CRISPR/Cas-New Molecular Scissors in Diagnostics and Therapeutics of COVID-19

Abstract

The current pandemic of COVID-19, with its climbing number of cases and deaths, has us searching for tools for rapid, reliable, and affordable methods of detection on one hand, and novel, improved therapeutic strategies on the other. The currently employed RT-PCR method, despite its all-encompassing utility, has its shortcomings. Newer diagnostic tools, based on the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas(CRISPR-Cas) system, with its better diagnostic accuracy measures, have come up to fill that void. These assay platforms are expected to slowly take up the place of COVID-19 diagnostics. Further, the current therapeutic options focus mainly on counteracting the viral proteins and components and their entry into host cells. The CRISPR-based system, especially through the RNA-guided Cas13 approach, can identify the genomic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and provide a novel inhibition strategy for coronaviruses. In this mini-review, we have discussed the available and upcoming CRISPR-based diagnostic assays and the potential of the CRISPR/Cas system as a therapeutic or prevention strategy in COVID-19. CRISPR-Cas system shows promise in both diagnostics as well as therapeutics and may as well change the face of molecular diagnosis and precision medicine.

Introduction

With the declaration of the Nobel Prize 2020 in Chemistry to Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, there has been a lot of curiosity around their discovered—new molecular scissors CRISPR/Cas system. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas (CRISPR-Cas) system was first identified in bacteria, where it provides innate protection to the host cell against invading viruses. It continues to drive major advances in the field of molecular technology with newer genome editing tools [1, 2]. The currently available tools for modifying genomes in experimental systems can be divided into four classes—nucleases, base editors, transposases/recombinases and prime editors [3]. The CRISPR-Cas system includes both DNA- and RNA-targeting nucleases such as Cas9 and Cas13, respectively.

The CRISPR-Cas bacterial immune system is broadly divided into classes 1 and 2. The class 1 CRISPR system is composed of multiple Cas proteins, mediating pre-crRNA processing and binding, and interference by cleavage. Class 1 can further be divided into three types, namely types I, III, and IV. With recent computational advances, 33 novel variants or subtypes of CRISPR system have been identified in class 1 category [4]. Class 2, on the other hand, is considerably simple. It includes single, multidomain crRNA binding Cas proteins. This system, consists of both DNA- and RNA-targeting Cas proteins, is further subdivided into types II, V, and VI. Among these, RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas13 is categorized under type VI, and it is the only known RNA-targeting-resistant mechanism in bacteria in addition to the type III CRISPR system in class 1 [5, 6] The year 2020 has be-fallen us with a global crisis of COVID-19 and till date there is a lack of a robust diagnostic method with high sensitivity as well as specificity; and a lack of efficient therapeutics that has shown a good recovery-rate. CRISP/Cas holds the potential to be both an excellent diagnostic tool as well as be the treatment/ vaccine that has been eluding scientists worldwide. We have compiled this mini-review with an aim to give a brief yet updated opinion on CRISP/Cas promise for COVID-19 pandemic. (Table 1 and Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of COVID-19 diagnostic method

	Viral genome (NGS)	Viral RNA Test (RT-PCR)	Viral RNA test (CRISPR)	Serological antibody tests	Viral antigen test
Accessibility	low	low	Medium	High	High
Accuracy	High	High	High	Medium	low
Affordability	Very low	low	Medium	High	High
Airway swab or sputum	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Blood/Serum	High	Medium	Medium	High	High
Cross reactivity	Low	Low	Low	Medium	Medium
Genome sequencing	yes	No	No	No	No
Immunity status	No	No	No	Yes	No
Infection status	Yes	yes	yes	No	Yes
Point of care	Very low	low	Medium	High	High
Sample preparation	High	High	Medium	Low	Low
Test time	High	Medium	low	Very low	Very low
User friendly	low	low	Medium	High	High

1. High or Yes; 2. Medium; 3. Low; 4. Very low or No

Fig. 1.

Application of CRISPR technology for COVID 19 research

In this mini-review, we have searched through the Pubmed database for articles on the applications of CRISPR/Cas in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with the keywords “CRISPR/Cas”, “CRISPR”, “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “diagnostics”, and “therapeutics” and briefly reviewed the existing CRISPR/Cas-based diagnostic tools in COVID-19 and further elaborated on its possible therapeutic applications.

As Diagnostic Tool for COVID 19

COVID-19 is caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is a novel pathogenic member of the betacoronavirus genus, having 79% genetic similarity with the SARS-CoV, as discovered by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) [7, 8]. The major complications associated with COVID-19 were pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury [9], and sepsis or systemic inflammation [10]. Viricidal agents play important role in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission [11]. Currently, two molecular diagnostic approaches in detection of COVID-19 are- metagenomics and RT-PCR [12, 13]. However, several other molecular methods are being considered and under investigation, one of them being CRISPR/Cas, the widely used gene editing tool. The collateral cleavage activities of a unique group of Cas nucleases which form the basis of this tool was discovered not very long ago and has been tested for in vitro nucleicaciddetection since [14]. After the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, rapid detection of the virus to hasten subsequent implementation of treatment strategies, to control the spread of the infection, and to detect asymptomatic infections and possible mutant strains of the virus, has become a matter of utmost importance. However, the mainstay of diagnosis at this time-point, RT-PCR, may not detect the virus as viral load fluctuates in different stages of infection, and further depends on pre-analytical factors is major diagnostic challenges include time-consuming, errors during sample collection, sample transport, shaking of blood samples, leading to hemolysis while pre-analytical inconsistencies have been demonstrated to reduce the stability of extracted viral RNA and PCR conditions [15–17]. Further, a rapid diagnostic tool is in demand, which can shorten the turnaround time and reduce the resources for COVID-19 testing.

CRISPR methods have come forward in this regard [18, 19]. CRISPR diagnostic tests can potentially reduce laboratory load and patient costs, as it can be performed using simple reagents and point-of-care devices such as paper-based lateral flow assays, such as the sensitivity enzymatic reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK)-based STOPCovid [20]. CRISPR-based diagnostic methods rely primarily on the principle that nucleic acids are effective biomarkers for diseases. It works by identifying specific sequences (Cas-SgRNA can cleave a target specifically) associated with the infective virus and cleaving it by virtue of Cas nucleases to generate as readable signal [21] The specificity of SgRNA targets mainly requires for the protospacer motif make it possible for the CRISPR system to distinguish between various strains of viruses [22]. This differentiation of viral strains is important specificity.

(Fig. 2). Recently, Broughton et al.showedits promising potential for in vitro diagnostics using Cas12 [23]. Hou et al. have exploited the polymerase-mediated DNA amplification by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) as well as the CRISPR/Cas-mediated enzymatic signal amplification to develop a rapid, and highly sensitive, easy-to-use assay [14]. An Indian-based assay, the FELUDA test has come up as a faster and cheaper alternative with 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity [24]. (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

A simplified flow of detection of COVID-19 by CRISPR-Cas method

Table 2.

CRISPR technology used for diagnostic method in various countries

Countries	Name of the method	Clinical diagnostic samples	Cas enzyme	Target region	Amplification method	Limit of detection (copy/μL)	Readout method	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Total assay time (min)	References
China	CRISPR/Cas12a-NER	31	LbCas12a	E	RT-RAA	10	FL / NE	100	100	45	[43]
China	SENA	295	LbCas12a	N/O	RT-qPCR	< 2	FL	100	100	60	[44]
China	CRISPR-COVID	114	LwCas13a	ORF1ab	RT-RPA	0.3	FL	100	100	40	[14]
Germany	–	24	LwCas13a	ORF1a/N/S	RT-RPA	–	Lf	55.5	100	60	[45]
Japan	CONAN	31	Cas3 and LbCas12a	N	RT-LAMP	< 100	FL/Lf	90	95	40	[46]
Netherlands	DETECTR	378	LbCas12a	N	RT-LAMP	–	FL/Lf	93	95.5	30	[47]
Saudi Arabia	iSCAN	24	LbCas12a and AapCas12b	N/E	RT-LAMP	0.2	FL/Lf	86	100	60	[48]
Thailand	SHERLOCK	154	LwCas13a	S	RT-RPA	2.1	FL/Lf	96	100	55–85	[49]
United Kingdom	–	3	LwCas13a	N	RT-PCR/RT-RPA	0.5	FL	100	NA	75	[50]
USA	DETECTR	82	LbCas12a	N/E	RT-LAMP	10	FL/Lf	95	100	30–40	[51]
USA	STOPCovid	17	AapCas12b	N	RT-LAMP	2	FL/Lf	91.7	100	40–70	[20]
USA	ITP-CRISPR	8	LbCas12a	N/E	RT-LAMP	10	FL	75	100	25	[52]
USA	CRISPR-FDS	35	LbCas12a	ORF1ab/N	RT-PCR/RT-RPA	2	FL	100	71.4	50	[53, 54]
USA	SHINE	50	LwCas13a	ORF1a	RT-RPA	10	FL/Lf	90	100	40	[39, 55]
USA	CREST	1808	LwCas13a	N	RT-PCR	10	FL/Lf	88.8	100	110	[56, 57]

Some of the advantages of the CRISPR/Cas-based technology over qRT–PCR include- single target specificity, reduced turnaround time, isothermal signal amplification, no requirement of a complex laboratory setup, and easily-accessible reporting with lateral flow strips [18]. Further, in comparison to mNGS and the PCR, the CRISPR-based method had a 100% specificity, while PCR could detect 90.4% (47/52) of the positive cases, with Ct’s ranging from 28.8 to 40.4 and a median Ct of 35.8, and requires more time than the former method. CRISPR was also highly sensitive for all 52 cases (100%), with fold change ranging from 5.0 to 66.3 and a median fold change of 22.8. Altogether, CRISPR-based assays have better diagnostic value without the need of thermal cyclers [14].

Advanced Approaches for CRISPR/Cas Mediated Diagnosis

The two CRISPR based methods namely, DNA Endonuclease-Targeted CRISPR Trans Reporter (DETECTR) and SHERLOCK methods have been proposed as diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2, and the protocols designed specifically for SARS-CoV-2 detection can be accomplished in an hour or less, and at relatively low cost [25, 26]. Recently, Zhang et al. reported specific SHERLOCK technology which is a CRISPR/Cas13 based nucleic acid detection technique for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 [26]. In this technique, S and ORF1ab protein genes of coronavirus genome have been targeted. Cas13 identifies and binds to previously determined target sequence which leads to random cleavage of surrounding ssRNA molecules. SHERLOCK technology used a quenched fluorescent ssRNA reporter. The presence of ssRNA coronavirus genome in samples activated Cas13, which resulted in the production of quantifiable signals. Its sensitivity has been improved through amplification of targeted DNA or RNA by RPA or reverse transcriptase-RPA (RT-RPA) prior to the start of reaction. Subsequently, amplified DNA is converted to RNA by combination of RPA and T7 transcription. Finally, detection is made by simultaneous incorporation of the ssRNA reporter (Biotin-RNA-FITC). Viral genome is detected at attomolar concentration using SHERLOCK technology. The test can be carried out starting with RNA isolated from patient samples, as used for qRT-PCR assays, and can be read out using a dipstick in less than an hour, without requiring various instrumentation. As a result, application of SHERLOCK as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection is much faster than qRT-PCR and has high sensitivity of 93.1%. Consequently, SHERLOCK technology could slowly replace qRT-PCR technique considering the high demand for rapid diagnosis tests in current global pandemic state of COVID-19 [27]. The proposed SHERLOCK method generates a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 when the S and Orflab gene sequences are detected [28].

To overcome the difficulties faced in qRT–PCR-based assays, there is combined isothermal amplification with CRISPR–Cas12 DETECTR technology was developed for rapid (30–40 min) detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. This assay performed simultaneous reverse transcription and isothermal amplification using loop-mediated amplification (RT–LAMP) [28] for RNA extracted from nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs and followed by Cas12 detection of predefined coronavirus sequences, after which cleaved reporter molecule confirms detection of the virus. The DETECTR assay developed gives comparable accuracy to qRT–PCR and used routine protocols and commercially available reagents. However, some key advantages of the approach over qRT–PCR include isothermal signal amplification avoiding the need for thermocycling, fast turnaround time, single nucleotide target specificity, integration with accessible and easy-to-use reporting formats such as lateral flow strips and no requirement for complex laboratory instrumentations. The time taken to develop and validate this SARS-CoV-2 DETECTR assay showed that this technology can be quickly mobilized to diagnose infections from emerging zoonotic viruses [21]. The DETECTR method has been focused to identify the presence of the N and E gene variants specific to SARS-CoV-2. A positive result is generated if both genes are detected, and the procedure has been optimized to exclude false positives resulting from related coronaviruses [19, 21].

Recent Advances in Therapeutics

The diagnostic applicability of CRISPR/Cas against SARS-CoV-2 in already under progress. Keeping up with the pace, researchers have adopted the CRISPR-Casmechanism as a therapeutic strategy to correct genetic abnormalities in human cells in hope of treating diseases or as an invaluable tool in chemical biology [29–32]. Since it confers protective immunity against invading pathogens such as bacteriophages, it has been co-opted to use as a potential antiviral therapy [33–36]. Due to its RNA targeting properties, the CRISPR-Cas13 has been successfully demonstrated as an antiviral strategy against single-strand RNA viruses such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), influenza A virus (IAV), and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in human cells. Thus, the Cas13-assisted restriction of viral expression and readout (CARVER) had earlier been developed which demonstrated RNA-targeting capacity [37]. Recently, Abbott et al., using an RNA-guided RNA endonuclease Cas13d, have established that the CRISPR technology can be used to cleave SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in mammalian cells [38, 39]. Cas13d is much smaller than the other members of the Cas13 family and known for having strong target cleavage activity [40]. Further, by aligning the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from 47 patients with those of SARS-CoV and MERS, high levels of conservation in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene and the Nucleocapsid (N) gene were observed. With the aid of a bioinformatic pipeline, a crRNA library was built with less off-target binding to the human genome, to target different coronaviruses in the RdRP and N protein coding regions. Indeed, in lung epithelial cell line A549, it has showcased the ability to degrade viral genetic material.

This new technology has been coined Prophylactic Antiviral CRISPR in huMAN cells (PAC-MAN). A key advantage is that it can be a potential pan-coronavirus inhibition strategy by targeting conserved regions across different coronaviruses using a single cocktail containing different crRNAs. Computationally, it has been shown that just three crRNAs are enough to target all betacoronaviruses implicated in SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 [41].

Lotfi et al. discussed the application of CRISPR/Cas13 in lieu of the potential therapeutic targets in the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome (Fig. 3). Several non-structural, accessory, and structural proteins have been evaluated which can be targeted by the CRISPR/Cas13 system with more sensitivity and specificity [42].

Fig. 3.

SARS-CoV-2 structure-based function annotation of genome. The variable coloured regions represent the various appropriate targeting sites of SARS-CoV-2

Limitations

One short coming of this strategy is the potential crRNA target site mutations, which may decrease its potency as these viruses tend to alter their sequences in response to therapy. But, a simple alteration in the crRNA sequence may solve this road block and will further enable the designing of tools against other viruses. Viral vectors are the most common delivery method for CRISPR/Cas material but many time difficult to deliver the CRISPR/Cas material to mature cells, which are problem for therapeutic clinical applications. In this regard, a synergistic approach with already available clinically administered drugs may be considered. (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Limitation of CRISPR for COVID-19 research

Conclusion

CRISPR-Cas system shows promise in both diagnostics as well as therapeutics and may as well change the face of molecular diagnosis and precision medicine.

Abbreviations

CARVER

Cas13-assisted restriction of viral expression and readout

Cas

CRISPR-associated complex

COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019

CRISPR

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

crRNA

CRISPR RNA

DETECTR

DNA Endonuclease-Targeted CRISPR Trans Reporter

IAV

Influenza virus

LCMV

Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus

MERS

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

PACMAN

Prophylactic Antiviral CRISPR in huMAN cells

RPA

Recombinase Polymerase Amplification

RT-LAMP

Reverse transcription and loop-mediated amplification

RT-PCR

Reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction

SARS

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

SARS-CoV-2

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

SHERLOCK

Specific High Sensitivity Enzymatic Reporter UnLOCKing

STOPCovid

SHERLOCK Testing in One Pot

VSV

Vesicular stomatitis virus

Funding

None.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.