Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2020 Aug 9;16(3):617–624. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02462-5

Serum sodium variability and acute kidney injury: a retrospective observational cohort study on a hospitalized population

Gianmarco Lombardi 1, Pietro Manuel Ferraro 2,3,, Alessandro Naticchia 2, Giovanni Gambaro 1
PMCID: PMC8049924  PMID: 32776204

Abstract

Aim of our study was to analyze the association between serum sodium (Na) variability and acute kidney injury (AKI) development. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study on the inpatient population admitted to Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014 with inclusion of adult patients with ≥ 2 Na and ≥ 2 serum creatinine measurements. We included only patients with ≥ 2 Na measurements before AKI development. The outcome of interest was AKI. The exposures of interest were hyponatremia, hypernatremia and Na fluctuations before AKI development. Na variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were fitted to obtain hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the exposures of interest and AKI. Overall, 56,961 patients met our inclusion criteria. During 1541 person-years of follow-up AKI occurred in 1450 patients. In multivariable hazard models, patients with pre-existent dysnatremia and those who developed dysnatremia had a higher risk of AKI compared with patients with normonatremia. Logistic models suggested a higher risk for AKI in the 3rd (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18, 1.70, p < 0.001) and 4th (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24, 1.91, p < 0.001) highest quartiles of Na CV with a significant linear trend across quartiles (p trend < 0.001). This association was also independent from Na highest and lowest peak value. Dysnatremia is a common condition and is positive associated with AKI development. Furthermore, high Na variability might be considered an independent early indicator for kidney injury development.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11739-020-02462-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury, Electrolyte disorders, Hyponatremia, Hypernatremia, Epidemiological study

Introduction

Electrolyte disturbances are common disorders in the hospitalized population [1]. Serum sodium (Na) imbalance is frequently observed in the hospital setting [2]. Dysnatremia conditions (including hyponatremia [Na < 135 mEq/L] and hypernatremia [Na > 145 mEq/L] are reported in approximately 30–40% of all hospital admissions [3].

Medical and scientific interest on these conditions is justified by the significant burden of Na disorders on the patient’s prognosis [4]. Both hyponatremia and hypernatremia have been widely associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, as suggested by recently published studies, even small fluctuations in serum Na levels have been associated with a significant increase of in-hospital mortality [58].

As the main organ involved in water metabolism and homeostasis, the kidney is generally the main culprit for such disorders. Defective urine dilution with disproportionally high water intake causes hyponatremia. On the other way around, disorders involving urine concentration with inadequately low water intake cause hypernatremia [9, 10]. Therefore, it is not surprising that kidney diseases, especially acute kidney injury (AKI), characterized by an abrupt reduction in renal function, are commonly associated with these pathological conditions [1115].

On the other hand, as sparsely reported in medical literature, an inverse relationship between dysnatremia and AKI emerges, where Na imbalance precedes and predicts kidney damage. A plausible cross-talk on a biological and pathogenetic ground might justify such relationship [1618], but it still remains poorly investigated [14, 19].

The aim of our study is to analyze the association between dysnatremia, in the whole range of its manifestations (hyponatremia, hypernatremia and mild Na fluctuations in the normonatremic range), and AKI development using a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients.

Methods

Setting and study population

We performed a retrospective observational study on the hospitalized population admitted to Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, a tertiary level hospital serving more than 1 million people in Rome, between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014. We included only adult patients (aged 18 years or older) with at least two serum Na (with consensual serum glucose) and at least two serum creatinine measurements during hospital stay. For analysis and data calculation we included only patients with at least two Na measurements before AKI development. Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were excluded. Study patients were included at the time of their first hospital admission. If a patient was hospitalized multiple times during the study period, we considered only the first one.

Data collection

All data were extracted from the hospital electronic database. We exported the following demographic, clinical and laboratory data: age, sex, serum Na, glucose, creatinine, primary and secondary ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis codes at hospital discharge.

Definitions

Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to creatinine kinetics criteria [20].

In-hospital AKI was defined as AKI developed after ≥ 48 h from hospital admission.

Patients were grouped according to all Na values recorded during hospital stay and preceding AKI development in the following dysnatremic groups: hyponatremia (Na value < 135 mmol/L), hypernatremia (Na value > 145 mmol/L), normonatremia (lowest/highest Na values ≥ 135 mmol/L and ≤ 145 mmol/L). In patients with mixed dysnatremia, only the first Na disorder (what happened first), hypo or hypernatremia, was considered.

All Na levels were corrected for the dilutional effect associated with hyperglycemia using a validated method [21].

Na variability (or fluctuations) was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the ratio between the standard deviation and the mean of all Na values preceding AKI development.

Comorbid conditions (cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, gastrointestinal diseases, genitourinary disorders, endocrine/metabolic disorders, infectious and respiratory diseases) were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. The Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index score [22] was calculated for each hospital admission using primary and secondary diagnosis ICD-9-CM codes at hospital discharge.

ESKD was identified using administrative data (ICD-9 CM codes using chronic ESKD criteria: procedure codes for arteriovenous fistula creation or revision (39.27, 39.42, 39.43, and 39.93); history of ESKD requiring either kidney transplant (identified through discharge diagnosis ICD-9 V42.0) or maintenance dialysis (ICD-9 V45.1, V45.11, V45.12, V56, V56.0, V56.8). Dialysis criteria were: any of the following procedure codes: 39.95 (hemodialysis), V45.1 (renal dialysis status), V56.0 (extracorporeal dialysis), or V56.1 (fitting and adjustment of extracorporeal dialysis catheter); the initiation of dialysis in a patient with no known history of prior dialysis (ICD-9p 39.95, 54.98)) or laboratory data (baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2). The baseline GFR was estimated for each hospital admission with the CKD-EPI formula [23] using the first creatinine value read at hospital admission.

Outcomes and covariates

The outcome of interest was in-hospital AKI development.

The exposures of interest were the dysnatremia groups and Na fluctuations (expressed as quartiles of CV and analyzed as categorical and numeric variable).

The covariates that were used for risk adjustment in multivariable regression analyses were: age, sex, Charlson/Deyo score, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR at hospital admission. Survival time was defined as the time from in-hospital admission to primary outcome, loss to follow-up or censoring, whichever occurred first.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were expressed as means with standard deviations (SDs) (normal distribution) or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) (skewed distribution). Normality of distributions was evaluated by visual inspection of histogram and Q-Q plot.

To explore the association between dysnatremia and AKI, we used a cause-specific regression hazard model. To confirm our results, as sensitivity analysis, we performed subdistribution hazard models considering in-hospital death as competitive risk. Cumulative acute kidney outcome was obtained using the cumulative incidence function for competitive risk. Time at risk started when Na disorder (hypo- or hypernatremia) was first observed, in normonatremic patients at first Na measurement. All alive patients were censored at the time of hospital discharge. Unadjusted and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported for all survival analyses.

A logistic regression model, unadjusted and adjusted for all covariates, was fitted to obtain the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI of the association between the quartiles of Na CV and in-hospital AKI. Three models were built: Model 1 represents unadjusted ORs; Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, baseline eGFR; Model 3 was adjusted for Na lowest and highest peak value in addition to factors included in Model 2. The first CV quartile was used as reference. A p value for trend was calculated by treating quartiles as continuous variables in each model.

To evaluate the modification effects of subgroups on the relationship between dysnatremia and AKI development, a preplanned subgroup analysis was performed. The study population was stratified in the following subgroups: age (< 60 or ≥ 60 years old), sex (men or women), comorbidities (cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, gastrointestinal diseases, genitourinary disorders, endocrine/metabolic disorders, infectious and respiratory diseases), baseline eGFR (< 60 or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

For analysis and data calculation, we used R statistics (version 3.4.4, R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform). A p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Ethical

The ethics committee of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS approved the research protocol (Prot. number 34327/18 ID 2210).

Results

A total of 56,961 patients met our inclusion criteria. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the study population. In total, 22,068 (38.7%) had cardiovascular diseases, 18,070 (31.7%) had malignancies, 9120 (16.0%) had gastrointestinal diseases, 6328 (11.1%) had genitourinary disorders, 10,070 (17.7%) had endocrine/metabolic disorders, 3049 (5.4%) infectious diseases, 7625 (13.4%) respiratory diseases, with a mean eGFR at hospital admission of 79.6 (SD 25.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 and a median Na value at hospital admission of 140 mEq/L (IQR 138.0–142.0, range lowest-highest 101.0–175.0 mEq/L) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population

All n = 56,961 Normonatremia n = 44,178 Hyponatremia n = 8803 Hypernatremia n = 3980 p value
Age, years, mean (SD) 60.9 (18.0) 59.3 (18.0) 65.7 (17.4) 67.8 (15.6) < 0.001
Males, n (%) 26,632 (46.8) 20,368 (46.1) 4411 (50.1) 1853 (46.6) < 0.001
Charlson/Deyo score, n (%) < 0.001
 0 43,957 (77.2) 35,156 (79.6) 6138 (69.7) 2663 (66.9)
 1 9082 (15.9) 6477 (14.7) 1692 (19.2) 913 (22.9)
 2 2169 (3.8) 1456 (3.3) 470 (5.3) 243 (6.1)
 > 2 1753 (3.1) 1089 (2.5) 503 (5.7) 161 (4.0)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Cardiovascular 22,068 (38.7) 16,263 (36.8) 3795 (43.1) 2010 (50.5) < 0.001
 Malignancies 18,070 (31.7) 13,672 (30.9) 3166 (36.0) 1232 (31.0) < 0.001
 Gastrointestinal 9120 (16.0) 6757 (15.3) 1874 (21.3) 489 (12.3) < 0.001
 Genitourinary 6328 (11.1) 4593 (10.4) 1175 (13.3) 560 (14.1) < 0.001
 Endocrine/metabolic 10,070 (17.7) 7520 (17.0) 1709 (19.4) 841 (21.1) < 0.001
 Infectious 3049 (5.4) 1740 (3.9) 1008 (11.5) 301 (7.6) < 0.001
 Respiratory 7625 (13.4) 4871 (11.0) 1781 (20.2) 973 (24.4) < 0.001
eGFR, mean (SD), mL/min/1.73 m2* 79.6 (25.9) 81.4 (25.2) 75.0 (28.1) 70.7 (25.5) < 0.001
Na, median (IQR), mEq/L* 140.0 (138.0, 142.0) 140.0 (139.0, 142.0) 135.0 (132.0, 139.0) 144.0 (141.0, 146.0) < 0.001
Na CV, median (IQR) 1.3 (0.7,1.9) 1.0 (0.5, 1.5) 2.3 (1.7, 3.0) 2.1 (1.5, 2.9) < 0.001

*Value at hospital admission

In the study population, 44,178 stayed in a normonatremic condition while in 12,783 (22.4%) a dysnatremic status occurred (hyponatremia in 8803 [15.5%], hypernatremia in 3980 [7.0%]). Dysnatremic patients aged older (59.3 years [SD 18.0], 65.7 years [SD 17.4], 67.8 years [SD 15.6], in normo-, hypo-, hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001) with a higher prevalence in males (46.1%, 50.1%, 46.6%, in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001). Hyponatremia, and hypernatremia showed a worse comorbidity index, with a higher prevalence in cardiovascular diseases (36.8%, 43.1%, 50.5% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001), malignancicies (30.9%, 36.0%, 31.0% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001), genitourinary disorders (10.4%, 13.3%, 14.1% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001), endocrine/metabolic disorders (17.0%, 19.4%, 21.1% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001), infectious diseases (3.9%, 11.5%, 7.6% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001), respiratory diseases (11.0%, 20.2%, 24.4% in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001). Lower eGFR was observed in patients with Na disorders (81.4 mL/min [SD 25.2], 75.0 mL/min [SD 28.1], 70.7 mL/min [SD 25.5] in normo-, hypo- and hypernatremics, respectively, p < 0.001).

Coefficient of Na variation (Na CV) was used to describe Na fluctuation in the study cohort. Patients with higher Na variability showed worse comorbidty index and higher prevalence in comorbidities. Older age and lower baseline eGFR was also observed in subjects with higher Na fluctuations (Table 2).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the study population stratified by quartile of Na coefficient of variation (CV)

1st
CV ≤ 0.71
n = 14,580
2nd
0.71 < CV ≤ 1.25
n = 14,037
3rd
1.25 < CV ≤ 1.94
n = 14,206
4th
CV > 1.94
n = 14,138
p value
Age, years, mean (SD) 57.8 (18.3) 60.5 (17.9) 62.1 (17.3) 63.2 (18.0) < 0.001
Men, n (%) 6587 (45.2) 6806 (48.5) 6925 (48.7) 6314 (44.7) < 0.001
Charlson/Deyo score, n (%) < 0.001
 0 11,771 (80.7) 10,869 (77.4) 10,754 (75.7) 10,563 (74.7)
 1 2063 (14.1) 2232 (15.9) 2375 (16.7) 2412 (17.1)
 2 411 (2.8) 531 (3.8) 585 (4.1) 642 (4.5)
 > 2 335 (2.3) 405 (2.9) 492 (3.5) 521 (3.7)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Cardiovascular 5130 (35.2) 5424 (38.6) 5837 (41.1) 5677 (40.2) < 0.001
 Malignancies 4151 (28.5) 4440 (31.6) 4808 (33.8) 4671 (33.0) < 0.001
 Gastrointestinal 2307 (15.8) 2229 (15.9) 2342 (16.5) 2242 (15.9) 0.363
 Genito/urinary 1408 (9.7) 1502 (10.7) 1617 (11.4) 1801 (12.7) < 0.001
 Endocrine/metabolic 2466 (16.9) 2441 (17.4) 2655 (18.7) 2508 (17.7) 0.001
 Infectious 496 (3.4) 632 (4.5) 820 (5.8) 1101 (7.8) < 0.001
 Respiratory 1277 (8.8) 1654 (11.8) 2122 (14.9) 2572 (18.2) < 0.001
eGFR, mean (SD), mL/min/1.73 m2* 83.0 (25.0) 80.1 (25.5) 78.1 (25.8) 77.3 (27.1) < 0.001
Na, median (IQR), mEq/L* 140.0 (139.0, 142.0) 140.0 (138.0, 142.0) 140.0 (138.0, 142.0) 139.0 (136.0, 142.0) < 0.001
Na CV, median (IQR) 0.5 (0.0, 0.5) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.5 (1.5, 1.7) 2.5 (2.1, 3.1)  < 0.001

*Value at hospital admission

Sodium and AKI

Dysnatremia and AKI

During 1541 years of follow-up, the outcome occurred in 1450 (2.5%, incidence rate 940.9 per 1000 person-year).

A dysnatremic condition was associated with increased risk of AKI development (Table 3). Patients with dysnatremia or patients who developed dysnatremia had a higher risk of AKI occurrence with an HR, in multivariable adjusted model, of 1.87 (95% CI 1.61, 2.16, p < 0.001), HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.41, 1.98, p < 0.001), in hyponatremia and hypernatremia, respectively.

Table 3.

Association of dysnatremia with AKI development

Overall Normonatremia Hyponatremia Hypernatremia
No. of patients 56,961 44,178 8803 3980
Person-years 1541 1167 269 106
Time to AKI, median (IQR), days 8.0 (10.0) 7.0 (8.0)
Kidney outcome
 AKI (N, %) 1450 (2.5) 864 (2.0) 381 (4.3) 205 (5.2)
 AKI per 1000 person-year 940.9 740.4 1416.4 1934.0
Cause-specific hazard model
 HR (95% CI 1.00 (Reference)

1.98 (1.76, 2.24)

p < 0.001

2.69 (2.31, 3.13)

p < 0.001

 HR (95% CI)* 1.00 (Reference)

1.87 (1.61, 2.16)

p < 0.001

1.67 (1.41, 1.98)

p < 0.001

*Adjusted for: age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR at baseline

Sodium variability and AKI

In Table 4, we investigated the association between Na variability and AKI. Unadjusted regression models suggested a higher risk for AKI development in the 2nd (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21, 1.73, p < 0.001), 3rd (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.77, 2.47, p < 0.001) and 4th (OR 2.70, 95% CI 2.30, 3.18, p < 0.001) quartile of Na CV. This association was also observed in the multivariable adjusted model (Model 2) with an OR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.04, 1.50, p = 0.017), an OR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.40, 1.97, p < 0.001) and an OR of 2.12 (95% CI 1.79, 2.51, p < 0.001) in the 2nd, 3rd and in the 4th quartile of Na CV respectively with a significant linear trend across all quartiles (p for trend < 0.001). Of note, even after adjustment for Na lowest and highest peak value (Model 3) the significant and independent relationship was confirmed.

Table 4.

Association between Na variability (CV) and AKI development

No. of events (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) p value for trend OR (95% CI) p value for trend OR (95% CI) p value for trend

Q1

CV ≤ 0.71

209 (1.4) 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001

Q2

0.71 < CV ≤ 1.25

289 (2.1)

1.45 (121, 1.73)

p < 0.001

1.25 (1.04, 1.50)

p = 0.017

1.16 (0.97, 1.40)

p = 0.115

Q3

1.25 < CV ≤ 1.94

418 (2.9)

2.08 (1.77, 2.47)

p < 0.001

1.66 (1.40, 1.97)

p < 0.001

1.41 (1.18, 1.70)

p < 0.001

Q4

CV > 1.94

534 (3.8)

2.70 (2.30, 3.18)

p < 0.001

2.12 (1.79, 2.51)

p < 0.001

1.53 (1.24, 1.91)

p < 0.001

Model 1: Unadjusted model

Model 2: Multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR baseline

Model 3: Multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR baseline, Na lowest and highest peak value

Subgroup analysis

We evaluated the modification effects of subgroups on the relationship between dysnatremia and AKI development performing subgroup analysis (Table 5). A significant interaction was observed in dysnatremic patients older than 60 years, with cardiovascular and endocrine/metabolic disorders; there was also an effect modification only in hyponatremic patients male, with gastrointestinal diseases, genito/urinary disorders and eGFR < 60 mL/min.

Table 5.

Subgroup associations of dysnatremia with AKI development

AKI (hyponatremia sample) AKI (hypernatremia sample)
HR (95% CI) p for interaction HR (95% CI) p for interaction
Age ≥ 60 4.32 (3.26, 5.71) < 0.001 4.26 (2.80, 6.48) 0.003
Age < 60 1.53 (1.34, 1.76) 2.14 (1.81, 2.52)
Male 2.58 (2.12, 3.14) < 0.001 3.23 (2.53, 4.13) 0.075
Female 1.65 (1.41, 1.92) 2.43 (2.00, 2.95)
Cardiovascular 3.35 (2.73, 4.10) < 0.001 4.39 (3.36, 5.73) < 0.001
No cardiovascular 1.42 (1.22, 1.66) 1.85 (1.53, 2.23)
Malignancies 1.85 (1.60, 2.15) 0.069 2.73 (2.30, 3.26) 0.652
No malignancies 2.36 (1.91, 2.92) 2.52 (1.84, 3.45)
Gastrointestinal 1.85 (1.61, 2.11) 0.005 2.68 (2.28, 3.15) 0.960
No gastrointestinal 2.93 (2.19, 3.91) 2.71 (1.97, 4.40)
Genito/urinary 2.04 (1.78, 2.34) 0.031 2.75 (2.32, 3.27) 0.089
No genito/urinary 1.47 (1.13, 1.92) 2.00 (1.44, 2.77)
Endocrine/metabolic 2.25 (1.96, 2.59) < 0.001 3.10 (2.61, 3.70) 0.001
No endocrine/metabolic 1.34 (1.05, 1.71) 1.71 (1.25, 2.34)
Infectious 2.08 (1.83, 2.37) 0.085 2.59 (2.20, 3.05) 0.314
No infectious 1.46 (1.00, 2.14) 3.29 (2.12, 5.11)
Respiratory 2.21 (1.93, 2.54) < 0.001 2.71 (2.24, 3.28) 0.100
No respiratory 1.23 (0.96, 1.59) 2.06 (1.58, 2.69)
eGFR ≥ 60 1.37 (1.17, 1.61) < 0.001 1.95 (1.61, 2.36) 0.123
eGFR < 60 2.28 (1.89, 2.73) 2.51 (1.94, 3.24)

Sensitivity analysis

As sensitivity analysis a subdistribution hazard model between AKI development and dysnatremic groups was built (Supplemental Table 1) using death as competitive risk. The relationship between the outcome of interest and the exposures was confirmed, with a significant and independent increase risk of AKI development in dysnatremic groups (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.58, 2.16, p < 0.001, HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.35, 1.95, p < 0.001, respectively in hyponatremia and hypernatremia condition).

Discussion

Our study demonstrates a strong and independent association between Na disturbances and Na variability with the risk of AKI development. Dysnatremia, hyponatremia or hypernatremia are significantly associated with acute kidney injury and higher Na variability (CV) predicts AKI development during hospital stay.

AKI is a complex clinical syndrome characterized by a sudden reduction in renal function and defined as an increase (absolute or relative) of creatinine levels or a reduction in urinary output [24]. The high burden on in-hospital patient prognosis [25, 26] justifies the medical and scientific interest in this clinical syndrome. Since the kidney is the main organ engaged in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, it is not surprising that renal dysfunctions are frequently associated with water imbalance and so alterations in serum electrolyte levels. In particular, hypo and hypernatremia conditions, often observed in the hospitalized population [1], have been related to kidney injury [1115].

A growing body of recent evidences highlight the relationship between disorders of metabolism and electrolyte homeostasis and strong outcomes [8, 27, 28]. Several studies have described the association between Na balance and kidney function [1113] however, a few of them have considered dysnatremia as predictor of AKI [14, 19] and none has investigated Na variability as a marker in kidney injury development.

During 1541 person-years of follow-up, AKI was observed in 1450 (2.5%) patients (incidence rate 940.9 per 1000 person-year); 588 (40.4%) of them showed a dysnatremia condition (at hospital admission or during hospital stay) before AKI development. As clearly demonstrated by our results, Na disturbances were strongly and independently associated with in-hospital AKI. Of note, higher Na fluctuations were linearly related to an increased risk of AKI independently of Na peak value.

Many pathological conditions may share dysnatremia and AKI such as volume overload or depletion, heart and liver diseases, infectious diseases and partly explain our findings. Under specific conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, cardio-renal syndrome, gastrointestinal diseases or malignancies, hyponatremia has been associated with AKI development [1113]. According to our findings, older patients, with cardiovascular diseases and endocrine/metabolic disorders with dysnatremia were especially associated with increased risk of AKI.

However, an independent relationship between Na disturbances and Na variability emerges from our study. Recently Lee et al., focusing only on an hyponatremic hospitalized population, described an independent correlation between dysnatremia and AKI development, where pre-existing hyponatremia increased the risk of AKI by 30% [19].

Using our retrospective cohort, we decided to go further these findings. Not only pre-existing hyponatremia condition was associated with kidney injury, but also hypernatremia demonstrated as a potential independent predictor of AKI. Interestingly, higher Na variability was often observed before kidney damage. From this point of view, since serum creatinine is such a poor sensitive marker of kidney damage, higher Na fluctuations may anticipate worsening of renal function.

An appropriate question should be whether dysnatremia is a simple bystander or contributing factor of AKI. Dysnatremia and kidney injury may be two different manifestations of a common underlying disease or reflect the severity of the illness and comorbidities of the patient. Volume depletion that generally accompanies hypernatremia is frequently recognized as a common cause of AKI development. On the other hand, Na dilution (or true Na depletion due to diuretics) can be observed in systemic disorders (i.e., heart, liver failure) causing AKI, characterized by increased extracellular volume.

However, according to our results, although we could not exclude residual confounding due to the retrospective nature of the study, a direct pathogenic relationship between Na imbalance and kidney injury might be hypothesized. Concerning this, it is interesting to note the median time between dysnatremia and the onset of AKI (7–8 days), as reported on Table 3. An interesting finding in our study, Na variability and kidney injury were associated independently from Na peak value (highest or lowest), in accordance with what has been shown by other Authors [8, 27], suggesting a potentially more damaging role of Na rapid variations rather than Na absolute value. Evidence suggests that osmotic stress can cause cellular damage, even if we do not know the exact mechanism at kidney level. The direct effect of serum sodium concentration and variation on extracellular tonicity is well known. Serum sodium fluctuations induce water shift in and out of the cells threatening their survival [2931]. A wide variety of experimental models have demonstrated that osmo-stress can evoke multiple apoptotic pathways, inhibit anti-apoptotic gene expression, induce multiple cytokines and reactive oxygen species generation [3234]. Even if we do not know the exact mechanism of osmotic damage at kidney level, it would be consistent with the reported evidence; however, it has yet to be elucidated in detail. Further studies, with a prospective design, are required to carefully explore and confirm such causal association.

Several study limitations have to be reported such as a retrospective and monocentric design, the use of ICD-9-CM codes to identify comorbid conditions, unavailability of information on chronic or acute therapy administered during hospital stay. However, the use of Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index score to account for patient comorbidity (a validated index of diseases severity based on ICD-9-CM codes), a wide general in-hospital cohort and a creatinine-based definition of in-hospital AKI give strength to our results.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that has widely analyzed the association between Na disorders and kidney injury demonstrating that: (i) dysnatremia is a common condition that involves AKI patients; and (ii) high Na variability might be considered a good biological marker that anticipates kidney injury development.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. G.L., P.M.F. and G.G. contributed to the research idea and study design. G.L. contributed to data acquisition. G.G., P.M.F. and G.L. contributed to data analysis/interpretation. P.M.F. and G.L. contributed to statistical analysis. G.L. drafted the paper. G.G., P.M.F. and A.N. contributed to supervision. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting for the overall work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights statement

The study protocol and the waiver of consent were approved by the ethics committee of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS (Approval No. 34327/18 ID 2210). The study was conducted in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

This study waived the requirement for written informed consent due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Funk G-C, Lindner G, Druml W, et al. Incidence and prognosis of dysnatremias present on ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:304–311. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1692-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(Suppl 2):i1–i39. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Upadhyay A, Jaber BL, Madias NE. Incidence and prevalence of hyponatremia. Am J Med. 2006;119:S30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wald R, Jaber BL, Price LL, et al. Impact of hospital-associated hyponatremia on selected outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:294–302. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marshall DC, Salciccioli JD, Goodson RJ, et al. The association between sodium fluctuations and mortality in surgical patients requiring intensive care. J Crit Care. 2017;40:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakr Y, Rother S, Ferreira AMP, et al. Fluctuations in serum sodium level are associated with an increased risk of death in surgical ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:133–142. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318265f576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Topjian AA, Stuart A, Pabalan AA, et al. Greater fluctuations in serum sodium levels are associated with increased mortality in children with externalized ventriculostomy drains in a PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:846–855. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lombardi G, Ferraro PM, Calvaruso L, et al. sodium fluctuations and mortality in a general hospitalized population. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2019;44:604–614. doi: 10.1159/000500916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. 11. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Skorecki K, Chertow GM, Marsden PA. Brenner & Rector's The Kindney. 10. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aronson D, Darawsha W, Promyslovsky M, et al. Hyponatraemia predicts the acute (type 1) cardio-renal syndrome. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16:49–55. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Electrolyte disturbances and acute kidney injury in patients with cancer. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30:534–547. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hackworth WA, Heuman DM, Sanyal AJ, et al. Effect of hyponatraemia on outcomes following orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2009;29:1071–1077. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.01982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Adams D, de Jonge R, van der Cammen T, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients presenting with hyponatremia. J Nephrol. 2011;24:749–755. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.6410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Libório AB, Silva GB, Silva CGCH, et al. Hyponatremia, acute kidney injury, and mortality in HIV-related toxoplasmic encephalitis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16:558–563. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunn FL, Brennan TJ, Nelson AE, Robertson GL. The role of blood osmolality and volume in regulating vasopressin secretion in the rat. J Clin Investig. 1973;52:3212–3219. doi: 10.1172/JCI107521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fitzsimons JT. Angiotensin, thirst, and sodium appetite. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:583–686. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.3.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee Y-J, Song I-K, Jang K-J, et al. Increased AQP2 targeting in primary cultured IMCD cells in response to angiotensin II through AT1 receptor. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F340–350. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00090.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee SW, Baek SH, Ahn SY, et al. The effects of pre-existing hyponatremia and subsequent-developing acute kidney injury on in-hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Waikar SS, Bonventre JV. Creatinine kinetics and the definition of acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:672–679. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008070669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hillier TA, Abbott RD, Barrett EJ. Hyponatremia: evaluating the correction factor for hyperglycemia. Am J Med. 1999;106:399–403. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silveiro SP, Araújo GN, Ferreira MN, et al. Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation pronouncedly underestimates glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2353–2355. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C. Acute kidney injury. Lancet. 2012;380:756–766. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61454-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Medve L, Antek C, Paloczi B, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in Hungarian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2011;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoste EAJ, Clermont G, Kersten A, et al. RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10:R73. doi: 10.1186/cc4915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Yap JQ, Qian Q. Increased mortality risk associated with serum sodium variations and borderline hypo- and hypernatremia in hospitalized adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lombardi G, Ferraro PM, Bargagli M, et al. Hyperchloremia and acute kidney injury: a retrospective observational cohort study on a general mixed medical-surgical not ICU-hospitalized population. Intern Emerg Med. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02165-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Burg MB, Ferraris JD, Dmitrieva NI. Cellular response to hyperosmotic stresses. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:1441–1474. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00056.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Strange K. Cellular volume homeostasis. Adv Physiol Educ. 2004;28:155–159. doi: 10.1152/advan.00034.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watanabe K, Umeda T, Niwa K, et al. A PP6-ASK3 module coordinates the bidirectional cell volume regulation under osmotic stress. Cell Rep. 2018;22:2809–2817. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shapiro L, Dinarello CA. Osmotic regulation of cytokine synthesis in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:12230–12234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.26.12230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.López-Rodríguez C, Aramburu J, Jin L, et al. Bridging the NFAT and NF-kappaB families: NFAT5 dimerization regulates cytokine gene transcription in response to osmotic stress. Immunity. 2001;15:47–58. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00165-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang W-C, Zheng X-J, Du L-J, et al. High salt primes a specific activation state of macrophages, M(Na) Cell Res. 2015;25:893–910. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Internal and Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES