bond had a major impact on the reaction. Aromatic groups containing an electron‐withdrawing substituent increased the efficiency of the reaction to produce the isoindolinone by decreasing the electron density at the proximal end of the triple bond. Alkyl and alkenyl substituents failed to produce the cyclized product and, instead, furnished an amide intermediate as the only product. The authors proposed that, in this reaction, the electrophilicity of the alkyne is the driving force of the tandem process and the presence of the Pd catalyst is crucial only in the carboxamidation step.

Scheme 51.

Scheme 51

Pd‐catalyzed triple tandem reaction towards isoindolinones by Khan and Pardasani.

In 2013, Chauhan described a microwave assisted highly stereoselective ligand free reaction protocol using amides and isocyanides as coupling partners to render substituted isoindolinones with high stereoselectivity via isocyanide insertion (Scheme 52). In this reaction a large variety of amides are well tolerated, except for 2‐chloro or 2‐bromo‐substituted amide substrates resulting in lower yields. [117]

Scheme 52.

Scheme 52

Pd‐catalyzed coupling reaction by Chauhan.

Nickel‐catalyzed coupling reactions

Ni‐catalyzed cyclization via alkylation

In 2011 Shacklady‐McAtee [118] and co‐workers described an intramolecular cyclization of N‐benzoyl aminals mediated by Ni0 in the presence of a Lewis acid to render a variety of isoindolinones C3‐substituted in moderate to good yields (Scheme 53). The reaction proceeds in three steps from benzoyl chloride, primary amines and aldehydes via initial formation of iminium ion intermediate with the help of the Lewis acid followed by an α‐amidoalkyl nickel (II) intermediate. An electron‐rich Ni0 catalyst is required for the formation of this in intermediate, which is then followed by the cyclization to final product.

Scheme 53.

Scheme 53

Ni‐catalyzed intramolecular cyclization.

Ni‐catalyzed cyclization via dearomatization/Heck reaction

In 2017, a Ni‐catalyzed asymmetric Heck type dearomatization reaction starting from C2‐substituted indoles to afford fused isoindolinone‐indolines with high enantioselectivity was reported by Zhou (Scheme 54 A). [119] The authors proposed that this mechanism is distinct from the analogous palladium catalyzed methods.[ 101 , 102 ] In this process, a nickel−carbon bond is converted into a C−H bond to release the product via protonation. This investigation constitutes the first example of a nickel‐catalyzed asymmetric reductive Heck cyclization. Recently, Lautens [120] reported a dearomative carboiodination reaction to install reactive secondary benzylic iodides (Scheme 54 B). The authors proposed that this reaction proceeds by the means of a syn intramolecular carbonickelation across a 2‐substituted indole with subsequent diastereoretentive reductive elimination of the carbon‐iodine bond to afford fused isoindolinone‐indoline rings. A wide variety of functional groups were well tolerated affording the products in moderate to good yields with excellent diastereoselectivities.

Scheme 54.

Scheme 54

Nickel catalyzed dearomative synthesis of isoindolinones.

Copper‐catalyzed coupling reactions

Cu‐catalyzed cyclization via olefination/alkylation

The use of copper catalyzed coupling reactions for synthesis of isoindolinones from products obtained from Ugi‐4CR reaction was described by Chauhan. [121] The diamides obtained from the Ugi‐4CR reaction were cyclized to isoindolinones via Cu‐catalyzed deamidative C−C coupling. This two‐step sequence allows the synthesis of isoindolinone derivatives using a broad range of 2‐halobenzoic acids, isocyanides, amines and aldehydes (Scheme 55).

Scheme 55.

Scheme 55

Ugi‐4CR reaction followed by Cu‐catalyzed deamidative C−C coupling by Chahuan.

Sen [122] reported a one‐pot palladium‐free copper‐mediated domino Sonogashira‐5‐exodig‐cyclization of o‐iodo‐N‐phenylbenzamides with phenylacetylene followed by regioselective nucleophilic addition of indole using CuI as the catalyst and a salen‐type ligand to obtain a library of indolyl isoindolinones in high yield and in short reaction time in aqueous micellar medium (Scheme 56). Using o‐bromo‐N‐phenylbenzamides, a lower reaction yield was observed and using the corresponding aryl chlorides the reaction was found to be inefficient.

Scheme 56.

Scheme 56

Synthesis of isoindolinones in an aqueous micellar medium by Sen.

In 2020, Yao reported a one‐pot two‐step sequential carbon degradation/ring contraction reaction for the synthesis of 3‐hydroxyisoindolinones from iodo‐benzamides and various substituted benzyl cyanides as benzoyl synthons in the presence of CuCl and l‐proline as the ligand under nitrogen atmosphere (Scheme 57). [123] The authors described the initial formation of the corresponding substituted aminoisoquinolinone, which showed to be stable after 12 h. Without isolating the isoquinoline derivative, the reaction vessel was opened to air allowing the ring contraction to take place. A broad reaction scope of various 3‐hydroxyisoindolinones was presented in moderate to good yields. The reactions performed using 2‐bromobenzyl cyanide substrates did not require the use of l‐proline as a ligand.

Scheme 57.

Scheme 57

Synthesis of 3‐hydroxyisoindolinones by Yao.

In 2016, a domino amidation/arylation reaction of quaternary and tertiary aminoboronates with 2‐halobenzoyl chlorides in the presence of 2,2'‐bipyrydine/copper(II) catalyst was reported by Dumas and co‐workers (Scheme 58 A). [124] A variety of acid chlorides were examined by the authors, aryl chlorides at any position of the ring were well tolerated (X in Scheme 58 A), as well as fluoride and electron‐donating methoxide were found compatible with the reaction conditions. Also, aryl bromides underwent cyclization exclusively at the 2‐Br group without the formation of intermolecular coupling products. The reaction performed well starting from aminoboronates containing an adjacent aromatic ring and bearing halogen and electron‐donating groups. This reaction is the first reported example of arylation of fully substituted aminoboronates or Cu‐catalyzed couplings of quaternary boronates. The authors proposed that the reaction proceed via configurationally unstable CuI‐intermediate as a racemic isoindolinone was observed when enantioenriched aminoboronates were utilized as starting materials. Based on the amidation/arylation sequence reported by Dumas, a stereospecific intramolecular Suzuki–Miyaura type cross‐coupling reaction of easily accessible enantioenriched α‐[(o‐bromobenzoyl)amino]benzylboronates using bipyridine‐copper catalyst was described by Yamamoto and Suginome (Scheme 58 B). [125] This reaction proceeds with stereochemical inversion relying on the stereoretentive transmetalation step, which is favored by using a Brønsted acid additive. The highest enantiospecificities were achieved using substrates with electron‐donating substituents in the para‐position of the pendant benzyl moiety (R1 at Scheme 58 B). Notably, sterically hindered groups at the stereogenic carbon afforded high enantiospecificities. In case of fully substituted stereogenic boron‐bound carbon atom centers (R3 = Me at Scheme 58 B), less sterically demanding bipyridine ligands resulted in higher enantioselectivities.

Scheme 58.

Scheme 58

Copper catalyzed cross‐coupling alkylborons for synthesis of isoindolinones.

While the majority of the reported procedures for the preparation of 3‐methyleneisoindolinones describe the use of 2‐halobenzamides, a Cu‐catalyzed one‐pot synthesis of targeted compounds via decarboxylative coupling of arylakynylcarboxylic acid with iodo‐ or bromobenzoic acid was reported by Lee in 2014. [126] This ligand free structurally divergent reaction methodology affords isoindolinone or isoquinolinone derivatives selectively from the same substrates by switching from one‐pot reaction to sequential addition ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) (Scheme 59 A). A broad range of arylalkynylcarboxylic acid were well tolerated, however, in the presence of aliphatic analogues no isoindolinone derivatives were observed. The methodology was further extended to the chloro‐benzoic acid substrates by the same authors (Scheme 59 B). [127]

Scheme 59.

Scheme 59

Synthesis of isoindolinone derivatives via decarboxylative coupling using iodo‐ or bromobenzoic acids by Lee.

A series of Cu‐catalyzed domino synthetic protocols for the synthesis of 3‐methyleneisoindolinones starting from 2‐halobenzamides and alkynes have been reported (Scheme 60).[ 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 ] In 2013, Zhang and co‐workers reported a stereoselective microwave assisted synthesis of (Z)‐3‐methyleneisoindolinone derivatives from N‐substituted‐2‐bromobenzamides and arylacetylenes using a Cu(OAc)2⋅H2O/DBU catalyst. [128] Later, a Cu‐catalyzed decarboxylative cross‐coupling of N‐substituted‐2‐halobenzamides with aryl alkynyl carboxylic acids, followed by 5‐exodig heteroannulation, was reported by the Patel. [129] The use of acid derivatives as alkyne surrogates has advantages, such as higher reactivity or lower susceptibility to homocoupling reaction. For 2‐bromo benzamides, a CuI/1,10‐phenantroline catalyst system is needed, however, when more reactive 2‐iodo benzamides were used as substrates the reaction proceeded smoothly in the absence of ligand without affecting the yield. In 2016, Yao [130] reported the reaction of alkynylanilines with 2‐iodo‐N‐methylbenzamides in the presence of a copper catalyst to form 3‐(2‐aminobenzylidene)‐2‐substituted isoindolinone derivatives via C‐terminal attack of the 2‐alkynylaniline to 2‐iodobenzamide. The isoindolinone products were converted to spiro fused isoindolinone‐indolines utilizing halonium ion mediated strategy using NBS/TCC in the presence of acetic anhydride. In the same year, the Prakash [131] described a triple domino desilylation, cross‐coupling and hydroamidation sequence under aqueous phase‐transfer conditions. Use of (silyl)alkynes as coupling partners afforded the products with exclusive Z‐configuration, with the exception of (silyl)alkynes containing strong electron‐withdrawing substituents. The scope of the (silyl)alkyne derivatives was found to be broad and allowed access to the target molecules with a varied range of functionalities in good yields. N‐Unprotected iodobenzamides were well tolerated, affording the substituted isoindolinones in high yield. In 2018, Phukan described a domino reaction of unprotected 2‐halobenzamide and terminal alkynes using a square pyramidal [Cu(DMAP)4I]I complex as a catalyst to yield the corresponding (Z)‐3‐methyleneisoindolinones with free NH group via cross‐coupling reaction followed by 5‐exodig cycloisomerization. [132] This methodology allows the use of a broad range of terminal alkynes. The authors also described the extension of this methodology to phenyl propiolic acid derivatives and silylated alkynes with N‐protected‐bromobenzamides to afford the products in good yield.

Scheme 60.

Scheme 60

Synthesis of methyleneisoindolinone derivatized from 2‐halobenzamides.

Palladium and copper catalyzed coupling reactions

Pd/Cu‐catalyzed cyclization via olefination

Based on the advantages of utilizing alkynylsilanes as coupling partners to afford 3‐methylene‐isoindolinones reported by Prakash in 2016, a multicomponent one‐pot reaction using TMSA, 2‐iodo‐N‐methylbenzamide and aryl halides (bromides or iodides) under Pd/Cu catalysis was investigated and reported by the same author. [131] This protocol affords the corresponding isoindolinones in high yields (Scheme 61) and emphasizes the importance of using alkylsilanes to facilitate consecutive cross‐coupling processes in one‐pot procedures from aryl electrophiles and TMSA as acetylene surrogate.

Scheme 61.

Scheme 61

Pd/Cu‐catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones.

Kumar [133] developed a one‐pot sequential strategy for the synthesis of azepino‐fused isoindolinones. A copper catalyzed Sonogashira coupling and intramolecular hydroamination was utilized to afford isoindolinones, followed by a Pd‐catalyzed intramolecular direct arylation reaction for the transformation of the isoindolinones formed to the targeted polyheterocycles (Scheme 62 A). This reaction starts from 2‐bromo‐N‐(2‐bromophenyl)benzamide and tolerates a broad range of phenylacetylene derivatives. Later, the synthesis of isoindolo[2,1‐b]isoquinolin‐7(5H)‐one from 2‐bromo‐N‐(2‐bromobenzyl)benzamides using a similar sequential strategy was described by the Kumar [134] with broad substrate scope and functional group compatibility (Scheme 62 B).

Scheme 62.

Scheme 62

Synthesis of azepino‐fused isoindolinones and isoindolo[2,1‐b]isoquinolin‐7(5H)‐one reported by Kumar.

Cobalt‐catalyzed coupling reactions

Co‐catalyzed alkylation

Co‐catalyzed hydroarylative cyclization of N‐(methylethenyl)‐N‐benzyl benzamides and PhSiH3 to afford C3‐tetrasubstituted N‐benzyl isoindolinones was reported by the Arai [135] (Scheme 63). This method enables facile control of regiochemistry and discrimination of two inequivalent aromatic rings, tolerating a variety of substrates.

Scheme 63.

Scheme 63

Co‐hydroarylative cyclization by Arai.

Carbonylation: Annulation/Cyclization

Transition metal‐catalyzed carbonylation reactions, are widely used in synthetic chemistry. The simplicity and low cost of carbon monoxide (CO) as C‐1 unit as well as its application in green chemistry and wide use in industry settings are among the most significant advantages of carbonylation reactions. A number of reviews [136] on the use of this type of transformations in heterocycle synthesis have appeared. Here, we intend to report a brief update on transition metal catalyzed carbonylation reactions applied into isoindolinone synthesis.

Palladium catalyzed carbonylation reactions

Pd‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−H functionalization

3‐Alkylidene isonindolinones were prepared by Garbiele and Mancuso by aminocarbonylation‐heterocyclization of 2‐ethynylbenzamides (Scheme 64). [137] A combination of palladium(II) iodide and potassium iodide was utilized as a catalyst to facilitate the oxidative monoaminocarbonylation of alkynes with nucleophilic secondary amines, followed by heterocyclization to 3‐alkylidene isoindolinone. The diastereoselectivity of the formed alkenes was mainly towards Z‐isomer but depending on the steric constraints formed by substrates a full diastereoselectivity towards E‐stereoisomer was also observed.

Scheme 64.

Scheme 64

Aminocarbonylation‐heterocyclization of 2‐ethynylbenzamides.

Jiang [138] reported a palladium‐catalyzed carbonylation of aromatic oximes via ortho‐C(sp2)−H bond functionalization (Scheme 65). While the reaction does take place under atmospheric carbon monoxide pressure, a significant amount of palladium catalyst is required. Nevertheless, in this manner a variety of N‐underivatized 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones can be generated in good yields.

Scheme 65.

Scheme 65

Carbonylative synthesis of 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones from ketimines and oximes.

Wang et al. [139] presented an oxalyl amide assisted palladium‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−H functionalization for synthesis of pyrrolidones which was applied to a small scope of isoindolinones (Scheme 66 A). The combination of silver salt as an oxidant and meta‐(trifuoromethyl)benzoic acid (m‐CF3PhCO2H) as an additive was found to be vital to achieve high yields. Later, Zhang et al. [140] applied a very similar carbonylation approach to unprotected benzyl amines utilizing copper(II) trifuoroacetate as the oxidant instead of silver (Scheme 66 B). As with many ortho‐C−H functionalization methods, substrates with ortho‐substituents resulted in significantly lower yields. Carbonylation of sterically hindered N‐alkyl or N‐aryl benzylamines using TEMPO as a stoichiometric oxidant was reported by Cheng et al. (Scheme 66 C). [141] The method provided good to high yields for N‐methyl/ethyl derivatized substrates and lower yields for N‐aryl derivatized. Finally, the methodology was successfully applied to the synthesis of spiropachysin‐20‐one.

Scheme 66.

Scheme 66

Palladium‐catalyzed carbonylation of benzyl amines via C−H functionalization.

Palladium catalyzed cyclocarbonylation (Scheme 67 A) and rhodium/palladium relay catalysis (Scheme 67 B) were applied to the synthesis of isoindolo[2,1‐b ]isoquinoline‐5,7‐diones by Guo et al. [142] In the case of the cyclocarbonylation, a wide range of substrates were tolerated with only drastic drop in the yield observed with ortho‐substituents (R3) in the pendant arene group. The arenes utilized in the cyclocarbonylation are commonly prepared via rhodium catalyzed annulation of suitable benzamide and aryl alkyne, and thus combined into one‐pot two‐step synthesis to achieve similar structures in facile manner. Instead of carbon monoxide, Wang [143] utilized carbon dioxide in the synthesis of isoindolo[2,1‐b]isoquinoline‐5,7‐diones via cyclocarbonylation in moderate to good yields (Scheme 67 C). Similarly as with method described by Guo the ortho‐substituent (R3) in the pendant arene group did not allow the carbonylation to take place. It was proposed that the activation of carbon dioxide proceeds via formation of hemicarbonate ion with lithium tert‐butoxide followed by ligand exchange with palladium(II) acetate forming the starting active catalytic complex.

Scheme 67.

Scheme 67

Synthesis fused polycyclic isoindolinone derivatives via palladium catalyzed carbonylation.

Pd‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−X functionalization

A multi‐component palladium catalyzed carbonylation reaction was presented by Kollár [144] and Han et al. [145] Kollar used 2‐iodobenzyl bromide in the presence of primary amines under carbon monoxide atmosphere to successfully synthesize a small scope of N‐derivatized isoindolinones (Scheme 68 A). Han et al. described an in situ condensation of 2‐bromobenzaldehydes and phenylhydrazines followed by palladium catalyzed carbonylation to generated 2‐amino isoindolinones (Scheme 68 B). Here, both 2‐bromo and 2‐iodobenzladehydes resulted in good to excellent yields but 2‐triflate bearing analogs yielded in significantly inferior outcome. Also, strongly electron withdrawing substituents on the benzene ring of the hydrazine reactants resulted in lower yields.

Scheme 68.

Scheme 68

Carbonalytive multi‐component reactions for synthesis of isoindolinones.

Cyclocarbonylative coupling of ortho‐chloro arylketimines with carbon monoxide was described by Hua [146] using phosphine ligated palladium catalyst at elevated temperatures (Scheme 69). In this manner, a number of 3‐methylidene isoindolinones were produced in good yields but switching to synthesis of 3‐ethylidene analog has proved challenging for the methodology.

Scheme 69.

Scheme 69

Carbonylative synthesis of 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones from ketimines and oximes.

Tandem stereocontrolled one‐pot synthesis of (Z)‐3‐methyleneisoindolinones via tandem sequential Blaise reaction/aminocarbonylation was described by Lee. [147] In situ generated Reformatsky reagent was reacted with 2‐bromobenzonitriles followed by palladium catalyzed carbonylation with carbon monoxide at atmospheric pressure (Scheme 70). In general, electron donating substituents (R1) in 2‐bromobenzonitriles provided very good yields of isoindolinone derivatives, whereas electron withdrawing halides resulted into lower isolated yields. In addition, a route to derivatized aristolactams from these (Z)‐3‐methyleneisoindolinone derivatives was described.

Scheme 70.

Scheme 70

Synthesis of (Z)‐3‐methyleneisoindolinones via tandem sequential Blaise reaction carbonylation.

A multi‐component cascade reaction utilizing either carbonylation or double‐carbonylation process of 2‐bromoanilines with 2‐formylbenzoic acid or 2‐halobenzaldehydes generating functionalized isoindolinones was reported by Wu (Scheme 71). [148] In the case of 2‐formylbenzoic acids, the use of 3‐amino‐2‐chloropyridine instead of 2‐bromoanilines resulted in significant drop in the yield but otherwise halide, methyl and acetyl substituents were well tolerated. In the case of 2‐halobenzaldehydes, 2‐iodobenzaldehyde substrates resulted in the highest yields, but still lower than what was obtained with 2‐formylbenzoic acids.

Scheme 71.

Scheme 71

Synthesis of functionalized isoindolinones from 2‐bromoanilines with 2‐formylbenzoic acid or 2‐halobenzaldehydes.

A variety of methods for intramolecular carbonylation of 2‐aryl indoles to isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐ones have been reported. Cho [149] described a combination of palladium(II) chloride with triphenyl phosphine as catalyst under 10 atm of CO and trimethylamine as base (Scheme 72 A), whereas Guo et al. [150] utilized palladium(II) acetate with n‐butyl‐di(1‐adamantyl)phosphine (BuPAd2) and 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) as the base at atmospheric carbon dioxide pressure (Scheme 72 B). Zhou [151] expanded a similar methodology to 2‐(1H‐indol‐2‐yl)phenyl tosylates with palladium(II) trifuoroacetate as the catalyst, 1,3‐bis(diphenylphospine)propane (DPPP) as ligand and inorganic tripotassium phosphate as the base instead of commonly utilized organic bases (Scheme 72 C).

Scheme 72.

Scheme 72

Synthesis of isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐one derivatives via palladium catalyzed intramolecular carbonylation.

Huang [152] described two methods for the preparation of 6H‐isoindolo[2,1‐α]indol‐6‐ones either by means of intramolecular carbonylation of 2‐(2‐iodophenyl)‐1H‐indoles or by intermolecular carbonylation of indoles with iodobenzenes followed by intramolecular dehydrogenative‐coupling (Scheme 73). For the intramolecular carbonylation, 4‐subtituted (R1) indoles resulted in lower yields with 2‐(2‐iodophenyl)‐4,5‐dichloro‐1H‐indole producing only trace amounts of the functionalized isoindolinone. While sequential two‐step intermolecular carbonylation of indoles with iodobenzenes/intramolecular dehydrogenative‐coupling was not utilized in one‐pot fashion, it was proven to be compatible with aldehyde and ester derivatized indoles.

Scheme 73.

Scheme 73

Synthesis of 6H‐isoindolo[2,1‐α]indol‐6‐ones by means of intramolecular carbonylation or by intermolecular carbonylation/intramolecular dehydrogenative‐coupling.

Cho extended their previous work of 2‐aryl indoles [149] carbonylation (Scheme 64 A) to intramolecular carbonylation of 2‐(2‐bromovinyl)‐4,7‐dimethoxybenzimidazoles and 2‐(2‐bromoaryl)‐4,7‐dimethoxybenzimidazoles (Scheme 74). [153] While the work was mainly focused on 2‐(2‐bromovinyl)‐4,7‐dimethoxybenzimidazole carbonylation, a few examples leading into polycyclic isoindolinone bearing compounds were described.

Scheme 74.

Scheme 74

Palladium catalyzed intramolecular carbonylation 2‐(2‐bromoaryl)‐4,7‐dimethoxybenzimidazoles.

Asymmetric synthesis of fluorinated isoindolinones by palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular aminocarbonylation of the chiral‐α‐fluoroalkyl‐2‐iodobenzylamines was described by Bario et al. (Scheme 75 A). [154] In general, the best yields were achieved with tert‐butoxycarbonyl or benzyloxycarbonyl derivatized amines and “free” secondary amines resulted in slightly lower yields. Especially fluoride and trifluoromethyl substituents (R1) resulted in significant erosion of the optical purity, probably due to a base‐mediated anti β‐hydride elimination process as suggested by the authors. The degradation of the optical purity was correlated with pK a of the base and it was demonstrated that the racemization process could be minimized with weaker bases. Instead of 2‐halobenzylamines, Zhou [155] utilized 2‐(aminomethyl)aryl tosylates as substrates for intramolecular aminocarbonylation. Palladium(II) acetate and DPPP were used as catalyst/ligand combination in the presence of potassium carbonate as a base at 10 atm of carbon monoxide and significantly elevated temperatures were required for the reaction to proceed (Scheme 75 B). In general, the halogenated and ester bearing substrates resulted in moderate yields, whereas other tested substrates resulted in good to high yields.

Scheme 75.

Scheme 75

Palladium‐catalyzed aminocarbonylation of 2‐iodobenzylamines and 2‐(aminomethyl)aryl tosylates.

Palladium‐catalyzed one‐pot multicomponent cascade reaction of 2‐aminobenzamides with 2‐bromobenzaldehydes and carbon monoxide generating 6,6a‐dihydroisoindolo[2,1‐a]quinazoline‐5,11‐diones was described by Guo et al. (Scheme 76). [156] The reaction proceeds via initial cyclocondensation of the benzamide and benzaldehyde derivatives, followed by cyclocarbonylation. In general, the reaction can be applied to a number of readily available substrates in high yields with only quinoline analog of benzamide having significant detrimental effect to the yield.

Scheme 76.

Scheme 76

Synthesis fused polycyclic isoindolinone derivatives via palladium catalyzed carbonylation.

Based on their previous research,[ 142 , 156 ] Guo et al. [157] applied slightly modified conditions to the synthesis of indolo[1,2‐c]isoindolo[2,1‐a]quinazolin‐5(16aH)‐one derivatives in moderate to high yields via palladium catalyzed cyclocarbonylation of 6‐(2‐bromoaryl)‐5,6‐dihydroindolo[1,2‐c]quinazoline derivatives (Scheme 77). The main limitation, was found to be fluoro and nitro substituents (R2) in the pendant aryl moiety. The above‐mentioned products were also obtained directly by means of a one‐pot two‐step tandem reaction in modest yields. 2‐(1H‐Indol‐2‐yl)anilines and 2‐bromobenzaldehydes were subjected to initial cyclocondensation generating the 6‐(2‐bromoaryl)‐5,6‐dihydroindolo[1,2‐c]quinazoline precursors followed by the cyclocarbonylation.

Scheme 77.

Scheme 77

Synthesis of indolo[1,2‐c]isoindolo[2,1‐a]quinazolin‐5(16aH)‐one derivatives by means of palladium catalyzed cyclocarbonylation.

As an example, TAK‐071 is an M1 positive allosteric modulator pharmacophore developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, bearing an isoindolin‐1‐one ring system. In the scale‐up of the synthesis, a late stage carbocyclization was utilized. The benzyl amine derivative was carbonylated under 5 atm of carbon dioxide utilizing 1,1’‐ferrocenediyl‐bis(diphenylphosphine) (DPPF) ligated palladium(II) chloride as a catalyst in the presence of an organic base (Scheme 78). [158]

Scheme 78.

Scheme 78

Late‐stage carbocyclization to isoindolinone ring system in scale‐up synthesis of TAK‐071.

Pd‐catalyzed dearomative carbonylation

Wu [159] described the first example of palladium‐catalyzed dearomative carbonylation of N‐(2‐bromobenzoyl)indoles leading to a variety of polycyclic spiro compounds containing the isoindolinone skeleton. Here, palladium(II) acetate and DPPP as the catalyst/ligand combination with sodium tungstate as a base yielded the best results. The optimized conditions were successfully applied to a variety of anilines and alcohols as nucleophiles (Scheme 79).

Scheme 79.

Scheme 79

Synthesis of isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐one derivatives via palladium catalyzed intramolecular carbonylation.

Pd‐catalyzed carbonylation with CO‐surrogates

Carbon monoxide is one of the cheapest C1 sources available, but due to its hazardous properties, such as high toxicity and flammability, a constant use of CO detector is required for safety. This can limit its use especially in smaller and academic research laboratories. Wu [160] reported a palladium catalyzed C−H carbonylation protocol of ketimines utilizing nontoxic solid molybdenum(0) hexacarbonyl (Mo(CO)6) as an CO‐surrogate (Scheme 80 A). In this manner, 3‐methyleneisoindolin‐1‐ones were prepared in moderate to good yields. The best results were obtained by the use of benzohydrazine directing group but O‐methylhydroxylamine and acetohydrazide were also found to be viable directing groups albeit at best in moderate yields. Das [161] described a polystyrene‐supported palladium (Pd@PS) nanoparticle catalyzed multicomponent synthesis of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methyl isoindolinones from 2’‐iodoacetophenones and primary benzyl amines utilizing oxalic acid as CO‐surrogate (Scheme 80 B). The use of halogenated and trifuoromethoxy derivatized benzyl amines resulted in moderate yields.

Scheme 80.

Scheme 80

Molybdenum(0) hexacarbonyl and oxalic acid as CO‐surrogates for palladium catalyzed carbonylation.

Benzene‐1,3,5‐triyl triformate (TFBen) was applied as a CO‐surrogate by both Fu et al. [162] and Wu [163] to palladium catalyzed carbonylation of benzyl amines via oxidative C−H functionalization. Fu et al. applied the methodology to broad range of benzyl amines yielding the respective 3 and N‐substituted isoindolinones in moderate to good yields (Scheme 81 A). From the tested substrates, only cyano and bromo substituents resulted in lower yields and 3,4‐disubtituted benzyl amines lead into mixtures of isomeric structures. Wu described a route to N‐derivatized isoindolinones with a pendant 2‐methyl thiophene as a part of site‐selective carbonylative methodology (Scheme 81 B).

Scheme 81.

Scheme 81

TFBen as CO‐surrogate in palladium catalyzed carbonylation.

Wang [164] reported a palladium‐catalyzed ortho‐amidation of ketoximes with oxamic acids as the carbonyl and nitrogen source. When the methodology is applied to N‐monosubstituted oxamic acids, the ortho‐amidation is followed by intramolecular cyclization generating 3‐alkylidene isoindolinones (Scheme 82 A). Čarný et al. [165] described a multicomponent tandem palladium catalyzed carbonylation and C−C cross‐coupling via C−H activation between indoles, 1,2‐dibromobenzenes and carbon monoxide via CO‐surrogate (Scheme 82 B). Carbon monoxide utilized in the reaction was generated in a separate vial from glyoxylic acid and concentrated sulfuric acid. The reaction is described to proceed via in situ formed N‐(2’‐bromoaroyl)‐indole to 6H‐isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐ones in moderate to good yields. No reaction was observed in the cases of 3‐acetylindole and 5‐nitroindole. Unsymmetric 1,2‐dibromobenze derivatives led into mixtures of isometric structures which could be avoided by the use 2‐bromo‐phenyl trifluoromethane‐sulfonates.

Scheme 82.

Scheme 82

Synthesis of isoindolinones using N‐monosubstituted oxamic acids or CO generated from mixture of sulfuric and glyoxylic acid.

Pd‐catalyzed asymmetric carbonylation

Enantioselective preparation of chiral isoindolines via palladium‐catalyzed carbamoylation by means of C−H functionalization was reported by Tang (Scheme 83 A). [166] A chiral monophosphorus ligand (R)‐AntPhos was utilized as the ligand under 9 atm of carbon monoxide yielding a variety of chiral isoindolines in high enantiomeric excess and moderate to high yields. Long alkyl chains and bulky substituents in the amine as well as trifuoromethyl substituents in the aryl groups resulted in lower yields. An enantioselective oxidative carbonylation process of activated benzylic amines was described by Wu (Scheme 83 B). [167] A bimetallic Pd/Cu‐based catalyst system in the presence of mono‐N‐protected amino acid ligands catalyzed a C−H carbonylation of prochiral arylsulfonamides via desymmetrization process. The reaction provides a facile stereoselective construction of isoindoline‐1‐ones in good yields and enantioselectivities under atmospheric pressure of CO/O2 in the ratio of 1:5.

Scheme 83.

Scheme 83

Asymmetric synthesis of isoindolinones via carbonylation based strategies.

Rhodium catalyzed carbonylation reactions

Rh‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−H functionalization

H. Huang [168] described a rhodium catalyzed oxidative carbonylation of ketimines under 30 atm of carbon monoxide at significantly elevated temperatures, yielding 3‐alkylideneisoindolinones in moderate yields (Scheme 84).

Scheme 84.

Scheme 84

A rhodium catalyzed oxidative carbonylation of ketimines.

Q. Huang et al. [169] presented a rhodium‐catalyzed synthesis of 6H‐isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐one derivatives via oxidative N−H/C−H carbonylation of 2‐arylindoles under atmospheric CO‐pressure (Scheme 85). The optimized conditions were applied to a broad substrate scope generating the title compounds in moderate to very high yields. Substrates with cyano or nitro groups at the indole (R1) or iodo substituent at the pendant aryl (R2) group resulted in lowest yields.

Scheme 85.

Scheme 85

Rhodium‐catalyzed a synthesis of 6H‐isoindolo[2,1‐a]indol‐6‐ones via carbonylation.

Rh‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−X functionalization

Morimoto [170] reported a CO‐surrogate based RhI‐catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of 3‐substituted isoindolinones via aminocarbonylation reaction in moderate to good yield and very high ee (Scheme 86). First the rhodium catalyzed carbonylation of chiral N‐tosylated‐2‐halobenzylamines utilizing either pentafluorobenzaldehyde or formaldehyde as CO‐surrogate was optimized. In most cases the yield of the product was dependent on the CO‐surrogate utilized, with pentafluorobenzaldehyde achieving higher isolated yields in comparison to formaldehyde. Subsequently, an asymmetric one‐pot two‐step reaction with RhI‐catalyst was described, starting from coupling of prochiral aldimines and arylboronic acids followed by subsequent carbonylation reaction, yielding the title compounds close to similar yields and enantiomeric excesses when compared to those of the single step carbonylation.

Scheme 86.

Scheme 86

CO‐surrogate based RhI‐catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of 3‐substituted isoindolinones.

Rh‐catalyzed carbonylation with CO‐surrogates

Zhou et al. [171] reported [RhCp*(MeCN)2][SbF6]‐complex as a catalyst for ortho‐amidation of ketoximes via C−H functionalization with isocyanates generating 3‐alkylideneisoindolinones (Scheme 87). The reaction exhibited a high regioselectivity and functional‐group tolerance allowing for a broad substrate scope. While the reaction proceeds without the use of additives and does not produce any significant environmentally hazardous waste, it is operated in 1,2‐dichloroethane. Main challenges for the reaction proved to be ortho‐halogenated ketoximes and bulkier isocyanates.

Scheme 87.

Scheme 87

Rhodium catalyzed ortho‐amidation of ketoximes isocyanates.

Ruthenium catalyzed carbonylation reactions

Ru‐catalyzed carbonylation with CO‐surrogate

Han et al. [172] developed a ruthenium‐catalyzed intramolecular C−H carbonylation for synthesis of isoindolin‐1‐one derivatives from oxalyl amide‐protected benzylamines, using isocyanate as a CO‐surrogate (Scheme 88). Variously substituted benzylamines were well tolerated, affording the isoindolin‐1‐ones in moderate to very high yields. Based on the substrate scope, 3‐ and/or 4‐substituted and unsubstituted benzyl amines resulted in lowest yields.

Scheme 88.

Scheme 88

A ruthenium‐catalyzed intramolecular C−H carbonylation.

Nickel catalyzed carbonylation reactions

Ni‐catalyzed carbonylation via C−X functionalization

A multicomponent nickel catalyzed carbonylative synthesis of isoindolinones from aryl iodides, aldimines and carbon monoxide in the presence of a chloride salt was reported by Tjutrins et al. (Scheme 89). [173] The reaction was postulated to proceed via the initial formation of N‐acyl iminium chloride salts, followed by a spontaneous nickel‐catalyzed cyclization yielding the isoindolinone derivatives in moderate to high yields. Cyano‐substituted aryl iodides as well as with bulky N‐substituents (R3) in the aldimines were found to result in lower yields.

Scheme 89.

Scheme 89

Nickel‐catalyzed carbonylative synthesis of isoindolinones.

Cobalt catalyzed carbonylation reactions

Co‐catalyzed carbonylation with CO‐surrogates

Zhong [174] and Grigorjeva [175] both applied diethyl azodicarboxylate (DEAD) and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD) as CO‐surrogates in the cobalt‐catalyzed oxidative C−H carbonylation of benzyl amines, using picolinamide as a traceless directing group (Scheme 90 A and B, respectively). In both cases, a variety of N‐underivatized isoindolinones were prepared in moderate to high yields, with marginal differences between electron withdrawing and donating substituents at the arene (R1). When chiral benzylic amines were used as substrates, the enantiopurity of the chiral center was maintained and Zhong demonstrated how the developed method could be applied to the synthesis of (+)‐garenoxacin.

Scheme 90.

Scheme 90

Cobalt‐catalyzed oxidative C−H carbonylation using CO‐surrogates.

Lactamization via Transition Metal Catalyzed Condensation or Addition Reactions

Zinc, scandium and indium catalyzed reactions

Zn, Sc and In‐catalyzed Mannich reaction‐lactamization

Multicomponent Lewis acid catalyzed Mannich/lactamization cascade for synthesis of various isoindolinones was described by both Singh [176] and Cai [177] (Scheme 91 A and B, respectively). Singh applied o‐formyl methylbenzoates, trimethylsilyl enol ethers and aniline derivatives in the presence of zinc(II) or scandium(III) triflate catalysts to generate a broad scope of isoindolinones in moderate to high yields. Here the main difficulties arose from ortho‐substituted anilines and anilines bearing multiple electron donating groups. Cai applied indium(III) triflate as a catalyst for 2‐formylbenzoic acids, primary amines and difluoroenoxysilanes to afford N‐substituted 3‐oxoisoindoline‐1‐difluoroalkyl derivatives in good yields with exception of ortho‐substituted anilines.

Scheme 91.

Scheme 91

Lewis acid catalyzed three‐component synthesis of isoindolinones via Mannich/lactamization cascade.

Zn, Sc and In‐catalyzed Strecker reaction‐lactamization

Singh [178] applied ZnII and InIII triflates (Scheme 92 A) and Cai [179] ScIII triflate (Scheme 92 B) to Strecker reaction/lactamization cascade, producing 3‐cyano derivatized isoindolinones in good to excellent yields. In the method reported by Singh, only very bulky ortho‐substituted anilines were reported to result in low isolated yields, whereas in the case of scandium(III) triflate catalyst only para‐nitro aniline and tert‐butyl amine were not tolerated.

Scheme 92.

Scheme 92

Metal triflate catalyzed Strecker reaction/lactamization cascades.

Zn and In‐catalyzed allylation‐lactamization

Lewis acid catalyzed one‐pot cascade was optimized for InIII and ZnII triflate catalysts utilizing tin based allylation reagent (Scheme 93). [180] In accordance with the Lewis acid catalyzed Mannich and Strecker reaction based methodologies (vida supra), the substituents at o‐formyl benzoates had minimal effect on the yield of the reaction while bulky O‐substituted anilines had a significantly detrimental effect on the yield.

Scheme 93.

Scheme 93

Catalytic homoallylation and allylation cascades for isoindolinone synthesis.

Ytterbium catalyzed reactions

Yb‐catalyzed addition‐lactamization

Jang [181] described an ytterbium(III) triflate catalyzed radical addition involving 2‐formylbenzoate‐derived hydrazone, isopropyl iodide, diphenylsilane and triethylborane (Scheme 94). In this manner, a variety of 3‐substituted isoindolinones we formed in moderate to high yields, with only amine‐substituted or 3‐substituted 2‐formylbenzoates leading into diminished yields. Also, switching from benzoyl hydrazones to l‐proline analog the respective chiral 3‐subtituted isoindolinones were produced with diastereomeric ratios up to 9:1.

Scheme 94.

Scheme 94

Ytterbium(III) triflate catalyzed radical addition forming 3‐substituted isoindolinones.

Cobalt catalyzed reactions

Co‐catalyzed Pinner–Dimroth reaction

Shi [182] described a cobalt(II) chloride catalyzed Pinner–Dimroth tandem reaction between 2‐cyanobenzaldehyde and 1,3‐dicarbonyl compounds yielding 3‐subtituted isoindolinones in moderate to high yields, albeit at high catalyst loading and limited substrate scope (Scheme 95).

Scheme 95.

Scheme 95

Cobalt(II) chloride catalyzed Pinner‐Dimroth tandem reaction.

Nickel Catalyzed Reactions

Ni‐catalyzed homoallylation reaction

Singh presented a homoallylation and allylation based cascades for isoindolinone synthesis via in situ generated imines from primary amines and o‐formyl benzoates. The homoallylation was achieved utilizing a Ni(acac)2 catalyst and stoichiometric amount of diethylzinc under inert atmosphere forming the 3‐substituted diastereomeric isoindolinones in moderate to good yields. In general, steric hindrance near the C3‐position led to the best diastereomeric ratios albeit at the expense of yield (Scheme 96). [183]

Scheme 96.

Scheme 96

Catalytic homoallylation and allylation cascades for isoindolinone synthesis.

Copper catalyzed reactions

Cu‐catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones using hypervalent iodine reagents

Li [184] reported a number of copper catalyzed methods for isoindolinone scaffolds from 2‐formylbenzonitriles and diaryliodonium salts (Scheme 86, see later). The reactions proceed via copper catalyzed electrophilic activation of the cyano group and undergo C−N/C−C tandem cyclizations to afford the isoindolinone scaffolds. By selecting suitable catalyst and hypervalent iodine reagent, a divergent cyclization was initially developed forming either 2,3‐diarylisoindolinone derivatives or polycyclic compounds containing two isoindolinone scaffolds in moderate to good yields (Scheme 97 A). [184a] The methodology for 2,3‐diaryl substituted isoindolinone synthesis was further extended to a multicomponent reaction allowing for more flexible synthesis of various isoindolinone derivatives (Scheme 97 B). [184b] Unsymmetrical diaryliodonium salts could be replaced by combination of symmetric diaryliodonium salts with a suitable arene. The multicomponent methodology was further expanded to encompass alkyl aryl ketones and α‐methylstyrene instead of arenes to generate isoindolinone derivatives and dihydroisoindolo[2,1‐a]quinolin‐11(5H)‐ones in moderate to excellent yields (Scheme 97 C). [184c] Finally, the three‐component cascade cyclization methodology was applied to cyclopropyl ketones constructing fused polycyclic isoindolinones. Here the final step involves a hetero‐[4+2]‐cycloaddition reaction between an N‐aryl nitrilium cation and dihydrofuran derivative formed from the cyclopropyl ketone (Scheme 97 D). [184d]

Scheme 97.

Scheme 97

Synthesis of isoindolinones using hypervalent iodide compounds.

Cu‐catalyzed in situ imine formation/alkynylation/lactamization cascade

Sun et al. [185] reported a copper catalyzed multicomponent reaction for the synthesis of 2,3‐disubstituted isoindolinones utilizing in situ imine formation/alkynylation/lactamization cascade with methyl 2‐formylbenzoates, anilines and alkynes as the reactants (Scheme 98 A). While a number of isoindolinones can be formed in this manner in low to good yields, the isolated yields are highly dependent on the alkynes utilized as substrates. In addition, similarly above‐mentioned metal triflate catalyzed methods the ortho‐substituted anilines resulted at best in trace amounts of product. In 2014, Singh [186] reported for the first time a highly enantioselective Cu‐catalyzed alkynylation/lactamization cascade of o‐formyl methyl benzoates with aromatic amines and terminal alkynes using a iPr‐pybox ligand (Scheme 98 B). In the presence of aromatic amines bearing an ortho substituent and less nucleophilic amines, such as CbzNH2, the reaction furnished the product in low yield. Alkynes bearing aromatic rings or aliphatic side chains were successfully used. Methyl 2‐formyl benzoates containing electron‐withdrawing groups at the para position with respect to the aldehyde functional group did not afford the desired isoindolinone products. In general, lower reaction yields were observed using methyl 2‐formyl benzoates bearing electron withdrawing substituents by decreasing the nucleophilicity of the aromatic secondary amines. The absolute configuration of the products was assigned as S and the authors showed that steric hindrance adjacent to the aldehyde resulted in significant drop in enantiomeric purity. Later, the same group used the alkynylation/lactamization protocol as a key step in the synthesis of medicinally important isoindolinones. [187] Maiti [188] applied a copper(II) based heterogeneous nanocatalyst for similar transformation in good yields but only a few examples towards the synthesis of isoindolinones were explored (Scheme 98 C).

Scheme 98.

Scheme 98

Copper catalyzed in situ imine formation/alkynylation/lactamization cascades.

Cycloaddition, Cyclotrimerization and Annulation Reactions

Gold catalyzed reactions

Au‐catalyzed cycloaromatization

A gold‐catalyzed cascade cycloaromatization to a broad range of enantioenriched isoindolinones from unconjugated (E)‐enediynes was described by Zamani et al. (Scheme 99). [189] It was shown that substituents at the enyne (R2) had most effect on the yield of the reaction but significant trends cannot be drawn based on the limited substrate scope. Based on experimental and computational evidence, the reaction was shown to proceed via a dual‐gold σ,π‐activation mode, involving a key gold‐vinylidene‐ and allenyl‐gold‐containing intermediate.

Scheme 99.

Scheme 99

Synthesis of isoindolinones via gold‐catalyzed cascade cycloaromatization.

Ruthenium and cobalt catalyzed reactions

Ru or Co‐catalyzed formal [2+2+2] cycloaddition

Sheppard [190] reported a ruthenium catalyzed formal [2+2+2] cycloaddition between amide tethered diynes and alkynes, generating a broad scope aryl substituted isoindolinones in highly regioselective manner (Scheme 100 A). While in most cases the isolated yields were from moderate to excellent, depending on the diyne/alkyne combination applied, a significant amount of homocoupling of the diynes was observed. This could however be mitigated by dropwise addition of the diyne to the reaction mixture. Méndez‐Gálvez et al. [191] also utilized a similar approach with cobalt catalyst to afford N‐unsubstituted isoindolinones, albeit only a few isoindolinone examples were reported (Scheme 100 B).

Scheme 100.

Scheme 100

Synthesis of isoindolinones via formal [2+2+2]‐cycloaddition.

Palladium and nickel catalyzed reactions

Pd‐catalyzed [4+2] cross‐benzannulation

Ma [192] reported an oxidative palladium and copper co‐catalyzed [4+2] cross‐benzannulation leading to diversely substituted isoindolinones from enediynes and alkynes (Scheme 101). For the reaction to take place, aromatic substituents at R1 were required, whereas aromatic substituents at R2 would improve outcome of the reactions. Both diaryl and dialkyl alkynes were well tolerated with few exceptions, but the regioselectivity with unsymmetrical alkynes was highly dependent on the substrate. Based on experimental observations the reaction was suggested to proceed by initial 5‐endo cyclization followed by a syn carbopalladation. Subsequent nucleophilic attack of H2O and CuII mediated one‐electron oxidation followed by oxidation with O2 would then provide the target compounds.

Scheme 101.

Scheme 101

Palladium and copper co‐catalyzed (4+2) cross‐benzannulation between enediynes and alkynes.

Ni‐catalyzed annulation

Kalyani [193] described a bis(cyclooctadiene)nickel(0) catalyzed arylation of ortho‐halo benzamides with sodium tert‐butoxide forming a variety of isoindolinones in moderate to high yields (Scheme 102). In general secondary and preferable tertiary carbon center was required adjacent to the amide as methyl substituted amides resulted in very low yields. It was shown that the reaction most likely proceed via radical intermediates which is align with observations on the increased efficiency of the arylation with more substituted alkyl C−H bonds adjacent to amide.

Scheme 102.

Scheme 102

Nickel catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones via annulation of benzamides.

Iridium catalyzed reactions

Ir‐catalyzed annulation

A similar to method presented Kalyani, [193] a light mediated quaternary annulation protocol was reported by Dai et al. [194] Here, strongly reducing iridium species based on tris[2‐phenylpyridinato‐C2,N]iridium(III) (fac‐Ir(ppy)3) was used as catalyst and potassium tert‐butoxide as the terminal reductant (Scheme 103). Even at 50 ppm catalyst loadings the quaternary annulation was able to compete with the uncatalyzed nucleophilic aromatic substitution, leading into full retention of the enantiomeric information. Reactions using ortho‐fluorinated, chlorinated or brominated benzamides provided good to excellent yields with the exception of substrates containing multiple halogens in the aryl ring.

Scheme 103.

Scheme 103

Visible‐light induced Iridium catalyzed synthesis of isoindolinones from benzamides.

Summary and Outlook

During the past ten years a significant amount of transition‐metal catalyzed methods applied to the synthesis of isoindolinones have been reported. By the methods presented above a vast number of isoindolinone derivatives can be accessed, without even taking into account the multitude of methods not employing transition metal catalysts. One of the most prominent fields of research relating to isoindolinone synthesis has been C−H functionalization reactions. While these methods often allow convenient routes from mostly commercially available compounds to isoindolinones, they are commonly prepared with super stoichiometric amounts of the oxidant or the additives. In both C−H functionalization and carbonylation based methodologies the use of temporary and sometimes‐permanent directing groups are a common feature. To date only a few examples of reactions with truly transient/traceless directing groups or methods with minimal need for additional reagents are presented.

In the future, increase in the amount of reports concerning enantioselective and multicomponent, directing group free methodologies can be expected. Interestingly, while the iron catalyzed methods have gained significant attention, to our knowledge, applications towards isoindolinone synthesis via C−C bond formation have not been described during the last decade. Similarly, the heterogeneous transition metal catalyzed methods for synthetic organic chemistry applications are limited when preparative approaches towards isoindolinones are considered.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Biographical Information

Dr. Savela received his MSc from the University of Turku, followed by PhD from Åbo Akademi University, Laboratory of Organic Chemistry. During his PhD studies, he focused on applied Lewis acid catalysis for synthetic organic chemistry. Currently he is working as a postdoctoral researcher at Åbo Akademi University, Laboratory Molecular Science and Technology.

graphic file with name CHEM-27-5344-g084.jpg

Biographical Information

Carolina Méndez‐Gálvez received her Ph.D. in 2013 from University of Santiago, in the group of Prof. Bruce Cassels. In 2011 she was a visiting Ph.D. student in Prof. Julio Seijas group at the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. From 2015 to 2017 she was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Bristol, UK, under the supervision of Prof. Robin Bedford. In 2018, she moved to Finland with a fellowship from Otto A. Malm foundation to join the group of Prof. Reko Leino at Åbo Akademi University. Her research interests include synthetic organic chemistry and homogeneous catalysis.

graphic file with name CHEM-27-5344-g023.jpg

Acknowledgements

Helpful comments and discussions with Professor Reko Leino are gratefully acknowledged.

R. Savela, C. Méndez-Gálvez, Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 5344.

References

  • 1. 
  • 1a. Breytenbach J. C., van Dyk S., van der Heever I., Allin S. M., Hodkinson C. C., Northfield C. J., Page M. I., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1629–1631; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1b. Neumann H., Strübink D., Lalk M., Klaus S., Hübner S., Spannenberg A., Lindequist U., Beller M., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1365–1375; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1c. Mikolasch A., Hessel S., Salazar M. G., Neumann H., Manda K., Gördes D., Schmidt E., Thurow K., Hammer E., Lindequist U., Beller M., Schauer F., Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56, 781–786; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1d. Csende F., Porkoláb A., Pharma Chem. 2018, 10, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lee I.-K., Kim S.-E., Yeom J.-H., Ki D. W., Lee M.-S., Song J.-G., Kim Y.-S., Seok S.-J., Yun B.-S., J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 95–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tejesvi M. V., Pirttilä A. M., Endophytes of Forest Trees: Biology and Applications. Forestry Sciences (Eds.: Pirttilä A. M., Frank A. C.), Springer, Berlin, 2011, 80, p. 302. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chen Z.-L., Zhu D.-Y., The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology (Ed.: Brossi A.), Academic Press, New York, 1987, 31, pp. 29–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Buttinoni A., Ferrari M., Colombo M., Ceserani R., J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1983, 35, 603–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. 
  • 6a. Linden M., Hadler D., Hofmann S., Hum. Psychopharmacol. 1997, 12, 445–452; [Google Scholar]
  • 6b. Zhuang Z.-P., Kung M.-P., Mu M., Kung H. F., J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 157–166; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6c. Norman M. H., Minick D. J., Rigdon G. C., J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 149–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ferland J.-M., Demerson C. A., Humber L. G., Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laboratori Baldacci S.p.A., Japanese Patent 5,946,268, 1984;; Chem. Abstr. 1984, 101, 54922. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Achinami, Ashizawa N., Kobayasui F., Japanese Patent 03,133,955, 1991;; Chem. Abstr. 1991, 115, 255977j. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Takahashi I., Kawakami T., Hirano E., Yokota H., Kitajima H., Synlett 1996, 353–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. 
  • 11a. Govindachari T. R., Ravindranath K. R., Viswanathan N., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 1, 1215–1217; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11b. Mertens A., Zilch J. H., Konig B., Schafer W., Poll T., Kampe W., Seidel S., Leser U., Leinert H., J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2526–2535; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11c. Pendrak I., Barney S., Wittrock R., Lambert D. M., Kingsbury W. D., J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2623–2625; [Google Scholar]
  • 11d. De Clercq E., J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2491–2517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. 
  • 12a. Taylor E. C., Zhou P., Jenning L. D., Mao Z., Hu B., Jun J.-G., Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 521–524; [Google Scholar]
  • 12b. Armoiry X., Aulagner G., Facon T., J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2008, 33, 219–226; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12c. Kim K. H., Noh H. J., Choi S. U., Lee K. R., J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 575–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. 
  • 13a. Trivedi S., Dekermendjian K., Julien R., Huang J., Lund P.-E., Krupp J., Kronqvist R., Larsson O., Bostwick R., Drug Deliv. Technol. 2008, 6, 167–179; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13b. Macsari I., Besidski Y., Csjernyik G., Nilsson L. I., Sandberg L., Yngve U., Åhlin K., Bueters T., Eriksson A. B., Lund P.-E., Venyike E., Oerther S., Blakeman K. H., Luo L., Arvidsson P., J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 6866–6880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lunn M. R., Root D. E., Martino A. M., Flaherty S. P., Kelley B. P., Coovert D. D., Burghes A. H., thi Man N., Morris G. E., Zhou J., Androphy E. J., Sumner C. J., Stockwell B. R., Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1489–1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.For reviews see:
  • 15a. Boltukhina E. V., Zubkov F. I., Varlamov A. V., Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2006, 42, 831–857; [Google Scholar]
  • 15b. Speck K., Magauer T., Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2048–2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15c.For a few examples of multistep synthesis of isoindolinones: Moody C. J., Warrellow G. J., Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6089–6092; [Google Scholar]
  • 15d. Couture A., Deniau E., Grandclaudon P., Hoarau C., J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3128–3132; [Google Scholar]
  • 15e. Padwa A., Beall L. S., Eidell C. K., Worsencroft K. J., J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2414–2421; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15f. Rys V., Couture A., Deniau E., Grandclaudon P., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1231–1237; [Google Scholar]
  • 15g. Sahakitpichan P., Ruchirawat S., Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4169–4172; [Google Scholar]
  • 15h. Onozaki Y., Kurono N., Senboku H., Tokudo M., Orito K., J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5486–5495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.For few examples see:
  • 16a. Deniau E., Enders D., Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2347–2350; [Google Scholar]
  • 16b. Chen M.-D., Zhou X., He M.-Z., Ruan Y.-P., Huang P.-Q., Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1651–1657; [Google Scholar]
  • 16c. Stajer G., Csende F., Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 1277–1286; [Google Scholar]
  • 16d. Glavac D., Dokli I., Gredicak M., Curr. Org. Chem. 2017, 21, 1335–1340; [Google Scholar]
  • 16e. Anamimoghadam O., Mumtaz S., Nietsch A., Saya G., Motti C. A., Wang J., Junk P. C., Qureshi A. M., Oelgemöller M., Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2833–2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.For recent reviews related to isoindolinone synthesis, see:
  • 17a. Di Mola A., Palombi L., Massa A., Targ. Heterocycl. Chem. 2014, 18, 113–140; [Google Scholar]
  • 17b. Meazza M., Companyó X., Rios R., Chem. Asian J. 2018, 7, 1934–1956; [Google Scholar]
  • 17c. Chanda T., Zhao J. C.-G., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 2–79; [Google Scholar]
  • 17d. Varvounis G., Gerontitis I. E., Gkalpinos V., Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2018, 54, 249–268; [Google Scholar]
  • 17e. Liu Z., Zhang Y., Green Techniques for Organic Synthesis and Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Eds.: Zhang W., Cue B. W.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2018, Chapter 7; [Google Scholar]
  • 17f. Gao W., Chen M.-W., Ding Q., Peng Y., Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14, 1306–1322; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17g. Gabriele B., Mancuso R., Veltri L., Ziccarelli I., Ca’ N. D., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 5073–5092; [Google Scholar]
  • 17h. Youn S. W., Synthesis 2020, 52, 807–818. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. 
  • 18a. Sharma U., Kancherla R., Naveen T., Agasti S., Maiti D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11895–11899; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 12089–12093; [Google Scholar]
  • 18b. Kancherla R., Naveen T., Maiti D., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8723–8726; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18c. Kancherla R., Naveen T., Maiti D., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8360–8364; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18d. Shaikh T. M., Hong F.-E., J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 801, 139–156; [Google Scholar]
  • 18e. Thrimurtulu N., Dey A., Maiti D., Volla C. M. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12361–12365; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 12549–12553; [Google Scholar]
  • 18f. Muralirajan K., Cheng C.-H., Rh-Catalyzed Synthesis of Nitrogen-Containing Heterocycles in Transition Metal-Catalyzed Heterocycle Synthesis via C−H Activation (Ed.: Wu X.-F.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2016, Chapter 5; [Google Scholar]
  • 18g. Fairlamb I. J. S., Kapdi A. R., Directed C−H Bond Functionalization Strategies for Synthesis in Strategies for Palladium-Catalyzed Non-Directed and Directed C−H Bond Functionalization, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 9–48; [Google Scholar]
  • 18h. Agasti S., Dey A., Maiti D., Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6544–6556; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18i. Wang R., Xie X., Liu H., Zhou Y., Catalysts 2019, 9, 823. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhu C., Falk J. R., Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1214–1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Youn S. W., Ko T. Y., Kim Y. H., Kim Y. A., Org Lett. 2018, 20, 7869–7874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Li D.-D., Yuan T.-T., Wang G.-W., Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12789–12791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wrigglesworth J. W., Cox B., Lloyd-Jones G. C., Booker-Milburn K. I., Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5326–5329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Xia C., White A. J. P., Hii K. K. M., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 7931–7938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Laha J. L., Hunjan M. K., Bhinpuria R. A., Kathuria D., Bharatam P. V., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 7346–7352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Liang H.-W., Ding W., Jiang K., Shuai L., Yuan Y., Wei Y., Chen Y.-C., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2764–2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Liu Y.-J., xu H., Kong W.-J., Shang M., Dai H.-X., Yu J.-Q., Nature 2014, 515, 389–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wang D., Cai S., Ben R., Zhou Y., Li X., Zhao J., Wei W., Qian Y., Synthesis 2014, 46, 2045–2050. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yu Q., Zhang N., Huang J., Lu S., Zhu Y., Yu X., Zhao K., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 11184–11188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yang L., Han L., Zhao L., Zhou J., Zhang H., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 62–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kumar P., Gupta M., Bhadur B., Parmar V. S., Singh B. K., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 1552–1558. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yuan M., Sun Y., Yan H., Wu J., Ma G., Li F., Miao S., Li N., Heterocycles 2016, 3, 560–572. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jing K., Wang X.-N., Wang G.-W., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 161–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang F., Song G., Li X., Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5430–5433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Patureau F. W., Besset T., Glorius F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1064–1067; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lu Y., Wang H.-W., Spangler J. E., Chen K., Cui P.-P., Zhao Y., Sun W.-Y., Yu J.-Q., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1923–1927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wang S.-M., Li C., Leng J., Bukhari S. N. A., Qin H.-L., Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ramesh B., Tamizmani M., Jeganmohan M., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 4058–4071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. 
  • 38a. Zhu C., Falck J. R., Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1674–1676; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38b. Zhu C., Falck J. R., Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 9192–9199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ji W.-W., Lin E., Li Q., Wang H., Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5665–5668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu H., Song S., Wang C.-Q., Feng C., Loh T.-P., ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 58–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wang C.-Q., Ye L., Feng C., Loh T.-P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1762–1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhou Z., Liu G., Lu X., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 5668–5671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zhou X., Peng Z., Zhao H., Zhang Z., Lu P., Wang Y., Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10676–10679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhou X., Zhang Z., Zhao H., Lu P., Wang Y., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 3787–3797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hong S. Y., Jeong J., Chang S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2408–2412; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 2448–2452. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sun J., Bai D., Wang P., Wang K., Zheng G., Li X., Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1789–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wu X., Wang B., Zhou Y., Liu H., Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1294–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Xu Y., Wang F., Yu S., Li X., Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 1390–1398. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wu S., Wu X., Fu X., Ma S., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2831–2834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wang L., Liu X., Liu J.-B., Shen J., Chen Q., He M.-Y., Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 765–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhang Y., Zhu H., Huang Y., Hu Q., He Y., Yihang W., Zhu G., Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1273–1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Yuan T., Pi C., You C., Cui X., Du S., Wan T., Wu Y., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 163–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhu C., Xie W., Falck J. R., Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12591–12595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hyster T. K., Ruhl K. E., Rovis T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5364–5367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Lam H.-W., Man K.-Y., Chan W.-W., Zhou Z., Yu W.-Y., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 4112–4116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zhang Y., Wang D., Cui S., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2494–2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wang Z.-Q., Feng C.-G., Xu M.-H., Lin G.-Q., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5336–5337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ye B., Cramer N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7896–7899; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 8030–8033. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Li T., Zhou C., Yan X., Wang J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4048–4052; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 4112–4116. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cui W.-J., Wu Z.-J., Cu Q., You S.-L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7379–7385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hashimoto Y., Ueyeama T., Fukutani T., Hirano K., Satoh T., Miura M., Chem. Lett. 2011, 40, 1165–1166. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Bechtoldt A., Tirler C., Raghuvanshi K., Warratz S., Kornhaaß C., Ackermann L., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 264–267; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 272–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Miura H., Terajime S., Tsutsui K., Shishido T., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 1231–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Miura H., Kimura Y., Terajima S., Shishido T., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2807–2811. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Manoharan R., Jeganmohan M., Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2929–2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Reddy M. C., Jeganmohan M., Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4130–4135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wu X., Wang B., Zhou S., Zhou Y., Liu H., ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2494–2499. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Reddy M. C., Jeganmohan M., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 4866–4869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Li X. G., Sun M., Liu K., Liu P. N., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Nagarjuna Reddy K., Subhadra U., Sridhar B., Subba Reddy B. V., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 2522–2526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zheng X.-X., Du C., Zhao X.-M., Zhu X., Suo J.-F., Hao X.-Q., Niu J.-L., Song M.-P., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 4002–4011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Chen S.-Q., Jiao J.-Y., Zhang X.-G., Zhang X.-H., Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 246–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Shi Y., Li M.-S., Zhang F., Chen B., RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 28668–28675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Hao W., Tian J., Li W., Shi R., Huang Z., Lei A., Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 1664–1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Wang H.-L., Shang M., Sun S.-Z., Zhou Z.-L., Laforteza B. N., Yu J.-Q., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1228–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Yu H., Xuan P., Lin J., Jiao M., Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 3636–3641. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Takamatsu K., Hirano K., Miura M., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4066–4069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Zhang J., Chen H., Lin C., Liu Z., Wang C., Zhang Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 12990–12996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Zhang L.-B., Hao X.-Q., Liu Z.-J., Zheng X.-X., Zhang S.-K., Niu J.-L., Song M.-P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10012–10015; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 10150–10153. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ma W., Ackermann L., ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2822–2825. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Manoharan R., Jeganmohan M., Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5884–5887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhou X., Xu H., Yang Q., Chen H., Wang S., Zhao H., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 8603–8606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Xu M., Yuan Y., Wang Y., Tao Q., Wang C., Li Y., Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6264–6269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Gu Z.-Y., Liu C.-G., Wang S.-Y., Ji S.-J., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 2223–2230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Zou F., Chen Z., Hao W., Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 758–763. [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kalsi D., Barsu N., Dahiya P., Sundararaju B., Synthesis 2017, 49, 3937–3944. [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Kalsi D., Barsu N., Sundararaju B., Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 2360–2364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Chen J., Jin L., Zhou J., Jiang X., Yu C., Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 2054–2058. [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zhao H., Shao X., Qing Z., Wang T., Chen X., Yang H., Zhai H., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 1678–1682. [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Sau S. C., Mei R., Struwe J., Ackermann L., ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 3023–3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis (Eds.: Negishi E.-i., de Meijere A.), Wiley, New York, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Hellal M., Cuny G. D., Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 5508–5511. [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Hari Balakrishnan M., Mannathan S., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 542–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Mendoza-Pérez E., Vázquez A., Heterocycl. Commun. 2018, 24, 129–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ratushnyy M., Kvasovs N., Sarkar S., Gevorgyan V., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10316–10320; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 10402–10406. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Newman S. G., Howell J. K., Nicolaus N., Lautens M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14916–14919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Lalji R. S. K., Kumar P., Gupta M., Parmar V. S., Singh B. K., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 552–560. [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Butani H. H., Vachhani D. D., Bhoya U. C., Shah A. K., Van der Eycken E. V., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 6634–6638. [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Nallapati S. B., Adepu R., Ashfaq M. A., Sreenivas B. Y., Mukkanti K., Pal M., RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 88686–88691. [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Lee B.-J., Hong G.-P., Kim G., Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 5348–5350. [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Zhao L., Li Z., Chang L., Xu J., Yao H., Wu X., Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2066–2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Shen C., Liu R.-R., Fan R.-J., Li Y.-L., Xu T.-F., Gao J.-R., Jia Y.-X., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4936–4939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Douki K., Ono H., Taniguchi T., Shimokawa J., Kitamura M., Fukuyama T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14578–14581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Wang J., Liu Y., Xiong Z., Zhong L., Ding S., Li L., Zhao H., Chen C., Shang Y., Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3249–3252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Liang R.-X., Xu D.-Y., Yang F.-M., Jia Y.-X., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 7711–7714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Li X., Zhou B., Yang R.-Z., Yang F.-M., Liang R.-X., Liu R.-R., Jia Y.-X., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13945–13951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Yang P., You S.-L., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7684–7688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Weng J.-Q., Xing L.-L., Hou W.-R., Liang R.-X., Jia Y.-X., Org. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 1577–1580. [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Liu R.-R., Xu T. F., Wang Y.-G., Xiang B., Gao J.-R., Jia Y.-X., Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13664–13667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. 
  • 110a. Liu R.-R., Wang Y.-G., Li Y.-L., Huang B.-B., Liang R.-X., Jia Y.-X., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7475–7478; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 7583–7586; [Google Scholar]
  • 110b. Chen S., Wu X.-X., Wang J., Hao X.-H., Xia Y., Shen Y., Jing H., Liang Y.-M., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4016–4019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Petrone D. A., Yen A., Zeidan N., Lautens M., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4838–4841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Petrone D. A., Kondo M., Zeidan N., Lautens M., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 5684–5691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Shen C., Zeidan N., Wu Q., Breuers C. B. J., Liu R.-R., Jia Y.-X., Lautens M., Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3118–3122. [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Zeidan N., Beisel T., Ross R., Lautens M., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7332–7335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Liang R.-X., Wang K., Wu Q., Sheng W.-J., Jia Y.-X., Organometallics 2019, 38, 3927–3930. [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Pathare R. S., Sharma S., Elagandhula S., Saini V., Sawant D. M., Yadav M., Sharon A., Khan S., Pardasani R. T., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5579–5587. [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Tyagi V., Khan S., Chauhan P. M. S., Synlett 2013, 24, 645–651. [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Shacklady-McAtee D. M., Dasgupta S., Watson M. P., Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3490–3493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Qin X., Lee M. W. Y., Zhou J. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12723–12726; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 12897–12900. [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Marchese A. D., Lind F., Mahon A. E., Yoon H., Lautens M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5095–5099; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 5149–5153. [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Tyagi V., Khan S., Chauhan P. M. S., Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1279–1284. [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Sarkar S., Pal R., Sen A. K., Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 4273–7276. [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Kavala V., Wang C.-Y., Wang C.-C., Patil P. B., Fang C. C., Kuo C.-W., Yao C.-F., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 988–998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Dumas A. M., Sieradzki A. J., Donnelly L. J., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1848–1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Yoshinaga Y., Yamamoto T., Suginome M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7251–7255; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 7318–7322. [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Irudayanathan F. M., Noh J., Choi J., Lee S., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3433–3442. [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Irudayanathan F. M., Oh J., Lee S., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2015, 36, 1745–1746. [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Zhang L., Zhang Y., Wang X., Shen J., Molecules 2013, 18, 654–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Gogoi A., Guin S., Rout S. K., Majji G., Patel B. K., RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 59902–59907. [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Villuri B. K., Kotipalli T., Kavala V., Ichake S. S., Bandi V., Kuo C.-W., Yao C.-F., RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74845–74858. [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Munoz S. B., Aloia A. N., Moore A. K., Papp A., Mathew T., Fustero S., Olah G. A., Prakash G. K. S., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Hazarika D., Phukan P., ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 2474–2478. [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Saini H. K., Nandwana N. K., Dhiman S., Rangan K., Kumar A., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 7277–7282. [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Saini H. K., Dhiman S., Nandwana N. K., Krishnan R., Kumar A., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 4281–4290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Arai S., Sato Y., Ito N., Nishida A., Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151314. [Google Scholar]
  • 136. 
  • 136a. Gabriele B., Mancuso R., Salerno G., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 6825–6839; [Google Scholar]
  • 136b. Wu X.-F., Neumann H., Beller M., Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 1–35; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136c. Shen C., Wu X.-F., Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2973–2987; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136d. Perrone S., Troisi L., Salomone A., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 4626–4643. [Google Scholar]
  • 137. 
  • 137a. Gabriele B., Mancuso R., Ziccarelli I., Salerno G., Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 6694–6696; [Google Scholar]
  • 137b. Mancuso R., Ziccarelli I., Armentano D., Marino N., Giofré S. V., Gabriele B., J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 3506–3518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Xu Y., Hu W., Tang X., Zhao J., Wu W., Jiang H., Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6843–6846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Wang C., Zhang L., Chen C., Han J., Yao Y., Zhao Y., Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 4610–4614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Zhang X., Ding Y., Gao, Li Y. S., Li G., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2595–2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Cheng X.-F., Wang T., Li Y., Wu Y., Sheng J., Wang R., Li C., Bian K.-J., Wang X.-S., Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6530–6533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Guo S., Wang F., Sun L., Zhang X., Fan X., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 2537–3545. [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Yan K., Jiu J., Kong Y., Li B., Wang B., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 3080–3085. [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Marosvölgyi-Haskó D., Takács A., Riedl Z., Kollár L., Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Han C., Shen Y., Lu P., Wang Y., Chin. J. Chem. 2013, 31, 182–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Ju J., Qi C., Zheng L., Hua R., Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 5159–5161. [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Xuang Z., Jung D. J., Jeon H. J., Lee S.-G., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 10094–10098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Natte K., Chen J., Li H., Neumann H., Beller M., Wu X.-F., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 14184–14188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Yoo J. M., Ho S. L., Cho C. S., Synlett 2016, 27, 1383–1386. [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Guo S., Tao L., Wang F., Fan X., Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 3090–3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Liu B., Lai C., Zhang C., Zhou X., Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 752–757. [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Han Q., Fu S., Zhang X., Lin S., Huang Q., Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 4165–4169. [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Kim D. Y., Dao P. D. Q., Yoon N. S., Cho C. S., Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019, 8, 1726–1731. [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Barrio P., Ibáñez I., Herrera L., Román R., Catalán S., Fustero S., Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11579–11584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Liu B., Wang Y., Liao B., Zhang C., Zhou X., Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 5776–5780. [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Guo S., Zhai J., Wang F., Fan X., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 3674–3680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Guo S., Wang F., Liu Y., Fan X., Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 3355–3360. [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Miura S., Fukuda K., Masada S., Usutani H., Kanematsu M., Cork D. G., Kawamoto T., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 8166–8174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Wang H., Wu X.-F., Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5264–5268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Wang Z., Zhu F., Li Y., Wu X.-F., ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Bal Reddy C., Ram S., Kumar A., Bharti R., Das P., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 4067–4071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Fu L.-Y., Ying J., Qi X., Peng J.-B., Wu Z.-F., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 1421–1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Ying J., Gao Q., Wu X.-F., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 14297–14305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Jing K., Cui P.-C., Wang G.-W., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12551–12554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Čarný T., Markovič M., Gracza T., Koóš P., J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 12499–12507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Dong W., Xu G., Tang W., Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 3239–3247. [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Bai X.-F., Mu Q.-C., Xu Z., Yang K.-F., Li L., Zheng Z.-J., Xia C.-G., Xu L.-W., ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1431–1436. [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Gao B., Liu S., Lan Y., Huang H., Organometallics 2016, 35, 1480–1487. [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Huang Q., Han Q., Fu S., Yao Z., Su L., Zhang X., Lin S., Xiang S., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 12135–12142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Fujioka M., Morimoto T., Tsumagari T., Tanimoto H., Nishiyama Y., Kakiuchi K., J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 2911–2923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Zhou B., Hou W., Yang Y., Li Y., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 4701–4706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Han J., Wang N., Huang Z.-B., Zhao Y., Shi D.-Q., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6831–6839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Tjutrins J., Shao J. L., Yempally V., Bengali A. A., Arndtsen B. A., Organometallics 2015, 34, 1802–1805. [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Ling F., Ai C., Lv Y., Zhong W., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 3707–3712. [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Lukasevics L., Cizikovs A., Grigorjeva L., Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 2720–2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Dhanasekaran S., Kayet A., Suneja A., Bisai V., Singh V. K., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2780–2783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Chen T., Cai C., New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 2519–2522. [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Dhanasekaran S., Suneja A., Bisai V., Singh V. K., Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 634–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Chen T., Cai C., Catal. Commun. 2016, 74, 119–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Dhanasekaran S., Bisai V., Unhale R. A., Suneja A., Singh V. K., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 6068–6071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Zhang L., Kim J. B., Jang D. O., Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 2654–2658. [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Liu M., Li J., Zhang Q., Shi D., Heterocycles 2015, 97, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Karmakar R., Suneja A., Bisai V., Singh V. K., Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5650–5653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. 
  • 184a. Liu L., Qiang J., Bai S.-H., Sung H.-L., Miao C.-B., Li J., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1283–1289; [Google Scholar]
  • 184b. Liu L., Bai S. H., Li Y., Wang L.-X., Hu Y., Hu Y., Sung H.-L., Li J., J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 11084–11090; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184c. Liu L., Bai S. H., Li Y., Ding X. D., Liu Q., Li J., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1617–1621; [Google Scholar]
  • 184d. Li J., Bai S. H., Li Y., Wang Z. B., Huo X. Y., Liu L., J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 8780–8785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Sun L. X., Zeng T., Jiang D., Dai L.-Y., Li C.-J., Can. J. Chem. 2012, 90, 92–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Bisai V., Suneja A., Singh V. K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10737–10741; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 10913–10917. [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Suneja A., Bisai V., Singh V. K., J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 4779–4788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Kundu S. K., Kayet A., Baidya R., Satyanarayana L., Maiti D. K., ACS Omega 2020, 5, 394–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Zamani F., Babaahmadi R., Yates B. F., Gardiner M. G., Ariafard A., Pyne S. G., Hyland C. J. T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2114–2119; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 2136–2141. [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Foster R. W., Tame C. J., Hailes H. C., Sheppard T. D., Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 2353–2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Méndez-Gálvez C., Böhme M., Leino R., Savela R., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 1708–1719. [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Ling F., Li Z., Liu X., Ma C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10914–10917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Wertjes W. C., Wolfe L. C., Waller P. J., Kalyani D., Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5986–5989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Dai P., Ma J., Huang W., Chen W., Wu N., Wu S., Li Y., Cheng X., Tan R., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 802–809. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES