Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2021 Mar 13;11(4):jkab047. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab047

A C. elegans genome-wide RNAi screen for altered levamisole sensitivity identifies genes required for muscle function

Timothy Chaya 1,, Shrey Patel 2,✉,#, Erin M Smith 2,#, Andy Lam 2, Elaine N Miller 2,, Michael Clupper 2, Kirsten Kervin 2,, Jessica E Tanis 1,2,
Editor: A J M Walhout
PMCID: PMC8049432  PMID: 33713125

Abstract

At the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), postsynaptic ionotropic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) transduce a chemical signal released from a cholinergic motor neuron into an electrical signal to induce muscle contraction. To identify regulators of postsynaptic function, we conducted a genome-wide RNAi screen for genes required for proper response to levamisole, a pharmacological agonist of ionotropic L-AChRs at the Caenorhabditis elegans NMJ. A total of 117 gene knockdowns were found to cause levamisole hypersensitivity, while 18 resulted in levamisole resistance. Our screen identified conserved genes important for muscle function including some that are mutated in congenital myasthenic syndrome, congenital muscular dystrophy, congenital myopathy, myotonic dystrophy, and mitochondrial myopathy. Of the genes found in the screen, we further investigated those predicted to play a role in endocytosis of cell surface receptors. Loss of the Epsin homolog epn-1 caused levamisole hypersensitivity and had opposing effects on the levels of postsynaptic L-AChRs and GABAA receptors, resulting in increased and decreased abundance, respectively. We also examined other genes that resulted in a levamisole-hypersensitive phenotype when knocked down including gas-1, which functions in Complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Consistent with altered ATP synthesis impacting levamisole response, treatment of wild-type animals with levamisole resulted in L-AChR–dependent depletion of ATP levels. These results suggest that the paralytic effects of levamisole ultimately lead to metabolic exhaustion.

Keywords: C. elegans, levamisole, acetylcholine, GABA, endocytosis, epn-1, gas-1, ATP

Introduction

Acetylcholine (ACh), released from motor neurons, activates postsynaptic ionotropic ACh receptors (AChRs), resulting in an electrical signal that leads to muscle contraction. Disruption of cholinergic signaling at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is the underlying cause of severe muscle weakness observed in individuals with congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and the autoimmune syndrome Myasthenia gravis (Engel et al. 2015). Clinical features of some congenital myopathies and muscular dystrophies resemble CMS despite different genetic causes and muscle histopathology (Mahjneh et al. 2013; Rodríguez Cruz et al. 2014; Montagnese et al. 2017). This suggests that characterizing mechanisms, which regulate postsynaptic cholinergic signaling, could provide an insight into multiple neuromuscular disorders.

C. elegans body wall muscles are functionally comparable to vertebrate skeletal muscles and provide an excellent model for the study of neuromuscular transmission (Gieseler 2017). There are two classes of ionotropic AChRs at the C. elegans NMJ that have distinct pharmacological profiles. L-AChRs are heteromeric AChRs that are sensitive to the nematode-specific AChR agonist levamisole, while N-AChRs are homomeric AChRs that are activated by nicotine, but insensitive to levamisole (Richmond and Jorgensen 1999; Touroutine et al. 2005). Wild-type animals exposed to levamisole undergo time-dependent paralysis (Lewis et al. 1980). Altered sensitivity to levamisole-induced paralysis can be indicative of defects in postsynaptic cholinergic signaling. A forward genetic screen for mutants with strong levamisole resistance identified mutations in 12 different genes encoding subunits of the L-AChR as well as proteins required for L-AChR trafficking, clustering, and muscle contraction (Lewis et al. 1980; Gally et al. 2004; Eimer et al. 2007; Gendrel et al. 2009). Levamisole-resistant mutants have also been isolated in a forward genetic screen for animals that initially exhibit paralysis in response to levamisole, but subsequently adapt and regain motility (Rapti et al. 2011; Boulin et al. 2012; Richard et al. 2013; D’Alessandro et al. 2018). However, mutants hypersensitive to levamisole, as well as levamisole-resistant mutants which also have a lethal or sterile phenotype, could not be isolated in these genetic screens. For example, loss of function mutations in fer-1, the C. elegans homolog of Dysferlin which is mutated in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy 2B, result in weak levamisole resistance, but also sterility (Achanzar and Ward 1997; Krajacic et al. 2013). Since fer-1 was not identified in the forward genetic screens for levamisole resistance, this suggests that performing a different type of genetic screen may uncover new genes important for muscle function.

Feeding C. elegans bacteria that make double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) produce an RNA interference (RNAi) signal that spreads throughout the animal, causing knockdown of corresponding gene function (Timmons et al. 2001). Since animals treated with dsRNA do not have to be propagated and the dsRNA can be delivered post-embryonically, genome-wide RNAi screens can identify genes that are otherwise essential for viability. Prior RNAi screens that assessed approximately 10% of the genome for resistance and hypersensitivity to the acetylcholine esterase inhibitor aldicarb identified genes important for cholinergic neurotransmission and GABAergic signaling, respectively (Sieburth et al. 2005; Vashlishan et al. 2008). Here, we performed a systematic genome-wide RNAi screen for gene knockdowns that cause hypersensitivity or resistance to levamisole to identify novel regulators of postsynaptic signaling. We identified 135 gene knockdowns that resulted in altered levamisole response. Only 7% of the genes that we discovered had a previously annotated levamisole phenotype, suggesting that our screen identified new regulators of postsynaptic function.

Materials and Methods

Nematode culture

C. elegans were maintained on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) plates with OP50 E. coli using standard techniques (Brenner 1974). The wild-type strain was Bristol N2. Other strains used in this study were as follows: CB1072 unc-29(e1072) I, ZZ17 lev-10(x17) I, CB407 unc-49(e407) III, GR1373 eri-1(mg366) IV, CW152 gas-1(fc21) X, GS2526 arIS37 I; mca-3(ar492) dpy-20(e1282) IV, UDE5 unc-63(kr98-YFP) I; eri-1(mg366) IV, UDE23 krSi2(unc-49::tagRFP) III; eri-1(mg366) IV. All C. elegans strains were cultured at 20 °C except those with eri-1(mg366), which were maintained at 15 °C.

Levamisole time course swim assay

24 well-NGM plates or RNAi plates (NGM plus 1 mM IPTG and 25 µg/µL carbenicillin) with 40 µL of bacterial food source per well were prepared. In each plate, there were at least three independent wells per genotype (Figures 1A, 4F) or RNAi clone (Figures 2A, B and Figure 4 A-E); researchers who performed the assay were blinded. About twenty-first larval stage (L1) animals synchronized by bleaching were pipetted into each well. After three days, approximately 1 mL of 0.4 mM levamisole (Sigma) in M9 buffer was added to wells at intervals. The number of moving worms per well was counted every 5 minutes until all worms stopped moving or 60 minutes passed; a worm was classified as moving as long it completed at least one body bend. The total number of worms per well was recorded at the end of the assay. Data from the wells containing the same RNAi clone were pooled and used to generate Kaplan-Meier survival plots in Graph Pad Prism; log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were used to determine significance. At least three independent assays were conducted on different days for each genotype or RNAi clone; representative experiments are shown in the figures. For time course assays with gene knockdowns, at least three wells of empty vector control were present in every 24 well plate, as there can be variability in levamisole stock, plates animals are grown on, and scoring done by different individuals carrying out the assay.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

RNAi screen for altered sensitivity to levamisole

(A) Time-dependent paralysis of wild-type (black), unc-29 (red), lev-10 (tan), and unc-49 (blue) animals in a levamisole swim assay. Loss of unc-29 (red) and lev-10 (tan) caused resistance; loss of unc-49 (blue) resulted in hypersensitivity. n≥30 per genotype in this representative experiment; p <0.0001 for all mutants compared to the wild-type control. (B) Workflow for the RNAi screen. eri-1 L1s were fed bacteria expressing dsRNA in 24 well plates. After three days, 0.4 mM levamisole in M9 was added to each well and animals were scored for hypersensitivity after 15 minutes and resistance after 40 minutes. (C-D) After the primary screen was performed in duplicate, “hits” were screened again in quadruplicate. Gene knockdowns were considered positive if altered levamisole sensitivity was observed four or more times (p < 0.05).

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Loss of EPN-1 increases the abundance of L-AChRs

(A) mca-3 knockdown (red) and the mca-3(ar492) mutation (tan) both cause resistance to levamisole induced paralysis; p < 0.0001, n ≥ 50. (B) Knockdown of epn-1 (blue) results in hypersensitivity to levamisole; p < 0.0001, n ≥ 68 (C, D) Representative images of YFP-tagged UNC-63 L-AChRs on the ventral (C) and dorsal (D) sides of animals exposed to empty vector (EV, top), epn-1 (middle), and mca-3 (bottom) RNAi; anterior to the left, scale bar = 10 µm. (E-J) Quantitation of the density (E, H), volume (F, I), and abundance (G, J) of UNC-63::YFP clusters at the NMJ in EV, epn-1, and mca-3 knockdown animals; ventral (E-G) and dorsal (H-J) measurements are indicated. Data are shown in box plots (min to max), n ≥ 16, *** p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Levamisole exposure reduces cellular ATP

(A-E) A functional class with genes required for ATP synthesis was identified in the RNAi screen for altered sensitivity to levamisole. Knockdown of gas-1 (red), cox-7c (blue), and F53F4.10 (tan) in (A), cchl-1 (red), nduf-9 (blue), and cox-4 (tan) in (B), nuo-3 (red), C33A12.1 (blue), and cyc-2.1 (tan) in (C), yars-2 (red), and hpo-18 (blue) in (D), and asg-1 (red), F42G8.10 (blue), and D2030.4 (tan) in (E) causes hypersensitivity to levamisole compared to empty vector (EV, black) in time course assays; p < 0.001 for all knockdowns. (F) Like the gas-1 knockdown in (A), gas-1(fc21) (red) exhibits hypersensitivity to levamisole-induced paralysis compared to wild-type (black); p < 0.001. (G, H) 60 minutes of exposure to 0.4 mM levamisole (lev) causes a significant decrease in ATP (* p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test) in wild-type (G), but not unc-29 L-AChR mutants (H); data are the mean ± SE, each individual measurement is shown.

Levamisole sensitivity RNAi screen

The RNAi feeding screen was carried out in 24 well format as described (Kamath et al. 2003). Around 30 L1 eri-1(mg366) animals were deposited in each well. After three days of RNAi exposure at 20 °C, wells were checked for the presence of adult worms and lack of contamination. Approximately 1 mL of 0.4 mM levamisole (Sigma) in M9 buffer was added and the number of moving animals in each well was recorded at 15 and 40 minutes to identify hypersensitivity and resistance, respectively. Wells with at least 50% of the animals paralyzed at 15 minutes were marked as hypersensitive, while wells with at least 30% of the animals moving at 40 minutes were scored as resistant. Animals grown on the HT115 empty vector control were scored every day of screening. The entire genome-wide screen was performed in duplicate. Knockdowns that caused altered levamisole response twice, or once for genes with known muscle expression, were retested in quadruplicate. For the final gene list (Supplemental Table 1), the RNAi clones caused a levamisole phenotype in at least 4/6 trials, did not induce paralysis in a 60-minute swim test in water, produced a levamisole phenotype in a single time course assay, and were sequence verified.

Fluorescence microscopy and image analysis

UDE5 unc-63(kr98-YFP); eri-1(mg366) animals to visualize L-AChRs, and UDE23 krSi2(unc-49::tagRFP); eri-1(mg366) animals to visualize GABAA receptors (GABAARs), were grown on empty vector, epn-1 and mca-3 RNAi plates. Late fourth-larval stage (L4) animals were picked onto new corresponding RNAi plates, cultured for 24 hours at 20°C to produce staged adults, and immobilized with 50 mM sodium azide on 3% agar pads 10 minutes prior to imaging. Z-stack images of UNC-63::YFP receptors mid-way between the second pharyngeal bulb and the vulva were obtained with a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope using a 40X water objective and master gain of 870. UNC-49::tagRFP images were collected with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using a 40X water objective and master gain of 981. Z-stack images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional Software with signal-to-noise ratio set to 5 and quality threshold of 0.05. Images with no indication of movement were analyzed with Volocity software with a minimum object size of 1 µm3. The numbers of puncta per 50 µm segment, volume (µm3) of each punctum, and mean intensity (arbitrary units) of each punctum were recorded. A non-parametric one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (GraphPad Prism) was used to test for significance.

ATP quantitation

ATP quantification assays were performed with the ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II (Roche Diagnostics) as described (Palikaras and Tavernarakis 2016) with some modifications. Synchronized populations of unc-29(e1072) and wild-type animals, ∼1000 per 10 cm NGM plate, were exposed to the following conditions: 60 minutes no treatment, 60 minutes M9, or 60 minutes 0.4 mM levamisole in M9. Animals were washed 3x with M9 solution and 20 µL of worms were transferred to microcentrifuge tubes. 180 µL of boiling Tris-EDTA buffer (100 mM Tris, 4 mM EDTA pH 7.75) was added and samples were incubated at 100 °C for 2 minutes, sonicated for 4 minutes (Model 150 V/T Ultrasonic Homogenizer), and then centrifuged at 14,000 RPM for 10 minutes at 4 °C. 30 µL of the supernatant was added to 270 µL Tris-EDTA buffer to make 1:10 dilutions for triplicate technical replicates. ATP content was determined following the Roche ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II protocol using a Glomax 96 Microplate Luminometer. ATP levels were normalized to total protein content (Pierce BCA protein assay kit). Six biological replicates were performed; statistical significance was determined using a non-parametric one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test.

Results and Discussion

An RNAi screen for altered sensitivity to levamisole

The body wall muscles receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs from cholinergic and GABAergic motor neurons, respectively. Altered time to levamisole-induced paralysis can be used to identify genes that impact the balance of postsynaptic excitatory and inhibitory signaling. While levamisole-resistant mutants have been isolated, mutations in genes required for both viability and levamisole response could not be identified in the forward genetic screens, and there has never been a genetic screen for levamisole hypersensitivity (Lewis et al. 1980; Rapti et al. 2011; Boulin et al. 2012; Richard et al. 2013; D’Alessandro et al. 2018). We reasoned that a genome-wide RNAi screen for gene knockdowns that cause hypersensitivity or resistance to levamisole would identify new regulators of postsynaptic function.

Traditionally, resistance or hypersensitivity to levamisole has been determined using a plate-based assay, which requires prodding animals to assess paralysis. To enable high-throughput screening, we developed a liquid levamisole swim assay performed on animals grown in 24 well plates. Compared to plate-based experiments, the liquid levamisole assay required a lower concentration of levamisole, 0.4 mM, to induce complete paralysis of wild-type animals within 45 minutes (Figure 1A). Further, the vigorous swimming of the animals in liquid allowed us to assess paralysis without physically prodding the animals. We tested mutants with known levamisole phenotypes in our new assay and found that mutations in unc-29, which encodes an essential L-AChR subunit and lev-10, which is important for L-AChR clustering, caused resistance (Figure 1A) (Lewis et al. 1980; Gally et al. 2004). The swim assay also detected hypersensitivity to levamisole in the unc-49 GABAAR mutant, which has reduced inhibitory signaling (Figure 1A) (Richmond and Jorgensen 1999; Bamber et al. 2005). These results demonstrate that levamisole phenotypes can be observed using a swim-based levamisole assay and since this assay is less labor intensive, it is ideal for a genetic screen.

We performed liquid levamisole swim assays on animals grown on RNAi clones in 24-well plates and scored the number of animals moving at two time points to identify hypersensitivity and resistance (Figure 1B). In the primary screen, we tested animals fed clones from the C. elegans RNAi library generated by the Ahringer group (Kamath et al. 2003), representing ∼86% of the genome, in duplicate. Gene knockdowns that caused altered levamisole response twice, or once for genes with known muscle expression, were defined as “hits” and retested in quadruplicate. We identified 142 RNAi clones that caused hypersensitivity and 24 RNAi clones that produced resistance in at least four out of six trials and did not induce paralysis during a 60-minute swim test, which ensured that these animals were capable of movement for the entire assay time period (Figure 1C, D). 93% of the gene knockdowns that caused levamisole hypersensitivity in the screen paralyzed significantly faster than the control in time course experiments; 75% of the gene knockdowns that were found to elicit resistance in the screen were validated with time course assays. In total, we sequence-verified 135 of the RNAi clones that caused altered levamisole sensitivity in time course assays (Supplemental Table 1). 89% have human homologs, and of those with a defined expression pattern, 74% are muscle expressed. This indicates that we identified highly conserved genes with postsynaptic expression at the NMJ.

Although loss of genes identified in our screen produced the same levamisole phenotype when scored with the swim-based and plate-based assays (Figure 1A, Supplemental Figure 1), just 7% of the genes that we discovered were previously associated with altered levamisole sensitivity. Of the RNAi clones for nine of the genes identified in the forward genetic screen for strong levamisole resistance, we identified only a third of these, unc-63, lev-10, and unc-22, in our screen. While many other genes that impact levamisole sensitivity were also not identified in our screen, there are multiple possible reasons for this. First, not all of the RNAi clones in the library cause efficient knockdown (Supplemental Figure 2). Second, since RNAi exposure commenced at the first larval stage, there may have been insufficient knock down of some genes to generate an altered levamisole response by the time the animals were assayed. Third, some of the RNAi clones caused severe developmental defects that prevented us from screening the levamisole sensitivity of those animals. Fourth, we used a different levamisole assay than the forward genetic screens and thus we were unable to identify animals that initially exhibit paralysis in response to levamisole, but subsequently adapt and regain motility (Rapti et al. 2011; Boulin et al. 2012; Richard et al. 2013; D’Alessandro et al. 2018). Finally, contamination and lack of animals in a limited number of wells prevented us from screening some library clones in duplicate. Despite these limitations, our screen identified 126 new genes that exhibit a levamisole phenotype when knocked down.

Our reverse genetic screen provided unique advantages that enabled us to discover these new genes required for proper levamisole response. We were able to detect both hypersensitive and resistant phenotypes with our two-time point screen and by initiating gene knockdown after embryogenesis was complete, we were able to identify many genes otherwise essential for viability. Notably, 50% of the genes that we discovered have an annotated sterile or lethal phenotype, justifying the need for a reverse genetic screen to identify additional factors that impact levamisole response.

Here, we have performed an initial characterization of two different classes of genes identified in our screen.

C. elegans Epsin regulates postsynaptic receptor abundance

During endocytosis, the plasma membrane and associated proteins are pulled toward the cytosol, membrane scission occurs, and the endocytic vesicle is internalized. Cargoes are then either targeted for degradation or recruited back to the plasma membrane via recycling endosomes to modulate synaptic strength (Park et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2008). Maintenance of the proper abundance of postsynaptic receptors is achieved by balancing the delivery of new receptors to the plasma membrane with the endocytic removal of existing receptors. Genes required for L-AChR assembly, trafficking to the cell surface, and clustering on the body wall muscles, but not internalization have been previously identified (Gally et al. 2004; Eimer et al. 2007; Gendrel et al. 2009; Rapti et al. 2011; Richard et al. 2013; D’Alessandro et al. 2018). We discovered two genes in our screen, mca-3 and epn-1, which have previously described roles in endocytosis. MCA-3, a plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA), functions in clathrin-mediated endocytosis in C. elegans coelomocytes by recruiting endocytic machinery to the plasma membrane (Bednarek et al. 2007). Further, in hippocampal neurons, inhibition of PMCA2 triggers the loss of ionotropic α7-nAChRs (Gómez-Varela et al. 2012). Knockdown of mca-3 caused levamisole resistance in time course assays (Figure 2A). Although null mutations in mca-3 cause lethality, we were able to validate our results with a partial loss of function mutation and found that this generated significant levamisole resistance, though a weaker phenotype than observed with mca-3 knockdown (Figure 2A). EPN-1 is a homolog of mammalian Epsin, which functions as an adaptor to recruit specific cargoes and induce membrane curvature that results in endocytic vesicle formation (Chen et al. 1998; Wendland et al. 1999; Ford et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2006). Knockdown of epn-1 resulted in levamisole hypersensitivity, though we could not confirm this result with an epn-1 mutant, as all known mutants are non-viable (Figure 2B). Both mca-3 and epn-1 are expressed in the body wall muscles where they could play a role in regulating the abundance of postsynaptic receptors (Bednarek et al. 2007; Shen et al. 2013).

To determine if loss of mca-3 or epn-1 had an impact on L-AChR abundance, we used a knock-in strain that expresses YFP-tagged UNC-63, an essential subunit of the L-AChR, from its genomic locus (Gendrel et al. 2009) and analyzed the distribution of UNC-63::YFP puncta in animals grown on empty vector, mca-3, and epn-1 RNAi clones. We quantitated the number of puncta per 50 µm to define the quantity of postsynaptic specializations, the average volume of each puncta to determine the size of these specializations, and the average intensity to measure the relative number of receptors. Based on these parameters, loss of mca-3 did not affect L-AChR abundance or localization (Figure 2C-J). Therefore, the levamisole-resistant phenotype associated with loss of mca-3 cannot be explained by a reduced number of L-AChRs. However, loss of epn-1 caused a significant increase in UNC-63::YFP intensity, without altering puncta number or size, on both the dorsal and ventral sides of the animals (Figure 2C-J). This increase in the number of L-AChRs at or near the cell surface is consistent with the levamisole-hypersensitive phenotype observed in epn-1 knockdown animals and could be the result of either different L-AChR protein levels or altered insertion into the membrane. Our results suggest that EPN-1 may play a role in the endocytosis of L-AChRs from the plasma membrane without affecting the number or size of postsynaptic specializations.

Defects in GABA signaling can disrupt the excitatory-inhibitory balance in the body wall muscles, resulting in altered levamisole response (Vashlishan et al. 2008; Krajacic et al. 2013; Kowalski et al. 2014). We reasoned that an increase in postsynaptic UNC-49 GABAARs and thus inhibitory signaling could lead to a levamisole-resistant phenotype such as that observed with loss of mca-3. In fact, cup-5, a mutant identified along with mca-3 (cup-7) in a forward genetic screen for coelomocyte uptake defective mutants regulates plasma membrane levels of GABAARs (Fares and Greenwald 2001; Davis et al. 2010). Using a transgenic strain that expresses RFP-tagged UNC-49 at single copy (Pinan-Lucarré et al. 2014), we analyzed the distribution of postsynaptic UNC-49::tagRFP receptor puncta in animals grown on empty vector, mca-3, and epn-1 RNAi clones. We found that, for the most part, loss of mca-3 did not alter GABAAR abundance or localization, though a small, yet significant decrease in the average volume of GABAAR puncta was observed on the dorsal side (Figure 3A-H). Surprisingly, analysis of GABAARs in the epn-1 knockdown showed a significant decrease in UNC-49::tagRFP intensity compared to the control, with no effect on the number or size of the puncta (Figure 3A-H). These results suggest that EPN-1 regulates the abundance of both L-AChRs and GABAARs at the NMJ.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Loss of EPN-1 decreases postsynaptic GABAAR abundance

(A, B) Representative images of RFP-tagged UNC-49 GABAARs on the ventral (A) and dorsal (B) sides of animals exposed to empty vector (EV, top), epn-1 (middle), and mca-3 (bottom) RNAi; anterior to the left, scale bar = 10 µm. (C-H) Quantitation of UNC-49::tagRFP density (C, F), volume (D, G), and abundance (E, H) on the body wall muscles of EV, epn-1, and mca-3 knockdown animals; ventral (C-E) and dorsal (F-H) measurements are indicated. Data are shown in box plots (min to max), n ≥ 17, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test.

Both the increase in L-AChRs and decrease in GABAARs on the body wall muscles likely contribute to the levamisole-hypersensitive phenotype observed in epn-1 knockdown animals. However, the mechanism by which EPN-1 has opposing effects on the abundance of two different types of postsynaptic receptors, impacting both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, is not known. EPN-1 has been shown to be expressed in multiple cell types including body wall muscles and neurons (Shen et al. 2013). As loss of epn-1 increases L-AChR abundance, EPN-1 may act directly in the body wall muscles to regulate the endocytosis of these receptors. How EPN-1 controls the levels of GABAARs is likely less straightforward. Mutants with GABA transmission defects can display levamisole hypersensitivity (Vashlishan et al. 2008; Kowalski et al. 2014). Further, the C. elegans Punctin MADD-4B, secreted by GABAergic neurons, is required for appropriate recruitment of GABAARs to the NMJ (Pinan-Lucarré et al. 2014; Tu et al. 2015). Thus, it is possible that EPN-1 plays an endocytic role in GABAergic neurons, leading to a compensatory effect on postsynaptic GABAARs. Future studies will define the EPN-1 site of action, subcellular distribution, and effect on other synaptic markers as well as whether postsynaptic receptor abundance is regulated by clathrin-mediated or clathrin-independent endocytosis.

Disruption of cellular ATP levels alters levamisole sensitivity

Although levamisole has been used for decades to identify mutants with defects in postsynaptic signaling and immobilize animals for microscopy, the mechanism by which treatment with this pharmacological agent results in paralysis and death has not been fully defined. L-AChR activation leads to opening of the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel EGL-19, muscle depolarization, and, ultimately, Ca2+ release from intracellular stores through the ryanodine receptor UNC-68 (Liu et al. 2011). Ca2+ binds to troponin, causing a shift in the position of tropomyosin and increasing the probability that myosin will bind the thin filament to produce force to generate muscle contraction. The sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) works in concert with plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPases (PMCAs) and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers to lower cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels, which terminates contraction (Clapham 2007; Martin and Richmond 2018). If there is a decline in cellular ATP levels, this prevents Ca2+ from being pumped out of the cytoplasm, causing the muscles to remain contracted until Ca2+-dependent proteases induce muscle degeneration and finally relaxation in death (Galimov et al. 2018). It has been hypothesized that levamisole-induced paralysis and death could be the result of cellular metabolic catastrophe, a condition in which ATP depletion prevents muscle function (Lewis et al. 1980). We discovered that knockdown of 14 genes predicted to play a role in ATP synthesis, gas-1, cox-7c, cchl-1, nduf-9, cox-4, nuo-3, C33A12.1, cyc-2.1, yars-2, hpo-18, asg-1, F53F4.10, F42G8.10, and D2030.4, caused levamisole hypersensitivity both in our genetic screen and time course assays (Figure 4A-E). While most of these genes are essential for viability (Supplemental Table 1), we were able to validate the levamisole-hypersensitivity phenotype with a gas-1 loss of function mutant, which has defects in Complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Figure 4F) (Kayser et al. 2001). These results suggest that reduced ATP synthesis increases sensitivity to levamisole, accelerating death.

To determine if levamisole exposure leads to metabolic exhaustion, we quantitated ATP levels in animals that were washed off plates, swimming in M9 buffer for 60 minutes, or swimming in 0.4 mM levamisole for 60 minutes. While swimming in buffer had no effect on measured ATP, addition of levamisole significantly decreased ATP levels (Figure 4G). This was due to signaling through L-AChRs since levamisole did not have an impact on ATP levels in the unc-29 L-AChR mutant (Figure 4H). This shows that levamisole exposure decreases ATP in cells that express L-AChRs and provides evidence for levamisole-induced metabolic catastrophe.

It is possible that knockdown of some seemingly unrelated genes identified in our screen may result in hypersensitivity to levamisole due to reduced cellular ATP and future studies will test this hypothesis. Loss of pat-4 (Integrin Linked Kinase), tln-1 (Talin I), unc-73 (Trio), and unc-60 (Cofilin) causes fragmentation of the muscle mitochondrial network, while loss of prmt-1 (Protein Arginine Methyltransferase I) has been shown to reduce ATP synthesis (Etheridge et al. 2015; Sha et al. 2017). Further, we reason that mutants with reduced ATP usage would produce a resistant phenotype. SERCA and PMCA together utilize >30% of muscle produced ATP to pump Ca2+ out of the cytoplasm (Homsher 1987). Since release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores through ryanodine receptors dictates the amount of ATP used by Ca2+ ATPases, ATP usage can be attenuated by decreasing Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. This provides a possible explanation for the levamisole-resistant phenotype observed in the unc-68 ryanodine receptor mutant (Lewis et al. 1980). SERCAs translocate two Ca2+ ions into the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum lumen for each molecule of ATP hydrolyzed, while PMCAs translocate a single Ca2+ ion per ATP (Inesi and De Meis 1989; Hao et al. 1994). Thus, loss of the PMCA MCA-3 may reduce ATP usage, enabling the more efficient SERCA SCA-1 to continue to pump Ca2+ into the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum and leading to the levamisole resistance observed in the mca-3 mutant. Consequently, loss of genes that affect either ATP synthesis or usage could impact levamisole sensitivity.

Conclusion

Here, we conducted the first genome-wide reverse genetic screen for postsynaptic regulators. In summary, we identified 135 gene knockdowns that caused altered sensitivity to the L-AChR agonist levamisole, describing a levamisole phenotype for 93% of these genes for the first time. We discovered novel genes because this was the first genetic screen capable of detecting levamisole hypersensitivity and genes that impact both levamisole response and viability. One gene that caused levamisole hypersensitivity when knocked down and lethality when knocked out is epn-1. Our work shows that loss of epn-1 impacts postsynaptic function by having opposing effects on the abundance of postsynaptic L-AChRs and GABAARs. Notably, our screen also identified C. elegans homologs of genes mutated in congenital myasthenic syndrome (AChR), congenital muscular dystrophy (Mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase beta), congenital myopathy (Cofilin), myotonic dystrophy (ELAV-type RNA binding protein), and mitochondrial myopathy (NADH dehydrogenase) (Lu et al. 1999; Milne and Hodgkin 1999; Agrawal et al. 2007; Ockeloen et al. 2012; Carss et al. 2013; Engel et al. 2015; Schubert and Vilarinho 2020). This suggests that altered response to levamisole can be used broadly to discover and study genes that impact muscle function.

A functional class of genes known to impact ATP synthesis was also identified in our screen. This led us to discover that levamisole treatment decreased cellular ATP, which likely leads to metabolic exhaustion. Levamisole is commonly used by members of the C. elegans community to immobilize animals for imaging experiments. Thus, our results have broad significance, as understanding the consequences of levamisole exposure is important for researchers who use this as a chemical anesthetizing agent.

Acknowledgements

We thank J. L. Bessereau for providing unc-63(kr98-YFP) and krSi2(unc-49::tagRFP); other nematode strains used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We thank Todd Lamitina and Denis Touroutine for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

Data availability

All data and methods required to confirm the conclusions of this work are within the article, figures, and tables. Table S1 is a list of all genes identified in the RNAi screen that were confirmed by time course assays and sequencing. Supplemental material, including Table S1, Figure S1, and Figure S2 is available at figshare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13698844.

Funding

This work was supported by an NIH-NIAMS grant F32 AR060128 and NIH-NIGMS IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) P20 GM103446 Core Center Access Award (to J.E.T.). Shared instrumentation grants funded acquisition of the LSM780 (S10 RR027273) and LSM880 (S10 OD016361) confocal microscopes and access was supported by the NIH-NIGMS (P20 GM103446), the NSF (IIA-1301765), and the State of Delaware.

Author Contributions

T.C. and J.T. conducted the screen. T.C., S.P., E.S., A.L., M.C., K.K., and J.T. performed time course assays. S.P. and E.M. carried out the confocal imaging. A.L. conducted the ATP quantitation. E.S., K.K., and J.T. carried out literature searches on identified genes. E.S. and J.T. created the figures. E.S., S.P., and J.T. wrote the manuscript. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Literature cited

  1. Achanzar WE, Ward S.. 1997. A nematode gene required for sperm vesicle fusion. J. Cell Sci. 110:1073–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal PB, Greenleaf RS, Tomczak KK, Lehtokari VL, Wallgren-Pettersson C, et al. 2007. Nemaline myopathy with minicores caused by mutation of the CFL2 gene encoding the skeletal muscle actin-binding protein, cofilin-2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80:162–167. 10.1086/510402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamber BA, Richmond JE, Otto JF, Jorgensen EM.. 2005. The composition of the GABA receptor at the Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction. Br. J. Pharmacol. 144:502–509. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednarek EM, Schaheen L, Gaubatz J, Jorgensen EM, Fares H.. 2007. The plasma membrane calcium ATPase MCA-3 is required for clathrin-mediated endocytosis in scavenger cells of Caenorhabditis elegans. Traffic. 8:543–553. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00547.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulin T, Rapti G, Briseño-Roa L, Stigloher C, Richmond JE, et al. 2012. Positive modulation of a Cys-loop acetylcholine receptor by an auxiliary transmembrane subunit. Nat Neurosci. 15:1374–1381. 10.1038/nn.3197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 77:71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carss KJ, Stevens E, Foley AR, Cirak S, Riemersma M, et al. 2013. Mutations in GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase b cause congenital and limb-girdle muscular dystrophies associated with hypoglycosylation of α-dystroglycan. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93:29–41. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen H, Fre S, Slepnev VI, Capua MR, Takei K, et al. 1998. Epsin is an EH-domain-binding protein implicated in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature. 394:793–797. 10.1038/29555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clapham DE. 2007. Calcium Signaling. Cell. 131:1047–1058. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. D'Alessandro M, Richard M, Stigloher C, Gache V, Boulin T, et al. 2018. CRELD1 is an evolutionarily-conserved maturational enhancer of ionotropic acetylcholine receptors. Elife. 7:e39649. 10.7554/eLife.39649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis KM, Sturt BL, Friedmann AJ, Richmond JE, Bessereau JL, et al. 2010. Regulated lysosomal trafficking as a mechanism for regulating GABAA receptor abundance at synapses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 44:307–317. 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eimer S, Gottschalk A, Hengartner M, Horvitz HR, Richmond J, et al. 2007. Regulation of nicotinic receptor trafficking by the transmembrane Golgi protein UNC-50. Embo J. 26:4313–4323. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Engel AG, Shen X-M, Selcen D, Sine SM.. 2015. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 14:420–434. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70201-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Etheridge T, Rahman M, Gaffney CJ, Shaw D, Shephard F, et al. 2015. The integrin-adhesome is required to maintain muscle structure, mitochondrial ATP production, and movement forces in Caenorhabditis elegans. FASEB J. 29:1235–1246. 10.1096/fj.14-259119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fares H, Greenwald I.. 2001. Genetic analysis of endocytosis in caenorhabditis elegans: Coelomocyte uptake defective mutants. Genetics. 159:133–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford MGJ, Mills IG, Peter BJ, Vallis Y, Praefcke GJK, et al. 2002. Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin. Nature. 419:361–366. 10.1038/nature01020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Galimov ER, Pryor RE, Poole SE, Benedetto A, Pincus Z, et al. 2018. Coupling of rigor mortis and intestinal necrosis during C. elegans organismal death. Cell Rep. 22:2730–2741. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gally C, Eimer S, Richmond JE, Bessereau JL.. 2004. A transmembrane protein required for acetylcholine receptor clustering in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 431:578–582. 10.1038/nature02893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gendrel M, Rapti G, Richmond JE, Bessereau JL.. 2009. A secreted complement-control-related protein ensures acetylcholine receptor clustering. Nature. 461:992–996. 10.1038/nature08430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gieseler K. 2017. Development, structure, and maintenance of C. elegans body wall muscle. WormBook. 1–59. 10.1895/wormbook.1.81.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gómez-Varela D, Schmidt M, Schoellerman J, Peters EC, Berg DK.. 2012. PMCA2 via PSD-95 controls calcium signaling by α7-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on aspiny interneurons. J. Neurosci. 32:6894–6905. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5972-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hao L, Rigaud JL, Inesi G.. 1994. Ca2+/H+ countertransport and electrogenicity in proteoliposomes containing erythrocyte plasma membrane Ca-ATPase and exogenous lipids. J. Biol. Chem. 269:14268–14275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Homsher E. 1987. Muscle enthalpy production and its relationship to actomyosin ATPase. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 49:673–690. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.49.1.673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Inesi G, De Meis L.. 1989. Regulation of steady state filling in sarcoplasmic reticulum. Roles of back-inhibition, leakage, and slippage of the calcium pump. J. Biol. Chem. 264:5929–5936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, et al. 2003. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 421:231–237. 10.1038/nature01278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kayser EB, Morgan PG, Hoppel CL, Sedensky MM.. 2001. Mitochondrial expression and function of GAS-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 276:20551–20558. 10.1074/jbc.M011066200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kowalski JR, Dube H, Touroutine D, Rush KM, Goodwin PR, et al. 2014. The anaphase-promoting complex (APC) ubiquitin ligase regulates GABA transmission at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 58:62–75. 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krajacic P, Pistilli EE, Tanis JE, Khurana TS, Lamitina ST.. 2013. FER-1/Dysferlin promotes cholinergic signaling at the neuromuscular junction in C. elegans and mice. Biol. Open. 2:1245–1252. 10.1242/bio.20135637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lewis JA, Wu CH, Berg H, Levine JH.. 1980. The genetics of levamisole resistance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 95:905–928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu P, Ge Q, Chen B, Salkoff L, Kotlikoff MI, et al. 2011. Genetic dissection of ion currents underlying all-or-none action potentials in C. elegans body-wall muscle cells. J. Physiol. 589:101–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu X, Timchenko NA, Timchenko LT.. 1999. Cardiac elav-type RNA-binding protein (ETR-3) binds to RNA CUG repeats expanded in myotonic dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:53–60. 10.1093/hmg/8.1.53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahjneh I, Lochmüller H, Muntoni F, Abicht A.. 2013. DOK7 limb-girdle myasthenic syndrome mimicking congenital muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 23:36–42. 10.1016/j.nmd.2012.06.355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin AA, Richmond JE.. 2018. The sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum calcium ATPase SCA-1 regulates the Caenorhabditis elegans nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ACR-16. Cell Calcium. 72:104–115. 10.1016/j.ceca.2018.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Milne CA, Hodgkin J.. 1999. ETR-1, a homologue of a protein linked to myotonic dystrophy, is essential for muscle development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 9:1243–1246. 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80504-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Montagnese F, Klupp E, Karampinos DC, Biskup S, Gläser D, et al. 2017. Two patients with GMPPB mutation: The overlapping phenotypes of limb-girdle myasthenic syndrome and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy dystroglycanopathy. Muscle Nerve. 56:334–340. 10.1002/mus.25485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ockeloen CW, Gilhuis HJ, Pfundt R, Kamsteeg EJ, Agrawal PB, et al. 2012. Congenital myopathy caused by a novel missense mutation in the CFL2 gene. Neuromuscul. Disord. 22:632–639. 10.1016/j.nmd.2012.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Palikaras K, Tavernarakis N.. 2016. Intracellular assessment of ATP levels in Caenorhabditis elegans. BIO-PROTOCOL. 6:e22048. 10.21769/bioprotoc.2048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Park M, Penick EC, Edwards JG, Kauer JA, Ehlers MD.. 2004. Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science. 305:1972–1975. 10.1126/science.1102026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinan-Lucarré B, Tu H, Pierron M, Cruceyra PI, Zhan H, et al. 2014. C. elegans punctin specifies cholinergic versus GABAergic identity of postsynaptic domains. Nature. 511:466–470. 10.1038/nature13313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rapti G, Richmond J, Bessereau JL.. 2011. A single immunoglobulin-domain protein required for clustering acetylcholine receptors in C. elegans. Embo J. 30:706–718. 10.1038/emboj.2010.355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Richard M, Boulin T, Robert VJP, Richmond JE, Bessereau JL.. 2013. Biosynthesis of ionotropic acetylcholine receptors requires the evolutionarily conserved ER membrane complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci Usa. 110:E1055–63. 10.1073/pnas.1216154110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Richmond JE, Jorgensen EM.. 1999. One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Nat Neurosci. 2:791–798. 10.1038/12160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rodríguez Cruz PM, Sewry C, Beeson D, Jayawant S, Squier W, et al. 2014. Congenital myopathies with secondary neuromuscular transmission defects; a case report and review of the literature. Neuromuscul. Disord. 24:1103–1110. 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schubert MB, Vilarinho L.. 2020. Molecular basis of Leigh syndrome: a current look. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 15:31. 10.1186/s13023-020-1297-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sha L, Daitoku H, Araoi S, Kaneko Y, Takahashi Y, et al. 2017. Asymmetric arginine dimethylation modulates mitochondrial energy metabolism and homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 37:e00504. 10.1128/mcb.00504-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shen Q, He B, Lu N, Conradt B, Grant BD, et al. 2013. Phagocytic receptor signaling regulates clathrin and epsinmediated cytoskeletal remodeling during apoptotic cell engulfment in C. elegans. Development. 140:3230–3243. 10.1242/dev.093732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sieburth D, Ch'ng QLim, Dybbs M, Tavazoie M, Kennedy S, et al. 2005. Systematic analysis of genes required for synapse structure and function. Nature. 436:510–516. 10.1038/nature03809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Timmons L, Court DL, Fire A.. 2001. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene. 263:103–112. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00579-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Touroutine D, Fox RM, Von Stetina SE, Burdina A, Miller DM, et al. 2005.  acr-16 encodes an essential subunit of the levamisole-resistant nicotinic receptor at the Caenorhabditis elegans neuromuscular junction. J. Biol. Chem. 280:27013–27021. 10.1074/jbc.M502818200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tu H, Pinan-Lucarré B, Ji T, Jospin M, Bessereau JL.. 2015. C. elegans punctin clusters GABAA receptors via neuroligin binding and UNC-40/DCC recruitment. Neuron. 86:1407–1419. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Vashlishan AB, Madison JM, Dybbs M, Bai J, Sieburth D, et al. 2008. An RNAi screen identifies genes that regulate GABA synapses. Neuron. 58:346–361. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang H, Traub LM, Weixel KM, Hawryluk MJ, Shah N, et al. 2006. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of ENaC: Role of epsin. J Biol Chem. 281:14129–14135. 10.1074/jbc.M512511200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang Z, Edwards JG, Riley N, Provance DW, Karcher R, et al. 2008. Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell. 135:535–548. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wendland B, Steece KE, Emr SD.. 1999. Yeast epsins contain an essential N-terminal ENTH domain, bind clathrin and are required for endocytosis. Embo J. 18:4383–4393. 10.1093/emboj/18.16.4383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and methods required to confirm the conclusions of this work are within the article, figures, and tables. Table S1 is a list of all genes identified in the RNAi screen that were confirmed by time course assays and sequencing. Supplemental material, including Table S1, Figure S1, and Figure S2 is available at figshare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.13698844.


Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES