Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249770

Distribution of naturally -occurring NS5B resistance-associated substitutions in Egyptian patients with chronic Hepatitis C

Hala Rady Ahmed 1, Nancy G F M Waly 1, Rehab Mahmoud Abd El-Baky 1,2,*, Ramadan Yahia 2, Helal F Hetta 3,4, Amr M Elsayed 5, Reham Ali Ibrahem 1
Editor: Philippe Gallay6
PMCID: PMC8049381  PMID: 33857212

Abstract

Background

NS5B polymerase inhibitors represent the cornerstone of the present treatment of Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). Naturally occurring substitution mutations to NS5B inhibitors have been recorded. The current study intended to demonstrate possible natural direct acting antiviral (DAA)—mutations of the HCV NS5B region in HCV patients in Minia governorate, Egypt.

Methods

Samples were collected from 27 treatment-naïve HCV patients and 8 non-responders. Out of 27 treatment-naïve patients, 17 NS5B sequences (amino acids 221–345) from treatment-naïve patients and one sample of non-responders were successfully amplified. Nucleotide sequences have been aligned, translated into amino acids, and compared to drug resistance mutations reported in the literature.

Results

NS5B amino acid sequence analysis ensures several novel NS5B mutations existence (more than 40 substitution mutations) that have not been previously documented to be correlated with a resistant phenotype. It was found that K304R (82.4%), E327D and P300T (76.5% each) substitutions were the most distributed in the tested samples, respectively. S282T, the major resistance mutation that induces high sofosbuvir-resistance level in addition to other reported mutations (L320F/C) and (C316Y/N) were not recognized. Q309R mutation is a ribavirin-associated resistance, which was recognized in one strain (5.9%) of genotype 1g sequences. Besides, one substitution mutation (E237G) was identified in the successfully amplified non-responder sample.

Conclusion

Our study showed various combinations of mutations in the analyzed NS5B genes which could enhance the possibility of therapy failure in patients administered regimens including multiple DAA.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a viral pandemic, expresses the most prevalent blood-borne viral infection that preferentially replicates in the liver [1, 2]. It is the main reason for chronic viral hepatitis that might lead to critical liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [3, 4]. Global HCV predominance varies around the world [5]. Egypt reports the highest HCV predominance worldwide [68]. Overall, the epidemiology of HCV is evolved because of a scale-up in screening and prevention actions and elevated cure rates in the time of interferon-free DAA therapy [9]. HCV is marked by genetic heterogeneity, with at least 7 major genotypes are classified [10]. In Egypt, genotype 4 is the predominant genotype, comprising 90% of the infected Egyptians [1113]. However, GT-4 is a very heterogeneous genotype with high genetic diversity and more subtypes compared with other genotypes. Nowadays, 18 subtypes of HCV-4 have been identified, with 4a as the dominant subtype [14, 15].

HCV is a positive-sensed single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the Flaviviridae family. The genome of HCV involves 9000 to 9800 nucleotides which encode structural and non-structural proteins. The viral particle forms of structural proteins, core and the envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2. The structural proteins separate apart from the non-structural proteins by the short membrane peptide p7 [1618].

NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B are the non-structural proteins which included in viral replication and viral polyprotein processing. NS5B functions as RNA-dependent RNA (RdRp) polymerase, synthesizing RNA using an RNA template [19, 20]. In 2011, the Directly Acting Antivirals (DAA) appeared as a chief development in HCV therapy. These drugs targeted the viral proteins involved in viral replication [21]. DAAs treat HCV infections with a smaller management period, elevated cure rates, and fewer side effects. Amongst DAA drugs, sofosbuvir is a nucleotide analog HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitor, as the National Committee for the Control of Viral Hepatitis adopted which was verified to be an effective treatment with SVR rates approaching 95% and used as orally (60 mg once per day) [2225].

Resistance Associated Substitutions (RASs) are natural substitutions that account for different degrees of resistance to DAAs and pose a great challenge to the effectiveness of HCV antiviral therapy [26, 27]. The RASs can happen naturally in patients infected with HCV before starting DAA treatment [28]. In all studies, Sofosbuvir (SOF) revealed a great genetic barrier. However, limited substitutions with resistance to SOF were noticed in NS5B [2931].

In this study, we demonstrated possible natural direct-acting antiviral (DAA)—mutations of the HCV NS5B region in HCV patients in Minia governorate, Egypt.

2. Patients and methods

2.1 Patients and sample collection

Blood specimens were collected between January 2019 and August 2019, 27 from randomly selected treatment-naïve HCV infected patients and 8 non-responders at Viral Hepatitis Management Center, Minia governorate, Upper Egypt, Egypt. Specimens were collected as part of the routine work of the central laboratory. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975, Declaration of Helsinki, as revealed in a priori approval (No. 65/2019) by commission of the ethics of scientific research, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia university. The baseline HCV RNA levels were assessed before the initiation of HCV antiviral therapy and the results were available as the routine workup for diagnosis and management of HCV infection in patients’ records. The HCV-RNA was amplified on Stratagene Mx3000P system using Artus HCV QS-RGQ-PCR Kit. Amplification followed by simultaneous detection was carried out using RT-PCR, with TaqMan assay for a particular region of the HCV genome. The lower limit of detection for the assay is 30 IU/ml.

2.2 Viral RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Approximately, 3 ml of blood were collected from each patient, the samples were shipped cooled (4°C) within 6 hours, centrifuged at 1500 rpm, and sera were separated then distributed in aliquots, stored at -20°C.

Viral RNA was collected from patients’ sera using QIAamp DSP virus Kit (cat#60704, Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentrations of nucleic acid were determined by NanoDrop™ 1000 Spectrophotometer V3.7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA). Then after RNA extraction the eluted RNA was stored at -80°C until further use. The cDNA strand was synthesized from the extracted HCV RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (cat#4368814, Applied Biosystems, USA).

2.3 Amplification of NS5B gene by Nested Polymerase Chain Reactions (Nested PCR)

The primers utilized for NS5B amplifications and DNA sequencing are JA230, 5\-TACCATCATGGCTAA(A/G)AA(C/T)-GAGGT (outer sense, 8008–8032); JA233,5\-ATGATGTTATGAGCTCCA(A/G)GTC(A/G)TA (outer antisense, 8663–8687); JA231, 5\TATGA(C/T)ACCCGCTG(C/T)TTTGAC (inner sense, 8256–8276); and JA232, 5\-CCTGGTCATAGCCTCCGTGAA (inner antisense, 8616–8636) [32]. These primers were utilized in a standard single-tube RT-outer PCR with 1.5 mM MgCl2. The temperature was optimized at 42°C for 60 min, then by 95°C for 5 min, then thermo-cycling for 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The inner PCR was done under the same thermo-cycling conditions, utilizing the inner sense primers.

PCR negative samples were extracted again using The MagMAX Viral RNA Isolation Kit for viral nucleic acid isolation which used to deliver yields of high quality RNA and DNA with little sample-to-sample variation as 35–75% of the input RNA should be recovered. The MagMAX™ magnetic bead technology is useful for concentrating RNA from diluted samples. Then, the PCR tried a second time but gave no bands.

2.4 Purification of PCR product and sequencing

Purification of PCR products was performed using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (250) (cat#28106, Qiagen, Germany). The purified NS5B PCR products were sequenced utilizing the Big Dye Terminator V 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (cat#4337455, applied biosystems, USA) on the automated sequencer genetic analyzers.

2.5 Analysis of NS5B partial gene sequences

The NS5B gene sequences were analyzed for genotyping, amino acid sequence identification and mutations utilizing the data and tools available at the Genafor- Open Services for Medical Research Website (https://www.genafor.org/index.php). A phylogenetic tree was performed based on the assessment of the HCV NS5B sequences with reference strains. The MEGA 6 software was used for the phylogenetic analysis. The reported sequences through this study have been submitted to the GenBank database under accession MN794403, MN894516, MN794406, MN794404, MN794405, MN794407, MN794408, MN794409, MN794410, MN794411, MN794412, MN894517, MN794413, MN794414, MN794415, MN794416, MN794417 and MW307936.

3. Results

Clinical and virological features of patients involved in this study are summarized in Table 1. The current study involved 35 patients (27 treatment-naïve HCV patients and 8 non-responders (who failed to attain an early viral response associating combined sofosbuvir (400mg/day), daclatasvir (60mg/day) for 6 months therapy)). Out of 27 treatment-naïve patients, 17 were male and 10 were female with ages ranged between 23 and 75 years old. For non-responders, 7 patients were male, and one patient was female.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the tested treatment-naïve HCV patients and non-responders.

ID Age (years) Gender ALT Up To 40U/L Platelet count X103 (150–400) PC % (70–110%) Viral load X 105 (IU/ml) WBCs Count 103/mm3 (4000–11000) Hg g/dL female:12–14 male:13–15
A. Treatment-naïve patients
1 75 M 23 166 75 19 7.2 14.2
2 53 M 49 250 97 15.8 4.2 11
3 60 F 55 115 65 5.5 5.8 14.5
4 50 F 36 210 78 1.82 8.1 12.1
5 23 M 29 219 78 14.8 8.4 14.9
6 58 M 118 168 76 11 5.7 14.8
7 70 M 28 201 84 1.12 5.4 17.3
8 58 M 22 174 87 64.9 5.1 12.9
9 29 F 29 207 97 0.41 5.9 11.4
10 58 M 31 148 64 10.3 6.3 13.3
11 64 M 48 177 88 5.2 3.9 13.5
12 67 M 27 156 85 12.6 6.8 14.7
13 55 F 141 154 76 2.2 5.2 13.4
14 74 M 136 185 97 5.63 5.2 16.8
15 65 M 29 134 69 14.1 5.4 15.1
16 34 M 25 247 80 5.45 4.1 13
17 32 M 28 210 90 2.94 6.1 15.9
18 58 M 105 172 75 10.3 6.7 14.1
19 56 M 36 186 80 0.55 5.9 14.4
20 69 M 37 175 77.5 0.753 4.2 13.5
21 38 M 67 215 90 1.07 6.3 16.2
22 26 F 26 176 75 0.93 5.6 11.5
23 33 F 38 125 75 1.03 4.9 11.6
24 62 F 34 184 82 0.895 5.6 12.2
25 54 F 36 105 65 10.5 3.4 11.7
26 55 F 32 168 75 0.791 4.8 11.2
27 56 F 38 183 77.5 0.697 3.9 11.8
B. Non-responders:
28 57 M 56 115 62 1.75 5.2 15.1
29 27 M 26 220 87 0.72 6.2 14.8
30 47 M 31 195 82 0.98 7.3 14.5
31 53 M 29 176 80 0.87 5.8 13.9
32 52 M 23 216 77.5 0.64 5.7 13.2
33 63 M 25 135 62 12 3.8 12.8
34 73 M 33 165 75 0.91 4.7 13.1
35 49 F 93 92 55 1.1 3.5 10.8

ALT: alanine aminotransferase, WBCs: White blood cells count, PC: Prothrombine Concentration, Hg: hemoglobin

Regarding the baseline features of the tested treatment-naïve patients, it was observed that ALT and Platelet counts displayed abnormal level in 8/27 and 4/27 patients, respectively. Declined levels of WBCs count and prothrombin activity were shown in 3/27 and 5/27 patients, respectively. On the other hand, 8/27 patients displayed abnormal hemoglobin level (Table 1). For non-responders, it was detected that 5/8 patients displayed normal levels of all experienced variables. In addition, variable clinical characteristics were observed in 3/8 patients.

In this study, the success rate of amplification for NS5B fragments was 17/27 of the collected treatment-naïve patients’ samples and one sample of the collected non-responders samples that could be attributed to the difficulty to amplify NS5B fragments, low viral load and RNA level in most of the unsuccessfully amplified samples, requirement of extremely trained professionals and longer turnaround time [3234].

Most treatment-naïve patients in our study were genotyped as HCV genotype-4a 13/17 (76.5%), Subtype 3a and 4l were both identified in one sample (5.9%), and subtype 1g was recognized in 2/17 samples (11.7%). The only amplified sample of the non-responders was genotype 4o. To study substitutions along NS5B protein, Egyptian HCV amino acid sequences were aligned to the NS5B world consensus sequences. The relationship amongst the sequences isolates was shown in the phylogenetic tree (Fig 1). In Egypt, the major NS5B polymerase inhibitor [nucleoside inhibitor (NI)] available is SOF. So, we mainly examined the positions having resistance associated variants (RAVs) to SOF. Other positions, 368, 411, 414, 448 and 553 correlated to another NS5B polymerase inhibitor resistance, Dasabuvir (non-nucleoside inhibitor (NNI)) were not included in this study.

Fig 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method.

Fig 1

The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the General Time Reversible model [35]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-2845.8745) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G, parameter = 0.2970)). The rate variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I], 0.0000% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 23 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st. There were a total of 593 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [36].

The significant S282T mutation (accompanying extreme level of resistance to SOF) as well as other mutations that are formerly documented with resistance to SOF (L320F/C) and (C316Y/N) were not detected in the successfully amplified specimens. while various novel NS5B mutations that have not been formerly announced to be correlated with a resistant phenotype were determined. As 5 amino acid substitutions (K304R, E327D, P300T, R270K and N333S/R/A) were set to be the most abundant RASs in the treatment-naïve patients. Only one substitution mutation (E237G) was recognized in the successfully amplified specimen of non-responders (Table 2).

Table 2. Frequency of different HCV NS5B amino acid substitutions mutations among the tested treatment-naïve patients and non-responders.

Substitution mutations No of cases (%)
Treatment-naïve patients (n = 17)
K304R 14 (82.4)
E327D 13 (76.5)
P300T 13 (76.5)
R270K 11 (64.7)
N333S/R/A 10 (58.8)
R231K 9 (52.9)
V252A 8 (47)
Y285F 7 (41.2)
T254A 5 (29.4)
A235V/T 4 (23.5)
E237G/A 4 (23.5)
M343L/N/I 3 (17.6)
H267Y/R 3 (17.6)
I303T/L 3 (17.6)
K270R 2 (11.7)
L293M 2 (11.7)
I251V 2 (11.7)
R254K 2 (11.7)
K307G/R 2 (11.7)
A231G 1 (5.8)
T235M 1 (5.8)
A252V 1 (5.8)
A255S 1 (5.8)
N255S 1 (5.8)
T257S 1 (5.8)
D272E 1 (5.8)
L273F 1 (5.8)
T286P 1 (5.8)
M300T 1 (5.8)
A302S 1 (5.8)
V285F 1 (5.8)
N307G 1 (5.8)
Q309R 1 (5.8)
R337G 1 (5.8)
A342V 1 (5.8)
T344D 1 (5.8)
R345Q 1 (5.8)
V322I 1 (5.8)
G333A 1 (5.8)
L336I 1 (5.8)
N244D 1(5.8)
D244A 1 (5.8)
Non-responders (n = 1)
E237G 1 (100)

Mutations associated with ribavirin resistance were examined at positions D244N, Q309R, and A333E of NS5B. The Q309R mutation was recognized in one strain (5.6%) of genotype 1g. In this study, mutations of D244N and A333E were not found in any sequence, However N333S/R/A and G333A polymorphisms were recognized in 10 (58.8%) and 1 (5.8%) of 17 treatment-naïve specimens’ sequences. Other mutations, D310N and T329I which are associated with peg-IFN/RBV resistance were not detected in any of the examined sequences (Table 2). The presence of combinations of many substitutions in one sample was found in the tested treatment-naïve patients. As 5 to 10 substitution mutations was the most prevalent (47%) among the tested samples of the treatment-naïve patients followed by the presence of combinations of 10 to 15 substitutions (41.1%). However, only one mutation was observed in the successfully amplified sample of a non-responder patient (Table 3).

Table 3. Number of NS5B substitutions per case.

Number of substitutions mutation Number of cases (%)
Treatment-naïve patients (n = 17)
less than 5 substitutions 2 (11.7)
[≥ 5 to < 10] substitutions 8 (47)
[≥ 10 to <15] substitutions 7 (41.1)
More than 15 substitutions 0 (0)
Non-responders (n = 1)
less than 5 substitutions 1 (100)

Table 4 displayed the distribution of amino acids substitution mutations in treatment-naïve patients of 4a genotype. As Combinations of R231K, P300T, K304R, E327D were common between most of the examined treatment-naïve patients.

Table 4. Distribution of different amino acids mutations in NS5B in treatment-naïve patients and non-responders of different HCV genotype.

Accession ID Genotype No. of MUTATIONS
No. Subtype substitutions
Treatment-naïve patients
MN794403 1 3a 3 N244D K304R N307G
MN894516 2 4a 7 R231K E237A R270K Y285F P300T K304R E327D
MN794406 3 4a 10 R231K V252A T254A R270K T286P P300T K304R V322I E327D N333S
MN794404 4 4a 12 E237G T254A A255S R270K L293M P300T K304R E327D N333R R337G A342V M343L
MN794405 5 4a 7 R231K V252A Y285F P300T K304R E327D N333S
MN794407 6 4a 7 R231K R270K Y285F P300T K304R E327D N333S
MN794408 7 4a 8 R231K A235V V252A R270K Y285F P300T K304R E327D
MN794409 8 4a 13 A235T E237G D244A V252A H267Y R270K L273F L293M P300T I303L K304R E327D N333A
MN794410 9 4a 7 R231K V252A T254A R270K P300T K304R E327D
MN794411 10 4a 10 R231K V252A T254A R270K V285F P300T K304R E327D N333S M343I
MN794412 11 1g 6 A231G I251V R254K N255S K270R K307R
MN894517 12 4i 3 K270R M300T G333A
MN794413 13 4a 11 R231K A235V V252A T254A R270K Y285F P300T K304R E327D N333S L336I
MN794414 14 4a 10 A235V V252A H267Y R270K Y285F P300T I303T K304R E327D N333S
MN794415 15 4a 10 R231K E237G P300T I303T K304R E327D N333S M343N T344D R345Q
MN794416 16 1g 8 T235M I251V A252V R254K T257S A302S K307G Q309R
MN794417 17 4a 9 A235T H267R R270K D272E Y285F P300T K304R E327D N333S
Non-responders
MW307936 28 4o 1 E237D

For samples with multiple mutations, it was detected that specimen with ID 8 found to have 13 substitution mutation sites whose patient of 58 years old representing normal clinical properties. Patient’s sample with ID 4 displayed 12 substitution mutation sites presenting abnormal level of ALT only. Patient’s specimen with ID 13 revealed 11 substitution mutations sites and found to have abnormal level of ALT only. In addition, variable clinical properties were detected in patients’ samples IDs 3, 10, 14, 15 expressing 10 mutations which indicates that no associations between the number of substitutions and the clinical features of the patients.

4. Discussion

Although DAA interferon-free treatment displayed a vital development in HCV treatment, the residence of the virus under drug pressure and the residence of natural polymorphism that might be correlated with resistance to DAAs are considered a high challenge to the success in HCV treatment.

Our study was done on 27 treatment-naïve patients and 8 non-responders. The non-responders showed low viral load in comparison to treatment-naïve patients. This because the virus was under the stress of the antiviral therapy resulting in decrease in the replication of the virus and low viral load. In addition, many patients under the antiviral therapy may show inaccurate low viral load or false negativity when testing plasma for HCV RNA due to the presence of HCV distributed in hepatic tissues and in extrahepatic tissues such as pancreas, kidney, brain, lymphoid tissues or elsewhere. So, direct testing of these tissues in individuals who test negatively for HCV RNA in blood will be required. These tissue sites could serve as potential reservoirs of persistent HCV infection and a viral relapse source [3740].

Seventeen specimens of treatment-naïve patients and one specimen of non-responders were successfully amplified for the examined NS5B fragments. To our consideration, this study is one of few studies, which estimated NS5B RASs naturally occurring in DAA-naïve HCV patients in the Egyptian community. In order to provide optimal therapy, especially in non-responders, population surveillance to identify the baseline prevalence of HCV direct resistance mutations (DRMs), such as S282T, is important. Although deep sequencing was used to study NS5B regions, these studies either failed to examine DRMs; restricted by homogeneity of the HCV subtype; or small cohorts of infected individuals were used [4143].

Concerning NS5B gene, the global analysis revealed that NS5B DAA resistance substitutions are infrequent [44]. In our study relevant natural aa polymorphisms were observed in genotypes 4a, 4l, 3a, 1g and 4o. In the NS5B region, some studies have shown the appearance of naturally occurring mutations. A study from Argentina on 108 HCV‐1‐infected patients, NS5B RASs were detected in 6.3% [45]. Moreover, another study showed that the prevalence of RASs at baseline was 20.9% in 43 HCV strains underwent extra analysis of the HCV NS5B by next generation sequencing [46]. Despite, an Italian study described that from 45 HCV GT3a patients 0% was harboring known RAS at baseline for NS5B [47]. Another study revealed that out of 10 investigated genotype 1a strains, 5 strains had mutations in codons K304, A327, S254, and N307 [48]. Also, multiple substitutions at the same aa positions were detected among our HCV strains.

Concerning mutations associated with ribavirin resistance at positions Q309R, D244N, and A333E, a study performed in Brazil reported that among 69 drug-naïve individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, the most common mutation was Q309R (29%) [49]. These results extend and consolidate previous study which displayed the high prevalence of the Q309R mutation [49]. However, this mutation (Q309R) was reported in one (5.6%) of our cases.

Additionally, a study on 42 HCV sequences recorded that D244N mutation was not detected. A333E mutation was recognized in 11 (50%) sequences of genotype 5a. Other peg-IFN/RBV resistance-associated mutations, D310N and T329I, were not detected in the examined sequences [49]. These findings to some extent resemble our results, as these mutations were not recognized in our strains. Whereas N333S/R/A polymorphisms were identified in 10 of 18 strains (55.6%), both D244A and N244D polymorphisms were recognized in only one strain (5.6%).

Another study found that the resistant mutation (A300T) showed high distribution between genotype 1b strains (82.7%) [50]. Additionally, a study performed on 16 naive HCV/HIV-1 coinfected patients, recorded substitutions on amino acid at position 300 (A300T, A300S, R300Q) [41]. Among our strain’s multiple substitutions, P300T (72.2%) and M300T (5.6%), were identified at the same position.

Significant S282T mutation that induce a high level of SOF resistance as well as other recorded mutations that are clinically significant in SOF resistance (L320F/C) and (C316Y/N) were not recognized in any of our examined sequences. These findings agree with those observed in other studies which found that the S282T mutation show low prevalence among HCV patients [41, 42]. Furthermore, larger studies concerning HCV patients with genotypes 1, 2, and 3 Failed to detect the S282T mutation between treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced individuals [29, 5154]. Also, many studies displayed that the emergence of S282T substitution was limited in patients who fail SOF-based regimens [55, 56]. Furthermore, S282T substitution was not reported in a study performed on 127 HCV-positive specimens of the Canadian cohort while S282G/C/R substitutions were recognized in nine patients [57]. Another study reported that 5 patients (38.5%) showing treatment failure harbored NS5B S282C/T RASs [58].

Our study reported the NS5B RAS E237G in the only non-responsive HCV GT-4o strain and E237G/A mutations in another 4 strains of our naive HCV specimens. This outcome agrees to some extend with a study on 333 patients who received therapy, ten patients had a virological relapse, E237G mutation was detected in two patients with genotype 1a and genotype 4d at the time of relapse [59]. Another study recorded the presence of E237G substitution in one patient of GT- 4 with no significant therapeutic response [60].

Some novel baseline NS5B polymorphisms may not influence therapy outcomes, as they have not been enriched in post-failure specimens. While baseline resistant variants might cause viral breakthroughs during therapy. The effect of HCV-resistance mutations on the capacity of the virus to replicate in-vivo remains unclear. Additional studies are required for better assessment of the impact of all variants on modulating resistance levels or susceptibility to HCV drugs.

Study limitations and future recommendations

  • The small number of the analyzed samples, especially the non-responders: The number of non-responders is very low due to the high rate of virological success of SOF-based regimens. Additionally, many HCV Egyptian patients received the treatment at private clinics and pharmacies outside the viral hepatitis management center so it was hard to reach them to be included in our study.

  • Lack of comparison with other cohort of patients who achieved an early viral response: There were difficulties following up the patients after the end of treatment. We tried to follow up our cases responsiveness to the treatment but failed. In Egypt, the routine follow-up depends mainly on performing RT-PCR to detect the viral load every 6 months, then every year. So, patients can perform this test in private laboratories outside the viral hepatitis management center.

  • The use of multiple DAAs but analyzing one target gene. Although daclatasvir targets NS5A, nothing was done on this gene as patients may be resistant to daclatasvir and this resistance was related to NS5A and not NS5B. This is because the sequencing step has a high cost, and this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

  • To undergo the alignment step, HCV GT-4a reference strain with accession number DQ988074, HCV GT-4l reference strain FJ839870, HCV GT-4o reference strain FJ462440, HCV GT-3a reference strain D17763 and HCV GT-1g reference strain AM910652 from NCBI were chosen to be aligned with the sequenced samples. As a result, for the alignment, we noticed the presence of the mutations or the substitutions listed in our study in the tested samples and their absence in the reference strains. So, further investigations are needed to prove their relation to resistance.

5. Conclusion

Our study reported that there are many combinations of multiple aa substitutions in the analyzed NS5B genes which could enhance therapy failure possibility in HCV patients treated with regimens containing DAA. Overall, it may be difficult to fully understand the role of some of these substitutions, the high virological success rate of SOF-based regimens, the rare incidence of RAS in non-responsive patients, and the minimal data developed for RAS in genotype 4 patients compared to other genotypes.

Further studies are needed to test the relation between the reported substitutions in our study and HCV resistance.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Karoney MJ, Siika AM. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Africa: a review. Pan African medical journal. 2013;14(1). 10.11604/pamj.2013.14.44.2199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tabata K, Neufeldt CJ, Bartenschlager R. Hepatitis C virus replication. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2020;10(3):a037093. 10.1101/cshperspect.a037093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heim MH, Bochud P-Y, George J. Host–hepatitis C viral interactions: The role of genetics. Journal of hepatology. 2016;65(1):S22–S32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Na SK, Song B-C. Development and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with sustained virologic response after antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Clinical and molecular hepatology. 2019;25(3):234. 10.3350/cmh.2018.0108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Niya MHK, Salman-Tabar S, Bokharaei-Salim F, Behmanesh M, Keyvani H. Prevalence of resistant associated variants (RAVs) in the naïve HCV patient candidate for direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. Microbial pathogenesis. 2017;105:166–70. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.01.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blach S, Zeuzem S, Manns M, Altraif I, Duberg A-S, Muljono DH, et al. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2017;2(3):161–76. 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30181-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mekky MA, Sayed HI, Abdelmalek MO, Saleh MA, Osman OA, Osman HA, et al. Prevalence and predictors of occult hepatitis C virus infection among Egyptian patients who achieved sustained virologic response to sofosbuvir/daclatasvir therapy: a multi-center study. Infection and drug resistance. 2019;12:273. 10.2147/IDR.S181638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mekky MA, Abdel-Malek MO, Osman HA, Abdel-Aziz EM, Hashim A-KA, Hetta HF, et al. Efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/ribavirin in management of HCV genotype 4 and end-stage kidney disease. Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology. 2019;43(1):82–7. 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghany MG, Morgan TR, Panel AIHCG. Hepatitis C guidance 2019 update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases–Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2020;71(2):686–721. 10.1002/hep.31060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith DB, Bukh J, Kuiken C, Muerhoff AS, Rice CM, Stapleton JT, et al. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology. 2014;59(1):318–27. 10.1002/hep.26744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abdel-Aty M, Fouad M, Sallam MM, Elgohary EA, Ismael A, Nawara A, et al. Incidence of HCV induced—Esophageal varices in Egypt: Valuable knowledge using data mining analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(4). 10.1097/MD.0000000000005647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Breban R, Doss W, Esmat G, Elsayed M, Hellard M, Ayscue P, et al. Towards realistic estimates of HCV incidence in E gypt. Journal of viral hepatitis. 2013;20(4):294–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01650.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hetta HF, Elkady A, Morsy KH, Mohamed IS, Ibrahim MA. Serum level of IL17a among cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infected patients with incidence of diabetes mellitus. Egypt J Immunol. 2017;24(1):79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Simmonds P, Bukh J, Combet C, Deléage G, Enomoto N, Feinstone S, et al. Consensus proposals for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology. 2005;42(4):962–73. 10.1002/hep.20819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kamal SM, Nasser IA. Hepatitis C genotype 4: What we know and what we don’t yet know. Hepatology. 2008;47(4):1371–83. 10.1002/hep.22127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abdel-Hameed EA, Rouster SD, Ji H, Ulm A, Hetta HF, Anwar N, et al. Evaluating the role of cellular immune responses in the emergence of HCV NS3 resistance mutations during protease inhibitor therapy. Viral immunology. 2016;29(4):252–8. 10.1089/vim.2015.0093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mehta M, Hetta HF, Abdel-Hameed EA, Rouster SD, Hossain M, Mekky MA, et al. Association between IL28b rs12979860 single nucleotide polymorphism and the frequency of colonic T reg in chronically HCV-infected patients. Archives of virology. 2016;161(11):3161–9. 10.1007/s00705-016-3015-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abd Ellah NH, Tawfeek HM, John J, Hetta HF. Nanomedicine as a future therapeutic approach for Hepatitis C virus. Nanomedicine. 2019;14(11):1471–91. 10.2217/nnm-2018-0348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lavanchy D. Evolving epidemiology of hepatitis C virus. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2011;17(2):107–15. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03432.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Daw MA, Dau AA. Hepatitis C virus in Arab world: a state of concern. The Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012. 10.1100/2012/719494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Asselah T, Marcellin P. Direct acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: one pill a day for tomorrow. Liver International. 2012;32:88–102. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02699.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elsharkawy A, Fouad R, El Akel W, El Raziky M, Hassany M, Shiha G, et al. Sofosbuvir‐based treatment regimens: real life results of 14 409 chronic HCV genotype 4 patients in Egypt. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2017;45(5):681–7. 10.1111/apt.13923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kirby BJ, Symonds WT, Kearney BP, Mathias AA. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-interaction profile of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2015;54(7):677–90. 10.1007/s40262-015-0261-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koff R. the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir, a novel, oral nucleotide NS 5B polymerase inhibitor, in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2014;39(5):478–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Omar H, El Akel W, Elbaz T, El Kassas M, Elsaeed K, El Shazly H, et al. Generic daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in treatment of chronic hepatitis C: real‐world results from 18 378 patients in Egypt. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;47(3):421–31. 10.1111/apt.14428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen M, Ma Y, Chen H, Luo H, Dai J, Song L, et al. Multiple introduction and naturally occuring drug resistance of HCV among HIV-infected intravenous drug users in Yunnan: An origin of China’s HIV/HCV epidemics. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142543. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Makhlouf NA, Farouk M, Nafeh HM, Hasanain AFA, El-Mokhtar MA, Hetta HF, et al. NS34A resistance-associated substitutions in chronic hepatitis C in Upper Egypt and regression of liver fibrosis after direct-acting antiviral therapy. Egyptian Liver Journal. 2021;11(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alavian SM, Hajarizadeh B, Lankarani KB, Sharafi H, Daryani NE, Merat S, et al. Recommendations for the clinical management of hepatitis C in Iran: a consensus-based national guideline. Hepatitis monthly. 2016;16(8). 10.5812/hepatmon.guideline [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gane EJ, Stedman CA, Hyland RH, Ding X, Svarovskaia E, Symonds WT, et al. Nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for hepatitis C. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368(1):34–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P, Chojkier M, Gitlin N, Puoti M, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(20):1889–98. 10.1056/NEJMoa1402454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kowdley KV, Gordon SC, Reddy KR, Rossaro L, Bernstein DE, Lawitz E, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(20):1879–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Abdel-Hamid M, El-Daly M, Molnegren V, El-Kafrawy S, Abdel-Latif S, Esmat G, et al. Genetic diversity in hepatitis C virus in Egypt and possible association with hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of general virology. 2007;88(5):1526–31. 10.1099/vir.0.82626-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Z, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shao X, Luo Q, Cai Q, et al. Naturally occurring drug resistance associated variants to hepatitis C virus direct-acting antiviral agents in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1b-infected patients in China. Medicine. 2017;96(19). 10.1097/MD.0000000000006830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Warkad SD, Nimse SB, Song K-S, Kim T. HCV detection, discrimination, and genotyping technologies. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics: Oxford university press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30(12):2725–9. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gurakar A, Fagiuoli S, Faruki H, De Maria N, Balkan M, Van Thiel DH, et al. Utility of hepatitis C virus RNA determinations in hepatic tissue as an end point for interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1995;22(4 Pt 1):1109–12. 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90616-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hetta HF, Mekky MA, Khalil NK, Mohamed WA, El-Feky MA, Ahmed SH, et al. Extra-hepatic infection of hepatitis C virus in the colon tissue and its relationship with hepatitis C virus pathogenesis. Journal of medical microbiology. 2016;65(8):703. 10.1099/jmm.0.000272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hetta HF, Mekky MA, Khalil NK, Mohamed WA, El‐Feky MA, Ahmed SH, et al. Association of colonic regulatory T cells with hepatitis C virus pathogenesis and liver pathology. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2015;30(10):1543–51. 10.1111/jgh.12936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hetta HF, Mehta MJ, Shata MTM. Gut immune response in the presence of hepatitis C virus infection. World Journal of Immunology. 2014;4(2):52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Franco S, Casadellà M, Noguera-Julian M, Clotet B, Tural C, Paredes R, et al. No detection of the NS5B S282T mutation in treatment-naive genotype 1 HCV/HIV-1 coinfected patients using deep sequencing. Journal of clinical virology. 2013;58(4):726–9. 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Margeridon S, Le Pogam S, Liu T, Hanczaruk B, Simen B, Shulman N, et al. NO DETECTION OF VARIANTS BEARING NS5B S282T MERICITABINE (MCB) RESISTANCE MUTATION IN DAA TREATMENT-NAIVE HCV GENOTYPE 1 (G1)-INFECTED PATIENTS USING ULTRA-DEEP PYROSEQUENCING (UDPS): 348. Hepatology. 2011;54(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu S, Kanda T, Nakamoto S, Jiang X, Miyamura T, Nakatani SM, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus subgenotypes 1a and 1b in Japanese patients: ultra-deep sequencing analysis of HCV NS5B genotype-specific region. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73615. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Welzel TM, Bhardwaj N, Hedskog C, Chodavarapu K, Camus G, McNally J, et al. Global epidemiology of HCV subtypes and resistance-associated substitutions evaluated by sequencing-based subtype analyses. Journal of hepatology. 2017;67(2):224–36. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martínez AP, García G, Ridruejo E, Culasso AC, Pérez PS, Pereson MJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: Prevalence of NS5A and NS5B resistance‐associated substitutions in naïve patients from Argentina. Journal of medical virology. 2019;91(11):1970–8. 10.1002/jmv.25536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tameshkel FS, Niya MHK, Zamani F, Motamed N, Ajdarkosh H, Vafaeimanesh J, et al. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) at baseline of treatment in thalassemia patients: a referral center study. Archives of Virology. 2020;165(10):2193–203. 10.1007/s00705-020-04728-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bartolini B, Giombini E, Taibi C, Lionetti R, Montalbano M, Visco-Comandini U, et al. Characterization of naturally occurring NS5A and NS5B polymorphisms in patients infected with HCV genotype 3a treated with direct-acting antiviral agents. Viruses. 2017;9(8):212. 10.3390/v9080212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.ASADPOUR L, Rahimi DH, Houshmand RM. Study of NS5B gene mutations in hepatitis C virus genotype 1a in Guilan Province. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Castilho MCB, Martins AN, Horbach IS, Perez RdM, Figueiredo FAF, Pinto PdTA, et al. Association of hepatitis C virus NS5B variants with resistance to new antiviral drugs among untreated patients. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106(8):968–75. 10.1590/s0074-02762011000800011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Patiño-Galindo JÁ, Salvatierra K, González-Candelas F, López-Labrador FX. Comprehensive screening for naturally occurring hepatitis C virus resistance to direct-acting antivirals in the NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes in worldwide isolates of viral genotypes 1 to 6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2016;60(4):2402–16. 10.1128/AAC.02776-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jacobson IM, Gordon SC, Kowdley KV, Yoshida EM, Rodriguez-Torres M, Sulkowski MS, et al. Sofosbuvir for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 in patients without treatment options. New England journal of medicine. 2013;368(20):1867–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lawitz E, Lalezari JP, Hassanein T, Kowdley KV, Poordad FF, Sheikh AM, et al. Sofosbuvir in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive patients with genotypes 1, 2, and 3 hepatitis C infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2013;13(5):401–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70033-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D, Rodriguez-Torres M, Hassanein T, Gordon SC, et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368(20):1878–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Donaldson EF, Harrington PR, O’Rear JJ, Naeger LK. Clinical evidence and bioinformatics characterization of potential hepatitis C virus resistance pathways for sofosbuvir. Hepatology. 2015;61(1):56–65. 10.1002/hep.27375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gane EJ, Metivier S, Nahass R, Ryan M, Stedman CA, Svarovskaia ES, et al. The emergence of NS5B resistance associated substitution S282T after sofosbuvir‐based treatment. Hepatology communications. 2017;1(6):538–49. 10.1002/hep4.1060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Catalli L, Martens SK, Terrault NA, Reeves JD. Novel NS5B Resistance‐Associated Substitution Emerges Under Failing Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir Therapy. Clinical liver disease. 2019;13(3):74. 10.1002/cld.768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ji H, Kozak RA, Biondi MJ, Pilon R, Vallee D, Liang BB, et al. Next generation sequencing of the hepatitis C virus NS5B gene reveals potential novel S282 drug resistance mutations. Virology. 2015;477:1–9. 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fourati S, Rodriguez C, Hézode C, Soulier A, Ruiz I, Poiteau L, et al. Frequent antiviral treatment failures in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 4, subtype 4r. Hepatology. 2019;69(2):513–23. 10.1002/hep.30225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Manns M, Samuel D, Gane EJ, Mutimer D, McCaughan G, Buti M, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2016;16(6):685–97. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00052-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hedskog C, Parhy B, Chang S, Zeuzem S, Moreno C, Shafran SD, et al., editors. Identification of 19 novel hepatitis C virus subtypes—further expanding HCV classification. Open forum infectious diseases; 2019: Oxford University Press; US. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Philippe Gallay

1 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-39695

Distribution of naturally occurring NS5B resistant

associated substitutions among treatment naïve HCV Egyptian patients and non-responders

PLOS ONE

Dear Rehab Mahmoud Abd El-Baky,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Although the reviewers found your study relevant, some issues need to be addressed including the small number of analyzed samples, English editing, a too small NS5B region sequenced, to compare sequences to a set of HCV NS5B sequences, etc.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 14 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Philippe Gallay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found some minor occurrences of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), some of which you are an author, which needs to be addressed:

- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210740119300439?via%3Dihub

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications word-for-word, especially outside the methods section, is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to quote or rephrase the duplicated text and cite your sources for text outside the methods section. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a cross-sectional study of NS5B resistance mutations in Egypt. Given the very high prevalence of HCV in this part of the world, such studies are relevant. However, there are a number of significant limitations to this study.

Most importantly, the very small sample size is quite surprising, since there are clearly many more individuals that could have been included / studied.

The manuscript requires editing by a native English speaker and/or professional editing service.

How was HCV RNA quantified? What was the lower limit of detection for the assay?

Only 18 of the 35 patient samples could be amplified by PCR suggesting very low sample quality. Samples storage conditions should be stated explicitly.

Were the samples that were PCR negative then extracted again and the PCR tried a second time?

The authors have amplified only a small portion (~400 bases) of the entire NS5B region, representing a significant study limitation.

“normal” and “abnormal” levels for ALT and other clinical variables should be explicitly defined.

Are the authors comparing their sequences to a single NS5B consensus to identify mutations? If so, this approach has major limitations. The consensus may change with more or fewer sequences to generate the consensus, and minor – but important – mutations may be missed altogether. It is better to compare the query sequence to a set of HCV references (rather than to one) and then define a mutation as greater than X percentage of samples.

A phylogenetic tree must be included to show the relationship amongst the sequences isolates.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript authors analyzed the RASs occurrence in 17 treatment-naïve and 1 non-responder samples out of 35 total number of patients. Samples were collected from patients who failed to achieve an early viral response with combined sofosbuvir (400mg/day), daclatasvir (60mg/day) for 6 months therapy. Authors reported several mutations as possible RASs linked to SOF.

Although these mutations may be of a great value to understand DAA resistance, however, the study lack important aspects that need to be addressed to be publishable. Examples for these shortcomings are the small number of the analyzed samples especially the non-responders, lack of comparison with other cohort of patients who achieved an early viral response, and the use of multiple DAAs but analyzing one target gene. Although daclatasvir targets NS5A, nothing was done on this gene as patients may be resistant to daclatasvir and this resistance was related to NS5A and not NS5B. The manuscript has many places that need rephrasing or improvement to read better. In addition, the references need to be updated as the authors did not include several important and recent papers about the topic.

More detailed comments will be attached below.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reponse_Plos.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249770.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Feb 2021

Reviewers’ comments Author’s replies

The manuscript requires editing by a native English speaker and/or professional editing service. The authors made the required English editing to the manuscript.

How was HCV RNA quantified? What was the lower limit of detection for the assay?

The HCV-RNA was amplified on Stratagene Mx3000P system using Artus HCV QS-RGQ-PCR Kit reagents. Amplification followed by simultaneous detection was carried out using RT-PCR, with TaqMan assay for a particular region of the HCV genome. the lower limit of detection for the assay is 30 IU/ml.

Only 18 of the 35 patient samples could be amplified by PCR suggesting very low sample quality. Samples storage conditions should be stated explicitly.

Approximately, 3 ml of blood were collected from each patient, the samples were shipped cooled (4°C) within 6 hours. centrifuged at 1500 rpm, sera were separated then distributed in aliquots, stored at -20°C. Then after RNA extraction the eluted RNA was stored at -80°C until further use. The sensitivity of the assay can be reduced as the samples stored for a longer period of time.

The assay may be subjected to many issues such as difficulty to amplify NS5B fragments, low viral load and the need to extremely trained professionals. These issues were discussed in the following references:

• Abdel-Hamid M, El-Daly M, Molnegren V, El-Kafrawy S, Abdel-Latif S, Esmat G, et al. Genetic diversity in hepatitis C virus in Egypt and possible association with hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of general virology. 2007;88(5):1526-31.

• Li Z, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Shao X, Luo Q, Cai Q, et al. Naturally occurring drug resistance associated variants to hepatitis C virus direct-acting antiviral agents in treatment-naive HCV genotype 1b-infected patients in China. Medicine. 2017;96(19).

• Warkad SD, Nimse SB, Song K-S, Kim T. HCV detection, discrimination, and genotyping technologies. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3423.

Were the samples that were PCR negative then extracted again and the PCR tried a second time?

Yes, the samples that were PCR negative extracted again using The MagMAX Viral RNA Isolation Kit For viral nucleic acid isolation which used to deliver yields of high quality RNA and DNA with little sample-to-sample variation as 35–75% of the input RNA should be recovered. The MagMAX™ magnetic bead technology useful for concentrating RNA from dilute samples. Then, the PCR tried a second time but gave no bands.

The authors have amplified only a small portion (~400 bases) of the entire NS5B region, representing a significant study limitation.

Because Sofosbuvir (SOF) is the predominant available NS5B polymerase inhibitor Nucleoside/nucleotide inhibitors (NI)] in Egypt, we mainly investigated the positions which are related to resistance associated variants (RAVs) to sofosbuvir and other positions such as 368, 411, 414, 448, 553, 554 and 556 which are related to resistance to another NS5B polymerase inhibitor, Dasabuvir [non-nucleoside inhibitor] NNI)], not fully covered in this study. As, NNIs delivered as a monotherapy came with a limited success, with a low to average antiviral activity, a low resistance barrier, and a minimal range of genotypic activity (active only against subtypes 1b and 1a).

Fadl, N, Salem, TZ. Hepatitis C genotype 4: A report on resistance‐associated substitutions in NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes. Rev Med Virol. 2020; 30:e2120

“normal” and “abnormal” levels for ALT and other clinical variables should be explicitly defined. Normal and abnormal levels for all clinical variables defined in the manuscript.

Are the authors comparing their sequences to a single NS5B consensus to identify mutations? If so, this approach has major limitations. The consensus may change with more or fewer sequences to generate the consensus, and minor – but important – mutations may be missed altogether. It is better to compare the query sequence to a set of HCV references (rather than to one) and then define a mutation as greater than X percentage of samples.

In order to undergo alignment step, HCV GT-4a reference strain with accession number DQ988074, HCV GT-4l reference strain FJ839870, HCV GT-4o reference strain FJ462440, HCV GT-3a reference strain D17763 and HCV GT-1g reference strain AM910652 from NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) was chosen to be aligned with the sequenced samples.

As a result, for the alignment, we noticed the presence of the mutations or the substitutions listed in our study in the tested samples and their absence in the reference strains. So, further investigations are needed to prove their relation to resistance.

A phylogenetic tree must be included to show the relationship amongst the sequences isolates.

The authors added the phylogenetic tree to the manuscript.

The small number of the analyzed samples, especially the non-responders.

.

Most of HCV Egyptian patients received the treatment at private clinics and pharmacies outside the viral hepatitis management center so hardly to reach to be included in our study. Additionally, the number of non-responder cases are very low due to the high rate of virological success of SOF-based regimens.

lack of comparison with other cohort of patients who achieved an early viral response.

There is some difficulty to follow up the patients after they end their treatment. We already tried to follow up our cases responsiveness to the treatment but failed. In Egypt, the routine follow-up depends mainly on performing RT-PCR to detect the viral load every 6 months, Then every year. So, patients can perform this test in private laboratories not the center which is considered one of the limitations of this study.

the use of multiple DAAs but analyzing one target gene. Although daclatasvir targets NS5A, nothing was done on this gene as patients may be resistant to daclatasvir and this resistance was related to NS5A and not NS5B.

.

Because sequencing step has high cost and this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

The manuscript has many places that need rephrasing or improvement to read better The authors made the required rephrasing to the manuscript.

In addition, the references need to be updated as the authors did not include several important and recent papers about the topic. The authors made the required updates to the references.

In the paragraph started with “Ribavirin-associated resistance mutations at positions D244N, Q309R, and A333E of NS5B were analyzed.” I am not sure why the authors compare their mutations with non-DAAs drugs and ignore comparing them with other DAAs drugs. Either they include the most related drugs or remove this paragraph altogether.

Ribavirin is included in HCV treatment protocol in Egypt. RBV is a nucleotide analogue that can be incorporated in the RNA-dependent polymerase, although the precise mechanism of action on viral replication remains elusive.

Raj, V. S., Hundie, G. B., Schürch, A. C., Smits, S. L., Pas, S. D., Le Pogam, S., ... & Haagmans, B. L. (2017). Identification of HCV resistant variants against direct acting antivirals in plasma and liver of treatment naïve patients. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-10.

Petronella Gededzha, M., Mphahlele, M. J., Blackard, J. T., & Gloria Selabe, S. (2017). Prevalence of NS5B resistance mutations in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment naïve South Africans. Hepatitis Monthly, 17(6).‏

Also, in Table 1, non-responders showed low viral load in comparison to naïve patients. This has to be addressed and reasonable explanation has to be made.

As the virus was under the stress of the antiviral therapy which results in the decrease in the replication of the virus and low viral load while naïve treatment patients are not subjected to the antiviral therapy stress. In addition, many patients under the antiviral therapy showed inaccurate low viral load or false negativity when testing plasma for HCV RNA due to the presence of HCV distributed in hepatic tissues and in extrahepatic tissues such as pancreas, kidney, brain, lymphoid tissues or elsewhere. So, Direct testing of

these tissues in individuals who test negatively for

HCV RNA in blood will be required to confirm or refute

that these other tissue sites serve as potential reservoirs

of persistent HCV infection and as a source of

viral relapse.

- Gurakar A, Fagiuoli S, Faruki H, De Maria N, Balkan M, Van Thiel DH, Friedlander L. Utility of hepatitis C virus RNA determinations in hepatic tissue as an end point for interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1995 Oct;22(4 Pt 1):1109-12. doi: 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90616-9. PMID: 7557858.

Change all treatment naïve to “treatment-naïve” The authors change all treatment naïve to “treatment-naïve” in the manuscript

Title

- For “Distribution of naturally occurring NS5B resistant associated substitutions among treatment- naïve HCV Egyptian patients and non-responders”

The title is not accurate as the authors should not consider the non-responders data as it came out from only one patient. We suggested this title

Distribution of naturally NS5B resistant associated substitutions between Egyptian HCV in Minia, Egypt

Abstract

- Authors mentioned “Results: NS5B amino acid sequence analysis showed the presence of several novel NS5B mutations (more than 40 substitution mutations) that have not been previously reported to be associated with a resistant phenotype.”

Without comparing with another cohort with EVR, these mutations may be not related to resistance. We compare our results with 5 standard strains sequences. we noticed the presence of the substitutions that were listed in our study in the tested samples and their absence in the reference strains and we did not find these substitutions in any of the research that were carried out in our area. So, further investigations are needed to prove their relation to resistance.

- In Table 4, it is not clear why the authors arrange ID numbers or the mutations this way. Neither IDs, number of mutations, or location of the mutations are in order. I recommend to order the table according to the no. of substitutions as well as the locations of the mutations. Each column should include one location and if at that position different mutations exist, it should be market with asterisk. Example, first column should be only for position 231 with asterisk for A231G* and moving 244 to different column in order. All changes were done

Note: the alignment for the substitutions were put in separate columns but the table became too large. So, we add it in the manuscript as an image. The actual excel form of the table will be attached as supplementary file.

All typing errors written in the response file of the reviewer were corrected in the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response (1) (1).docx

Decision Letter 1

Philippe Gallay

8 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-39695R1

Distribution of naturally occurring NS5B resistant associated substitutions among treatment naïve HCV Egyptian patients and non-responders

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rehab Mahmoud Abd El-Baky,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The authors have addressed a majority of the previous issues. However, their explanation/comments need to be fully integrated in the text starting with the title "....treatment-naive".

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 22 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Philippe Gallay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The authors addressed a majority of the issues and provided reasonable answers to address the comments of the reviewers. However, all their explanation need to be integrated in the revised manuscript starting with the title: "....treatment-naive.....".

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Philippe Gallay

25 Mar 2021

Distribution of Naturally -Occurring NS5B Resistance-Associated Substitutions In Egyptian Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

PONE-D-20-39695R2

Dear Dr. Rehab Mahmoud Abd El-Baky,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Philippe Gallay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Philippe Gallay

6 Apr 2021

PONE-D-20-39695R2

Distribution of Naturally -Occurring NS5B Resistance-Associated Substitutions In Egyptian Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Dear Dr. Abd El-Baky:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Philippe Gallay

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reponse_Plos.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response (1) (1).docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviwers (1).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES