These authors used perfusion imaging and MR spectroscopy to differentiate oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q deletions from those with intact alleles. NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr and the presence of lipids and lactate were assessed in areas of maximum perfusion in 40 patients. This study showed that as groups, integration of the MRS indices from the region containing the highest cerebral blood volume was useful in distinguishing tumors with 1p/19q abnormalities from those that did not have them.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q chromosome LOH are more sensitive to chemoradiation therapy than those with intact alleles. The usefulness of dynamic susceptibility contrast–PWI-guided 1H-MRS in differentiating these 2 genotypes was tested in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Forty patients with oligodendrogliomas, 1p/19q LOH (n = 23) and intact alleles (n = 17), underwent MR imaging and 2D-1H-MRS. 1H-MRS VOI was overlaid on FLAIR images to encompass the hyperintense abnormality on the largest cross-section of the neoplasm and then overlaid on CBV maps to coregister CBV maps with 1H-MRS VOI. rCBVmax values were obtained by measuring the CBV from each of the selected 1H-MRS voxels in the neoplasm and were normalized with respect to contralateral white matter. Metabolite ratios with respect to ipsilateral Cr were computed from the voxel corresponding to the rCBVmax value. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to ascertain the best model to discriminate the 2 genotypes of oligodendrogliomas. Qualitative evaluation of conventional MR imaging characteristics (patterns of tumor border, signal intensity, contrast enhancement, and paramagnetic susceptibility effect) was also performed to distinguish the 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas.
RESULTS:
The incorporation of rCBVmax value and metabolite ratios (NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr, and lipid + lactate/Cr) into the multivariate logistic regression model provided the best discriminatory classification with sensitivity (82.6%), specificity (64.7%), and accuracy (72%) in distinguishing 2 oligodendroglioma genotypes. Oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH were also more associated with paramagnetic susceptibility effect (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS:
Our preliminary results indicate the potential of combing PWI and 1H-MRS to distinguish oligodendroglial genotypes.
Oligodendroglial neoplasms account for 5%–18% of all gliomas.1 These neoplasms are typically classified into grade II and III oligodendrogliomas according to the WHO classification system. However, this classification is not sensitive and specific for predicting response to therapy and overall survival duration.2 Emerging molecular abnormalities in these neoplasms have shown promise in an accurate diagnosis, which has led to improved strategies in management of specific subtypes.3 The characteristic feature of oligodendrogliomas at the molecular level is loss of the shorter arm of chromosome 1 (1p) or codeletion of 1p and the longer arm of chromosome 19 mutation that harbors tumor suppressor genes. Whereas isolated 19q LOH occurs in astrocytomas, 1p LOH or combined 1p/19q LOH is uncommon in gliomas other than oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas.4,5 Molecular classification in oligodendrogliomas correlates better with clinical outcome compared with the WHO classification system.6 Several clinical studies, including phase III trials, have reported that patients with oligodendroglioma harboring 1p/19q LOH, regardless of the higher tumor grade, demonstrate better prognosis and response to chemoradiation therapy than patients with intact 1p/19q alleles.7–9 Furthermore, patients with 1p/19q LOH exhibit prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival duration subsequent to chemoradiation therapy.6 Thus, differentiation between the 2 genotypes, before initiation of treatment, is of paramount importance because treatment strategy is different.
PWI with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging and 1H-MR spectroscopy have been used to distinguish genotypic profiles of oligodendrogliomas.10–12 Although promising results were reported in the differentiation of LOH in grade II oligodendrogliomas, there was a substantial overlap in patients with grade III oligodendrogliomas.11,12 Using 1H-MR spectroscopy, Jenkinson et al10 reported a higher Cho/Cr ratio in oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q deletion than in those with intact alleles; however, the difference was not significant.
Combined use of PWI and 1H-MR spectroscopy may improve the overall reliability of these advanced MR techniques in preoperative genetic profiling of oligodendrogliomas. Some investigators have used both PWI and 1H-MR spectroscopy to grade oligodendrogliomas.13 However, the accuracy of differentiation was poor because the selection of the 1H-MR spectroscopy voxel was random, regardless of underlining rCBV values. High rCBV is a surrogate marker of neoangiogenesis and is associated with increased mitotic activity.14,15 Thus, we hypothesize that 1H-MR spectroscopy sampling of the “islands” of high rCBV, within the neoplasm, might aid in the selection of the optimal 1H- MR spectroscopy voxel, which in turn might improve the discriminative performance of 1H-MR spectroscopy. In accordance with this hypothesis, Chawla et al16 reported significantly higher Cho/Cr and lipid + lactate/Cr from high-grade oligodendrogliomas than in low-grade neoplasms when 1H-MR spectroscopy voxels were sampled from regions of high cerebral blood flow. Thus in our current study, we investigated whether 1H-MR spectroscopy voxels guided by dynamic susceptibility contrast–PWI will also be useful in discriminating oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH from oligodendrogliomas with intact alleles.
Materials and Methods
Patients
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Histopathologically confirmed oligodendrogliomas or mixed oligoastrocytomas, according to the WHO classification system,2 were included in the study. Because mixed oligoastrocytomas have a prominent composition of oligodendroglial cells, they were included in the oligodendroglioma group. Only treatment-näive patients were included, and patients with prior biopsy or surgery were excluded. Histopathologic diagnosis was obtained in all patients by surgical resection or biopsy after the imaging study. Cytogenic profile was obtained either by fluorescent in situ hybridization on fresh tumor specimens or polymerase chain reaction on paraffin-embedded specimens. Fifty patients with oligodendroglioma were recruited from July 2006 to September 2010. Six patients who did not have a cytogenic profile were excluded from the study. In addition, 4 patients were excluded from the analysis because of suboptimal PWI or 1H-MR spectroscopy data quality. Data analysis was performed on the remaining 40 patients [average age, 45.24 ± 14.04 years; 22 men and 18 women]. These patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with 1p or 1p and 19q LOH (n = 23), and patients with intact alleles (n = 17). Thirteen of 23 patients with 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas had low-grade tumors (WHO grade II), and 10 had high-grade tumors (WHO grade III). Among the 17 oligodendrogliomas with intact alleles, 9 were of low grade and 8 were of high grade.
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Surgical specimens were dissociated in tissue culture medium and directly processed for interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. The probes for 1p36 (PAX7) and 19q13.4 (CTC284K17) were labeled by nick translation with ChromoTide AlexaFluor 594-dUTP (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, California). The BAC clone for 1q31 (CTC224I21) was labeled by nick translation with ChromoTide fluorescein-12-dUTP (Molecular Probes). The probe for 19ptel (D19S238E) was labeled with SpectrumGreendUTP (Vysis, Des Plaines, Illinois). The probes were applied to tumor cell suspension slides and codenatured at 75°C on an Isotemp 125D heat block (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). Slides were incubated overnight at 37°C in a moist slide moat (Boekel Scientific, Feasterville, Pennsylvania) and were washed in 0.4 × standard saline citrate solution at 73°C for 2 minutes followed by a 1-minute wash in 2 × standard saline citrate/0.1% NP-40, and counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri). Fluorescent signals from 100 cells were evaluated at 100 × with a Axioplan fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany) equipped with the proper filter sets. An Applied Imaging System device (Applied Imaging, San Jose, California) was used to record images of stained cells.
Polymerase Chain Reaction
The allelic status of 1p or 19q was assessed by LOH assays in constitutional/tumor DNA pairs by use of microsatellite markers on 1p36 (D1S1608, D1S1161, and D1S1597) and 19q13 (D19S431, D19S559, and D19S601), as described previously.17 Tumor DNA was extracted from microdissected, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections and constitutional DNA from blood leukocytes or paraffin sections of the adjacent uninvolved brain.
MR Imaging
MR imaging and multivoxel 2D 1H-MRS studies were performed on a 3T Tim Trio MR scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by use of a 12-channel phased array head coil. The imaging protocol included a 3-plane scout localizer, axial T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo (TR, 1620 ms; TE, 3.9 ms; TI, 950 ms; matrix size, 192 × 256; section thickness, 1 mm; sections per slab, 192; flip angle, 15°; NEX, 1; bandwidth, 150 Hz/pixel), an axial FLAIR image (TR, 9420 ms; TE, 141 ms; TI, 2500 ms; section thickness, 3 mm; number of sections, 60; flip angle, 170°; NEX, 1; bandwidth, 287 Hz/pixel), and an axial T2-weighted image (TR, 2260 ms; TE, 91ms; section thickness, 3 mm; number of sections, 60). Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetization–prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo images were acquired after administration of a standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadodiamide contrast agent (Omniscan; GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway).
Perfusion-Weighted Imaging
Dynamic susceptibility contrast–PWI was performed 5 minutes after a 3-mL preloading dose of intravenous gadodiamide contrast agent. The preloading injection was performed to reduce the effect of contrast leakage. For PWI, T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI was performed during the first pass of a standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg, 5 mL/s) of intravenous contrast agent.18 FLAIR images were used to plan twenty 3-mm-thick axial sections covering the neoplasm (field of view, 22 × 22 cm2; matrix size, 128 × 128; in-plane resolution, 1.72 × 1.72 × 3 mm3; TR, 2000 ms; TE, 45 ms; bandwidth, 1346 Hz/pixel; flip angle, 90°; EPI factor, 128; echo spacing, 0.83). Forty-five sequential measurements were acquired for each section, with a temporal resolution of 2.1 s.
Proton MR Spectroscopy
We performed single-section 2D multi-voxel 1H-MRS by using a point-resolved spectroscopy sequence after acquisition of PWI and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Sequence parameters included a TR of 1700 ms; TE, 30 ms; NEX, 3; field of view, 16 × 16 cm2–20 × 20 cm2; section thickness, 15–20 mm; bandwidth, 1200 Hz; matrix size, 16 × 16; and vector size, 1024. The size of the 1H-MRS voxel varied from 10 × 10 × 15 mm3 (volume, 1.5 cm3) to 10 × 12.5 × 20 mm3 (volume, 2.5 cm3), depending on the dimensions of the neoplasm. The VOI was selected based on FLAIR images to include the largest cross-section of neoplasm and contralateral normal brain parenchyma in the same plane. Areas of scalp, skull base, and sinuses were avoided in the selection of the VOI. In addition, 8 outer volume saturation slabs (30-mm thick) were placed outside of the VOI to suppress lipid signals from the bone and scalp. The dataset was acquired by use of elliptic k-space sampling with weighted-phase encoding to reduce the acquisition time. Manual shimming was performed to achieve an optimal value of full width at half maximum of the water signal. In all cases, a shimming of <20 Hz was achieved on the magnitude signal of the water resonance. Both water-suppressed and unsuppressed 1H-MRS spectra were acquired, and the unsuppressed water signal was used to compute metabolite concentrations.
Data Analysis
We constructed CBV maps on a Leonardo workstation (Siemens, Erlangen Germany) using a PWI task card (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts), as described previously.19 We initially overlaid 1H-MR spectroscopy VOI on the FLAIR images to select the voxels of interest encompassing the hyperintense abnormality on a Leonardo workstation by using the syngo software (Siemens). The 1H-MR spectroscopy VOI was then overlaid on the CBV maps to coregister the CBV maps and 1H-MR spectroscopy VOI. This method allowed us to sample CBV values only from the regions that corresponded to the 1H-MR spectroscopy voxels. We obtained CBV values by drawing regions of interest from each selected voxel based on the FLAIR image hyperintensity in each neoplasm. The size of the regions of interest was similar to the 1H-MR spectroscopy voxel dimensions. The regions of interest were drawn by the primary author, who has more than 10 years of experience with clinical spectroscopy, and verified by an experienced neuroradiologist (>10 years of experience). Care was taken to avoid the cerebral blood vessels and hemorrhagic and cystic regions. CBV values were normalized with respect to contralateral normal-appearing white matter.
All 1H-MR spectroscopy data were analyzed by using a user-independent spectral fit program (LCModel; Stephen Provencher, Oakville, Ontario, Canada).20 The following metabolites were evaluated: NAA, Cr, Cho, Glx, and myo-inositol. The resonance at 1.3 ppm was assigned to a combination of lactate and lipid and metabolites with Cramer-Rao lower bounds greater than 20% SD were excluded.20 Metabolite concentrations were normalized with respect to the ipsilateral Cr for each voxel.
Because a region with rCBVmax is generally thought to reflect tumor aggressiveness,21 NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr, and lipid + lactate/Cr ratios were computed from the voxel that also exhibited the rCBVmax value from the tumor region that was encompassed within the VOI of 1H-MR spectroscopy.
As conventional MR imaging parameters have also been used for genotyping of oligodendrogliomas,22,23 the following imaging characteristics were also evaluated qualitatively: 1) sharp vs indistinct tumor border on T2-weighted images, 2) homogeneous vs heterogeneous tumor signal intensity on T2-weighted and T1-weighted images, 3) presence or absence of a paramagnetic susceptibility effect on T2-weighted and T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI images, and 4) presence or absence of contrast enhancement.
Statistical Analysis
Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to determine data distributions. As the data did not depart from Gaussian distribution, independent-sample t tests were performed to look for differences in rCBVmax and metabolite ratios between the 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the significant independent predictor and to evaluate the association between rCBVmax values and metabolite ratios to ascertain the best model to distinguish the 2 genotypes. To estimate the goodness of fit of the best logistic regression model, we performed the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. A P value was computed from the χ2 distribution with 8 df to test the fit of the logistic model. If the P value was >.05, the model fit was considered acceptable. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were also used to ascertain the accuracy of the discriminatory models, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve at a 95% confidence interval determined the accuracy. A Bonferroni correction was applied for analysis of the multivariate data involving 6 parameters (rCBVmax, NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr, and lipid + lactate/Cr). To evaluate the robustness of multivariate logistic regression models, we also applied leave-one-out cross-validation tests.
Fisher exact χ2 tests were performed to evaluate the conventional MR imaging characteristics in distinguishing the 2 groups. All data analyses were performed with a statistical tool (SPSS for Windows, version 15.0; SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).
Results
Representative images displaying the 1H-MR spectroscopy voxel corresponding to the rCBVmax region and spectra from patients with oligodendrogliomas harboring 1p/19q LOH and intact alleles are presented in Figs 1 and 2, respectively. rCBVmax values and metabolite ratios between 2 genotypes of oligodendrogliomas are shown as box-and-whisker plots in Fig 3. Significant differences in Cho/Cr (P = .046) between oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH and intact alleles were observed by use of the independent-sample t test. No significant differences in rCBVmax values and other 1H-MRS indices were observed between the 2 groups (P > .05).
Fig 1.
A 54-year-old woman with 1p/19q LOH oligodendroglioma. Axial FLAIR image (A) demonstrates an ill-defined hyperintense mass in the right parieto-occipital region extending into the lateral ventricles. There is heterogeneous contrast enhancement within the mass on the corresponding postcontrast T1-weighted image (B).1H-MRS grid overlaid on CBV map (C) demonstrating a voxel from the rCBVmax region (black). Corresponding spectrum (D) from this voxel shows lipid + lactate, NAA, Glx, Cr, Cho, and myo-inositol peaks.
Fig 2.
A 49-year-old woman diagnosed with oligodendroglioma with intact alleles. Axial FLAIR image (A) demonstrates an extensive hyperintense mass in the left frontal lobe extending into the genu of the corpus callosum and lateral ventricles. There is a small nodular focus of enhancement within the mass on the corresponding postcontrast T1-weighted image (B). 1H-MRS grid overlaid on the CBV map (C) demonstrating a voxel from the rCBVmax region (black). Corresponding spectrum (D) displaying various metabolite resonances. Note the presence of a reduced Cho/Cr ratio from rCBVmax voxel compared with that seen in Fig 1.
Fig 3.
Box-and-whisker plots demonstrating the range of distribution of metabolite ratios from a voxel with rCBVmax in patients with 1p/19q LOH (shaded) and intact alleles (white). Boxes represent the median, the 25th percentile, and the 75th percentile. Outlying values are marked with open circles. Cho/Cr was significantly different between the 2 genotypes of oligodendrogliomas.
When univariate logistic regression models were used to classify the genotypes, no single variable demonstrated significant contribution. However, among all of the variables tested in the univariate logistic regression model, the Cho/Cr ratio had the best predictive value. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68) of the Cho/Cr ratio (cutoff value, 0.41), with a sensitivity of 69.6% and a specificity of 64.2% (Fig 4). Among all bivariate logistic regression models, the Cho/Cr ratio, together with the rCBVmax value, provided the best discriminatory classification with an accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69), a sensitivity of 69.7%, and a specificity of 70.6% (Fig 4). Accuracies for the bivariate models involving rCBVmax and other metabolite ratios (NAA/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr, Glx/Cr, and lipid + lactate/Cr) were inferior to that of a model involving rCBVmax and Cho/Cr (data not shown). It is interesting to note that after incorporation of all of the metabolite ratios (NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Glx/Cr, myo-inositol/Cr, and lipid + lactate/Cr) and the CBVmax value in the multivariate logistic regression model, a significant improvement in the performance of the model was observed (P = .018). A higher discriminative accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.72), sensitivity (82.6%), and moderate specificity (64.7%) were observed in distinguishing 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas (Fig 4). A χ2 value of 8.04 and a P value of .429 were obtained from the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, reflecting an acceptable fit for the multivariate logistic regression model. Leave-one-out cross-validation tests revealed that 70% of oligodendrogliomas were correctly classified into 1p/19q LOH and intact alleles by the multivariate logistic regression model.
Fig 4.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for Cho/Cr ratio measured from rCBVmax voxel exhibit an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.68 (broken line). The Cho/Cr ratio, together with the rCBVmax from the bivariate logistic regression analysis, shows an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.69 (dotted line). After incorporation of all of the metabolite ratios and rCBVmax value in the multivariate logistic regression model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.72 (solid line). The multivariate logistic regression analysis provided the best model to distinguish the 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas, with a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 64.7%. Leave-one-out cross-validation tests revealed that 70% of oligodendrogliomas were correctly classified.
Conventional MR Imaging Characteristics
Paramagnetic susceptibility effect was higher in patients with 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas compared with those with intact alleles (P = .04). Of the 23 patients with 1p/19q LOH, 18 patients demonstrated a susceptibility effect, whereas only 8 of 17 patients with intact alleles had a susceptibility effect. In addition, more patients with 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas (n = 19/23) had an indistinct border on T2-weighted images than those with intact alleles (n = 12/17), with a trend toward significance (P = .07). However, contrast enhancement and signal intensity on T2- and T1-weighted images did not differ between the 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas (P > .05).
Discussion
Our study demonstrates that the integration of rCBVmax and 1H-MRS indices may aid in the discrimination of oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH from those with intact alleles. The prevalence of 1p/19q LOH in oligodendrogliomas is 50%–80%, which is consistent with a 60%–70% response rate to procarbazine, vincristine, lomustine (PCV),24 whereas 50%–60% of patients respond to temozolomide.25 Although most anaplastic oligodendrogliomas are chemosensitive, the responsiveness of low-grade oligodendrogliomas and the most appropriate timing for therapy are unclear and debatable.26–28 On the contrary, some studies8,9 have demonstrated that oligodendrogliomas harboring 1p/19q LOH, irrespective of histologic grade, present a favorable outcome to PCV chemotherapy, thus corroborating the need for a genetic profile to guide clinical management in such patients.
Previous studies have reported that both dynamic susceptibility contrast–PWI and arterial spin-labeling PWI can distinguish histologic grades of gliomas.29,30 However, PWI had limited usefulness in the differentiation of subgroups of oligodendrogliomas with considerable overlap in rCBVmax and maximal cerebral blood flow between low and high grades.21,29,31 One study reported specific genotypic differences in oligodendrogliomas by use of dynamic susceptibility contrast–PWI,11 with significantly higher rCBVmax in only low-grade oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH.11 Although the precise mechanism for increased rCBVmax is unknown, it is believed that oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH are associated with increased metabolism, angiogenesis, and an intense vascular network. In a recent study, Kapoor et al12 reported significantly higher rCBVmax in low-grade oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH and increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression, CD31, and CD105, independent of epidermal growth factor receptor subtype, compared with tumors with intact alleles. In addition, significant associations between rCBVmax with 1p/19q LOH, and epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression were also reported in that study. Despite promising rCBV differences among genetically different low-grade oligodendrogliomas, previous studies11,12 did not observe a significant difference in rCBVmax between 2 genotypes among high-grade oligodendrogliomas. These studies exemplify the limitation of rCBV alone because a priori knowledge of WHO grading (via biopsy or surgical samples) would defeat the purpose of a noninvasive diagnostic imaging technique. Therefore, it is essential to explore the usefulness of other imaging biomarkers or a combination of biomarkers that can identify oligodendroglial genotypes before commencement of any treatment.
Numerous studies have shown the potential of 1H-MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of tumor grade15,32 and differentiation of tumor types.33,34 Recently, 1H-MR spectroscopy has also shown promise in determining the genotype profile of brain tumors.35 Nafe et al36 reported a significant correlation between Cho/Cr and the degree of epidermal growth factor receptor in astrocytic tumors, suggesting that molecular analysis by 1H-MR spectroscopy may provide better characterization of brain tumors. Jenkinson et al10 observed a nonsignificant, but higher Cho/Cr ratio in oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH compared with patients with intact alleles. Given the heterogeneous nature of the neoplasm, it is possible that metabolite levels from a large single voxel (used in that study) might have included multiple tissue compartments because of partial volume averaging. This belief is also supported by a considerable overlap of 1H-MR spectroscopy indices between 2 grades of oligodendrogliomas.37 To address the tumor heterogeneity, Chawla et al16 used cerebral blood flow–guided analysis of 1H-MR spectroscopy and observed significantly higher Cho/Cr and lipid + lactate/Cr from high-grade oligodendrogliomas compared with low-grade oligodendrogliomas.
Because the rCBVmax region corresponds to greatest malignancy,21 we evaluated the Cho/Cr ratios from the voxel with the rCBVmax region and observed significantly different ratios between the 2 genotypes of oligodendrogliomas. However, no significant contribution of any single variable was observed in the univariate logistic regression models in distinguishing the 2 genotypes. This may be the result of tumor heterogeneity, which is prevalent in oligodendrogliomas. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first that explores the usefulness of combining PWI-directed 1H-MR spectroscopy and PWI to distinguish 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas from those with intact alleles. Because we focus on areas of high perfusion only, we believe that the differences (though small, but significant) are real and are not related to intratumoral heterogeneity. As ours is a single-institution study on a limited number of patients, future studies on larger cohorts may be necessary to evaluate the true clinical potential of our work.
When rCBVmax and Cho/Cr values were incorporated in a bivariate logistic regression analysis, a moderate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was observed. However, incorporating rCBVmax value and corresponding 1H-MRS indices as interaction components in a multivariate regression analysis provided the best accuracy. A relatively high sensitivity of 82.6% for this model indicates a high positive rate in discriminating the 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas. Given the inherently different physiologic and biochemical information that rCBVmax and 1H-MRS indices provide, we believe that these parameters may be complementary in tumor diagnosis. Multiparametric data analysis allows us to exploit the unique strengths of the different imaging techniques. As a combination of PWI and 1H-MR spectroscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy of gliomas,38 we used a similar approach to obtain greater discrimination of genotypes of oligodendrogliomas and showed that it was more sensitive than any single PWI/1H-MR spectroscopy parameter.
Cho-containing compounds (choline, phosphocholine, and glycerophosphocholine) are part of the normal phospholipid pathways that maintain cell membrane integrity. Higher Cho levels in tumors indicate increased membrane turnover because of cell proliferation or high cell density.39 Tumor vasculature plays a critical role in supplying nutrients and oxygen to cancer cells, providing a favorable environment for the cells to grow. This argument is supported by the fact that high rCBV correlates with increased Cho levels in gliomas.40 Histopathologic analysis shows that oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH grow as compact and hypercellular lesions,41 corroborating our observation of elevated levels of Cho/Cr in these oligodendrogliomas. Higher proliferation of neoplastic cells and elevated metabolic rate lead to hypoxic regions; this cycle ultimately leads to energy failure and cell death that results in necrosis. We believe that elevated levels of lipid and lactate in the 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas in our study is possibly attributed to a combined process of hypoxia, microscopic cellular necrosis, and cell proliferation in rCBVmax regions of the neoplams. Both myo-inositol and Glx play important roles in the growth of oligodendrogliomas through multiple mechanisms.33,42 We believe that increased mitotic activity of neoplastic cells in the rCBVmax regions of 1p/19q LOH oligodendrogliomas may account for the increased myo-inositol and Glx levels.
Some studies22,23 have assessed the relationship between conventional MR imaging and genotypes of oligodendrogliomas. An indistinct tumor border, heterogeneous signal intensity, and paramagnetic susceptibility are associated with oligodendrogliomas harboring 1p/19q LOH.22,23 We observed a significantly higher susceptibility effect in oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q deletions. Calcification and tumor-associated hemorrhage are commonly seen in oligodendrogliomas,43 which may have contributed to the susceptibility effect in our study.
Previous studies22,23 have also reported that oligodendrogliomas harboring 1p/19q loss usually demonstrate an indistinct border, whereas a sharp border is a characteristic of those with intact 1p/19q alleles. We also observed an indistinct border more frequently in oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH compared with intact alleles; however, the difference was not significant. Furthermore, unlike previous reports,22 no significant difference in signal intensity of T2- and T1-weighted images was observed in our study between 2 groups of oligodendrogliomas. As morphologic imaging characteristics are usually evaluated qualitatively and are observer-dependent, assessment of imaging features is subjective and may have considerable user bias. We believe that the discrepancy between our results and those published in the literature may be attributed to observer variability in assessing these imaging characteristics. These observations further imply that evaluation of conventional imaging features alone may not be a reliable approach in distinguishing genotypes of oligodendrogliomas. On the contrary, techniques such as PWI and 1H-MR spectroscopy are physiologically sensitive and quantitative and consequently may be more reliable.
Our study was limited by the relatively small sample size, as we had to exclude 10 patients because of unavailability of a cytogenetic profile and suboptimal PWI or 1H-MRS data. The second limitation of our study was a certain degree of heterogeneity in our patient population, as we also included patients with oligoastrocytomas. In general, oligoastrocytomas exhibit p53 deletions and 17p LOH that are associated with astrocytic biologic behavior. However, allelic loss on chromosomes 1p and 19q is also exhibited by oligoastrocytomas, suggesting a monoclonal origin of oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. Similar to pure oligodendrogliomas, patients with oligoastrocytomas also exhibit favorable prognosis and clinical response to chemoradiation therapy.7 On the basis of similarities in genetic aberrations and clinical features, oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas are often grouped together as oligodendroglial tumors; thus, their inclusion in the current study is justifiable.
Another limitation of our study was limited tissue coverage, as we used a single-section 1H-MRS to coregister rCBV maps; thus, only a part of the tumor was analyzed. To cover the whole neoplasm, or at least the bulk of the tumor volume, it is desirable to use a 3D 1H-MRS sequence. However, such techniques lead to increased acquisition time that could be prohibitive in routine clinical settings. Parallel MRS with sensitivity encoding or generalized autocalibrated partially parallel acquisitions or echo-planar spectroscopic imaging techniques can overcome this problem.
Leakage of the gadolinium-based contrast agents in neoplastic lesions from the vascular compartment to the interstitial space may lead to underestimation of rCBV values.44,45 To account for this error, a preloading dose of contrast agent was administered 3 minutes before the contrast bolus to acquire PWI data as has been reported previously.18,46 Although largely successful, the resulting signal might still be contaminated by a T1effect that can be accounted for by mathematical modeling. Although we did not perform such corrections, we believe that this potential error would cancel out because the assumed underestimation of CBV would have affected both of the patient groups.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates that integration of 1H-MRS indices from the rCBVmax voxel may be helpful in distinguishing oligodendrogliomas with 1p/19q LOH from those with intact alleles. However, further studies in a larger patient population are required to confirm our findings.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- Glx
glutamate+glutamine
- LOH
loss of heterozygosity
- rCBV
relative cerebral blood volume
- rCBVmax
maximum rCBV
- WHO
World Health Organization
Footnotes
Disclosures: Jaroslaw Krejza—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Neuroradiology Journal, Comments: Editor-in-Chief. Donald O'Rourke—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Merrill-Lynch, Comments: company review (biotechnology), unrelated to this manuscript; Expert Testimony: Medico-legal consultancy, Comments: clinical activity expert review only, no research; Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health,* Celldex Therapeutics;* Patents (planned, pending, or issued): Trustee: University of Pennsylvania,* Comments: US and Europe approved patent: Methods and Compositions for Treating Tumors (ErbB inhibition and Radiotherapy for Cancer); Royalties: see above patent.* Harish Poptani—UNRELATED: Consultancy: American College of Radiology Image Metrix, Comments: consultant for a liver spectroscopy project, which is not relevant to this study; Grants/Grants Pending: National Institutes of Health.* (*Money paid to institution.)
REFERENCES
- 1. Engelhard HH, Stelea A, Cochran EJ. Oligodendroglioma: pathology and molecular biology. Surg Neurol 2002;58:111–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kleihues P, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, et al. The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002;61:215–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bromberg JE, van den Bent MJ. Oligodendrogliomas: molecular biology and treatment. Oncologist 2009;14:155–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bigner SH, Rasheed BK, Wiltshire R, et al. Morphologic and molecular genetic aspects of oligodendroglial neoplasms. Neuro Oncol 1999;1:52–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Aldape K, Burger PC, Perry A. Clinicopathologic aspects of 1p/19q loss and the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:242–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hartmann C, von Deimling A. Molecular pathology of oligodendroglial tumors. Recent results. Cancer Res 2009;171:25–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cairncross JG, Ueki K, Zlatescu MC, et al. Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1473–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Iwamoto FM, Nicolardi L, Demopoulos A, et al. Clinical relevance of 1p and 19q deletion for patients with WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. J Neurooncol 2008;88:293–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Walker C, Haylock B, Husband D, et al. Clinical use of genotype to predict chemosensitivity in oligodendroglial tumors. Neurology 2006;66:1661–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jenkinson MD, Smith TS, Joyce K, et al. MRS of oligodendroglial tumors: correlation with histopathology and genetic subtypes. Neurology 2005;64:2085–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Whitmore RG, Krejza J, Kapoor GS, et al. Prediction of oligodendroglial tumor subtype and grade using perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2007;107:600–09 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kapoor GS, Gocke TA, Chawla S, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging defines angiogenic subtypes of oligodendroglioma according to 1p19q and EGFR status. J Neurooncol 2009;92:373–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Spampinato MV, Smith JK, Kwock L, et al. Cerebral blood volume measurements and proton MR spectroscopy in grading of oligodendroglial tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:204–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Daumas-Duport C, Tucker ML, Kolles H, et al. Oligodendrogliomas. Part II: A new grading system based on morphological and imaging criteria. J Neurooncol 1997;34:61–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989–98 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chawla S, Wang S, Wolf RL, et al. Arterial spin-labeling and MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1683–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hatanpaa KJ, Burger PC, Eshleman JR, et al. Molecular diagnosis of oligodendroglioma in paraffin sections. Lab Invest 2003;83:419–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Morita N, Wang S, Chawla S, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging in grading of nonenhancing astrocytomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:803–08 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2002;223:11–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Provencher SW. Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed 2001;14:260–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW, et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:214–21 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Megyesi JF, Kachur E, Lee DH, et al. Imaging correlates of molecular signatures in oligodendrogliomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:4303–06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jenkinson MD, du Plessis DG, Smith TS, et al. Histological growth patterns and genotype in oligodendroglial tumours: correlation with MRI features. Brain 2006;129:1884–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cairncross JG, Macdonald DR. Successful chemotherapy for recurrent malignant oligodendroglioma. Ann Neurol 1988;23:360–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Brandes AA, et al. Phase II study of first-line chemotherapy with temozolomide in recurrent oligodendroglial tumors: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group Study 26971. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2525–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Engelhard HH, Stelea A, Mundt A. Oligodendroglioma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma: clinical features, treatment, and prognosis. Surg Neurol 2003;60:443–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. van den Bent MJ. Can chemotherapy replace radiotherapy in low-grade gliomas? Time for randomized studies. Semin Oncol 2003;30(6 Suppl 19):39–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Iwadate Y, Matsutani T, Hasegawa Y, et al. Favorable long-term outcome of low-grade oligodendrogliomas irrespective of 1p/19q status when treated without radiotherapy. J Neurooncol 2011;102:443–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wolf RL, Wang J, Wang S, et al. Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:475–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Di Costanzo A, Pollice S, Trojsi F, et al. Role of perfusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla in the assessment of malignancy of cerebral gliomas. Radiol Med 2008;113:134–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Xu M, See SJ, Ng WH, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and perfusion-weighted imaging in presurgical grading of oligodendroglial tumors. Neurosurgery 2005;56:919–26 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hsu YY, Chang CN, Wie KJ, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of cerebral gliomas: correlation of metabolite ratios with histopathologic grading. Chang Gung Med J 2004;27:399–407 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chawla S, Oleaga L, Wang S, et al. Role of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating oligodendrogliomas from astrocytomas. J Neuroimaging 2010;20:3–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Chawla S, Zhang Y, Wang S, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating glioblastomas from primary cerebral lymphomas and brain metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:836–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Thorsen F, Jirak D, Wang J, et al. Two distinct tumor phenotypes isolated from glioblastomas show different MRS characteristics. NMR Biomed 2008;21:830–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nafe R, Glienke W, Hattingen E, et al. Correlation between amplification of the gene for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), data from preoperative proton-MR-spectroscopy (1HMRS) and histomorphometric data of glioblastomas. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2007;29:199–207 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tate AR, Majos C, Moreno A, et al. Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: a multicenter study. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:29–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Di Costanzo A, Scarabino T, Trojsi F, et al. Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy. Neuroradiology 2006;48:622–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Miller BL. A review of chemical issues in 1H NMR spectroscopy: N-acetyl-L-aspartate, creatine and choline. NMR Biomed 1991;4:47–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Henry RG, Vigneron DB, Fischbein NJ, et al. Comparison of relative cerebral blood volume and proton spectroscopy in patients with treated gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:357–66 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Palfi S, Swanson KR, De Bouard S, et al. Correlation of in vitro infiltration with glioma histological type in organotypic brain slices. Br J Cancer 2004;91:745–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. de Groot J, Sontheimer H. Glutamate and the biology of gliomas. Glia 2011;59:1181–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lee YY, Van Tassel P. Intracranial oligodendrogliomas: imaging findings in 35 untreated cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:361–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Schmainda KM, Rand SD, Joseph AM, et al. Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1524–32 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Quarles CC, Ward BD, Schmainda KM. Improving the reliability of obtaining tumor hemodynamic parameters in the presence of contrast agent extravasation. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1307–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Donahue KM, Krouwer HG, Rand SD, et al. Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:845–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]