Abstract
Background
As cancer cachexia (CC) is associated with cancer progression, early identification would be beneficial. The aim of this study was to establish a workflow for automated MRI-based segmentation of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) and lean tissue water (LTW) in a B16 melanoma animal model, monitor diseases progression and transfer the protocol to human melanoma patients for therapy assessment.
Methods
For in vivo monitoring of CC B16 melanoma-bearing and healthy mice underwent longitudinal three-point DIXON MRI (days 3, 12, 17 after subcutaneous tumor inoculation). In a prospective clinical study, 18 metastatic melanoma patients underwent MRI before, 2 and 12 weeks after onset of checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT; n = 16). We employed an in-house MATLAB script for automated whole-body segmentation for detection of VAT, SCAT and LTW.
Results
B16 mice exhibited a CC phenotype and developed a reduced VAT volume compared to baseline (B16 − 249.8 µl, − 25%; controls + 85.3 µl, + 10%, p = 0.003) and to healthy controls. LTW was increased in controls compared to melanoma mice. Five melanoma patients responded to CIT, 7 progressed, and 6 displayed a mixed response. Responding patients exhibited a very limited variability in VAT and SCAT in contrast to others. Interestingly, the LTW was decreased in CIT responding patients (− 3.02% ± 2.67%; p = 0.0034) but increased in patients with progressive disease (+ 1.97% ± 2.19%) and mixed response (+ 4.59% ± 3.71%).
Conclusion
MRI-based segmentation of fat and water contents adds essential additional information for monitoring the development of CC in mice and metastatic melanoma patients during CIT or other treatment approaches.
Keywords: Melanoma, Cancer cachexia, MRI, Segmentation, Therapy monitoring, Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Introduction
Cancer cachexia (CC) as an epiphenomenon associated with cancer and other chronic diseases is defined by an involuntary loss of muscle and fat mass [1]. It can be associated with a variety of diseases, such as chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and cancer. In the latter case, CC is one of the major causes of death of tumor patients.
While several factors have been proposed to influence the development of CC, the main drivers leading to this phenomenon are still poorly understood. In fact, even within the same cancer entity, a broad variation in the presence or absence of CC is reported. Among the main drivers, brown adipose tissue (BAT) [2] and inflammatory factors, such as interleukins, have been discussed [3–6] and recent advances in research have identified novel protein functions [7] and some hormones, e.g., PTHrP [8], as potential factors.
Our understanding of the mechanisms of CC that lead to reduced quality of life and mechanisms of resilience in tumor patients and possible interventions is increasing [9–12]. Thus, the challenge for the treating oncologist is not only the cancer treatment as such, but also to identify patients at risk for developing CC, as the initial changes might be subclinical, especially in an increasingly obese society. A consensus definition has outlined three stages of CC, with a refractory cachectic stage in which failure of all interventional attempts leads to further weight loss and morbidity, independent of the accompanying cancer treatment [1, 4].
Imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are routinely used for cancer staging in oncology. Such examinations mainly focus on the detection of the primary tumor and metastases and their changes in response to therapy. However, recently, additional quantitative methods have been developed that use more of the information at hand, such as the segmentation and mass of muscle and adipose tissue [13–17]. As this information can be extracted from whole-body staging examinations, automated analysis would provide valuable information for the treating physician.
Recent large-scale studies of breast cancer patients found prognostic value in the presence of clinically non-evident muscle wasting detected with routine CT scans for staging, even in nonmetastatic patients and in a setting of changes of subcutaneous adipose tissue [18, 19]. Other studies have investigated the prognostic value of body composition in association with metabolic risk factor profiles or adipokine levels, and found it added value to clinical decision making and showed a prognostic impact [20–22]. Thus, imaging appears to be able to contribute predictive information that might not otherwise be accessible. However, none of these studies investigated the possible contribution of longitudinal monitoring of changes of body composition under checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CIT).
To better understand the development of CC, several mouse models have been described over the last few decades to study the phenomenon observed in humans. While spontaneously developing cancer models most closely resemble human carcinogenesis and its associated changes in metabolism and immune function, they are difficult to monitor noninvasively in terms of their cachectic stage. While inferior in terms of their comparability with human physiology, subcutaneous exogenous tumor models have the advantages of comparable tumor growth rates and weight loss within a cohort. The B16 melanoma model has been extensively studied in the past few decades and is a widely used experimental model to study CC [23, 24]. Exogenous B16 melanomas will grow in immunocompetent C57BL/6 J mice, which seems to be an essential factor with regard to the suggested role of immunological factors in CC development.
In a recent study, we noninvasively investigated changes in glucose metabolism in vivo (employing multimodal 18F-FDG-PET/CT or PET/MRI) in primary and secondary lymphatic organs of immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated experimental mice as well as metastatic melanoma patients and identified differential signatures enabling us to differentiate between responders and nonresponders [25].
In this study, we aimed to establish a workflow for automated MRI-based segmentation of subcutaneous, visceral adipose tissue and lean body mass that is applicable for both preclinical CC studies in rodents and in metastatic cancer patients. This should allow for early identification of CC and monitoring of the progression of CC as well as monitoring body adipose tissue and water composition changes in cases of successful treatment or treatment failure for therapeutic regimes, such as CIT.
Methods
All animal experiments were performed according to the German Animal Protection Law with permission from the local authorities (Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, Germany). The prospective human study was approved by the appropriate local ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Preclinical study
Animals
In this study, we used 8- to 10-week-old female C57BL/6 J mice (Charles River Laboratories, Sulzfeld, Germany). The mice were kept under standardized conditions in isolated ventilated cages (20 ± 1 °C room temperature, 50 ± 10% relative humidity, and a 12 h light–dark cycle) with free access to a standard diet for rodents (fed ad libitum) and tap water.
Cell culture
B16-F10 melanoma tumor cells (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, United States) were cultured in RPMI 1640, with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin and 10% fetal calf serum (all from Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in a cell culture cabinet (HeraSafe KS18, Thermo/Kendro, Dreieich/Hanau, Germany).
Experimental B16 melanoma model
To induce CC in the mice, 0.5 × 106 B16 melanoma tumor cells (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, United States) were injected subcutaneously into the lateral abdomen and the progression of CC was monitored by weight loss. The animals were weighed daily to monitor disease progression. For weight comparison to the control group, the tumor weight was identified after the last measurement by removing it and weighing it, and subtracting its weight from the final whole body weight.
In vivo MR studies
C57BL/6 J mice underwent MR measurements in a 7 T small animal MRI scanner (Clinscan, Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) 3, 12 and 17 days after tumor inoculation. Animals were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane (CP-Pharma, Burgdorf, Germany) evaporated in oxygen at a flow rate of 0.5 L/min. Body temperature was measured continuously and regulated by a warming pad, and anesthesia depths were monitored by breathing frequency. The following scan parameters were used: whole-body imaging was performed using a 2D gradient echo sequence with 3 echoes (1.26, 1.6, 1.94 ms) and the following parameters: slice thickness 2 mm, matrix 162 × 192; FOV 38 × 45; repetition time 450 ms, flip angle 20°. Decomposition of fat and water images from the acquired MR data was performed using in-house software (implemented in MATLAB, version 2014b) based on a method previously described by Berglund et al. [26]. Subsequently, separation of VAT, SCAT and LTW was performed using in-house software based on active contour segmentation (implemented in MATLAB, version 2014b) as previously described in [27] and outlined below. For the analysis, the subcutaneous tumor was excluded.
Blood samples
After the last MRI scan, 17 days after tumor inoculation, the mice were sacrificed and blood samples were prepared, centrifuged and frozen at – 80 °C before analysis of cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triacylglycerols (TAG) and total protein was carried out using an automated clinical chemistry analyzer ADVIA 1800 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Eschborn, Germany).
Prospective clinical study
Patient population
All participants gave written informed consent prior to entry into the study. Between 09/2014 and 10/2016, 18 patients with Stage IV melanoma were prospectively included before initiation of systemic immune therapy and their data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were examined at 3 time points: before treatment, and at 2 and 12 weeks after initiation of treatment. The patients were categorized by therapeutic response as responder, mixed responder or nonresponder in accordance with the clinical response evaluation.
MR study
All whole-body MR examinations were performed as part of a clinically indicated FDG-PET/MR staging examination on a combined 3 T PET/MR scanner (Siemens Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The study MR protocol consisted of a whole-body dual echo Dixon MR sequence in the axial orientation (skull base to mid-thigh level) with the following parameters: resolution 2.6 × 2.6 mm, slice thickness 3.1 mm, echo times 1.32, 2.46 ms, repetition time 3.96 ms, flip angle 9°. The data were processed as described above.
MR data analysis
In animal studies as well as patient examinations, adipose tissue compartments (subcutaneous (SCAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT)) as well as the lean tissue water compartment (LTW)) were automatically segmented on the fat images using an active contour-based approach as previously described by Wuerslin et al. [27]. In short, this method is based on the use of active contours (so-called snake algorithm) to detect the boundary between SCAT and the underlying musculature/fascia. The outer contour of the skin is thereby used as initial contour for the subsequent iterative inward-pointing propagation of the contour. The energy of the contour finds a local minimum at the border between SCAT and muscle tissue/fascia on fat images due to a sharp signal edge along this border. The algorithm was applied to each single 2D slice separately from the skull base to the mid-thigh level. Automated segmentation results were validated visually, and corrections of segmentations were performed where necessary. No specific adaptation of the algorithm was necessary for translation from human to animal data as the matrix size (and thus the step size of the snake algorithm) was comparable between human and animal data and as the fat/water contrast was also similar between human and animal data. This was determined empirically.
Statistics
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation. Changes in body weight, fat and water content are given in percentages. GraphPad Prism 7.03, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA was used for the statistical analysis. A normal distribution was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. For imaging data, measurements in follow-up examinations were expressed as percent change from baseline to correct for individual baseline values and used for statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA was used for group comparisons and p values were corrected for multiple testing with Bonferroni measures. Pearson’s r was used for correlation analysis. Unpaired Student’s t test was used for two-group comparisons and for parameters from the blood sampling, and values < 0.05 were considered significant. Graphs were produced with MATLAB 9.5 R2018b (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts) and GraphPad Prism 7.03.
Results
Determination of body composition and cachexia monitoring in the experimental B16 melanoma mouse model
A cachexia phenotype was confirmed by monitoring animal weight and characteristic changes in serum parameters. Seventeen days after tumor inoculation, the weight of the B16 melanoma-bearing animals (n = 7) was 18.7 ± 1.3 g compared to 20.3 ± 0.4 g in the healthy control group (n = 6, p = 0.04). Blood samples acquired at day 17 demonstrated a cachectic phenotype in the tumor-bearing animals with cholesterol levels of 79 ± 10 mg/dl compared to 101 ± 5 mg/dl in the control animals (p < 0.02). LDL-C in the cachexia mice (12 mg/dl) was increased threefold when compared to healthy control mice (4 mg/dl, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1a). In line with these data, we also found a significant increase in TAG in the tumor-bearing mice (88 ± 8 mg/dl) in comparison to the control mice (63.0 ± 3.4 mg/dl, p = 0.02, Fig. 1).
We conducted automated segmentation of VAT and SCAT, as well as LTW, of all experimental B16 melanoma-bearing and healthy control animals. An example of the segmentation is given in Fig. 2. B16 melanoma-bearing animals exhibited a volume of VAT at baseline (3 days after tumor inoculation) of 1000.1 ± 323.0 µl, while VAT in the control animals was 810.7 ± 111.6 µl (n.s.; Fig. 3a). After 12 days, VAT in the melanoma animals was reduced to 867.7 ± 285.1 µl (− 12% from baseline), while healthy controls showed a VAT volume of 841.9 ± 357.8 µl (+ 4% from baseline). After 17 days, VAT was reduced in the melanoma group by a mean of 249.8 µl (− 25% from baseline, n = 7; p = 0.003 to baseline), while in the healthy control animals, VAT increased with age (85.3 µl; + 10% from baseline, n = 6; p = 0.26 for the group comparison after 17 days, n.s.; Fig. 3a).
SCAT volume in the B16-bearing and healthy control animals was 429.6 ± 149.3 µl and 337.6 ± 93.3 µl, respectively, at baseline (n.s.). After 12 days, the SCAT volume in the melanoma mice was 416.1 ± 142.4 µl (− 2% from baseline) and 390.9 ± 197.7 µl in the healthy control mice (+ 15% from baseline, n.s.). After 17 days, the SCAT volume in the B16 melanoma mice was reduced to 388.2 ± 55.0 µl (− 16% from baseline) and to 372.7 ± 25.7 µl in the control animals (+ 10% from baseline, n.s.).
In addition, the lean tissue water volume changed from 12,934.5 ± 768.3 µl (at baseline) to 13,297.6 ± 503.9 µl (day 12) and to 13,063.0 ± 227.2 µl (day 17) in the B16-bearing animals and from 13,322.8 ± 369.1 µl to 13,893.3 ± 553.6 µl (day 12) and to 13,817.5 ± 115.7 µl (day 17) in the control animals (p = 0.049). Figure 3b, c gives examples of the MRI segmentation with delineation of VAT, SCAT and LTW in a B16 melanoma-bearing mouse (B) and a healthy control mouse (C).
Identification and monitoring of CC in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated patients with metastatic melanoma
In a prospective clinical study, eighteen patients (10 male and 8 female patients with a mean age of 62 ± 10 years) underwent MR scans at baseline (before therapy) and follow-up MR investigations after two weeks and 12 weeks after onset of PD-1- or CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (n = 16) or targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors (n = 2). In addition, we determined the patient weight and body mass index at baseline and in both follow-up examinations (Tables 1, 2). Automated segmentation of VAT, SCAT and LWT was feasible in all cases except for one patient due to a metallic hip prosthesis. In this case, the affected region was excluded for all three examinations.
Table 1.
Patient | BW at baseline [kg] | BW after 2 weeks [kg] | BW after 12 weeks [kg] | BMI at baseline [kg/m2] | BMI after 2 weeks [kg/m2] | BMI after 3 months [kg/m2] | VAT change from baseline (%) | SCAT change from baseline (%) | LTW change from baseline (%) | Therapy | Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 90.9 | 85.0 | 79.9 | 26.0 | 24.3 | 22.8 | − 44.83 | − 34.87 | − 1.31 | PD-1-mAb | PD |
2 | 96.2 | 100.3 | 100.8 | 32.5 | 33.9 | 34.1 | 4.86 | 0.26 | 1.11 | CTLA-4-mAb | PD |
3 | 85.7 | 85.9 | 89.3 | 31.5 | 31.6 | 32.8 | 0.32 | 4.04 | 8.59 | PD-1-mAb | MIXED |
4 | 57.2 | 57.5 | 54.7 | 22.3 | 22.5 | 21.4 | − 5.76 | − 3.78 | 1.65 | PD-1-mAb | PD |
5 | 82.6 | 82.0 | 80.6 | 27.9 | 27.7 | 27.2 | − 14.50 | − 7.48 | 1.76 | PD-1-mAb | MIXED |
6 | 84.5 | 85.0 | 86.7 | 26.1 | 26.2 | 26.8 | − 4.07 | − 2.48 | − 5.72 | CTLA-4-mAb | RTT |
7 | 67.4 | 66.0 | 66.4 | 24.8 | 24.2 | 24.4 | 1.96 | − 0.49 | − 4.13 | PD-1-mAb | RTT |
8 | 85.1 | 84.0 | 79.0 | 27.5 | 27.1 | 25.5 | − 38.13 | − 17.07 | 6.76 | PD-1-mAb | MIXED |
9 | 100.3 | 99.0 | 96.2 | 32.8 | 32.3 | 31.4 | − 6.44 | − 4.58 | − 0.31 | PD-1-mAb | MIXED |
10 | 93.1 | 92.1 | 92.9 | 28.1 | 27.8 | 28.0 | 1.88 | − 0.72 | 1.42 | PD-1-mAb | RTT |
11 | 71.3 | 72.0 | 70.0 | 25.0 | 25.2 | 24.5 | 12.96 | − 0.06 | 2.31 | BRAF | PD |
12 | 61.2 | 60.0 | 62.3 | 22.5 | 22.0 | 22.9 | − 3.50 | 2.69 | 4.80 | PD-1-mAb | PD |
13 | 65.7 | 68.3 | 67.3 | 21.2 | 22.0 | 21.7 | 16.67 | 13.85 | 1.54 | PD-1-mAb | PD |
14 | 85.3 | 86.2 | 86.5 | 24.4 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 1.96 | 1.25 | 3.04 | PD-1-mAb | RTT |
15 | 87.6 | 82.0 | 75.5 | 28.6 | 26.8 | 24.7 | − 13.86 | − 19.49 | − 14.67 | BRAF | MIXED |
16 | 112.5 | 110.0 | 113.0 | 32.5 | 31.8 | 32.7 | − 1.16 | − 8.36 | 4.00 | PD-1-mAb | PD |
17 | 82.2 | 83.0 | 83.3 | 25.4 | 25.6 | 25.7 | 7.17 | 4.89 | − 3.62 | PD-1-mAb | RTT |
18 | 53.6 | 55.7 | 55.1 | 20.0 | 20.7 | 20.5 | 17.13 | 7.42 | 6.15 | PD-1-mAb | MIXED |
The percent changes in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT) and lean tissue water (LTW) from baseline to the last measurement are given. The response assessment is given for the progressive disease (PD), mixed response to treatment (MIXED) and response to treatment (RTT) groups
Table 2.
Five patients were classified as immunotherapy responders after 12 weeks (RTT), six patients demonstrated a mixed response (MIXED), whereas seven patients showed progressive disease (PD, Table 1). BMI changed with a mean of + 0.73% ± 1.59% for patients with RTT, − 4.66% ± 6.89% for MIXED and + 0.55% ± 3.25% for patients with PD.
The change in body weight in percent from baseline to the examination after 12 weeks of therapy correlated well with the change in total fat (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001). No correlation was observed between the response to therapy and changes in BMI.
There were individual and overall differences in the composition and body fat changes, but no correlation was observed between changes in body weight and therapy response (responder: change from baseline mean 0.7% ± 1.6%, range − 1.5% and + 2.6%, nonresponder: − 1.3% ± 5.1%, range − 12.1% to + 4.8%).
LTW was increased in patients with a mixed response (+ 4.59% ± 3.71%) and progressive disease (+ 1.97% ± 2.19%) under CIT after 3 months compared to RTT (− 3.02% ± 2.67%, n = 16, F = 9.05, p = 0.0034; mean group difference for RTT vs. MIXED − 7.61 [95% CI − 12.4 to − 2.8] and for RTT vs. PD − 4.98 [95% CI − 9.6 to − 0.4], MIXED vs. PD n.s.).
Determination of VAT and SCAT revealed no significant differences among responders, mixed responders and nonresponders. However, while patients with a response to treatment showed a relatively narrow band of changes in VAT and SCAT after 12 weeks, the standard deviation and range of extreme changes increased with a less favorable response to treatment for both VAT and SCAT (Fig. 5c).
Figures 4 and 5a give a representative example of the MRI segmentation in a 64-year-old patient with rapidly progressive disease under CIT (nivolumab). The body weight of the patient was 85.1 kg at baseline. The follow-up examinations revealed a significant loss of the initial amount of total fat from 27,780 ml to 26,103 ml after 2 weeks (− 6%) and to 20,530 ml after 3 months (− 26%, Fig. 5a). In line with these data, body weight was reduced after two weeks to 84.0 kg (− 1.3%) and after 12 weeks to 79.0 kg (− 7.2% from baseline).
Conversely, Fig. 5b shows a representative patient with a response to treatment (complete remission) under CIT (nivolumab) with unaffected weight. The initial body weight was 93.1 kg and the total body fat volume was 38,347 ml. After two weeks, the patient exhibited an almost unaffected body weight of 92.1 kg (− 1.1%) and after 12 weeks of 92.9 kg (− 0.2% in total). Total body fat after two weeks of immunotherapy was 39,544 ml (+ 3.1%) and 38,664 ml after 12 weeks (+ 0.8% total).
Discussion
In this study, we used an automated workflow for MRI-based quantification of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and lean tissue water in mice and humans to noninvasively monitor changes in the development of CC in melanoma-bearing mice and to investigate changes in body composition in patients with metastasized melanoma under immune therapy. In both animals and metastatic melanoma patients, the quantification of visceral and subcutaneous fat was feasible.
The cachectic phenotype was confirmed in the mice by weight loss and serum parameters. While the effects of tumor induced cachexia on plasma lipids vary between different cancer types, both human and murine tumor cell lines lead to hyperlipidemia and can contribute to tumor growth [28].
The field of noninvasive fat-muscle quantification is of increasing interest. Starting from phantom studies [29], moving to feasibility studies in humans and animals [30, 31] and then to large-scale studies [32–34], multi-echo DIXON approaches have shown to be a robust and reliable method for fat and water quantification [35]. While DIXON techniques are part of many clinical examinations of the abdomen, segmentation of fat and body water is not performed routinely.
With the help of an automated segmentation script, body composition analysis was feasible for both human and murine subjects at different field strengths and with different scanner types. The equality of different fat segmentation strategies has recently been revisited [31, 36], making different approaches usable in broader clinical practice. Multi-point Dixon sequences have gained widespread use in clinical practice over the last years. While they show several advantages, such as the ability to adaptable echo times, more robust correction for magnetic field inhomogeneities or benefits in obese patients [35, 37, 38], we used the 2-point Dixon as this sequence is routinely implemented as part of a PET/MR protocol for the purpose of MR-based attenuation correction. The sequence is optimized for the scanner used in this study and robust against fat/water swaps. Furthermore, this sequence can be acquired in breath hold which is important for thoracic and abdominal acquisition. To reduce scan time, and as the 2-point Dixon segmentation was robust for the purpose at hand, we did not acquire an additional 3-point Dixon sequence. Most clinically oriented studies at hand focus on obesity-associated subjects [39], with predictive impacts for patient care. Rospleszcz et al. emphasized the need for longitudinal assessment in cardiometabolic risk estimation [22]. For tumor patients, recent studies with large cohorts of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients by Bradshaw and Caan [18, 19] demonstrated these image analysis methods added additional prognostic information in the detection of sarcopenia and adipose tissue distribution as these are not easily assessable clinically.
With the introduction of more immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapeutic regimens in clinical practice, the need for early therapeutic response assessment by imaging is of increasing importance. A series of studies with a focus on imaging in the context of CIT investigated side effects and induced autoimmune phenomena, such as pancreatitis and myositis [40, 41]. Recently, monitoring of systemic immune responses and prediction of long-term outcomes were demonstrated for 18F-FDG-PET/CT [42] in ipilimumab- and nivolumab-treated melanoma patients. Despite the ease of direct assessment of therapeutic success of viable tumor tissue or the detection of side effects, the analysis of concomitant effects in immune therapy remains elusive.
Indirect patterns of favorable or unfavorable tumor therapy-associated metabolic signs of treatment success or tumor therapy-associated adverse metabolic consequences are becoming even more relevant with the use of CTI. CC, as an independent factor impacting cancer patient survival, is a tumor- and therapy-associated risk that is not easily assessable with clinical examinations and blood parameters [4].
We have recently investigated metabolic epiphenomena in melanoma patients receiving CIT and found increased metabolic activity in the bone marrow of patients with a response to CTI compared to that in nonresponders [25]. Seeking additional auxiliary metabolic indications for therapeutic efficacy, the aim of this study was to investigate changes in VAT and SCAT as a profile of metabolic therapy response. Thus, we adjusted automated segmentation from whole-body MRI-data to create a robust workflow for human and murine use and to monitor melanoma-associated metabolic phenomena, namely cachexia development and metabolic changes during CIT therapy in advanced melanoma.
We were able to observe the progress of CC in B16 melanoma-bearing animals and demonstrate a mean reduction of 25% of total visceral adipose tissue volume after 17 days. Monitoring the changes in metastatic melanoma patients revealed limited changes with regard to BMI; however, as with VAT and SCAT, the variability seems to be increased when there is a more unfavorable outcome. Bradshaw and Caan [18, 19] saw increased mortality in patients with sarcopenia and increased SCAT in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients. It remains difficult to compare various cancer entities and different metastatic stages, especially as it is well known that sarcopenia and cachexia are very variable between different cancer entities [4].
In our study, LTW values were increased in patients with a mixed response and those with PD in comparison to patients with a response to treatment. This might be an indicator of anasarca, as CTI is associated with cardiotoxicity and heart failure [43], although ascites, heart failure, and other signs of cardiovascular toxicity were not documented in any of the patients.
A limitation of this study is the small number of patients. Melanoma patients were prospectively recruited and monitored for their responses to the therapeutic interventions, but the MRI examinations were analyzed in retrospect. Thus, patients were not matched for sex, baseline weight or other variables. The exposure to different environmental factors, exercise and food intake, among others, could interact with systemic reactions to CIT. This makes it difficult to correct for different body compositions at baseline, individual food intake, and lifestyle, as well as effects of the immunomodulatory therapy.
Conclusion
Noninvasive monitoring of the ancillary metabolic effects of tumor progression showed reduced amounts of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in a melanoma mouse model, as well as increased variation in adipose tissue in CIT-treated metastatic melanoma patients with progressive disease or mixed response. Interestingly, LTW significantly increased in metastatic melanoma patients with a mixed response and those with progressive disease, while no change or even a decrease was determined in patients with a response to CIT. Thus, the results of this study emphasize the importance of the monitoring of image-derived metabolic markers of body composition, especially as checkpoint inhibitor therapies become more widely used in clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sandro Aidone, Daniel Bukalla, Maren Harant and Natalie Mucha (preclinical imaging) and Carsten Groeper and Gerd Zeger for excellent technical support.
Abbreviations
- BAT
Brown adipose tissue
- BMI
Body mass index
- CC
Cancer cachexia
- CIT
Checkpoint inhibitor therapy
- CTLA-4
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4
- CT
Computed tomography
- LDL-C
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- LTW
Lean tissue water
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PD-1
Programmed death-1
- SCAT
Subcutaneous adipose tissue
- TAG
Triacylglycerols
- VAT
Visceral adipose tissue
Author contributions
Conceptualization, W.M.T., B.J.P., M.K.; methodology, W.M.T, S.G., J.M. T.S., A.P.; software, W.M.T., S.G., J.M., A.P.; validation, W.M.T., S.G., A.P., M.K.; formal analysis, W.M.T., S.G., M.K.; investigation, W.M.T., S.G., J.M., T.S., A.P.; resources, S.G., K.N., M.K., B.J.P., T.S., A.P.; data curation, W.M.T., S.G., A.P., M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M.T., M.K.; writing—review and editing, W.M.T., S.G., J.M. T.S., A.P., T.K.E., K.N., B.J.P., M.K.; visualization, W.M.T., S.G.; supervision, M.K., T.K.E., K.N., B.J.P.; project administration, W.M.T., M.K. B.J.P.; funding acquisition, W.M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. W.M.T. is supported by the intramural funding fortüne-Program of the Faculty of Medicine of the Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (PATE 2232-0-0). This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2180 – 390900677 and SFB685; project B6) and the Werner Siemens-Foundation (Zug, Switzerland).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
W.M.T. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. S.G. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. T.S. declares that she has no conflicts of interest. J.M. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. A.P. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. T.K.E. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. K.N. declares that he has no conflicts of interest. B.J.P. receives grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bruker, Oncodesign, Merck and Siemens; however, none of the grants are directly related to this work. M.K. declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants and animals
All animal experiments were performed according to the German Animal Protection Law with permission from the local authorities (Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, Germany). The clinical study was approved by the appropriate local ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants obtained an informed consent of the study prior to treatment. Informed consent included the written permission to use the tumor samples of the patients included in the study for research purposes.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489–495. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70218-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Petruzzelli M, Schweiger M, Schreiber R, Campos-Olivas R, Tsoli M, Allen J, Swarbrick M, Rose-John S, Rincon M, Robertson G, Zechner R, Wagner EF. A switch from white to brown fat increases energy expenditure in cancer-associated cachexia. Cell Metab. 2014;20(3):433–447. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bing C. Lipid mobilization in cachexia: mechanisms and mediators. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011;5(4):356–360. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32834bde0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(2):90–99. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suzuki H, Asakawa A, Amitani H, Nakamura N, Inui A. Cancer cachexia—pathophysiology and management. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(5):574–594. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0787-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ezeoke CC, Morley JE. Pathophysiology of anorexia in the cancer cachexia syndrome. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6(4):287–302. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu X, Burfeind KG, Michaelis KA, Braun TP, Olson B, Pelz KR, Morgan TK, Marks DL. MyD88 signalling is critical in the development of pancreatic cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(2):378–390. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kir S, White JP, Kleiner S, Kazak L, Cohen P, Baracos VE, Spiegelman BM. Tumour-derived PTH-related protein triggers adipose tissue browning and cancer cachexia. Nature. 2014;513(7516):100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature13528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calvani R, Marini F, Cesari M, Tosato M, Anker SD, von Haehling S, Miller RR, Bernabei R, Landi F, Marzetti E. Biomarkers for physical frailty and sarcopenia: state of the science and future developments. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6(4):278–286. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen JA, Splenser A, Guillory B, Luo J, Mendiratta M, Belinova B, Halder T, Zhang G, Li YP, Garcia JM. Ghrelin prevents tumour- and cisplatin-induced muscle wasting: characterization of multiple mechanisms involved. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6(2):132–143. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uzu M, Nonaka M, Miyano K, Sato H, Kurebayashi N, Yanagihara K, Sakurai T, Hisaka A, Uezono Y. A novel strategy for treatment of cancer cachexia targeting xanthine oxidase in the brain. J Pharmacol Sci. 2019;140(1):109–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2019.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Argiles JM, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Stemmler B, Busquets S. Therapeutic strategies against cancer cachexia. Eur J Transl Myol. 2019;29(1):7960. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2019.7960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kroenke CH, Prado CM, Meyerhardt JA, Weltzien EK, Xiao J, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Caan BJ. Muscle radiodensity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(14):3008–3015. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamilton G, Smith DL, Bydder M, Nayak KS, Hu HH. MR properties of brown and white adipose tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34(2):468–473. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prado CM, Birdsell LA, Baracos VE. The emerging role of computerized tomography in assessing cancer cachexia. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2009;3(4):269–275. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328331124a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Antoun S, Rossoni C, Lanoy E. What's next in using CT scans to better understand cachexia? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(4):427–433. doi: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brown JC, Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Weltzien E, Xiao J, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Kroenke CH, Castillo A, Kwan ML, Prado CM. The deterioration of muscle mass and radiodensity is prognostic of poor survival in stage I–III colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study (C-SCANS) J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9(4):664–672. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Caan BJ, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prado CM, Alexeeff S, Kroenke CH, Bradshaw P, Quesenberry CP, Weltzien EK, Castillo AL, Olobatuyi TA, Chen WY. Association of muscle and adiposity measured by computed tomography with survival in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(6):798–804. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bradshaw PT, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prado CM, Alexeeff S, Albers KB, Chen WY, Caan BJ. Adipose tissue distribution and survival among women with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) 2019;27(6):997–1004. doi: 10.1002/oby.22458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Konigorski S, Janke J, Drogan D, Bergmann MM, Hierholzer J, Kaaks R, Boeing H, Pischon T. Prediction of circulating adipokine levels based on body fat compartments and adipose tissue gene expression. Obes Facts. 2019;12(6):590–605. doi: 10.1159/000502117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maskarinec G, Ciba M, Ju D, Shepherd JA, Ernst T, Wu AH, Monroe KR, Lim U, Wilkens LR, Le Marchand L. Association of imaging-based body fat distribution and mammographic density in the multiethnic cohort adiposity phenotype study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(2):352–358. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rospleszcz S, Lorbeer R, Storz C, Schlett CL, Meisinger C, Thorand B, Rathmann W, Bamberg F, Lieb W, Peters A. Association of longitudinal risk profile trajectory clusters with adipose tissue depots measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53546-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adiseshaiah PP, Patel NL, Ileva LV, Kalen JD, Haines DC, McNeil SE. Longitudinal imaging of cancer cell metastases in two preclinical models: a correlation of noninvasive imaging to histopathology. Int J Mol Imaging. 2014;2014:102702. doi: 10.1155/2014/102702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bobek V, Kolostova K, Pinterova D, Kacprzak G, Adamiak J, Kolodziej J, Boubelik M, Kubecova M, Hoffman RM. A clinically relevant, syngeneic model of spontaneous, highly metastatic B16 mouse melanoma. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(12):4799–4803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schwenck J, Schorg B, Fiz F, Sonanini D, Forschner A, Eigentler T, Weide B, Martella M, Gonzalez-Menendez I, Campi C, Sambuceti G, Seith F, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Garbe C, Pfannenberg C, Rocken M, la Fougere C, Pichler BJ, Kneilling M. Cancer immunotherapy is accompanied by distinct metabolic patterns in primary and secondary lymphoid organs observed by non-invasive in vivo (18)F-FDG-PET. Theranostics. 2020;10(2):925–937. doi: 10.7150/thno.35989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Berglund J, Kullberg J. Three-dimensional water/fat separation and T2* estimation based on whole-image optimization–application in breathhold liver imaging at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(6):1684–1693. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wurslin C, Machann J, Rempp H, Claussen C, Yang B, Schick F. Topography mapping of whole body adipose tissue using a fully automated and standardized procedure. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2010;31(2):430–439. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang J, Li L, Lian J, Schauer S, Vesely PW, Kratky D, Hoefler G, Lehner R. Tumor-induced hyperlipidemia contributes to tumor growth. Cell Rep. 2016;15(2):336–348. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Donnelly LF, O'Brien KJ, Dardzinski BJ, Poe SA, Bean JA, Holland SK, Daniels SR. Using a phantom to compare MR techniques for determining the ratio of intraabdominal to subcutaneous adipose tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(4):993–998. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shen J, Baum T, Cordes C, Ott B, Skurk T, Kooijman H, Rummeny EJ, Hauner H, Menze BH, Karampinos DC. Automatic segmentation of abdominal organs and adipose tissue compartments in water-fat MRI: application to weight-loss in obesity. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(9):1613–1621. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kn BP, Gopalan V, Lee SS, Velan SS. Quantification of abdominal fat depots in rats and mice during obesity and weight loss interventions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e108979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kiefer LS, Fabian J, Lorbeer R, Machann J, Storz C, Kraus MS, Wintermeyer E, Schlett C, Roemer F, Nikolaou K, Peters A, Bamberg F. Inter- and intra-observer variability of an anatomical landmark-based, manual segmentation method by MRI for the assessment of skeletal muscle fat content and area in subjects from the general population. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1089):20180019. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ulbrich EJ, Nanz D, Leinhard OD, Marcon M, Fischer MA. Whole-body adipose tissue and lean muscle volumes and their distribution across gender and age: MR-derived normative values in a normal-weight Swiss population. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(1):449–458. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.West J, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Romu T, Collins R, Garratt S, Bell JD, Borga M, Thomas L. Feasibility of MR-based body composition analysis in large scale population studies. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0163332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berglund J, Johansson L, Ahlstrom H, Kullberg J. Three-point Dixon method enables whole-body water and fat imaging of obese subjects. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(6):1659–1668. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fallah F, Machann J, Martirosian P, Bamberg F, Schick F, Yang B. Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla. Magma (New York, NY) 2017;30(2):139–151. doi: 10.1007/s10334-016-0588-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2010;31(1):4–18. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grimm A, Meyer H, Nickel MD, Nittka M, Raithel E, Chaudry O, Friedberger A, Uder M, Kemmler W, Quick HH, Engelke K. Evaluation of 2-point, 3-point, and 6-point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging with flexible echo timing for muscle fat quantification. Eur J Radiol. 2018;103:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sadananthan SA, Prakash B, Leow MK, Khoo CM, Chou H, Venkataraman K, Khoo EY, Lee YS, Gluckman PD, Tai ES, Velan SS. Automated segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous (deep and superficial) adipose tissues in normal and overweight men. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2015;41(4):924–934. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Porcu M, Solinas C, Migali C, Battaglia A, Schena M, Mannelli L, Addeo A, Willard-Gallo K, Saba L. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury: imaging findings and literature review. Target Oncol. 2020;15(1):25–35. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00694-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Daoussis D, Kraniotis P, Filippopoulou A, Argiriadi R, Theodoraki S, Makatsoris T, Koutras A, Kehagias I, Papachristou DJ, Solomou A, Kalofonos H, Liossis SN. An MRI study of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal manifestations myofasciitis is the prominent imaging finding. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59(5):1041–1050. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iravani A, Osman MM, Weppler AM, Wallace R, Galligan A, Lasocki A, Hunter MO, Akhurst T, Hofman MS, Lau PKH, Kee D, Au-Yeung G, Sandhu S, Hicks RJ. FDG PET/CT for tumoral and systemic immune response monitoring of advanced melanoma during first-line combination ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04815-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Heinzerling L, Ott PA, Hodi FS, Husain AN, Tajmir-Riahi A, Tawbi H, Pauschinger M, Gajewski TF, Lipson EJ, Luke JJ. Cardiotoxicity associated with CTLA4 and PD1 blocking immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4:50. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0152-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]