Abstract
Background
Acne is a common skin disease that can affect a person’s quality of life (QoL), self-esteem, and mood in an adverse manner. The aim of the current study was to assess QoL among Montenegrin pupils with acne.
Methods
This cross-sectional survey was conducted over October and November 2020 in four randomly selected secondary schools in Podgorica, Montenegro. All 500 pupils were asked to fill in a short questionnaire which included questions on age, sex, presence of acne, and for those with acne their duration and location, visits to doctors, presence of any other coexisting skin disease, and family history of acne. Only pupils who self-reported acne were asked to complete the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).
Results
Self reported acne were presented in 49.8% (249/500) of all pupils. The mean CDLQI score of the total sample was 4.27 ± 5.13. Overall, the CDLQI domains that were most affected by acne were symptoms and feelings (mean score 1.49 ± 1.43), leisure (mean score 0.94 ± 1.72), and treatment (0.66 ± 0.79). The mean total CADI score was 3.53 ± 3.11 which was higher in girls (4.07 ± 3.11) than in boys (2.90 ± 3.00). There was good correlation between the two questionnaires (Rho = 0.76; P < 0.01). According to multiple linear regressions, higher overall CDLQI score was found in pupils with acne who reported other skin diseases, while girls, pupils who reported both acne on face and back, and who had any concomitant skin disease had higher CADI total score.
Conclusions
Acne affects QoL of young adolescents in Montenegro with greater impact in girls. Our findings should point out the importance of timely diagnosis, treatment, and education of adolescents with acne.
Introduction
Acne vulgaris, also known as acne, is one of the most common inflammatory dermatosis treated worldwide [1, 2]. The Global Burden of Disease study showed that acne was the 8th most prevalent disease globally in 2010 [3].
It is well known that acne is not just a trivial skin disease, but a psychosomatic disorder − a disease that involves both mind and body. Even mild to moderate disease can be associated with significant emotional and psychological issues such as depression and suicidal ideation often independent of the disease severity and greater than generally assumed [4].
Acne can affect people of all ages. Adolescents and young adults between ages 12 and 24 tend to be the most affected group [1]. About 90% of teenagers are affected by acne that usually occurs when adolescents are undergoing maximum physical and social transitions during a time of their low self-esteem and high concern about their physical appearance.
Numerous studies have confirmed that acne can negatively affect a person’s quality of life (QoL), self-esteem, and mood [5–12].
The present study aimed to assess health-related QoL among Montenegrin pupils with acne.
Materials and methods
This cross-sectional survey was conducted in four randomly selected secondary schools in Podgorica, Montenegro. The sample size (500) was calculated using the assumption of 95% CI, and marginal error of 5%, enlarged with consideration on the loss of response. The head teacher of each school was approached and gave agreement for the study to be conducted during school-time. An explanatory letter describing the intended research was sent to the parents of pupils a week before the questionnaires were distributed to allow time for permission or refusal of their child’s participation in the study. Data were collected over October and November 2020. On the day of data collection a further explanation of the research was given to the pupils by medical doctor. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. All 500 pupils were asked to fill in a short questionnaire which included questions on age, sex, presence of acne, and for those with acne their duration and location, visits to doctors, presence of any other coexisting skin disease, and family history of acne. Only pupils who self-reported acne (n = 249) were asked to complete the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) [13] and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) [14].
The CDLQI is a skin disease specific 10-items questionnaire which covers all aspects of QoL: symptoms and feelings (two items), leisure time (three items), school or holidays (one item), personal relationships (two items), sleep (one item) and treatment (one item) in the previous week. The responses to questions are graded from 0 to 3, with a possible maximum score of 30 with higher scores representing more severely affected QoL [13]. The following severity bands for CDLQI scores were used in the interpretation of QoL: 0−1 no effect on QoL, 2−6 small effect, 7−12 moderate effect, 13−18 very large effect, 19−30 extremely large effect [15].
The CADI is a brief acne-specific questionnaire designed for measuring disability induced by acne. It consists of five questions relating to the previous months that cover feelings, symptoms, social life and perceived severity. Each question has four possible response categories (0–3) with a total maximum score of 15. The higher score means that more QoL is impaired [14].
Both questionnaires, the CDLQI and the CADI were linguistically validated and culturally adapted from English to Serbian language [16, 17].
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Montenegro. The written informed consent was obtained from pupils’ parents.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages while continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The differences between variables were assessed by x2 or t-test. The Spearman Rho coefficient was used to examine the correlation between the CDLQI and the CADI questionnaires. Two multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed: the first one with the total CDLQI score as a dependent variable, and the second with the total CADI score as a dependent variable. Sex, disease duration, acne location, other skin disease, and family history of acne were independent variables in both analyses.
Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A two-tailed probability value of 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Self reported acne were presented in 49.8% (249/500) of all pupils (115 boys and 134 girls). One hundred and ten boys and 116 girls reported acne alone. Nine percent (23/249) reported acne and coexisting skin disease, more girls (13.4%) than boys (4.3%). Face was the most dominant location (61.4%). Family history of acne was present in more than a half of all pupils (57.4%). Almost 80% of respondents with acne did not seek medical help (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of study population.
| Characteristic | Total sample (N = 249) | Boys (N = 115) | Girls (N = 134) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (mean ± SD) | 15.05 ± 0.51 | 15.16 ± 0.59 | 14.96 ± 0.40 | 0.002* |
| Disease duration | ||||
| Less than 1 year | 91 (36.5%) | 45 (39.1%) | 46 (34.3%) | n.s. |
| More than 1 year | 158 (63.5%) | 70 (60.9%) | 88 (65.7%) | |
| Acne location | ||||
| Only face | 153 (61.4%) | 72 (62.6%) | 81 (60.4%) | n.s. |
| Only back | 11 (4.4%) | 3 (2.6%) | 8 (6.0%) | |
| Face and back | 85 (34.1%) | 40 (34.8) | 45 (33.6%) | |
| Other skin disease | ||||
| Yes | 23 (9.2%) | 5 (4.3%) | 18 (13.4%) | 0.028** |
| No | 226 (90.8%) | 110 (95.7%) | 116 (86.6%) | |
| Family history of acne | ||||
| Yes | 143 (57.4%) | 66 (57.4%) | 77 (57.5%) | n.s. |
| No | 106 (42.6%) | 49 (42.6%) | 57 (42.5%) | |
| Visited doctor | ||||
| Yes | 50 (20.1%) | 18 (15.7%) | 32 (23.9%) | n.s. |
| No | 199 (79.9%) | 97 (84.3%) | 102 (76.1%) |
*t-test
**Chi-square test.
The overall CDLQI and CADI scores, and scores for CDLQI domains and CADI items, according to sex are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) domains and Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) according to sex (mean ± SD).
| CDLQI | Total sample | Boys | Girls | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms and feelings (items 1 and 2) | 1.49 ± 1.43 | 1.41 ± 1.43 | 1.57 ± 1.43 | n.s. |
| Personal relationships (items 3 and 8) | 0.55 ± 1.07 | 0.51 ± 1.12 | 0.57 ± 1.04 | n.s. |
| Leisure (items 4, 5 and 6) | 0.94 ± 1.72 | 0.77 ± 1.56 | 1.09 ± 1.85 | n.s. |
| School or holiday (item 7) | 0.40 ± 0.73 | 0.39 ± 0.73 | 0.41 ± 0.73 | n.s. |
| Sleep (item 9) | 0.23 ± 0.60 | 0.22 ± 0.63 | 0.25 ± 0.57 | n.s. |
| Treatment (item10) | 0.66 ± 0.79 | 0.63 ± 0.78 | 0.69 ± 0.80 | n.s. |
| Total score | 4.27 ± 5.13 | 3.93 ± 5.24 | 4.57 ± 5.04 | n.s. |
| CADI | ||||
| Feelings and symptoms (item 1) | 0.78 ± 0.78 | 0.57 ± 0.73 | 0.96 ± 0.77 | <0.0001 |
| Personal relationships (item 2) | 0.53 ± 0.78 | 0.43 ± 0.70 | 0.60 ± 0.83 | n.s. |
| Avoidance of swimming (item 3) | 0.31 ± 0.63 | 0.26 ± 0.62 | 0.36 ± 0.64 | n.s. |
| Feelings about the appearance of skin (item 4) | 0.94 ± 0.81 | 0.77 ± 0.82 | 1.10 ± 0.77 | 0.001 |
| Perceived severity (item 5) | 0.97 ± 0.75 | 0.87 ± 0.76 | 1.07 ± 0.73 | 0.045 |
| Total score | 3.53 ± 3.11 | 2.90 ± 3.00 | 4.07 ± 3.11 | 0.003 |
*t-test.
The mean CDLQI score of the total sample was 4.27 ± 5.13. Overall, the CDLQI domains that were most affected by acne were symptoms and feelings (mean score 1.49 ± 1.43), leisure (mean score 0.94 ± 1.72), and treatment (0.66 ± 0.79). There were no statistically significant differences between boys and girls neither in total CDLQI scores, nor in CDLQI domain scores (Table 2).
According to severity bands for CDLQI scores the effect of acne on QoL was small in most pupils (43.4%), moderate in 12.9, and large in 8.4%. More than one-third of pupils (35.3%) reported no effects on QoL.
The mean total CADI score was 3.53 ± 3.11 which was higher in girls (4.07 ± 3.11) than in boys (2.90 ± 3.00). There were also statistically significant differences between girls and boys in feelings and symptoms, feelings about the appearance of skin, and perceived severity with higher mean scores in girls (Table 2).
Sixty percent of pupils with acne in this study experienced symptoms and almost one-half (47%) was emotionally affected. Thirty eight percent of pupils were affected in their personal and social lives of whom 11% were moderately to severely affected. Sixty eight percent of all pupils with acne was concerned about the appearance of their skin of which 45% were occasionally concerned. However, 9 pupils (3.6%) felt very depressed and miserable. Even 24% of pupils avoided swimming because of their skin trouble. Eight percent of pupils felt their acne affected very much or quite a lot their school work and 13% of pupils had experienced bullying because of their acne. Acne-related sleep problems were reported by 16% of pupils and almost one-half of pupils (49%) reported problem because of the treatment for their acne. For more than one half of pupils (52.6%) their acne was a minor problem, while for 18.1% it was a major problem. However, a small but important minority (3%) were thought their acne was the worst it could possibly be.
Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the CDLQI domains and the CADI items ranged between 0.312 and 0.584. The highest correlations were seen between feelings about the appearance of skin and perceived severity (Rho = 0.722; P < 0.01), and symptoms and feelings and feelings about appearance of skin (Rho = 0.672; P < 0.01) for items of the CADI; and between symptoms and feelings and personal relationships (Rho = 0.553; P < 0.01) and leisure and treatment (Rho = 0.515; P < 0.01) for CDLQI domains (Table 3).
Table 3. Correlation matrix of Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and Cardiff Acne Disability Index scores (CADI).
| CADI | CDLQI | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CADI 1 | CADI 2 | CADI 3 | CADI 4 | CADI 5 | SF | Leisure | S/H | PR | Sleep | |
| CDLQI | ||||||||||
| Treatment | 0.515* | 0.494* | 0.341* | 0.502* | 0.548* | 0.499* | 0.515* | 0.397* | 0.512* | 0.363* |
| Sleep | 0.320* | 0.312* | 0.324* | 0.330* | 0.331* | 0.413* | 0.340* | 0.342* | 0.367* | |
| PR | 0.463* | 0.570* | 0.518* | 0.497* | 0.466* | 0.553* | 0.466* | 0.485* | ||
| S/H | 0.392* | 0.348* | 0.389* | 0.406* | 0.377* | 0.486* | 0.350* | |||
| Leisure | 0.478* | 0.530* | 0.423* | 0.542* | 0.505* | 0.506* | ||||
| SF | 0.496* | 0.479* | 0.451* | 0.584* | 0.552* | |||||
| CADI | ||||||||||
| CADI 5 | 0.608* | 0.530* | 0.499* | 0.722* | ||||||
| CADI 4 | 0.672* | 0.613* | 0.528* | |||||||
| CADI 3 | 0.431* | 0.554* | ||||||||
| CADI 2 | 0.586* | |||||||||
* P < 0.01 SF: Symptoms & feelings; S/H: School/holiday; PR: Personal relationships. CADI 1: Feelings and symptoms; CADI 2: Personal relationships; CADI 3: Avoidance of swimming; CADI 4: Feelings about the appearance of skin; CADI 5: Perceived severity.
There was a strong linear correlation between the mean scores of two questionnaires (Rho = 0.763; P < 0.01).
According to multiple linear regressions, higher overall CDLQI score was found in pupils with acne who reported other skin diseases (B = 4.792; CI = 2.601 − 6.983), while girls, pupils who reported both acne on face and back, and who had any concomitant skin disease (B = 2.374; CI = 1.052 − 3.642) had higher CADI total score (Table 4).
Table 4. Predictive value of characteristics of pupils with acne in relation to QoL measures.
| Score | Characteristic | B | 95% CI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDLQI | Sex | 0.199 | -1.050 | 1.448 | 0.754 |
| Disease duration | -0.085 | -1.440 | 1.270 | 0.902 | |
| Acne location | 0.678 | -0.025 | 1.382 | 0.059 | |
| Other skin disease | 4.792 | 2.601 | 6.983 | 0.000 | |
| Family history of acne | -0.410 | -1.685 | 0.865 | 0.527 | |
| CADI | Sex | 0.945 | 0.207 | 1.683 | 0.012 |
| Disease duration | 0.304 | -0.497 | 1.105 | 0.456 | |
| Acne location | 0.647 | 0.231 | 1.063 | 0.002 | |
| Other skin disease | 2.347 | 1.052 | 3.642 | <0.0001 | |
| Family history of acne | -0.047 | -0.800 | 0.707 | 0.903 | |
B: unstandardized regression coefficient; CDLQI: Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index; CADI: Cardiff Acne Disability Index.
Discussion
To our knowledge, similar research concerning impairment of health-related QoL in young adults with acne was not conducted in Montenegro. The prevalence of self-reported acne in the present study was about 50%, confirming previous findings that acne is common in adolescents. The frequency of acne in our study is similar to the findings in Serbian [18] and a Greek study [19], higher than in the Egyptian study [12], but significantly lower than in most other studies [5, 7–9, 12, 20, 21].
In this cross-sectional study, the QoL of Montenegrin pupils with acne was assessed using two instruments, the CDLQI, dermatology-specific, and CADI, acne-specific questionnaire. Although the overall mean scores for both the CDLQI (4.27; maximum score possible 30) and the CADI (3.53; maximum score possible 15) are pretty low, our study confirms that acne is associated with significant impairment in QoL. The reason for relatively low scores may be the predominance of clinically mild acne in the community setting.
Olsen et al. [22] in a meta-analysis related to the impact on the QoL of children’s skin conditions, reported that the overall estimated CDLQI score for acne (mean score 5.3) was in the sixth place after scabies (9.2), urticaria (7.1), atopic eczema (8.5), psoriasis (8.0), and vitiligo (6.5). The total CADI mean score (3.53) found in this study is in agreement with the results from previous studies conducted in Serbia [9, 23], somewhat higher than in the Scottish study [5], but significantly lower than in several other studies [12, 24, 25]. Sampogna et al. reported that the only skin diseases that had a greater psychosocial impact than acne were hyperhidrosis, hirsutism, ectoparasitic infections, and bullous diseases [26].
Although most pupils in this study were found to experience none or small and moderate effect of acne on QoL, important 8.4% of all pupils experienced large (6%) and extremely large effect (2.4%). The meta-analysis of studies where the distributions of CDLQI scores were provided found that 1–5% of children with acne experienced a very large impact on QoL [22].
In the present study, almost half (47%) of pupils were emotionally affected. The interaction of acne and psychosocial problems is complex and can cause negative emotional reactions, such as anxiety, helplessness and frustration, depression, and even suicidal ideation which can lead to impaired QoL and self-esteem [10, 27, 28]. Several previous studies also reported significantly increased psychological burden in acne patients [29–33]. Pawin et al. [6] reported that 58.2% of patients with acne felt lonely, and 56.5% felt anxious. The data from national survey of youth health conducted in New Zealand (Youth 2000), pointed out that acne was associated with an increased probability of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and suicide attempts [34]. Our study suggests that young people presenting with acne are vulnerable to psychological problems. Therefore, it is important to detect such problems early and offer effective therapy to prevent their progression.
Adolescence is an important period, both for identity and social development. In this study, 38% of pupils were affected in their personal and social lives of whom 11% were moderately to severely affected. In the French study, nearly half of acne patients (48%) reported that their daily lives were affected [6]. It is important to identify and treat teenagers with acne early to reduce the future socio-economic burden of their acne. Pupils need to be informed that acne can be treated.
In our study girls were reported to experience a greater impact on QoL than boys although statistically significant difference was seen only for the CADI total score and for the CADI items feelings and symptoms, and feelings about the appearance of skin. This indicates that the psychological impact of acne may be greater for females than it is for males. Similarly, several studies found that girls are more susceptible than boys to the negative psychological effects of acne [9, 35–40]. However, Greek and Egyptian authors did not find any difference in QoL between male and female adolescents affected with acne [10, 12].
Our finding that pupils with coexisting skin diseases had more impaired QoL is in line with the finding from a Serbian study of 478 pupils of the secondary railway-technical school [9].
Only a few studies analyzed the association between family history and QoL in patients with acne. Guo et al. [41] reported that patients with skin diseases (including acne) with a family history, were more likely to affect the QoL for 2.221 (95% CI 1.333–3.703) times than those without a family history. The possibility of acne affecting QoL in the same study was 1.219 (95% CI 0.589–2.520) times that of patients with psoriasis. Indian authors found a statistically significant correlation between family history and DLQI/CADI scores [42] and concluded that family history played a role in affecting the QoL. In the present study, we did not find any statistically significant association between family history of acne and CDLQI/CADI scores.
The impact of duration of acne on QoL was analyzed in several studies. In a Brazilian study subjects with shorter acne duration presented significantly higher scores of the Acne-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL), i.e. better QoL [43]. In contrast, Tan et al. [40] reported that a greater impact on QoL, evaluated with the same questionnaire (Acne-QoL), was associated with longer acne duration. We did not find any significant correlation between acne duration and QoL.
Our study confirmed a strong correlation between the CDLQI and CADI questionnaires. Pupils who scored highly on the CDLQI also tended to score highly on the CADI which is in agreement with previous studies [5, 9].
The strength of the present study was a representative sample of young adolescents surveyed from the general population. However, cross sectional design of study may introduce biases associated with self-reporting such as misclassification bias and under- or over-reporting of information. In addition, QoL instruments used in this study are not sufficient to diagnose psychological disorders without clinical assessment through interview of the affected pupils.
Nevertheless, despite these limitations, the current study confirms the negative impact of acne on the QoL of Montenegrin teenagers, and the high psychosocial burden in some of them. Therefore, we recommend that more attention should be paid to the psychological problems of the pupils with acne, to detect them early and offer effective therapy.
This study also has shown a strong correlation between the CDLQI and CADI. In addition, both QoL instruments were easily understood and quickly completed by pupils with acne.
Supporting information
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Andrew Finlay, and Dr. Mohammad Basra, Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK, for the formal permission to translate and use the CDLQI and CADI in this study.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja RS, project No 200110). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Global Acne Market Report for 2016–2026. 2018. Available at: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05251482
- 2.Zouboulis CC. Acne and sebaceous gland function. Clin Dermatol. 2004;22: 360–366. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380: 2163–2196. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Niemeier V, Kupfer J, Gieler U. Acne Is Not a Trivial Disease! Psychosomatic Aspects in Routine Therapy. Dermatol Psychosom. 2002;3: 61–70. 10.1007/s00105-002-0380-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walker N, Lewis-Jones MS. Quality of life and acne in Scottish adolescent schoolchildren: use of the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(1): 45–50. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01344.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pawin H, Chivot M, Beylot C, Faure M, Poli F, Revuz J, et al. Living with acne. A study of adolescents’ personal experiences. Dermatology. 2007;215(4): 308–314. 10.1159/000107624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Uslu G, Sendur N, Uslu M, Savk E, Karaman G, Eskin M. Acne: prevalence, perceptions and effects on psychological health among adolescents in Aydin, Turkey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(4): 462–469. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02497.x Epub 2007 Dec 20. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kubota Y, Shirahige Y, Nakai K, Katsuura J, Moriue T, Yoneda K. Community-based epidemiological study of psychosocial effects of acne in Japanese adolescents. J Dermatol. 2010;37(7): 617–622. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00855.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jankovic S, Vukicevic J, Djordjevic S, Jankovic J, Marinkovic J. Quality of life among schoolchildren with acne: results of a cross-sectional study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012;78(4): 454–458. 10.4103/0378-6323.98076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tasoula E, Gregoriou S, Chalikias J, Lazarou D, Danopoulou I, Katsambas A, et al. The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents in Greece. Results of a population survey. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(6): 862–869. 10.1590/s0365-05962012000600007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eyüboglu M, Kalay I, Eyüboglu D. Evaluation of Adolescents Diagnosed with Acne Vulgaris for Quality of Life and Psychosocial Challenges. Indian J Dermatol. 2018;63(2): 131–135. 10.4103/ijd.IJD_671_16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tayel K, Attia M, Agamia N, Fadl N. Acne vulgaris: prevalence, severity, and impact on quality of life and self-esteem among Egyptian adolescents. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2020;95(1): 30. 10.1186/s42506-020-00056-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lewis-Jones MS, Finlay AY. The Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): Initial validation and practical use. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132(6): 942–949. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Motley RJ, Finlay AY: Practical use of a disability index in the routine management of acne. Clin Exp Dermatol 1992;17(1): 1–3. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb02521.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Waters A, Sandhu D, Beattie P, Ezughah F, Lewis-Jones S. Severity stratification of Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) scores. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163 (Suppl 1): S121. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Janković S, Vukićević J, Djordjević S, Janković J, Marinković J, Erić M. The Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): linguistic and cultural validation in Serbian. J Cutan Med Surg. 2013;17(5): 316–320. 10.2310/7750.2013.12114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jankovic S, Vukicevic J, Djordjevic S, Jankovic J, Marinkovic J, Basra MK. The Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI): linguistic and cultural validation in Serbian. Qual Life Res 2012;22(1): 161–166. 10.1007/s11136-012-0136-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reljić V, Maksimović N, Janković J, Mijović B, Perić J, Janković S. Evaluation of the quality of life in adolescents with acne. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(7): 634–638. 10.2298/vsp1407634r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rigopoulos D, Gregoriou S, Ifandi A, Efastathiou G, Georgala S, Chalkias J, et al. Coping with acne: beliefs and perceptions in sample of secondary school Greek pupils. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007; 21(6): 806–810. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02091.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yeung CK, Teo LH, Xiang LH, Chan HH. A community based epidemiological study of acne vulgaris in Hong Kong adolescents. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82: 104–107. 10.1080/00015550252948121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yosipovitch G, Tang M, Dawn AG, Chen M, Goh CL, Chan YH, et al. Study of Psychological Stress, Sebum Production and Acne Vulgaris in Adolescents. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007; 87(2): 135–139. 10.2340/00015555-0231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Olsen JR, Gallacher J, Finlay AY, Piguet V, Francis NA. Quality of life impact of childhood skin conditions measured using the children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI): a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(43): 853–861. 10.1111/bjd.14361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perić J, Maksimović N, Janković J, Mijović B, Reljić V, Janković S. Prevalence and quality of life in high school pupils with acne in Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013;70(10): 935–939. 10.2298/vsp1310935p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aghaei S, Mazharinia N, Jafari P, Abbasfard Z. The Persian version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index. Reliability and validity study. Saudi Med J. 2006;27: 80–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yap FB. Cardiff acne disability index in Sarawak, Malaysia. Ann Dermatol. 2012;24(2): 158–161. 10.5021/ad.2012.24.2.158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sampogna F, Tabolli S, Abeni D. Impact of different skin conditions on quality of life. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2013;148: 255–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Do JE, Cho SM, In SI, Lim KY, Lee S, Lee ES. Psychosocial aspects of acne vulgaris: a community-based study with Korean adolescents. Ann Dermatol 2009; 12: 125–129. 10.5021/ad.2009.21.2.125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dunn LK, O’Neill JL, Feldman SR. Acne in adolescents: quality of life, self esteem, mood, and psychological disorders. Dermatol Online J. 2011; 17(1): 1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yazici K, Baz K, Yazici AE, Köktürk A, Tot S, Demirseren D, et al. Disease-specific quality of life is associated with anxiety and depression in patients with acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18(4): 435–439. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00946.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rapp DA, Brenes GA, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB Jr, Graham GF, Dailey M, et al. Anger and acne: implications for quality of life, patient satisfaction and clinical care. Br J Dermatol. 2004;151(1): 183–189. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06078.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hahm BJ, Min SU, Yoon MY, Shin YW, Kim JS, Jung JY, et al. Changes of psychiatric parameters and their relationships by oral isotretinoin in acne patients. J Dermatol. 2009;36(5): 255–261. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00635.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bowe WP, Doyle AK, Crerand CE, Margolis DJ, Shalita AR. Body image disturbance in patients with acne vulgaris. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4: 35–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stamu-O’Brien C, Jafferany M, Carniciu S, Abdelmaksoud A. Psychodermatology of acne: Psychological aspects and effects of acne vulgaris. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020. 10.1111/jocd.13765 Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Purvis D, Robinson E, Merry S, Watson P. Acne, anxiety, depression and suicide in teenagers: a cross-sectional survey of New Zealand secondary school students. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(12): 793–796. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00979.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Aktan S, Ozmen E, Sanli B. Anxiety, depression and nature of acne vulgaris in adolescents. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39: 354–357. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00907.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krowchuk DP, Stancin T, Keskinen R, Walker R, Bass J, Anglin TM. The psychosocial effects of acne on adolescents. Pediatr Dermatol 1991;8: 332–338. 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1991.tb00945.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Berg M, Lindberg M. Possible gender differences in the quality of life and choice of therapy in acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 25: 969–972. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03907.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Safizadeh H, Shamsi-Meymandy S, Naeimi A. Quality of life in Iranian patients with acne. Dermatol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 571516. 10.1155/2012/571516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zauli S, Caracciolo S, Borghi A, Ricci M, Giari S, Virgili A, et al. Which factors influence quality of life in acne patients? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(1): 46–50. 10.1111/jdv.12053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tan JK, Li Y, Fung K, Gupta AK, Thomas DR, Sapra S, et al. Divergence of demographic factors associated with clinical severity compared with quality of life impact in acne. J Cutan Med Surg. 2008;12(5): 235–242. 10.2310/7750.2008.07053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guo F, Yu Q, Liu Z, Zhang C, Li P, Xu Y, et al. Evaluation of life quality, anxiety, and depression in patients with skin diseases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(44):e22983. 10.1097/MD.0000000000022983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Durai PC, Nair DG. Acne vulgaris and quality of life among young adults in South India. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(1): 33–40. 10.4103/0019-5154.147784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kamamoto Cde S, Hassun KM, Bagatin E, Tomimori J. Acne-specific quality of life questionnaire (Acne-QoL): translation, cultural adaptation and validation into Brazilian-Portuguese language. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89(1): 83–90. 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(XLS)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.