Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1998 Mar 1;39(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/BF03547802

Disease Occurrence and Risk Factor Analysis in Finnish Ayrshire Cows

Sjukdomsförekomst och riskfaktoranalys hos finska Ayrshire kor

PJ Rajala 11,21,✉, YT Grohn 11
PMCID: PMC8050666  PMID: 9592941

Abstract

Disease occurrences and risk factors for the most common diseases among 39,727 Finnish Ayrshire dairy cows belonging to 2338 herds were studied. All the cows calved during 1993 and were followed until the next calving or culling.

Lactational incidence risks, recurrence of, and number of treatments required for one episode of a disease are described for 17 different veterinary diagnoses. The 5 most common diseases and their lactational incidence risks were: acute mastitis (17.0%), anestrus (8.1%), ovarian cysts (7.3%), milk fever (5.4%), and ketosis (4.9%). The highest recurrence probability (14.2%) was observed for acute mastitis, followed by fertility disorders. Milk fever was the one disease that required the most repeated treatments, i.e., almost 30% of the cows were treated at least twice, whereas for most of the other diseases about 10% of the cows required more than one treatment per first episode of the disease.

Logistic regression models were fitted to study the effect of milk yield and other risk factors on the occurrence of the 5 most common diseases. Increasing milk yield was found to be a risk factor for acute mastitis, ovarian cysts, and for anestrus among older cows (parity>2), and for milk fever among younger cows (parity = 2). Several diseases were found to be risk factors for other diseases. kw|Keywords|k]dairy; k]milk yield; k]logistic regression

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Finnish Academy. Computations supporting this research were performed on the Cornell Production Supercomputer Facility (Ithaca, NY), which is supported in part by the National Science Foundation, New York, and the IBM Corporation.

References

  1. L A, LG L, JF A. Foul in the foot (interdigital necrobacillosis) in Danish dairy cows - frequency and possible risk factors. Prev. Vet. Med. 1995;24:73–82. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(95)00473-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. PH B, B V, I E, DB Å. Disease frequencies in dairy cows in Sweden. III. Parturient paresis. Prev. Vet. Med. 1987;5:87–97. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(87)90014-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. C B, AH H. Sole haemorrhages and heel erosion in dairy cows: the influence of housing system on their prevalence and severity. Acta Vet. Scand. 1996;37(4):395–408. doi: 10.1186/BF03548079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. M B-P, AH M, SW M. Interrelationships among health problems and milk production from consecutive lactations in selected Ontario Holstein cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 1990;8:15–24. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90019-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. M B-P, AH M, SW M, I M. Health problems in selected Ontario Holstein cows: frequency of occurences, time to first diagnosis and associations. Prev. Vet. Med. 1990;10:79–89. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90053-K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. R C-A, Sty M, JB S, RA W. The rates and patterns of survivorship and disease in a university dairy herd. Can. Vet. J. 1979;20:177–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O D, A W, A G, G B, H K. Analysis of relationship between veterinary recorded production diseases and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Prod. Sei. 1989;23:67–78. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(89)90006-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. IR D, SW M. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows II. Age, season and sire effects. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984;2:655–670. [Google Scholar]
  9. IR D, Sty M, AH M, WCD S. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows I. The data. Prev. Vet. Med. 1983;1:321–334. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(83)90003-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. IR D, SW M, AH M, WCD S. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows III. Disease and production as determinants of disease. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984;2:671–690. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(84)90013-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. U E, PA O, YT G. Nonlinear mixed model analyses of 5 production disorders of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1993;76:2765–2772. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77614-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HN E, SW M. Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Age and seasonal patterns. J. Dairy Sci. 1980;64:1918–1924. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83159-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HN E. Interrelationships among production and clinical disease in dairy cattle: A review. Can. Vet. J. 1987;28:326–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PR G, AD W, DM B, RJ E, FA G. Basic concepts of bovine lameness. In: Greenough P R, Weaver A D, editors. Lameness in Cattle. Philadephia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1997. pp. 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y G, H S, J S. An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. I. The data, disease occurrence and culling. Acta Vet. Scand. 1986;27:182–195. doi: 10.1186/BF03548163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y G, JR T, ML B. Epidemiolgy and genetic basis of ketosis in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984;3:65–77. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(84)90025-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. YT G, Sty E, JA H. The association between 305-day milk yield and disease in New York dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1995;78:1693–1702. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76794-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. YT G, HN E, CE M, HS S. Epidemiology of metabolic disorders in dairy cattle: Association among host characteristics, disease and production. J. Dairy Sci. 1989;72:1876–1885. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79306-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. YT G, HN E, CE M, HS S. Epidemiology of mammary gland disorders in multiparous Finnish Ayrshire cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 1990;8:241–252. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90082-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. YT G, HN E, CE M, HS S. Epidemiology of reproductive disorders in dairy cattle: Associations among host characteristics, disease and production. Prev. Vet. Med. 1990;8:25–39. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(90)90020-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. YT G, JA H, JL H. Effect of early lactation milk yield on reproductive disorders in dairy cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1994;55:1521–1528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. T H-B, V M, L K. Prevalence of mastitis in Finland. Suomen Eläinlääkärilehti. 1996;4:191–197. [Google Scholar]
  23. H S, K R. Field observations on the incidence of bovine clinical mastitis and teat diseases. Nord. Vet. Med. 1981;33:297–305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SAS Institute Inc.: SAS/STAT® Software: Changes and enhancements, Release 6.10. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc. 1994.
  25. GW S, WG C. Statistical methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989. pp. 234–235. [Google Scholar]
  26. H S. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle III. Factors affecting diseases related to the reproductive performance. Z. Tierz. Zühtungsbiol. 1984;100:139–157. [Google Scholar]
  27. Van JAM A, R H, De W B. Pheno-typic and genetic association between fertility and production in dairy cows. Livestock Prod. Sci. 1989;27:1–12. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES